Its not suprising for this move. I get PTN at work around once a month and there has been talk about Kodak completly dropping film in general.
Right now their goal is to promote digital film in a dry process enviorment.
Many PTN analysts think Kodak is rather jumping the gun.
Then again, at my store dont even have kodak cameras to sell. And we dont have their digitals and cant say we like them.
It would be interesting to see especialy since Kodak recently reorganized 70% of their company around in late Nov/Dec. (I am not sure, I dont have the article in front of me)
I have been rather a long time user of emusic.com and I havent used it recently since they changed it, I still liked their rather unlimited $10/month thing. Of course way back when, even emusic.com actualy charged the same.99/song (or exceptionaly long songs 1.29). The reason for this change is the merging of emusic.com with some parent company. I had recieved an annoucement in the mail and I already wooshed the email out into the abyss of doom. (As since this email was sent to me late summer time frame)
Hopefully the new company will realize emusics old scheme was a little more convient. But 40 songs is more than what i download in a month on emusic anyways. Maybe over time they will raise the ceiling a little.
Slashdot Mirror
Its not suprising for this move. I get PTN at work around once a month and there has been talk about Kodak completly dropping film in general. Right now their goal is to promote digital film in a dry process enviorment. Many PTN analysts think Kodak is rather jumping the gun. Then again, at my store dont even have kodak cameras to sell. And we dont have their digitals and cant say we like them. It would be interesting to see especialy since Kodak recently reorganized 70% of their company around in late Nov/Dec. (I am not sure, I dont have the article in front of me)
I have been rather a long time user of emusic.com and I havent used it recently since they changed it, I still liked their rather unlimited $10/month thing. Of course way back when, even emusic.com actualy charged the same .99/song (or exceptionaly long songs 1.29). The reason for this change is the merging of emusic.com with some parent company. I had recieved an annoucement in the mail and I already wooshed the email out into the abyss of doom. (As since this email was sent to me late summer time frame)
Hopefully the new company will realize emusics old scheme was a little more convient. But 40 songs is more than what i download in a month on emusic anyways. Maybe over time they will raise the ceiling a little.