Yeah, that is weird, I'd wonder if you're missing something stats-wise or if your site has some Safari issue you're not aware of? I work with a range of different sites, and I don't think I've seen Safari usage under five percent for any of them any time this year. FWIW, I haven't seen the giant drop the OP is referring to, just a continuation of the slow slide.
Re:Riding along with video card performance is sma
on
Lightroom Vs. Aperture
·
· Score: 1
Aperture's performance is fine for me, same hardware (MacBook Pro, 2.16 C2D, 2G RAM, 128MB graphics card). The (very individual) deciding factor for me was the interface- Aperture makes sense to me. Lightroom 's interface just isn't intuitive for my brain, I experimented with the beta versions as they came out and it was much more work to get it to Do What I Want.
I think so- I'm surprised there hasn't been more attention paid to that little mention in the first place. The dig at Google and the omission of other search engines having already caved (MSN likely one of them, being #3), combined with the article being on MSN, suggests bias to me.
Interestingly, the MSN article http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10925344/ mentions nothing about other search engines having handed over data, and also has an above-the-fold paragraph starting with "Privacy advocates have been increasingly scrutinizing Google's practices..."
yes please- I don't care so much about the live preview, but I'm really excited because I expect there's no mirror slap. I make porn, we shoot stills and video at the same time, and I would _love_ to have a decent camera that didn't leave us with a stream of 'k-klick, k-klicks' in our audio...
ads themselves.
We make porn. Sometimes we'll make something that we think is clever and entertaining freely available, e.g. a Pirate vs Ninja short we made for a local film festival. People get free stuff they like, we get exposure and hopefully customers, everybody wins.
We found a way to use RSS in porn, which I'm amazed noone else is doing yet. I run a BDSM porn site, we provide two RSS feeds for the weekly updates. One is for nonmembers, and links to a preview of each update, the other is for members, linking to the update itself. Since people still have to authenticate to get to the actual content, we don't have to worry about authenticating the members' feed.
This saves hassle for subscribers and browsers, since they don't have to keep checking back to see if we've updated, plus maybe saves a bit of bandwidth for us. Win for everybody.
>First, no, the exit polls do not suggest that. They perfectly mirror the results.
They do now. At 10:30 PST last night, CNN was showing exit polls for Ohio with Kerry in the lead 52% to 48%. As of about one o'clock, this had changed significicantly.
More specifically, they showed turnout late last night of 47% men and 53% women, with women voting Kerry 53%/47%, and men voting Kerry 51%/49%. They are now showing the same ratio of men and women, but women voting 50/50 and men voting 52%/47%.
They're not scaling back WinFS. There's no where in the article it even states this. All it says is that it will be available in beta form upon the client release.
From the article:
"The company is pushing some key improvements out of Longhorn, including the WinFS file system, for its release in 2006. The trade-offs are an effort to deliver other desired features on time. "
Yeah, that is weird, I'd wonder if you're missing something stats-wise or if your site has some Safari issue you're not aware of? I work with a range of different sites, and I don't think I've seen Safari usage under five percent for any of them any time this year. FWIW, I haven't seen the giant drop the OP is referring to, just a continuation of the slow slide.
Aperture's performance is fine for me, same hardware (MacBook Pro, 2.16 C2D, 2G RAM, 128MB graphics card). The (very individual) deciding factor for me was the interface- Aperture makes sense to me. Lightroom 's interface just isn't intuitive for my brain, I experimented with the beta versions as they came out and it was much more work to get it to Do What I Want.
step 1: google "os x text editor" step 2: there is no step 2
I think so- I'm surprised there hasn't been more attention paid to that little mention in the first place. The dig at Google and the omission of other search engines having already caved (MSN likely one of them, being #3), combined with the article being on MSN, suggests bias to me.
cute.
yes please- I don't care so much about the live preview, but I'm really excited because I expect there's no mirror slap. I make porn, we shoot stills and video at the same time, and I would _love_ to have a decent camera that didn't leave us with a stream of 'k-klick, k-klicks' in our audio...
ads themselves. We make porn. Sometimes we'll make something that we think is clever and entertaining freely available, e.g. a Pirate vs Ninja short we made for a local film festival. People get free stuff they like, we get exposure and hopefully customers, everybody wins.
I haven't seen it on any of the BDSM sites, which is all I really track... I dunno why, seems like a natural.
sorry, should have included that in the original
This saves hassle for subscribers and browsers, since they don't have to keep checking back to see if we've updated, plus maybe saves a bit of bandwidth for us. Win for everybody.
The site's Two Big Meanies, the nonmembers feed is at http://www.twobigmeanies.com/updates_rss.php if anyone's interested.
>First, no, the exit polls do not suggest that. They perfectly mirror the results. They do now. At 10:30 PST last night, CNN was showing exit polls for Ohio with Kerry in the lead 52% to 48%. As of about one o'clock, this had changed significicantly. More specifically, they showed turnout late last night of 47% men and 53% women, with women voting Kerry 53%/47%, and men voting Kerry 51%/49%. They are now showing the same ratio of men and women, but women voting 50/50 and men voting 52%/47%.