Yeah, I remember when diesel was much cheaper than gasoline, too. Until it got popular. Then it was more expensive for a time. Now they're about the same, I believe.
Re:Pop and junk food or ... human fat !
on
Driving on Starch
·
· Score: 1
How about pop and junk food? One Twinkie for me -- one for my horse...er my Honda.
The problem is that the car's brain box would suffer from diminished capacity
Oh hell, I don't know. Let's just build another set out there in the desert, fly some radio controlled planes into 'em, and see what happens. No other buildings had 250 tons fly into them either. Maybe somebody wanted to knock them down because they thought they were butt ugly. If you wanna see something really freaky, watch the Simpsons episode where they had 'N Sync on, and they shot a cruise missile at the Mad Magazine building. It fell exactly the same way. I can only draw my conclusions from the proven lies of the past, and note that nothing changed since then. Everybody managed to forget Watergate and Vietnam, and they put all the same old baldheads from that era right back into where they were before 1970. So, of course I'm going to expect the same thing from them. I honestly didn't expect them to blow the dust off of Operation Northwoods and actually pull it off. A little more discretion was in order, but then that word doesn't exist in the head of the drunken frat brat that was put in front of the camera.
Yeah, now that's the chickenshit I like to smell in the morning. The truth must smell just as bad to you, you freak! But I'll let ya do me...if you move how to move without boring me to death! You weirdo.
More! Dammit! I'm almost there! C'mon you wimp! What the hell's the matter witcha?! I don't feel a thing! I want my money back! Jeeze! Tom Foley's more exciting.
The Pentagon Papers and Iran-Contra never happened. Nope, not at all. Just a figment of my vivid imagination. Nor all of it before or since. The hostage deal is on paper. You can look it up yourself. I already saw it. I don't need to re-read it. Kinda funny how the same names pop up...since the 60s! Rumsfeld, Cheney. They were liars then too. But now they're all reformed an' stuff, huh? Yep, your government is nothing but little angels, wouldn't hurt a fly. A real stand up bunch you got. Except the democrats. They're teh evil(heh, actually they are, spineless SOBs, just like the republicans, BUT they all bring home the bacon) You're a good soldier, son. Keep the faith. They're countin' on ya there. That's all they got, and apparently you're more than willing. And it'll keep you off the no fly list. Don't be surprised when they shake down your kids though. They're the real terrorists. Even got a few of them of the list. With all the racket they make, and kicking the seats in front, they probably should be.
If you find some good weed, hook me up, would ya? It's been a bit dry here lately. THX
They're gonna outlaw real charcoal and lighter fluid. Into the trash heap with those incandescent light bulbs they go. No more nuclear holocaust in the backyard anymore. If congress tries this, let's all mail them a briquet.
Yeah? and who's Osama been working for for the last 25 years? And probably STILL is? Nothin' but a middleman he is. The general contractor responsible for gathering up the crew. Needed someone that speaks the language..and not gay (Heh, so they think). And Who was Saddam working for over roughly the exact same period? All the way up until the end? Witness protection is gonna work good for this guy. Nope, playing it smart this time Not going leave no tapes lying around like 72. These "Pentagon Papers" are being shredded AND burned, and the ashes buried at sea. Camper's Creed, Leave no trace. They got caught once. Not this time.
WooHoo! The neo-con weekend warriors strike back! Oooo yeah That's the way, uh huh, uh huh, I like it. Yeah, gettin' that rhythm back, yeah...smooth baby. C'mon! Do a little dance, Make a little love, Get down tonight...C'mon! Hit me! YYYES! Make that noose tighter! And do it like you never have! OH! YEAH! Ooo LORDY! Put on that raincoat! There's gonna be showers tonight! Let's get this party started, started...We're goin' NUCLEAR!
I've seen enough lies come from the government to consider them every bit as credible as the your conspiracy theorists. I don't believe the buildings were demolished, but there is no reason to believe the government's position either. With all the dirty dealing going on, there's every reason to believe that this was at least allowed to happen. None of you can prove that these guys weren't hired. And you certainly don't know by whom. You like to think all these suicide bombing are random. Well they're not. Every one of these guys have a mark, or specific target. Their methods are as crude as the Russian mob's. But like everything else you have to go with what works when your budget is limited. Tell you what. Let's sell them all our super accurate weapons so we can reduce the collateral damage. Would that make you feel better? Cause they sure aren't gonna stop fighting. May as well make a little more money, since it turns out the states is usually playing both sides a la Iran-Contra. Maybe you should check another under reported story about how the government gave back a bunch of laundered counterfeit money to the North Koreans in what ended up being a false hope that they would stop their nuclear work. What in the world is with you that you would think the Americans are any less crooked than any other tin pot dictator that they prop up? Good job on choosing the spoon fed Newscorp Way! Your attempts at distraction are boundless and unmatched by anybody on the planet. And lucky for all of you, they still work as well as they ever have. Because of that, you have two front runners that are worse than Bush. You're doing such a great job of making the world so safe for any American that dares step outside the border. You're all heart!
...because it takes the eyes of the undisputed fact...
And who is exactly is the source of these "facts"? "If the glove don't fit"...But you just knew he's guilty, right? Did you ever suspect that Ollie North was/is a criminal before the Iran-Contra hearings? "I was under medication when I made the decision not to burn the tapes." --Richard Nixon Mmmm, Kool-Aid good, huh?
Got it, thanks:-) Sorry 'bout that. This whole thing about who can use and distribute has gotten out of control, and I find it just a bit prickly when I even think that someone believes these restrictions are okay. I'm as extremely anti-plagiarism as I am anti-copyright/patent. However, even that must accommodate the fact that, more often than not, more than one person will have the same idea in the same or similar environment. So, for me to claim true enlightenment, I would have to give up the idea of attribution to any particular person, exclusive of the rest, also. We are all simply too connected with each other to be able to claim true originality, and the whole thing has become nothing but a race. We live in a world run by financiers and merchants, and plagiarism is a fairly clear cut issue, far more so than the runaway IP gravy train, so I'll work with that...for now.
...I am saying that it is a huge cost that must be taken into account.
The benefits far outweigh the costs, but not to the snake oil salesmen running the planet. They depend on ignorance to keep the worker bees from flying the coup. That's the only reason to deny an education.
And please stop playing the race/bigotry card.
Why? Besides the money angle, which is the REAL reason that they exist, that's all that's left. It is just as bigoted to exclude someone due place of birth as anything else. And, as you say, "The country of origin has nothing to do with it.". That's exactly what I'm saying. You never heard me say different. You want to restrict access due to "country" of origin. Precisely the same thing as doing so because of one's skin color. The analogy holds up very well. So well, in fact, you will do what you can to get people to ignore it through the distractions I've mentioned. The analogy is so accurate that it could get people to actually take action. This goes to the very core, and those in the "import/export" business have the most to lose, and will crank up the propaganda machinery full throttle to keep people in the dark. Well, I will do what it takes to keep people focused on the real nature of the issue, and I just may get results. It's worth every effort to do what can be done to set people free. This is a global issue, not just American.
...point it at people on your side who keep bringing up the extremely classist "jobs no one wants" argument.
You never once heard me use that (yet another) Newscorp distraction. That seems to be a very common tactic with the people on YOUR side, not mine. I'm talking about being a human being and treating others likewise, instead of keeping them caged like animals. I'm telling you that borders are imprisonment and slavery, and all of you keep trying to divert attention away from that. You believe the lie put forth by vested interests that the border is for your protection when nothing could be further from the truth. You've been hoodwinked, and you keep disparaging those who are telling you so, instead of attacking the "hoodwinkers"(hoodwankers). Well, that just sounds like a symptom of the Stockholm Syndrome where the victim defends their kidnapper. You are doing exactly that. You have formed a natural bond. You defend the thief, for fear of looking like a fool by admitting you've been robbed. It has also become a matter of saving face. The Americans stayed in Vietnam for that exact same reason, and is doing the same in Iraq. It is foolish pride, and people are dying for it. It's a very common defense mechanism. But you still fail to explain logically why international borders are needed without using the propagandist's arguments. While I can clearly show that you merely want to corral people like cattle, for maximum "efficiency", and profit.
Government enforced rent-seeking is more profitable than prostitution...
I wouldn't know the difference...
...it's ok both for migration to be completely unrestricted yet for the corresponding flow of goods not to be.
Don't know how you deduced that, but mind reading is not a big thing of mine. In fact, I'm drunk as a motherf'er right now, and will only respond in the journal for now because I no longer wish to pollute this article. *hicccc* thankyouverrrymuch...
:-) It's all good. whatever makes you feel right. Someday you will see that delusion is reality. I'm as happy as can be... So, anytime you wish to carry on, I'll always be here. Got a wide open journal. For now "...you go your way, I'll go mine..." Peace, my friend.
Yes...well...feel free to take that up where it would be a tiny bit more on topic. I didn't bring that up here. Here, I shall be more than happy to carry on with the subject that I brought up. That would be *Where are you more secure? In the city? Or in the countryside?*. Deal? Cool...I'm with ya all the way, babe.
From a completely economic standpoint you would be correct, and I understand completely. And as an "import/export"(pirate) merchant, I would fight to the death to keep those barriers up to protect my profits. Make then as strong as possible. That is why they exist to begin with. The differential is what creates the flow of money through enforced poverty, etc. They don't exist to protect you, your property, or your life. They exist for the sole benefit of commercial interests. And here we are...in perpetual war...which as it turns out, is damn good business by itself. No problem as long as you can keep it off shore. I should have gotten into the arms trade. It's probably the only industry that's more profitable than prostitution.
Slashdot Mirror
Beer is still safe.
Yeah, I remember when diesel was much cheaper than gasoline, too. Until it got popular. Then it was more expensive for a time. Now they're about the same, I believe.
How about pop and junk food? One Twinkie for me -- one for my horse...er my Honda.
The problem is that the car's brain box would suffer from diminished capacity
Oh hell, I don't know. Let's just build another set out there in the desert, fly some radio controlled planes into 'em, and see what happens. No other buildings had 250 tons fly into them either. Maybe somebody wanted to knock them down because they thought they were butt ugly. If you wanna see something really freaky, watch the Simpsons episode where they had 'N Sync on, and they shot a cruise missile at the Mad Magazine building. It fell exactly the same way. I can only draw my conclusions from the proven lies of the past, and note that nothing changed since then. Everybody managed to forget Watergate and Vietnam, and they put all the same old baldheads from that era right back into where they were before 1970. So, of course I'm going to expect the same thing from them. I honestly didn't expect them to blow the dust off of Operation Northwoods and actually pull it off. A little more discretion was in order, but then that word doesn't exist in the head of the drunken frat brat that was put in front of the camera.
100% Overrated
Yeah, now that's the chickenshit I like to smell in the morning. The truth must smell just as bad to you, you freak! But I'll let ya do me...if you move how to move without boring me to death! You weirdo.
(Score:0, Offtopic)
More! Dammit! I'm almost there! C'mon you wimp! What the hell's the matter witcha?! I don't feel a thing! I want my money back! Jeeze! Tom Foley's more exciting.
The Pentagon Papers and Iran-Contra never happened. Nope, not at all. Just a figment of my vivid imagination. Nor all of it before or since. The hostage deal is on paper. You can look it up yourself. I already saw it. I don't need to re-read it. Kinda funny how the same names pop up...since the 60s! Rumsfeld, Cheney. They were liars then too. But now they're all reformed an' stuff, huh? Yep, your government is nothing but little angels, wouldn't hurt a fly. A real stand up bunch you got. Except the democrats. They're teh evil(heh, actually they are, spineless SOBs, just like the republicans, BUT they all bring home the bacon) You're a good soldier, son. Keep the faith. They're countin' on ya there. That's all they got, and apparently you're more than willing. And it'll keep you off the no fly list. Don't be surprised when they shake down your kids though. They're the real terrorists. Even got a few of them of the list. With all the racket they make, and kicking the seats in front, they probably should be.
If you find some good weed, hook me up, would ya? It's been a bit dry here lately. THX
They're gonna outlaw real charcoal and lighter fluid. Into the trash heap with those incandescent light bulbs they go. No more nuclear holocaust in the backyard anymore. If congress tries this, let's all mail them a briquet.
Nope. The Earth sucks!
...but this is for the whole family.
So's the bourbon. What's the age there? Two?
Yeah? and who's Osama been working for for the last 25 years? And probably STILL is? Nothin' but a middleman he is. The general contractor responsible for gathering up the crew. Needed someone that speaks the language..and not gay (Heh, so they think). And Who was Saddam working for over roughly the exact same period? All the way up until the end? Witness protection is gonna work good for this guy. Nope, playing it smart this time Not going leave no tapes lying around like 72. These "Pentagon Papers" are being shredded AND burned, and the ashes buried at sea. Camper's Creed, Leave no trace. They got caught once. Not this time.
(Score:0, Troll)
WooHoo! The neo-con weekend warriors strike back! Oooo yeah That's the way, uh huh, uh huh, I like it. Yeah, gettin' that rhythm back, yeah...smooth baby. C'mon! Do a little dance, Make a little love, Get down tonight...C'mon! Hit me! YYYES! Make that noose tighter! And do it like you never have! OH! YEAH! Ooo LORDY! Put on that raincoat! There's gonna be showers tonight! Let's get this party started, started...We're goin' NUCLEAR!
I've seen enough lies come from the government to consider them every bit as credible as the your conspiracy theorists. I don't believe the buildings were demolished, but there is no reason to believe the government's position either. With all the dirty dealing going on, there's every reason to believe that this was at least allowed to happen. None of you can prove that these guys weren't hired. And you certainly don't know by whom. You like to think all these suicide bombing are random. Well they're not. Every one of these guys have a mark, or specific target. Their methods are as crude as the Russian mob's. But like everything else you have to go with what works when your budget is limited. Tell you what. Let's sell them all our super accurate weapons so we can reduce the collateral damage. Would that make you feel better? Cause they sure aren't gonna stop fighting. May as well make a little more money, since it turns out the states is usually playing both sides a la Iran-Contra. Maybe you should check another under reported story about how the government gave back a bunch of laundered counterfeit money to the North Koreans in what ended up being a false hope that they would stop their nuclear work. What in the world is with you that you would think the Americans are any less crooked than any other tin pot dictator that they prop up? Good job on choosing the spoon fed Newscorp Way! Your attempts at distraction are boundless and unmatched by anybody on the planet. And lucky for all of you, they still work as well as they ever have. Because of that, you have two front runners that are worse than Bush. You're doing such a great job of making the world so safe for any American that dares step outside the border. You're all heart!
We're too focused on the arrival of January, 2009. The steady decline is a sure thing at least till then. And the smart money is on more of the same.
...because it takes the eyes of the undisputed fact...
And who is exactly is the source of these "facts"?
"If the glove don't fit"...But you just knew he's guilty, right?
Did you ever suspect that Ollie North was/is a criminal before the Iran-Contra hearings?
"I was under medication when I made the decision not to burn the tapes." --Richard Nixon
Mmmm, Kool-Aid good, huh?
...because its based on pseudo-science...
Yeah, like evolution..But creationism is real science and should be taught as such in school.
Got it, thanks :-) Sorry 'bout that. This whole thing about who can use and distribute has gotten out of control, and I find it just a bit prickly when I even think that someone believes these restrictions are okay. I'm as extremely anti-plagiarism as I am anti-copyright/patent. However, even that must accommodate the fact that, more often than not, more than one person will have the same idea in the same or similar environment. So, for me to claim true enlightenment, I would have to give up the idea of attribution to any particular person, exclusive of the rest, also. We are all simply too connected with each other to be able to claim true originality, and the whole thing has become nothing but a race. We live in a world run by financiers and merchants, and plagiarism is a fairly clear cut issue, far more so than the runaway IP gravy train, so I'll work with that...for now.
...I am saying that it is a huge cost that must be taken into account.
...point it at people on your side who keep bringing up the extremely classist "jobs no one wants" argument.
The benefits far outweigh the costs, but not to the snake oil salesmen running the planet. They depend on ignorance to keep the worker bees from flying the coup. That's the only reason to deny an education.
And please stop playing the race/bigotry card.
Why? Besides the money angle, which is the REAL reason that they exist, that's all that's left. It is just as bigoted to exclude someone due place of birth as anything else. And, as you say, "The country of origin has nothing to do with it.". That's exactly what I'm saying. You never heard me say different. You want to restrict access due to "country" of origin. Precisely the same thing as doing so because of one's skin color. The analogy holds up very well. So well, in fact, you will do what you can to get people to ignore it through the distractions I've mentioned. The analogy is so accurate that it could get people to actually take action. This goes to the very core, and those in the "import/export" business have the most to lose, and will crank up the propaganda machinery full throttle to keep people in the dark. Well, I will do what it takes to keep people focused on the real nature of the issue, and I just may get results. It's worth every effort to do what can be done to set people free. This is a global issue, not just American.
You never once heard me use that (yet another) Newscorp distraction. That seems to be a very common tactic with the people on YOUR side, not mine. I'm talking about being a human being and treating others likewise, instead of keeping them caged like animals. I'm telling you that borders are imprisonment and slavery, and all of you keep trying to divert attention away from that. You believe the lie put forth by vested interests that the border is for your protection when nothing could be further from the truth. You've been hoodwinked, and you keep disparaging those who are telling you so, instead of attacking the "hoodwinkers"(hoodwankers). Well, that just sounds like a symptom of the Stockholm Syndrome where the victim defends their kidnapper. You are doing exactly that. You have formed a natural bond. You defend the thief, for fear of looking like a fool by admitting you've been robbed. It has also become a matter of saving face. The Americans stayed in Vietnam for that exact same reason, and is doing the same in Iraq. It is foolish pride, and people are dying for it. It's a very common defense mechanism. But you still fail to explain logically why international borders are needed without using the propagandist's arguments. While I can clearly show that you merely want to corral people like cattle, for maximum "efficiency", and profit.
Where were you people when they took The Dating Game off the air?
Wyhhtg...Why me...whoooe..who elssseee?? *brraaaaappp* oops..sosorry..didIgetanyonya?
Government enforced rent-seeking is more profitable than prostitution...
...it's ok both for migration to be completely unrestricted yet for the corresponding flow of goods not to be.
I wouldn't know the difference...
Don't know how you deduced that, but mind reading is not a big thing of mine. In fact, I'm drunk as a motherf'er right now, and will only respond in the journal for now because I no longer wish to pollute this article. *hicccc* thankyouverrrymuch...
:-) It's all good. whatever makes you feel right. Someday you will see that delusion is reality. I'm as happy as can be... So, anytime you wish to carry on, I'll always be here. Got a wide open journal. For now "...you go your way, I'll go mine..." Peace, my friend.
Yes...well...feel free to take that up where it would be a tiny bit more on topic. I didn't bring that up here. Here, I shall be more than happy to carry on with the subject that I brought up. That would be *Where are you more secure? In the city? Or in the countryside?*. Deal? Cool...I'm with ya all the way, babe.
From a completely economic standpoint you would be correct, and I understand completely. And as an "import/export"(pirate) merchant, I would fight to the death to keep those barriers up to protect my profits. Make then as strong as possible. That is why they exist to begin with. The differential is what creates the flow of money through enforced poverty, etc. They don't exist to protect you, your property, or your life. They exist for the sole benefit of commercial interests. And here we are...in perpetual war...which as it turns out, is damn good business by itself. No problem as long as you can keep it off shore. I should have gotten into the arms trade. It's probably the only industry that's more profitable than prostitution.
I'm still waiting for your address...
Not today..."but surely to-morrow"...