Slashdot Mirror


"Jericho" Fans Send Over Nine Tons of Nuts to CBS

nuts-to-CBS writes "After presenting 'Jericho' fans with a cliffhanging season finale, CBS promptly cancelled the program. The shocked fans quickly banded together, many using CBS' own public "Jericho" discussion forum, and began brainstorming on ways to convince the network to bring back the show for a second season. A plot point in the final episode of "Jericho" involving the expletive "Nuts!" (in reference to an historic conversation between generals) was turned into a campaign to send large quantities of nuts to CBS' NY, LA, and affiliate offices. Fans have sent a total of $26,000 for a pooled campaign hosted at Nuts Online to ship over 19,000 pounds of peanuts to CBS. Other efforts acquired over $9,000 to publish full page advertisements in Variety (National Edition) and The Hollywood Reporter for Tuesday, May 29th. This is expected to become the largest ever fan campaign to bring a television show back from cancellation." There's more about the massive fan rollout below. CBS created rich, interactive content online to accompany their show "Jericho," in order to extend its fan base to the Internet-savvy, TiVo-owning generations. Despite suffering through the all-too-familiar mid-season hiatus employed by many shows, the "Jericho" fan base remained strong throughout the break, partially due to the episodes being posted both for free on the CBS site as well as for purchase on iTunes. "Jericho" returned from the hiatus in the same timeslot occupied by "American Idol." CBS — which apparently still determines programming primarily on Nielsen ratings — decided to drop the show, regardless of the ever-growing and loyal fan base. Nuts Online includes live blogging from Jeffrey Braverman, the company's 26-year old CEO. Jeffrey's company has been shipping up to 5,000 pounds of peanuts a day to the CBS New York headquarters, and has been using their site to describe his experience along the way. Three other fan sites are documenting the progress: CBS Jericho Message Board, Jericho Lives, and Jericho Rally Point. Fans of Roswell were successful in bringing back their favorite program by sending mass quantities of tiny bottles of Tabasco sauce."

408 comments

  1. Jericho *was* Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First off, I'm sure that the people at CBS are enjoying the free lifetime supply of tasty peanuts. Hopefully they'll send back a thank-you card. Maybe one of those new Star Wars Hallmark cards. (After all, it's the least they can do.)

    That being said, Jericho went off the air because the show took a wrong turn at Albuquerque. When it first started, the premise was intriguing. A post-holocaust world from the perspective of those who have no idea what could possibly be going on. It makes for a great setup. The first few episodes were even fairly good, with the early problems from the detonation wreaking all kinds of havoc. After that? Things went downhill.

    Pretty soon the show was focusing more on love triangles than it was on the fact that everyone was just trying to survive. Emergencies were regularly forced into the story rather than the characters having to deal with realistic difficulties. There was so much that they could be exploring, yet the show was being "the O.C. after the bomb". (Or whatever the latest "pop" show is for stupid teenagers. Anyone remember that scene from Stargate-SG1 "200"? Yeah, that.)

    As interesting as it had been, I just lost interest in the show. Checking my iTunes library, it looks like I stopped at "The Day Before". 13 episodes watched, and I just couldn't stand it anymore. So is it really any surprise that Jericho got cancelled?

    I realize that many fans are begging for a conclusion to the cliffhanger, but that will pass with time. Remember the show Sliders? Remember how it died in the 5th season with both the main characters wiped out, Wade killed off in a twisted experiment, the reason for sliding gone, and a hokey story about a mad scientist stuck its the place? The show lost its purpose, yet the producers ended the season with a massive cliffhanger in hopes that fan outcry would bring the show back. And after watching the final episode, you do get a feeling of, "You can't leave it there!"

    But in hindsight, it's best that it stayed off the air. There was about a zero point zero zero chance that the O'Connell brothers were going to return to the show, and the writing had been of poor quality anyway. If the show had returned, we would have gotten another season of the show's slow and agonizing death. Why? It was best that it was put out of its misery.

    (Of course, the show "jumped the shark" in the third season with the loss of John Rhys-Davies, but at least the "finding Earth" and "looking for Ma and Pa" subplot was interesting.)

    So I'm sorry to say this, but let it die. It was a nice try, but hopefully a better show will take its place.

    1. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by NMerriam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree -- it was an intruiging premise that kept me watching for about 9 episodes, when it became clear they were basically a LOST-style show that was never going to bother answeing anything and just keep adding more and more complicated conspiracies and romances and subplots rather than focus on the thing that actually, you know, INTRUIGED us about the story in the first place.

      I did watch the finale just to see what if anything had been resolved, and have to admit I was somewhat interested in what would happen, since it was actually about the freaking story the whole show was supposed to be about. But no, they decided to leave viewers with a completely unsatisfying show by wasting episode after episode on farmer love triangles while civil war, military coups, and nuclear terrorism in the continental United States were apparently too boring to be dealt with until well after many people had given up on the issues ever being talked about again.

      You know the old joke about IBM marketing would sell sushi by calling it "cold, raw dead fish". CBS apparently hired IBM marketing to write this show because they started with an inherently story-filled premise and managed to fill hour after hour with dull flashbacks on generic midwestern family crap that could have been lifted from episodes of Seventh Heaven.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    2. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by NMerriam · · Score: 3, Funny

      Aargh, the more I sit and think the more annoyed I get all over again.

      I just can't imagine sitting around a table in the writer's room and listening to somebody say "Okay, we've blown up all the major cities in the USA, the country is in Civil War, looting and riots are rampant, normal citizens are totally isolated, thrown back into the 19th century ways of living overnight -- but what people want to know is, will Jake hook up with the blonde or the brunette? And what impact would post-apocalyptic panic have on rural thanksgiving celebrations?"

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    3. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Green+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      yet the show was being "the O.C. after the bomb".

      Don't call it that.

      --

      Green Monkey

    4. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Octopus · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but it was actually "The Day Before" (which I believe was the episode right after the hiatus) that opened the series up for me. I liked the first few episodes, and yeah I got tired of the love triangles (although that kind of shit happens in a small town, so it can't be avoided) - but that episode, to me, is when the series took off.

      The recent lead up to war with the neighboring town was really well done, and I'm really disappointed they decided to throw it all in the garbage. Very glad there's such a big fan base.

      Besides, Skeet Ulrich really really needs a career. I think.

    5. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by yoasif · · Score: 1

      Sounds just like I thought it would be. I've never seen it, but it got a lot of positive hype (kinda like Lost's hype), and I figured that something that universally hyped (I didn't even feel like people really liked it so much as it was something "new" to watch that wasn't as bad as everything else) couldn't be that great.

      Still, I wish someone would step up and do another Mr. Show like show.

    6. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh. Sorry.

      How about, "90210 meets Little Boy and the Fat Man"?

    7. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      You stopped watching at "The Day Before", meaning you skipped the entire second half of the season, which was 10 times better than the first half.

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    8. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only I had a nickel for everytime someone told me that and it turned out to be untrue...

    9. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      (I accidentally hit Submit before I finished)
      The second half of the season didn't deal much with love triangles, rather it focused on the Hawkins character, who was much more interesting than the Jake character.

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    10. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by loganrapp · · Score: 1

      Black Jauer is not pleased with his cancellation.

    11. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      I was going to reply to the story with a comment much like yours, but you've captured it so very nicely that I'll only add that I agree.

      My wife and I have watched every episode, but every episode we say "this is going to be the last one". And then they pull just enough out to keep us mildly interested for just one more show. There wasn't anything else on on Wednesdays, anyways. We were actually both relieved by the cancelation.

      This is a really really bad show, with an interesting premise that the writers, almost, but not quite entirely, ignored.

      What's more interesting to us is that we thought we were alone in thinking it, but some other friends confirmed the same sentiment--really really bad but they still find themselves watching it.

      I can tell you I won't be sending nuts to anyone. God I hope this stunt fails.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    12. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Car54 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have followed many TV shows over the years....some of the Sci-Fi shows I participated somewhat in their coming back....but without a doubt my fervor and dedication to this show is beyond anything I consider rational. I have sent 3 sets of nuts to CBS. I have called at least 20 times, written 6 letters and postcards, joined about 6 forums, blogs, news sites specifically to stand up for this show returning. Those such as the Anonymous Coward who posted this comment is not a dedicated fan, and that's fine....but despite his feeble attempt to rain on our parade, notice the groundswell of support for bring back Jericho continues to grow....not wane. Any of us could write a plausible ending for the season finale....but that is not what we are fighting for. In part this bad move by CBS taps into all the TV media companies that have crapped on many fans over the years. I have no doubt that the fans will keep growing, and becomine ever more forceful in taking actions to get this great show back.

    13. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by NMerriam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The second half of the season didn't deal much with love triangles, rather it focused on the Hawkins character, who was much more interesting than the Jake character.


      See, I had the exact opposite reaction -- I thought the Hawkins character really made the show so silly and artificial that it distracted the writers from the core concept. It's like they had the show ready to go and then they said "But we need a mysterious cryptic character like Locke from LOST!"

      Hawkins seemed to function as a Deus Ex Machina whenever the writers couldn't solve a problem or wanted to throw in a curve ball. Nuclear bombs destroying the country and the survivors having to figure out what to do is really plenty interesting as a premise -- we don't need some guy with super-duper hacking powers, a nuclear bomb and ninja skills (who speaks Chinese and works for the Trilateral Commission) to move into town the day before it all happens.

      And his whole ex-wife and kids drama was just as dull and uninteresting to me as Jake's girl troubles. Adding a ninja ex-girlfriend back from the dead who may be trying to double-cross him while working for the Man in Black is not interesting, it's unnecessary.

      If the writers from Jericho had been in charge of Heroes, they would have spent 7 episodes dealing with Claire and an ex-boyfriend, a pregnancy scare, her mom having an affair, etc. Hiro discovers he can stop time but instead of trying to save the world he spends the first 22 episodes going back to his childhood and crying while watching his father learn to ride a bicycle and wondering why his Mom didn't breast feed him. Syler would have shown up in the last half of the last episode of the season, and the writers would wonder why the show was being canceled.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    14. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by freakybob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh come on, SOMEONE has to mod that one funny. Topical, too - reference to another cancelled show with a loyal fanbase.

    15. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What scene from "200"? The one with all the kids replacing the regulars? Or the one where Jack and Sam get married?

      I'd agree with you in theory, but decent shows are just so rare these days. I'd rather a good show which had jumped the shark than any number of crappy lowest common denominator reality v2.0 shows.
    16. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      Still, I wish someone would step up and do another Mr. Show like show.

      I loved that show. My favorite was this one from 2 minutes to 7 minutes ("Change for a dollar")..

      Try Whitest Kids U Know. Some of my favorite sketches:

      Leg peeing
      Cubicle boss
      Slow jerk
      Abe Lincoln - the true story

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    17. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Nossie · · Score: 1


      "Pretty soon the show was focusing more on love triangles than it was on the fact that everyone was just trying to survive. Emergencies were regularly forced into the story rather than the characters having to deal with realistic difficulties."

      BAH! reminds me too much of Enterprise. Die jerico die !! and I never even saw the damn show :P

    18. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by macshome · · Score: 1

      Oh if ONLY I had points to mod you funny!

    19. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by gizelda196 · · Score: 1

      Jericho is an awesome show! We wont stop until we get season 2 jericholives.com

    20. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by JpMaxMan · · Score: 1

      Ummmm - did you even watch the show? It sounds like you watched the first 3 to 4 episodes and left it at that. The show was ALL about survival. Yes, there were interpersonal relationships mixed up in that fight, but the entire reason the town was being invaded by the neighboring town at the end was for FOOD and resources. Every man for himself, and defending your home turf - the essence of survival. All civilized behavior was practically out the window and the needs of the characters went back to the most basic human ones. Look at the characters that rose from near obscurity before the bombs, after the bombs they had the personality types that is more conducive to a crisis mode than a society.

    21. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by sherylb33 · · Score: 0

      I am guessing that you are not a writer for TV. If you were you would understand that it is their responsibility to appeal to as many viewers as possible. Actually, I think that the writers did a fantastic job leading the characters through their experiences. In difficult times, such as those portrayed in Jericho, it is our relationships with others that become the most important aspect of our lives. Their very survival depends on working together. This show is about a rural community joining together. They are basically cut off from the rest of the country, and they are curious about what's happening elsewhere, but they have to deal with their own struggles and not what's happening four states over. For the writers to have discounted the past, current and future relationships of the characters lives would have been a geat disservice to the story line of Jericho. Each viewer decides for themselves which part of the story they chose connect with. Whether it is the love triangles, the strong ties of the Green family, the basic struggle for survival or the "Hawking" good or bad guy question. The fact is that my family...all seven of us (parents...early 40's and five kids ranging in age from 10 to 17) found Jericho was the ONLY program worth watching on TV. It reinforced for my children the lessons that we try to instill in them. Things like the importance good character and humanity even when faced with the most difficult of times. It is a shame that CBS decided to take a entertaining story and replace it with more reality TV crap...Just what the kids of today need! (being sarcastic!)

    22. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      That's the problem with a lot of recent TV.

      They don't bother to keep us interested with things that really ARE interesting, but with mildly interesting cliffhanger here, cliffhanger there, to get us watch the thing next week.

      I'm fed up with it to the point that I don't even bother watching shows on the first run anymore. Invasion, Jericho, etc.... string people along with cliffhanger after cliffhanger until the entire series stops one day with a cliffhanger that is never resolved.

      Of course when the whole think reaches syndication one day nobody bothers to watch it, since they know there is no real ending anyway. The shows with in themselves conclusive episodes might not be such a quick starter than the cliffhanger ones, but I think I will think in 10 years or* so "Oh, there is Firefly again. Might as well catch a few Episodes, they were good"

      *If there still is such thing as broadcast TV then.

    23. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      And what impact would post-apocalyptic panic have on rural thanksgiving celebrations?

      Actually, that doesn't sound too bad, but the "Blown-the-hell-up-90210" part sounds painful.

      When I saw the stories about this show before it came out, I had no doubt that network television would make a hash of it. I've developed a new procedure for any network-or-cable television shows:

      I don't watch them. THEN, if I start hearing buzz about them being amazing, I'll go back and download the first few episodes via Bittorrent. If they knock me out, I'll download the rest. Usually, by this time, the show is getting ready to go off the air (ala "Deadwood", "The Wire", etc.). Eventually, I catch up until I get to the point, like now, when I download the latest episode of The Sopranos on Monday morning from my trusty BT client.

      It really saves on the cable bill - I don't get one because I don't have cable. Believe me, the worthwhile stuff filters through the great sieve of BitTorrent and I don't find myself on a Saturday afternoon watching some shite made-for-TV nonsense on the Sci-Fi Channel.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    24. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It really saves on the cable bill

      I do similar things: If I want to eat out - I just skip out on the bill. I routinely shoplift - that saves a LOT of money.

    25. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by thc69 · · Score: 1

      Enterprise? How about DS9? That turned into a full-on soap opera, merely in a setting similar to a Star Trek show...that was awful. One day I realized that I couldn't understand why I still watched.

      I've always like post-holocaust books ("The Andromeda Strain" and "The Stand" being popular examples) and figured I ought to like Jericho but never got around to watching it. Oh well.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    26. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by timmyandrosi · · Score: 1

      folks... its not about whether you like the show. What if the powers that be decided to take down slashdot because they could not make the amount of money they think they could. The internet generation is not be counted properly. WE are measured by ad impressions and click thrus and 30 minute spots. We are NOT measured as people or contributors. Jericho was cancelled because CBS could not count the new generation. US.!!! An they wanted to reach us. so they did but it could not be measuered. The uprising is about using the community created and striking back so quickly we caught CBS completely off guard. It took them days to sort out how to stop 10 of thousands of emails, thousands of phone calls and tons of nuts. Its all happened in one week!! The internet generation needs to speak out with one voice. We are real, we count but maybe we dont look like those older generations.! Save Jericho, Save the world

    27. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by HeshWasHere · · Score: 1

      That's where they failed, "appeal to as many viewers as possible." This show appealed to the geriatric crowd and the women who love Skeet Ulrich. A 2.2 rating for the finale in the key demo? They couldn't cancel this show fast enough. Talk about a great premise that was completely ruined. Maybe getting this show off the air will inspire someone to create a new one about would it REALLY would be like in a post-apocoliptic America.

    28. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by dwcarless · · Score: 1

      CBS was nuts to cancel Jericho.

      1) With 9.5 million viewers it ranked 48 out of 142 of all programs. This includes stints against American Idol and Dancing with the Stars. Also this does NOT include web-based viewership, which is an integral part of this show. Total number of actual eyes most likely puts it in the top 25. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_displa y/television/features/e3ifbfdd1bcb53266ad8d9a71cad 261604f

      2) Two major case studies are showing that this is not "just about Jericho". http://copywriteink.blogspot.com/search/label/jeri cho and http://find-the-boots.blogspot.com/ What we are seeing is a paradigm shift between Old Media and New Media. The core essence of which is that modern technology is rendering Nielsen rating obsolete, and that successful shows like Jericho are tapping into additional resources that change it from a 42 minute a week stint on the couch into a week long web-based multi-media interactive experience with the creators and peer to peer.

      3) There is a lot of resistance by non-fans to other "save my show" movements because of the sheer number of cancellations. Most people have had favorite show cancelled, and most people have been impotent to do anything about it. And for a majority of those people, they will resent the empowerment that a successful movement has.

      4) The bottom line is that CBS has a crisis on it's hands. Right now it is faced off a virtual organization with: about 50,000 volunteer employees, some business sponsorship, a current operating budget of about $120,000 per month, and the potential for membership growth well into the millions (people and dollars). As a practical matter they have to deal with a swamped email voicemail issue, 10 tons of peanuts, two full page ads on Tuesday, and the inability to get any traction with their new fall lineup.

      If CBS considers this a win -- canceling a solidly ranked show, teeing off millions of fans, and doing battle against an organized viral campaign -- then something is broken at CBS. And for those people that don't have a vested interest in this movement (non-CBS execs and non-fans) but who are trolling with negative comments, basically you are irrelevant. Not in a derogatory way, but in an analytical way. It is not a value-added asset that will contribute to CBS' decision making process, nor will it deter most fans that are here to see this issue through to the end. For us we have our facts, and an issue, and the agility of a New Media organization.

    29. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by maxume · · Score: 1

      Also, the love triangles are cheap and easy to film, so they get budgeted into the season as filler.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    30. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by HeshWasHere · · Score: 1

      From watching Jericho, I learned that people who live in towns in the mid-west are concerned more with who's screwing who, are selfish, and have no idea how to even operate their own electronic equipment in the state of an emergency. So if this ever really happens, the top priority should be sending a couple city boys to each town.(make sure one's white, and one's african american for political correctness). This way, they can repair any piece of equipment (medical or otherwise), act as hostage negotiaters, teach everone how to shoot a gun properly, be the sole strategic planners, and just commit random acts of heroism each and every day while the townfolk worry about their normal everyday drama such as telling their wives they are having an affair.

    31. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by sherylb33 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe it didn't appeal to you. It did however to 9 million viewers. The rating for the show held steady at number 2 in it's time slot only after AI. Everyone knows that in this day and age the method of rating viewers is broken. They do not count internet viewers, those who watch on Tivo or DVR or on itunes. None of these venues are counted in the 8 million. Today these computer savy viewers need to be counted. Or, do you think that people who take advantage of technology should be cast aside because they live their life and watch TV programs at their convience and not on the networks schedule!! The CBS website for Jericho is the most popular TV websites ever and has been since it was first created. Just so you know I am not gereatric. Although I think that the older viewers are also important comsumers. I think you got the premise of the program all wrong. It is about a small rural community...who is totally cut off from the rest of the country and they have to join together to survive. It is a story of family, friends and neighbors facing and having to survive in this new world that they have directly before them. They are curious about what is going on in other parts of the country but their struggles are for their own community's survival. It is not a story that tell of what's going on in different parts of the country. It is a story of one towns efforts.

    32. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

      CBS was just trying to make the show appealing to all types of audencies. I highly doubt you can find any successful dramas that has never had at least one love triangle. It is a way of expanding the target audience to people who like action, drama, and love triangles. Although there could have been more problems and hardships, many of the things in the show are realistic. The last few episodes focused on a war with a neighboring town, New Born, who were prepairing to take Jericho. Seneriaos like this are what would probably happen if a nuclear attack on the US happens and theres no working government or law enforcement. And besides, if this is how people feel, then bringing the show for another season would present CBS with a shot to listen.

    33. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by HeshWasHere · · Score: 2

      Last time I checked, the internet viewers don't get the same commercials as the "live" viewers. DVR's let you fast forward commercials. What's your point? Advertisers should spend more money on their spots based on who watches it on a medium they don't even advertise on? Also last time I checked, other shows also broadcast on the internet so is there any reason to think that more people watched Jericho on the web then let's say Lost? Maybe you understand where I'm coming from, but you probably don't. Here's something for you to try. You probably think they run the same type of commercials on the Oxygen network as they do on MTV. No matter what age, we're all the same type of consumers, right?

    34. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by HeshWasHere · · Score: 1

      If it became as un-popular as Jericho became, why not take it down? Maybe something twice as good will be put in it's place. Canceling Jericho is a great message to other networks. Don't feed us this crap, cause we won't watch it. Now maybe the next network that has a great premise and plans on ruining it with un-related mushyness and unreleastic behaviors will think twice and actually develop a great series!

    35. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couple things in response to all the focus on "farmer love triangles."

      1) I watched every single episode but never really cared whether Jake and Emily got together. Stanley and Mimi were another story. Their characters were too funny, so I cared because they brought comedy to some otherwise heavy subjects.

      2) What is it that makes your life worth living? Is it knowing where your next meal will come from? Is it having comfortable shelter? Nope. Those are necessities, but those aren't what make your life WORTH living. Our lives are what they are because of the people we love, so spending some of the screen time focusing on relationships is important to the show because it makes us care about the characters. If we don't care about the characters, who gives a flip whether they have electricity or food or the bad guys breathing down their necks. I went from hating Hawkins' character to really, really not wanting him to get caught by the bad guys. That happened because of the redeeming love of his wife and kids.

      Anyway, I've said enough. Thanks for listening, and spend some time remembering this Memorial Day weekend.

    36. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by bigdavesmith · · Score: 1

      I normally don't give cowards any attention, but your comment addresses a valid issue with the current cable system.

      While yes, I agree that what gp is doing is stealing, your comparisons are not valid. I can go to a restaurant and order a chicken salad. I don't just go in, and they ask me if I want the basic meal, the extended meal, or the variety meal, and I can add steak as an option if I choose (ok, maybe in a buffet?).

      The same thing with shoplifting. I don't go into a clothing store and get asked which clothing package I'd like, or if I'd like to save money by bundling my clothing with my cell phone plan. You choose what you want, and pay for it. Everybody's happy.

      With my cable provider, I MUST pay for 200 channels in order to get HBO. I MUST pay for all 50 of the extended tier channels in order to get Sci-Fi. I essentially pay $80 a month for 4 channels I watch. And I do it, because it's worth it to me, but come on. It's not 1990 anymore. If Time Warner wanted to provide me with the level of service where receive and pay for only the channels I want, they could do that. They choose not to. And they're going to start losing more and more money as the result of an outdated business practice, NOT, as you would suggest, the criminal nature of people.

    37. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

      But no, they decided to leave viewers with a completely unsatisfying show by wasting episode after episode on farmer love triangles while civil war, military coups, and nuclear terrorism in the continental United States were apparently too boring to be dealt with until well after many people had given up on the issues ever being talked about again.

      Congratulations, you and grandparent judged a book by it's cover, and also completely missed the point.

      What happens when a town is completely cut off in the middle of such a disaster? well, comes a point there's not all that much they CAN do, bar they get on with what lives they have left, try to deal with their immediate situations as best as possible as their short term survival was more important than worrying so much about the outside world they couldn't safely contact.

      Having said that, that state of affairs was very short lived, and the story really started opening out revealing what really happened, what was happening with the government, and what was happening with neighbouring surviving towns/cities, the brewing civil war, was all coming into play at a very well thought through and realistic feeling pace.

      But oh yeah, that was just as you all turned off.
      They may well drag it on too long eventually, but this show isn't Lost or any other, and you were wrong to judge it as such imo.

    38. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by HeshWasHere · · Score: 1

      1) Yes, because we all know nobody watched any other programs on the internet so Jericho is the only one who would get an increase in numbers. 2) They would have to seperate the ratings. One set for the live broadcast. The second set for the internet. Some adds are time sensitive. The proper fix for the live broadcast ratings would be to increase the size of the neilson panel, not add in internet broadcasts. Has modern technology changed the fact that you can still sit on your couch and watch a live broadcast tv show? If no, then why should rating that be obsolete? 3) Fan resentment? How about the fact of sending a message to the networks that we won't stand for a solid premise being muddled up and turned into a soap opera? Maybe this will make the next set of writers think twice about dummy'ing down a show. The byproduct is the small minority of fans who love soap opera's, like yourself. 4) What's the crises? Determining where to send all the peanuts? I'm sure it was handled by a simple phone call. This was not a solidly ranked show, no matter how you try to pitch it. It bombed pretty bad. Maybe all your barking will get you a resolution to the show from CBS, who knows.

    39. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that in the second half of the season, the truth about Hawkins began coming out and he was no longer a cryptic "Locke" by any means, including WHY the hell he's in Jericho.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    40. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by rawa24 · · Score: 1

      By better show do you mean a show like the ones they have know? Please! I only watch cbs because of Jerico.

    41. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by sherylb33 · · Score: 1

      You are correct in the fact that CBS does collect revenue from advertisers of thier web page not as much as regular tv ratings...my point is that maybe they should!! You are also correct that other shows have broadcasts on the internet ...however, it is a fact that Jericho was consistently rated number one for hits....of ALL OTHER internet broadcast shows. I know that different products advertise in different places. All I was saying is that CBS needs to count online viewers and not dismiss them. With the success that they have had with the broadcasts they should court advertisers to sell in this new forum. They should be embracing the loyal viewers (the consistenly steady numbers) that they have instead of easily dismissing them all. I do not think that they were well enough prepared for the potenial and obivious success of their broadcasts. All I am saying is the current system of things doesn't keep us with the viewers. It is a broken system and it needs to be addressed. you can visit www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_dipslay/telev ision/features/e3ifbfdd1 to see the ratings for the season. Jericho placed number 48 above such shows as Bones and Prison Break and many others that were renewed. Jericho was also consistantly in the top 25 of itune downloads. All I am saying is CBS is losing millions of loyal viewers....and that is what advertisers are trying to reach.

    42. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean city folks like those who lived in New Orleans pre-Katrina? My friends who survived that horror would find your statements unbelievably naive and stupid. They did their best to cope with the unthinkable. And many did not survive despite that. There were many acts of heroism not unlike that portrayed in this fictional drama known as Jericho. Some of them involved the use of guns, as did some of the more depicable acts committed. Some of them involved getting medical equipment up and running.

    43. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by emaname · · Score: 1

      I can't tell you just how good it is to hear someone else make the same observation re "the latest 'pop' show ... for stupid teenagers." I have seen this pattern appear over and over again. I swear the writers for these shows are targeting 14 to 16 year-old girls. But I thought that I was just getting old. (Well, actually, I am getting old, but that's beside the point.)

      I caught the tail-end of the Tavis Smiley Show on PBS yesterday. He was interviewing the producer or director (whatever, I didn't catch his name.) of 'Law and Order.' His comment about why this show has been so phenomenally successful was (listen up all you writers out there) "It's about the writing." He went on to say that the subject matter is taken from the front page of the 'Times.' This is REAL stuff that is being used to write REALLY GOOD scripts.

      And as far as the sponsors go and a demographic with discretionary income goes... how many 14 to 16 year girls are out there buying houses and cars and appliances, you morons?

      This is why I almost always watch PBS now when I do watch TV. I don't want to watch a panel of people humiliating and insulting some delusional 20-something that thinks they're entertaining. I don't want to watch a bunch of losers who are trapped in some sort of bad fantasy island practicing rituals to vote somebody off and acting like it's actually serious.

      Bottom line... When you throw in all the over-the-top macho I've-gotta-have-a-truck commercials, all the absolutely inane self-centered I've-gotta-be-a-model brain washing, all the strobing, fast image clips going to slow mo clips back to fast, yadda, yadda, blah, blah, 98% of commercial TV is utterly useless, non-entertaining, waste.

      Some advice for the Jericho fans... Move on. Go to the library. Read. Learn to think. Stop following the fashion crowd. Get an education. Get a life.

      --
      An effective "democracy" creates the illusion the people have a say in their government.
    44. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      I am guessing that you are not a writer for TV. If you were you would understand that it is their responsibility to appeal to as many viewers as possible.

      They ought to figure out how to appeal to young males, they always whine they are losing them.

    45. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by HeshWasHere · · Score: 1

      Your point exactly? Unless you're telling me that the people of New Orleans were more worried about who's house was going into forclosure or who's girlfriend was sleeping around rather than survival, then I would humbly admit that Jericho WAS a lot like how real life would be. If that's not what you're implying than have another beer and try again but this time don't re-enforce my main point.

    46. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >With my cable provider, I MUST pay for 200 channels in order to get HBO
      But you fail to answer the fundamental question - why "must" you get cable?

      If you want it for the entertainment value, then you buy what they offer - if you don't like it, don't buy it.

      >as the result of an outdated business practice
      This is the current Slashdot rationalization for copyright infringement, services theft, etc. - the idea that somehow, the fact that you don't like the way a company does business entitles you to their products for free.

      I preferred "information wants to be free" - at least that sounds like you're fighting for a cause.

    47. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by sherylb33 · · Score: 1

      The writers did appeal to our two boys (really young men now) who enjoy Jericho. I think that they enjoy the characters struggle between good and evil and the resounding return to humanity that the show offered...they didn't get into the "romance" side of it but that worked well for my daughters. I think it would have been foolish of the writers not to include the characters personal relationships in the story line. It is a show that makes you think about how you would react in similar circumstances? How would your community fare? In todays society I think it is extremely important for young people, to have examples on TV of everyday people in our socity who try to do the right thing even if when it is not the easiest solution. I am sorry that the show didn't appeal to you..maybe next season with the war started would have at least peaked your curiosity enough to tune in for an episode or two.

    48. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by sgt_doom · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Perhaps all those clowns who sent nuts to the show will be so moved as to send bags of Pretzels to George Weasel Bush at the White House.......Of course, I'm sure that might not be as pressing a matter.

      21st Century Reading List:

      The Bush Agenda by Antonia Juhasz, American Dynasty by Kevin Phillips, Blood Money by T. Christian Miller, Hostile Takeover by David Sirota Armed Madhouse by Greg Palast, Jacked and also Other People's Money by Nomi Prins, Confessions of an Economic Hitman by John Perkins, No Place To Hide by Robert O'Harrow, Screwed: The Undeclared War Against The Middle Class Thom Hartmann, War is a Racket by General Smedley Butler, Licensed to Kill by Robert Young Pelton, Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace by Gore Vidal

    49. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by maniac/dev/null · · Score: 1

      yet the show was being "the O.C. after the bomb".

      Don't call it that.

      Perhaps the fans just need some analrapy sessions to help them get over the loss of the show.

    50. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Grandparent:

      Checking my iTunes library, it looks like I stopped at "The Day Before". 13 episodes watched, and I just couldn't stand it anymore.

      Parent:

      Ummmm - did you even watch the show? It sounds like you watched the first 3 to 4 episodes and left it at that.

      Umm... did you even read the comment? It sounds like you read the first 3 or 4 sentences and left it at that.
    51. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by dwcarless · · Score: 4, Informative

      1 (and part of 4)) No matter how you cut it, it is a top 50 or top 25 show. At a minimum, it is higher rated than 2/3 of everything else on TV.

      2 Nielsen is obsolete because even if one watches on TV, it could be Tivo'd. Nielsen captures an ever DECREASING portion of televsion viewers -- those that actually sit on a couch and watch a show as it airs. New Media viewers don't schedule their time around a network. Nielsen is a dinosaur in the Old Media world.

      3 There are no stats to argue this, so we will just have to agree to disagree

      4 CBS' crisis is more that 20,000 pounds of peanuts. It is a public releations nightmare. Full page ads are in this coming Tuesday's Variety Weekly and Hollywood Review. News coverage is already jumped to mainstream with ABC and (ironically) all major CBS affliciates running it. Power blogger Michelle Malkin has front paged it, which means Drudge will follow shortly. Love them or hate them, they command 20+ million hits per day between them. CBS is stuck in neutral and cannot pimp their new season lineup until they resolve this.

    52. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by kalaf · · Score: 1

      My personal approach to the problem is to stop watching TV. If they want me to watch, they can damn well promote the kinds of shows I like. Firefly would be worth a monthly $40 cable bill. Reality dating shows being delievered over something I'm paying for (and thus causing me to partially fund them) has a negative dollar value. When a month of cable seems like a great deal, I'll jump on board. Until then, I'm spending my money elsewhere.

    53. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by eepok · · Score: 1

      Look, we get that some people don't like love story to interrupt their action and gigantic fires, but Jericho is a realistic story about a fictional place. If the majority of American civilization were to suddenly disappear, all imports and exports were to halt, and you were essentially left alone in your city with a bunch of singles, wouldn't you try to hook up? Wouldn't other people try to hook up with you or your "target"?

      Yes, they would. The main character (a reluctant leader with a bad past and a scruffy face) is single and is quite likely going to try to get it going with his former flame.

      When bad things go down, people try to get booty before they die. They lose their inhibitions. Jericho isn't a movie where a love triangle will take up 1 of 2.5 hours... it's a series where it will instead take up 2 of 24.

    54. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With my cable provider, I MUST pay for 200 channels in order to get HBO.

      Not anymore. "[A] provision of the 1992 Cable Acts, says cable operators can no longer require subscribers to buy multitier packages of programming to get pay-per-view events and premium channels, such as as HBO, Starz, and Showtime."

      Source: Businessweek http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov 2002/tc2002116_0167.htm

    55. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by darkmeridian · · Score: 3, Informative

      The parent refers to the following exchange from Arrested Development:

      Tobias Fünke: Michael if I may take off my pants and pull my analrapist stocking over my head, I think George Michael may be suffering from what we in the soft-sciences call "Obsessive Compulsive Disorder", or the "The O.C. Disorder."
      Michael: Don't call it that.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    56. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by kinglink · · Score: 1

      Thank you. This is very show, Jericho jumped before it was on the air. The reason for this is it tried to be a political, no wait it tried to have good family value.... no wait, Love triangles.... no, show how similar post apocalyptic society is like present day...

      The thing that really drove me up the wall is they took mini potshots at the president and then changed the meaning of it so it's sort of like a "we were just kidding back then" so if you don't watch the whole episode you just get the political commentary. The only really interesting character was the black guy, and his story turned out to be a real dud. The town was interesting but even Skeet Ulrich who I like turned out to be a dud. I'm glad it's off so i don't have to decide if I wanted to continue to watch it.

      Now if someone makes a new Post-apocalyptic show, maybe fallout (the game) based, I'm in.

    57. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am guessing that you are not a writer for TV


      I'm guessing you didn't notice the show was canceled. And the number one breakout hit of the season is Heroes, which was written exactly the way Jericho SHOULD have been written -- taking an exciting premise and actually exploring it. Putting normal people we can recognize and identify with and throwing intensely crazy situations at them to see how they handle it. Characters developed over time, reacted to the amazing situation they were in, adapted, acted to try and change things (both for good and ill) and became drivers of the story at some times wile being pulled along by events larger than themselves at others. That's how you write compelling fiction.

      I can't think of any character in Jericho that actually had a decent character arc of any kind, that changed in any significant way. It's a town full of stoic men and women who rise to the situation and have lots of mysterious military training that allows them to solve any problem without having to do any particularly hard work or make any tough choices. We're told through flashbacks that many of them were different people BEFORE the story we're seeing now, but that isn't the same thing as getting to know a character as one thing (and liking or hating them for it) and then watching them grow into something else due to the circumstances and their own choices.

      And yes, I have written fiction professionally before (and will again). I went to school for, among other things, writing. I love purely character-based stories. But you can't spend so much time navel-gazing that you lose track of the actual plot for huge portions of the screen time. You can't sell a story as "The world is going to end in nuclear war! How will America survive?" and then deliver Green Acres crossed with 90210.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    58. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      What happens when a town is completely cut off in the middle of such a disaster?


      That's a great premise for a show, and why we tuned in. Where were the tough moral choices? Nobody in the entire town seemed to sacrifice anything more significant than electricity, and even that is hardly noticed or noted on. They all still have clean clothes, there's no disease other than radiation sickness. How is the local accountant going to contribute to such a society? How is he going to earn his food, take care of his family? If there was some new guy in town who seemed to mysteriously know everything that was going on, don't you think a few folks with pitchforks and torches would show up on his front lawn demanding answers?

      Sorry if you don't like it being compared to LOST, but to everyone else the comparison seems pretty obvious. You could swap Hawkins and Locke and I doubt anyone would notice, their only jobs are to be mysterious and make people think there is some vast interesting story that might someday be told if only the viewers put up with 7 or 8 seasons of pretty young actors having love affairs.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    59. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I LIKE cheesey sci-fi, you insensitive clod!

    60. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by sherylb33 · · Score: 0

      Hi... I hope that you can appreciate that there are people who view TV programs for only entertainment purposes. Every member of my family enjoys Jericho and finds something that appeals to them. I do watch Heroes but only with my oldest child..and my husband does not care for it. I feel that parts of the story line and content of Hereos are not suitable for my younger children.....especially the girl who "dies" but never really does. A very close family member passed away about 8 months ago and I feel that it would be confusing for them.. My children do have a fairly good grasp on the concept of fiction and non-fiction but I see no real benefit of muddying their perceptions. Jericho is a story that leads to discussion with my kids. They ask questions and the show really makes them think. I am for anything that accomplishes that. Jericho is a story where the characters seem to understand the importance of humanity. Especially when faced with having to find solutions to difficult problems. It is a lesson that I think all people should be reminded of. We choose to use TV as an occasional form of entertainment. We enjoy reading and movies also. I am a mother of five children and I work everyday with "real characters" and their experiences all day....sometimes I just want to relax and enjoy a story and not pick it apart fault by fault. There are more people who watched Jericho than Bones or Prison Break and many other programs that were renewed for another season....(ratings listed on the Hollywood Reporter web site) I think that CBS really messed up and we are exercising our rights as Americans in letting CBS know that we think so. My children are getting a lesson in what the term boycott means. It sounds like an exciting path you travel and I wish you well on it.

    61. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by triso · · Score: 1

      ...and then deliver Green Acres crossed with 90210.

      Wow! What a great concept. I'll buy that. Can you come by my office on Tuesday and we'll pitch it to the networks?

    62. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      Oh, I certainly don't disparage anyone who does enjoy the show, and I'd agree that (ironically) it is a more family-friendly show than Heroes. It's just that with a premise that involves nuclear terrorism and basically a post-apocalyptic survival scenario, a lot of us were expecting it to be a bit more hard edged and mature than it turned out to be. My expectations for the story were certainly a lot more intense and morally frustrating, I went into it understanding CBS was trying to attract 18-35 males to the network.

      It may be that CBS thought they were in a bit of a pickle in terms of viewership -- the demographics of those who could enjoy it as broadcast may have included a lot of folks who found the premise not suitable for family TV and weren't willing to give it a chance.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    63. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by bigdavesmith · · Score: 1

      But you fail to answer the fundamental question - why "must" you get cable?
      I had no idea I needed to answer that question in order to make my point. If you read my original post, however, you'll see that the reason I get cable is because it's worth the cost to me.

      This is the current Slashdot rationalization for copyright infringement, services theft, etc. - the idea that somehow, the fact that you don't like the way a company does business entitles you to their products for free.
      No, the this you cite, my post, is me telling you that if I think your company stinks, you're probably not going to get my money. Not only that, but if your stuff is lying around on the net, and I can get away with it, guess what... I'm gonna download it.

      I think (and I don't mean this as an insult) that you have a very limited and traditional view of business models. Mitsubishi makes a ton of stuff, including cars. I loved the 2000 Eclipse when it came out (still do). The product that Mitsubishi provided had a value in a fairly traditional manner. If I wanted an eclipse, I could buy one for about $30k, or steal one. Because stealing one would probably mean spending more time in jail then in the car, I don't consider that a legitimate option. So the value of the car is $30k, I spend it, and I own the product.

      Now if my neighbor had an eclipse in his garage, and I could just make a copy of it in my garage, and the odds were greatly in my favor that nobody would ever notice, do you think the car would still be worth $30k to me? The answer is: Hells No. Would people keep paying the $30k for Eclipses? Not where I'm from. Mitsubishi would then have a problem. I don't care if the answer is to bulldoze every car-copying-garage, or arrest every car-copier, lower prices, invent new cars, whatever. The point is, Mitsubishi is making less money because of the way the world is.

      Now I know that's a silly example because we can't copy cars, and I'm probably going to get replies who tell me that my analogy is incorrect because of 8010 reasons, but my point is there. Please, and seriously, think it over. If it makes me a bad person because I think that way, so be it, but it's just that simple, and I don't feel like it puts me on the list to go to hell. And no, I don't need a cause. I'm just watching TV.

    64. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by madura32 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you, and many other people out there are more happy with canned, formulaic garbage that seems to pepper our airwave. teen garbage, sitcoms likt Seinfeld, and lawyer/science dramas every night roll past, without one thought to originally or creativity. Jericho was excellent. It took a small town, like many people live in, and sent them back into the 19th century. The characters were creative and well written. What do people have with love interest. Do you think that everyone is going to quit being intetrested in the opposte sex. How about the young man that started out as the town dork, only to rise above everyone else and become one of the real powers in the town. How about the IRS agent that had to cope with the loss of everyone and everything she knew, and was force to adapt to living on a farm. Then there was the town criminal, the neighboring town, and lets not forget the CIA agent that was trying to stop all the bombs. With the loss of Jericho, television viewers do not deserve anything better. Everyone can sit on their fat asses, turn off their brains, and vote for the next American Idol / Survivor / latest piece of intellectual garbage that the networks force onto the airwaves.

    65. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by dangitman · · Score: 1

      but what people want to know is, will Jake hook up with the blonde or the brunette? And what impact would post-apocalyptic panic have on rural thanksgiving celebrations?"

      Executive Gamma: It's funny but is it going to get them off their tractors?
      Executive Alpha: 80% likely.
      Executive Gamma: It will play in Peoria.
      Executive Beta: Game shows are back!

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    66. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by feepness · · Score: 0, Troll

      It really saves on the cable bill - I don't get one because I don't have cable. Believe me, the worthwhile stuff filters through the great sieve of BitTorrent and I don't find myself on a Saturday afternoon watching some shite made-for-TV nonsense on the Sci-Fi Channel.

      Exhibit A in where socialism falls on it's face. Yeah, there are lots of examples for the other -isms too.

      It really saves on worrying about a paycheck - I don't get one because I don't have a job. Believe me, the worthwhile stuff can be easily stolen from parked cars/unoccupied houses and I don't find myself on a Saturday afternoon watching what I'm drinking because I might be too hungover for work.

    67. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by humblecoder · · Score: 1


      Some advice for the Jericho fans... Move on. Go to the library. Read. Learn to think. Stop following the fashion crowd. Get an education. Get a life.


      Chill out, buddy. Now if you want to watch Guy Smiley or whatever on PBS, then more power to you. If so called "commercial TV" is not to your liking, then you are certainly entitled to your opinion since it is your life after all. However, there is no reason to get all in all worked up about other people's choices in entertainment.

      Sure you say you don't like American Idol or Survivor or whatever, but does its existence somehow diminish your life in any way? After all, if you are not tuning in, then it would seem as if those shows should have no impact on your happiness or lack thereof. Personally, I am not a big fan of American Idol either, so its existence is totally irrelevant to me. If people want to watch it, then that's their perogative, and who am I to tell others what they should and shouldn't like. Nobody appointed me the arbiter of taste, and nobody has appointed you to that position either.

      For the record I did watch Jericho, and yes it did have its lame moments. However, the thing that I did like about it is that it got you to think about what the world would be like if a nuclear holocaust were to occur. Could it have been more gritty and realistic? Sure it could of. Did it spend a disproportional amount on soap opera-y stuff? Possibly, yes. However, I think that one thing that it did was it provided some food for thought about how normal people might react to a disaster.

      Without the pressure that a stable society exerts, the true natures of the characters came through. Some people rose to the ocassion and banded together in order to maintain a certain semblance of community and society. Others, freed from the constraints of society, ended up descending into a more barbaric existence. I have never been in a disaster situation, but you always here about some people who do whatever it takes to help their fellow man, while others take advantage of the situation for their own profit. I think the show portrayed that quite well, although it was peppered with a lot of ancillary storylines which sometimes detracted from the show. However, that is the nature of art. Sometimes you just have to take away what you can from it and just ignore the rest.

      So anyway, I will end this post by throwing your challenge to "learn to think" back in your face. Rather than just blindly discarding "98%" or commercial TV as being useless or whatever, why not keep your eyes open for opportunities for learning and thinking in places were you never thought to look because you were too close minded.

    68. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I think your attitude is honestly dishonest and understandable. I mean to say, I've been there and done that (watched TV shows from bit-torrent). I didn't really feel guilty about it at the time, though when I think about it I have to admit it was against the law and unethical.

      What I find hypocritical is the Slashdotters who get all indignant when the content owners crack down on Joe Sixpack, and then get equally indignant when somebody like an essay checking service stores a copy of a student's work for free. I'm not saying you personally hold this position, but many Slashdotters do.

      As for a business model that works in the real world, expect to see most of the revenue generated from product placement. Sucks, but there's no free lunch, and I can't fault the producers for making a buck.

    69. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that doesn't sound too bad, but the "Blown-the-hell-up-90210" part sounds painful.


      I thought Jericho was similar to the tv show, Jeremiah (with Luke Perry) in a lot of ways. They had betrayals, love stories, growing friendships, several enemies, apocalypse survival and a growing friendship with a black man who wasn't quite honest at first.
    70. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I caught the tail-end of the Tavis Smiley Show on PBS yesterday. Huh. Tavis Smiley. He's what you get when you combine Jesse Jackson and Charlie Rose.
    71. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      So to you, not having cable is the equivalent of being a bum and being a burglar?

      Boy, you are a cunt.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    72. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      If I could buy just the shows I watch, I'd gladly part with a few bucks for each of them. But I'm not going to pay nearly a thousand dollars a year to watch the average 24 one-hour episodes I watch in any given year. It's a bad deal, and as you say, if it's laying around the net, I'm gonna look.

      Or, if the episodes of say, The Sopranos or Deadwood were available with advertising support, I'd gladly watch the adverts and support the sponsors, as long as the shows came in the same quality in which they were broadcast.

      I know it's not your example, bigdave, but the AC who compared downloading a bittorrent of a downsampled episode of the Sopranos to ordering a meal and skipping out on the bill is simply full of shit. I'd put it in a more genteel way, but I've had a long day of sitting in the sun drinking 3.2 beer. That, and the Sopranos is coming on now.

      As is the case with music, when I can buy it directly from the artist, I'm happy to pay for music, but I will not enrich Sony or Time-Warner or any of the others from the entertainment/industrial complex. I'm doing my best to see the entire intellectual property system collapse, so it's actually a moral decision I've made.

      If you feel guilt over downloading a BT (not you, bigdave, but the industry sockpuppets that post in these discussions, comparing downloading a torrent to stealing the milk from a starving baby), then you are either deranged or lying.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    73. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by nyekulturniy · · Score: 1

      But... did the show make enough money to be worth the production costs?

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
    74. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Car54 · · Score: 1

      Jericho is the best show. Now there are 25,000 pounds of nuts having been bought. All major media is now picking up the story. SAVE JERICHO

    75. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      It really saves on worrying about a paycheck - I don't get one because I don't have a job. Believe me, the worthwhile stuff can be easily stolen from parked cars/unoccupied houses and I don't find myself on a Saturday afternoon watching what I'm drinking because I might be too hungover for work.

      Doesn't work.

      Seriously -- life as a criminal isn't nearly as good as a lot of people seem to believe it is. It's a tough way to make a living in anything but the very short run. Pretty much any way you could think of to make money via crime has (A) already been thought of and tried, and (B) is unsustainable. Either you can make a lot of money for a very short amount of time, and run a large risk of being caught and imprisoned, or you can only make small amounts of money. (There's an interesting study referenced in "Freakonomics" where the average salary of a street-level gang member is computed -- turns out it's less than flipping burgers at McD's.) If there were ways to make large amounts of money, quickly, with low risk, simply by being immoral or amoral, there'd be a line from New York to Kansas City to sign up.

      It's just that on the whole, you can do a lot better for yourself, provided you're a reasonably intelligent person, in a legitimate occupation than you can dealing drugs or knocking over convenience stores, or stealing cars.

      The reason the system works is because it's advantageous -- or at least perceived as advantageous -- to play by the rules in the long run.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    76. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by feepness · · Score: 1

      No, I was comparing it not having cable and stealing the shows you watch. I actually have no problem with BitTorrent provided you have previously paid to access to the shows you are downloading.

      Granted the magnitude of the two examples was different but I was going for the whole hyperbole thing to demonstrate the point.

      Calling me a cunt doesn't change the fact that you aren't paying for what you're using.

    77. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by kefler · · Score: 1

      Actually most of what you mentioned there did happen in the show. They did for example almost fully explain Hawkin's point of view and his role in the attacks. It did lead to bigger questions, but it is not like LOST where each character has 50 layers of 'secrets'. Based on what you list I'd say you watched episodes 1,2 and 3.

    78. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Calling me a cunt doesn't change the fact that you aren't paying for what you're using.

      I was just trying for clarity and precision of language.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    79. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      I watched the majority of episodes of the show. Yes, they explained Hawkins role in the attacks, which really answered nothing but the mechanics of how he got from DC to Jericho and got back together with his ex-wife. We already knew he had the bomb, that he was involved in the attacks, and that he was working for someone else. He seems content to just sit around with all the answers to everything that is happening and not do anything about it until a crisis happens, when he comes riding in on a white horse and solves the problem.

      Nothing else I mentioned was covered. The kid with the grocery store is the only one who has actually made any tough choices and changed at all through the season. Everyone else is exactly the same as they were before the bombs went off (well, the new Mayor very recently started realizing things were no longer about politics, but he hasn't been put in any situations to test that).

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    80. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by nwf · · Score: 1

      And the number one breakout hit of the season is Heroes, which was written exactly the way Jericho SHOULD have been written -- taking an exciting premise and actually exploring it.

      Heroes is, IMHO, going the same way of Jericho. (Creating plot by making characters stupid.) For the last half of the season, we've been hunting Sylar. Sure, it was fun for a while, but it's ANNOYING now. Despite numerous ready-made opportunities to do away with him, inluding Dr. Dumb (that being Mohinder), who tried to kill him, failed, and then left Sylar unconcious on the floor! And in the season finale, we see Hero do a lame job at killing him (after all that talk of family honor and saving the world) and, Sylar escapes again (granted, he's wounded.)

      Despite a near infinite amount of very cool things they could do, season 2 will likely be a reash of the last half of season 1: kill big bad Sylar. Bo-ring! I've about had it with Heroes, and I don't really care if it ever returns for season two.

      Now, granted, Jericho had a worse case of writer errosion than Heroes, but it's spreading.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    81. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by SteelMaggie · · Score: 1
      Really GREAT point! I also almost stopped watching Jericho because of the lame 'who-loves-who' stuff. Good heavens! If a nuke just went off, you probably wouldn't be thinking about anything but survival. Some strange figment of loyalty drew me back after the hiatus and I was amazed! The shows got progressively more and more realistic and interesting. I would strongly encourage you to watch the last 10 episodes on CBS Innertube:
      http://www.cbs.com/innertube/player.php?cat=115191 &vid=&format=&auto=1

      After you watch a couple of episodes, join us and see what you can do to save the show!

      If you decide that you still don't like the show, that is fine! Just realize what we are really fighting for here:

      If you have ever had a show cancelled without warning--this is your fight!

      If you are tired of Network TV deciding what is entertaining--this is your fight!

      If you want to force TV giants to consider its Internet audiences as an important demographic--this is your fight!

      Join us! http://www.jericholives.com/

    82. Re:Jericho *was* Nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last laugh's on you - Jericho fans have brought back a great show despite your obvious dislike for it. Do you think this show would have won such a loyal and vocal following if it truly was "Nuts" as you say? I don't THINK so... Just admit that your taste is "all in your mouth" (as they say) and let it go.

  2. What a waste of food. by dsanfte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously.

    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    1. Re:What a waste of food. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The power of idiocy compels you!!!!

      I must admit with great shame that I have a vague idea who this jericho person is. God I wish I didn't. FUCKING IDIOTS!

    2. Re:What a waste of food. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having been one of said poor people I can tell you that 90% of the food will go to drug addicts, who will then sell their food vouchers for more drugs.

      The part that's going to Afghanistan will save the US government from spending money on troops so that they can spend it on tools to wage war, leaving thousands of natives even more hungry.

      Damn right it's going to waste. You preppies talk about getting down off your cross, you don't know shit until you've lived it, you watch too much TV.

    3. Re:What a waste of food. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh, that shut you up huh.

    4. Re:What a waste of food. by palewook · · Score: 1

      you might want to read what cbs is doing with the food before deciding that. its being used to feed homeless. which isnt a waste.

    5. Re:What a waste of food. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >you don't know shit until you've lived it

      How does one "live shit"? By method acting?

    6. Re:What a waste of food. by maxume · · Score: 1

      There are 300 million people in the U.S. Make the ludicrous assumption that each of them eats only 1 pound of food a week. That's 15.6 billion pounds of food a year; 8.8 million tons of it.

      A dozen tons here, a dozen tons there, not even a consideration. Way to rock the platitude though.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:What a waste of food. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paledork, did you even read my post?

      I was one of those homeless people, and the food that the charities give goes mostly to drug users who can now afford to trade their government supplied food certificates for cash, to buy more drugs.

      You're fucken clueless, and you can't read.

    8. Re:What a waste of food. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh well if you actually are starving, you appreciate a slice of free food, no matter how small. I survived for a whole year on 2 cups of rice per week when I managed to get off the streets, so 1 pound (~2.2kgs for the rest of the world) isn't so ludicrous to some.

      Not to mention that you counted only one country, counted a country far from being the most effected by lack of food, and counted the entire country and not just the homeless who need the food.

      Nice stats you got going there.

      Another fucken clueless preppy yank dickhead. Go ask your Mommy for a new SUV or something.

    9. Re:What a waste of food. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's your contribution huh? That's what you brought? Seriously, is the best you could add to a discussion about starvation that you directly contribute to, to pick petty holes in linguistics?

      You "live shit" by doing just that. Preppy fucks might refer to it as gaining first-hand experience. Feel free to mentally replace the word "shit" with "things" like anyone with a decent grasp of commonplace slang would have already done.

      Fuck off. It's called colloquialism, bitch. You already knew that, but you piped up anyway, like a good little bitch would. I can out-troll you anyday n00b. /. says: "It's been 21 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment" ... Please think of some more ways to school this little toy and try posting again afterwards.

    10. Re:What a waste of food. by maxume · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point. Americans scrape 9 tons of food off their plates into the trash each night. This is, both figuratively and literally, peanuts.

      If the world were like 50 tons short of feeding everybody and this kind of thing went on, I might throw up my arms in disgust, but people are so miserably wasteful that this really isn't worth any consideration. The numbers are so large that it doesn't even matter.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  3. Hyperbole Ho! by richdun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is expected to become the largest ever fan campaign to bring a television show back from cancellation.

    Stop me when I've mentioned a fan campaign you've actually heard of. Like the campaign to get the third season of the original Star Trek. Or the one that got a Space Shuttle renamed. Or all those DVDs that got Family Guy back in regular episodes and Futurama in direct-to-DVD movies. Or the ridiculous amount of money Save Enterprise raised that threatened to make the fifth season purely on fan money (which, of course, led to all the controversy, but eh).

    TV shows get cancelled. Millions are outraged. Then millions forget until Fox screws up the next show.

    Wait, CBS you say? Weird. The token /. response doesn't work here. I think teh slash-verse is going to assplode!

    1. Re:Hyperbole Ho! by STrinity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just look at what happens to shows that have been "saved" -- the third season of Star Trek contains all the worst episodes, including Spock's Brain and The Children Shall Lead. Battlestar Galactica came back as Galactica 1980, which even the most hardcore fans like to pretend didn't exist. Buffy made the jump to UPN after the WB axed it, and the result was an absolute train-wreck. And the new Family Guy episodes are painfully unfunny.

      Let it go.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    2. Re:Hyperbole Ho! by timmyandrosi · · Score: 1

      point = missed. Its not whether you actually like the show or not. 9 million people did plus a huge online community. Its about a network not accouting for the new age of use and how they consume entertainment. Duh! I can name you 100 shows that i hate and wish were not on TV. Jericho was a great show to millions of people. And should stay on the network. CBS messed up how they handled it. Next year it will be something you like that will be cancelled for silly reasons. As far as campaigns are concerned. Those campaigns look forever to get going. This campaign happened , organized and showed results in 2 days. 2 DAYS. Have you any concept of what that is? or what that takes. As I said point missed. Its not about liking the show or not. Tim

    3. Re:Hyperbole Ho! by Susan+in+Pittsburgh · · Score: 1

      In 1983, the series Cagney & Lacey was canceled by CBS and was subsequently brought back to the prime time schedule after fans of the show staged a major letter-writing campaign. That show went on to earn 36 Emmy nominations and 14 wins during its run. But I am not rooting for the recall of Jericho because I think it will win an Emmy or Spawn as many Spinoffs as Star Trek, I am rooting because I want the networks to realize and acknowledge that the way they count viewers is flawed. I watched Jericho on the web on CBS' website (innertube) which they conveniently forgot to count into their ratings (as well as Tivo & DVR and iTunes)You see I am not my grandmother, the Nielson box (which recorded 9 million viewers at it's ebb and 12 at it's peak for this series) doesn't apply. And I sure as hell don't think they canceled due to ratings alone, I think it was bagged in favor of a "CHEAP ALTERNATIVE" The reality show costs little money compared to a serial drama, and also seems to hold it's own today (but really Kid Nation ?? 18 to 49 yr olds are gonna love THAT!)

    4. Re:Hyperbole Ho! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I don't get this "they don't count tivo & dvr" If you use those, you still have to tune the channel, right? And isn't nielson a journal-based rating system anyway?

      I do agree that nielson is backwards technology in today's environment though. You only sample a population when you can't measure the whole thing, and you only take a small sample when a large one is impractical. But cable and satellite use is something like over 50% of households, and every one of 'em has a networked computer by definition. So there's no reason why that can't be the sample. Heck, I'd switch to a cable company that aggregated my viewing habits, since that would mean that my opinion on shows would actually count.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Hyperbole Ho! by HeshWasHere · · Score: 1

      The one thing you're forgetting is that all the shows you mentioned above are shows that resolve themselves each episode. Jericho does not have stand-alone episodes. The longer it's off the air, the more likely it will never come back. This kind of show requires retention from previous episodes to understand what's going on. And that retention took a dive as the season progressed.

    6. Re:Hyperbole Ho! by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I don't think that Buffy was 'saved' by hardcore fans. WB gave it up, and UPN picked it up. I'm also not sure in what way it became a train-wreck. Viewership was reduced? Of course! UPN wasn't a widespread network at the time. Family Guy jokes aren't funny? Is that a symptom of being 'saved'? Or is it the writers simply being out of ideas?

      Shows are saved because the network realizes that there's enough of a fanbase to give it another shot. If it doesn't work out the second time, they're probably gone for good. But Family Guy, for example, seems to be working out, even if you don't find the jokes that great anymore.

    7. Re:Hyperbole Ho! by Octopus · · Score: 1

      Or the ridiculous amount of money Save Enterprise raised that threatened to make the fifth season purely on fan money (which, of course, led to all the controversy, but eh). ALL they had to do was replace the theme song. That's it. It was like a moldy booger smeared onto the beginning of the show. I had to leave the room when it came on.

      The rest of the show was great, but tainted by the intro, every god damn time.

    8. Re:Hyperbole Ho! by ShaggyIan · · Score: 1

      Any time you hear someone bitching about how the networks count people, please inform them that THE NETWORKS DON'T COUNT PEOPLE! Nielsen does, and television is at their mercy. You can't just add your web numbers in, because all the ad agencies have copies of the Nielsen books. I'm sure the networks get reports of legitimate web plays (e.g. iTunes), and probably try to increase ad rates based on them. Until the ad agencies care about web views (which are frequently commercial free), free web streaming just reduces potentially Nielsen counted eyeballs.

      As someone who works in television. . . They know it sucks. Nielsen stinks. It is easily manipulated and increasingly irrelevant. But they are the only game in town. Feel free to create some competition. Please.

      In addition, feel free to blame the advertisers who participate in the "ratings points == ad rates" game. TV raises rates on good ratings, advertisers demand lower rates on bad ratings.

      --

      This sig was generated randomly by one million monkeys with Speak 'n Spells. . .
    9. Re:Hyperbole Ho! by Kelson · · Score: 1

      As far as I can recall, there was no fan campaign to save Buffy after Season 5. I don't even remember hearing about it being "canceled." It just switched networks.

      There was a campaign to save Angel after its last season, but it (obviously) didn't succeed.

    10. Re:Hyperbole Ho! by Susan+in+Pittsburgh · · Score: 1

      Fine, I misspoke, here is what I really must have wanted to say (according to you) I want the networks to realize and acknowledge that the way Nielsen counts viewers is not at all accurate, because there are plenty of us who think outside of the Nielsen Box. I also do not comprehend the creation and maintenance of a website to provide viewers with an alternate source of viewing being ignored in the ratings game. Does that satisfy your need to have my words conform to your thought processes? Susan "N.U.T.S.(Not Understand Term Surrender)" ~ General Anthony C. McAuliffe CMDR 101st Airborne Division Battle of Bastogne, Belgium, during the Battle of the Bulge in World War II Thank You Gen McAuliffe for your service, and all of those who have, are and will fight for my freedom.

    11. Re:Hyperbole Ho! by ShaggyIan · · Score: 1

      Nope. Still missing the point a bit.

      The pivotal point is that Nielsen is in no way controlled by the networks. Ratings points come from Nielsen, and Nielsen doesn't care about anything other than their boxes/journals.

      I want the networks to realize and acknowledge that the way Nielsen counts viewers is not at all accurate
      They do. They hate Nielsen. They are slaves to the ratings.

      I'm amazed that the networks even offer shows on their web pages, as they know it won't be counted by Nielsen. I'm guessing that their online activities are actually an active attempt to subvert Nielsen. Unfortunately, the only thing advertisers care about are the Nielsen ratings. Those ratings set ad rates, and ad rates are the income for television.

      What I try to teach folks is that the networks have no involvement in ratings other that making and promoting their product. If you would like web viewings counted into the ratings, then the word "network" need not be in your sentence. You need to yell at Nielsen.

      --

      This sig was generated randomly by one million monkeys with Speak 'n Spells. . .
    12. Re:Hyperbole Ho! by Susan+in+Pittsburgh · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info.

  4. Did you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Did you know peanuts are actually completely deadly, quite contrary to their more mainstream position as being considered an edible and tasty snack/spread/ingredient?

    1. Re:Did you know... by SetupWeasel · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know! I have a friend that can't be in the same room with them. They're the devils testicles, they are!

    2. Re:Did you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who are alergic to peanuts should be culled, preventing future generations of genetic halfbreeds

    3. Re:Did you know... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Never heard them called that. Thanks for making me chuckle this early saturday-morning-at-work.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Did you know... by Th0racl3 · · Score: 1

      My whole family loved the show. It was ridiculous to have such a long break inbetween episodes. I sent a few pounds of nuts and donated to the nut drive. That nut salesman has done a good job lol but please he is 1 happy dude that show got cancelled. He has sold 20 tons of nuts in 1 week and wants this fight to last forever.

  5. It's a TV Show by techsoldaten · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a TV show. Get over it. They cancelled Firefly, now Jericho is gone. As an alternative, these people should consider:

    1) Going to the gym
    2) Taking a loved one out to dinner
    3) Taking up art
    4) Relaxing with friends over the internet
    5) Fixing some of those pesky things around the house
    6) Getting a dog for companionship instead of a television
    7) Volunteering for experiments on drugs to treat obsessive compulsive disorder
    8) Going for a walk in the woods and experiencing nature
    9) Getting a tan

    There are so many other things to do in life that worry about a man soap opera.

    M

    1. Re:It's a TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'll get modded troll because some asshat is offended, but I just want to let you knomw to not get discouraged, you posted the truth man.... lots of these assfucks need to get laid (especially the mods it seems).

      posting as AC because i'm druck as fuck.

    2. Re:It's a TV Show by idonthack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      10. Fix the government
      11. Various charity organizations
      12. Protest something that matters

      and of course

      13. Profit

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    3. Re:It's a TV Show by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I'm druck as fuck.

      So you're a drunk duck who got laid then? Most ACs are not that lucky. :P

    4. Re:It's a TV Show by catbutt · · Score: 1

      I don't care about the show (never actually seen it), but I have respect for consumers of anything that gather together and take action when a corporation screws them. Ending a season on a cliffhanger and not then cancelling is, in my opinion, a breach of trust...people invested time in the show under the assumption that they would not be left hanging. And so what that "it's only a TV show". I'm sure there are plenty of things that you care about that other people would find trivial. (getting a tan? gee, that's not superficial or anything....)

    5. Re:It's a TV Show by bdo19 · · Score: 1

      I agree 110%. This is all WAY too much effort over a TV show.

      The "what a waste of food" comment above was also right on. Not to mention money.

    6. Re:It's a TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 yuo

    7. Re:It's a TV Show by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is all way too much effort over THAT PARTICULAR TV show.

      Jericho was crap. Good riddance.

    8. Re:It's a TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >6) Getting a dog for companionship instead of a television

      You can get dogs for televisions, now? Wow. Those new flexible LCDs are cool!

    9. Re:It's a TV Show by ScottyMcScott · · Score: 0

      or how about donating that money towards a charity or non profit for a good cause....seriously over 26K in a pooled campaign and 9K ad? pathetic.

    10. Re:It's a TV Show by Mr+Jazzizle · · Score: 1

      says you, a guy on sladshot. :P

    11. Re:It's a TV Show by badasscat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      (getting a tan? gee, that's not superficial or anything....)

      The difference is it doesn't cost $19,000 or $26,000 or whatever to get a tan... and if it does, whoever spends that much deserves all the ridicule they get. You could feed a family of four on that much money for a year - and we have no shortage of needy people in this country.

      I'm not the kind of guy that goes around pointing out how all these vanity things we do are bad because that money could be better used elsewhere. Hey, if it makes you feel good, then whatever. But still, there's got to be a limit... a point where you say, "you know, this is kind of a ridiculous; there are more important things to worry about." It's not as if these people are getting anything tangible for their investment. They're sending a corporation a bunch of nuts. At least if you spent $26,000 on a tan, you'd still end up with a tan to show for it. These people may as well have just taken all that money and flushed it down the toilet. And that makes the whole thing kind of offensive.

      I'll bet they're all really proud of themselves too.

    12. Re:It's a TV Show by doktorjayd · · Score: 1

      +1

    13. Re:It's a TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to let you in on a little secret.

      Different people have different priorities.

      You're ridiculing these fans for putting something together to try and save a show they love? Boy, you really don't want to be around when fans of sports get upset then.

      (BTW - instead of posting on slashdot, which achieves nothing, you could have been doing one of your suggestions. Ask yourself why you did this instead, and that should answer pretty much why these fans did this).

    14. Re:It's a TV Show by the_unknown_soldier · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you really want these people trying to fix government?

    15. Re:It's a TV Show by hachete · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also, whilst tanning, read a fucking book.

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    16. Re:It's a TV Show by GNious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Current US Government under 9 tonnes of peanuts? .... Not A Bad Idea methinks

      /Nc

    17. Re:It's a TV Show by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      0) Read a book. If you want good SF, you could just start with the Hugo Award winners. At your local bookshop or library. But that will make you dissatisfied with what is presented as SF on network TV....

    18. Re:It's a TV Show by Bartab · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also, whilst tanning, read a fucking book. On skin cancer.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    19. Re:It's a TV Show by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      PS. The Hugos (above) are awarded by a vote of fans. The Nebulas are awarded by writers, they often go to more "literary" works.

    20. Re:It's a TV Show by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm, you've given me an idea. Every time a politician does something that irritates you, post them a peanut. At the end of their term, they are put into a trebuchet, with the peanuts as the counterweight. Any that survive are permitted to stand for re-election. Any that don't are no longer part of the problem.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    21. Re:It's a TV Show by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      And if you want a really good book, try some of the ones that have won both. I've read most of the ones from before 1990 on recommendations from friends, and they're all superb. I'm currently enjoying Startide Rising, and slightly irritated that I only just found the Uplift saga.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    22. Re:It's a TV Show by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      I can see where you're coming from, but please remember that these guys are spending like $2 EACH, not the many Ks you quote. So, you should compare their actions to something else that costs a negligible amount of money. Like, eating those nuts rather than shipping them somewhere else :D

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    23. Re:It's a TV Show by GTMoogle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a surprisingly creative solution. The problem being, of course, that all the politicians will send each other tons of peanuts, and all knowing their impending doom, will unanimously change the law to avoid it.

    24. Re:It's a TV Show by Hawksdomain · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Get a grip people, we all have lives outside of this TV show. This is so much more than just about a show. I'm terribly sorry that you did not stick around to see how the show progressed. Yes, Hawkins girlfriend was a very stupid plot, but thankfully she is now dead.

      A great majority of the contributors to this campaign are business owners/executives. We are mostly comprised of very intelligent people, such as yourselves, which was why I was originally thrilled to learn we had made our mark here.... until I started reading all of this bashing.

      Our movement is to speak out against 'the man' for all of this ridiculous programming. Most especially - REALITY TV. How lame can it get? Jericho is being replaced by a show about 40 CHILDREN, UNSUPERVISED, in New Mexico rebuilding a ghost town. My first thought is that these parents should be shot for allowing their children to take part in such a stupid idea. Jericho was only one of two shows that I watched on network TV. Yes, the other is Lost, come on, did you catch that season finale this week??

      The next 'serialized' show that CBS will be bringing out mid season is called 'Swingtown'. Not swingsets or swingshifts, mind you, but a show about swingers in the 1970s. OK, the 1970s was known as the sexual revolution but I have a lot of arguments about this craziness. First, the demographics CBS is trying to reach by canceling Jericho - most weren't even born in the '70s yet! I was born in the early 70s and there is no way I could've been involved in any type of sexual revolution at the time! Who cares what a bunch of disco loving freaks were doing? Second, and even more importantly.... What about the FAMILIES who were watching Jericho. Do you really think that parents are going to want to sit there with their children to watch such an inappropriate show? My gawd! I'm in my mid 30s and wouldn't want to watch such a show with my parents!!

      Quality TV is dead. Jericho was original, had a good plot and action. Was not sexually explicit, no excessive language, and aside from the obvious, did not have any graphic violence. It was a wonderful family show. These TV execs have got to get a freaking clue. That is what this movement is about.

      Yes, I love this show. It was awesome. I could care less about who Jake ends up with... blonde or brunette... And, I am a woman. I want to know who wins the war. I want to know how the town will survive the next year - six months - whatever. I want to know WHO exactly dropped the bomb. I want to know if Jericho and others will be able to defeat this new government with the messed up flag and the man who seems to be the one behind the dropping of the bomb. I want to know who is on the train. I want to know how Hawkins is going to deal with them in a tank with no ammo. Put the blonde and brunette together, that will grab most of you driveling men. Just send Jake back out there to fight and save his town!

      This is why we are sending nuts to CBS. And, as was pointed out above, the nuts are going to various charities. To the troops overseas, to the Bronx Zoo, to the homeless shelters. This has been at the request of the fans sending the nuts, as well as the company that is backing the campaign so fervently, www.nutsonline.com

      OK, my last point, I promise. Recently we saw the end ratings for the season of the network shows. I don't recall the link, but it was on the Hollywood Reporter website. CBS renewed the stupid sitcom 'How I Met Your Mother' and it performed MUCH WORSE than Jericho. Don't tell me that this is business. This is plain-ass stupid!

      Now if a simple girl from Kansas can fight for America's values and try to squash this nightmare of American Idol, why can't you?

    25. Re:It's a TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not the kind of guy that goes around pointing out how all these vanity things we do are bad because that money could be better used elsewhere. Hey, if it makes you feel good, then whatever. But still, there's got to be a limit... a point where you say, "you know, this is kind of a ridiculous; there are more important things to worry about."

      So, contrary to your self-perception, you ARE the kind of guy that goes around pointing out how these vanity things we do are bad.

      Liar.

    26. Re:It's a TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10) Sit around posting on /. judging others

    27. Re:It's a TV Show by bug1 · · Score: 1

      10. Ignoring people like yourself who waste their life telling people to live like them.

    28. Re:It's a TV Show by mark_0945 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This fight to Save Jericho is about larger issues. Too long Nielsen's flawed ratings system has controlled what is aired in North America and it's about time this ends. Jericho is quality television....... you can say what you will about television but it effects everyone's life in North America even if they don't watch it. As for that American Idol crap it's not only effecting television negatively it's also effecting music negatively.... Yeah fighting to save Jericho has bigger impact than just getting the show back on the air.

    29. Re:It's a TV Show by bug1 · · Score: 1

      It's not as if these people are getting anything tangible for their investment

      You seem to be totally missing the point,

      If fans wanted to get something tangible for their money they would send the nuts to themselves.

      They are sending the nuts to CBS to make a point, CBS have said they intend to donate the nuts to some charity.

      The donations are not being wasted, if all the money spend on publicity was recycled to charities such as is happening with Jericho nuts then the world would be a better place.

    30. Re:It's a TV Show by mark_0945 · · Score: 1

      "It's a TV show. Get over it. They cancelled Firefly, now Jericho is gone. As an alternative, these people should consider: 1) Going to the gym 2) Taking a loved one out to dinner 3) Taking up art 4) Relaxing with friends over the internet 5) Fixing some of those pesky things around the house 6) Getting a dog for companionship instead of a television 7) Volunteering for experiments on drugs to treat obsessive compulsive disorder 8) Going for a walk in the woods and experiencing nature 9) Getting a tan There are so many other things to do in life that worry about a man soap opera. M" yeah like you are doing those things yourself........ nope you are not you are sitting at the computer bashing other people's efforts to save something that they like... pot calling the kettle black if you ask me.... yeah I watch Jericho... and go to the forums when I have the time... but mostly I am out doing other things.. can you say the same... Saving Jericho is more than just about saving a television show.. it's about taking back the airwaves from the pet rock equivilent of entertainment ie dancing with the stars and american idol.

    31. Re:It's a TV Show by yellobelli · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I am sure you do not spend money on non-necessity items like cell phones, coffee from restaurants, pre-packaged foods, clothes from retail stores, etc. Get off your high horse, please. You might get a nose bleed. I would be just like these people if they took House off the air. That's the only show I watch. If the network took away my one and only show, I would be pisssed.

    32. Re:It's a TV Show by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you really want these people trying to fix government?

      No - I think vetinarians should do it so it would be less cruel - although some skilled farm workers with those special pliers or rubber rings would be just as good.

    33. Re:It's a TV Show by sherylb33 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that maybe you missed the point on this. We are parents of five children ages 10 to 17. We monitor very closely what is viewed on the TV in our home. Jericho is the only prime time program that we have watched this year. As a mother, I was impressed that the writers were able to write story lines that appealed to every member of our family and I was even more impressed with the fact that they were able to write Jericho without putting in language and content that would have made me cringe and turn off the TV. Our children are involved in many activities such as sports programs, music lessons, dance lessons (for the girl's)and they are all on the honor roll at school. We also go out to dinner occasionaly and they all attend youth group meetings and activities at our church. I am proud to say that my family is one of the many who are joining this campaign to save Jericho. We need to let the entertainment industry know that we want quality programming. We have limited amounts of time for TV in our schedules.....and during that time we want interesting and entertaining programs to enjoy.

    34. Re:It's a TV Show by vorpal22 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The viewers made an investment of their time and effort (i.e. arranging their schedule to watch their show). While the networks are under no obligation to do so, if they feel compelled to cancel a show, it would be respectful to their viewers to produce one more episode to wrap things up as best as possible and bring completion to the series as opposed to leaving it hanging and unresolved.

    35. Re:It's a TV Show by timmyandrosi · · Score: 1

      Well said . Its about bigger issues. I want Jericho back but i also want some rational decisions from the networks. Our generation does not comsume TV the same same, We dual task,. We DVR, Show cancellations are based on 5000 people watching ( Neilsen ).. ?? How can 5000 people decide what you and I shoudl watch? Fight the fight and Save Jericho

    36. Re:It's a TV Show by timmyandrosi · · Score: 1

      ug... you dont get it. Its thousands of people giving 5 and 10 dollars is not offensive. Its impressive. Its not wasted money if the person giving in it believes in it. I am certain you waste 5 dollars in a year. At least this money is going to a cause and not starbucks.

    37. Re:It's a TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >says you, a guy on sladshot.
      Say you, a guy that can't spell Slashdot.

    38. Re:It's a TV Show by DariaApple · · Score: 1

      Oh, sweetheart. I teach fitness - my minimum exercise week is at least 20 hours. I cook dinner - much more love in that. I do art with my kids. I'm on a loop with my friends. Everything's fixed except that pesky AC. Wanna loan me $5K? I'm allergic to dogs - and cats. Besides, I have kids who. They're in bed before Jericho. I give blood. Does that count? Mosquitos adore me. Tanning causes cancer, dummy. Now, after I have filled my day with nearly everything you've mentioned, I like to come home, kick my feet up, and relax in front of the tele. Be a bump on a log, as it were. And you're going to suggest that at 8 pm, I go out and TAN? Maybe you should move away from the computer...

    39. Re:It's a TV Show by timeOday · · Score: 1

      It's a TV show. Get over it. They cancelled Firefly, now Jericho is gone. As an alternative, these people should consider: 1) Going to the gym 2) Taking a loved one out to dinner 3) Taking up art
      Dude, who's worse - them, or you and I blogging on slashdot about them on Saturday morning?
    40. Re:It's a TV Show by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "As an alternative, these people should consider"

      Why are you wasting your time posting on here instead of doing any of the things you have listed, hypocrite?

    41. Re:It's a TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, whilst tanning, read a fucking book. On skin cancer. That's gross. I thought laying on that glass surface with the bulbs under it was bad enough.....
    42. Re:It's a TV Show by racegirlnct · · Score: 1

      Don't consider myself superhuman, just average, and I regularly go to the gym, out to dinner, visit my favorite museum, spend time catching up on the news online, mow my lawn, have two dogs and three cats, volunteer with the red cross, live in the woods and spend weekends at the beach....AND I STILL HAD TIME TO WATCH JERICHO!!!!! Geez, why do people get so bent out of shape because people get passionate about the entertainment they choose in their lives. I've seen die hard sports fans paint their bodies and act like "Nuts" in public. So what is so demented about Jericho fans showing their passion by sending "Nuts" to CBS? Sure Jericho had the human elements. Doesn't life?? I think part of the point of the story is that even in times of such an horrific event, life goes on. It changes the way we live, the way we feel but it's still life! I for one liked the way they included the everyday human elements into the story line along with all the new challenges the people of Jericho had to face.

    43. Re:It's a TV Show by prelelat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hate reality tv more than most people. I never watched survivor I never got into american idol or any other crappy show like that. I could never figure out why when you wanted to relax you would want to watch a show where normal people were freaking out. I would prefer to watch mcgiver do something totaly crazy with a paper clip.

      But I got to thinking a month or two back about American Idol in particular and how it was crappy. Then it came to me, I don't think its that bad of a concept. How is it worse than having a Britney Spears? I started to compare the two, instead of having someone who can't hold a note sing pop music you now have a nation wide contest to see who can and make them into a pop star. Now I'm not a pop music fan, it's not my thing. But I would much rather have someone whos gone through a national talent search singing then some girl with big boobs whos gone through 100 hours of mixing at a studio to sound good.

      So while I do agree that its shitty television, I would not say its hurting the music industry as much as mixing a crappy singer to sound good. Also you at least get to vote to say this person sucks. Some of them do have talent they just don't sing like AC/DC.

    44. Re:It's a TV Show by arachnoprobe · · Score: 1

      On Global Warming.

    45. Re:It's a TV Show by farker+haiku · · Score: 1

      you can say what you will about television but it effects everyone's life in North America even if they don't watch it.

      Huh? How? I don't watch TV and it doesn't affect my life at all. Wow that was easy than I thought it would be to argue against.

      --
      Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    46. Re:It's a TV Show by idonthack · · Score: 1

      Okay, you liked the show. I liked it too, in fact it was one of the few shows I did, but seriously, it's just a TV show. They get cancelled sometimes. The world will not end. In fact it's probably better this way, because you can do something else with your family instead of sitting around and staring at a screen.

      This protest shows that people in this country care more about entertainment than they do about the rest of the world, or even their own country. Imagine the attention garnered by doing this same stunt about something that mattered; it would motivate others to get involved.

      But all this effort is being wasted on asking a corporation to keep telling a fictional story that doesn't matter anyways. You could have asked them to start reporting real news, or quit suppressing alternative presidential candidates, or something that would have done some good. You could even protest the immorality and stupidity of the 'reality TV' shows becoming more prevalent every season. If you're devoting this kind of action to a cancelled weekly drama, you are either uninformed of the real issues or have too much time on your hands.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    47. Re:It's a TV Show by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I'd never even heard of "Jericho" until now so I could care less but "Jericho is being replaced by a show about 40 CHILDREN, UNSUPERVISED, in New Mexico rebuilding a ghost town.", now THAT is something I need to see! It's about time they made a reality TV version of Lord of the Flies. I'm taking bets on which episode they first start resorting to cannibalism.

      Right now a homeless shelter and an army unit are saying the same thing, "What the hell are we going to do with a ton of peanuts?"

      I kid! I kid!

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    48. Re:It's a TV Show by techsoldaten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With all due respect, it's because it's entertainment. I mean, I am involved in a lot of political causes and fully realize that the drama of them is hardly any different from getting caught up in a TV show. That said, there's the potential for what I am doing to make a difference in someone's life in some small way. If I was spending the same time watching TV, I know the greatest potential there is for my butt to get fatter. On a basic level, that's what bothers people about this.

      At a higher level, protesting the actions of a television network is really bothersome when compared to the actions of Americans in regards to actual real world events. When the government suspended habeus corpus for people accused of terrorism, where were the nuts? Who was sending stuff like this to Congress to tell them we did not appreciate what they were doing? When the DMCA passed, who was sending nuts to their politicians?

      It's just surprising to see what is essentially online politicial activism directed towards a piece of entertainment. Bless you for standing up for something you believe in, now let's go get mobilized to get our boys home from Iraq, the price of gasoline down, living wages for all Americans, universal health care or whatever it is you care about besides TV.

      M

    49. Re:It's a TV Show by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

      I don't recall the link, but it was on the Hollywood Reporter website. CBS renewed the stupid sitcom 'How I Met Your Mother' and it performed MUCH WORSE than Jericho. Don't tell me that this is business. This is plain-ass stupid!

      To be fair, though I'm very much in support of Jericho continuing, and I don't know this 'How I Met Your Mother' show at all, but if the number of people watching it keeps the advertisers covering it production costs, then that'll be in the black, figuratively, and accountants like that sort of thing.

      Jericho, even by their Nielsen based estimates may well have had many more viewers but I'm guessing the production costs were probably a LOT higher (HIMYM is a sitcom after all, no costly nuclear holocaust cgi needed, or tanks, weapons, squibs etc), so on that point it is good business.

      The flaw would be in the Nielsen ratings. As long as everyones thoughts on their inaccuracy isn't based on peoples knowledge of internet viewing, as people torrenting episodes are currently the bane of the advertisers.

    50. Re:It's a TV Show by brighette · · Score: 1

      Why does support to a show have to preclude everything else? I enjoyed Jericho - was it my favorite show on TV? No. Did I watch it every week? Yes, though on my own time frame. Because I do go to the gym (3-4 times a week), take my loved ones out to dinner, relax with my friends over the internet, spend time playing with my dog, clean up around the house/fix dinner/do laundry, took time to rent a cabin for a week so I could get out and enjoy nature...I seemed to hit a lot of things on your list.

      That's why I've contributed to the NUTS for Jericho campaign and sent an email to my local affiliate. Because I did enjoy the show and the current ratings system is antiquated; it needs to be updated to reflect the fact that modern conveniences allow me to have programming fit MY schedule. I rarely watch TV live, preferring online viewing or the DVR. That's what I love about this campaign, that it's sticking it to a network that has for the last year encouraged their viewers to be more technically savvy, then turned around and made a decision based on live ratings. This after a 3 month hiatus, little promotion and being up against American Idol - dropping 3 million viewers would be expected probably just from that last point alone. But I bet a lot of those viewers were catching up on the show in some other way.

      I have also taken time out of my schedule to contribute to charities and associations that I feel are important. I have written to my senator to pass along my views. Just because we support Jericho does not mean that is all we do.

      I wish people had done more to save Firefly - it's one of my all time favorite shows and it was screwed royally by FOX. Yes, TV shows come and go. If Jericho doesn't come back, my life will continue without a blip. But I still love this campaign and applaud all of its supporters!

    51. Re:It's a TV Show by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I used to watch a great deal more television than I do now. Still watch some shows, and I have a DVR. I set it to record a handful of shows, and it gets more stuff than I can even watch, so I end up deleting a lot of shows unwatched.

      Well, except for this week when I got stuck at home with some sort of horrible allergy thing, but I digress.

    52. Re:It's a TV Show by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      Who are you to dictate how people should spend their time or how they should prioritize the things in their lives?

    53. Re:It's a TV Show by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      A great majority of the contributors to this campaign are business owners/executives. We are mostly comprised of very intelligent people, such as yourselves, which was why I was originally thrilled to learn we had made our mark here.... until I started reading all of this bashing.

      Rough translation: We, the fans of the show, convinced ourselves we were better than the average Joe Sixpack. Our delusions were sadly shattered on encountering the real world.
       

      Quality TV is dead. Jericho was original,

        Jericho was a direct ripoff of Alas, Babylon and dozens of other (much, much, worse than the classic Babylon) post apocalyptic books, movies, and TV shows. It wasn't original in plotline or characterization or any other useful metric.
       
      Which is why I watched two espisodes and gave up. Reading Wikipedia's summary, I'm glad I did - as it is glaringly apparent the show went rapidly downhill. Not satisfied with badly mangling the post apocolypse genre, it went on to add soap opera themes, plagiarise 24 and then the X-Files.
    54. Re:It's a TV Show by sohare · · Score: 1

      Rabid TV watchers remind me a lot of heroin addicts.

    55. Re:It's a TV Show by Literaphile · · Score: 1

      10) Waste time posting comments on a computer bulletin board?

    56. Re:It's a TV Show by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Which I why I try not to get interested in a TV program till well into the 3rd or 5th season. That way the show will have a proven track record of good shit worth watching. SG-1 was like that. I didn't get interested until 4th season. I should have jumped ship in the middle of the 6th season, but for some reason I've decided to ride that bitch right into the wall.

      What was a I yammering about? Oh yeah, if I pick up a show then I can go back and netflix the first seasons or just watch them in reruns. Usually by the time I get caught up the show is out of my system and I no longer give a shit. CSI and The Shield was like that. I caught CSI in the middle, got interested in it. CBS ran a rerun of the show like every 5 minutes so I was caught up real damn quick.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    57. Re:It's a TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Also, whilst tanning, read a fucking book. On skin cancer.

      Tanning increases your risk of skin cancer, but it may be a good idea anyway. I'll let an expert speak:

      "Dr. Michael Holick, a professor of medicine, physiology and biophysics at Boston University School of Medicine, believes shunning sunlight is a fool's bargain: Although shade and sunscreen protect against common skin cancers, avoiding sun may increase the risk of much more serious diseases -- including cancers of the breast, colon and prostate -- by cutting off a natural way to make vitamin D. An SPF 8 sunscreen will reduce absorption of ultraviolet B rays by about 95%, and vitamin D production will drop by the same amount, he says."

      - LA Times Article

      (The fact that the article in question was reposted on a PR company's website suggests it the tanning industry paid for the PR. That doesn't make the science any less real, though.)

      Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going for a run. Outside. In the sunlight, oh no!

    58. Re:It's a TV Show by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      10) Post sanctimonious replies to /. Thanks so much for illuminating my sad life. I certainly couldn't have come up with a list of things to do besides watch TV on my own.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    59. Re:It's a TV Show by eleqtriq · · Score: 1

      And you know what I want to do after I'm done with that kind of stuff for the day?

      Relax and watch a good TV show. Say..like..Jericho.

    60. Re:It's a TV Show by VanessaE · · Score: 1
      Neilsen does not control what appears on your TV. I know this for a fact because I used to work there, and my husband still doed. All Neilsen does is gather information about what shows people watch and sell that information to the various media companies. It's still 100% CBS' call what to do with their airtime. Getting back on the real subject... I'm upset that Jericho has been cancelled (supposedly), just as I'll be doubly upset the day House goes off the air (which hopefully will be a long way off). Between those two, CSI, and occasionally Idol, that's all that I find worth watching on TV. Well, and reruns of Star Trek (TOS) on one of the local stations.


      Are there "better" things to do with my time? Maybe, but since my voice doesn't really matter in the big picture (i.e. against war, human rights, etc), and many of the "better" things are just plain outside of my physical capabilities, I'd rather put my efforts into something where I might actually stand a chance of changing the outcome.

    61. Re:It's a TV Show by chasisaac · · Score: 1

      Not only is the idea wonderful and . . . well having me ready to send peanuts . . . the politicians will send them and we will get a full new set of wHORes every two years. In my book that would be not only good but a great thing.

      --
      -- A computer without Windoze is like a choclate cake without mustard
    62. Re:It's a TV Show by dkf · · Score: 1

      Do you really want these people trying to fix government?

      As opposed to the current incumbents? It's gotta be worth a try...
      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    63. Re:It's a TV Show by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! I'm not sure why anyone though this show was original. If you think it is, you don't read very much, or you don't watch ANY good TV/film. Not that it had to be original to good, but this show wasn't that either - terrible writing, hackneyed plotlines, wasted potential... it's all in there.

    64. Re:It's a TV Show by Hawksdomain · · Score: 1

      Who are you to say that I have not protested against our government? As a matter of fact, I have. It has gotten to the point that politics is something I simply do not discuss with other family members (Mom, sister, etc) because they do not see things the same way I do. I am very passionate about how messed up this country is and how wrong BOTH wars in Iraq are/were. Ummm, isn't it my right in this country to protest what I want to protest and that is why I have not been jailed yet? There will not be any success in this country until 'Dubya' is gone. The country will suffer until he is out of office. It is as simple as that. I have protested enough to know that there is not a strong enough movement against the current state of our government, so why not start reaching to people where they live.... the television. Several people in this movement volunteer at various charities. One off the top of my head has volunteered at local humane societies for over 20 years now. One writes checks monthly to various charities including Unicef that amount much more than the small contribution made to this cause. We are passionate people. Unfortunately the masses, yourself included, do not see the other things we are involved in and automatically want to jump to the conclusion that we are a bunch of 'couch potatoes', which couldn't be further from the truth. Another unfortunate fact is that America is obsessed with TV. Yes, my fight does nothing to discourage this, however, should we be able to succeed in being heard on this trivial issue (I use trivial only in comparison to the homeless, hungry, battered women and children and other such issues), this could potentially be the beginning of big business/government/big brother/the man finally taking protesters seriously, by realizing that we are now in a new digital world that allows us, the 'common man' to be able to reach the masses just as easily as they can. To be able to get our word out. To be able to recruit the many more masses needed in order to make a change in how this government operates. The issues I have with the operation of this government go far beyond 'Dubya' and his administration, and this is not the topic of conversation. HOWEVER, I strongly believe that a win here will lead to much bigger things, and not just in the entertainment industry. Perhaps you are the one uninformed.

    65. Re:It's a TV Show by Hawksdomain · · Score: 1

      Never said I was better than ANYONE. Although you seem to be quite the jerk, I will even say that I am not better than you. Just stated some facts. Like it or not, there are business owners and other executives, as well as stay at home mothers, a woman suffering from leukemia who has recently undergone a stem cell procedure that has brutalized her immune system leaving her confined to her home, and for the most part to her bed. I am a business manager for a small engineering company. I make less than $40K per year, ie, I don't make squat. My predecessors did not have a college education, showing that only a high school education would be required for my job. Hey, it might work well for you.... But, I digress. NEVER did I mean to imply in any way shape or form that I, or ANYONE fighting this fight is any better than any other human on the face of this earth.

      Yes, I have seen some references to this Alas Babylon, whatever that may have been. I have no interest in clicking the lovely link you made, because I could care less. I am EXTREMELY interested in seeing your proof on the plagiarism of 24 and, because I've actually seen it, the X Files.

      In fact, I also urge you to read the response I wrote just before this one. THIS IS FAR MORE THAN A FIGHT OVER A TV SHOW.

    66. Re:It's a TV Show by Hawksdomain · · Score: 1

      Yeah and let us just think that I alone spent that $20K. Oh that makes a great deal of sense. I spent a whopping $5 on this cause. And I got satisfaction out of that.... satisfaction that will last me throughout my life knowing that I stood up and fought for something that I feel strongly about.

      Now, those of you silly enough to tan.... I don't know and don't care, but I would imagine that you spend much more than $5 and how long does your satisfaction last???

    67. Re:It's a TV Show by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      14. Find Cold Fission
      15. Cure Cancer
      16. Play a MMORPG


      I'll go with #16 Chuck...
      _____

      "A million morons still equals a million morons!"

    68. Re:It's a TV Show by CompuFinance · · Score: 1

      And an enjoyable one at that. Thank you for your recommendations, but let me tell you about my life... I am a 55 y.o. professional consultant that earns a nice 3-figure-per-HOUR income. I am married for almost 35 years, have two grown daughters who are professionals in their "white-collar" careers and have a dog and two cats. We go out to dinner regularly and will be taking another Alaskan cruise in just a few weeks. I've also produced two international television programs about the U.S. fire/rescue service, been a member of NATPE (National Association of Television Producers & Executives)and was asked to consult on programming segments for the old "Rosie Show," and "The Maury Povich Show," regarding the fire/rescue service. I'll soon be serving as a producer for a new show on Court TV and have a treatment for a new dramatic series under consideration by several producers and production companies. I believe the above will meet your criteria for having a full and creative life. That being said, there are a number of television shows that I enjoy watching when I have the time, either as broadcast or recorded on my DVR. "Jericho" is one of them. Was it always the most well-written show? No, it wasn't. Was the it the absolute "nirvana" of television programming? Again, no it wasnt'. But was it a generally well-written, compelling drama that usually created eager viewer interest and involved them in an ongoing drama? Yes, it did. Television is is tough and dirty business. People will stab you in the back as soon as shake hands with you. With the massive proliferation of cheap, trivial, reality programming, the networks save production costs, but also get paid less by the sponsors, unless and until those shows can build up a specific and targeted audience. Even the sponsors realize that the current Nielsen ratings system is antiquated and unreliable. Initially they failed to factor in the impact of VCR view and more recently, have failed to factor in DVR viewing. Some even say that their coverage of shows viewed via satellite services might be askew. Be that as it may, "Jericho" was given its initial run, then shelved for nearly 3 months. As the producers and networks of several other shows, including "Lost" have recently found out, shelving the show to avoid repeats, to save the balance of the new shows for ratings periods, has not worked. Viewers have clearly expressed that they would prefer to view repeats of a brand new show to catch-up on what might have been missed, than to lose the show entirely for the "shelf" period. "Jericho" suffered that indignity, as well as bring plopped opposite "American Idol," upon its return. The Nielsens' tracking from February on indicate what happened to ALL programming when "AI" came back, not just "Jericho." Thus, CBS saying that the drop in audience from 11 million to 9 million is not a valid proffer, since if all the the show lost was approximately 2 million viewsers, it would spell the death of the show. That decision was probably made during the "break" time for other reasons entirely. Nevertheless, the show was fun, dramatic and entertaining, as I am sure there are several shows that you enjoy when finally arriving home from your tanning booth. If you do not enjoy a show, you are perfectly entitled to criticize the show, the writers, crew, etc. But only an unintelligent, ill-mannered, buffoon would criticize a fan who enjoys a show. Please try not to generalize. FG

    69. Re:It's a TV Show by Cappadonna · · Score: 1

      If I may add: 10)Get involved in your local government (school board, zoning meetings) 11) Get involved in your church, mosque or synagogue if you're religious. 12) Read a book 13) Go out on a Saturday night.

    70. Re:It's a TV Show by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      NEVER did I mean to imply in any way shape or form that I, or ANYONE fighting this fight is any better than any other human on the face of this earth.

      Right. That's exactly why you keep emphasizing your incomes, educations, and accomplishments - to avoid it entering anyones mind that you are implying you are better than anyone else. (Not to mention your discussion of charities and political activism.)
       
       

      Yes, I have seen some references to this Alas Babylon, whatever that may have been. I have no interest in clicking the lovely link you made, because I could care less.

       
      That's sad really. It's tells me more about you than anything else you wrote - and what it says isn't pretty. It says you are not only ignorant and deluded, you have no desire to change that state. All you want is your petty entertainment over expanding your horizons.
       
       

      I am EXTREMELY interested in seeing your proof on the plagiarism of 24 and, because I've actually seen it, the X Files.

      Mysterious shadow goverments? Mysterious goverment plots? Mysterious characters with mysterious backgrounds? If you don't see the paralells, you merely further prove my conclusion as to your willfull ignorance.
       
       

      In fact, I also urge you to read the response I wrote just before this one. THIS IS FAR MORE THAN A FIGHT OVER A TV SHOW.

      You mean this lovely piece of garbage? Where you not only go on again about how much better you are, but where you delude yourself that somehow a fight over a TV show is a fight for greater things? ROTFLMAO.
    71. Re:It's a TV Show by mark_0945 · · Score: 1

      If you don't realize how what people watch on television effects even those who don't watch then you are really worth arguing with. Unless you are a hermit on an island somewhere television has effected your life in one way or another...... I seriously doubt that you have never watched television in your life. Get off your high horse cos it's just a dime store poney ride..... yeah that's right FAKE!

    72. Re:It's a TV Show by mark_0945 · · Score: 1

      actually this just might have a better chance of getting renewed than other issues I am fighting for or against right now... IE ban on Nicotine Based Pesticides which are the most likely cause of the deaths of honey bees lately... stopping coal bed methane wells in my area. Spreading the message of Permaculture and Edible Landscaping to reduce Environmental Damage... So I got hooked on one Television show as a break from my other activities which are most likely alot more than most people on this site. Two or Three days a week I have time to help with this fight due to the nature of my night job... The rest of the week my life in full and doing all more than many others here... :) As for your Nielsen comments they aren't worth a response...

    73. Re:It's a TV Show by Hawksdomain · · Score: 1

      Gee, I see that I will never change your mind. I see that you think I am petty and worthless. Fine. I guess now you want me to go jump off a bridge or something. WTF. Whatever. I concede to you all mighty Derek. Now tell me, what can I do as an individual, other than voting, other than contacting my local government officials that are in Washington DC.... Oh no, better idea, what are you doing to fix this mess that the nation is in?

    74. Re:It's a TV Show by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      Great, thanks for your life story.

      I am a 33 year old political consultant who owns a successful technology firm and also enjoys a healthy income. I cook for myself and rarely eat out unless it is for a reason. I run 3 miles a day, engage in my community where there are serious needs (tutoring inner city youth, volunteering at food banks and shelters, teaching English as a second language) and have a variety of academic pursuits. I am active politically and regularly provide detailed technical expertise to lawmakers and lobbists (not that they ever listen to my opinions, but I do help them get their facts straight). My young daughter excels at everything from sports to academics, and, outside of the broadcast schedule of Red Sox games (which I watch on my laptop), I would not know when anything is going to be on TV.

      No one is critizing anyone for enjoying a show as is tacitly implied in your response. To each their own, everyone is free to spend time how they choose. Social activism around a piece of entertainment is the subject here, and there are people who feel it is decadent and self-indulgent to spend thousands of dollars trying to sway the opinions of managers at a publicly held corporation over something as meaningless as a fictional broadcast series. Let's face it, if you want to change the world, other people are going to have their opinions and you are going to have to put up with that. There is nothing rude or ill mannered about people expressing their opinions, you live in a society where everyone has the right to say what they think.

      On the other hand, as a professional consultant, I would seriously question the competence of anyone looking for good manners on Slashdot. No one cares what you do for a living, and the fact you are so defensive about your TV schedule is probably proof of my original point. Your old media credentials are meaningless and people like you are going to fade away as advertisers start to wise up to the fact they get better ROI off cable. I may start a campaign to persuade CBS that to keep that crap show off the air because of all the fringe elements it attracts, and I bet I could get more people involved and create more visibility for a fraction of what you people have spent on your nuts.

      M

    75. Re:It's a TV Show by Ricochet67 · · Score: 1

      Why would you think we have no lives, just because we are interested in a quality show? 1) already do that 2) do that every week 3) I have no talent for art, but I read 3 books a week and play the piano, will that count toward "art" in your mind? 4) I spend all day on the computer at work - I'd rather relax with my friends in real life 5) do that on weekends, poured concrete last week for my hurricane shutter extended anchors 6) we have a dog, a cat and an iguana and we spend a lot of time at the park with the dog, the cat's lap time was during Jericho! The iguana just kind of vegges out eating flowers. 7) I don't have OCD and neither does my son - I do a thorough job and am detail oriented at work, as he is, but we are not OCD by any stretch of the imagination. 8) having been in Scouts for 20 years, I've done plenty of hiking, camping and nature walks, including taking 20 other kids along one weekend a month to show them that there is something out there besides concrete - that's 240 campouts and about 100 hikes, not to mention 16 weeks of summer camp - some out of state where there are real mountains, some canoeing along 70 miles of rivers in north Florida. 9) I can't do that - I live in South Florida and burned to a crisp every summer of my childhood - I have to do all my hiking and camping in jeans and long sleeved cotton shirts and a hat to avoid skin cancer - why would I be stupid enough to try to get a tan? 10) fix the government? Hey, we're trying - just got the governor to toss out those stupid e-voting machines so that Florida can get back to having its votes count! And yes, I used to vote on the punch cards, but I always flipped it over and made sure none of the chads were hanging, dented or otherwise not completely punched out, before I gave it to the official. 11) charitable organizations - I actively work with 2 (1 animal related, 1 human related) and donate my disposable income to about a dozen all through the year - would you like a list? 12) do that on a regular basis - protest the war in Iraq (just like I used to protest the Vietnam war), protest animal cruelty, protest abusive people who hurt children... 13) profit? that's nobody's business but mine - I work for my living and I put my son through college and veterinary school with only a moderate amount of student loans on his part, I spend my disposable income on taking care of my family, my friends, my pets, my favorite charities... if I choose to send $5 or $10 or $20 worth of peanuts (as a Protest to Jericho's cancellation) to CBS, knowing they will donate them somewhere else, that's my business. I give 10 times that to charities every year - my "peanut money" will come out of my pocket money, which is mine to do what I wish with - so this week, maybe we'll go out to dinner for BBQ or Italian, instead of steaks - and there's our $20 in peanut money right there - not hurting anybody or changing the way we live and think. I'm sick and tired of the crappy programming on televsion - there were 2 shows on that were interesting enough to watch - and now I'm down to one - if they don't bring Jericho back, I'll just be reading more books. And the cat can get her lap time just as easily. Karen South Florida

    76. Re:It's a TV Show by Hawksdomain · · Score: 1

      OK, one last thought.... when did plagiarism = parallelism?

    77. Re:It's a TV Show by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      ***applause***

      *waves* from Colorado next door - I've spent more time burning up my Firefox & Laptop and bank account sending letters, postcards, nuts, and emails to everyone I can think of to help bring us the publicity to put the pressure on CBS.

      They stopped shipping back props from the set - that much I know. Carol Barbee is calling for more snail mail (hence the postcards... 1/2 the price of letters), they think we'll give up now that summer is here. :D

      I really really want to see this work - it's all so friggin' stupid - my idle-conspiracy-brain tells me that just like some other controversial shows with ratings that there are bigger forces at work here. But I'm a nut case! :D

      You know what sucks? I didn't miss an episode live on CBSHD. Not one. Not like it matters... And I think that's the point that we're trying to make.

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  6. Congrats to the NutsOnline guy by TodMinuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He found a way to make a buck out of a canceled show. My hats off to him.

    --
    I wonder if I use bold in my signature, people will notice my posts.
    1. Re:Congrats to the NutsOnline guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right, as seen on the Jericho forum:

      "i kno, let's send em some REAL nuts from like www.NutsOnline.com or sumfin lol
      -posted by Anonymous"
       
      :)

    2. Re:Congrats to the NutsOnline guy by kinabrew · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually, on the nutsonline page, he says

      Hello Jericho lovers!

      From a few orders, to a few more orders, to a few emails, to a lot more emails, we suddenly found ourselves in the middle of a campaign to support a show we had never even watched before
    3. Re:Congrats to the NutsOnline guy by elborrachogato · · Score: 0

      Incredible... I'm amazed every day at the gullibility of Americans.

  7. would poor people in Darfur eat peanuts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, I wonder...maybe that would be a better use than bringing back a freakin' network TV show. Our culture is soo narcissistic and self-centered. Don't mod this down...leave it alone at the most, but what I'm writing is unavoidably true.

    1. Re:would poor people in Darfur eat peanuts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all the nuts are going to charity but hey, don't bother climbing down off the cross long enough to figure out what's going on

    2. Re:would poor people in Darfur eat peanuts? by Arnos · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It doesn't have to be a cross.
      They could have stated it:
      So instead of getting mad at the Bush administration for an unpopular war, they send nuts to a TV show.
      Instead of getting mad at meat companies for (insert whatever) they send nuts for a TV show.
      Instead of getting mad at companies and governments about global warming, they send nuts o a TV show.

      It's called perspective. It WAS a TV show, and not really a good one at that.

      Of course if it was done for Firefly.....

  8. This got by the editors? by MonGuSE · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm sorry but the campaign to save the StarTrek Enterprise series for a 5th year was far larger. This quick search garnered a BBC News story showing over 3million US raised and if my memory serves correctly the fans were close to 20 million before being told that there was no way ?paramount? would run another series without an industry backer. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4312767.s tm

    1. Re:This got by the editors? by glwtta · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but the campaign to save the StarTrek Enterprise series for a 5th year was far larger.

      Yeah, I feel sorry about that too.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:This got by the editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, it's far cheaper to run a soap opera than a show set in space with moderately high production values. And nobody will ever campaign to save a reality TV show, because they're so cheap to produce that they usually outlive their welcome.

    3. Re:This got by the editors? by Car54 · · Score: 1

      This protest is about a week old. Give it time dudes. It will grow way more than it is now. Most fans still don't know about it.

    4. Re:This got by the editors? by mhochman · · Score: 1

      The Enterprize campaign went on longer (we've only been at this 1 week) and Enterprize was a different animal, first off, the $3,000,000 was corperate money, all the Jericho money is individual donations. 2nd off, the deal with Enterprize, was they raised that 3,000,000 to BUY THE RIGHTS to the show so that an independant studio could continue to produce new episodes. we are trying to get CBS/Paramount (same studio as Enterprize) to put the show back on the air, not produce it ourselves.

    5. Re:This got by the editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then perhaps you nuts oughtn't be claiming it's the largest fan effort ever.

    6. Re:This got by the editors? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      the fans were close to 20 million

      Oh, what a bunch of crap. If they had REALLY raised $20 million, they could have bought up about half of the advertising on the show. That would have been more than enough for Paramount to have brought it back for a season.

      I suspect that this "$20 million" was about as real as the millions of Firefly fans who were going to show up and give Serenity such a huge opening weekend. It probably consisted of two $10 million pledges from the "Jack Meov Corporation" and the "Harry Balz Society."

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  9. Man that's a shock by edwardpickman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Jericho had fans?

    1. Re:Man that's a shock by Soilworker · · Score: 1

      Jericho?

    2. Re:Man that's a shock by himthatwas · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that gets me too. I thought this was a show I would totally dig but after a few hours of it's daytime soap story lines and lack of interesting characters I was done with it.

      I do on the other hand like nuts and can appreciate any effort to get a completion to a story. The networks don't seem to understand that in addition to the many people who enjoy escaping life (and sanity) for a brief period once a week there are many people who make a connection with the worlds that are created and even if the end sucks there must be an ending. Give them fools a miniseries or something.

    3. Re:Man that's a shock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris Jericho was a popular wrestler until he left to tour with his Ozzy cover band and do VH1 specials.

    4. Re:Man that's a shock by ngworekara · · Score: 1

      CBS? wtf is CBS? Don't let them end it all with a fight over asbestos!!!

    5. Re:Man that's a shock by paintswithcolour · · Score: 1
      I confess to not having watched it, I resort to Wikipedia which states that it had ' lackluster ratings'...I'm not too sure what that means but it can't be good...

      Now what producer sat back and, with a knowing nod, thought 'Yeah, here comes our second season'. Low ratings are normally coupled with the threat of cancellation, so why would you use such an extreme cliffhanger?

      I'm also consistantly suprised that fans are shocked when a low-rating show is cancelled and make a huge fuss, now maybe if they cared enough to do it when there was a chance of getting more people to watch it (i.e when it was STILL on air).

    6. Re:Man that's a shock by Susan+in+Pittsburgh · · Score: 1

      Well the ratings weren't really THAT low. Plus, CBS kept mum about the cancellation until the day they announced it (May 16th), so I kept on watching in my normal manner which is outside of the Nielsen Box. This is the whole point, not how great or not the series is, but that we (being new media users, maybe you can relate?) aren't important to the networks we as consumers were completely ignored, now this campaign is entirely web based, and in a little over a week it raised over 28,000.00 (not including what was spent independently) without mainstream media assistance. The average donation is near 5.00 per person, so I think maybe the internet users actually do count.

    7. Re:Man that's a shock by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 1

      Jericho had fans? A fan.
  10. And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On one side, I think: The collaborative force that the Internet empowers is astounding... really, nothing like it in human history. Yet, I think of the world as a whole, with all our energy problems and even food supply problems in various parts of the world, I think: Human beings are fucked up! Nobody is giving up any money for alternative fuel research or public transportation. But, how many thousands of people will pay money to send food-stuffs to a producer of meaningless television entertainment? Do these people vote?

  11. Fortunately... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it was "Nuts!" and not "Crap!"

    1. Re:Fortunately... by basic0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would have been interested to see how this campaign would have played out if it had been "Fuck!"

    2. Re:Fortunately... by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably successfully.

    3. Re:Fortunately... by KansasorPat · · Score: 1

      Actually, the story told in Jericho comes from Gen. Anthony McAuliffe, and according to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_McAuliffe) he did say "shit" but it was cleaned up before sending it to the Germans.

  12. Might poor people in Darfur like to have this food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
    Seriously, I wonder. Maybe helping poor people by feeding them would be a better use of food than bringing back a freakin' network TV show. Our culture is sooo self-centered and narcisstic....sadly, some people involved in this will probably put this on their resumes as "volunteerism." They probably think they are reaaaally doing something great for the world...that they're on some meaningful crusade. and if you're going to mod me troll, think first...are you doing it because what i'm saying is inappropriate or untrue (its not), or because it annoys you to be reminded how shallow YOU might be.

    and i would feel very different about this if Jericho was some form of high art or something that uplifts the human spirit or culture...that is also a good use of resources...but it isn't. It's a shitty tv show that people are mindlessly addicted to, just most of the rest of shit on tv.

  13. Terrorist Attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is a thinly veiled biological attack made by terrorists.

    The producers of Jericho are allergic to peanuts!

  14. Witness the fall of the Republic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow. Thousands of Americans are dying in a foreign war that by all accounts we are not doing well in, and the opposition party is much less concerned with fixing the problem than making political hay. Our health care system is a shambles. A major American city is also still in shambles more than a year after an enormous natural disaster.

    After all that, what makes Americans stand up and say "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!" but a canceled television show.

    My fellow citizens, and all you others, I fear that this may be a grave sign of the failure of the American Experiment.

    1. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they could mix in a bit more socialism down in the land of the individual; maybe it would help. And I wonder now that more people live in cities than rural areas and all those people in the cities are going to need services (the real purpose of government to it's citizens) and I believe that societies that have migrated to socialism will be nice places to live within 20 years but the rest of the world will be riddled with little pockets of hell. But I know nothing apparently.

    2. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by bmac83 · · Score: 1

      I thought this article on World War II was interesting.

      To repeat one passage: "Nuisances such as blackouts and the rationing of food and clothes were trivial in comparison to the loss of life. Therefore, it was essential to think positively and to make the most of any diversions available to help them forget about the war, even if only for a short while."

      I think everyone needs an outlet. You or I might think it's kind of pointless, but perhaps it brightens someone's day to be simply part of something goofy and yet important to them.

    3. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing's wrong. Go back to bed.

    4. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To quote from memory: "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of wealth; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill

      Forgive me if I butchered it. ;)

    5. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      After all that, what makes Americans stand up and say "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!" but a canceled television show. Perhaps it is because 'the people' feel like they have more chance of changing the cancellation of a TV show than they do have of changing the course of direction that their government takes.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by aesdesdesdes · · Score: 1

      All that yet we're here posting about TV shows... I suppose it's a temporary escape.

    7. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by DrEasy · · Score: 1

      The Society of the Spectacle indeed...

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    8. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its all aout priorities, but on New Orleans, I sincerely think that reconstruction of that city is a vain task unless it will recieve Proper (Holland style) Category 5 Hurricane Protection. If they cant spend the money then theres no point in risking millions in reconstruction funds (and lives) if can all happen again next year!

    9. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by SoulDrift · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it is because 'the people' feel like they have more chance of changing the cancellation of a TV show than they do have of changing the course of direction that their government takes.

      It's funny you should mention that. 'The People' get to vote for their government, not their television.

    10. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except for... you know, voting with their dollars? or have you never heard that phrase applied to the market?
      and since when did i get to vote for my government? i get to vote for someones, certainly... but not mine!

    11. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      Dare I say it: $26k is peanuts compared to the money necessary to solve those problems.

      That said, I hope the nuts end up in food banks around NYC. But really, $26k would barely scratch the surface in solving Iraq, the health care system, or Katrina cleanup. Please...

    12. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      As an Individual you have roughly no control over what the government does, only when you have organized into a large group do you have power.

      Thinkers will never be able to organize themselves, because they don't all agree.

      So the people who just do stuff without thinking (politicians) have the power!

    13. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's funny you should mention that. 'The People' get to vote for their government, not their television. It's funny you should mention that. The powers that be present two nearly identical candidates on television and 'the people' get to vote for the one they like the most, really doesn't sound very empowering.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    14. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thousands of Americans are dying in a foreign war that by all accounts we are not doing well in

      You mean in media accounts or accounts from our brave soldiers? The two versions don't match and I'm willing to believe those that have actually been there rather than some jerk-off bloggers or talking head on the idiot box.

      Our health care system is a shambles

      When you actually work for a living instead of staying at home and finding new and creative ways to bitch about how you are not getting supported properly by the nanny state, you get this thing called a "Health Plan".

      A major American city is also still in shambles more than a year after an enormous natural disaster.

      Fifteen years ago, in a freshman Meteo class, we did a semester-long project on what would happen if New Orleans was hit by a Cat 3 hurricane. Our conclusion: Get EVERYONE out of the area because the city was going to be fucked. If some freshmen Meteo students could figure this out in 1992, why couldn't Nagin et al figure it out in 2005? Did FEMA drop the ball? Of course they did. But there shouldn't have been ANYONE in the city for FEMA to worry about; that is a local problem, not a national one. And frankly, why the fuck should I, as a US taxpayer, pay for someone else's house to be rebuilt, just so that it can get blown down again?

      Oh, and BTW, having visited there 3 weeks ago, I can tell you that certain parts of the New Orleans still show signs of damage, but much of it looks fine.

    15. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by gilroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's funny you should mention that. 'The People' get to vote for their government, not their television.

      It's funny you should mention that. The powers that be present two nearly identical candidates on television and 'the people' get to vote for the one they like the most, really doesn't sound very empowering.

      And that's why it's the end of the Republic -- because the citizenry accepts that. Despite overheated claims on both sides, most elections in America are in fact legal and fair. It isn't Soviet Russia where there are insurmountable legal barriers to running. But Americans don't care enough (or don't have enough faith or whatever) to demand real choices and real candidates -- or, for that matter, even to run for office on any level. Most people just want to feel their opinion is heard somewhere. Democracy is hard work and touch-tone dialing the latest American Idol null poll is easy.

      People say they don't vote because the system is unresponsive. But in fact, the system is unresponsive because they don't vote.

      There's also a horizon problem, in that most Americans want a payoff within a short time period -- an hour, tops, but preferably before the end of the next commercial break. Real change takes time, as real systems have social inertia. So we can't be bothered to focus on any process long enough to achieve real success.

      But in the end, the hell of it is, this truly is a representative democracy. We get exactly whom we deserve, and they're Just Like Us. More's the pity.
    16. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Republic? Isn't it a hereditry monarchy with the monarch beyond the condtitution or something now instead of a constitutional Republic? Throwing tea in the water won't help with this George III, but at least term limits stop him from being a permanant King.

    17. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      When you actually work for a living instead of staying at home and finding new and creative ways to bitch about how you are not getting supported properly by the nanny state, you get this thing called a "Health Plan".

      I love how that's such a simple solution in the mind of your average, healthy American.

      I have a chronic, incurable, and at times very debilitating illness called Crohn's Disease. I am typically fine about 85% of my life, but even with very strong medications with possibly disastrous long term side effects, for the other 15%, I am far too sick to work. Unfortunately, that 15% can manifest itself as serious flareups, which result in me being bedridden for several months at a time, and can require many expensive appointments and procedures (gastroenterologist checkups, CT scans, colonoscopies, surgeries). Even when I am well, I am essentially a ticking time bomb, never sure when the next bout of illness will explode upon me, but aware that it could happen at any time.

      This makes it difficult enough to find and secure long-term employment, as you can imagine, since employers generally aren't amenable to the idea that their employees might have to take, every couple of years or so, several months off for illness. Furthermore, if this occurs between jobs and I was living in the US, I would be absolutely screwed: unable to even seek a job, and not covered by any insurance. I cannot obtain insurance independently that will cover my Crohn's Disease expenses because no company in their right mind will willingly pay for the large number of expenses associated with this condition. (Remicade, one of the newer and much more effective medications, for example, costs between $20,000 and $100,000 per year.)

      You may not have to deal with things like this, but for a significant minority of the population, they're a real issue, and your cut and dry solution treats these people as if their illnesses are their fault while happily supporting people with self-imposed sicknesses like cigarette-induced lung cancer, obesity, etc.

      Thank god I live in Canada where I'm not punished for a condition over which I have virtually no control. When I'm ill, the last thing I need to worry about on top of everything else is insurance.

    18. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by Belacgod · · Score: 1

      This type of thought is incredibly stupid. "There are dire things going on, why don't we spend all our time and energy dealing with them?" Because we care disproportionately about what affects our lives most directly. Because we don't all agree with your political views enough to take our time to be activists for them. Because we think we can win this one but not the others. Because it takes 2 minutes to donate $2 to send peanuts to CBS for charity, and longer to volunteer in New Orleans. Because we donate to charity too.

    19. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      No, we don't. As another reply mentioned, we vote for who the TV says to vote for. And, when we don't, it's throwing our vote away. (I personally have a rule whenever I'm voting - never vote for someone or something that I disagree with at all. I have voted for no candidate for quite a few things in last year's election. (First time I voted, first time I could.))

    20. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      A major American city is also still in shambles more than a year after an enormous natural disaster.

       

      My fellow citizens, and all you others, I fear that this may be a grave sign of the failure of the American Experiment.

      No, the grave sign of such failure is that produces people profoundly ignorant enough to believe that such massive and widespread damage can be repaired in time for the third commercial break.
    21. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you also seem to have some kind of incurable disease where you post nude photos of yourself on the intarwebs
      seriously dude, wtf
      http://www.sebandthecity.com/pics/me/sebbyhairy2.j pg

    22. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by zenkonami · · Score: 1

      On the contrary. As experiments go, this one is highly successful, unless you had anticipated very specific results. It shows a few things, positive and negative.

      Positive: We can be a passionate and determined people, we love a good story, we value our "freedom" enough to exercise it on something even it is spending money and throwing our voices at a television show, we're creative, a cultural force and there are a few things we actually give a damn about.

      Negative: We're self-centered, driven by entertainment, worn-out, have short attention spans, often feel helpless, are overburdened by information (and uncertain how to organize it), have short attention spans, are undereducated regarding our systems of government, speech and business, and have exceedingly short spans of attention.

      Ambiguous: We're the kind of people who will debate the relevance of the issue on Slashdot. Are we going to make any more of a difference talking about it here? Is it worth expending that energy on a forum such as this (where we've well established the general result.) Maybe yes. Maybe no.

      Great call on the Network quote, though...as I think the context in which it appears in the movie is quite apt for your general point.

      --

      Do You Experiment?
    23. Re:Witness the fall of the Republic by naoursla · · Score: 1

      The cancelled TV show is an economic fight. The network says, "this shows is not profitable to produce." The fans say, "Look at how many of us there are. Surely we are large enough in numbers to make this project worthwhile." It is a simple argument that is relatively easy to quantify.

      Protests against the war go something like this:
      P: "Stop the war! Bring our children back! We love them and miss them and don't want them to die!"
      G: "Your children are doing their duty to serve their country. You should be proud of them."
      P: "But this war is wrong. Innocent people are dieing."
      G: "Those people are trying to kill us. We have to kill them first. Innocent casualties are regrettable but unavoidable."
      P: "But the war was started on false pretenses. Those people aren't really trying to kill us."
      G: "Our intelligence says they are. We have more information than you do and therefore more ability to make a correct decision."

      Maybe the govenment is right. Maybe the protesters are right. It is much more difficult to tell.

      One way in which it is similar is that businesses involved with the war are making a lot of money. Those businesses have a lot of influence in the government. We could try to argue to those businesses that they would make more money without the war than not, but we would be wrong.

      And now I'm rambling and don't know what point I'm trying to make.

  15. What about farscape? by Da+w00t · · Score: 4, Informative

    "This is expected to become the largest ever fan campaign to bring a television show back from cancellation."

    I've never seen Jericho, and I bet the series is great, (I just watch very little TV nowadays) but

    This makes me wonder how this will compare to the "save farscape" media frenzy that lots and lots of 'scapers took action to get Sci-Fi's rectal-cranial inversion syndrome diagnosed, and cured. It was on CNN Headline News for chrissakes!

    All in all, I'll probally check out Jericho now. Good luck to all the Jericho fans, I hope you get your show back.

    --

    da w00t. mtfnpy?
    1. Re:What about farscape? by olman · · Score: 1, Troll


      I've never seen Jericho, and I bet the series is great, (I just watch very little TV nowadays) but


      It isn't. Or was not.

    2. Re:What about farscape? by paleo2002 · · Score: 1

      Sci-Fi channel basically perfected the act of giving fans the finger, but CBS seems to have done a pretty good job too. You can't expect a network to keep a show with low ratings (Jericho) or one that isn't popular with its 14-yr old, WWE-watching, illiterate target audience (Farscape) on the air. But they can at least have the decency to give the people who were watching some closure.

  16. bah by INeededALogin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Talk to me in 3.5 years and lets see if Jericho is still in the top 100 of amazon sales.

    1. Re:bah by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      Yep, right behind Jesse Stone: Death in Paradise, a made for TV movie starring Tom Selleck.

    2. Re:bah by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I've never really been convinced that the strong sales of Firefly DVDs have ever meant that much. In the first place, a quick look at the Amazon top 50 (which Firefly doesn't make) has a number of canceled shows that had a cult following when they were out (Babylon 5 is the obvious example) but are barely remembered outside of fan circles.

      And second, Firefly's sales would be boosted by the fact that fans of the shows pretty much had to get the DVD set in order to watch all the episodes. This is a show that was canceled after only some episodes had been shown, many of which had been shown in the wrong order. People who liked the series pretty much had to get the DVDs to make complete sense of it, something that's not true of most other shows. As a result, DVD sales are somewhat artificially boosted.

      I'm not saying Firefly is bad or good, never watched it personally, I just think the metric fans use is, well, ridiculous. There are perfectly good explanations for the DVD set doing well. Conversely, it strikes me as likely that the Jericho DVD set will not do so well, because fans will not have any serious questions answered by it, and will not be overly happy with the idea of buying it in the first place.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:bah by gilroy · · Score: 1

      You're right. People had to buy the Firefly discs. They had to decide to commit $50ish to get 13 episodes, many of which they probably didn't see on TV due to Fox' crazy scheduling. They had to see a series shown out of order and believe it was worth watching. And of course, Firefly also ends abruptly, with major questions unanswered and the Big Bad Plot just beginning to be revealed.

      Yet, with all those reasons not to buy, people went out and bought it anyway. Babylon 5 had five years to build a fan base and had a complete arc with a definite end. (OK, and then an extra, useless season, but hey...) Firefly had enough time to do little more than promise something good, and it was brutally clear that promise was not going to be fulfilled on network TV. People bought the discs anyway.

      But all of the yin and yang here is irrelevant. What mattered about the Firefly sales is, they were sales... people committing cold, hard cash -- the only thing TV executives actually give a damn about. And people are still committing that cash, three years after cancellation.

    4. Re:bah by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Yet, with all those reasons not to buy,

      "Not" to buy?

      You just listed reasons why it was necessary for Firefly fans to buy. At worst, you might have listed reasons why the show might have had fewer fans, but amongst the fans that existed, it was far more necessary for them to buy the DVD set than, say, Babylon 5 fans ever needed to buy their DVD sets.

      But all of the yin and yang here is irrelevant. What mattered about the Firefly sales is, they were sales... people committing cold, hard cash -- the only thing TV executives actually give a damn about. And people are still committing that cash, three years after cancellation

      To ignore the reasons why people are buying the DVD sets and simply focus on the fact sales are high is foolish. There's no good reason for a network to pick the show up again if the only reason why sales are high is because a small, hard core, of fans are buying it so they can watch the whole thing. If, on the other hand, there was a large fan base, and it was buying the DVD set despite the fact that the majority of fans buying the DVD sets had seen all the episodes anyway, that might be a strong reason to consider starting a show up again.

      Family Guy and Futurama were revived precisely because the latter situation existed. Despite high sales of both the DVDs of the series and Serenity, there, on the face of it, appears to be little evidence that there is anything like a sizable viewer base for the show. In the end, the networks want to know that if they put a show on, the viewers will be there, enough viewers to justify the budget and bring in the advertisers. The claim Firefly fans have that high sales of the DVD imply high viewer figures does not seem to be born out by circumstances.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:bah by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      The claim Firefly fans have that high sales of the DVD imply high viewer figures does not seem to be born out by circumstances.

      OK. So what are the lines of evidence that says otherwise? Because I think the prima facie implication of high sales is that, you know, someone is buying them. If millions of sets sell, that would seem to imply that millions of people want to watch the show. I concede that these might be other explanations, but none of them are as obvious as that.
  17. Let it rest in peace by Lurker2288 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I enjoyed the show, but I feel okay that it ended where it did. The so-called cliffhanger pretty well summed up the whole spirit of the show: stuff's really messed up, some people will descend into savagery, but others will hang together and try to keep things soldiering on. Sure, if they did decide to bring it back, we might learn how that final battle would have ended, but where to from there? Better to end on something of a high point* than to fizzle through a second, lackluster season.

    *I say something of a high point because upon reviewing, it's clear how much better the early episodes were compared to the later ones. The more we learned about the bombs and the plot behind them, the less interesting the whole story became.

  18. Re:Its not going to waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, you got me for not R-ingTFA (I wrote the bit about feeding the poor), but what I imagined was the case isn't unbelievable this day and age.

  19. American Idol You? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I think the uproar would have been greater if American Idol was pushed off by any other TV show.

    CBS just went with the bigger crowd. Live with it.

  20. Money well spent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peanuts aren't nuts.

    1. Re:Money well spent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What's the deal with corn nuts?"

  21. The 3 paths to cancelation by Nymz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Watered-down - If a show is good, and gets good ratings, TPTB will require more seasons to be produced, than can be reasonably sustained at the same quality of the current story arc.

    Word-of-Mouth - If a show is good, but gets so-so ratings in the begining, TPTB will cancel it before word of mouth can have an effect.

    Sabotage - If any show is sabotaged by TPTB then there is no saving it. Examples are playing episodes out or order, or postponing the 2-hour premiere that introduces all the characters, to air as the season finale.

    1. Re:The 3 paths to cancelation by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      That's part of why I love the BBC lately -- they're not afraid to just have a show and say "it will end on this date" right at the beginning. I wouldn't have watched Life on Mars if it had been an American show, because I would have assumed it would just get more convoluted and never really go anywhere. But the creators said "we're doing this for two seasons, and at the end of the last episode, you'll know what happened".

      It was a great show, highly entertaining, well-written, and best of all still leaves room for a lot of personal interpretation (and friendly debate) of the show's "reality", precisely because they didn't tie themselves up with needless complications dragging it out across 5+ seasons.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    2. Re:The 3 paths to cancelation by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      No, instead of dragging out one show over five seasons, they spin off a companion show" and play out those extra seasons to ever diminishing returns.

    3. Re:The 3 paths to cancelation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you have seen "Ashes to Ashes" have you? Got any other information from the future you would like to share with us? If you powers only work with BBC television programmes how about revealing tonight's lottery numbers?

    4. Re:The 3 paths to cancelation by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Life on Mars had a really crappy ending in both seasons though.

      Season 1's ending felt "oh fuck, we have a real ending but need a second season" and Season 2's ending felt like a cop out, they never explained anything and just cut it off as it came close.

      --
      I like muppets.
    5. Re:The 3 paths to cancelation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How sad that you forgot the one path demontsrated by this show:

      Nuclear holocaust - Takes out TV transmitters, cast and crew, and most of the audience

  22. The big insult... by TobyRush · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...isn't that CBS cancelled the show, but that it's being axed to make room for New Insipid Reality Show #462 and "Ooh! Pirates!"

    The "Tiffany Network," eh?

    --
    Sam! If you will let me be,
    I will try them.
    You will see.
    1. Re:The big insult... by smallpaul · · Score: 0

      I followed your link and I don't see anything insipid about the show's description at all. It will be a fascinating psychological experiment and if it were broadcast through a subversive OGG video you'd probably think it was an amazingly cool underground thing to watch. But its broadcast on commercial television and therefore mainstream and therefore insipid. (although that implies that Jericho was insipid too, which would jibe with many of the negative reviews in this thread)

    2. Re:The big insult... by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

      Wow. I can't imagine 2 stupider shows. My faith in the human race is significantly diminished by having read that.

    3. Re:The big insult... by sherylb33 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it is appropriate to exploit children for any reason. Many of the "cast" of this show are as young as 8. My family WILL NOT be watching the "experiment" as you called it. To me it seems like LORD OF THE FLIES meets SESEAME STREET! What a disgrace!!

    4. Re:The big insult... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      SO you're saying that skilled writers and actors portraying fictional events with no real connection to reality at all is a far better form of entertainment than skilled editors and producers guiding regular people through a series of real but peformatted events with a somewhat closer connection to reality?

      Hmmm I don't know.... I think it may be a toss up, depending on how skilled the supposedly skilled people are. I was never terribly impressed with Jericho, everything seemed overly urgent all the time, like 24... but maybe you like that? OTOH most 'reality show' do suck balls.... over-directed with poorly cast 'stars' who just don't have the motivation to do anything interesting.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    5. Re:The big insult... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      To me it seems like LORD OF THE FLIES meets SESEAME STREET!

      That sounds totally awesome. I wasn't interested in this show before, but now you put it that way, I think I must watch. How could anybody not want to watch Lord of the Flies meets Sesame Street? It could be even better than Meet the Feebles.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    6. Re:The big insult... by sherylb33 · · Score: 1

      Before deciding to watch the show please remember how reality TV shows work...how the networks twist things around to make particular cast members look totally trashy or ignorant. When an adult decides to put themselves up to be a spectacle in front of the public that's one thing. I have a real problem when a network, and the parents, subject children as young as 8 to that kind of ridicule. I don't know if you are a parent or not. Maybe you have neices, nephews or neighbors but I hope that you will consider what the consequences might be for some of these children you are considering "watching" for your entertainment. Child exploitation is a shame and I am sure the CBS has laywers finding every loophole possible so they can put this on the air. I hope as a citizen ans as an adult you will choose responsibility over curiosity. Some things are just wrong!

  23. Funny enough submission by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Funny
    I haven't sen the show, but this was a good laugh... What arw you going to do with all those peanuts? Throw a humungous party? Just get a Beer sponsor and throw a party!

    On the other hand - one series that I'm missing is Max Headroom, it's dark, it's about a near future and it's all about money, media companies, viewer figures and shady affairs. (Sounds familiar?)

    It may be time to pick up the show again - the old episodes are a little outdated; no internet, no flat-screen TV:s etc.

    But on the other hand RIAA and MPAA may not want to see this...

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:Funny enough submission by JackHoffman · · Score: 1

      Max Headroom

      YES. Where do I send my nuts?

    2. Re:Funny enough submission by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Bringing back Max would be interesting, but difficult.

      First, forget the original actors--they're all too old (hey, so am I). Second, I think there would be less of a "Gee-Whiz" effect as much of what goes on has come about.

      It would definitely need a "re-imagining."

    3. Re:Funny enough submission by Octopus · · Score: 1

      On the other hand - one series that I'm missing is Max Headroom, it's dark, it's about a near future and it's all about money, media companies, viewer figures and shady affairs. (Sounds familiar?) Matt Frewer is wasting away over on Eureka, which should have a new season coming soon.

      Not to dis' Eureka, which is entertaining in its own way - but Frewer is pretty brilliant, and shouldn't be stuck playing a psychotic Australian dogcatcher.
    4. Re:Funny enough submission by dkf · · Score: 1

      But on the other hand RIAA and MPAA may not want to see [Max Headroom]...
      Yes they will! Good crib sheet for new nefarious ideas.
      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  24. Good Riddance by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Jericho was a steaming pile of crap. Annoying characters, the worst dialog since Titanic, And don't even get me started on that music. Anyone joining a campaign to save it needs to have their head checked.

  25. Hear hear by jomama717 · · Score: 1

    The will of the people hasn't been lost, it's been hijacked. How's that for irony?

    --
    while [ 1 ]; do echo -n -e "\xe2\x95\xb$((($RANDOM&1)+1))"; done
  26. So like... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    Where were you people when they took The Dating Game off the air?

    --
    What?
  27. Bah, one word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Carnivale"

    If there was ever a show crying out for uncancellation, HBO's Carnivale was it. Wish we'd come up with some gimmick like this. And, please, no nonsense about "it was the show's time to go" with this one. The final episode set up all kinds of fascinating places to explore, with the whole series maintaining interest throughout. The writers had four more seasons planned. That was one that got killed in its prime!

    1. Re:Bah, one word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree, two words:

      Twin Peaks

      Like Carnivale it died after its second season, after a cliff-hanger finale. While I don't know how many more seasons it could've gotten, at least one more should've.

  28. Brown Coats Unite.... by waterford0069 · · Score: 1

    Shiny! I'm sure we can do _at_least_ 20,000 pounds of Ramen to whatever gorram executive cancelled our show.

  29. Mod up by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 2, Informative

    Parent is right. And this is no ordinary "don't you have better things to do with your time/money" troll. It's not like it's that much more effort to send food to the needy via a charity. After all, it is only a TV show...

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  30. The "Nuts" reference - Battle of the Bulge by Etherwalk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Brigadier General Anthony McAuliffe was the acting commander of the 101st Airborne Division in the Battle of Bastongne during the Battle of the Bulge. The 101st was surrounded, outnumbered, and unable to get resupply by air. When Axis forces demanded their surrender, McAuliffe's one-word response was "Nuts."

    Obviously, after sixty years, this necessarily led to trying to save a canceled show with peanuts.

    1. Re:The "Nuts" reference - Battle of the Bulge by necrogram · · Score: 1

      The ballsy part of the story that tend to go untold, is the corpal that delivered the response. He walked over to the German command, and was asked what McAuliffe meant. His answer? "It means you know where to shove it and where you can go"

    2. Re:The "Nuts" reference - Battle of the Bulge by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Cite? You're right, I haven't heard that part of the story.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    3. Re:The "Nuts" reference - Battle of the Bulge by Main+Gauche · · Score: 1

      As chance would have it, I was in Bastogne in March, and saw the museum.

      The museum described something close to what GP posted (though with a little less elaboration). Now keep in mind I was hearing a Belgian describing the way English ("Nuts") was explained to a German 60 odd years ago, so this is not an exact science. But the story being told in the Bastogne museum is that "Nuts" had to be explained to the German general, and that he was told it meant "something like 'Go to Hell'" by the translator.

    4. Re:The "Nuts" reference - Battle of the Bulge by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Funny I thought the ballsy part was actually holding out while being cut off and out numbered. BTW my father served with the 101st Airborne.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  31. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new nutty.... Forget it.

  32. all this and Firefly fans get fuct by DragonTHC · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Brilliant world.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
    1. Re:all this and Firefly fans get fuct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... firefly fans got a -film-.

  33. I guess it fits with the show... by McFailure · · Score: 1

    Since the show dealt with terrorists, maybe this is a massive attack against all of the people at CBS that are allergic to peanuts.

    (Simpsons)"BOMBARDMENT! BOMBARDMENT! BOMBARDMENT!"(/Simpsons)

    1. Re:I guess it fits with the show... by Zekasu · · Score: 1

      You sir, are an idiot. It did not deal with "terrorists", but with love triangles in a post-nuclear world. Get your facts straight! Gosh.

  34. Fair or free? by CriminalNerd · · Score: 0

    I think I've been exposed to too many Amnesty International announcements at my school, but I have to ask...are those nuts fair-trade nuts or free-trade nuts?

  35. Way too much effort over THAT PARTICULAR TV show by tylernt · · Score: 1

    Jericho was crap. Good riddance.
    Speaking as a Jericho fan, I agree. I think most of the consternation is the fact that they canceled the series after one doozie of a cliffhanger. I don't really care if there's a second season, but we at least need one more episode to tie up some loose ends, mmmmmkay?
    --
    DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
  36. Jericho? by killerdark · · Score: 1

    Hey.... It IS TV... What? You still watch that analog stuff? Grow up will you? (Yeah you got me. I never even heard of it)

    --
    A tadpole is a pollywog
  37. You Fools! by SQL+Error · · Score: 4, Funny

    Peanuts are legumes!

    The TV industry will never take us seriously now. :(

  38. Holland style Hurricane Protection? by McDutchie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its all aout priorities, but on New Orleans, I sincerely think that reconstruction of that city is a vain task unless it will recieve Proper (Holland style) Category 5 Hurricane Protection.

    Holland style? I would hope not, as Holland doesn't get any hurricanes. That's a good thing too, because we'd be well and truly fucked if we did.

    1. Re:Holland style Hurricane Protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats because they have protection!

    2. Re:Holland style Hurricane Protection? by dkf · · Score: 1

      While Holland hardly ever gets hurricanes, it does get European windstorms from time to time, which can be just as bad. Indeed, the storm of 1953 is infamous, with total deaths estimated at over 2400; it prompted the construction of the comprehensive flood barrier system that the citizens of NO have been envying since Katrina...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  39. for the love of god by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

    fire the writers and hire some technical advisers who know what they fuck would actually happen then bring the show back.

  40. Just watch Threads.... by Nim82 · · Score: 1

    It's a far better look at what could happen if the bomb dropped - none of this watered down drivel.

    Alternately, Jeremiah was also a far better written post-apoc series, though it's a lot more fantastical.

  41. Firefly fans, not to be outdone by Jericho fans, by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

    rally late in the game gathering $32,000 to send 12 tons of scrap metal to the doors of Fox Studios roughly resembling a sculpture of Jane.

    --
    No sig for you! Come back one year!
  42. Re:Its not going to waste by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1, Troll

    Your entire comment does not have to be a two line long hyperlink.

  43. No second season? CBS ARE GOING NUTS! by zukinux · · Score: 1

    I think this sums it all :
    No second season? CBS are going nuts!

  44. Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this a scam just to push nuts from this website? Aren't the guys running the whole 'lets sent nuts to CBS' the owners of this nutsonline website?

  45. And to think... by msimm · · Score: 1

    Some people say we're vapid. (:

    Good old American values!

    --
    Quack, quack.
  46. Re:Way too much effort over THAT PARTICULAR TV sho by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    we at least need one more episode to tie up some loose ends, mmmmmkay?

    I think you have a better chance looking here to find closure than waiting for a network to revive it.

    Blame the producers. They must have know they were on the skids; instead of facing it and wrapping it up they leave a bad taste in everyone's mouth with an unresolved cliffhanger. Personally I've never seen it; it was on my list of things to watch when the DVD was available, but now, knowing that it's cut short, I won't bother at all.

  47. bah! kids today... by rarel · · Score: 1

    In the Old days of the Republic, we could have sent a thousand nuts to a thousand execs to have them obey our slightest whims...

    1. Re:bah! kids today... by mhochman · · Score: 1

      Your shoes are too tight.

  48. What fans should really do to get the show back... by bocaJWho · · Score: 1

    ...Go out and buy the DVDs. It wasn't sending massive amounts of food to Fox that resulted in Serenity being made, it was the phenomenal DVD sales that made the network realize that they were missing out on a ton of money. If Jericho DVD sales doubled overnight, you can bet that CBS would at least order a direct to DVD movie to tie up loose ends, but 9 tons of peanuts simply isn't worth that much to them.

  49. Fuck Jericho by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll go one step further and say what needs to be said here.

    Fuck Jericho.

    Interesting premise?
    yes

    Interesting execution?
    Not from the first fucking episode.

    Friends of mine were obsessed with Jericho, but jesus, Jericho's writers couldnt write drama for shit.
    Not even deaf meghan could save it for me, and she's fucking awesome.

    'OMG, the world is coming to an end! but wait, you know what's even more interesting? bland interpersonal drama and bullshit quasi-moralistic plotlines and the melodramitcist of all melodramatic skeet ulrich performances!'

    Dont care... dont care... *DONT* *CARE*

    Fuck Jericho. With so much *decent* television on, its no wonder that CBS decided to pull a fox and replace a lackluster, if rabidly followed and obsessed over by its 3 fans, serial drama with a REALITY SHOW ABOUT CHILDREN BEING LEFT TO RUN A TOWN BY THEMSELVES. Yes, Jericho got replaced with Lord of The Flies 2: Electric Booglaloo: Lord of The Flies Reality TV.

    Yes, this is flamebait.
    Yes, I'm an asshole.
    But,
    No, I'm not wrong.
    Fuck Jericho.

    Shomer-FUCKING-shabbas!

    --
    Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
  50. someone has to say it: by ImTheDarkcyde · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have any idea what would happen if Soviet Russia were to cancel a television show?

    1. Re:someone has to say it: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, couldn't happen. In Soviet Russia (Britain), they film you.

    2. Re:someone has to say it: by murderlegendre · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh sure, In Soviet Russia, nuts send CBS to you!

      --
      There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
    3. Re:someone has to say it: by Teancum · · Score: 1

      This "In Soviet Russia" joke actually make sense and is somewhat based on reality.

      It is a bunch of nut cases with mental health problems that are sending CBS to me every day.

      Thanks... this one fits in more ways than one.

  51. on the other side.. by ekran · · Score: 1

    on the other side there is a lot more and better series that were recently canceled (bsg only gets one more season, whimp, cry) -- anyway, a 'feelgood' post nucklear drama where people are sitting at a caffee drinking cappuchino a few weeks after the bombs have fallen is probably not what the audience expects. Though I must say that it wastly improves towards the end of the season. Could it be that CBS canceled the show based on the reception it got at the begining, because to be honest, it did really suck then.

  52. Re:Its not going to waste by mdarksbane · · Score: 3, Funny

    So how long until a homeless guy who is allergic to peanuts sues CBS?

  53. Far better protest by faloi · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be better for all the people that watched the show, if they're truely that upset, to just not watch that network anymore? I would think losing number of the people that watch your network because the show they liked was no longer being played would make more of an impact than sending some nuts to the corporate office.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Far better protest by Megane · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be better for all the people that watched the show, if they're truely that upset, to just not watch that network anymore?

      Is there anything worth watching on CBS that people can quit watching? There are only two things I watch on CBS these days: David Letterman and Craig Ferguson, and I don't watch them regularly. And I think that really is it, aside from one non-network weekend show on that station.

      Meanwhile, Heroes did it right by resolving the season plot, and only then ending with a few minor cliffhangers to start the second season.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  54. The lawsuits haven't even begun yet... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Oh, and I mean the ones by CBS because a guy in the mail room is allergic to peanuts and the packages weren't clearly marked. That first one is legit.
    The second one will be from twelve of the the mail clerk's friends who will claim mental anguish over the loss of companionship of their co-worker, then the vet bills for one of the the suing-co-worker's twin siamese cats who are out of sorts from the stress of the lawsuit... lathter rinse, repeat...

    Hey, if Josh Hancock's dad can sue the driver of the disabled car and the tow truck that Hancock hit in a drunken stupor, this isn't too far off.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  55. Bring it back by bgingras · · Score: 1

    NUTS to CBS...bring back Jericho www.nutsonline.com www.jericholives.com

  56. In Soviet-Russia ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 0

    In Soviet-Russia television kills you!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  57. Why such actions for tv and not for reality? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Totally not meant to troll (own opinion); I still do wonder myself why it is more possible for people to protest for television shows and not against their current way of their government deals with them. Is television so much important next to privacy and environment?

    Such actions against the government would for sure wake up -some- sleeping animals and would for sure also attract the attention of a lot more people because of the media. I call such action "thrown away" only to get back a television show while it could be lots bigger than that. OK; great for them fans, but, couldn't that amount of money be spend more wisely to protect eachothers lives and interests on a way higher level?

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    1. Re:Why such actions for tv and not for reality? by yellobelli · · Score: 1

      I think the people hwo are protesting over this are the ones who shake things up in general. Encourage them here, and we can encourage them in other avenues. I'll back David over Goliath just about anytime!

  58. Money Well Spent? by andysomm · · Score: 1

    I have read the many comments regarding those of us who have contributed money to this "campaign." Many feel that the money could have gone to much more worthy causes. The good thing is that CBS is donating the nuts to homeless shelters in New York City, so the money spent is, indirectly, going to something "worthwhile."

    For me, this is not just about bringing back one canceled show that I happened to really enjoy. It is more about making a personal statement about my upset with the entertainment industry. The second that a project appears to be generating less revenue for the mother ship, it gets tossed out like so much other cosmic debris. I just can't take being treated like this any more.

    Finally, what I find insulting, they filled Jericho's time slot with a reality show called "Kid Nation." Ouch.

  59. obligatory by savuporo · · Score: 1

    Kung pow> Thats a lot of nuts! http://kungpownuts.ytmnd.com/

    --
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
  60. Hate Jericho fans? Why? by roundrockhorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To all the haters, we get your point. I would remind each of you however that many years ago a letter writing campaign saved a show called Star Trek and got it two more seasons. Back then, that was unheard of but today campaigns of this nature (Save Jericho) and size are also unheard of. I'd like to remind the posters here that were it not for shows like Star Trek, a lot of our technological comforts might not exist today. Star Trek caused people to think about the technology involved and inspired generations of fans to create, explore and experiment with new technologies.

    In a very loose comparison, Jericho has also caused many people to stop and think. In a world that is often times uncertain, Jericho took us away from our usual worries and got us to examine ourselves a little more closely.

    In a world gone completely mad, the residents of Jericho struggled to keep their humanity about them. What would any of us do in the same situation? The show challenged us to think about just such a possibility. I grew up in the Cold War era and I remember a movie called The Day After. Back then, we had to think about a full out Nuclear War. Today we have to think about dirty bombs. Not much difference is there?

    So, while you may hate the fans of this show for trying to save it, remember that a movement like this can show what's best about humanity because we have pulled together people from all over the free world and united them in one common voice. We've done it faster than anyone ever has and in larger numbers as well. CBS wanted to reach the 18-49 market and with new delivery methods like the Internet. They did reach us, but failed to recognize it and canceled our show. Now, we will fight to get it back and no ammount of criticism will impede us from finishing what we started. Keep hating our movement if you must, but we'll keep on truckin'.

    20,000lbs of nuts, an ad in Variety and The Hollywood Insider, articles in the NYT, ABCnews.com, E!, syfiportal and countless local media outlets have been the first wave of our voices being heard. We know that they are being heard b/c the cBS execs have failed to strike the sets and have stopped returning the rented props for the show. Thanks to slashdot for helping us get the word out.

    If you are interested in seeing what the show is about go to cbs.com\jericho and watch the episodes. If you lost interest in the middle of the season, go watch the second helf...it was really good. The love triangle is just a natural part of humantiy in a situation like that and was a part of the show...like it or not. It is resolved, and they move on in the second part of the season.

    Save Jericho
    NUTS to cBS
    Thanks to nutsonline.com
    jerichorallypoint.com
    Shaun O'Mac and his radio show
    and countless others who are working tirelessly to coordinate our campaign.

    Joint the fight...it's not too late.

  61. I could care less about Jericho... by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    but now I really want some freakin peanuts!

    I've never watched the show, never had even heard of it, and maybe the NutsOnline guys hadn't either.. but at least they're making money like never before.. I'm left with a major craving for peanuts. Half tempted to order from NutsOnline myself and see if they're even any good (assuming I'll get the order before the end of the year).

    Hm.

  62. David and Goliath by yellobelli · · Score: 1

    I, for one, am going to be backing these guys. I agree with everything one of the PPs said. This show got lame in a big hurry. Good premise, too much kissing. That being said, I think sticking it to CBS is a great idea.

  63. Actually, yes. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    It's not that a TV show is more important in the grand scheme of things, but as a prefered form of entertainment which has a weekly impact on these people it really does affect them more.

    Trying to put it in perspective:

    1. If statistics are correct, most of the people who watch that show haven't flown on a commercial airline in the last year. Almost 1% of their waking time every week is spent watching the show. The show has higher priority simply because of the promenent spot it occupies in their life. If they flew once a month or more frequently, they'd probably be more interested in what the TSA is up to.

    2. $26,000 is nothing. Oh, it's a noticable gesture, but it has no real impact in the world of politics, or desease research, or world hunger. I recently learned that it costs about $300,000/yr to even get a sniff at hiring a lobbiest to fight for your cause in Washington. Most foodbanks have effective budgets in the millions/yr. Treating AIDS can easily cost over $12k/yr/person for just the drugs. The war in Iraq is burning through about $2200 per second.

    Do I think this is a good way to spend $26,000? Not really, though if it gets the series back for those who really like it it's a good idea for them. We spend a lot of money on frivilous things; this just happens to be a frivilous thing which a lot of people agree on, and it's getting some press. It's really not that big a deal in the grand scheme.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  64. That's becuase Star Trek fans did it right by yellobelli · · Score: 1

    Right now this campaign is being waged by people who just happened to be the biggest posters on the Jericho message board. Trekkies had access to 1)people who know how to make money 2)people who were experienced PR people, advertisers, and marketers 3)people who used spellcheck The Jericho bunch has a chance to get it together. They have branded themselves well with the nuts. I don't think they will come anywhere near Star Trek's 3 million, but I think over 100,000 is a possibility. for a CBS show, that's pretty good ;-)

    1. Re:That's becuase Star Trek fans did it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >They have branded themselves well with the nuts.

      You can say that again.

  65. Re: and there is no way I could've been involved by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Funny

    OK, the 1970s was known as the sexual revolution but I have a lot of arguments about this craziness. First, the demographics CBS is trying to reach by canceling Jericho - most weren't even born in the '70s yet! I was born in the early 70s and there is no way I could've been involved in any type of sexual revolution at the time!

    Um... you could be a product of it

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  66. Re:Hate Jericho fans? Why? by Rachelb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree with you. Jericho was one of the only shows on tv I could actually watch with my family. I am sick of reality shows and the mindless fluff the networks want me to watch. Finally, we had an action-packed, thought-provoking drama. I loved the show, love the characters and feel that we are being cheated by this cancellation. The network put it on the airs, got me interested and watching then they pull the plug. The show did better in the ratings than many others that actually were renewed for another season. I think this campaign gives tv viewers an ideal place to make their voices heard. We have had enough. We want our show back. I think the people taking part in this are terrific. To those who see this as a waste of time, please go save the world on the 'politics' section. Oh, and by the way, Fighting for a tv show does not stop you from fighting for more 'worthwhile' causes.

  67. Jericho Rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give the people what they want! They want Jericho! Some guys have their computers, we have Jericho! Let's all just get along

  68. Support the SHOW, not the NETWORK by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

    Damn, I wish this post could have been higher in the thread, but here it is anyway.

    This is why I hope that on-demand programming over the Internet, using services such as iTunes or something similar, eventually takes off. To do away with the networks completely.

    Think about it. What if Jericho wasn't beholden to the networks to decide their fate? What if instead of sending peanuts to CBS, you could donate a few bucks to the show's production company instead? If you're a loyal viewer of the show, would you be willing to pay $2 an episode, or $30-$40 bucks for an entire second season of it? I know that for the shows I like, I sure would, especially if I didn't have that stupid cable/satellite bill to pay (which I don't any more, incidentally.

    Wouldn't it be nice if whether or not you watch Jericho did not depend on if CBS wanted to put another Dancing with the Stars clone on in its time slot? With on-demand payment and viewing, you can have an infinite number of time slots, and whether or not a show gets picked up and/or renewed would depend entirely on whether or not the viewers of that show were willing to directly support it financially.

    This would also have a great impact on the quality of programming, too. For one thing, with big corporate advertising sponsors out of the picture (or at least, relegated to minor financial support instead), shows' creators would have complete artistic freedom over their shows. If they want to take on a controversial subject, as long as people are willing to pay to see it, they could have at it. If they wanted to appeal to a niche audience, as long as people are willing to pay to see it, they could have at it. You get the idea.

    Personally, I never cared for Jericho. But hey, if you and enough other people do, then by all means, it shouldn't be killed just because millions of people aren't watching it on CBS.

    1. Re:Support the SHOW, not the NETWORK by Teancum · · Score: 1

      And you don't think that current television producers take into account DVD sales?

      It surprises me that for at least some of the series franchises, such as Stargate or Star Trek, that there hasn't been a "direct to video" TV series just for fans made of original material. Charging fans $10 per episode would not be unreasonable in a market like this, where the pressed discs, materials, and shipping costs are less than $1 per disc. For crying out loud, I can buy some DVD-Video discs for $1 per disc retail.... at the checkout counter.

      So how much would somebody be willing to pay for a 1 hour direct-to-video Farscape episode? With the option that it may also be used "in syndication" at some point in the future and marketed to independent television stations?

      It seems as though the budget (except for talent costs... which are debatable as always) for Jericho isn't too high to try this as at least an experiment and produce a few extra episodes just for fans to gague the viability of this model.

      It's just too bad that people in a position in the movie industry to read crazy ideas like this won't read these posts.

    2. Re:Support the SHOW, not the NETWORK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the most intelligent response I have seen on here. It really isn't about the show so much as the Networks having the ability to control what we view and the fate of some very creative programs. The viewers may not be the network's customers but we are the customers of the network's customers. If we aren't happy, the advertisers aren't happy and sometimes shit does roll uphill.

      I'm not entirely certian how the ratings system works, but I, myself, do NOT have a black box and several of my favorite shows have been cancelled with insane and terrible new reality shows put in their place. I also live in Canada and we are at the mercy of the US networks here. We are viewers that don't have a voice at all. We pay good money to have satellite viewing and cable viewing to no avail and with no voice when it comes to the american networks. A lot of the products advertized on the networks are products we also get up here and so it can't be said that we are not in the same marketplace. Kraft and Coca Cola and Rasin Bran are all consumed up here as well.

      I agree that there needs to be a better system. It would be great if we could subscribe to the shows we like, thus supporting those shows rather than the networks. It would be a much better investment than the hundreds of channels in the cable/sattelite bundles we have to purchase to watch a few of our few favorite shows. All of the shows would be on demand each week and we wouldn't have to have Tivo or personal video recorders or go the old way and still keep an old vhs machine around.

      Great comment.

    3. Re:Support the SHOW, not the NETWORK by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      I did support the show. I bought the season 1 package on iTunes. CBS sucks. Hopefully someone else will pick it up, or CBS comes to its senses. It has some great series (The Unit and CSI: Miami are the other two I like from CBS).

  69. Another victim of writer's block by us7892 · · Score: 1

    I cannot agree more. I was interested for the first 10 episodes. There were a couple good story lines to run with. It seems like there have been a few shows on network television like this in the past three years...and the writers pick the WRONG storylines to run with...what the heck!!

    Who is making these decisions? Remember those two or three 'alien' shows? They had some promising development, and then they fell flat...

    I think there just aren't enough good writers to go around...

    1. Re:Another victim of writer's block by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      Remember those two or three 'alien' shows? They had some promising development, and then they fell flat...


      Oh, God, I remember watching Invasion and realizing halfway through the season that I had no more idea what was happening in this world than I did 20 minutes into the first episode. Jericho is a carbon copy of that situation -- let's a take an inherently interesting premise and then never bother to actually see what's happening, just add lots of mysterious behavior and see who has sex.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    2. Re:Another victim of writer's block by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Threshold didn't do that. Threshold actually made a somewhat interesting premise, and stuck with it. And, for once, it was interesting being inside the 'cover up aliens' conspiracy. Almost every episode we learned something new, and there while there was some interesting interpersonal stuff, it was almost all due to the enormous pressure they were operating under, and there were absolutely no love triangles at all.

      The speed of the show is probably due to the fact it was only supposed to run three years, and by at the end of the first year it would become 'Foothold' and then 'Stranglehold' the last year.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  70. Re:Its not going to waste by asninn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Some of the nuts are also on their way to troops in Iraq and Afghanistan through the Staten Island Homefront Project.

    Again: what a waste of food. The donation to City Harvest is great, though.

    (And I know I'm gonna be modded flamebait for not Supporting The Troops(tm), but I'm not gonna censor myself because of that.)

    --
    butter the donkey
  71. And mine to you, sir. by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

    "He found a way to make a buck out of a canceled show. My hats off to him."

    You manage to wear more than one hat at a time?

    --
    He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
  72. Weeds by silentbob_midway · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remember the cliffhanger from the season 2 finale of Weeds? Maybe Showtime will cancel Weeds to see what the fans will send in....

  73. Re:Hate Jericho fans? Why? by sherylb33 · · Score: 1

    Well stated. Jericho is a quality tv program that every member of my family enjoys. I think that the writers do a fantastic job including story lines that would appeal to every member of our family. Our family of 7 (ages 42 to 10) is proud to support the Save Jericho campaign. We decided that this quality program was worth investing our time into. I get up a little earlier and go to bed a little later writing emails and snail mail, we call and yes we have ordered nuts also. For my family this show is wonderful entertainment. We monitor what is viewed by our children and not once during any episonde did I have to cringe and turn off the TV due to language or content. Jericho is an interesting and entertaining program that we would like to see back on the fall schedule.

  74. Re:Firefly fans, not to be outdone by Jericho fans by Belacgod · · Score: 1

    If you were e real Browncoat you'd know it was spelled Jayne.

  75. What this fight is really about by ToledoSteve · · Score: 1

    The battle to save jericho is more than just trying to keep a great show on the air. It is also an attempt to get the major networks to adapt to the realities of "new media." Due to high production costs, only broadcast TV has the resources to create high-quality, serial dramas, yet the networks still see enamored by the lower costs of reality TV. Of course, the web has the competitive advantage when it comes to producing "reality-based" programming. Networks will continue to hemorrhage viewers until they focus on their strengths and leave the "reality" shows to people who still have some sense of what reality is. Therefore, the fight to save Jericho is really a fight to save CBS from itself.

    1. Re:What this fight is really about by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1

      Therefore, the fight to save Jericho is really a fight to save CBS from itself. Really? Then I shall withdraw my support for Jericho, if that will result in CBS destroying itself.

      I for one wish I could have back all those wasted evenings watching NBC/ABC/CBS shit-coms!
      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    2. Re:What this fight is really about by ratinadress · · Score: 1

      Dont let CBS win this battle...change the way these tv networks view their shows and the viewers FOREVER...

      This is about more than Jericho..its old media vs new media and old way of metering viewers vs the new media revolution.

      CBS built an immense online presense for JERICHO, encouraged people to get involved and watch the show online and now they are taking Jericho away...

      CBS bemoans the demo and how the young people are not watching on TV..hello?? They are watching on TV and online on the platform YOU built and encouraged people to use..

      The Nielsens have been a flawed way of looking at viewing habits of TV shows for years...Are you going to let the select few with those precious Nielsen meters decide what the REST of us are going to watch???

      Again this fight is important to Jericho but more important that we the viewers be heard about how popularity of tv shows are figured out now in this new age..

      If you are sick and tired of these holier than thou network executives disrespecting audiences by putting shows on and then yanking them off the air or bouncing them around the schedule with ruthless disregard for its audience...this is your fight..

      If your sick and tired of being force fed this reality tv show garbage like a crack addict then this is your fight !!

      If you want the networks to give us more quality original programming that is not a spin off or rip off of another series...then this is your fight.

      If your a cable tv fan who wants a show to be able to come back to the networks for..then this is your fight

      If television itself is ever going to evolve back into what it was meant to be...then this is your fight..

      In the end even if we do not prevail in this battle, CBS will surely know we were here and we will have left a mark on CBS for years to come....

      CBS and its egomaniacal executives have to be reminded that yes we the audience DO matter.

      These days ahead are long and treacherous and we are dealing with a billion dollar heartless corporation..remember we are their viewing public, if we do not win this we can ultimately win by NOT watching CBS.

      CBS would think they won in the short run but in the long run they will be the true losers...

      Now push ahead and speak out to the media and all who will hear you...

      Get up off your chairs and couches and do something...MAKE A DIFFERENCE !!!

  76. Save Jericho! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are a fan, we need you to get involved - ASAP

  77. I don't actually hate TV, but I do hate peanuts by Captain+Vittles · · Score: 1

    I hate television. I hate it as much as I hate peanuts. But I can't stop eating peanuts. - Orson Welles

  78. What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That money could have been donated to charities for the poor and hungry. I'm glad these people feel a TV show is more important then human lives.

    People need to get their priorities straight.

  79. Kung Pow, anyone? by Vituperator · · Score: 2, Funny

    Chosen one: I'll take a pound of nuts. Shopkeeper: *yelling* That's a lot of nuts! That'll be four bucks, baby! You want fries with that?!?

  80. Re:Hate Jericho fans? Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A little advice. Once the upfronts happen you're going to need a miracle to get on the schedule. I'm not saying it's never happened, but the size of you're campaign isn't unprecedented. Roswell fans raised over $25k in one fundraiser and donated the money to help fight hunger in the name of the show. Part of their success what because they got the show and cast to donate things to the fundraiser because it was for charity. Also, fans usually had more than one save-our-show campaign a year and those smaller onces dealt with buying ads in Variety. So you may or may not have the largest campaign to date, but the size is definitely not "unheard of."

    I liked Jericho so I'm not tried to say that you should give up. Just a bit of caution not to rest on your achievements. Also remember, it's not about the press or popularity, it's about the profit to the network and studio. Does anything in this campaign tell them that they are going to or can make more money next year (or sellabled items)?

  81. Podcast productions presents ... by crovira · · Score: 1

    If you're talking about putting a show on the scant and expen^H^H^H^H^H scarce air waves, sure let it die.

    But if you're talking about keeping the show going for their audience, "Nuts" to you.

    They could run a podcast production, and distribute it that way too, until there's not enough people interested in doing it anymore; until there's not enough fans writing new episodes etcetera.

    Just because it can't compete for the expen^H^H^H^H^H scarce air waves, doesn't mean it can't survive on another medium.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  82. How it ends by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
    I have a friend who works on the show, and he told me how the cliffhanger was planned to be resolved.

    *Warning - Spoiler follows*

    Pam wakes up from a fitful sleep, goes into the bathroom and opens the shower door, and Bobby steps out. It turns out that it was all a dream and they're back in Dallas together again.

  83. Speaking of Holland style Hurricane Protection? by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1

    Money was originally budgeted and a Holland-style flooding protection system was started in New Orleans back in the late 1970s. The reason it was never completed has nothing to do with government incompetence, corruption, or the Army Corps of Engineers. It was never completed because the crazy psycho environmentalists kept suing the government over the project, and after a couple of hundred lawsuits, the budget was GONE, and the project was cancelled!!!

  84. each to their own by loosestones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been reading many of the comments over the Jericho issue the last week and, not that I am not singling you out specifically as you comments are somewhat benign, but I feel I must add my thoughts to the issue. It seems many feel Jericho should be cancelled because they do not like it. Surely this is the wrong reason. I own the DVD of Sliders, Stargate SG1 and Atlantis, Lone Gunmen, Harsh Realm, Outer Limits, Dead Like Me, Firefly, Deep Space 9 ... and the list continues. I obviously have a preference for certain story lines. My daughter and I have similar tastes, but some of the shows she likes ... well I would sooner have my teeth removed. I am sure the same is true for her on some shows I watch.

    In many of these series the stories weakened and they eventually disappeared, but for the most part I faithfully watched them and held out hope they would improve. Ironically StarGate SG1 was one of those shows I hated during the first, fifth and ninth seasons, but eventually I found the story improved making the wait worth while. You mention Sliders, I can't stand it, any season, but my daughter likes it. I hated Enterprise when it started, and my daughter loved it; by the end of the forth season when it was cancelled I was a regular and she was on itunes.

    My wife thinks both my daughter and I are crazy. She like American Idol, and Dancing with the Stars, but hates so you think you can dance. I only watch these shows with her when forced to do so. Ironically none of us have ever felt a need to publically criticize the other's taste in entertainment. For a fact we help each other see our favorite shows.

    So it was with Jericho, my daughter and I have both taken an interest in the show. The characters presented are like my neighbors. Yes my neighbors can be boring, but surprising when place in difficult situations. People tend to look for emotional support during crisis times, love triangles are not unreasonable even if you do not like them. Having characters that are "normal" is so far from the daily TV that has presented to us over the last 30 years, it is not surprising many individuals lost interest. It is hard to compare the Jericho characters to the likes of those portrayed on WKRP, Cheers, Friends, Seinfeld, or the drama of the Survivor Outhouse series, CSI everywhere, and Law and Order.

    I like shows that when I am done viewing them, my imagination is stimulated. Usually I prefer shows not too close to reality. It was a surprise to me when Jericho hit my list of shows to watch. The events Jericho portrays could happen and that disturbs me. Jericho's portrayal of the bombings is no more unreasonable than the Lone Gunmen's portrayal of a plane flying into the world trade center months before it actually happened. Good people in the story die, some individuals abuse power, and it is up to the average person to set things right again. This sound like life to me. For some viewers this story line was boring, the actors sucked, the writing was weak, or it was too disturbing, but for 8 million viewers it is the right story to watch.

    Because of the conflict of scheduling at CBS and my personal activities I was unable to watch Jericho when it was aired, so my daughter recorded it. Before Jericho was cancelled, several of my friends said they stopped watching it because they wanted to see and record American Idol more. They asked to borrow my recordings so they could catch up. I say this does not sound like a show that lost huge support, but one that died because it was not strong enough to gain support when pitted against one of the strongest shows on TV. This schedule was really unfair to the writers actors and viewers of the show. The time slot along with the season splitting doomed the show and those of us who viewed Jericho know this and that is why CBS is in our bad books.

    You might be right, and a second season may perform worse than the first, but without the chance to prove itself we will never know. This is a dra

    1. Re:each to their own by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I say this does not sound like a show that lost huge support, but one that died because it was not strong enough to gain support when pitted against one of the strongest shows on TV.

      I say you are making the all too common mistake of extrapolating from yourself and a few of your friends to 200 million+ TV viewers.
    2. Re:each to their own by loosestones · · Score: 1

      No, I am saying you have the right to ignore Jericho by changing channels. If you do not want to see it come back you do not have to support our efforts with CBS either. You do not have the right to criticize our efforts for attempting to regain what we had.

      I am sure you and the 200+ million TV viewers you claim support your opinion watch a lot of TV that I and my friends wouldn't waste our power on. For most of my friends we seldom turn the TV on because we have no interest in the current programming being offered. I and probably most of my friends have never made any efforts to be public about our views when it comes to TV. I know none of us have written into any site to tell others they are wrong for liking a show, even though that is exactly what we think! I and the 86,000 who have put our names on a petition found Jericho a refreshing change and are willing to fight for it. Is the replacement show offered by CBS something you have seen and liked?

      With so many specialty channels around surely it is not unreasonable that one of them would be interested in picking Jericho up. As I understand it, the only way this could even be an option is if CBS released the rights. They have made no indication they are looking at this. Once again, if Jericho was on a specialty channel, you could turn to whatever you do like or not buy that channel at all.

      As a final comment, one of the people who has viewed the show and liked it was not a friend, but a co-worker. We have nothing in common, not even a liking for the same TV shows. We only work in the same department, but he and his wife loved the show. They didn't know it existed. Is it possible that just maybe some of the 200+ million viewers didn't know about Jericho, and if they saw it might actually like it? You are making a common mistake by assuming that everyone agrees with you. I at least know what the support base was and when you consider all the choices we have for entertainment, it is a healthy number. I am sure there are lots of entertainment providers that would see 8 million viewers as a big success!

  85. The tragic part by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    They won't get what they want with the TV show either.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  86. What do we send to Fox... by Dorceon · · Score: 1

    ...for them to give Drive a fair shake? Cell phones or car keys?

    --
    What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
  87. This may come as a surprise; by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
    From TFA:
     

    CBS -- which apparently still determines programming primarily on Nielsen ratings -- decided to drop the show

    Why are people surprised by this? CBS is a business people - it makes it's money not by producing quality, but by producing shows that people will watch and advertisers thus be induced to buy commercials during. If American TV is crap - it's not because of an evil plot by the networks to produce crap, it's because the American public laps it up in such vast quantities. (And there is not a doubt in my mind that had Jericho even middling ratings - those numbers they now mock would instead be Exhibit A in their campaign. People are like that)
     
    Note: This is not to say Jericho wasn't crap - it was, and derivative crap at that.
    1. Re:This may come as a surprise; by Teancum · · Score: 1

      And you think that the Nielsen ratings are an accurate gauge of the attitude of Americans toward individual television shows?

      I hate to break the news here to you, but there are huge demographic groups (especially college-age individuals who don't tend to have a permanent address) that often get missed by the Nielson ratings, and groups like African-Americans who are substantially over-represented with the rating points. This is not quite as simple as the amount of ticket sales that is used to compare motion pictures, but a weighted sampling system that throws a whole bunch of assumptions into the mix when the rating points are determined.

      This isn't to say that you can't judge relative gains or losses of audience share on the Nielson ratings, and they can be a rough point with decision making in regards to keeping or canceling a television show, but you need to understand the biases before you make those decisions. Networks have been substantially wrong in the past with the cancellation of some shows that simply shouldn't have been killed, because they didn't market their shows properly.

      And keep in mind foremost that the #1 thing that networks look at is not Nielsen ratings (which is useful), but how much they can get in terms of advertising revenue. If the price of the ads have to be lowered because they can't attract companies to run those ads on a particular TV show, this is the business deicsion that has to be made. The network evening news shows have had their ratings in the toilet for decades, but the ad revenue is still there for some reason to keep those shows on the air. And the networks are therefore able to continue to make a (perhaps modest) profit.

      Of course the real culprit here is not the ratings themselves, but those advertising agencies who make the decisions on what shows they are going to sponsor (and drive up the price of the ads for those shows), and which ones they decide to pull the ads from (with a corresponding drop in the price of ads on that show). That Nielsen ratings are are a factor in this decision is true, and in this case CBS made a financial decision based on what it could reasonably expect for income from Jericho vs. what it could potentially make off of even another mediocre television show that it is planning on putting in the place of Jericho next year.

      It all comes down to money in the long run.

  88. Jericho *was* Nuts by dutch13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thankfully, most of the folks fighting for Jericho are not quitters. Jericho is just a television show. Everyone watches television....we just want to watch something that entertains us. We don't want to be spoonfed crap reality tv. I am tired of seeing shows about doctors and lawyers banging each other. I am tired of watching 6 different versions of CSI or Law and Order. I pay for cable, I would like there to be something that makes you anticipate next week's episode.....without it being about who is banging who. Your grandparents grew up and were entertained by serial dramas on the radio......we just want a decent serial drama in our lives. Lost is fine.....but we liked JERICHO and we are fighting for it. If you are satisfied with bashing people on a website....great, more power to you. We, though, are joining together to try and achieve a change. Sit back and snipe from your computer.....or be a part of something. http://nutsonline.com/jericho

  89. Max Headroom predicted the future... by trimbo · · Score: 1

    24 hour news cycles. Cameras everywhere, ready to roll on a story. Cable TV. That show was more predictive than any futuristic/sci-fi serial I can think of off the top of my head.

    If you're up for a weekend of watching the present of news being predicted in the past, watch a bunch of Max Headroom followed by 1976's Network, an excellent, excellent movie.

  90. It could be your cause! by eecoxjr · · Score: 1

    I note quite a few folks don't get what it is all about. Let me say this: The effort to get Jericho renewed is about far more than just a show. It was just the trigger. If you don't like or appreciate Jericho, that is fine and is your right. Frankly I am glad we don't all have the same taste in things or the world might be rather boring. But consider this: What if it were your favorite show? What if you had strong convictions about the values (or lack of them) in a show that motivated you to watch it? What if a network mismeasured the fan base and arbitrarily canceled that show? If enough of you cared - would you do something about it - especially if you discerned a repeated bias of the network against the very programming you enjoyed? Many say "it's just a TV show". Well of course you are right. A number have indicated that the time spent in character development in the show was a waste of time (my summary of comments). For those that feel that way you probably would not enjoy reading a classic such as Les Miserables which spends hundreds of pages just giving background information on the characters. However, just as you have the right to not like a book (or a TV show) that does that, you should also respect that there are others who do enjoy such story development. So if it is just a show, why protest? Well, becasue we can. We do not have to accept big brother telling us what we would like to watch. In this case CBS themselves provided the social networking tools that hooked us in the first place and we are just using those same tools (and more) to provide the best customer feedback that we can. If it were your favorite show I would think and I would hope you might care enough to do the same. In the mean time, even if you do not agree with our taste in shows, I would hope you could appreicate the fact that we are not sitting back and just taking what big brother has to dish out. Next time it might be your show, or your rights taken away, or your (fill in your pet subject). I would be right there cheering you along!

    1. Re:It could be your cause! by HeshWasHere · · Score: 1

      So according to you... regardless of the fact that I thought they completely ruined a great premise. Regardless of the fact I though Jericho was just another sappy soap opera with the guise of being about post-apocolypse life. Regardless of the fact it centered around two people who didn't even live in Jericho as the big heroes. I'm supposed to encourage the network to keep cranking out these retarded series with great ideas gone bad for the sake of TV shows that I do enjoy??? Riiiiiight.

    2. Re:It could be your cause! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you don't have to JOIN a campaign, but you can appreciate what it is doing, aside from the show itself.
      This is about new media v old media. You don't like the show, fine... but you can still understand that CBS isn't understanding that Neilsons are outdated since they don't count DVR's, online sources, etc.

    3. Re:It could be your cause! by eecoxjr · · Score: 1

      Your tone indicates you think your opinion of the show should determine all others - is that what you mean? I'm saying that you are entitled to your opinion about the show, but there were on average 9 million (Nielsen measured) viewers who enjoyed it enough to stick with it and I doubt they would share your appraisal of it. Your opinion does not change what others think. There are other tastes besides yours that matter in the world. There are some who 30 years ago thought Star Wars was trash and a waste of time. Their opinions did not change what ultimately was judged to be a classic. Not all people enjoy classics because they take more time and effort than they are motivated to invest - their choice, their loss. Time and consensus will judge Jericho - not you.

    4. Re:It could be your cause! by HeshWasHere · · Score: 1

      It's the Jericho fans trying to change my opinion, not the other way around. I thought I was pretty straight forward, but let me go ahead and put it in "story" form to help you better understand. Kick your shoes off and enjoy. CBS makes a stupid show about bunnies. I hate bunnies. I like wolves. Only 9 million watched the dumb bunnies. (Nevermind that it was only 2 million in the 18-49 age range) CBS decides to cancel the Bunny Show, for good reason. The 9 million start knocking on my door, asking for help because, "Hey! One day they might cancel your show about Wolves! We're all in the same boat!". So me and all 30 million who hate bunnies decide, "Ya, that's a great idea, cause we love wolves!!" And we join in the protest pushing it to unbelievable levels. CBS see's this, and says, "Ooopsie!!! We must've really underestimated our fans! They LOVE bunnies!!! Let's bring it back!" And before you know it, every god damn show on every network is about bunnies. I like wolves. I hate bunnies. Get it?

    5. Re:It could be your cause! by eecoxjr · · Score: 1

      Yes, I get. You have a chip on your shoulder and to hell with everyone else. I think you've made that point very clear. Thanks for helping everyone understand the type of person who enjoys which type of show. That will be most helpful to everyone. Thank you! I could not have made a better argument myself, but you have made a living breathing example of it. CBS, I hope you read this - which type of viewer would you rather cultivate?

    6. Re:It could be your cause! by HeshWasHere · · Score: 1

      I enjoy Sopranos. My show is coming to an end too. I'm going to start a Sopranos campaign once it's over and get everyone to start mailing strippers to HBO in an attempt to bring it back. Instead of the "NUTS" compaign, I'll call it the "VAGI" campaign. We'll see how you feel when I invite you along for assistance.

    7. Re:It could be your cause! by eecoxjr · · Score: 1

      Yes, and my understanding is that the Sopranos has the advantage of being able to plan its own ending. It is being ended by design. I've not watched it but I understand it is a good show. If you wanted to launch an effort to keep it going, by all means do so. Your methods however might determine your outcome.

  91. Re:Hate Jericho fans? Why? by Teancum · · Score: 1

    While I will admit that Star Trek has inspired numerous engineers to not only enter the profession but to also try and come up with the some of the gee-whiz gadgets that they have seen on the show, I wouldn't give the show credit for all of the creature comforts that we enjoy today. Just as I wouldn't claim that NASA is responsible for spin-off technology like Velcro, Teflon, and integrated circuits. All were developed and even sold commercially prior to their use by NASA.

    One of the real issues with the original TV series of Star Trek was that the network was missing completely the demographic group of 18-40 year olds, who made up the bulk of the original Star Trek audience. It was a case of NBC (in the case of Star Trek) relying on lousy marketing information and a huge failure to market the advertising to those companies who perhaps would have even paid a premium rate for advertising on that particular television show. If the current Nielson rating system were in place in the late 1960's, Star Trek would have been the highest rated television show of the era and perhaps even of all time.

    Now the question in regards to Jericho is if this is also the case. I would argue that CBS isn't mis-managing the marketing of this particular television series, but that is a valid argument to make that would also make some sense to the executives of the entertainment division of CBS. The goal here is to convince the management of CBS that they should continue the series not because a bunch of nut cases that deserve long term mental health services have raised a stink about the cancellation, but because they are missing a golden opportunity to market their advertising to a group of companies they haven't considered before.

    If you can make this case, I promise you that you will see Jericho on the air next year. I just don't think that case can be made. Prove me wrong, please.

  92. Jericho vs. American Idol by Ranga14 · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I wonder which is going to win? I don't know if there's a show on Earth, especially serialized that can compete with the American Idol crazyness. CBS is just stupid for putting it up against that and expecting it to do very well. It still did pretty good considering that fact! Visit: http://www.savejericho.info/ for more!

    --
    Finish the Fight!
  93. This is why.. by LilWolf · · Score: 1

    ..I hate American TV and TV in general. You get a good story started that people love and then the channel cancels the show and the story is never finished(not saying this applies to Jericho, but in general).

    I suppose that's why I mostly watch anime. The shows rarely get canceled in the middle of a story so you get to enjoy it to the end. Of course, it helps that the shows are planned so that the story gets told fully instead of being dragged out season after season(exception apply). I wish more shows were done like that. "Here's the plot and here's how it'll end. We'll need 12 episodes to tell the story and that's it."

  94. Unfortunately by msimm · · Score: 1

    corporations can afford a lot of peanuts.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  95. On the other hand... by PPH · · Score: 1

    CBS is counting its blessings that the thread didn't include the expletive: "Bullsh*t!"

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  96. Sending nuts is a great idea by JaySSSS · · Score: 1

    Until someone considers it a terroristic threat because they are allergic to nuts. You know someone will twist it around...

  97. CBS probably cancelled the show in favor of by bitrex · · Score: 1

    Ghost Chimp, M.D.

  98. Re:Its not going to waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your entire comment does not have to be a two line long hyperlink.

    No, but why shouldn't it be? What exactly is your problem with a two line hyperlink?
  99. I like their devotion, come help Opie and Anthony by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    I invite them and everyone else to come and help fight for Opie and Anthony on XM satellite radio, where they were suspended for 30 days, and perhaps fired, for a homeless man saying he would fuck condy rice and beat her up. XM is a pay service much like HBO, whoever they decided to start censoring their "uncensored" radio service. XM sold everyone their service claiming uncensored radio, much like HBO sells uncensored television. XM is simply trying to make nice with the government so that their merger with Sirius satellite radio goes through. Which will result in a monopoly of the Satellite radio market.

    Opie and Anthony fans have canceled their subscriptions and advertisers have complained that XM is censoring content. XM is a pay service. People paid for the freedom of uncensored radio. XM lied. There are serious issues here at stake, even if you are not an Opie and Anthony Fan. Don Imus, and JV and Elvis were also fired for using free speech.

    Do anything you can... and start at http://www.peopleagainstcensorship.org/

    There is a serious mentality shift happening with reguard to what can and can not be said. I think we can all see that, whether its the content on the evening news which is nothing but teasers and scare tactics for ratings, or the lack of true public opinion on the television. Something needs to be done to stop this.

  100. From scattered nuts... by chriscoolc · · Score: 1

    The internet: bringing nuts together.

  101. What about... our lives and futures? by gosand · · Score: 1
    You know, at first I thought "it's just a TV show, what is the big deal?"

    Then I thought "Well, if people really want to take the time to protest for something they like, then good for them."

    Then I thought "You know, it is pretty sad that THIS is what people will protest about when our government is bankrupting the country, making enemies for us around the world, putting our fighting forces in harm's way for no good reason, and generally fucking up this country for not only this, but probably the next couple of generations."

    So to everyone who protests about your favorite TV show getting cancelled - fuck you.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  102. The Sad Truth of the Vote by chasisaac · · Score: 1

    Remember about 65M people, in a few hours, voted in American Idol as compared to the last election when 75M people voted, all day and longer.

    --
    -- A computer without Windoze is like a choclate cake without mustard
  103. CBS missed an opportunity... the fans didn't... by MisterCosmic · · Score: 1

    CBS pimped Jericho to the next generation of new media consumers... and guess what? It work! Trouble was, they had no idea how to harness that power... just like Xerox with the first GUI (which was sold to Apple for a song), they tried to grab a tiger by the tail, succeeded in spite of themselves, and had no idea how to hang on for the ride... NUTS to 'em, I say! In case anyone wants to know, in this case: CBS = "Critically Braindead Stumpjumpers"

  104. Obligatory by dapho · · Score: 1

    It's over 9,000!

  105. New Media vs Old Ratings System by AphroditeJolen · · Score: 1

    Regardless of how you feel about this show, you have to admit that technology has redefined the television experience in a way that is innovative and exciting and a welcome alternative to the mind-numbing reality television that has infiltrated the rest of society. Jericho was designed to give viewers options in a multi-media experience, providing episodes at scheduled times, as well as via TiVO, DVRs, On-Demand, and online. I expect that each of these venues are affiliated with their own means of revenue production. I suggest that the outdate ratings system used to make the decision to cancel has been unable to keep up with the times and is therefore starkly unrepresentative of the profit value of a show such as Jericho. I personally have donated money towards nuts and hope for a second season, but in the end, this will be an interesting case study in how the old guard chooses to respond to the digital revolution for all to watch.

  106. Unfortunately Its a (Very Sad) Sign of Our Time by Cappadonna · · Score: 1

    Wow, its as if Mike Judge's Idiocracy is quickly coming to life. Reminds of the Hal Jordan fans back when I was in high school. Even at that age, I realize getting worked up over a comic book character but not knowing who your city councilman was or what the Bill Rights is shows just has screwed up we are as a nation.

    How many people know more about Rosie O'Donnell going bat shit in the View on Elisabeth Hasselbeck than what they were actually talking about. We just had an article about how some idiots in Kansas are opening a creationist museum.

    We're dealing with a nation of slack-jawed, loudmouth twits who are going nuts (pardon the pun) over a TV show but don't seem to bat an eye that working class survivors of Katrina are still effectively homeless.

    May God Have Mercy on TV-hypontized, junk food gouring souls -

    Cappa

  107. That's why by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    I quit watching new shows.

    I'll wait for the season stuff to come out for a few years, before I get into the show. Sci-Fi channel and Fox were particularly bad in Launching GREAT new shows and concepts - only to trash them for something cheaper, or dumb.

    Tick, The lone gunman, Firefly ...

    What do we get in return? Wrestling.

    Professional twits in costumes fake wrestling on the sci-fi channel... //weeps

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  108. Jericho Needs a Season Two by techdude550 · · Score: 1

    I feel that a season two (at least) is needed for Jericho. I have been a loyal viewer since day one. This show has brought people together like no other and may very well change the way television ratings work. So far the fans have spent almost $40,000 to save this show! NUTS!

  109. Ahh, so THAT'S why! by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    "'Jericho' Fans Send Over Nine Tons of Nuts to CBS..."

    That certainly explains why the Halls of Congress suddenly turned up empty...

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  110. Crohn's and VSL#3 by loosestones · · Score: 1

    Noticed you have Crohns. Wife has it too, runs in her family so I can relate to a lot of what you are saying. We also live in Canada, Saskatchewan the home of Canadian Medicare. Our province has good universal hospital coverage and a provincial drug plan, but some years our costs can balloon. On my wife's last attack she was off work for over a year. She was taking the usual prescribed drugs (steroids/anti-rejection) to get it under control with minimal success ... the specialist started talking surgery.

    Her GP suggested she try a "food supplement" called VSL#3, a pro-biotic by Seafood pharmaceuticals (888-292-3193). The GP noted that there were some interesting studies showing good short and long term control of crohns in over 75% of the test subjects. First week she took two packages a day then went to 1 package a day. Within 2 weeks she was back to "normal" - or as normal as you can get with crohns. She has not had a major attack for over two years. When she gets "the feeling" something is wrong, she doubles her intake for a few days and blands down her diet.

    I normally do not believe in the health food cure all VOODOO stuff. My wife had tried other pro-biotics with no effect, but the VSL#3 is different. I saw the change within days with my own eyes, this stuff is amazing. I have been passing this information along to others, and many of them have seen dramatic improvements. The GP and my wife have worked together to removed her off the drugs and she now take just 1 package of VSL#3 a day. At about $3.00 a day it a small price for good health! The downside is the entire cost is yours, no tax deductions or provincial drug assistance as it is considered a "food supplement".

    The majority of studies seem to indicate some benefit. I only have two bookmarks on VSL#3, they are:
          http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00367705 (makes reference to an adult test)
          http://www.crohns.net/Miva/education/ddw2002.shtml (general commentary)
    If you look around I am sure you will find some additional reference material.

    1. Re:Crohn's and VSL#3 by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      I just saw this now! Thank you for this information. I'm in the middle of a major flare that's been going on for six months and I can't seem to get it under control no matter what I do.

      I will definitely get my hands on some of this and hope that it helps.
      Again, thanks for relaying this to me, and best to your wife and her health. Also, it is great to hear from supportive spouses of people with this disease; I can imagine it must take a lot of patience and understanding to live with someone with this condition, and it's excellent to see that there are kind and caring people out there who are willing to do so.

  111. The Buffy facts by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    Buffy was in no way axed by WB.

    UPN desperately wanted it as a "flagship" prestige show, and just outbid WB when the contract was up after 5 seasons. WB offered a lot more than it had paid for S1-5, but ultimately wasn't prepared to take as big a loss on it as UPN.

    How much effect the network switch had on the quality I don't know. My guess is it was very little.

  112. No, it's a cunning ploy... by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1
    You see, the wholesaler the nuts are purchased from is a subisidiary of a company owned by CBS. It's really the same bags of nuts going around and around, extracting funds from the campaign and making CBS and the campaign's organisers (who are secretly employed by CBS) rich in the process. You can expect to see more of this kind of thing in the future, as increasingly cynical media companies realise that they can make more money milking public indignation than they can making content. When the boxes start to get a little ratty and look like they won't survive a few more truck trips, they're donated to charity - having already been paid for a dozen times over by concerned sheeple who jumped on a bandwagon because their favourite waste-of-spectrum got cancelled.

    Now, I've got a REAL grassroots annoyance campaign - to bring Firefly back. It involves sending a herd of cattle to Fox headquarters every day until they relent and give Joss a huge bucket of money. I can promise that I'm not on Fox's payroll - Rupert hired me direc... no, don't type that. No, stop typing, or I'll get a new secretary. Don't you DARE click "Submit", or you're fired

  113. This is sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    CBS cancels a TV show and fans campaign to send over $30,000 of nuts to those in charge. The President of the United States of America suspends habeas corpus and nobody cares. Anyone else think our society has its priorities mixed up?

  114. regardless of you thoughts on the show... by bgingras · · Score: 1

    Regardless of whether or not you believe the show should be kept, or if you thought it was good or bad, this campaign is about something greater...it's standing up and telling the major networks that the viewers will not be silenced. We have been treated like lemmings, they assume we will follow whatever they put in front of us...they think they can tell us what to think and what to watch...it's time we tell them what we think and tell them what we will watch...this is what it's about. It started as a few fans wanting their show back, it's now one of the biggest stories on the net...it's a snowball rolling down hill about to become an avalanche that will bury CBS in NUTS!!!! We will be silenced, we will not back down, we will not go quietly into the night...we make our stand here and NOW NUTS to CBS

  115. Misunderstood headline by volpe · · Score: 1

    Send Over Nine Tons of Nuts to CBS

    For a minute there I thought they packaged up the entire Westboro Baptist Church.

  116. Jericho-critique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started watching Jericho from the beginning, and I though the story was good. Unfortunately the show was rather corny and melodramatic and gave too much screen time to the wrong events. I mean, the episode is only about 45 minutes, and there was just a nuclear attack, and they spend 10 minutes on some some little girl's field tracheotomy?... Thanks for the absolute fluff. Some of us do not watch TV to be escorted from one emotionally-charged-yet-meaningless vignette to the next. How about advancing the plot? It felt like they were throwing in tear-jerker and romantic stuff just to make sure the female watchers were staying tuned in. Look, it's OK to make a show that doesn't appeal to everyone. But apparently the networks just think every show today should be a panacea of entertainment for all audiences.

    Jericho also suffers from Jack Bauer syndrome. But it's the mayor and his son this time. They are the heroes, everyone must bow to them, they know all and only they are competetent enough to make decisions, save lives, and serve breakfast. Crisis? Move out the way, here comes the fucking mayor, he'll save the day. Yay mayor! Please.... did Rudy Giuliani bankroll the show or something?

  117. It's "a historical" by Tina+Russell · · Score: 1

    A if you hear the h, an if you don't, arrgggghhhhhh...