Slashdot Mirror


User: camisade

camisade's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3

  1. Re:I want a... on Nanotech or Nano-Not? · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the best books of all sci-fi-dom, IMO. I too wish my daughter could have something like this. As it is, she's gonna have to get by with me, and the adventure games I'm sure she'll grow up being very familiar with.

  2. BPL when there's no P? on Cincinnati Gets Broadband Over Power Lines · · Score: 1

    With DSL, if you have a UPS, you may keep your connection if the power goes out--phone lines, in many areas (mine, anyway, no matter where I've lived) often operate during power outages. What happens to BPL if power goes out? If you have a UPS, can you still remain connected?

  3. Laws don't kill spam. People kill spam on Congress Sends Anti-Spam Bill To White House · · Score: 1

    The legislature will not solve this problem. The system will not be re-architected or overhauled to defend against this onslaught any time soon. Changing or attacking the business model that supports spam is unlikely to be an achievable goal for such a worldwide pheonomena.

    The best thing you can do is to help educate people to cease being profitable targets for spammers, and help them setup the defense that, like any other computer-security approach is layered and simple enough to use to be effective.

    For me, that's POPFile and Outlook 2003 (gasp--yep, plain old MS Outlook).

    POPFile, for me is 99.54% accurate for my work email addresses and 99.18% accurate for my personal email address--both of which, interestingly enough, suffer from about 24% of all received email being spam.

    Cooly enough, of the the fraction of a percent of spam that DOES get through POPFile, Outlook 2003 identifies about 90%. As a result, in the last week, despite receiving on the order of 200+ spam emails a day (I have email addresses I've used for almost ten years), I've only had 4-5 actually make it past POPFile and outlook 2003 into my in-box. And with Outlook 2003's properties that prevents me from loading embedded HTML images from senders I have not explicitly approved, my looking at THOSE "surviving" spam did not signal to the spammers that their message was ever viewed by anyone.

    Your mileage may vary, but for me it's about as good as it gets.

    I paid to register Postal Inspector / Spam Inspector...but instead I now use POPFile, which is free (donorware) and open source. (The Outlook choice is a business necessity).

    -Camisade