Slashdot Mirror


Cincinnati Gets Broadband Over Power Lines

kotj.mf writes "According to the Cincinnati Enquirer, Cincinnati-area electric utility Cinergy has become the first electric utility in the country to offer broadband over power lines. There's also a press release. At $29.95/month for 1 Mb/s both upstream and down, it's only a few bucks more than the local dialup providers. Can we expect the power companies to start giving Cable and DSL providers a run for their money? Finally, my town gets AHEAD of the times, for once."

609 comments

  1. And in other news... by SargeZT · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cincinatti is famous for something other than WKRP.

    --
    And why did you staple the trout to the RAM?
    1. Re:And in other news... by UpLateDrinkingCoffee · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that Jerry Springer was mayor of Cincinatti. Wonder if he had anything to do with this?

    2. Re:And in other news... by System.out.println() · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What's WKRP? :P

    3. Re:And in other news... by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cincinatti is famous for something other than WKRP.

      Uh, putting chili on spaghetti?

      Having a city park graced by golden statues of winged pigs?

      Having each of the following: a first rate art museum, a first rate botanical garden, and a first rate zoo?

      I've only been there a few times, but seemed like a pretty cool place to me, even from my jaded coastal geek perspective.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:And in other news... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 0, Troll

      I believe he mentioned the phrase 'famous for.' Famous. Look it up. :)

    5. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what a great name for an energy company. What do they think they are, a dot-com company?

    6. Re:And in other news... by El · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cincinatti is famous for something other than WKRP. And that would be what? Having their municpal airport located in another state?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    7. Re:And in other news... by SargeZT · · Score: 0, Informative

      WKRP in cincinatttttiiiiiii! Old TV show. Had some guy named venus flytrap. And some lameass 80's nerd. Like, chester, lester, something like that. Oh, and there was a black guy, he was awesome.

      --
      And why did you staple the trout to the RAM?
    8. Re:And in other news... by scorpioX · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Apparently you were born after 1982 or so. Think 10 to 14 year olds (at that time) and Lonnie Anderson on the TV. Ahh, the good old days.

      WKRP on the Web

    9. Re:And in other news... by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 5, Funny


      If they could deliver spaghetti chili via power lines, then I'd be impressed! Broadband is so passe.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    10. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KRAP

    11. Re:And in other news... by catbutt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agree, but given the unlikelihood of that happening, here is a guy who makes a good skyline chili knockoff and it's dirt cheap (vs. $5 a can for real skyline sent mail order). It's spices only, you have to add meat and tomato sauce but its real easy to make.

    12. Re:And in other news... by El · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. Most of us geek were hot for Bailey instead! And by the way, it's "Loni" not "Lonnie". Lonnie is a guy's name (in fact, it's my boss' name. And no, I don't wish Loni was my boss instead).

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    13. Re:And in other news... by MajorDick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You forgot Jerry Springer, the Ex-Mayor Now Television Dude, who was busted paying for hookers with the city checkbook:)

      OH and that when people there dont understand you they say "Please ?" instead of "Excuse Me ?" or "Im sorry what was that ?" This always leads too all kinds of fun conversations the first time you visit.

    14. Re:And in other news... by budgenator · · Score: 0, Troll

      Cincinatti is famous for,

      The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (I think)
      The first electric traffic signal and of course the first traffic ticket for dis-obeying an electric trafic signal.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    15. Re:And in other news... by hey! · · Score: 1

      You forgot Jerry Springer, the Ex-Mayor Now Television Dude, who was busted paying for hookers with the city checkbook:)

      Hookers in Cincinnati take checks?

      How quaint.

      What next -- electronic micropayments?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    16. Re:And in other news... by catbutt · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was a personal check, not a city check. Dumb, but not quite as dumb. This was before he was mayor, he was only a councilman, so I guess it didn't hurt him too bad.

      And yeah, the "please" thing confused me for the first few weeks of college (at UC). The other things were, they say "sweep" rather than "vacuum", and they leave out "to be", for instance, "the carpet needs swept".

    17. Re:And in other news... by chez69 · · Score: 1

      the rock and roll hall of fame is in Cleveland.

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
    18. Re:And in other news... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      You forgot The Beast!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    19. Re:And in other news... by antic · · Score: 5, Funny


      Micropayments for hookers?

      Dude, speak for yourself...

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    20. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Still quite dumb. He broke at least 3 of the unwritten rules of politics.

      1) Don't use hookers while holding office.
      2) If breaking rule 1, don't use a check.
      3) If breaking rule 2, make sure the check won't bounce. (That's how he got caught.)

    21. Re:And in other news... by glorinc · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a transplant who's lived in Cincy for the past 4 years, I can tell you that Skyline / Goldstar is in no way chili. Really it's more of a glorified spaghetti sauce -- thin, runny, and overly sweet (Did you know they put cinnamon and chocolate in there?). But the natives suck that stuff down like there's no tomorrow. Yuck.

    22. Re:And in other news... by fishnuts · · Score: 1

      ah, loni anderson.

      countless minutes of my life lost into a sock, watching her on that show. She's one of those hotties that -should- have done playboy before getting old.

      anyway, BPL is evil. just as evil as IP over carrier pigeon. They both have dirty side effects.

    23. Re:And in other news... by slasher999 · · Score: 1

      > KRAP

      That was MAD Magazine's parady of the show. The comic was called "WKRAP in Cincinati". Funny stuff as I recall, but I was probably only 10 or 12 at the time.

    24. Re:And in other news... by slasher999 · · Score: 1

      > Having a city park graced by golden statues of
      > winged pigs?

      You well heeled big wheel...

    25. Re:And in other news... by Radioheadhead · · Score: 1

      ha ha, charade you are
      (you say 'charade,' and I say 'shurrahd' ...)

    26. Re:And in other news... by dirk · · Score: 1

      Hey now that isn't fair!

      We also have a crappy baseball team and a football team that is so far beyond crappy I don't know how to describe it. We are also famous for prosecuting a museum for showing art (Robert Maplethorp), being lame enough to relish in the fact he have the world's largest chicken dance, and a thriving race war going on. Add in our deserted downtown and police who love to kill minorities, and I would say you have named all the things we're infamous for.

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    27. Re:And in other news... by neelm · · Score: 1

      mmmmm... gold star 5-way....

    28. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      WKRP was actually in Dallas Georgia ...

    29. Re:And in other news... by mikeboone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cincinnati had a large Germanic population in the early years. This use of 'please' comes from the German word 'bitte' which can mean please in the usual sense but also the 'come again?' sense.

    30. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the race riots!

    31. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could stop being a backwards-minded redneck fundie neanderthal and joined the enlightened by laying off the dead animals.

    32. Re:And in other news... by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Not sure about the chocolate, but I put cinnamon in my chili all the time. Excellant stuff.

      The skyline chili is much too watery for me (especially if you buy it in the store - it's terrible). My mom is from Cincinnati and we had chili spagehtti a lot growing up. She made it with "Van Camp's Chili w/o beans" which was excellant for it. Alas, they don't make that any more :( She's tried lots of other things, but it just doesn't work.

      Anyway, basically you need some chili beef seasoned up a bit...it's not quite like just taking the winner of the chili cookoff, putting it on spaghetti and adding cheese. It is it's own unique kind of chili.

      Actually, I've come to like the variation that Steak and Shake sells. Not quite the same, but as the closest skyline I know of is 9 hours away, it'll have to do.

      I do know that if people didn't grow up around the concept of chili spaghetti, their immediate reaction is always one of WTF!

    33. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget prosecuting Larry Flynt, the Maplethorp controversy, UC Bearcat basketball, "The Jungle", Pete Rose, The "Big Red Machine", etc...

    34. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...what's up with the prosecution of robert maplethorpe's pictures?

      I mean, is anybody shocked by a picture of a man's penis in 2004?

      Half the population has one, and the other half has already seen one. I think this is a weird world we live in.

    35. Re:And in other news... by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sorry to break it to you, Herb. The lovely Jennifer is actually a transsexual.

    36. Re:And in other news... by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      Loni is still sooo much sexier than Pam...

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    37. Re:And in other news... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Uh, putting chili on spaghetti?
      > Having a city park graced by golden statues of winged pigs?
      > Having each of the following: a first rate art museum, a first rate
      > botanical garden, and a first rate zoo?

      Despite being from Ohio, the only one of these things I was aware of is the
      zoo. (It _is_ a quite good zoo, though. The only other decent zoo in the
      state is the Cleveland Metroparks one, but the Cinci zoo is better. The
      bug building is particularly interesting; most zoos don't have that.)

      I thought the major thing Cincinatti was known for is one of the long-term
      losingest teams in football. But I'm not really a sports geek, so perhaps
      I'm getting it confused with another city?

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    38. Re:And in other news... by jonadab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > they say "sweep" rather than "vacuum"

      Sweep is the more general verb that applies whether you're using a vacuum,
      a broom, or whatever. (But not a wet-mop; then you'd be mopping.) It's
      easier to say and to spell than "vacuum", so it tends to be used somewhat
      more often in most of the midwestern US (at least). "Sweep" (and "sweeper"
      for the equipment) is definitely more common than "vacuum" throughout most
      of Ohio, northern Indiana, and western Michigan; I'm not sure how far beyond
      those areas this usage extends, but it's definitely not particular to just
      Cincinnati.

      > and they leave out "to be", for instance, "the carpet needs swept".

      I don't think that's an ellision of an infinitive; I think it's rather a use
      of the past participial form as a predicate adjective. Some places prefer to
      use the present participial form ("the carpet needs sweeping" -- this seems
      to be particularly prominent in the UK), but in most of Ohio (at least) the
      past participial form is more common in this construct.

      If it were an elided infinitive, one would expect to see infinitives elided
      in other circumstances (e.g., infinitives of completion), but the construction
      in question always seems to occur with linking verbs. So I think it's a
      participle used as a predicate adjective. If you can think of a verb whose
      past participial form differs in pronunciation from its infinitive form, I'll
      try out the sound of that verb's forms in this construct and let you know
      which one sounds "right" to my ear. (I've lived in Ohio long enough (and in
      enough different parts of Ohio) to know that Bucyrus is pronounced with one
      syllable and Mohican with two, that "Ohio" doesn't have any long O sounds in
      it, what a sammich is, and what you get when you put a red wig on ET[1].
      I've also lived in Indiana and Michigan enough to know what's peculiar to
      Ohio and what's not.)

      [1] Dorothy Fuldheim

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    39. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having their municpal airport located in another state?

      Having had my birthplace torn down last year due to runway construction at Cincinnati's airport, I have a general idea of why it's in Kentucky and not in Ohio.

      During World War 2, bomber pilot recruits in the Cincinnati area needed training facilities, and a clsoe, flat, sparsely populated area in Boone County proved ideal. Cows don't count as friendly fire if they get water-filled practice bombs dumped on them, so who cared?

      This practice field was converted to a civil airfield after the war and was chosen for the main airport site in the Greater Cincinnati area. (The other, Lunken Airfield, is too small for transcontinental flights, and tends to get slightly submerged when the Ohio River floods.)

      Now, Boone County has doubled in population to almost 100,000 people in only 20 years, creating a massive strain on space and infrastructure. The airport has no easy way to expand, so it rips down peoples' houses and pays them undervalued prices in compensation (since demand for houses has jacked up prices).

    40. Re:And in other news... by Basehart · · Score: 1

      For anyone not familiar with Cincinnati, Skyline is a chain of restaurants.

    41. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lived in Cincy all my life and never heard 'sweep' used in place of vacuum. Weird.

    42. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cincinnati chili . . . mmm. food of the gods.

    43. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is Dr. Conway and so am I, so what are you implying?

    44. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always use "to be" in my sentances. I also need to state that the whole "Please?" "Excuse?" me thing is even annoying for locals.

      Cincinnati was also the first major city in the US to deploy consumer level DSL service to its customers. Then another interesting thing, the pricing is kind of different/better than the article states, I for one, receive 3Mbs downstream and 1.5Mbs upstream through Cincinnati Bell at the cost of $41.95/mo.

      Not only is this ONE good thing to come out of Cincinnati yestarday, but that racist fat bitch Marge Schott (former owner of the Reds) has joined that klan rally in the sky.

      Rokken Like Dokken eh?

    45. Re:And in other news... by muggsy · · Score: 1

      I was in a store in San Diego and said "please" when I wanted someone to repeat something. The guy in line behind me asked if I was from Cincy.Turns out he was also from Cincy.

    46. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a PA-dutchism too. "The corn needs shucked." In Lancaster people also add "awhile" after everything. "I'm going to start the car 'awhile.'" "I going outside 'awhile.'"

    47. Re:And in other news... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Famous for Drew Carey too.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    48. Re:And in other news... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "You radiate cold shafts of broken glass"

      Man..what a great tune. I gotta throw that on here in a bit....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    49. Re:And in other news... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      No, those of us in Michigan hold the football record now. I'm ashamed of it, and I'm in Muskegon, the opposite side of the state from Detroit.

    50. Re:And in other news... by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1
      And of course the late Marge Schott, who at the time she owned the Cincinnati Reds (baseball, for non-US readers), was the most inflammatory figure in professional sports. She passed away yesterday, and I haven't seen too many positive tributes to her.

      As for 'cool place', yes there was old money (see Marge ref.) which built some of its better features, but much of that is long gone now. Good ol' Cinci... not.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    51. Re:And in other news... by lamp540 · · Score: 0

      wow, people in cincinatti sound retarded.

    52. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...setting the Ohio River on fire.

      Yeah, sounds like a GREAT place to me.

    53. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yes, eating twigs and leaves is much more enjoyable.

      I'd love to stay and discuss more, but I've got to scout over to Mickey D's for a couple QPC's.

    54. Re:And in other news... by notbob · · Score: 0

      You musta hit your head this morning.

      This place sucks royal nuts.

      Our women... they're like cattle.. no seriously they're both fat, slobbering, and stupid as a general concept. We're fat as f* here.

      There's the classic east vs west thing here, richies vs roman catholic lower middle class down home kind of people. Then in the middle we have all the nogs, thankfully we have plenty of white cops to contain the situation, but driving through police lines on the way home from work was kind of annoying.

      There are some cool things about this town... Newport on the Levy.. wait thats across the river..., frisbee golf courses... a couple, playhouse in the park (arnoff center bites), the botanical gardens (great to take a date to that likes plants ;P), Chili of course.

      Salaries here are deflated, cost of living is on the rise, I know in the last 2 years I've either had pay cuts or stayed the same consistently, and seen my bills go up up and well up. In my tiny ass condo, an average electric bill is now $153/mo, where it was at most $90/mo 2 years ago, cable that I get for $130/mo cause I'm locked in my plan to change at all bumps me to $150/mo. Might not seem like a lot but thats $70/mo = $840/yr, I'm making $8.5k/yr less then I did 2.5 years ago. So yeah shit here bites.

      Oh and the biggest thing that sucks in cincy: the weather!!! It's irradic as all hell.

    55. Re:And in other news... by portforward · · Score: 1

      Um, and what about New York City having its football stadium in another State? Go East Rutherford New Jersey Jets!!

    56. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you are saying then is that you would prefer the days of dial up and slow speeds and scattered content to the current high speed services that most of us enjoy. Back to the stone ages. Lets get rid of computers and go back to the abacus. Passe? I think not. Let's try to be a little constructive with the bull5h17!

    57. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sinner!

      Skyline four-way with onions dry, weak iced tea and oyster crackers.. PRONTO!

    58. Re:And in other news... by blakjack · · Score: 1

      Cincinatti is famous for something other than WKRP.
      When I think of Cincinatti all that pops in my mind is "The Devil's Backbone" from Airborne.

    59. Re:And in other news... by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      As a native put it to me, it's "Cincinnati chili", not "chili chili". If you go in thinking you're getting old fashioned cowboy Texas chili, you're in for a suprise. :)

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    60. Re:And in other news... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I woke up in the middle of the night and thought, "gee I think should have been Cleveland"

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    61. Re:And in other news... by WarForge · · Score: 0

      for one, receive 3Mbs downstream and 1.5Mbs upstream through Cincinnati Bell at the cost of $41.95/mo.

      Since when is the upload 1.5Mbps? I just had my Zoomtown upgraded as part of their new program and the speed was listed as 3Mbps/768Kbps? If you are getting 1.5Mbps down, I want to know as I will have a bone to pick with CB!

    62. Re:And in other news... by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      Cincinatti is famous for something other than WKRP.

      Well they have to be famous for something else now. WKRP went off the air due to the interference produced by the BPL providers ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    63. Re:And in other news... by Tombstone-f · · Score: 1

      Uh, putting chili on spaghetti?

      Thanks a lot, now I have to go to Hard Times tonight.

    64. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one positive thing... reportedly she left around 200 million dollars to the Cincinnati Zoo and two local homeless shelters rather than her family... i thought that was cool.

    65. Re:And in other news... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      Only that I'm busy on Saturday night.

    66. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Cleveland (Parma, actually) is where Drew Carey hails from.

    67. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WKRP went off the air due to the interference produced by the BPL providers

      ...it was due to the phone cops

  2. What's so special about this? by Fiona+Winger · · Score: 1, Troll

    I don't see anything that great about this change. Am I missing something? Is this like changing to electric powered cars?

    1. Re:What's so special about this? by binaryDigit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Am I missing something?

      Indeed, a fairly high bandwidth pipe utilizing existing infrastructure. What's not "special"? The only line going into someones house that's more pervasive than the phone line are power lines. And no mention of dsl's distance woes. Big news indeed. If it comes here, I'm all over this.

    2. Re:What's so special about this? by rodgster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about symmetrical data rates?

      How about less than either cable or DSL pricing?

      How about available anywhere you have power (which computers usually need to operate)?

      As soon as it's available in my AO, I'll be jumping ship from my current provider.

      How about RTFA?

      --
      Who will guard the guards?
    3. Re:What's so special about this? by vrtladept · · Score: 1

      I think it would be a great deal. Image getting rid of cable/DSL and telephone lines.

      Switch to something like Vonage (or other VoIP carrier) if you really need a land-line or just user your cell phone.

      $29.95 for 1Mbps (both ways!) that's right, fast peer-to-peer uploads and you could run 10 VoIP lines easily if you wanted to. All at the same time surfing the net. Sign Me up!

    4. Re:What's so special about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      If it comes here, I'm all over this.

      What??!! How can you say that?! Don't you know that it interferes with amateur radio? Don't you also realize that ham radio is The One True Geek Passtime? You're not allowed to support something that would cause interference to amateur radio operators. Report to Room 12 for re-education.

    5. Re:What's so special about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It interferes with more than amateur radio operators... meh

      Think of a giant unshielded antenna that spans hundreds or thousands of miles. yee-haw

      Dumb-ass power companies trying to make a buck.

    6. Re:What's so special about this? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hellz yea! Man what I wouldn't give to get out form under the iron boot of my damn ISP. Yea, I get 3 mbs down, but only like .2 up, and I NEEEEEED that upload bandwidth!!!

      I think it'll be good just for the extra competition to drive down the prices.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    7. Re:What's so special about this? by excaliber19 · · Score: 1

      Bah! Now we can have our toasters connected to the internet! Now Wonderbread can collect data on how we toast our bread (as this is very important. A perfectly toasted bread is a work of art, a fine balance of ingredients making up the bread, and the correct settings of the toaster. If, for instance, the toaster heating coils react negatively with the main wonderbread ingredient, the work of art would be ruined), and how many times a day we eat bread (err, toast)

    8. Re:What's so special about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I don't see how the grandparent could have "missed" anything considering this is the third dupe about broadband over powerlines to be posted to the front page.

    9. Re:What's so special about this? by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      If we can have 1Mbps up/down to the Internet anywhere there's a power jack in the entire US, I personally think that's worth sacrificing a part of the wireless spectrum. If it stomps all over amateur radio operators, that's too bad, but universal broadband Internet access is much higher on my list of things that matter. If this technology can bring broadband to the places that aren't served by cable or DSL, then it's a great thing. If this alleged interference caused problems with anything that really mattered, the FCC would be all over it. You guys are whining over nothing.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    10. Re:What's so special about this? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No joke. Right now most of the US has either no broadband, or a monopoly situation. This can bring a monopoly situation to the people currently on dialup, and competition to the people who are currently utilizing a monopoly. (I can't get DSL where I am, and satellite has too much latency for gaming, which is a major reason I have broadband.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:What's so special about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means that COMCAST and and the Baby Bells cannot afford to "GOUGE" and Rape their customers any longer for a pittance of bandwidth

    12. Re:What's so special about this? by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only line going into someones house that's more pervasive than the phone line are power lines

      Not true: Telephone service goes to 92.1% of U.S. households. Plumbing goes to
      >99% of U.S. households.

      Not that I'm proposing IP-over-water-pipes or anything...

    13. Re:What's so special about this? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You should read my post in the responses to the last time this was brought up. Regardless of what's using the spectrum that BPL interferes with, the fact that BPL does not in any way require or benefit from skywave propagation/ionospheric propagation and stomps all over the -only- frequency range that is pysically capable of bouncing off the atmosphere is a complete and utter waste. Not to mention that amateur radio provides long distance communications not only to third world countries, but more importantly in the event of a natural disaster. Ham radio operators are constantly pushing the limits of communications technology, what do you think the designers that work at the big communications companies do when they go home? Where do you think the communications buffs who join the big communications firms come from? Anyway, its a waste, and it tramples a service to the world that is without a doubt one of the most important ones when it comes to saving your life the next time you're stuck in a collapsed building like at the WTC towers.

    14. Re:What's so special about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true.

      I canceled my cable long ago (Comcast is way too expensive). The only reason I have a phone line is so that I can get DSL. I done even have a phone plugged in. My cell actualy leaves the house with me.. no missed calls because I went downtown, or to a friends house, or to work...

    15. Re:What's so special about this? by super+awesome · · Score: 2, Funny

      jumping ship from your current provider, to ...a current provider

      --

      m y k a r m a i s m o r e p o s i t i v e t h a n y o u r s.
    16. Re:What's so special about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see anything that great about this change. Am I missing something? Is this like changing to electric powered cars?

      Actually, not quite, but you're leaning in the direction of the respect this should get.

      Broadband over powerlines, if you think about it, is kinda hard to pull off. First of all, you've got a massive amount of AC juice running through the power grid. I'm no expert, but it seems like that kind of wild, free flowing power would be hard to harness for binary communications. At the very least it seems like the AC would cause latency, which would need to be compensated for by extra error checking and redundancy.

      Then there's the problem of getting your signal past transformers. When they first tried BPL, when the signal would hit the first transformer it would be like hitting a black hole. I wasn't too sure how (or if) they were gonna get around that with the existing infrastructure.

      Pretty fucking cool, I say.

    17. Re:What's so special about this? by Woody77 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Obviously you know absolutely nothing of how large scale emergencies are handled, with respect to communication.

      ARES, Amature Radio Emergency Services, steps up with the communications infrastructure is gone, due a disaster, natural or man-made.

      Basically, a bunch of well-trained hams setup radio stations and manage the creation of an ad-hoc radio communications infrastructure when the main one goes down.

      The World Trade Center had communcations by end of day, or end of the next day due to ARES going into motion and getting base-stations setup, probably all running on generators, so that those on-site trying to find survivors could communicate with each other and the outside world.

      Now, with BPL, while you're trying to get this setup (becase the land-lines are gone, and the cell system is a laughingstock that's overran by people trying to call home), you've got the powerlines all radiating a ton of crap out in the airwaves. This is probably people trying to use their internet connection, even though the power's out, and they've got their generator running (those of us in certain more rural areas pretty much are required to own one to stay funcitonal).

      All that background noise just makes it that much harder to communciate.

    18. Re:What's so special about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually there was an acticle about this a few months ago, some company built robots designed to navigate the sewage pipes, dragging/blowing fiber thru them to build a city-wide network

    19. Re:What's so special about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Not that I'm proposing IP-over-water-pipes or anything...

      Hate to see that DoS attack.

    20. Re:What's so special about this? by jlaxson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I love it when people post like this. BPL radiates hundreds of watts on spectrum used for worldwide communication. Hams use this same spectrum for that very communication. It doesn't matter if you're in a third world country or New York, any BPL system will junk the entire world's spectrum.

      But that's not what's fun about this post. It has been shown that as little as 1 watt on an amateur frequency will knock out or severely degrade BPL in a 4 block radius. Hams can, and many do, transmit as many as 1500 watts. No 1mbps in my neighborhood.

      --
      On Apple Input Peripherals: They're okay, I guess, but I was really hoping for a one-key keyboard and a 109-button mouse
    21. Re:What's so special about this? by isaac · · Score: 1
      Not that I'm proposing IP-over-water-pipes or anything...

      Lord no! The plumbing in my building sucks. Overflows and dropped packets all over the place.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    22. Re:What's so special about this? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      While 1500 watts is the limit on much of the ham allocated spectrum, the rules require using the minimum to get the job done. Granted, with BPL being not licensed for broadcast, hams remain the primary and using more wattage would be merited, the signal quality on the receiving side would still be degraded substantially or lost altogether in the mess, not to mention the increased radiation and safety hazards operating above 150 watts. Once you get to a certain average power, there is a process that needs to occur to ensure safety, and regulating transmitting time needs to occur to keep within MPE levels (Maximum Permissible Exposure). If all hams had to bump to 1500 watts, there would be a lot more problems than just a few people occasionally using that much power for a specific need. When an antenna is close to another antenna, especially when the distance between antennas is less than the wavelength, massive interference will occur almost regardless of the receiving frequency and transmitting frequency. Now hopefully the lobbyists of the industry will not get BPL designated primary, because then the hams would be interfering and it would essentially put a stop to ham. For now, we have to hope that regular communications use will stop BPL and not the other way around. If BPL gains popularity, the majority, which does not know about communications, will get the designation changed eventually one way or another.

    23. Re:What's so special about this? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that without ham radio nobody would have noticed the towers had colapsed?

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    24. Re:What's so special about this? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      I think you are reading far more into it, and I'm not sure where you get that. I simply said that hams' communications assistance was needed during 9/11. I didnt want to repost my whole post from the last time this was brought up. Mostly I meant that the communications provided by hams helped find people under rubble and get help to them. It also helped injured people who escaped the building and had smoke inhalation problems or other ailments. Please don't try and force words in my mouth.

    25. Re:What's so special about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ham radio is probably how the terrorists communicated with each other.

    26. Re:What's so special about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just make the cell system priority based, then you've got no issue.

    27. Re:What's so special about this? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be so bad... plumbing has a decent upload rate. And its users' contributions are at least as good as a lot of Net content these days...

    28. Re:What's so special about this? by prockcore · · Score: 1


      Not that I'm proposing IP-over-water-pipes or anything...


      Personally, IP into water pipes.

    29. Re:What's so special about this? by MC_Cancer_Pants · · Score: 1

      the next time you're stuck in a collapsed building like at the WTC towers.

      I don't think that anyone will be stuck in the collapsed WTC towers again.

      And if you were REALLY in an emergency, you could simply drive away from the city, into the mountains where there is less interference from BPL and contact emergency personelle. It's not like you are in a rush, or anything.

    30. Re:What's so special about this? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      well, if you read a little more closely, it said stuck in a collapsed building like at the wtc towers, note the like.

      In any case, if you're really in an emergency, it may be hard to drive with a severed leg, smashed torso, severe burns, exploded car, streets filled with millions of people, gas shortage, whatever, theres a lot of reasons that you might not be able to drive in a true emergency. Plus, not everywhere has mountains and it doesnt do much good if youre trying to communicate with people at the scene.. That would be like telling your local police officers that to use their radios they must drive to the mountains.

    31. Re:What's so special about this? by ultranova · · Score: 1
      Just make the cell system priority based, then you've got no issue.

      Unless, of course, the disaster took out the cell stations.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    32. Re:What's so special about this? by MC_Cancer_Pants · · Score: 1

      well, if you read a little more closely, I said some rediculous things, note the sarcasm.

      I think that we should run the entire world in fiber. I think we polute the airwaves alot as is, this is going to about double it from the looks of it.

    33. Re:What's so special about this? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      I wholeheartedly agree to the 'fiber the world' project. That would be a solution to just about everything communications.

    34. Re:What's so special about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're basing this on what evidence?

    35. Re:What's so special about this? by tcgroat · · Score: 1
      What isn't so special is the sharing. A DSL line is yours alone, so while its data rate isn't as fast it works pretty well in actual use.

      BPL has the same sharing problems as a cable modem, but with a lower data rate available for sharing. The overall throughput (in bits/sec) depends on both the transmission bandwidth (in Hz) and the signal-to-noise ratio (in dB). BPL suffers compared to cable both in the frequency response and in the noise level.

      Being unshielded, BPL also must run at lower signal levels than cable to comply with FCC interference limits. There also are many noise sources on the power grid (which is why you put a power filter/surge supressor on the computer).

      If BPL attracts enough subscribers to pay for the equipment and line upgrades, the performance won't be the "broadband nirvana" alluded to in the press. And unlike cable modems (where they can re-allocate an unpopular video channel for downstream data), there's no easy way to significantly increase BPL speeds. It really looks like a technological dead-end. It's time to quit dilly-dallying with makeshift solutions, and start stringing fiber to the home!

  3. Tap in... by SirChris · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want to see the first guy to to try tap into that broadband illegally....bzzzp!

    1. Re:Tap in... by Fiona+Winger · · Score: 1

      Hmm, if you can get a "Cable Box" to gain access to other channels for free, I wonder if you couldn't increase the speed of your own cable through illegal uses. Anyone have any info on this?

    2. Re:Tap in... by pclminion · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I want to see the first guy to to try tap into that broadband illegally....bzzzp!

      Considering that the power line is (drum roll please) a giant freaking antenna, all you really need to tap into someone's traffic is a radio receiver.

      Yay! Now we get to have the detriments of wireless systems (interference, monitoring by third parties, etc.) without any of the benefits of, well, being wireless.

      Dumbest idea ever.

    3. Re:Tap in... by Whyrph · · Score: 1

      Um ..I'm sure they've thought of that. I've been hearing about this for a while, so I bet they've put it through its paces. Maybe they use uncommon frequencies so that there isn't much interference .. or maybe they use something more complex than a simple up-down in voltage to represent a bit? I'm sure they came up with something.

    4. Re:Tap in... by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Wait.. wait a minute... if this were true, why can't you tap into a cable line? same kind of system: use the frequencies NOT in use by the end device to send lots of information quickly. Something smells fishy...

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    5. Re:Tap in... by pclminion · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Wait.. wait a minute... if this were true, why can't you tap into a cable line?

      Because cable line was designed for wide-band signals: it's coaxial!

      A power line, OTOH, is just a very long piece of wire.

    6. Re:Tap in... by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

      That's actually one of the main concerns with this. While I think it's a cool idea, the interference is supposed to be pretty rough. Bad enough to mess up ham radio operators and such.

      That said, I guess we have to wait and see just HOW bad it is. Maybe it's worse on paper than it is in reality. Or maybe it's worse out in the real world, destroying everyone's wireless networks, phones, cell phones, radions, etc...worse than anyone thought of. We have to wait and see. And how will we know until we do a full scale rollout? I'm going to be watching this one like a hawk, as I'm sure you will.

      --

      "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    7. Re:Tap in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how exactly would a firewall help in the least?

    8. Re:Tap in... by Xilo · · Score: 1

      A plain firewall wouldn't help much - the connection would have to be encrypted. A firewall would only block inbound, unsolicited traffic from coming either via the Internet or through the outrageously unlikely (and useless, to boot) pirate transmissions (by the d00d sitting underneath the power lines outside your house with a laptop and a portable power plant mounted to the roof of his car.)

      --
      Read; Write; Execute
    9. Re:Tap in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see, a wireless network needs a base and at least one wireless netword card to get started. Whereas with this system, as you said yourself, all you need is a radio receiver. So it seems to me that... BOPL is even better than wireless. :^P

    10. Re:Tap in... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Um ..I'm sure they've thought of that. I've been hearing about this for a while, so I bet they've put it through its paces. Maybe they use uncommon frequencies so that there isn't much interference .. or maybe they use something more complex than a simple up-down in voltage to represent a bit? I'm sure they came up with something.

      If they're using the standard BPL frequencies, every ham radio, emergency radio, and military radio within a hundred miles will be able to pick up the transmissions.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    11. Re:Tap in... by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Informative

      It won't affect cell phones and wireless networks. It will affect ham radio and other HF services. You will be able to receive the signals with a properly designed receiver. Whether or not you will be able to decrypt them will depend on how good a job the industry does on security.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    12. Re:Tap in... by Ice_Balrog · · Score: 1

      SSH anyone?

      --
      #include "sig.h"
    13. Re:Tap in... by slasher999 · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe not. I'm excited to hear from some fellow hams in Cincinati about how this effects the usable radio spectrum. Everything we've heard until now has been little more than educated guesses as far as I'm concerned. Let's see some real data!

      --kc2kth

    14. Re:Tap in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the dumb one. This system is tried and true. It works, and it works well. The way the data is sent isn't all that different from the way it's sent over phone lines.
      Besides, you don't think the data is sent in cleartext, do you ?

    15. Re:Tap in... by nervous_twitch · · Score: 1
      The only useful hardware-based firewall is the one between your legs and the engine in a car. ALL (TCP/IP) firewalls are software-based. A firewall has a CPU that follows instructions stored in RAM or ROM and has input and output, so it is a computer running software.

      The only difference I can see between what you refer to as a hardware based firewall and a software based firewall is that the "hardware based" firewalls are usually full of proprietary software and hardware.

      How does this make them any more effective or secure?

      --
      Trees everywhere, and not a forest in sight.
    16. Re:Tap in... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Nope, it runs on top of some Ham radio bands. The power companies just shoved it through the FCC against protests by basically everyone else who uses those bands, it's basically going to ruin them in areas where BPL goes in.


      Supposedly there will be capabilities to notch out specific interfering frequencies, but we'll see, I'm very skeptical.


      And just to answer questions before they get asked, yes cable television also overlaps frequencies for a lot of other services, but cable television signals are contained in a shielded coax cable, separate from the rest of the universe. BPL signals will not be, instead they'll basically be running on huge, miles-long random-wire antennas.


      On the other hand, I'm curious as to whether someone with the correct radio equipment could monitor the BPL signal -- wouldn't be able to "use" it for internet access because injecting the upstream signal would be a problem, but you could at least see everything that was flowing up and down the wire. Like a wireless packet sniffer.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    17. Re:Tap in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I strongly suggest you learn about cable tv and the wires it travels on in your local area. like the fact that fiber optics are used for 90% of the distance the signal has to go and is converted into a set of RF frequencies to ride on cheap coaxial cable into your home.

      try this secret research tool....

      www.google.com

      Shhh! dont tell anyone!

    18. Re:Tap in... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      alright, show me ONE exploit for a smc barricade firewall. or better yet, show me an exploit or crack for any of the cisco firewalls.

      Oh wait, you cant because they dont exist.... yet.

      and I highly doubt that they ever will. even the cheap SMC barricades or even a free linux firewall built right are completely secure even against a uber-super cracker with kung-fu grip! the cracker needs to take over a computer INSIDE the firewall to attack the firewall directly. come on, this is newbie level cracking/hacking stuff here.

      99% of your security weaknesses in a network are the holes in the workstations and servers INSIDE the firewall. the firewall it's self is never the weakness UNLESS it is running on a workstation... I.E. a software firewall.... and even then, the only real weakness to that is that a simple trojan can easily find and disable the service that is running it.... that can't be done as easily with a hardware firewall... even the $25.00 cheapie SMC's

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:Tap in... by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0

      DUH! But it is dedicated to the task and is not prone to being unloaded do to taking up resources on the pc it is protecting.... i.e Zone Alarm. And A NAT firewall can cover an entire network.

  4. I can't wait! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait! I'm going to go tear a lamp cord off the lamp, fray the wires, and jam them into my modem port. Pretty soon I'll be surfing the way Al Gore meant us to!

    signed, Les Nessman.

    1. Re:I can't wait! by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can't wait! I'm going to go tear a lamp cord off the lamp, fray the wires, and jam them into my modem port.

      You can try it today : just solder a RJ-11 on your lamp cord and plug it to the modem. You'll get a really hot internet connection in no time flat!

      Pretty soon I'll be surfing the way Al Gore meant us to!

      Yes, the above method will allow you to do exactly that.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:I can't wait! by El · · Score: 1

      "You know, they say a person's name says a lot about what kind of person they are... what was your name again?"

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    3. Re:I can't wait! by gid · · Score: 1

      No sense in going to all that trouble. Just get one of these cables. I think Belkin makes them.

    4. Re:I can't wait! by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Internet Overload

      (A)bort, (R)etry, (J)zzzyzyc *poof*

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    5. Re:I can't wait! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that cable PoE (power over ethernet) compliant ?

    6. Re:I can't wait! by GrodinTierce · · Score: 2
      just solder a RJ-11 on your lamp cord and plug it to the modem.

      You may think you're joking, but you obviously haven't seen this.

      --


      Tierce
      Who sponsors your feelings?
  5. "Only a few buck more"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since when is twice as much "only a few bucks more"? Hint: AOL doesn't count as one of "the local dialup providers".

    1. Re:"Only a few buck more"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even if dialup was free i'd still pay for broadband, along with a lot of people.

    2. Re:"Only a few buck more"??? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Since when is twice as much "only a few bucks more"?

      Uhh... when it was only a few bucks to begin with?

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    3. Re:"Only a few buck more"??? by Aerion · · Score: 1

      Since when is twice as much "only a few bucks more"? Hint: AOL doesn't count as one of "the local dialup providers".

      The main local dialup provider in Cincinnati is Fuse, run by Cincinnati Bell, who also provide broadband service (sure, laugh at the name, but I've been happy with my 6+ years of very good service).

      Last I checked, Fuse dial-up costs about $17/month, or $12/month when combined in certain ways with other phone services. So the parent poster has a point - $30/month is not exactly "only a few bucks more."

    4. Re:"Only a few buck more"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly though, the cost of dialup is almost as much as broadband at my house because we need a second phone line to use it. That's $25 + $20 = $45. That's for ONE dialup line. I pay $45 for broadband now and hook up all 3 computers at once and get 300+ KBps down. Win-Win in my situation.

      Hell, there are some people that don't even have phone lines any more. A phone line where I live now costs like $35/mo at minimum after taxes and the "you get these options or we'll charge you for them anyway" fees.

      I don't need that shit. Screw you Verizon. I'll get broadband an a cell phone. Saving money and getting speed and portability while I'm at it. (Nevermind the various arguments against the reliability of cellular 911).

      Now if you were going to just dial up once a day to check your Hotmail account then sure, you should just keep your $10/mo YourLocalInternetCo dialup and a single phone line.

  6. 1 mb/s upstream for $30? by dewhite · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if they will deliver on the promise of 1 mb/s upstream. Getting a megabit down is common place these days, but that kind of upload bandwidth would be nice to have for 30 bucks a month...

    --
    -dewhite
    1. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they can deliver and the service becomes commonplace, you'd definitely see an increase of quality game servers. I have a pretty nice secondary computer that I'd like to host games on, but not at the price of a T1. So yeah, 1 mb/s up would be nice for 30 bucks a month.

    2. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by CrystalCut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nice? Nice??

      My god, it would be sublime! Comcast, AT&T, Charter, Cox (and any other big cable companies) charge $$$$ for upload speeds over 128kbps. And that's assuming that your in an area where they can offer those higher speeds to a residence, or bother to offer "commercial" service.

      Comcast wants over $200 a month for a commercial service that offers 256kbps up. Cox, who I will be using after I move in 2 weeks, offers 3mb down / 256kbps up for $79. That's their commercial service. But..wait for it...for 3mb down / 384 up they want $325.00. I can't speak for AT&T or Charter specifically, as I have not recently lived in areas where either service is available.

      If this type of broadband proves reliable, affordable to deploy, and sells for under $50.00 a month, cable companies are going to be in very big trouble...assuming they ignore the obvious.

    3. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by Rosyna · · Score: 4, Informative

      There goes the mod points i just had.

      For 3mb down/384 up Cox charges only 199/mo, business account. At least here in phoenix.

    4. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by CoolMoDee · · Score: 2, Informative

      roadrunner is 3mb/384kbit for residental cable, and you can host whatever you want on it for 45 bucks a month. Sure, your ip is dynamic, but it only changes like once every 6 months - year. Even then, im sure you could get the static ip for a few bucks more each month...

      --
      Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
    5. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by eyempack · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think this throws another player into the fray. One of the main things i hope happens it it becomes a 3 horse race between cable/dsl/power. Cable companies will be forced to improve performance and reduce prices DSL will be forced to expand network coverage allowing for rural America and other huge city's to have coverage. This will also make them fix their price structure. And power, because it already has the infrastructure up will force them to add more infrastructure to compete. This can only be good as far as a economic standpoint. Broadband is still an oligopoly but [hopefully] once wireless and other alternative technologies abound we will have a truly competitive market.

    6. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by CrystalCut · · Score: 1

      I'm in Northern Virginia. Now, what I didn't mention in my first post was that "supposedly" residential service (which I can't get) in that area has gotten kinda cool..... 3mbps down / 902k up. Some new fiber thing they got going. Dunno what their rates are for Internet without TV, but I think its around $54.00 per month.

    7. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by Sparky77 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It probably will be at full speed at first, but then they will crank it down after they've attracted a large customer base. ISP behavior 101.

      --
      One bad monkey spoils the whole barrel.
    8. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      It really depends on the company and location. I get 384 up to Time Warner in NYC for $50/month.

    9. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by Enonu · · Score: 1

      Regular broadband in Phoenix is 3mbit down/256kbs Up for something like $40 a month.

      Ask your neighbor who thinks the Internet is only the web to have COX install high speed broadband at his place. Tell him you'll pay for it and set him up for free Internet access. Bridge his connection and yours together, and there's a 6mbit down/512kbs up for you.

    10. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Interesting

      in my market southern NJ, comcast includes 256k up on residential

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    11. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by radish · · Score: 1

      I have 3mb/384k from Time Warner and the total bill (including every cable channel, movies, sports etc) is ~$120pm. Not too bad really.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    12. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The price for upstream varies wildly by location. I have comcast and I have had 256kbps upstream since it was attbi - maybe that's why. I was paying $50/mo, now I pay $60/mo. Incidentally it appears they have raised my downstream too, my last test got 3440kbps. Of course AFAIK I'm still only allowed to download 90GB/mo.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by lokedhs · · Score: 1
      Sorry for posing AC, but this might be seen as a troll by some. Actually it isn't, it's called "showing off". :-)

      Here in sweden, getting good upload speeds is quite common. I am getting my 2 mbit upload/download upgraded soon, and I will then be on par with all my friends who has 10 mbit upload and download. There are some lucky people who has more than that.

      Now for the good part. The price for this is around 40 USD per month. :-)

    14. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      /agree

      WTH is wrong with you people? 1 Mbps up *and* down for $30 would be absolutely freaking incredible. I'm on MDM cable internet now. For $35 a month (one year special) I'm getting 2-3 Mbps down and about .24 Mbps up. I would KILL to get 1 Mbps up.

      The interference thing could be interesting... but I kinda doubt the FCC would let them go live if it proved to be a problem.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    15. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the Sacramento area, surewest broadband offers 10Mbps up/down over their fiber optic network for $50/month (cheaper if you bundle it with their digital phone and/or digital TV- all 3 together is $99/month).

    16. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by eatfrog · · Score: 1

      Hehe.
      I have 8/.08 and I pay about $45/month.

      This is in Sweden, btw.

    17. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Houston. I have Earthlink Cable over Time Warner's network. I have about 3 Mbps down and 300 Kbps (40 KBps) up. For about $42.00 + $2.00 in taxes, per month. I think it's still expensive, $20/month would be a fair price I believe, but then again, I transfer more data in 24 hours then a lot of people do in 24 days. I don't really have any outages, maybe one or two within the last few months, never lasting more than a few hours.

      I mainly host lots of low bandwidth services and the majority of the data that I upload (other than P2P) is text, so 40 KBps is plenty. I wouldn't want to give up 3/.3 Mbps down/up though for 1/1 Mbps down/up.

      -- paper

    18. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by value_added · · Score: 1

      SBC offers a package for 1.5-3.0Mbs down / 384Kbps costing only 44.95 (single dynamic IP). The 5-static IP plan is 99.99.

      Not sure why discussions of broadband get framed as though broadband is provided by cable companies only, but my own opinion is that I find it difficult enough relying on my cable company to provide cable service let alone considering them for internet connectivity. And phone service from a cable company? Not bloody likely.

      A utility company offering broadband, however, is something I would consider.

    19. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by gregmac · · Score: 1
      Comcast wants over $200 a month for a commercial service that offers 256kbps up.

      I'm in Ontario, Canada, and the typical DSL account around here, up until a few weeks ago was 1.5mbps/384kbps. I pay $35CDN/month for that at home, but at most you pay $45 (including modem rental). At the office, we pay $59/month (including modem) for 1.5mbps/640kbps.

      A couple weeks ago, Bell Nexxia (who owns and operates the physical network, and wholesales to other ISPs) upgraded the whole network. Former 1.5mbps accounts are now 3mbps, and 3mbps accounts are now 4mbps. At the office, the upload speed is now 800kbps, I'm not sure what it is at home now. This changed happened at no extra cost.

      for 3mb down / 384 up they want $325.00

      That sounds espessially crazy. In Ottawa and downtown Toronto, you can get SDSL, at 2mbps/2mbps, for around $350CDN. Unfortunately I don't live there.. but when SDSL comes here, I will most definately switch.

      --
      Speak before you think
    20. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by Cecil · · Score: 1

      While I agree wholeheartedly with your sentiment of upload speads being artificially and retardedly expensive, I do have to mention that the $200 "business" line gets you lots of fun added perks like the poor network admin's cellphone number. :D

      3am: "Hi, this is (insert my incorporated-but-mostly-fake business name here). We've lost our Internet connection, what's going on?" ... I would probably feel more sorry for him if I hadn't also been woken up at 3am. *sigh*

    21. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not sure why discussions of broadband get framed as though broadband is provided by cable companies only.

      DSL has a range limit and may not be available at any price. Cable is often cheaper and faster.

    22. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by xSquaredAdmin · · Score: 1

      Whereas RoadRunner, in most areas, offers at least 3072/384 in most areas as part of their base package.

      --
      Crushing dreams at the speed of sarcasm
    23. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by CrystalCut · · Score: 1

      "fun added perks like the poor network admin's cellphone number. :D"

      Right you are. I spent some 10 hours haggling with Cox, and the county I am moving to, about pulling another cable line into the basement I'm moving into. But, because there is no "kitchen" in said basement, the county does not allow that.

      And with the business account I will be getting (which I will use during the day to do my IT job), I know I will get more support then a residential account. Of course, the support might be as stupid, but management will be more on my side. LOL.

    24. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by martinde · · Score: 1

      > My god, it would be sublime! Comcast, AT&T, Charter, Cox (and any other big cable companies) charge $$$$ for upload speeds over 128kbps

      FWIW, here (in Cincinnati) our DSL is 3M down, and 768kbs up. (See this for details. Funny thing is, last week it was 768/384. I'm not complaining.

    25. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here in SF bay area. I think they doubled it from 128k sometime last year.

    26. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      I have Timewarner RR service and I pay $50/mo and I get 3mb down (just recently upgraded to that) and 256kbps up. Not bad I dont think but i dont run game servers. It's been down maybe 4 times in the last 14 months. 1 of those was for an upgrade.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    27. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by dewhite · · Score: 1

      Ah, now for the true troll: In sweden you are paying for your high speed internet partially through your 50% tax rate no doubt...

      --
      -dewhite
    28. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Nice? Nice??

      Quite. I'd drop $50 a month without blinking, if it would get me 1Mbps up
      and down, even if the ping times suck. I don't live in a city anywhere near
      the size of Cinci, though, and can't even buy DSL here yet, so I'm not going
      to be holding my breath.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    29. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by jonadab · · Score: 2, Informative

      > once wireless and other alternative technologies abound

      Satellite wireless broadband is fairly available. I can get it here, where
      DSL is not available. However, it's only good for downstream, which rather
      limits its usefulness as far as I'm concerned. I could download ISOs instead
      of buying CDs from cheapbytes.com, but I could not, for example, do X11
      forwarding to my work system from home or to my home system from work. So
      it's not worth the outrageous price they want to charge for it. Also, there
      are compatibility issues depending on what OS you use.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    30. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. I must be spoiled (or misinformed, but I don't think so). Comcast in my area (Oakland County, MI) offers 3mb download and 256kb upload as the standard package for $39.95.

      I've done a few informal tests since that has been advertised and download and upload are indeed almost twice as fast as they were a year ago.

    31. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      your
      download 2802 kbps

      your
      upload 244 kbps

      comcast... $50 a month including basic cable (legally). Must be different for those "big cities"...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    32. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by nfsilkey · · Score: 1

      Sucker. Move to Austin. :)

      Roadrunner offers 3mbit down / 384kbit up for ~$40/mo. Easily maxed bidirectionally consistently. Whee.

    33. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      For 3mb down/384 up Cox charges only 199/mo, business account. At least here in phoenix.

      That's really odd, because I have residential cox and according to the bandwidth calculator in All Seeing Eye, I have 1.5mbits down and 1 mbits up.

      At least here in Tucson.

    34. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by Zathras11 · · Score: 1

      On Cox, you said: "But..wait for it...for 3mb
      down / 384 up they want $325.00."

      Where? In Antarctica? I have Cox for HSI in
      Ohio and they charge $39.95 for what you state
      above. Granted, that is with regular basic
      cable at another $40 + tax, but even without
      that the HSI you list in the quote above would
      only be $49.95!

    35. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by freeefalln · · Score: 1

      here in Richmond, VA Comcast only charges $90 for Business Cable, 3mb down/256up. i assume market drives price.

    36. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by unics · · Score: 0

      For $100, I get 5 Mbps down and 384 kbps up from Comcast Pro.

    37. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by tiger99 · · Score: 1
      For a start, the service is blatantly illegal and will be closed down when the FCC wake up to the massisve interference being caused. Also, you will not get high bandwidth in the reverse direction, it would need a ridiculously high (and unsafe!) RF power in your modem to propagate the signal to all and sundry, as well as the equipment in the substation. You need to drive the entire local circuit, not just the direct path.

      This whole thing is disgraceful, and it is up to all legitimate users of the spectrum concerned to oppose it. Anyone who wastes money on this is as stupid as someone who invests in SCO, and for very similar reasons.

    38. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by HBergeron · · Score: 1

      I get 5mb down and 768 or so up from RCN (starpower) for $30 a month - it's their "megamodem" service - all in all the best ISP I have every had. On the other hand, I expect them to be devoured and dismembered any time now, so I better hope they hurry up and bring this powerline networking to DC.

      --
      THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal...
    39. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by hodo · · Score: 1

      My dsl in Cincinnati (Zoomtown) is now 3200 Kbps down, 952 Kbps up. Thats just the basic package at $40. IIRC Cincinnati was also the first city to actually have a choice in residential broadbrand between cable and dsl. It's been here quite a bit longer than most cities so price and service levels are definately dependent on the market. One thing is for certain, competition is good for the customers.

    40. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3mbps down 768kbps up $41/month

    41. Re:1 mb/s upstream for $30? by electrofreak · · Score: 1

      I get 3mb down and 384kb up from Earthlink for only $41.95/mon. This is the residential account. $199/mon is VERY overpriced for that bandwidth.

      --
      I need a sig.
  7. Re: can we expect... by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 5, Interesting
    No.

    Ham Radio will interfere with it severely, and there won't be a damn thing the provider can do because it's under FCC part 15, which must accept any harmful interference, especially from PROPERLY LICENSED services. Of course, the same rules will also hold the power company for any interference caused to the amateur radio service. Don't expect this to be available for long. Maybe now everybody will see that it doesn't work and let the abomination die like it should.

  8. Symmetric speeds!? by compbrain · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is it that the (currently) most controversial method of broadband internet access gets symmetric speeds by default? Are power companies the only ones to realize that it makes sense to give identical upload and download?

    --
    print 'Hello world!';
    http://compbrain.net
    1. Re:Symmetric speeds!? by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because often broadband companies have business plans, and said business plans are what they want someone utilizing high upload rates to use. It's a way of securing additional money from the customer without really providing any additional service other than removing their own caps.

      Also, some might say this helps the whole "two-tier internet" with privileged hosts being the ones who serve, and regulars like us only being able to receive.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:Symmetric speeds!? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      No, they just haven't realized they can make a profit by charging 10x as much for high upload speed. I'm sure that's coming.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    3. Re:Symmetric speeds!? by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      Why is it that the (currently) most controversial method of broadband internet access gets symmetric speeds by default?

      Many of the devices used for this type of service use the transmission medium like an Ethernet -- there's no separate upstream and downstream, it's one chunk of spectrum shared by all the devices on a time-division basis. DSL and cable modems both use separate pieces of spectrum for downstream and upstream. Cable plant is particularly asymmetric even in analog terms -- a typical modern build has ~700 MHz of downstream bandwidth but often <30 MHz of usable upstream. Splitting the spectrum more equally is unfortunately impractical due to the placement of analog channel 2, FCC rules about must-carry, and the realities of broadband analog filters and amplifiers.

      One really ugly possibility with BPL is that in some cases the 1 Mbit/sec upstream and downstream will represent the total bandwidth available. You can get it if there's no one else active, and if you're doing something that doesn't require ack'ing in the other direction, etc. Assuming it's popular, there may be some unpleasant surprises when 100 subscribers discover they're all sharing a very limited resource during the peak hours.

    4. Re:Symmetric speeds!? by MC_Cancer_Pants · · Score: 1

      "Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)" - Ambrose Bierce

      You mean "Puto cogitem ergo puto sim"

      Obligatory Monty Python Reference:

      "Ah. Ah, dative, sir! Ahh! No, not dative! Not the dative, sir! No! Ah! Oh, the... accusative! Accusative! Ah! 'Domum', sir! 'Ad domum'! Ah! Oooh! Ah!"

  9. interference issues by jwhamilton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    so what are the interference ramifications of this?? i still hear people complain about this. i think the biggest thing to note is the price. im under the impression that cable/dsl are typically 40-50 around the US. if this is an indication, then i think power internet will become prevelent quickly. cheaper and more widely available (theoretically)

    1. Re:interference issues by Hungry+Admin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, sure it works, in theory. Communism works. In theory.
      --Homer J. Simpson

      Everyone in Cincinatti is about to find out that the emperor has no clothes. I would be happy to drive to the part of town with BPL and have a nice long conversation on 7 MHz with my buddies... that would demonstrate how asinine this BPL is.

      There is a reason why international agreements are required for the use of frequencies under 30 MHz. Worldwide propagation makes this a precious and scarce resource. Greedy power company bastards...

      --
      Be who you are and say what you feel, because the people who mind don't matter, and the people who matter don't mind.
    2. Re:interference issues by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well it has long been a state of mind with geeks(especially slashdot) that it can't work, wont work, will never work, wont happen, can't happen, will not happen & yadda yadda yadda blabablababa - offering couple of links to some ham guys who have had some problems with their setup & so on, usually with couple of +5 comments about how you need the ham guys in case of emergency.

      heres something to consider: it is in use in many places in the world.

      why does geeks who generally have some knoweledge of things somehow think that there's a magic barrier(as in cannot be reduced to non-meaningful) on preventing data-over-powerline?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:interference issues by Woody77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe because they've done research into the topic, and in-depth research at that? And discovered that while possible, there are serious side-effects that CAN be worked around, but probably aren't worth it. Especially if the wiring is 100% "clean".

      Then all sorts of fun breaks out...

      Not to mention the radiated energy problems... That's a BIG antenna.

      But Digital Spread Sprectrum over PL is very, very finicky. The impedance changes with frequency, and changes with frequency with respect to everything that's using power. Start an old fridge and you're DL rate goes to nothing. A lightbulb about to burn out in your neighbor's house could throw enough hashing energy back into the system to cause dropped packets, or if your neighbor arc-welds.. Well, then, you're going to discover a LOT of interesting problems surfing while they're working.

      It's not twisted pair. Not even close. Twisted pair is a walk in the park compared to the land of unshielded, unbalanced, bare steel wires strung from pole to pole to pole for 15 miles between you and wherever the CO is. And if they've decided solely to overcome the problem through power, then when you start to hear your packets through you're turned-off radio, you'll begin to understand the problems with this.

  10. So? by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So a major city has it. Seems to me the only people who would really gain anything are people in rural areas. I get > 3Mbps with my cable line, more than 3 times as fast for about the same price. Although, I can see it being great as a proof-of-concept...

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
    1. Re:So? by tweakr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You may get 3Mbps downstream (as do I with my cable setup), but note that cable providers limit the upstream - usually to 384kbps or less. So in that aspect at least, the broadband-over-powerlines is more than double the cable offering.

      A better comparison, I would think, would be that this is 2/3rds of a T1, at a FRACTION of the cost!

      I'm also wondering if b-over-p suffers from the same amount of network congestion problems as cable (and even DSL) are prone too....

      --
      Worrying works!! 99% of all the stuff I worry about never happens :)
    2. Re:So? by 00420 · · Score: 1

      How fast is your upload speed with that?

      I have Cox cable and also get 3Mbps down, but I only get 256kbps up.

    3. Re:So? by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      Good points about upload speed... I get 384 up but that's just fine, I hardly ever need to upload huge files. Seems like it might be a good alternative for people who do though.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    4. Re:So? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      So a major city has it. Seems to me the only people who would really gain anything are people in rural areas. I get > 3Mbps with my cable line, more than 3 times as fast for about the same price. Although, I can see it being great as a proof-of-concept...

      First, you have to be damned rural not to have cable, so it's not really *novel* for that many people. That said, this offering sounds pretty good, and you don't have to get cable with it (if you don't want cable TV, or if you have DirecTV for example). It also brings another competitor to the party, which is always good - particularly since DSL seems to be losing the broadband war in a lot of ways.

      From a lot of standpoints, this is a good thing. Let's put it this way - it's the only way to get real broadband for $30/month, without having to buy another product first. Well, I guess power, but I think I can assume everyone's got that, even with the pedantic slashdot crowd.

    5. Re:So? by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine lives in the mountains just west of Colorado Springs, a fairly large city. He can't get cable, dsl, or any other broadband. And he only lives ~20 minutes outside the city.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    6. Re:So? by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      But I do agree that competition is almost always a good thing...

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    7. Re:So? by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      I'm less than a mile from a small-town downtown, and it's a downtown with a 'major' small private college in it, not some backwater. And we don't have cable on this side of city limits.

      --
      ---
    8. Re:So? by cptgrudge · · Score: 1
      A better comparison, I would think, would be that this is 2/3rds of a T1, at a FRACTION of the cost!

      But with any sort of T1 you have an SLA that states a certain amount of uptime, usually above 99%. This offering has none of that guaranteed uptime.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    9. Re:So? by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      even better! -I- live FIVE minutes outside of the city and i can't get cable (1200 bucks to wire it to our property), DSL (too far from the telco or whatever) nor any kind of broadband...

    10. Re:So? by apachetoolbox · · Score: 1
      2/3rds of a T1, at a FRACTION of the cost!
      isn't 2/3's a faction also?

      [laught, its a joke]
  11. Sounds ok on the surface...but by ScottGant · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know that broadband over power lines sounds nice, but what if you lose power? How ya gonna surf the....oh...um...nevermind.

    --

    "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    1. Re:Sounds ok on the surface...but by jdreed1024 · · Score: 4, Funny
      I know that broadband over power lines sounds nice, but what if you lose power? How ya gonna surf the....oh...um...nevermind.

      Doesn't bother me, I have a UPS, so my computer stays on during brief power outages. And now that the Internet comes over power lines, I'll have connectivity from my UPS too! I'm still jealous of my friend who's got a generator, though. He can generate his own power, and now he can generate his own Internet! Wish I could do that...

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    2. Re:Sounds ok on the surface...but by VoraciousGorak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Doesn't bother me, I have a UPS, so my computer stays on during brief power outages. And now that the Internet comes over power lines, I'll have connectivity from my UPS too! I'm still jealous of my friend who's got a generator, though. He can generate his own power, and now he can generate his own Internet! Wish I could do that...

      When the power goes out, it usually means a problem with something further up the line than a simple wall outlet. Unless you found a way to store the Internet in its entirely in your UPS! Wish I could store the Internet in my UPS.

    3. Re:Sounds ok on the surface...but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      dickhead, that's what he meant (did you even read the "generator" part?). you had to go and explain the whole joke, thereby making it unfunny. way to go.

    4. Re:Sounds ok on the surface...but by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I know the parent is modded funny, but, would the noise filter on a UPS strip out the data stream or not?

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    5. Re:Sounds ok on the surface...but by cabra771 · · Score: 1

      best laugh I had all day.

      --

      -my other sig is your mom
    6. Re:Sounds ok on the surface...but by joggle · · Score: 1

      Yes, it would. I have powerline ethernet at home and can't plug the bridge into anything other than a wall outlet. Splitters and UPS devices filter out the high frequency data stream.

    7. Re:Sounds ok on the surface...but by fltsimbuff · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention this. I work in Tech support for a DSL company, and one day a customer called in complaining that their DSL was out. Upon troubleshooting, I found that they were on the east coast in the wake of a Hurricane, and their power was out.

      It is times like that, that make me lose faith in the human race...

    8. Re:Sounds ok on the surface...but by zurab · · Score: 1
      I'm still jealous of my friend who's got a generator, though. He can generate his own power, and now he can generate his own Internet! Wish I could do that...

      You are friends with Al Gore?
    9. Re:Sounds ok on the surface...but by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Hope you dont live in thunderstorm areas...

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    10. Re:Sounds ok on the surface...but by joggle · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, I don't. However, they claim to have built-in surge supressors of some form. I can only hope they are telling the truth. If you doubt their truthfulness, you could always buy a whole-house surge protector. They're much more effective against lightning anyways.

  12. re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It basically means that all those ppl without a cable provider in their area can now get broadband. And at quite a good speed and price as well. I pay more than that for a 512kb/s

  13. Will this work in apartment buildings? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I live in a pretty big apartment, and my landlord takes care of all of the electricity. Will I still be able to get broadband over power lines? I assume they should be able to work it like a cable modem (i.e. everyone in the building is on the same cable line), but don't know technical details about broadband over power lines.

    1. Re:Will this work in apartment buildings? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      No, because all it takes is for one bimbo with a 1960s hairdryer to bring your connection to screeching hault.

      Ever watch UHF TV when that happens? Nuff said.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Will this work in apartment buildings? by illuminata · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who needs an internet connection if you have a bimbo around?

      Well, pending that she's not as old as her hairdryer...

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    3. Re:Will this work in apartment buildings? by BeerMilkshake · · Score: 1

      I am not an expert, but I believe that if data is coming to the building, then it will be available to every unit.

      It seems to me that the transformer is the natural 'firewall', having very high impedance to high frequency signals. The data has to 'hop' the transformer that connects the apartment to the power grid somehow. As long as there are no impedances between you and your neighbour units, you should all be on the same network. Of course, your neighbour could run a packet sniffer, so you better make sure you are using secure links!

    4. Re:Will this work in apartment buildings? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1
      No, because all it takes is for one bimbo with a 1960s hairdryer to bring your connection to screeching hault.
      My apartment is in a converted commercial building. The 45 amps I have coming in on my own breakers assure that I never have a blown breaker, much less from anybody who isn't doing something in my apartment.
    5. Re:Will this work in apartment buildings? by Woody77 · · Score: 1

      It's the back-fed noise, which your breakers won't help with at all. If you're on the same transformer drop, you'll see their noise, too.

  14. Power Outages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Will this increase the possibility of power outages at all?

    1. Re:Power Outages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it might even reduce them, as the power company is responsible for something else as serious as electricity. The power company will have to step up its monitoring to keep both services available.

    2. Re:Power Outages by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      The power company will have to step up its monitoring to keep both services available.

      Ah! You must have lived with a diesel generator for too long.

      The utilities will just say "when computers aren't powered due to a power outage, they can't go on the internet anyway", and they'll keep providing bad service, and that'll be the extent of what they feel their new responsability is.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  15. And power over ethernet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The circle continues?

    1. Re:And power over ethernet. by UFNinja · · Score: 1

      It's simple really. EoPoE, or Ethernet over Power over Ethernet. :D

  16. bad URL by Korgrath · · Score: 5, Informative

    don't worry, Cinergy wasn't slashdotted, it was just a bad link actual Cinergy site

    --
    Theory of flight?! I'll teach you the theory of fist!!
    1. Re:bad URL by FooAtWFU · · Score: 5, Funny
      Does this mean that whenever we slashdot a server hosted on broadband-over-powerlines, there will be a big blackout? Wow! I can hardly wait!

      That was a joke, son.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:bad URL by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Of course, remember what happened last year in Ohio? ;)

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    3. Re:bad URL by Surak_Prime · · Score: 1

      I just figured with the Slashdot Effect, it was, "Show's over, Cinergy."

      Mod me down, but you know you watched the show with the hot rocker chicks, too. I won't tell if you don't.

      --
      :::The Spear in the heart of the Other is the Spear in the heart of You; You are He - Surak of Vulcan:::
    4. Re:bad URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope not, or the FBI will be hauling us in on terrorism charges!

  17. Gamers are going to LOVE this! by JDRipper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With that bandwidth at that price, Cincinatti gamers will be some serious LPB's. I am filled with gaming envy.

    --
    "You know Myra, some people might think you're cute. But me, I think you're one very large baked potato."
    1. Re:Gamers are going to LOVE this! by Rosyna · · Score: 1

      But I don't remember it saying anything about latency. I thought fixed-wireless was neat and fast (750 kilobytes/second down) until I learned the ping time was around 400-800ms.

    2. Re:Gamers are going to LOVE this! by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      Uhm, that would be a terrible wireless connection. I'm on a fixed wirless connection right now and it's at about 4ms from my ap to my ISP's AP which is roughly eight miles away. So while some wireless connections may have terrible latency that's going to be dependant on the conditions. It very well may be the same for BPL depending on the quality of the power lines, or the distance from the power station etc.

    3. Re:Gamers are going to LOVE this! by petabyte · · Score: 1

      Latency can be related to bandwidth but usually isn't. Online games today don't use alot of bandwidth, they just want it sent and recieved rather quickly. There's also the distance issue. Cincinatti gamers playing against me on a server in Texas are still going to suffer some sort of lag.

  18. Re: can we expect... by DarkHand · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ham Radio will interfere with it severely, and there won't be a damn thing the provider can do because it's under FCC part 15, which must accept any harmful interference, especially from PROPERLY LICENSED services.

    If you live in the Cincinatti area and have a HAM license, it's time to find some major power lines and start transmitting like your life depended on it!

  19. ZZZZZAP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Time for a industrial grade surge protector.

  20. Re: can we expect... by brain1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep. And since I'm a duly licensed amateur radio operator, then if it's rolled out in my area then they have to put up with the interference.

    I still think that interference with government services on the HF bands will be the death, if not at least the curtailment, this technology. At the very least it cant be deployed near any government installation.

  21. I hope its a success by haRDon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At least then the take up may improve if it's shown to be successful.

    Whats the data quota?

    Would be nice to be able to have broadband without having to rely on a phone service being active.

  22. I don't trust companies by tcd004 · · Score: 2, Funny

    using technology that hasn't already been tested and proven through 40 years of rigorous use.

    That's why I use Not@Home cable service.

    tcd004

  23. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAM Radio - The fat nerds Playstation.

  24. The effects of this on telcos and cable companies by prostoalex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Expect somewhat intense resistance to BPL from telecoms and cable companies. They are not just competing for broadband customer in the DSL/Cable/BPL high speed Internet market.

    Once you have a megabit-per-second+ line, you can start talking about all sorts of things, including VoIP and video on delivery piggy-backing on national grid.

  25. Re: can we expect... by cavebear42 · · Score: 5, Informative

    did you RTFA? "He said the utility has found no problem with radio wave interference, a concern raised by many amateur radio operators." After a 1 year test, it didn't interfere, and the FCC really wants this to happen. It is going forward.

  26. uncap your connection! by happyfrogcow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Throw away your surge protectors for more bandwidth! Install lightening rods to increase your chances of power surges! ;)

    1. Re:uncap your connection! by Temporal+Outcast · · Score: 1

      You forgot -

      Fly back into the future!!!!!! ;-)

      --

      Vote for a Man, Vote for Bush!
      Not a liberatarian flipflop hippie.
  27. Re: can we expect... by Threni · · Score: 1

    > Don't expect this to be available for long. Maybe now everybody will see that
    > it doesn't work and let the abomination die like it should.

    Sounds like a good time for US based geeks to take a bet. In the UK gambling companies will take bets on pretty much anything legal (though they pretty much all have policies which prohibit betting on the likely date of death of celebrities, or changes in (drug, for example) law). Perhaps someone in Ohio (or elsewhere) can check it out.

  28. Another area gets BPL.. by f8ejf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    another area's ham radio operators get it up the arse

    73 de F8EJF

  29. 1 Mb/s up and down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup - sure,

    Until your local FEMA | Red Cross | ATC |GVT | HAM | fires up his transmiter and attempts to do their job.

    You'll be lucky to get a SYN,ACK for your SYN at that point. And, being a 'Chapter 15' device, your complaints of poor service will fall on deaf ears - BPL must accept any interfearance it gets.

    Plus - If your local, licensed HF operator can show that BPL interfears with THEIR operations? Well, it's up to the BPL provider to fix it. Can you say: 'Connectivity outage' while they re-engineer sending broadband data down 50 year old wires?

    1. Re:1 Mb/s up and down? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Plus - If your local, licensed HF operator can show that BPL interfears with THEIR operations? Well, it's up to the BPL provider to fix it

      When was the last time you tried to get a utility to fix a problem when it interferes with their revenue stream?

      BPL means mucho $$$ for utilities. That means, the following is what will happen when you, the poor local ham who's getting shafted, try to report a problem:

      Ham: hello Foo Power, I'm getting HF noise from your BPL operations, and I want it fixed...

      Foo power: HELLO...PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME LOUDLY...TYPE 1 TO ACCESS YOUR ACCOUNT...TYPE 2 TO GET POWER...TYPE * OR STAY ON HOLD TO TALK TO AN OPERATOR...

      H: J.O.E. S.I.X.P.A.C.K. *beep*

      FP: Hello Sir, may I help you?

      H: Yes, I need to report a problem with your BPL operations : I'm a ham and I...

      FP: Yes Sir, I'll connect you to the Technical dept. Please hold ...

      H: Thank you.

      FP: Hello, this is Jeanne, how may I help you?

      H: I have this problem with your BPL thing. I'm a ham and...

      FP: We don't sell ham Sir. Please state your name and account number so I can access your Foo Power account.

      H: No no, I just want to report a problem with...

      FP: Oh I'm sorry Sir, this is the accounting department. I'll connect you back with the front desk. Please hold...


      etc etc...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:1 Mb/s up and down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmm, maybe you aughta read up on the success (and to date) cooperation between many utility companies and amateur operators.

      Besides - as soon as you've made "reasonable effort" to deal with the Utility direct - the issue get's escalated. ARRL channels and eventually direct to the FCC. Yes, it can take time and effort - but with the law on your side....

      Believe me - when "Uncle Charlie" calls "Ma & Pa Power Co", they listen - well. Something about take'n those $$ away get's their attention.

    3. Re:1 Mb/s up and down? by jim_deane · · Score: 1

      We'll report it to the FCC if they don't comply,
      and then they'll get a letter like this from
      Riley Hollingsworth at the FCC:

      (From FCC enforcement letters at www.arrl.org)

      July 10, 2003

      Mr. Peter Burg, CEO
      FirstEnergy Corporation
      76 South Main Street
      Akron, OH 44308

      Dear Mr. Burg:

      The Federal Communications Commission has received complaints that equipment operated by your utility may be causing harmful radio interference to an operator in the Amateur Radio Service. The complainant is:

      Donald Benedict, NN2Y
      1947 Teakwood Rd.
      Toms River NJ 08753-4547

      The FCC has the responsibility to require that utility companies rectify such problems within a reasonable time if the interference is caused by faulty power utility equipment. Under FCC rules, most power-line and related equipment is classified as an "incidental radiator." This term is used to describe equipment that does not intentionally generate any radio-frequency energy, but that may create such energy as an incidental part of its intended operation.

      To help you better understand your responsibilities under FCC rules, here are the most important rules relating to radio and television interference from incidental radiators:

      Title 47, CFR Section 15.5 General conditions of operation.

      (b) Operation of an intentional, unintentional, or incidental radiator is subject to the conditions that no harmful interference is caused and that interference must be accepted that may be caused by the operation of an authorized radio station, by another intentional or unintentional radiator, by industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) equipment, or by an incidental radiator.

      (c) The operator of the radio frequency device shall be required to cease operating the device upon notification by a Commission representative that the device is causing harmful interference. Operation shall not resume until the condition causing the harmful interference has been corrected.

      Title 47, CFR Section 15.13 Incidental radiators.

      Manufacturers of these devices shall employ good engineering practices to minimize the risk of harmful interference.

      Title 47, CFR Section 15.15 General technical requirements.

      (c) Parties responsible for equipment compliance should note that the limits specified in this part will not prevent harmful interference under all circumstances. Since the operators of Part 15 devices are required to cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problems (for example, see Sec. 15.105(b)).

      The complainant has attempted unsuccessfully to work through your usual complaint resolution process and as a result the matter has been referred to our office. The FCC prefers that those responsible for the proper operation of power lines assume their responsibilities fairly. This means that your utility company should locate the source of any interference caused by its equipment and make necessary corrections within a reasonable time.

      While the FCC has confidence that most utility companies are able to resolve these issues voluntarily, the FCC wants to make your office aware that this unresolved problem may be a violation of FCC rules and could result in a monetary forfeiture for each occurrence. At this stage, the FCC encourages the parties to resolve this problem without FCC intervention, but if necessary to facilitate resolution, the FCC may investigate possible rules violations and address appropriate remedies.

      The American Radio Relay League, a national organization of Amateur Radio operators, may be able to offer help and guidance about radio interference that involves Amateur Radio operators.

  30. Re: can we expect... by Bagheera · · Score: 4, Informative

    Amen. The interference this service causes on the amature bands is well documented at the ARRL website. I know there is the usual cry that Amature Radio is dead, and isn't useful, and what have you. But the fact is the amature radio service is a vital emergency service, and has a large population of experienced old-school hardware hackers who are still experimenting and adding to the art.

    Broadband is good.

    Broadband over powerlines - not so good.

    --
    Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
  31. Yay? by Tyrdium · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Have fun when you guys need to hold a huge event or get hit by a tornado or whatever, and the hams who are trained to do it can't do their jobs properly because of all the interference. Would you rather have 1 Mbps internet for $40 a month, which isn't that great compared to cable or DSL (I've seen 3000/800 Kbps for cable, by RCN), or reliable emergency communications? How would you feel if BPL shut down 911? I bet you wouldn't be too happy.

    1. Re:Yay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chances are, if the shit happens like that, the power is out anyways.

    2. Re:Yay? by bluprint · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In a major catastrophe, isn't it fairly likely that power lines will be down anyway (thereby eliminating HAM interference)?

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    3. Re:Yay? by shaka999 · · Score: 1

      Your assuming that these people can get DSL or cable. That may not be the case. As I understand it this technology could enable broadband access for many rural people who have no hope of other solutions in the near future.

      Seems it would be pretty easy to put a control valve on this service so if there is a catastrophe then its turned off thus not interfering with emergency operators. It would curtail the use of ham radios as a hobby but I'd bet there are a couple orders of magnitude more people using the internet service than there would be hams in an area.

      --
      One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    4. Re:Yay? by benoitg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's shortsighted. Do you really think HAMs in that area will keep training with and spending money on equipement if they can't operate it reliably EXCEPT when power is down? There is a limit to everyone's altruism...

    5. Re:Yay? by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

      The issue that the HAM's are saying is that even if you can use the HAMs in an emergency when the power is down, no one is going to have one anymore because the fun of it is sitting up in your attic chatting to someone halfway across the globe. (as opposed to sitting in your basement in the dark typing to someone halfway across the globe).

    6. Re:Yay? by pavon · · Score: 3, Informative

      In a major catastrophe, isn't it fairly likely that power lines will be down anyway (thereby eliminating HAM interference)?

      This has already been discussed ad-infinitem, but apparently all the moderators haven't been listening, so here it goes again.

      There are several major problems with that.
      1) It may be likely that transmitter does not have power, but it is equally likely that he will need to contact people who do.
      2) The major reason that ham radio is usefull in emergencies is because there is an active community of people that find ham radio a enjoyable recreation. Get rid of that and you will have less ham operators.
      3) There are all sorts of emergencies where people still have power, but HAM is needed. Doesn't anyone remember 9/11? The powerlines were fine, but the phone, cell, and internet were all completly saturated.

    7. Re:Yay? by fltsimbuff · · Score: 1

      Besides that, even if the power is still on, couldn't they shut down the Internet transmissions on an AS-NEEDED basis?

      Surely attending to a disaster could be seen as more important than the Internet connection going over the lines. All they need to do is add a kill switch.

    8. Re:Yay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, HAMS will still be interfering with everybody even if the power goes out.

    9. Re:Yay? by Ashtead · · Score: 1
      The problem isn't just the interference from the lines in the vicinity, which might be without power. There will still be interference coming from areas further away that still have power and BPL intact, since the HF frequencies in question are quite long-range.

      73 de LB6ED

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
  32. Re: can we expect... by System.out.println() · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought the PlayStation was the "fat nerd's PlayStation"?

  33. Just an Idea by tsanth · · Score: 1

    What if the power company clocks the datastream by using the 50 Hz (IIRC) that AC power cycles at? Could one then screw up the connection for other people by feeding back aperiodic signals to the power grid?

    1. Re:Just an Idea by cmstremi · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's 60 Hertz in the US of A.

    2. Re:Just an Idea by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

      What if the power company clocks the datastream by using the 50 Hz (IIRC) that AC power cycles at?

      As someone else mentioned, its 60Hz in the USA (including Cincinnati), not 50Hz.

      Additionally, IF you were able to modulate the signals enough to overcome variations in power draw, without disturbing devices that expect a relatively steady voltage, you'd get a total theoretical bandwidth of (gasp!) 60Hz. Considering that modems surpassed that, oh, at their CONCEPTION, it hardly qualifies as broadband. I don't see people signing up for 50bps (or even 50,000bps) shared-pipe service in droves..

    3. Re:Just an Idea by calidoscope · · Score: 1
      As someone else mentioned, its 60Hz in the USA (including Cincinnati), not 50Hz.

      FWIW, Southern Cal Edison was running 50 Hz up until 1948. If I heard correctly, NYC finally got rid of the last vestiges of DC within the last couple of years.

      And in response to the parent poster - it would be a very bad idea to modulate the 60 Hz. One of the advantages of three phase power is that the power flow is constant in a balanced system - modulating the 60 Hz would create vibration problems with any large machinery (e.g. the generators).

      --
      A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
    4. Re:Just an Idea by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --From what little I know about power lines, they're not "clean" - this is why you should have a surge-protector / UPS powering your computer, to clean up the sine wave.

      My questions are:

      o How SECURE is this tech? Broadband over powerlines sounds like it could be *very* easily tapped / sniffed. [conspiracy-theory]

      o How many dropped packets / xmission errors are to be commonly expected with this tech? (How reliable is it)

      o Is it going to affect the power to my household appliances at all? (will it make lights flicker)

      o Does it support IPV6? (Not that *I'm* worried about it, just a question)

      o Can you have a choice of static / dynamic IPs with it?

      o What happens when THOUSANDS / millions of ppl are sending data over the powerlines? Does the end-user incoming data rate eventually drop, like with shared cable access?

      o Does it increase cancer probability??

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  34. BPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These guys are full of sales pitches. Penn Power and Light is the first BPL deployment in the US. IdaComm is the second, these guys barely make 3rd.

  35. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, HAM operating piece of shit.

  36. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL no that's the Xbox

  37. A report from Cincinatti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is pretty bad. I was using my electric toothbrush after I had my house wired for electric internet. I noticed this bad taste, and all of a sudden, I'd somehow downloaded some porn spam into my mouth. Yeecchhhhhh.

    1. Re:A report from Cincinatti by falzer · · Score: 1

      This is pretty bad. I was using my electric toothbrush after I had my house wired for electric internet. I noticed this bad taste, and all of a sudden, I'd somehow downloaded some porn spam into my mouth. Yeecchhhhhh.

      Thank goodness for you goatse.cx is down.

    2. Re:A report from Cincinatti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed this bad taste, and all of a sudden, I'd somehow downloaded some porn spam into my mouth.

      You think that white stuff giving you a bad taste in your mouth was just porn spam?

      Muhuhahaha!

  38. Not a great deal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cincinnati Bell migrating from 768/386 DSL @ $40/mo to 3Mb/768 at the same price.

    I fail to see how this $30 1Mb/1Mb broadband is a great thing.

    1. Re:Not a great deal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DSL has ranges limited to the power of the signal sent out by the DSLAM.

    2. Re:Not a great deal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      big difference between 768 and 3Mb. plus, DSL is prone to connection problems on teh phone line. plus i like it up teh sp0k3

  39. from what i have read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this will probably cause a major brownout around june of this year.

  40. I guess that proves it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marge Schott WAS really keeping Cincinnati back in the 19th century!

  41. Whole new online warfare by servicepack158 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This could lead to some interesting power surge attacks in the future to disrupt communications etc . I Like the speed and the price, but I don't know about plugging my nic into the outlet.

    1. Re:Whole new online warfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean as opposed to how it's currently done where a terrorist could theoretically create a power surge to damage the equipment anyways?

    2. Re:Whole new online warfare by leon.gandalf · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Even worse if you consider that you cannot use a Surge arrestor or suppressor as they BLOCK RF over power line signals. i.e intercoms or X10...

    3. Re:Whole new online warfare by servicepack158 · · Score: 1

      You can already have back up power (generator/ups) and have surge protectors for you power. I merely meant, you're having a more direct connection to the power from your nic card. It could really damage the equipment if not filtered properly.

  42. Bigger band on the market by sheetsda · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live just north of Cinci and the local DSL provider (Zoomtown) just bumped their customers up to 3/1 MbPS (something like $40 a month). Roadrunner cable (~$45 a month I believe) is also a big competitor in the area. Cool technology, but are they really going to get a big market share with cheap slow dial-up at $10 less a month and bigger band at $10-15 more? Seems to me they need to increase their speed to compete with broadband or lower their price to compete with dialup.

    1. Re:Bigger band on the market by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      ....or just fall right in the middle, for people who want more than dialup but don't have use for 3mbps downstream, which is a LOT of the market. It's a low-end broadband (always-on, decent speed) for less money than most broadband.

      Plus, I gather that it will be available just about anywhere you get power from Cinergy, which covers a lot of area that neither Zoomtown or Roadrunner reach.

  43. Holey Shiiiet... by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Dear god, I was just RTFA and noticed this little bit in there:
    Cinergy and Current also will use Current Technologies(TM) BPL equipment to implement important new services that will provide improved reliability and increased efficiency for Cinergy's utility subsidiaries and their customers. BPL technology can enable a variety of enhanced power distribution applications, including:

    * Automated outage detection and restoration confirmation

    * Remote monitoring and operation of switches and transformers

    * Remote capability to connect and disconnect electric service

    * More efficient demand-side management programs

    * Automated meter reading

    Am I to understand that they're going to be controlling their critical infrastructure over IP? WTF? WTF? Has nobody in their management structure considered the security risks inherent in that madness? Much less the certainty of brutal RF interference from (and to) Hams and Emergency Service? This brings me to ask a few critical questions here, if anybody can answer them please speak up:

    1: Could someone with a properly configured radio reciever monitor traffic over this system wirelessly?

    2: If it's possible to monitor signals with radio equipment, could you transit? Is it unreasonable to call this analagous to the power co. deciding they're going to switch all their equipment over a wireless network?

    1. Re:Holey Shiiiet... by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      *transmit. Jesus, the spelling troll makes an error. I'm just going to go crawl under a rock and die now.

    2. Re:Holey Shiiiet... by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

      Open transmissions is why they have things like SSL. I mean it's not like ethernet is untappable.

    3. Re:Holey Shiiiet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. We know the internet is not to be trusted with plaintext packets anyway.

      At least this is only a sniff attack, not a man-in-the-middle attack (it takes wayyyyyy to much power to alter one of these signals).

    4. Re:Holey Shiiiet... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If it takes so much power to alter them, why don't you need a huge machine to do the work on your end, to handle the power requirements? The only problem is that you are far away. However that is not insurmountable except for the effects of inverse square law. It WOULD take a significant amount of power if you're far away from the wire, but it's still not impossible.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Holey Shiiiet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah you could transit (sic) assuming you had an arc welder and were about two feet from the line!!!!

    6. Re:Holey Shiiiet... by Woody77 · · Score: 1

      They've been doing this in Europe for a while, however they've been doing it at very low power, at carefully selected, very low frequencies that aren't going to cause major communciations problems.

      They also use fairly decent encryption/authentication schemes.

    7. Re:Holey Shiiiet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2: If it's possible to monitor signals with radio equipment, could you transit?

      You could just snap something with a battery over the line someplace to induce a current in the wire. Take a lot less power to transmit that way, and even harder to trace back to you.

    8. Re:Holey Shiiiet... by anarxia · · Score: 1
      Cable has similar issues due to the sharing of the line. Cable fixed this with DOCSIS 1.1 that supports encryption. They can do the same and my guess is that they already do.
      1. You will pick up signals from the power line but the problem is what you do with them.
      2. The same applies to cable. What if I tap into my cable line and start my own channel?
      This is new technology and there will be issues initially, but at least give them some credit that they know what they are doing. They are the experts in those things and we are just guessing.
  44. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe you'd like to read more than the power company's own propoganda?

    http://www.computerweekly.com/Article127428.htm

    http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2003/07/08/

    As well as the report recently on /. about how Austria dropped this idea due to interfearance issues. (sorry, I don't have the link)

    Of course those that're looking to get your $29/mo are going to say it works!! ::Baaaaaa!:: ::Baaaaaa!::

  45. UPS boxes! by LuxFX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now all they need to do is invent a UPS box that can store 30 minutes of surfing for backup when the power goes out....

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  46. Does this mean... by objectboy · · Score: 1

    that I would be able to plug in anywhere on the grid and have access? How would all of this work from an 'account' stand point?

    --

    You are in a maze of twisty little pasages all alike.
  47. In the scottish trial by macnorth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    they could only get 500 meter from the substation. Any transformer between you and the substation. Ok for city broadband but not much use for rural.

  48. HF Interference by buddhaunderthetree · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can anyone in Cinci report an increase in HF interference?

    --
    "Technology.....the knack of so arranging the world that we don't have to experience it." Max Firsch
  49. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck the ham radio nerds. I want my 1mb downstream!

  50. Not the first time Cincinnati is ahead by martinde · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've had DSL since 1998. I believe we had one of the earlier successful, widespread DSL rollouts. (Before that I will say that there WAS a big void in broadband - ISDN was never a real option here.)

    Note that over the weekend Cincinnati Bell jumped residential broadband from 768kbs downstream to 3Mbit, without a rate increase! This is the second time they've significantly increased the bandwidth with no change in rates - the first time was just before the RoadRunner rollout. Long live competition!

    1. Re:Not the first time Cincinnati is ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's correct. I was the 2nd beta site for ADSL in Cincinnati and at the time they were doing it (1997) I believe the only other city in the US doing large scale successful ADSL deployment was Atlanta.

  51. Re: can we expect... by pclminion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    did you RTFA?

    Yes, but over here in our little corner of the universe we like to call "Rational Land," scientific "studies" conducted by for-profit organizations, especially when such studies appear to benefit said organizations, are considered highly suspect until corroborated by external researchers.

    But thanks for playing.

  52. Service by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 0, Redundant
    So, I'm curious about what their terms are like. Are they going to be like the cable companies and start kicking anybody who "is using an excessive amount of bandwidth", without defining 'excessive'?

    Am I going to be able to pay the 30/month and transfer data upstream AND downstream 24/7? Or am I going to pay 30/month and be bitched at and disconnected after I download a couple gigs?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  53. Re:And in other news...Riots! by SiO2 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Cincinnati is also famous for racial profiling and riots. Don't forget the riots.

    SiO2

  54. You insensitive clods by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny
    I just finished getting off the grid by putting in $15,000 of Solar Power!

    Oh well, I guess I will be selling excess bandwidth back to the power company along with any extra power.

    When do these winter clouds move out?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  55. Re: can we expect... by ignipotentis · · Score: 1

    As usual...

    did you RTFA?

    Do you know where you are?

    --
    Don't waste time... procrastinate now!
  56. Re: can we expect... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 2
    The interference this service causes on the amature bands is well documented at the ARRL [arrl.org] website.

    In other news, bread manufacturers are providing lots of evidence that the Atkins diet is crap.

    ARRL says it interferes. The power company says it doesn't. Duh. I'd like to see some objective studies on this. Amateur radio has just as much right to exist as anything else in the spectrum. And it's true that power lines in general are quite good at causing RF interference. But I have not yet seen any objective evidence that Broadband over Powerlines causes more interference than the existence of the power lines themselves. Maybe the studies are there - if they are, great. But I haven't seen any that aren't sponsored by either amateur radio groups or energy companies.

    --
    There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
  57. Re: can we expect... by quonsar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OR... It will interfere heavily with ham radio, which will complain, wail and moan to no avail. you sound pretty certain of yourself there with your "properly licensed" service and all, except that's about as solid as a fart in the wind. The FCC almost 10 years ago knuckled under to the New Improved GI Joe Walkie Talkie (cellular) industry, and drew a line across a chunk of public spectrum and said "Thou shalt listen here no more." They've approved an ignorant consumers nightmare called HDTV, the implementation of which has far less to do with HDTV than it does bulldozing certain spectrum into the control of those who hope to profit from selling "personal wireless services". you can no more count on your license remaining valid (or even useable in the HF bands) on the basis of the existence of either the past, or the FCC. I know hams have deluded themselves into thinking they shall overcome, but there are billions of dollars to be made, and your passion for HF radio will be painted as the outmoded, troublesome activities of a handful of eccentric hobbyists. Your interests will be portrayed by the media as quaint and evocative of simpler times. And "logical" voices will call for the removal of your "anachronistic" sorry asses from the path of progress. The FCC will act against the least financially endowed, or simply NOT respond to the interference complaints of those without corporate monies, and POOF. It HIGHLY more likely that ham radio enthusiasts will disappear from the HF bands than broadband providers. Sorry. I hate it, but if you think otherwise, you are seriously lacking in understanding of how money and the United States government interface.

  58. Re: can we expect... by dbc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let me tell you about how Part 15 certification *really* works. They found no problems because they didn't go looking for them. The only BPL trials so far have been: 1) very limited in area, 2) very limited in time, (1 year? Continuous? Hardee-har) 3) some of them on underground primaries, 4) they don't poll HF spectrum users to find out about interference.

    The BPL trials have winked on and off so fast that no interference complaints could be logged. It takes a *lot* of time to document an interference complaint so that it is sufficient for an FCC filing.

    The Part 15 industry is notorious for submitting "lab queens" to the FCC for certification. Especially the Part 15 devices that run on house wiring and over power lines... they only *model* the power lines, and the models are pathetically simple-minded -- the better to pass Part 15.

    Part 15 is a cesspool of spectrum mismanagement and BPL is the biggest turd ever. What galls me is that the FCC should be playing honest broker here, but instead they are cheerleading a questionable technology.

  59. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.hamtronics.com/forest_fire.htm

    Although this story refers to the 2m band it just shows that amateur radio communication is far from being useless.

  60. I'm from California by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 4, Funny

    PG&E has enough trouble delivering electricity over the power lines, let alone internet access.

    Speaking of which, wasn't Cincinnati one of the cities that got hit by the east coast blackout?

    1. Re:I'm from California by DavidS · · Score: 1

      Nope... the power in Cincinnati is pretty reliable actually.

      dks

    2. Re:I'm from California by ProfanityHead · · Score: 0

      Nup, no blackout here last summer.

    3. Re:I'm from California by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      Nope, the power stayed on here the whole time. The blackout was mainly north-east of here. Part of Columbus was affected, but only a small portion.

    4. Re:I'm from California by rosie_bhjp · · Score: 3, Informative

      no, Cinci was not involved. Thee blackout hit parts as far south as ~100 miles north of Cincinnati and it was a temporary (1-3 hrs) kinda thing.

      I don't have much love for monopolies but Cinergy does seem to do a pretty good job of keeping the lights on.

      --
      A radio maverick jumps to internet only. The Future of Rock n Roll
    5. Re:I'm from California by Peeet · · Score: 1

      Cinergy is great, I'm in cincy and our house is 2,300 dollars in the hole as far as bills that we owe them and they haven't cut us off for the past 4 months. People say it's because of laws preventing loss of heating and electric during the winter, but I think it's just because they are nice.

      BTW, anyone else noticed it has been getting warm here in Cincy? I think spring is on it's way and I ca-**NO CARRIER**

  61. Ham radio == Dinosaur by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    yes, I know FEMA depends on it. Yes, I know it's valuable in emergencies. Two points:

    1) if there's an emergency, the power's probably out, and ham will work anyway. If you want to practice, do what amateur astronomers do and go out in the country where I can guarantee they won't have this. It's nice to get out of the city anyway.
    2) If ham radio dies, there will be something to replace it in your life. Most of the longtime computer users I knew where I grew up got into it in the Altair days as an extension of ham radio. If you don't want something different, well, I knew a lot of people that loved to ride 3-wheeled ATVs, and hated quads, but they got used to them. the times they are a-changin' and all that shit.

    Don't drag down progress by clinging to an anachronism. Please.

    1. Re:Ham radio == Dinosaur by MBCook · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You, Sir, are sadly misinformed.

      As to your first point, yes ham radio would work once the power was out (and BPL was off as it would be), but if you force people to go out to the middle of nowhere to practice, THEY WON'T. Besides which, one of the great points of BPL is that it runs over powerlines so it can be run sold to houses out in the middle of no where, because they're on the power grid. So you couldn't go out into the country unless you decide to trek a few miles into the middle of farmers fields where you won't be near a power line.

      Yes, something will replace ham radio if it dies, but that doesn't make it OK to kill ham radio. If humans die, a new dominate speciese will probably appear after a few million years, does that mean we should kill all humans? After all, only a few species want/depend on humans. For many others, humans are "in the way" of their "progress". Same logic, just a rediculous example.

      Also, how are riding 3-wheeled ATVs and riding 4-wheeled ATVs mutually exclusive? Nationwide deployment of BPL threatens to kill ham radio, but your friends can still ride a 3-wheeled ATV.

      Ham radio does more than just FEMA stuff. Hams help with parades, marathons, races, triathalons, storm chasing, teaching electronic and radio theory to new people, providing a new and interesting way to communicate, all sorts of research, etc. Ham radio fosters good will with other countries. You can talk to other countries, meet interesting people, etc. In some remote areas (like in some island chains) ham radio can be a major source of interisland communication.

      How would you like it if ATVs were banned from being used and sold because of their environmental impact? Why make the environment suffer for your little hobby. You could still ride bikes, you could switch to that. Quit holding back environmental progress by clining to some pointless hobby that doesn't even serve the community (like ham radio does)?

      Don't drag down my hobby just because you don't care, please.

      PS: All of this is ignoring that fact that my ham radio frequencies are protected BY LAW and that the power companys CAN NOT interfer with them. We're not just some group saying "don't kill our hobby", our hobby is legally protected.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Ham radio == Dinosaur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The frequencies are not only used by ham radio operators. I can think of two other things... Radio controlled airplanes and cars and pagers. I will have to look at what else is allocated to the 5Mhz - 80 MHz band.

    3. Re:Ham radio == Dinosaur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should qualify this first, I race motorcycles, and have since I was 9 years old I am 33 now. I am recovering from a broken knee from last season right now. I also raced carts, at the track I used to be amazed with the guys on their 3 wheelers, but I never rode one or ownded one till last year, A neighbor gave me one the shift fork had jumped on so I quickly fixed it and took it for a ride, I have a 30 acre field to play in so off I went....After 10 minutes I decided it was the god awful scarriest thing I have ever rode and promptly sold it lest one of my kids decide to ride it, SCARRY SHIT, and this coming from someone that had rode "monkey" in sidecar racing

    4. Re:Ham radio == Dinosaur by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I think ham is pretty cool, but you have to look at some assorted issues which are attached. Any one thing ham can do, something else can do better. Some things, almost nothing else can do (such as communicate with people far away when all physical lines are severed, which only radio and radio networks (iridium, if it had (has?) point to point radio communications)) Holy fuck was that nested far enough? I swear next time I'll take the time to make the sentence come out in English.

      Anyway the internet does the thing for people where they can talk to people in other countries for free, and they can have video, too. You can use other kinds of radio for the public events.

      Lots of recreational vehicles ARE being banned from being used and sold because of their environmental impact. Namely, all two stroke watercraft will be illegal by... 2008? By EPA regulation. They're going to have to be converted to four stroke or pulled out of the water. I think some oil injected two strokes are exempt but most of them have problems, and if the oil injection system fails the motor will seize quickly, usually scoring cylinders in the process, which in turn ends up costing a lot of money, so people usually just run them on premix, which is illegal at least in California. (You're not allowed to defeat environmental protection devices.) And you're not allowed to ride personal watercraft on many, many waterways now for assorted environmental reasons (water pollution, and impact and sound-related hazards to aquatic life.)

      Ham radio is cool. The idea of being able to build a radio with which you can speak to people in other countries is fantastic. But, there are valid replacements. The only real defense is the hobby issue, and I'm not sure that's going to end up being sufficient. Generally speaking it's money that speaks the loudest.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Ham radio == Dinosaur by Katz_is_a_moron · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you knew anything about HF, you would know it propagates via the ionosphere thousands of miles away from it's source.

      So even if the power was out say, in Denver, you would still be able to hear interference from a BPL system in NY, where the power may still be on.

      Same argument for practicing "out in the country". If BPL became widespread, there would be interference everywhere regardless of whether the power was on or not.

    6. Re:Ham radio == Dinosaur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hams are being vocal before it happens. Once it's in place, I foresee riots by the TV addicts who can no longer watch their favorite shows (or anything else). And the police won't be able to do much about the rioting, because their radio networks will be jammed also.

      But the script kiddies will have a field day using all that bandwidth!

    7. Re:Ham radio == Dinosaur by Dravik · · Score: 1

      This anachronism is crictical to military communications. The military uses the same wavelengths. The hams problem will be the militarys problem.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    8. Re:Ham radio == Dinosaur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you knew anything about RF, you would know the radiated signal levels that BPL will generate will barely be detectable across the street from the power lines...

    9. Re:Ham radio == Dinosaur by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      You have absolutely no idea how ridiculous that sounds. The actual amount of spectrum dedicated to ham radio is so tiny, it makes no sense to go out of one's way to crush it. Anyway, eliminating amateur bands isn't going to solve the interference issues with BPL. There will still be lots of amplified two-way set-ups and repeaters in use by municipal organizations or private companies.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    10. Re:Ham radio == Dinosaur by youknowmewell · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes, something will replace ham radio if it dies, but that doesn't make it OK to kill ham radio. If humans die, a new dominate speciese will probably appear after a few million years, does that mean we should kill all humans? After all, only a few species want/depend on humans. For many others, humans are "in the way" of their "progress". Same logic, just a rediculous example.

      This is probably the lamest example to defend HAMS that I have ever seen. Stop being so melodramatic. It's not the end of the world if the HAM dies. You'll find a new hobby, I promise.

      Ham radio does more than just FEMA stuff. Hams help with parades, marathons, races, triathalons, storm chasing, teaching electronic and radio theory to new people, providing a new and interesting way to communicate, all sorts of research, etc. Ham radio fosters good will with other countries. You can talk to other countries, meet interesting people, etc. In some remote areas (like in some island chains) ham radio can be a major source of interisland communication.

      Well great, all of those terribly important examples of HAM use really hit hard. But I can do all of that AND MORE with say, cell phones and internet access. "Parades, marathons, races, triathalons, storm chasing, teaching electronic..." All can be done with cells. The only one I have any doubt with is storm chasing as I don't know what sort of interference an electrically charged cloud has on cell phones.

      There are even better and truly new ways to communicate other than with Ham. How about VoIP? Maybe a little instant messaging with video on the side?

      The internet is also a great olive branch to the world. And I'm sure you can find someone from the Christmas Islands to talk to on the internet.

      How would you like it if ATVs were banned from being used and sold because of their environmental impact? Why make the environment suffer for your little hobby. You could still ride bikes, you could switch to that. Quit holding back environmental progress by clining to some pointless hobby that doesn't even serve the community (like ham radio does)?

      As has been pointed out, there are some different motor vehicles that are being banned. Tough luck, right?

      Don't drag down my hobby just because you don't care, please.

      Please don't retard progress for the sake of your hobby, please.

      PS: All of this is ignoring that fact that my ham radio frequencies are protected BY LAW and that the power companys CAN NOT interfer with them. We're not just some group saying "don't kill our hobby", our hobby is legally protected.

      We'll see what legal wrangling will be done with this situation.

      Although you make some valid points, your attempt to sensationalize them only took away from the arguments you posed. The only legs you have to stand on are the laws protecting Ham communication and that "teaching radio theory" argument. All the others are just fluffy filler to make your arguments seem more important.

    11. Re:Ham radio == Dinosaur by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Any one thing ham can do, something else can do better.

      You've got to be kidding me, right?

      Hams have been at the forefront of some of the biggest technilogical advances in communications over the last century.

      Perhaps you've heard of Phil Karn, also known as KA9Q? He is one of the larger contributers to the development of the Internet and other computer communications technologies. While it was still ARPANET we were using his TCP/IP stack. He and many other hams around the world have contributed directly and indirectly to the technology you take for granted every day. Many of the people on that list who contributed to the advancment of communication technology drew upon their experience as hams.

      Anyway the internet does the thing for people where they can talk to people in other countries for free, and they can have video, too.

      (Patented Sarcasm Mode) You talk to people in other countries for free using the internet? I pay my ISP for the privilege. You must have a pretty sweet deal.

      I paid for my ham radio once. I paid a small fee to take my ham test. A year's worth of internet access costs more than the both of them combined.

      And we all know that hams never send video.(/Patented Sarcasm Mode)

      As many other people have pointed out in this forum, it isn't just the merit of ham radio in question. There are also non-ham communications issues, and one simple question that remains unanswered:

      Why allow so much spectrum to be lost to "harmful interference" when it doesn't have to be?

      Ham radio is cool. The idea of being able to build a radio with which you can speak to people in other countries is fantastic. But, there are valid replacements. The only real defense is the hobby issue, and I'm not sure that's going to end up being sufficient. Generally speaking it's money that speaks the loudest.

      What valid replacement is there for the knowledge and experience gained by hams as they progress in their 'hobby'?

      What valid replacement is there for all of the skilled electronic/communication technicians that will no longer exist because their 'hobby' is depleted?

      Amateur radio got me interested in electronics. It wasn't the other way around.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    12. Re:Ham radio == Dinosaur by ACorvus · · Score: 1

      Rubbish. The wires will form huge antennas - and even a few watts can be heard on other continents in this frequency range.

      --
      -- Sig Sig Sputnik
  62. Available Ethernet over Power lines... by whoinow · · Score: 1

    I would suppose you need a special modem designed for the internet pipe coming from the power co. BUT what are the possibilities with the currently available Ethernet over Home Power Adaptors? Could you pick up signal from the power co? Would the adaptor and the power company interfere? I don't know the specifications of either technology so this is why I ask. It would be interest to go to CompUSA and get $60 adaptor and have 1mb u/d for free....

    1. Re:Available Ethernet over Power lines... by leon.gandalf · · Score: 1

      As far as I know (at least for cable) Your 'modem' is identified my its MAC address. And MAC address not registered is ignored. As far as RF on those two adapter types.... ummmm errr dunno....

  63. Re:The effects of this on telcos and cable compani by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, this isn't a "first in the nation", even though the article claims it is. We've had BPL in Manassas for a few months now. I'm pretty sure I've also heard about a city in Florida and somewhere out west, but I'm too lazy too search Google for them.

    On the impact to Telcos, Qwest has announced "naked" DSL where you don't need to purchase dial-tone to get DSL and one of the reasons they cited for packaging it that way was to compete with BPL.

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  64. Re: can we expect... by alamut · · Score: 1

    As another poster mentioned, ham radio operators (of which i am one [not fat! not old!]) are not the only services that are licensed to use the HF bands.

    The federal government is still a big user, as well as state and local services. Broadcasting is still done in the band - its one of the only media forms that can reliably reach en masse into third-world countries.

    this interference causing technology isn't the best available. there'd be much more use gained by opening up more bandwidth for 802.11-type services. i'd rather see infrastructure capital go into the best technology possible.

  65. If nothing... by nathanhart · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If nothing it will at least put some pressue onto the DSL and Cable proivders (quite possably Satalite aswell) and maybe make them lower their rates or push even more speed out of their lines to keep their customer from hopping onto this for the higher upload. Also should be an interesting read of their AUP to see if they allow people to run personal web servers on their connections or not.

    --
    GeekLeak.com - Silly name, serious geeks
  66. Re: can we expect... by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

    "Did you RTFA?" You must be new here. Moving on, moving on.

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

  67. Re: can we expect... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hmmm...A long legal battle between amateur radio operators and a power company. Can I bet on it?

    -B

  68. Re: can we expect... by quonsar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the utility has found no problem with radio wave interference and microsoft has found no fundamental security weaknesses in its products. and enron saw no problem with inventing intangible investments. bush found no reason to think saddam wouldn't make a mushroom cloud out of us any day. and i have a marvelous over-water vehicular conveyance device located in brooklyn i can let you have for a pittance. and i see no problem giving you a quit-claim deed to it.

  69. Now it all makes sense... by ProfanityHead · · Score: 1, Informative

    I live in Cincy and have the phone company's dsl service (very good service I might add). Last couple weeks they've been upgrading everyone to 3mb/1mb and dropped the price a bit. Nice to see some competition stirring up the pot now. Good news on an otherwise sad day here in Cincinnati. Marge Schott passed away. :(

  70. Cable lines are shielded. by MenTaLguY · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cable lines are shielded (COAX); power lines aren't (and can't be, really, at those power levels).

    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
  71. So.... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I buy a UPS, will it function as a transparant cache?

  72. This is an AMAZING thing to happen by ActionAL · · Score: 1

    I think this is an AMAZING thing to happen because power outlet internet access would be the most easily accessible form for people to connect to.

    And what if the power company next puts mega wireless access points on top of their power poles?

    We really need to get an entire city running internet wirelessly.

  73. Re: can we expect... by shaka999 · · Score: 1

    What moron put this as flamebait? If you can't debate something then try and squash it....

    --
    One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
  74. However by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In this situation, the "said organization" only benefits if the service is successful. It'll only be successful if interference is not a major problem. Knee-jerk anti-corporate thoughts aside, I think we're still squarely in "Rational Land."

    1. Re:However by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      " In this situation, the "said organization" only benefits if the service is successful. It'll only be successful if interference is not a major problem. Knee-jerk anti-corporate thoughts aside, I think we're still squarely in "Rational Land.""

      Who modded this "Insightful"?

      Interference may not be a problem for YOU, it certainly is for the millions of listeners to shortwave broadcasts.

    2. Re:However by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      You miss his point. If ham radio operators can destroy a systems' effectiveness then said system will not be successful, hence it's eventual death.

    3. Re:However by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      OK, I misread that statement. However, ham radio has a long history of interfering with local broadcast and TV reception when receivers are badly designed. When hams interfere with BPL they will be blamed and shutdown so that the system can be successful after all.

  75. Big Government by KrackHouse · · Score: 1

    The government created the Internet in America. Why shouldn't it be treated like any other large piece of infrastructure that makes life better for all citizens? The interstate highway system for instance. The damage caused by greedy gatekeepers to the Internet results in the "digital divide" which is just anti democratic IMO.

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
  76. Re:The effects of this on telcos and cable compani by prostoalex · · Score: 1

    But Qwest wants $32, while in bundle with home package the same DSL costs $27.

    Besides, only in some areas Qwest offers 1.5 Mbps downlink, in most markets its 256/512 at most. Plus they are not available where I live, so if BPL came around I'd be in line to sign up anyway.

  77. Re: can we expect... by excaliber19 · · Score: 1

    /me runs to get a HAM radio ;)

  78. In this case... by bluprint · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    Tim Barhorst, an information technology consultant in Hyde Park who has been using the technology for a year, said he's been impressed. "I find it's very convenient," he said, noting that he can set up his computer anywhere there's an electric outlet.

    So, it looks like you can connect with your own account anywhere.

    --
    A modern day witchhunt.
  79. Re:The Designated Hitler rule by catbutt · · Score: 1

    Too late, she died today.

  80. HAM vs. BPL by rodgster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The majority often times rules. Or at least lately those with the most money make the rules/laws.

    I think it is fair to say that the vast majority of computer/internet users would side with $30/month symmetrical 1Mbps.

    Nothing personal and I'm not trying to offend anyone.

    --
    Who will guard the guards?
    1. Re:HAM vs. BPL by amacleod98 · · Score: 1

      It is a sad fact that what you say is true.

  81. You are an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Brownsville, Texas, an absolute shithole where everything gets to last. And yet I'm only paying $30 for 3mbps down and 384kbps up with Road Runner. I don't know where you get this loco weed hallucination that cable upload costs a shitload if you want it over 128kbps.

    1. Re:You are an idiot. by dewhite · · Score: 1

      He's probably a cox or shaw customer. When I was using cable internet to host I had to pay 200 dollars a month for 2mbit down and 512kbit up. I've since gone to a 4mbit sync colo facility for $90/month and 1mb/128k DSL for $30 a month in my home.

      --
      -dewhite
  82. Hey Taco! by zaren · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Wonder what it'll cost to get a line run up to Ann Arbor / Ypsi from Cincy? :)

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
  83. Things likely not mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't pump a high speed signal through transformers like that, (transformers are tuned to a specific frequency domain), so anyone think that their running the signal on a seperate line on the poles until they get to the transformer to your house or aparment. Since the signal only travels a few blocks at best, there would be a signifigantly smaller amount of interference than everyone thinks.

  84. Ice Cream by moultano · · Score: 1

    You forgot the absolutely fantastic ice cream! If any of you are ever in town, stop by Greater's or Aglamesis. Some of the best ice cream you will ever have

    1. Re:Ice Cream by joggle · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if it is the best, but Aglamesis really does have great, old-fashioned ice cream. I haven't been to Cinci in a while, but that ice cream really is memorable, although I miss Skyline and that other chilli restaurant even more.

  85. And you have no brain to think with... by deck · · Score: 1

    Some things still exist even if they are anachronistic. There are some powerful players in the amature radio arena who desire to keep the service. By your reasoning, we should have no public parks, public roads, or other public properties as monied intrest have long salivated to turn these over to themselves.

    1. Re:And you have no brain to think with... by quonsar · · Score: 1

      firstly, this wasn't in any way shape or form, intended to be flamebait. maybe i was a little strident, i am not a licensed radio amateur but have always loved radio and have several freinds who are hams. my screed above is more meant to reflect my disgust with the FCC's actions this last decade or so than to incite hams to flames. i just don't think there's a chance in hell of stopping this snowball as it rolls downhill.

    2. Re:And you have no brain to think with... by quonsar · · Score: 3, Funny

      you may also climb off your asspole and note that the use of quote marks around anachronistic was intentional.

  86. Re: can we expect... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

    Not really a 'Power Company'. Just a weasely subdivision of a power company that's gonna be trying to get the linemen and regular joes within the power company to now maintain this twinky service that 1-4% of their customers are using.

    --
    ---
  87. Re: can we expect... by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If there is truly a conflict, I hope the hams can be given some other chunk of spectrum to operate with, because the number of people interested in accessing the Internet truly dwarfs the number interested in ham radio. I do have some sympathy for "we were here first" but at some point it would simply be a tyranny of the minority.

  88. Ahead of the times reference by Facekhan · · Score: 1

    "When the end of the world comes, I want to be in Cincinnati because it's always twenty years behind the times."- Attributed to Mark Twain

    Good to see that on issues of technology and consumer choice they are gaining some ground cause they always seem to have those itsy bitsy riots when they oppress minorities

  89. Re: can we expect... by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I wish they'd make the hams fall under part 15 (ie THEY can't interfere with everything else) with a provision that they can crank it up in emergency situations or periodic emergency tests.

    I remember when I was a kid we lived near a ham with a rig that was powerful enough that if the amp was turned on to our stereo speakers we'd pick him up. Didn't even need to turn on a tuner. He was just an ass about it and the FCC didn't give a damn (all they care about is fining Howard Stern when he swears).

    And while there are some real uses for hams (emergencies, etc.) I don't think I've ever heard a ham on any of my scanners or shortwaves that wasn't talking about 1) the weather or 2) their radio equipment.

  90. yah, uhm by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 1, Informative

    Les Nessman was the nerd.

    Venus Flytrap was the black guy, and he was cool as hell.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
    1. Re:yah, uhm by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Don't forget Johnny Fever!!

      It is such a shame that they can't show the original shows on air, or at least put them on DVD. My old VHS copies are wearing out. Apparently, they want to charge now a FORTUNE for the original music they played in the background on the show...hence the reruns they tried to play on Nick at night had 'generic' music dubbed in which sucked.

      I read that's why the show was originally done on video tape instead of film. Back then, apparently if done on tape...they legally bypassed having to pay so much for the rights to use the real music of the time on the show. Apparently, this loophole has been closed, hence the dirth of WKRP for us to see. I hope they can resolve this...before the old stock disappears..I've heard that original versions of the show are already hard to find...only the cut up syndicated ones.

      I always preferred Bailey over Jennifer....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  91. Pretty soon.. by sl0wp0is0n · · Score: 1

    you'll have digital telephones using the power lines too... Now tell me, how the @^$# do you call PG&E, when you have a power outage? :p

    --
    My other dog is a Wienerschnitzel.
  92. Now all we need is Power Over Cable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then we can be free of the tyranny of the power company!!!

  93. Internet monopolies by LaissezFaire · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Yesterday the big excitement was about "Cities Building Own Fiber Networks." Many of the comments there were favorable -- this was a good monopoly, showed the problems of the "last mile," etc.

    You don't have to go back very far in slashdot to find articles about DSL, or wireless, either. What this tells me is that there is no need to use government monoploy power over any high-speed Internet ventures. Power companies are offering high-speed Internet access because they believe they can make a profit at it. Other companies (cable, DSL, satellite) think they have the best way.

    The good news for us: We get to sit back and enjoy high-speed Internet at better availability and prices, and with no government interference. All thanks to the folks that brought you the free market!

  94. In my neck of the woods by wildsurf · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's a project underway in my community to replace the septic tanks with something more modern.

    I keep suggesting that we do a wireless sewer, but no one ever listens.

    Then again, I wonder if sewer gas conducts electricity? Could be onto something... But seriously, we may very well be laying down fiber optic cable alongside the sewer as it's installed. Just as long as both pipes end up with enough bandwidth...

    --
    Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  95. More Competition is Good by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    Whatever the turnout from this is (technically speaking that is), I think it's a good thing creating a little extra competition for the big boys. Whereas they were able to pretty much keep any other DSL company from joining the game, all of a sudden there is a new broadband provider to make these established DSL fellas make sure they have competitive pricing and decent customer service. That's definitely a good thing and I'm looking forward to the competitive benefits. Now to see how all this VoIP works out...

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  96. Firefighters by the same logic. by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    By the same logic, let the firefighters sit at home 24/7 until there's a fire, THEN go train, THEN go to the firestation, THEN go to the fire . . .

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  97. I wish DSL price will be dropping ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT(No Text)

  98. Power lines can be shielded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you remember your physics?

    They can be inductivly shielded. AC current travels over two lines with opposite current flow in each line (and the current in each line occilates).

    To shield, simply form one wire into an insulated tube and run the other through it.

    I'm not sure what to use for insulation though.

    1. Re:Power lines can be shielded. by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      It certainly is possible to shield the electricity grid. (Just hard, the insulation will need to be far better than a normal coax cable)
      The problem is that the current grid isn't and will radiate like hell when frequencies much higher than 50 or 60 Hertz are used on it.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:Power lines can be shielded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The diameter of the insulation required would be measured in feet.

    3. Re:Power lines can be shielded. by ACorvus · · Score: 1

      Feet? I don't think so. Transmitting Coax that will take 2,500V RMS is only about 1/2" diameter. This is assuming the distribution isn't going to over anything but local 110/220V circuits, with fibre to the substations (which I assume is how it works).

      14,400 (or whatever the US uses for the next step up) could probably be carried with a slightly larger diameter, say 1.5-2". I think the buried cables are already "sheathed" with steel wire for durability anyway. An extra wrap of Al or Cu would be easy.

      --
      -- Sig Sig Sputnik
    4. Re:Power lines can be shielded. by tiger99 · · Score: 1
      But you could not easily screen domestic installations, for example, without ripping the buildings apart (partially at least) to get at the old wiring, and put in the new. There are completely impossible problems with light fittings, some appliances, etc, and the cable screens would need to be continuous everywhere, including at switchgear, transformers, etc.

      As someone who has to design things to meet various EMC regulations, including FCC, I know that this is impossible, and this service is in fact illegal.

    5. Re:Power lines can be shielded. by ACorvus · · Score: 1

      I agree - once you get into the home, the costs of actually not causing terrible interference would outbalance any savings on infrastructure.

      It's just a bad idea, full stop.

      --
      -- Sig Sig Sputnik
  99. Oh the drama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boyz and their drama...

  100. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so that means you have an x-box

  101. Forgot to press AC button. How funny. by lokedhs · · Score: 1
    Oops. :-) I forgot to click the AC checkbox. :-) If someone isn't going to mod me up or down down I'd be amazed.

    You get what you deserve, I guess.

    Oh, and the things I said are true.

  102. Re: can we expect... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    The problem is, the only people who give a shit are amateur radio groups, and energy companies. Who else is going to lay down the moolah?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  103. Well, that's true, but for a reason... by LandGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hams object, not because it's a good and valid method of delivering bits, but because it interferes with emergency communications.

    There's lots of ways to get good Internet feeds to folks; just look at what Robert X. Cringely has done with 802.11b. Look in the archives of his columns at www.pbs.org and see there are untapped alternatives.

    To understand why we're concerned, go switch your hi-fi to AM, tune to a vacant spot between stations, and turn up the volume about half way. Then, try to have a phone conversation over a bad cellular connection with your ear six inches from the speakers, and you will still have an easier time communicating than hams will when we experience the 16 db over S9 interference already demonstrated by BPL.

    I will make a small wager with you, shaka999. If you live within North America, I'll wager your state's or province's emergency plan counts on hams. So does your county's emergency plan, and your city's.

    You see, hams _practice_ at getting data through emergency conditions. We do it at our expense, with equipment we buy, build and maintain ourselves, without government funds.

    There's even a subsection of every national ham organization dedicated to emergency services. Yeah, I belong to one, and was out in the last ice storm, two months ago, delivering nurses to the local hospital because the roads were otherwise impassible, and the locals had already overloaded the cellular network to the point where a fast busy tone or "All Circuits Busy" signal was as likely as dial tone.

    BPL threatens the entire ability to function on the frequencies needed the most for long-range communications, the HF bands. If this interfered with TV (VHF and UHF), well, everyone would kvetch, but instead the power companies have designed these systems to use HF (aka shortwave) frequencies.

    Long range radio relies on HF, because it takes those lower frequencies to effectively bounce off the inner layer(s) of the ionosphere. Higher frequencies (VHF, UHF, SHF, microwave) just zip right through the F, F1 & F2 layers, so we can't do bank shots to get a signal from Earthquakestan to Resourceland to let them know how many units of Type A to send.

    Satellite? Well, gee, that presumes the ground stations survived that quake/tornado/hurricane/typhoon, that the power didn't fail, and the phone lines to the earth station still work. Oh, yeah, and IF there's a free satellite channel for us, which NASA's problems have not made any easier.

    Now, America's three-quarters of a million hams are not alone here, as you make it seem. The NTIA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration), who you'd expect to be gung-ho over more bandwidth to previously underserved areas, and also FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), have gone on record to object. They document that BPL was a complete disaster, interference-wise, when tried in Japan. The Austrian trials are on hold because the power companies there were not able to rein in the interference.

    But, it's Politics with a Capital P; who is beholden to whom, and who bought whom.

    Now, you might say, 'well, if there's a disater, the power's down, right'? Not necessarily. BPL can cause interference for miles and miles, but if a hospital needs to call for blood, what's the power company supposed to do, shut down the entire grid?

    Besides, remember that hams buy their own gear to practice and learn with. If we can't use HF, well, no one will buy new HF gear, no one will learn the tricks of HF (which is _very_ different than the skills needed for the garden-variety, talk-around-town two meter and 70 cm band users), and no one will bother to keep the automated packet netowrks in service, the digital backbones of the ham world which move the vast majority of message traffic.

    Sometimes, _nothing_ but Morse ("the original digital") will get through, but with BPL jamming the HF spectrum, morse will become a dead letter.

    I mean, man, you can put a bra on Michael Powell, and yuk it up all you want (see URL) but, damnit, these changes will *kill* people.
    http://www.wweek.com/story.php?story=4858

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
    1. Re:Well, that's true, but for a reason... by pcmanjon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I live in Cincinnati and it's causing terrible interference in the HF bands, we can't hear -ANYTHING- now...

      I talked to our local HAM club and they said that there's nothing we can do about it legally... seems like this is already a lost battle

  104. Re: can we expect... by thedillybar · · Score: 1
    Do you have a scientific study conducted by ANY organization explaining how and what this Internet connection will interfere with?

    If so, please share. If not, you're not giving the FCC the credit they deserve for all of their hard work.

  105. Re: can we expect... by shaka999 · · Score: 1

    Well said. I'd moderate this up if I had any points.

    The number of people this could benefit far outweigh the number of Ham operators. Being kicked out for the sake of progess sucks but it is sometimes necessary.

    The emergency services argument doesn't hold much weight. If something hit a populated area the service could easily be shut off.

    --
    One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
  106. Slashdot Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I just love how people here at slashdot are so smart. They know about every virus that comes out and can set up a zillion services on a zillion different computer platforms. But, when it comes to actual networking they are a bunch of chowderheads with nothing to do but speculate and make jokes.

    I have run networks over the powerlines of companies for about 10 years now. First it was serial communications to control facilities (AC) and the like. This is nothing new. Nowadays many homeowners use power connects for their computers and have X10 stuff in their house for home automation as well. Cisco makes stuff for this. You guys are scared of it because you have not seen it. Once you see it then you'll be all into and pretend you were never the luddites that you are right now.

    The only real problems with this technology is the need for a frequency router to connect different phases of power together. Again, this has been for ten years as well. Next time you go into your companies network room (if they let you in there) go and look at the UPS. See if it has a box with a 9 pin dshell on it that is connected to a wall socket. Then go and look at the AC system. Then marvel over ancient technology that was under your noses for 10 years.

    Run away screaming now. The Outlets are alive.

    1. Re:Slashdot Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dude, just so you know - you're fucking AWESOME. You should give lessons on how to be cool and informed.

      Now please go back to your cock-gagging.

    2. Re:Slashdot Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those ten-year-old systems are not broadband though, are they? Surely people would have noticed if they were operating on radio frequencies already...

  107. Re: can we expect... by cft_128 · · Score: 1
    Yes, but over here in our little corner of the universe we like to call "Rational Land," scientific "studies" conducted by for-profit organizations, especially when such studies appear to benefit said organizations, are considered highly suspect until corroborated by external researchers.

    And with out other studies that contradict it we should assume that it is bull? You think that we should assume the worst and condemn a study that does not agree with your preconceived uncorroborated notions?

    If you have real evidence that disproves the study, feel free to educate the rest of us, but without that your comment was neither constructive, helpful nor insightful.

    --

    Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

  108. Re: can we expect... by Detritus · · Score: 4, Informative

    It isn't just amateur radio. Try ships at sea, aeronautical communications, police, fire, forestry, government, military, disaster services, broadcasting, and many others. Those services are allocated those frequencies by international treaty. They are not going to vacate their frequencies so that a few pr0n addicts can download photoshopped pictures of Sarah Michelle Gellar a little faster.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  109. Useless argument by Jzanu · · Score: 1

    FCC of US will do what is necessary according to its charter or equivalent directive goal set. Only genuine complaint founded in fact of experience with proof and isolated to this supposed interference as cause will end this service. Complaints are mixture of supposition and blunt misinformation if made in other circumstances. Nothing apart from those proved to be effected will change policy, such is necessary and just.

  110. The British Radio Amateur's Perspective by amacleod98 · · Score: 1

    The possiblity of the introduction of such services has long been a concern for radio users. Power Line Telecommunication (PLT) DOES cause interference in the HF bands. Radio Society of Great Britain: http://www.rsgb.org/emc/pltnew.htm

  111. Re: can we expect... by Alethes · · Score: 1

    But the fact is the amature radio service is a vital emergency service

    I would assume that if we were having to use ham radios for emergency communication, then people would be unable to get online anyway and interference becomes a non-issue. Besides the same could be said of internet communication and probably even moreso, since it's more widespread. Imagine if telephone lines caused interference with ham radios. Do you think that anybody other than those hobbyists would care?

    Don't get me wrong. I think ham radios are a worthwhile hobby and situations exist that make them a necessity, but I think internet communication is definitely a higher priority in this century.

  112. Re: can we expect... by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

    Did you ever consider the possibility you had a lousy stereo?

    Jeroen

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  113. City council? by joggle · · Score: 1

    I guess that would be nefarious, not famous. Doesn't Cinci have one of the least amount of parkland per capita out of any US city? Also, haven't they been plauged with scandels over the years?

    1. Re:City council? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, our biggest scandal is a city council that is so afraid of looking racist that they've let the self-appointed 'black leadership' convince them not to prosecute several dozen people from the downtown riots a while back. Some of the people getting away with rioting, dragged people out of their cars and beat them.

    2. Re:City council? by Cicero · · Score: 1

      Did you mean one of the US cities with the most amount of parkland per capita? 10 % of the total city land seems like a lot to me.

      The city counsel, both past and present, has been pretty inept though.

    3. Re:City council? by moultano · · Score: 1

      Not True about the parkland.

      City council on the other hand hasn't been very effective.

    4. Re:City council? by joggle · · Score: 1

      Maybe I was thinking funding. Is that it? (that is the amount of funding for the park services is really low) I have family in Cinci and they were complaining about something along those lines a while back.

  114. Re: can we expect... by cft_128 · · Score: 1
    Who else is going to lay down the moolah?

    FEMA could lay it down... they use the same frequencies and have the bucks and the authority to do something. The already filed comments saying it has the potential to interfere.

    I also believe that the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (part of the U.S. Department of Commerce) is doing their own study.

    --

    Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

  115. Re: can we expect... by pclminion · · Score: 3, Informative
    You think that we should assume the worst and condemn a study that does not agree with your preconceived uncorroborated notions?

    UNCORROBORATED? This is like asking for a study to see if people die when you shoot them! Wideband signals, when pushed through a long, unshielded wire, radiate. This is fact. Several very famous people in the 19th century figured this out.

    Next stupid question? Perhaps you'd like an experiment to see if water freezes when you cool it?

  116. This sounds cool! by sl0wp0is0n · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess the biggest factor playing in favor of this technology is that power lines are ubiquitous. I don't call the ISP and fret at the usual "Sorry, this facility is not available in your area", anymore. Hell! It better be available. This can be a big advantage. Almost everywhere you go, you have power. So, you have potential for internet connectivity. No more worrying about whether that place will have an RJ11 or RJ45 jacks or 802.11. I'm really concerned about the security though. So, your next bank transaction is going through that big ugly power transformer sitting a few meters away from your house. How does that make you feel? I mean power lines are easily accessible and so I guess easier to tap into. On the positive side, there are some cools things that may happen. I would assume soon we'll have computers with no ethernet ports. Just plug in the power cable and that's all you need for power as well as network connectivity. Or, the gadgets at home might talk to each other using the power line they are anyways connected to.

    --
    My other dog is a Wienerschnitzel.
    1. Re:This sounds cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, have you never heard of this great idea called "encryption"?

      you might want to look it up.

      dumbass.

    2. Re:This sounds cool! by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Your bank transactions are already going through either your tappable phone line or your tappable cable box. Just use application-level encryption (SSL), which they should be using anyway. As it becomes easier to get wired in general, it's inevitably going to become easier to get wired secretly and/or without permission. Wifi is an extreme example of this, but the technology and users are already adapting.

      For that matter, it might be harder to tap into BPL, because you don't die when you fuck up splicing a coax or telephone line.

  117. New? by EyelessFade · · Score: 1

    Finally, my town gets AHEAD of the times, for once. You realy have slow tech in the US! Germany have had this for several years, and here in Norway we have had it for almost 2 years already. There is absolutly nothing new about it. Pleace wake me up when I can play UT with the man eating mars aliens ;)

    1. Re:New? by EyelessFade · · Score: 1

      arg! hate the stripping of posts, oh well

  118. Cincinnati isn't a good test... by abbamouse · · Score: 1

    ...since they have a habit of censoring just about everything under the sun.

    The C stands for Censorship. After all of this, what's left to justify broadband? :)

    --
    Make cheese not war 8:)
    1. Re:Cincinnati isn't a good test... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That state is weird. Larry Flynt, Maplethorpe and the most lax laws on marijuana cultivation/possession in the country (after alaska).

      3 ounces of mary jane in Ohio gets you a 100$ fine. Same with growing it. In CA growing 1 plant gets you 16 months in the slammer.

    2. Re:Cincinnati isn't a good test... by rosie_bhjp · · Score: 1

      That marijuana law has its upside and downside. Most cops really wouldn;t do anything about possession before necause the penalty was too severe. The cops weren't going to send everyone to jail for smoking a little grass so they would just "confiscate" it and send you on your way. Now they don't hesitate to cite you for it because $100 is no big deal, right?

      But, it does keep that asshole cop from being a perv to little girls or something because he can't hold that drug charge over their heads.

      Also, the statistics are gonna come out and they will probably show a massive increase for this offense which of course will be fuel for the fire of the right wing protectors of our own best interests.

      --
      A radio maverick jumps to internet only. The Future of Rock n Roll
    3. Re:Cincinnati isn't a good test... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be from the left coast. You have envied our power supply. And now you can envy our broadband. Suck on that for a while.

    4. Re:Cincinnati isn't a good test... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience in some counties you lose your driver's license for possession. I know this especailly to be true in clermont county.

  119. In Cincinnati by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

    There are already two competing companies, Time Warner (i.e. cable) and Zoomtown with DSL. This will make things interesting. The price for cable is $40.00 a month with downlstream _advertised_ around 2Mbps and upstream much lower than 1Mbps. I would switch to pay $10 less, it would ammount to $120 a year!

  120. MY only questions by Tarrek · · Score: 1

    So...

    How's the rent, and are there lots of restaurants?

    =)

    1. Re:MY only questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They won't like you. You have an arab name.

    2. Re:MY only questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rent in the Greater Cincinnati area compared to just about any larger city is terrific. What would cost you a month's rent in the D.C. area would get you around three months in a bigger apartment in Cincy.

      There's tons of restaurants. Something about this area. I live in Lexington, KY currently where we have the most restaurants per capita in the United States. Cincinnati is the same way. Good chili and good barbeque to name a couple staples. Some spots I'd recommend:

      The Maisonette (four star restaurant and worth every twenty spot)
      The Precinct (awesome, awesome steak)
      Pompilio's (small Italian diner across the river in KY; a scene from "Rain Man" was filmed there)
      Skyline Chili
      Montgomery Inn (go to the original in Montgomery)
      La Rosa's
      Rookwood Pottery
      Old Spaghetti Factory
      The Celestial
      Ming Garden (everything is good, *everything*)
      Sorrento's
      Sturkey's
      The Heritage

  121. Re: can we expect... by LordHunter317 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amateur radio has just as much right to exist as anything else in the spectrum.Actually, by law, Amateur Radio has more right to exist in the spectrum in question that broadband over power. Sorry. Not all portions of the EM spectrum are equally free in the US.

  122. Re: can we expect... by DF5JT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    YOU are the minority. There are people on this planet OUTSIDE the USA, do you know that? There are BILLIONS of people who are not interested in your cheap broadBAND access, but they certainly are interested in broadCAST access.

    BPL is RF pollution of the worst kind. It does NOT stop at your borders, quite on the contrary. It makes it impossible for millions of people all over the world to listen to a shortwave transistor radio, to get information, to be entertained and to connect with others.

    BPL uses the entire shortwave spectrum and creates a noise floor that can be heard all over the world (Ever heard of shortwave propagation? Ever heard what BPL sound like? I guess not.). With your snotty narrowminded attitude you are in fact denying people their right to free access of information.

    Cincinatti goes broadband with hundreds of watts of RF energy dissipated into the atmosphere and South America won't be able to listen to their AM radio stations anymore.

    BTW, this is not about ham radio, even though I have had my ham radio license since 1979. No, this is about the millions of villages all over the planet, tuning into shortwave radio broadcasts as their only source of timely information. Hundreds of Millons of individuals will love Americans for denying them that.

    Tyrrany of the minority, indeed. Since Americans barely represent 5% of this planet's population that statement fits the shoe perfectly, though I suspect it was made with a slightly different angle in mind in your case.

    BTW, "I hope the hams can be given some other chunk of spectrum to operate with" is about as perfect a display of ignorance as I have seen, even here on /.

  123. What about part 15 emissions? by part15guy · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know how these guys are able to comply with the FCC part 15.107 & 207 regulations on conducted emissions? What frequency are they using? If they are above 30 MHz, what about 15.109 & 209 regulations for radiated emissions? Are they taking a risk by staying below the regulatory limits or are they operating on a waiver of some sort?

  124. Re: can we expect... by logullo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's a fatal flaw in your argument.

    You claim that if you have to use ham radios for emergency communication, it will be because the power's out/the internet's down/pick your catastrophe... and then BPL won't be interfering with the hams, who can then step in and save the day.

    What you fail to recognize is that if BPL obliterates the HF spectrum, hams will no longer have incentive to maintain the ability to use the HF bands they currently use. Next time there's a tornado, earthquake, 9/11-type terrorist attack, there may not be hams there to help.

  125. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "did you RTFA?"

    You're new here, aren't you?

    (I've just always wanted to be the one to say that)

  126. Not a big deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know why this is so widely publicised? In Pennsylvania, we've had BPL for half a year now. Sure, it's a great technology, but do we need to here about every single place that has it? Granted, I wouldn't have minded seeing my tiny little city being on /., but still! Cya

  127. Re: can we expect... by cft_128 · · Score: 1
    Next stupid question? Perhaps you'd like an experiment to see if water freezes when you cool it?

    Water doesn't always freeze when you cool it. It will not freeze if you supercool it. Any other 'stupid' questions you want to ask?

    --

    Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

  128. Usher in one tech, usher out another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Broadband over power has benefits in that it's (generally) faster than dsl, requires no additional wiring, last mile costs are already taken care of. The problem is that it interferes with the HF radio band. The millitary is hosed. Ham radio is hosed. Ship to shore communication is hosed (Guess what...carefully aiming a satellite dish at a satellite on a rolling ship is hard to do). Long range aircraft communication is hosed (VHF is good for 140 miles at 30,000 feet. 140 miles ins't 1400 miles or 2800 miles and the ocean is a big place). It would be ok if they could get rid of the interference. Shielded power lines maybe? Just replace the grid and all house wiring (in all houses everywhere) and you are fine!

  129. unfortunately you haven't seen them vote.... by rbird76 · · Score: 2, Informative

    the Ronald Reagan Expressway...

    two stadiums for teams that have traditionally rewarded their fans with either stinginess in acquiring/keeping talent (the Reds) or just plain incompetence (the Bengals), paid for with taxpayer money (local sales tax). The Reds actually told the city where they wanted their (free) stadium and the city complied. This is fiscal conservatism, I guess...

    the police seemed to have been trained by the LAPD Rampart division (although they're apparently improving...)

    These are some of the glories of Cincinnati... The chili and the pigs are good ideas, though. Cincinnati is a pretty city, but I am a clueless liberal and don't understand anything their government does.

    1. Re:unfortunately you haven't seen them vote.... by hey! · · Score: 1

      two stadiums for teams that have traditionally rewarded their fans with either stinginess in acquiring/keeping talent (the Reds) or just plain incompetence (the Bengals), paid for with taxpayer money (local sales tax).

      And that would affect me, how?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:unfortunately you haven't seen them vote.... by swiggidy · · Score: 1

      Don't knock the cops. White cop kills black kid and it makes headline news. I don't know if the details make it out of the City but the kid ran into a dark ally, got caught in a dead end and started playing with his pants. This is in an area where after the riots were done there were 90 shooting incedents in 30 days with 30 deaths. The only reason I heard about that is because I was talking to a cop. That news didn't even make a splash inside the city. I realize there are worse places in the country, but I wouldn't exactly call it a safe neighborhood. If you knew everyone was packing I'd be nervous too.

    3. Re:unfortunately you haven't seen them vote.... by notbob · · Score: 0

      I'm proud of that police force, I still wish we'd used live ammo during the riots.

      There's protesting then there's nogs burning down their places, disrupting the flow of the city for us honest white people.

      I was working 2 blocks from where the riots started at the time, driving through police lines makes you truly understand that we need more police, and more violent police to effectively combat these useless f's. Seeing them trash their own KFC was comedy, the riots shut down a lot of business's that used to cater to those dumb shits.

      Deveroes, which is a all black / wigger store, every location got robbed, cause as their slogan goes "everyone knows to get yo clothes at deveroes", well the nogs sure got the message and robbed them blind.

  130. I can surf when the power goes out by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    My DSL router is plugged into my UPS. Sometimes I wouldn't even notice that the power has gone out if the UPS didn't beeping.

  131. Re: can we expect... by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

    Well it was my dad's 400W RMS/channel beast. Half heat-sink, analog meters and could probably shake the foundation of an apartment building and as I recally it cost an assload of money at the time.

    I really don't think it was a lousy amp. And this was a modular setup and as I recall, neither the tuner nor the preamp needed to be on for the signal to come in...

    That said it shouldn't even matter. I've lived on military bases and driven around radio towers and never pick up *their* signals. But I only have to be sitting near a truck with a (presumably fairly low power, since it's in the car) ham transmitter it'll completely overload my car stereo...

    Yea, I know most hams are responsible and if they have good equipment and USE THE LOWEST NECESSARY POWER FOR THEIR TRANSMISSION you never even know they're there. But man, getting that license just makes it possible to be sooooo obnoxious.

  132. You forgot a few things by brokeninside · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Cops shooting unarmed black men.

    Race riots.

    A city charter that makes discrimination on sexual orientation legal.

    Really bad drivers.

    1. Re:You forgot a few things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And black men who run from the cops while having 30+ warrants out for their arrest

      Race riots that have rioters trying things on in stores before they take them.

      Eh, the city council is horrible. Got me there.

      And, I take it you haven't driven in Atlanta?

    2. Re:You forgot a few things by hey! · · Score: 1

      I live in Boston. It also has a very checkered racial history, including with deliberate segregation in the sixties which was followed by wrenching social upheaval in response to forced busing in the seventies. I'm also liberal.

      I still think Boston is a very cool place.

      Basically, there isn't any city with sizable minority populations that doesn't have racial problems. I also hear what others have to say about Cinncinnati's arch conservative politics. Probably I'd hate that if I live there. But the place at least has some culture, and I think that says positive things about it.

      And speaking of politics, living in ultra-liberal Massachusetts, I can only note that competition improves the breed. Since the Republican party is too weak to mount any kind of credible opposition except for the governorship, most of our liberal politicians are the most "unimproved" there are.

      If you know a place where the grass truly is greener, let me know.

      And by the way, Cinncinati drivers don't hold a candle to Boston drivers for badness. The only place I've found worse is DC, and that's due to drivers diplomatic immunity.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:You forgot a few things by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > If you know a place where the grass truly is greener, let me know.

      Oooh, I can answer this one! According to Erma Bombeck, the grass is
      always greener right over the septic tank. HTH.HAND.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    4. Re:You forgot a few things by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > And by the way, Cinncinati drivers don't hold a candle to Boston drivers
      > for badness. The only place I've found worse is DC, and that's due to
      > drivers diplomatic immunity.

      I know a guy who claims the world's worst drivers live in Buenos Aires. He
      tells horror stories about people doing eighty mph on roads we'd consider
      unfit for vehicular travel. Also he says that when there's a train, the
      drivers on both sides of the tracks will position their cars as close to
      the tracks as possible, filling all lanes, shoulders, everything, and then
      when the train is gone everyone just tries to go forward.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    5. Re:You forgot a few things by l1gunman · · Score: 1

      I'll second that about BA. My father spent some time there on business some years back and tells two stories about BA drivers:

      1. When they come to an intersection or stop sign or traffic lights they typically just honk their horns and drive through without even pretending to stop.

      2. When travelling at night and approaching an intersection, my dad's driver would turn off his headlights so as to see if there was another car approaching. Seeing no other headlights, he would simply drive on through without stopping and while barely slowing at all. God help the pair of drivers that *both* turned off their headlights at the same time and thought the same thing.

      I used to pull that last stunt when I lived in Ariona, south of Phoenix, where the interesections out in nowheresville were approx. one mile apart with land so flat you could see for miles. Worked a treat till I realized the part about two drivers doing the same thing simultaneously (or a cop sitting in the dark just up the road).

  133. Y'OK, mod down please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would you feel if BPL shut down 911? I bet you wouldn't be too happy.

    Yes, because then we wouldn't have had dead firefighters.

    Oh, and this is completely besides the point that maybe... just MAYBE... the power companies would turn off the BPL. MAYBE.

    Please mod this down immediately.

  134. majority vs. most money (Re:HAM vs. BPL) by mi · · Score: 1
    The majority often times rules. Or at least lately those with the most money make the rules/laws.

    These groups are very much distinct, although both like to steer laws/rules in their favor :-) Which one are you suspecting here?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:majority vs. most money (Re:HAM vs. BPL) by rodgster · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking that both groups:

      Computer users have a much larger user base than HAM, majority vote and possibly infulence.

      I also figure power companies have a lot more money than HAM to buy laws/rulings with.

      Therefore I think both are likely to favor BPL over HAM.

      But I think everyone hates SPAM (wonder if someone will try to blame HAM for it).

      --
      Who will guard the guards?
    2. Re:majority vs. most money (Re:HAM vs. BPL) by oddstar · · Score: 1

      I somehow doubt that HAM enthusiasts are usually either the majority or those with the most money...

    3. Re:majority vs. most money (Re:HAM vs. BPL) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the majority, of course not.

      With the most money? Per capita yes.

  135. Just Cincinatti? Vendors in three states... by mi · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    According to the PCWorld article on Yahoo!
    More than a million residents of Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana will have a new broadband option this month in the first large-scale rollout of broadband over power line (BPL) service, despite concerns that the new BPL technology interferes with other radio frequency devices, including ham radios.

    I personally, think the ham-radio should yield. An enthusiast-only hobby (admittedly, not one of mine) vs. cheap Internet access for the masses? Sorry...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Just Cincinatti? Vendors in three states... by kc8apf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obviously you've missed the part about amatuer radio being a sanctioned FCC emergency service. It's there when others fail.

      --
      kc8apf
    2. Re:Just Cincinatti? Vendors in three states... by mi · · Score: 1

      I dunno. To me, who never used ham-radio, it seems, you are missing the difference between "being used" and "being sanctioned". It may give ham-enthusiasts an ego-boost and braggin rights, but I think, having cheap broadband everyday (it can be used for emergency communications as well) is better than an additional backup of "emergency service".

      Do you know, when anyone in an urban area last had to resort to ham radio, because other emergency communication services failed?

      Besides, when/if it is bad enough for such need to arise, the broad-band Internet will be down already and not interfere...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:Just Cincinatti? Vendors in three states... by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

      Whats goin' on rick?

      Makes me sick to read about as well. Hopefully, the FCC will take a concrete stand on such things.

      --kc8aot

    4. Re:Just Cincinatti? Vendors in three states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know, when anyone in an urban area last had to resort to ham radio, because other emergency communication services failed?

      That would be last August, when the power company in the other corner of Ohio blacked-out the East Coast for half a day.

    5. Re:Just Cincinatti? Vendors in three states... by mi · · Score: 1

      Perfect! And all interference from the power-lines stopped completely...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  136. Re: can we expect... by zorro2676 · · Score: 1

    If the only time that the Ham bands could be used is when the service is shut off, then people will not buy and use Ham-related equipment. So, the emergency services that Hams provide may not be there when the BPL is shut off. So, the emergency services argument does hold some weight.

  137. Re: can we expect... by ka9qpn · · Score: 1

    Oh, God NO!!! All interference is due to evil, selfish hams! It sucks that everytime the subject of ham radio comes up that someone who had a crappy experience years ago with one guy has to unlimber his tarbrush.

    Unfortunately, the visible side of ham radio is the interference, the on-the-air whining about bunions and bypasses, and the useless contesting which probably does more to clog the HF airwaves on weekends than BPL ever will. We hams are going to reap the benefits of bad responses like this guy's (which never get forgotten), the inability to relate our hobby to the kids, and promotion of some odd kind of secret society mentality. Yeah, we do public service, but not enough to save our asses this time.

  138. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes... yes I do.

  139. And you should see the lines . . . by moultano · · Score: 1

    At the skyline by the university there is typically a line out the door at 3 AM. Best Munchie food ever!

  140. Re: can we expect... by cybermace5 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Put down the ham set and pick up the power line. The Internet is now infinitely more accessible and far-reaching than amateur radio ever was or will be. Sure, you can link up with satellites and coordinate a large effort to talk with someone on the other side of the world for a few minutes. Sure, the hardware's interesting and it's a nice nondestructive hobby. But the world of radio and wired communications has been growing exponentially while the ham community sits still. Every other person in developed countries has a pocket-sized radio that will let them talk to anyone in the world. Sending images and documents to another person either wirelessly or over land lines is no longer an exciting event to be shown off at the local ham club meeting, it's something ordinary people do every day.

    There's something to be said for maintaining old traditions and primitive tools, but don't try to preserve it at the expense of forward progress. There are isolated cases of ham radios playing important roles in emergency missions, but these are very rare and you have to know that the hams were bounding with joy behind their microphones at the opportunity to do something more useful than lie about their last fishing trip.

    --
    ...
  141. Re: can we expect... by jim_deane · · Score: 1

    But I have not yet seen any objective evidence that Broadband over Powerlines causes more interference than the existence of the power lines themselves. Maybe the studies are there - if they are, great. But I haven't seen any that aren't sponsored by either amateur radio groups or energy companies.

    Well, if you can get Aunt Fannie's Quilting Association to sponsor a radio frequency interference profile, be my guest.

    My guess is that the military and FEMA are conducting tests now, but the results may not be available to the public for a while...if ever. Expect the FCC to swiftly and severely crack down on power companies that interfere with military operations.

    Jim kc0lpv

  142. Re: can we expect... by MadHungarian1917 · · Score: 1

    As a duly licensed ham radio operator. I feel compelled to point out that Ham radio's mission in life is to provide emergency communications in times of national emergencies or natural disaster. The fact that we get to play with slices of spectrum is a nice benefit but not the primary rationale for Ham Radio.

    During 9/11 Ham Radio was the only viable wide area communications system which still worked after the loss of the facilities located on the WTC.

    Most governental radio systems were kaput.

    This is just another example of the current administration selling out the average citzens welfare for the benefit of moneyed interests.

  143. Re: can we expect... by lithiumfrost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are two large problems with this type of thinking. For one, "tyranny of the minority" in this case happens to benefit all people, inluding those with broadband, which ceases to function when power lines go down. During hurricanes, tornadoes, and other natural disasters, I think most people will be relieved at the emergency services offered by HAMs. FEMA and other organizations rely on them.

    Changing radio frequencies is not all that easy. These are internationally chosen frequencies, because the HF spectrum works worldwide. I doubt the ITU will be willing to change the entire spectrum for a few cities to get broadband. Those are major infrastructure changes, and those frequencies are valuable. Who else is going to give up theirs for HAM's who will not pay (because it is amateur radio for hobbyists)? In this sense, "we were here first" is an excellent argument.

    --
    Que tout ce qui est vrai.
  144. Wait a minute... by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is a terrible idea! You couldn't surf the internet while the power is out!

    1. Re:Wait a minute... by crushinghellhammer · · Score: 1

      lol..or worse still, no power for you if you don't pay your internet bill...

      just kidding hehe

  145. Obligatory Cincitucky Joke by MicroBerto · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    So what's gonna happen to their connections during the next round of riots when all the morons down there knock down all of the power lines and telephone poles?

    Haha, sorry, but I'm from Cleveland and currently live in Columbus and had to poke!

    --
    Berto
    1. Re:Obligatory Cincitucky Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      At least we have a football team. DOH!

      "You don't live in Cleveland. You live in Cincinnati!"

      Love, Sam Wyche

  146. One less bill to mail out by elasticwings · · Score: 1

    If this were in my area, then I could ditch the cable line altogether like I did with the phone line. Right now, I'm paying almost 50 dollars a month for my 39.95 a month cable internet. I don't watch tv. I don't need cable. I do however need power. It'd be so great to have my internet added on to my utilities.

  147. HamRadio == Dinosaur, Mr High Tech is/needs a dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and Trans continental flights as well as ocean wide shipping are archaic as well.
    Hey the military really does not the communications.
    Explains why the BBC stopped broadcasts to the US as of late.

    The static here will cross the globe via F2 propagation Mr. Science.

    You are soooooo high tech. Certainly do not want to be in YOUR way as you pollute the airways world wide so you can get your dose of PORN.

    Imbecile.

  148. Re: can we expect... by op00to · · Score: 1

    Ahh, he never said that water always freezes when you cool it. He merely used a sarcastic statement to point out that you are an asshole. Get it straight!

  149. Re: can we expect... by Woody77 · · Score: 1

    Actually, FEMA uses ARES for it's emergency services in most areas....

  150. Re: can we expect... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

    What about the other power companies that see a potential 10 billion dollar market in broadband? They might spare some lawyers. Especially juicy is the idea that they may be the only high speed option for rural houses. Unless Johnny
    Cochran has a 40 ft antenna in his yard, I think the HAM people will lose this one.

    -B

  151. Total Cost of Ownership buddy... by raehl · · Score: 1

    You may have a point, if your dialup line is the same as your voice line, but if you have a separate line for dialup (as any parent who has let their kid use their computer long enough to discover the joys of instant messaging would certainly want), depending on how much an extra line is in your neck of the woods, broadband over power lines might actually be a few bucks *LESS* than dialup + extra phone line.

    1. Re:Total Cost of Ownership buddy... by TravisWatkins · · Score: 1

      Its worse. Around here the cost of plain old 1024/256 ADSL ($40) is actually cheaper than 56k + phone line.

      --

      "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
  152. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heck, just spread the rumor that those boxes up on the power pole are used to monitor your every activity to the government and watch them develop small holes from flying lead projectiles. In the rural areas just tell them that they are for target practice.

    Parts of southern Ohio are more southern that parts of the south.

  153. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could care less about South Americans not being able to listen to AMERICAN radio stations. They don't pay for them. GET A LIFE FREELOADERS!

  154. Re: can we expect... by fltsimbuff · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "YOU are the minority. There are people on this planet OUTSIDE the USA, do you know that?"

    Irrelevent. This is between the FCC, and power companies in the US. Unless you are afraid Joe User's BPL service in Kansas is going to interfere with Claude User's HAM in France...

    If transmissions that are unintentional can affect an area that far away, power companies ought to get into the broadcasting business.

    Besides all that, have you heard about the experiments in the UK with BPL? You think that the US is the first to do this? Talk about ignorance. Go read http://www.hydro.co.uk/broadband/index.asp or http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/27221 .html

    I could be wrong about the distance that the interference reaches, but if you are wanting to blame something on Americans, find something else.

    That said, there has been much fear and apprehension to many new technologies being deployed. I welcome the rollout of these services, as they will confirm those, or belay them for good.

  155. Re: can we expect... by kc8apf · · Score: 2

    > Every other person in developed countries has a pocket-sized radio that will let them talk to anyone in the world.

    Of course, amatuer radio is present even in undeveloped countries and in some cases is the only way to communicate with someone other than the locals.

    Don't assume that simply because the Internet has changed how communication is done that it is the end-all solution. What happens when an attack brings down the core routers? The Internet isn't quite as capable of routing around failures as everyone hopes.

    As for commercial radio, even with walkie-talkies, you can't even come close to the distance, variety of services, independence of infrastructure, or ease of setup that amatuer radio offers.

    --
    kc8apf
  156. Re: can we expect... by cft_128 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I don't disagree with the statement that wideband signals, when pushed through a long, unshielded wire, radiate. I just don't want to assume that this radiation causes significant interference until we have more studies/testing. Did the poster reference any studies that say it does? No, he just said we should assume it interferes, the referenced study is crap and blindly ignore this potentially good technology. Who is the asshole? If we don't keep an open mind, we are screwed. I know that FEMA and other groups will have a say in this and do studies that will be biased to their interests, but until then I will not rush to judgment and say a new technology is crap and we should just ignore it.

    Am I an asshole for saying that the poster should keep an open mind? Maybe I should have been more careful with my wording:

    Perhaps you'd like an experiment to see if water freezes when you cool it?

    Well, people do experiment with this, and call it supercooling when the water doesn't freeze. Sometimes obvious things are not that obvious and more research is needed before leaping to confusion.

    Trying to get people to think rather than have knee jerk reactions and stick their head in the sand is hard work.

    --

    Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

  157. Re: can we expect... by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

    Ok, so it's for people in the middle of nowhere, and people waiting for the apocalypse. In neither case is broadband-over-power a problem.

    --
    ...
  158. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heres another one. several companies and researchers worked on this all over europe last couple of years to conclude that its just not that nice and completely dropped any plans about it being implemented other than those experimental areas. Nice, and what i usually hear about the US is that you guys got such crappy wires you cant go much further with this.
    Good luck anyway!

  159. Ok...How bout a solution... by bigkahunafish · · Score: 1
    Well, its obvious that the HAMs out there hate BPL. Well then, what happens to us ruralites? I still sit here at home with my juno account dialing away to connect at friggin 44K ....

    I see as the town people get their cable, get their DSL and are chugging away....
    where am I?

    Sitting back with my Yugo class internet....

    Can we get some plausible alternatives? I mean, cellular, satellite and broadcast internet are great ideas, but some currently cost $60/month for inferior service...

    ..also many of these rumors of broadcast wireless internet seem years and years off ...I GIVE UP!!!

    now to wait 5 minutes for this submission to go thru...

    --
    Eat a Chicken, You know you want to.
    1. Re:Ok...How bout a solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's that big of a deal for you, MOVE to where you can get the access you need.

      My God...oh thats right, people have a right to expect everything to just come to them.

  160. Zoomtown not 3/1 MbPS yet by bahamutirc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Zoomtown is not yet 3/1 MbPS, though they claim to be making the changes. RoadRunner has changed to 3, but it's not available in Northern Kentucky. Additionally, not everybody lives in town -- most rural communities out here don't have anything.

    Unfortunately, some areas use Hamilton City power, so I doubt it's available to them.

    I bet this will be big in Northern Kentucky.

    1. Re:Zoomtown not 3/1 MbPS yet by sheetsda · · Score: 1
      Zoomtown is not yet 3/1 MbPS

      from my DSL modem:
      cbos>show interface wan0
      wan0 ADSL Physical Port
      Line Trained
      3200 Kbps down; 952 Kbps up; 680 down baud; 136 up baud
      ...
      and I've noticed dramatically increased transfer speeds.
  161. Re: can we expect... by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

    Ok, yeah my rant there was probably uncalled for. And didn't really make the point I wanted to anyway.

    I never said all interference comes from hams. And in fact I do agree that hams have their uses in emergencies. And in contrast to my rant, you get the hams popping out of the woodwork complaining that the broadband'll interfere with them.

    I don't question that most hams are good guys who do their best to not trample on other signals, but I *do* question whether they should get priority over other signals (be it broadband, my cordless phone or a cheap baby monitor) during non-emergency situations.

  162. The downside by isomeme · · Score: 1

    Who wants a net connection that drops every time there's a power failure?

    Oh, wait.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  163. Re: can we expect... by blindbat · · Score: 1

    So, you are saying there won't be any WKRP in Cincinnati?

  164. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on now, how many power lines are at sea or in the sky? The signal levels they are talking about are very very weak. You have to be right next to the power lines to be affected, if you are affected at all.

  165. Re: can we expect... by Ramadog · · Score: 1
    Sometimes the interference is the equiment not a crappy signal from the amateur radio operator. With your amp it could have been a number of things including lack of filtering for frequencies above the audio so it did not stay an audio only amp and the leads between components acting as antennas.

    Had a vcr that went stupid every anytime there was a transmittor nearby. Amateur or otherwise. Only vcr I have had a problem with. The problem was fixed using 2 x 15 cent capacitors and 3 coils made from hookup wire wound a around a pencil. A simple filter and the problem was fixed. The problem was fixed using 30 cents (retail price) worth of parts.

    Neighour complaing of tvi problems. The feed line to his tv antenna had broken and needed to be replaced. Still blamed me.

    Powered computer speakers acting as a radio receiver. Speakers should not act as radio receivers. If a speaker acts as a radio receiver there is something wrong with the speaker. At least it should be easy to fix.

    My favourite. Another neighour complainng of tvi even when all my radios are turned off. Their problem was a very bad reception area for the tv channel they were trying to watch. A better tv antenna fixed the problem.

    I can under stand why he might have been an ass. Not excusing it because he should not have been. But if you receive enough complaints and it is mostly because of shody comsumer goods or the people are just clueless it is easy to become a bit cynical.

  166. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you talking about? Are you saying that emissions from BPL on a power line in the USA will reach more than across the street? You better do some more homework.

  167. I love Slashdot by salesgeek · · Score: 1

    Every time something really new gets posted it seems like we here this massive chorus of:

    "WE CANT DO THIS BECAUSE OF _____."

    in this case it's ham radio interference, or evesdropping or whatever. Most of the time the nay sayers are wrong. Usually those details are thought out and the product isn't half as bad as the naysayers here say it will be. Instead of being skeptical to the point of paddling down a certain river in Egypt, why not be a little more open to innovation?

    --
    -- $G
    1. Re:I love Slashdot by ToW85 · · Score: 1
      Every time something really new gets posted it seems like we here this massive chorus of:


      This is not new. PLC (Power Line Communications) have been tried in Europe. Somehow, almost every single one of the trials got silently cancelled. We had PLC here in Finland. Had. The company providing PLC switched over to WLAN.

      This time, they naysayers are right. Might it be that the power companies actually don't have the required expertise in the area of communications?

      I suspect that the trial won't live too long. As soon as the Ohio National Guard gets their band filled with interference... <g>
      --
      99 bottles of beer on the wall... take one down, chug it a-down 98 bottles of beer on the wall... 98 bottles of beer on
  168. hope it makes momentum by sjalex · · Score: 1

    I hope this helps turn other places around, here in Texas it's against the law for utility companies to offer internet service. I still haven't been able to figure out why not...

  169. Wonderful for you all. by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 1

    For all you Ham radio can die types here is some news for you all. I am going to be forced to run my 1200 watts PEP on HF all the time to overcome your interfence folks. Lots more people will be buying HF RF amplifiers. Instead of the lower power levels most have been running they will run the max as the rules allow for. "The minium power necessary to carry out communications" up to a max of 1200 watts PEP. They will be installing gain types of antennas instead of the usual dipole non gain types.

    Bottom line don't try and out tech a techie and don't try to out geek a geek. All the packets you will be dropping and connection failing will make you wish you were back on your old dialup. You are not even close to know how screwed the interference is going to be to your beloved broadband over powerlines. While I simply am just doing what I legaly can to maintain communications from my licensed amateur radio station. You r man made interference will loose out in the end. everytime I hear that racket in my radio I am going to be on the phone to my power company complaining about the RF leak. (Not allowed under the current regulations which are not being waved.) They will have to come out and "fix" it. So good luck.

    --
    If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
    Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
    1. Re:Wonderful for you all. by jtn · · Score: 1

      That's 1500 watts, except on the 30 meter band.

    2. Re:Wonderful for you all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really don't understand the technology do you? If BPL was losing that much power to radiated emissons, the signal would never reach the receiver. This is because the power lines are acting as TRANSMISSION lines. Your feable attempt to up your signal strength by 30dBm will not matter with properly designed BPL modems. By the way dont hurt yourself with your 1500watt brain heater...

  170. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck! Your outdated equipment doesn't stand a chance at interfering with a superior digital product. Doesn't matter how much power you throw at it, unless you connect your power amp directly to the power line.... There's an idea! Get back to me and let me know how that worked out!

  171. Re:And in other news...Riots! by SiO2 · · Score: 0, Troll

    -1 Troll?

    Okay. The mods are on crack tonight. "Put down the crack pipe and move away from the mouse." You can choose to ignore reality, young welp, but it will eventually bite you on your posterior.

    So, how is that Dungeons and Dragons thing working out? Have you kissed a girl yet or do you shave your hands on a daily basis? ; )

    I'll accept the mod. This is /.. We all have opions and enforce them when we can with moderator points.

    SiO2

  172. In an emergency.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the power lines go down...the interference disappears. Thus HAM radios can operate, if there really is a problem.

    I want to see a full, independent study of this.

    Let Cincy activate it, run it for a year or 2. Then do the serious polling of HAM operators. If there is problems then we should hear about it.

  173. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no doubt that Ham radio hackers have added an imense amount of knowledge to the subject. I think they have fallen way behind when it comes to newer technologies though. When was the last time you saw a functional spread spectrum frequency hopper in the HAM circles? 1996? Oops forgot they never got it to work.... I say let the HAM radio guys listen to a little bit of static here and there if they are right next to a power line.... bring in the new stuff!

  174. "for once"?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, my town gets AHEAD of the times, for once.

    What? Are you kidding? I remember visiting Cincy back in '99 and drooling over the affordable 8mbit DSL connection my cousin's husband already had at his disposal.

    Cincinnati Bell was offering this "Zoomtown" service years before anything comparable became available here in the Netherlands.

    And considering how often I see people here on /. bitching and moaning about being stuck to cable or even dial-up and not having DSL available in their areas, I think it's safe to conclude that quality broadband is still not available major parts of the US today, let alone five years ago!

  175. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Power lines don't cause RF interference. You are thinking of electromagnetic induction. Not the same as radiated emissions. I think that is what a lot of the confusion is over... Just because your car stereo crackles under the power lines doesn't mean that that it is picking up radiated 60Hz signals, that would be very ignorant to think so. It is field around the power lines that you are coupled to . Just move away from the field. You would have to be in outer space to pick up radiated 60Hz signals...

  176. Re: can we expect... by Dravik · · Score: 1

    What many people seem to be forgetting is that hams aren't the only ones affected. The US Military uses the HF frequencies extesively. If the problems are as bad as the hams fear, DOD will go to bat against this. The military can not afford to lose commo because somebody is sharing his p0rn collection.

    --
    The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
  177. Re: can we expect... by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

    As much as I'd like to believe that the FCC are stoic defenders of the airwaves, if by some odd chance this risky scheme actually works, you'll find support for Hams weak at best. Look at how fast we lost that little piece of FM when they were fishing for wireless phone bandwidth.

    --
    Fred

    "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
    -RMS
  178. More power by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    More power to them, and bandwidth, for less, no less.

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  179. Ham radio == Dinosaur-Internet addicts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You know what? I've read through a lot of the comments here and as an outside observer I'd say that people are addicted to the Internet.

    Notice all the flipping around to justify it.
    One is even suggesting a kill switch. I can only conclude that the advocates have never faced a disaster requiring Hams. They most likely have never hammed in their life.

    I just hope that these addicts don't end up destroying a good thing in the process of getting their fix.

  180. Re: can we expect... by nyseal · · Score: 1

    I was under the belief that ANY ground based radio wave lengths do not follow the curvature of the earth....so how does this natural curve NOT protect SA from NA? Unless you still believe the world is flat....

    --
    [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
  181. Re: can we expect... by Bagheera · · Score: 1

    In other news, bread manufacturers are providing lots of evidence that the Atkins diet is crap.

    Cute. But there -are- a lot of nutritionists who've said the Atkins diet is crap. Just because the source of a given report benefits from a particular outcome does not, by default, mean the results are biased and should be discarded.

    ARRL says it interferes. The power company says it doesn't. Duh. I'd like to see some objective studies on this.

    Also note the amature operators don't stand to make money by showing broadband over power lines interferes. The power companies, however, stand to gain quite a bit here. You want to presume bias? Ok. Then apply it here and decide who's more likely to bias their studies.

    Maybe the studies are there - if they are, great. But I haven't seen any that aren't sponsored by either amateur radio groups or energy companies.

    They are. I gave you the URL if you'd care to look. But see my first comment. The methodology used in the ARRL survey is well documented and, unlike a bazillion user bread study, is something you can duplicate yourself. You're kind of taking the "I haven't visited the moon myself, or seen a picture of the LEM on the surface by anyone but the US government, so the landings were probably a hoax" stance.

    Don't believe it causes interference?

    Grab a receiver that covers the HAM bands, and go someplace where they're trying this out. You want objective studies, then DO them. Radio isn't rocket science.

    --
    Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
  182. Re: can we expect... by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you'd like an experiment to see if water freezes when you cool it?

    yes I would, can I choose to have it supercooled and bet it wont freeze as long as nothing touches it?

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  183. Re: can we expect... by fltsimbuff · · Score: 1

    Redundant? Would someone mind pointing out where everything I said was said before over and over?

    Seems to me someone is abusing their mod privelages...

  184. Re: can we expect... by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    I do have some sympathy for "we were here first" but at some point it would simply be a tyranny of the minority.

    the gays,lesbians, and atheists already have the "tyranny of the minority" angle covered.

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  185. Interference by retsoksirhc · · Score: 1

    If theres not enough interference now with all the power running through the lines, what harm can some packets cause? I mean, theres already a signal running through them, even if it is natural current. If packets are sent through in an orderly fashion wont there be less interference cause from them than there is caused by the power, since the packets will have a wave pattern and be easier to detect and filter out? I don't know much about the physics of it, but it seems to me that if there isnt interference with the lines in place and operating alrezady, there wont be any if you send different signals through them.

    1. Re:Interference by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      Power is at low frequency (60 Hz). There is no RF traffic at that frequency that I'm aware of. Data will be on the lines at high frequency and will splat into some used part of the RF spectrum (apparently the part used by ham radio).

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
  186. Re: can we expect... by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    do a google search on tropospheric ducting to see an example of how far radio waves can propogate.

    It all depends on wavelength.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  187. 1meg NOT BROADBAND!!!!!!!!! by greggman · · Score: 1

    This is pissing me off. People in America getting excited that they are getting 1meg?

    Try 100meg each for $50 a month
    http://www.usen.com
    http://www.netsurf.ad. jp/kojin/tepco/hikari.html
    http://www.flets.com/o pt/index.html

    For 40meg each for $30 a month

    http://www.flets.com/adsl/index.html
    http://bbp romo.yahoo.co.jp/promotion/service/45m/i ndex.html
    http://www.so-net.ne.jp/ADSL/?ac_adsl1
    http://www.odn.ne.jp/english/

    1meg is disgraceful! The U.S. is going to lose any and all advantages in the not too distant future if we don't make sure we stay ahead of the rest of the world.

    Kids in Japan and Korea will grow up with 100meg net connections and they will therefore be the ones dreaming up uses for it while our kids will grow up with 64k to 3meg and will therefore not be inspired to consider the possibilities.

    1. Re:1meg NOT BROADBAND!!!!!!!!! by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      You might want to compare the relative sizes and population densities of the two countries before asking why one can't match the other in infrastructure investment.

    2. Re:1meg NOT BROADBAND!!!!!!!!! by greggman · · Score: 1

      excuses won't help you stay ahead. It does matter why they are ahead it only matters that they are.

  188. Double the Power! by DrDebug · · Score: 1

    If I run my house on 220 volts, will I get twice the bandwidth??

  189. Re: can we expect... by nyseal · · Score: 2, Informative

    I did the search and read about a dozen articles (mainly from William Hepburn...he seems the most knowledgeable apparently) and it still seems this phenomenon is dependent on weather; not the wave lengths themselves or any other outside force. The reason people can receive AM transmissions further from their source is the fact that they have a longer wave length versus FM...hence some of these waves can travel over a curvature longer....like the earth's surface. That's why you'll lose a FM station faster from the point of origin than an AM station. In bad weather, you'll lose both at the same rate....which also lends credence to William Hepburn's theory; weather. This may, or may not affect transmissions from SA to NA, however in either case communications in ALL forms are usually affected by the weather so we're back to square one; regardless of how they propogate.

    --
    [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
  190. They are not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ham radio operators are constantly pushing the limits of communications technology,"

    They are not. Have you even listened to what these yahoos do with their ham radio gear?

    They talk to each other and tell each other what kind of equipment they have.

    The guys into this are like male nurses and clowns all tied together in one scary package.

    I know...I've visted a couple hamfests. It AIN'T pretty.

    1. Re:They are not by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      That sort of thing does occur, but no more does it describe the whole of ham operations than does rice rocket drivers and tweakers and racers describe all of car driving and automotive enthusiasts.

      Hamfests are something unusual, and they do often draw the geekiest of the geekies. But theyre fun, and sometimes its fun to talk about what gear you have. Hey how many computer guys do you know that want to tell you about their new Pentium 4 Extreme Edition or quad xeon setup?

  191. BPL when there's no P? by camisade · · Score: 1

    With DSL, if you have a UPS, you may keep your connection if the power goes out--phone lines, in many areas (mine, anyway, no matter where I've lived) often operate during power outages. What happens to BPL if power goes out? If you have a UPS, can you still remain connected?

  192. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is just another example of the current administration selling out the average citzens welfare for the benefit of moneyed interests.
    Do you scream out Bush's name in angst upon stubbing your toe?
  193. Here are the videos to prove it by celerityfm · · Score: 1
    --
    ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  194. I shot loads of nut butter looking at that chick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, I nutted all over myself more than a few times watching her ta-tas in the re-runs.

  195. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I suspect the fellow you are responding too is truly ignorant to the scope of the situation.

    I thought the exact same thing as you. The issue is not interference with HAM operators -- that's just a side effect of the bigger issue.

    The problem is that most people don't understand what RF even is. We need a good analogy that regular people can understand so they can appreciate the scope of the problem.

    For instance, there are rules that state how bright and wide the beams can be on our vehicles headlamps. These guys are metaphorically attaching aerial flood lamps to a school bus so everyone in their vehicle can see for miles. The side effect is everyone else on the road is now blind. In this case the light is the transmitter and your eyes are the receiver.

    How bout this one, your in a gym having a conversation with some friends -- then a marching band comes rolling in screamming the schools fight song. Guess who the band represents. Try carrying on your conversation now.

    The FCC part 15 rules exist for a reason. We just need to make sure they are enforced.

    I say let these guys launch the service then we can document the scope of the problems this technology creates before we crush them.

    I like the idea of BPL. The power companys just need to run RF grade sheilded power lines first.

    Oh, oops thats right. It would cost money -- alot more than just bribing the right senators.

  196. Re: can we expect... by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

    there is the usual cry that Amature Radio is dead, and isn't useful, and what have you

    I hope these newfangled cars don't run too many horses and buggies off the road! Vital emergency services are provided by horse drawn carriages.

  197. Cinci Broadband by lawnm0werman · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about?, "Finally, my town gets AHEAD of the times, for once." Cincinnati had DSL and Cable LONG before just about anyone else, and still has it faster than almost everywhere in the nation.

  198. Is this really a good idea? by MrBook2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    While I agree that the ARRL has a vested interest in this debate, I think it is fair to say that they know a thing or two about interference (see this link for instance). Not only has this been shown to interfere, think of the interference to BPL. Allowing this to go forward will force something to give.

    This isn't just a local problem either. Have a look at this report from the ECC (they are a European agency) [NOTE: Sorry, it is in MS Word format]. They clearly believe that interference potential in the frequency range up to 30 MHz "are such that the risk of interference to radio services cannot be limited to a national or regional scale" (see the section entitled "General Conclusions of the report). This is a 112 page report, and while I freely admit I have not read all of it, they clearly say that this won't be a local problem, so just leaving the city isn't going to help. They go on to say that complete interference level restrictions won't work since so many devices currently give off interference in these ranges, but that the BPL (Called PLT in this report) will give "much higher" level of interference.

    Several people in this tread have argued that amateur radio is a "dinosaur" or lived passed its usefulness. Many have already pointed out the problems with this. In many parts of the country, HF radio is the only reliable form of communication. In emergency situations HAM radio has proved itself many times over. Have a look here for instance. FEMA have defended the need for amateur radio on numerous occasions.

    There is more at stake here than HAM. Have a look at this chart. Of particular interest are the chunks that are noted as "Radio Astronomy". Have a look at this report. Of note here is that the radio astronomy bands have issues with interference already. Solar and molecular cloud observations fall in these wavelengths. Do we really want to add to the pollution of the electromagnetic spectrum? The BPL system will also be subject to interference. This seems like a lose-lose situation to me.

  199. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for god's sake, we already gave you NAFTA, now you want to deny us cheaper highER speed internet???

    screw ham radio

  200. Re: can we expect... by Makoss · · Score: 1

    Yeah! The bastards are stealing our air too! WTF?


    I seriously hope you were being sarcastic.

    --
    Building a better backup.
    Zettabyte Storage
  201. What ports are open? Static or dynamic by PD · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I chose DSL over Cable because I could get a static IP with no ports blocked. What will the electric company offer?

    1. Re:What ports are open? Static or dynamic by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1
      I chose DSL over Cable because I could get a static IP with no ports blocked. What will the electric company offer?
      An electrostatic IP. Try getting that from the phone company!
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  202. Re: can we expect... by Makoss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The window of spectrum used by HAM is special purely because it is capable of reaching very long distances. Yay for the ionosphere. . .

    This is a most unfortunate conflict of interest as I would LOVE symetric 1mbps for $30/mo.

    But there are other ways of getting high speed access, there isn't another frequency range that transmits as well.

    --
    Building a better backup.
    Zettabyte Storage
  203. Re: can we expect... by Makoss · · Score: 1

    Not sure about this particular source, but it was top on google, and its a very well documented effect.
    http://www.realscience.com/propagation.ht m


    In related news, Maxwell says "Suck it".

    --
    Building a better backup.
    Zettabyte Storage
  204. Already been done by Ashtead · · Score: 1

    Although this one is made to Europeian standard, I am sure it would not be that hard to make a similar one for the US.

    --
    SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
  205. Re: can we expect... by nyseal · · Score: 1

    Fine...I read the article and I have no problem with it. I'm sure it's scientifically correct. The problem is that's not what I was referring to. What I was trying to say is that radio waves DO travel in a linear pattern and the only limiting factor IS the weather (or the sun). ALL communications on this planet are affected by weather; HAM included. Are we now disputing that wave lengths flow in linear patterns? Even if they bounce off an ionosphere during transmission does not mean they are non-linear. It doesn't even mean they can reach the opposite side of the planet. There are transmissions sent out to the universe by planet earth 45 years ago that were limited in their process by the 'ionosphere' and 'troposphere' but still made it out to the freedom of outer space on a linear wave length.

    --
    [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
  206. HAM radio operaters are full of aging hot air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to have a lot more respect for HAM operaters before this while BPL issue came up. Most of them don't know what the hell they are talking about. I say if the best they can come up with is that we need them in emergency situations, then lets require them to implement new digital spread spectrum systems to communicate. problem solved. I doubt any HAM out there is up to the task. Come on guys, you are behind by 2 centuries now...

  207. Re: can we expect... by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

    There is also the fact that for atmospheric reflection, not all frequencies bend at the same angle (think prism). An FM signal gets smashed in the upper atmosphere due to the nature of its transmission method, so not much sky-wave propagation is taking place even when FM is used at lower frequencies.

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  208. Dark Ages.... by Tudil+Di'Masharen · · Score: 0
    Finally, my town gets AHEAD of the times, for once.

    If only my town would move out of the dark ages and into the glorious revolution of high-speed internet. Oh well. I guess I'll have to continue living in a third-world town. *sigh*

  209. Ha-Ha! by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    $29.95 a month is how much cable modem service is where I live. Eat that Cincinatti!

  210. Re:Ham radio== Dinosaur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHAT!
    LAW AND TEACHING?
    What about the fact that the world all over is perfecting this
    technology for the use by goverments and citizens to not have
    to depend only on an untested virus ridden/infested system?

    The net is really great but Radio is at the top of all
    technologies used for communications. So instead of taking
    out a very proven techology that has served humanity very
    well, think of how to merge it with the WWW explotion.

  211. Re: can we expect... by DF5JT · · Score: 1

    "The problem is that's not what I was referring to. What I was trying to say is that radio waves DO travel in a linear pattern and the only limiting factor IS the weather (or the sun)."

    You really don't know what you are talking about, because that exactly is what shortwave propagation is about. With my ridiculously small ham setup I can talk to my buddies all over the planet - my bandwidth being some hundred Hz and my output power not even reaching 100 Watts.

    BPL setup radiate with HUGE antennas (power lines ARE antennas) and with lots more power and the entire bandwidth of the shortwave spectrum. Please do some background reading before you go on a wild assumption ride.

  212. Re: can we expect... by DF5JT · · Score: 1

    "Are you saying that emissions from BPL on a power line in the USA will reach more than across the street? You better do some more homework."

    I only see one of us in need of doing his homework and it certainly is not me.

  213. Re: can we expect... by Makoss · · Score: 1

    Of course they are effected by the weather, it's a propagating EM wave. It's got all sorts of fun with scattering and absorption. I am not disputing in any way that weather effects radio.

    Nor am I disputing that EM waves travel in a linear fashion (with corrections for GR and peculiarities of the medium).

    I fail to see how this is relevent to the discussion at hand though.The point is that certain wavelengths show a degree of reflection off of the ionosphere, we agree on this correct? It follows then that a range greater then could be achieved without reflection is possible correct?

    I'm not sure I understand your last point, are you saying that if the ionoshpere reflects then how did the radio signals escape? The ionosphere is not a perfect reflector, a portion of the wave is reflected and a portion is transmitted.

    --
    Building a better backup.
    Zettabyte Storage
  214. Re: can we expect... by raytracer · · Score: 1
    Ham Radio will interfere with it severely, and there won't be a damn thing the provider can do because it's under FCC part 15, which must accept any harmful interference, especially from PROPERLY LICENSED services.

    Since hams are only licensed for modes which consume narrow bandwidths under 30mhz, it's highly unlikely that any amount of activity by hams could result in disruption of broadband service delivered over phone lines, at least any legal activity.

    I'd also work on your rhetoric: there are a heck of a lot more people out there who want broadband than want to become hams. When push comes to shove, the FCC is likely to take their benefit (and frankly, the dollars that the resulting market signfies) over those of the tiny minority that are hams.

    Frankly, I hope this dies as well, because there are undoubtably far more creative uses for HF spectrum than to allow it to be merely sapped as an incidental casualty, but I think the case for ham radio as a "creative use" falls a bit short.

  215. Re: can we expect... by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    For many broadband over the powerlines may be the only way to get connected to the information age. I hope, for these peoples sake, that the broadband via powerlines isn't curtailed and that Ham operators are forced to find ways to not interfere with those services.

    Ever try to run ethernet over telephone wires?
    Over long distances?

    Now add a few thousand volts to the brew.
    Methinks you'd have better luck with tin cans and string.

  216. This has been questioned for many years now... by grolschie · · Score: 1

    and they leave out "to be", for instance, "the carpet needs swept".

    "To be" or not "To be" that is the question. :-)

  217. Ahead of times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think your town gets ahead of the times? It's so typical people in US forget that the rest 95% of population in the world is OUTSIDE of US. It think the broadband over power lines is not that new for rest of the world. For example here in Finland there are multiple companies offering real broadband (even up to 4,5 Mbps) of power lines (for example www.dsturku.fi or http://www.kuopionenergia.fi/). And those are usually around 30 euros / mo.

    Another thing is that people in US tend to think 256kbps as broad band. In my home town typical broadband connection is 8Mbps (downstream, 1Mbps upstream) or 10/10 Mbps (that's up and downstream). Price for such connection starts from 29euros/mo (~33USD/mo). Technology for such connections is VDSL. Im looking forward for new versions of VDSL which will increase the speed to 20/20 Mbps. Here you can even have 100mbps connection in some areas.

  218. Cincinatti SUCKS ASS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but the cultural center of ohio is Cleveland. Cincinatti is populated by a bunch of rednex with no class or education. If it really were a decent town, the Robert Mapplethorpe exhibits in the 80s would have been no big deal. The town wouldn't have the big smear of being very segregated and full of white supremacist racist assholes. And maybe... just maybe, they'd have a prayer of getting half the culture that Cleveland has. The biggest problem with any towns south of Independence, Ohio is that there aren't many jewish people down south. The Jewish community is largely what makes Cleveland such a culturally rish town. Or at least it did, until out fucking worthless shit head of a governor started gutting our funding in deference to the loser city that is our state capital: Columbus. That fucking ass of a governor didn't even have the decency to break away from his vacation when we were in a blackout last August. You know that if Columbus was affected, he'd be back in a heartbeat. I can't wait to vote that fucking butterfaced goon out of office. Heads are gonna roll in November...

  219. You're all forgetting by slycer9 · · Score: 1

    That not only Amateur Operators (of which I am proudly one) are on the HF bands...

    Truckers. Thousands of them.

    What's the difference you ask?

    Amateur equipment is designed to a MUCH higher standard than CB equipment. Ever hear those truckers bragging about their 'linears'?
    Crappy imported, cheap built power amplifiers (unauthorized on the CB band, but irrelevant for my point.)

    Now imagine all that 'dirty' HF being thrown into the BPL mix. Heh, I'm not even grumbling about the illegal radio wielding truckers anymore...they're fighting my fight and don't even know it!

    --
    Don't park drunk, accidents cause people.
  220. People don't get it by DF5JT · · Score: 1

    This issue is not about ham radio, it is about worldwide communication. Let me point out just some of the services that depend on shortwave communication and let me also give you some background on shortwave propagation itself:

    Shortwave propagation is not line of sight communication, it is global. An RF signal transmitted in Cincinnati can easily be picked anywhere. Shortwave signals are reflected on the ionosphere and they are propagated on different paths, depending on season, time of day, frequency and direction of RF energy.

    That makes it a global issue, not a local issue.

    Ham Radio only uses a tiny portion of the entire shortwave spectrum. Other radio services use the spectrum as well and some of them are exclusively depending on it:

    - Military
    - Broadcast stations
    - Emergency communications
    - Embassies all over the world
    - Offshore oil rigs, ships
    - Aviation
    - Time Synchronization
    - Scientific Observation (Magnetic field of the earth, Sunspots, Atmosphere etc.)
    - Intelligence Agencies
    - Satellite communication (Yes, there are shortwave satellites)
    - Digital broadcasting

    Contrary to widesp^WSlashdot belief, commercial satellites are not the solution to every communication problem. One of the issues is independence. While shortwave communication is point-to-point, a satellite adds an unwanted layer of dependency on communications and terms of use of a commercial entity.

    Please, please, please understand that a shortwave radio signal does not stop at some man made border. It travels all over the planet, affects *billions* of people (No, I am not exaggerating) and their access to information and in many cases is the only way to communicate with remote places on earth.

    A ship in a storm cannot use a satellite, neither can an Antarctic research station amidst a storm. Satellite antennas need to be calibrated very, very precisely and that is impossible in rough weather conditions. People can *DIE* when they cannot communicate and while it may be nice to have broadband access everywhere, there are other solutions to provide that and these solutions may even do a lot less harm to people's live than a technology that effectively can kill worldwide shortwave communication.

    As I said, it is NOT about ham radio.

  221. Upstream by Trinition · · Score: 1

    ...and they doubled the upstream from 384kbps to 768kbps. From what I hear, cable (RoadRunner) only has something like 128kbpos or 256kbps upstream. Can anyone confirm or deny?

    What is the upstream of this 1Mbit powerline broadband?

    1. Re:Upstream by Trinition · · Score: 1

      "What is the upstream of this 1Mbit powerline broadband?"

      Doh! Nevermind. 1MBit. RTFA.

  222. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where did you learn about RF communications again?

  223. Re: can we expect... by ACorvus · · Score: 1

    They can reach the other side of the earth - because they can bounce back and forth between the ionosphere and earth. It's quite feasible to recieve a signal of a few watts from, say, Japan in the UK, especially around twilight.

    --
    -- Sig Sig Sputnik
  224. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are there /so/ many posts in this discussion from people that have no idea what they are talking about?

    For gods sake, this is not 60Hz, and not induction. This is about powerlines acting as antennas and radiating signals from 3-50MHz.

    Sheesh.

  225. Re: can we expect... by ACorvus · · Score: 1

    Yes, it is a problem. The frequencies used by BPL are capable of propagating half-way around the world, so that Ham in the middle of nowhere may well not be able to hear /anybody/ by the time BPL is widespread.

    --
    -- Sig Sig Sputnik
  226. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah but if you continue to "cool" water in the sense of removing internal energy from it by some thermodynamic process, you will break the activation energy barrier for crystal formation and lose your meta-stable state... (also if you were to give it a slight amount of energy that could effectively tip it to the other side of the potential) Running high frequency signals along unshielded copper lines spanning kilometers and hoping not to get interference with signals in it's communication bandwidth is at the very least deluded. Running a "research group" to investigate this is even worse. It true shows what kind of a world we live in where "authority" over-rides plain common sense and electrodynamics.

  227. Re: can we expect... by cherokee158 · · Score: 1

    Yes, but...in a real emergency, there wouldn't be much RF interference, would there?

  228. Wake me when they offer... by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  229. Performance? by baggachipz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, the article says that it's got 1mbps symmetrical, which is huge. But, what kind of latency will we be talking about here? After all, that's what really matters in games. Any new subscribers/beta testers want to pipe up?

  230. Re: can we expect... by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    some other posters mentioned it already, but the longer wavelengths are readily reflected from the ionosphere... this atmospheric bounce is what allows hams to communicate across huge distances.

    If the BPL interference gets propogated the same way we're in big trouble (disclaimer: I'm a HAM operator)

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  231. Re: can we expect... by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

    Ham radio? What about solar activity? If solar storms create surges and spikes on the line, how is that dealt with? Same question with lightning... Cinci gets plenty of *that* in the spring and summer.

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  232. Logical Next Step by theslashdude · · Score: 1

    The logical next step for this technology is broadband over batteries. That way you can keep surfing away even after you unplug your laptop from the power line.

  233. Emergency Situations by supersmike · · Score: 1

    I wonder if, in emergency situations like those described above, we could convince the power companies to disable BPL temporarily. Of course, that doesn't solve the long-term issue, but it would at least help out in emergency situations.

    1. Re:Emergency Situations by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      This problem was discussed in the last iteration of the BPL postings, but basically, the ham operators train regularly, if radios only work during outages, then training is worthless and when the time comes the operators will be worthless too.

    2. Re:Emergency Situations by supersmike · · Score: 1
      if radios only work during outages, then training is worthless and when the time comes the operators will be worthless too

      Yeah, I kinda figured on that - that's why I said it's certainly not a long-term solution. It just seems like the juggernaut that is big business cannot be stopped (at least not while Dubya is in office). This situation definitely sounds like we're aiming to shoot ourselves in the foot. It seems crazy that the FCC is allowing this.

    3. Re:Emergency Situations by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, im not sure that any president would stop this. I think the bulk of it is the FCC not caring.

  234. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, though if I were your next door neighbor and this service really is that good, my next project would probably be a herf gun.

  235. THE CHILI PEOPLE!!! by -O.ster_66 · · Score: 1
    lets not forget the cincinatti chili. i live in NY and have to order it online

    on a serious note, does that mean that the power company would have its own switching system? i don't know how things work ;)

    --
    "You get all the fun of sitting still, being quiet, writing down numbers, paying attention...science has it all."
  236. Re: can we expect... by part15guy · · Score: 1
    I tried posting earlier to get more information, but nobody responded. I still don't understand how these devices received a grant from a functional perspective.

    Even if a "lab queen" was used, how did they manage to stay below the FCC part 15.107 / 207 limits for powerline conducted emissions? The lab queen still has to have the same circuit design as the device that will be marketed. Lab queens are only supposed to allow for relaxations due to manufacturing variability.

    On what frequency are they operating? If they are below 30MHz, then are they taking a risk by staying below the part 15 powerline conducted limits? Even if they are above 30MHz, I would still think that they would have trouble testing a device to the 15.109 / 209 radiated limits.

    Did they receive a waiver to allow this or are they just so far down in the mud that any unintentional radiator can stomp them out?

  237. Re: can we expect... by morie · · Score: 1

    People die if you shoot them???? I can't just believe that! Do you have any independent research to prove that?

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  238. So - Is there a problem or not by HBergeron · · Score: 1

    BPL has been running to thousands of homes in Virginia for a year now. Have there been the dire consequences that the Ham folks here are predicting? Can Argentina still use HF? Are the many military bases in the area left without their wireless equipment? Has northern Virginia become a big Ham black hole? Inquiring minds want to know.

    If not, let's try to encourage competition and innovation and stop crying about the falling sky until we actually have some real world evidence that it's falling - and yes I know about the dozen papers and studies cited above - that's why I'm asking if ANY of them hold water given the fact that the tecnology now exists in the real world.

    --
    THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal...
  239. they have improved... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    I didn't see the tape of the last killing (I don't watch much TV) but the police seemed to have a situation that would have been hard for any police force. The problem is that Cin. has had an awful lot of shootings with (in hindsight) very little cause; they just happened to be black people killed by police. Columbus (where I live) is somewhat similar in size, has a (somewhat) competent police force but has seen nowhere near the same problem with killing the wrong people. We are not on the border between North and South and probably have less of a history of direct racial issues, so that the ability of the police force is likely not the only contributor to the difference. Cincinnati police are getting better from what little I know; unfortunately they have a deep hole to crawl out of.

    1. Re:they have improved... by swiggidy · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally, I know live in Columbus. I was trying to say that I don't think it much to do with racial problems, and more from the fact that it's a crime ridden area. I've been getting right-to-know e-mails from UC (university of Cincinanti) and there were six armed robberies over the weekend just around campus. This is a couple miles away from the 'bad part' of town.

      I guess there's nowhere in Columbus that I'm worried about driving through in the middle of the day. There are such places in Cincinnati.

  240. it doesn't unless you go there... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    There a lots of nice things in Cincinnati, but lots of things that annoy when I go there. Hence, my post. The tax doesn't affect unless you go there, in which case you will pay a little for them. Not a big deal; I just don't like stupidity.

  241. One of my favorite lines of all time.... by grgyle · · Score: 1

    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!"

    --
    ----- And all that the Lorax left here in this mess was a small pile of rocks, with one word...UNLESS.
    1. Re:One of my favorite lines of all time.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're hitting the ground like bags of wet cement!

  242. makes sense... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    I wasn't thinking of that; it makes sense to some degree (more crime is likely to make life harder on the police who are likely to have less time to deal with individual threats). I've never lived in an area like that (I lived in Boston, and other than stupid high schoolers playing games with knives, and theft, we didn't see that much crime on campus; I lived in suburban NJ, so I didn't worry there), so I don't know how to deal with it.

  243. Re: can we expect... by dbc · · Score: 1

    So far, they are *not* Part 15 certified. They are operating under an experimental license, NOT part 15, because there is no way they can pass the current Part 15 requirements, especially with respect to being "intermittent" emitters. They are continuous. The BPL industry is trying to get a change in Part 15 to make them legal under Part 15 -- at this point they are not and are therefor licensed. They are broadband from 1500 KHz or so (upper end of AM BC) to about 80 MHz.

    BTW -- just in case anyone is still reading this story, it is not just hams that are upset. Shortwave broadcasters are upset -- you can write off being able to hear them in a BPL neighborhood. Also all the military/embassy/commercial/ship-to-shore users in the hf spectrum.

  244. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1500kHz-80MHz. That's some experimental license. How much power are they conducting onto the powerlines?

    Thanks for following up.

  245. Re: can we expect... by part15guy · · Score: 1
    1500kHz-80MHz. That's some experimental license. How much power are they conducting onto the powerlines?

    Thanks for following up.

    Sorry for the repeat - just sending a more "on the record" reply so that I am notified of a response.

  246. Re: can we expect... by LandGator · · Score: 1

    May I suggest you visit the web site of the Radio Society of Great Britain
    http://www.rsgb.org/emc/pltnew.htm

    and review their findings? After that, there's FEMA
    http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/36294

    and NTIA
    http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/31543

    reports to read.

    And. the FCC is not doing any of the 'hard work' here. It's the Enron-inspired power companies vs. three-quarters of a million US hams, the vast majority of which have never even met a lobbyist much less hired them by the dozen.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  247. It's the ionosphere. by LandGator · · Score: 1

    Sorry, no. As Scotty says, 'ye canna change tha laws o' physics.'

    1. AM. FM, PCM, all irrelevant: The modulation method is _irrelevant_ to the issue. What's relevant is *frequency* and its inverse, the *wavelength*.

    2. Yes, the HF wavelengths used by commerical broadcasters modulating amplitude will travel further via groundwave than the VHF wavelengths used by broadcasters modulating frequency.

    3. However, neither is relevant, because the HF ('shortwave', so named when longer waves were used) wavelenghts are valuable because they bound off the ionosphere, allowing 'bank shots' to points of the earth you will never reach by LOS or groundwave. The F and F2 layers are the friend of long-range radio, whether amateur, aviation, nautical or military, because you can bounce a 5w signal off the insider of the ionosphere and communicate all over the planet... until BPL jams those wavelengths.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  248. Re: can we expect... by dbc · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure about the amount of power. I gather that they are using "enough" to get to the Part 15 emmissions limit (which is pretty large, if you are a nearby shortwave receiver) and are seeking waivers to the Part 15 duty cycle limit. It's the duty cycle that makes this such a problem. A short burst of interference would have about the same impact as a static crash. BPL would be like living in a 24x7 severe thunderstorm. It would raise the HF noise floor in my neighborhood by 60dB to 70dB or so. No more Voice of America, no more BBC World Service. KFS would not hear any more ships in the Pacific Ocean.

  249. Isolated cases? by LandGator · · Score: 1

    Well, gee whiz, I was one of those isolated cases two months ago... delivering medical personnel to hospital, with ham 2-way radio my sole reliable link of communication as to who to get and when to get them, as those 'pocket radios' you mention overload when as few as 3% of all their users try to use them.

    Cellular's the first thing to crash in an emergency, and landline phone is the second, as a former telephone switchman (United of Florida), I can assure you that phone systems do overload and crash when a very small fraction of all the landlines try to get dial tone.

    Want to wait an hour for a dial tone? Well, go ahead.

    Oh, yes, BTW, it's dial tone which connects you to 911. That, or the ham down your block who trains up, knows how to talk to the hospitals and fire stations, and how to get a message through when all else fails.

    Our infrastructure is tremendously fragile, and folks who don't work in telecom are blissfully unaware of how quickly it will fail them.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  250. it is in use in many places in the world.? by LandGator · · Score: 1

    Would you care to name a few?

    Japan just completely rejected it. Funny, doesn't Japan lead the electronics industry?

    Austria just put their trial on hold because of their interference problems.

    Where else, eh?

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  251. Impractical by LandGator · · Score: 1

    BPL uses frequencies which bounce off the F and F2 layers of the ionosphere. Those are the same frequencies used for long-range radio, voice, morse, packet and other digital modes.

    So, when I have a local emergency, can I count on getting every other BPL operator everywhere in the world to shut down so I can communicate? Including, say, Cuba and Iran, places which have no reason to love us?

    Kindly recheck your assumptions.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  252. Ham radio NEQ Dinosaur by LandGator · · Score: 1

    1A). If there's an emergency, then BPL systems hundred, thousands of miles away can interfere with my ability to receive.

    1B). BPL anywhere can interfere with my ability to receive media which have not been censored by routers, gateways and other government-monitored information systems. Shortwave radio allows any body to tell their story. Do you trust your media? Are they 'Fair And Balanced'? How do you know? Ans: Listen to lots of other media. BPL and its ability to block international shortwave will further reduce our already monocultural media.

    2A). Yes, something may replace it; but it won't work as well nor will it be accessible as a hunk o' wire and tranceiver which can be homebuilt.

    2B). Whatever replaces it will be Aschroft-Approved(TM).

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  253. Local repeaters no substitute for HF by LandGator · · Score: 1

    Yes, local repeaters will work fine; but, then, these BPL proposals were designed not to interfere with them. Those use VHF and UHF bands.

    The problem is with the HF bands we need to send signals a long distance, by bouncing off the inner ionosphere. BPL uses HF frequencies and will have the entire grid transmitting on those bands.

    I would not say power companies are going out of their way to kill long-distance, uncontrolled free radio, no, no siree, Mr. Ashcroft.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  254. Hilarious. by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 1

    You proved yourself to be a redneck, uneducated, and racist in the same post that you denounced the same. Bravo! I think I'll avoid Cleveland and try some Cincinnati chili....

    1. Re:Hilarious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you bitch. I didn't say anything racist in my post. If anything, I was discouraging the racism that is rampant in the southern part of the state. People in Columbus and Cincinatti as well as all the other small, worthless burgs down there have no tolerance for jewish peopel of black people. Now THAT is racist. It's OK to hate stupid white people because they are the problem. So to quote the great /. quote: FUCK OFF AND DIE!!!!

  255. Re: can we expect... by part15guy · · Score: 1
    What duty cycling are you referring to? From my understanding, the FCC powerline conducted limits are:

    emission (MHz) ... Quasi-peak ... Average
    0.15-0.5 .......... 66 to 56* ........ 56 to 46*
    0.5-5 ................... 56 .................. 46
    5-30 .................... 60 .................. 50

    * Decreases with the logarithm of the frequency.

    I guess there is some duty cycle relaxation with the averaging or QP measurements, but even a real peak measurement below these limits passes. What rule specifically are you talking about?

  256. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the Ham's next project would, rightfully, be enticing federal agents to visit you...

  257. Part 15 limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    For now, they are subject to the same Part 15 regulations as other carrier-current systems. The problems are:

    The system will blanket all frequencies in the range rather than a few spots. You can't find a clear spot with no interference; the interference is everywhere.

    Power lines are pervasive and unmovable (see your computer manual's interference section: "Relocate the equipment...use a different circuit...turn the power off"...all impossible with BPL).

    The conducted emissions limits assume normal indoor wiring, with close spaced cables or wires in conduit. These are very inefficient radiators for differential mode signals (which BPL uses). But overhead power lines will radiate differential mode signals very effectively; in fact they are likely to have considerable gain at the higher frequencies (where line spacing exceeds a quarter wavelength).

    The Part 15 limits (and the VDE0871 limits which preceded them) were never intended to completely protect against interference. When the regulations were drafted, digital devices were rare and expensive. The regulations were drawn to protect high power broadcast signals in metropolitan areas, with signal strengths of 1mV/m and higher. The assumption that such equipment would be kept away from sensitive receivers of extremely weak signals (1uV/m or even less). That asumption is destroyed by BPL; interference will be unavoidable.

  258. Re: the quote in your sig by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1
    Hey SatanicPuppy, where'd you get that quote for your sig? Google has only one other reference to it, on a post from a guy calling himself "vDopple". It was also unattributed on that page.

    Did you make it up yourself? It sounds like something Twain, Churchill, or P.J. O'Rourke might have said.

    In any case, I want to steal it as a sig for my personal email. If you're the author, how should I attribute it? As "Slashdot user #611928"?

  259. Re: can we expect... by part15guy · · Score: 1

    Hey dbc, Any thoughts on my previous post? I still am trying to find out what duty cycle limits we are talking about here. Knowing this could help me determine worst case powerline emissions levels. I would like to have my company's products tested for conducted RF suceptibility testing before the comments deadline approaches on the BPL NPRM. This would allow me to determine if I need to submit comments (on my company's behalf, not my own) to the NPRM. However, I have no clue what these levels might be with this type of equipment because, at the moment, it is illegal. Any information would be helpful.

  260. Re: can we expect... by dbc · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry I am not up on the details. It is my understanding that Part 15 powerline devices that are "unintentional radiators" are only allowed to transmit intermittently. Think garage door opener. But I am not an expert on the exact %age of the time they are allowed to be key-down, I expect the exact limit varies with frequency and power level. Sorry I can't be more help.

  261. Re: can we expect... by part15guy · · Score: 1

    Actually, the limits are the ones that I sent in the previous post.

    Example:
    You can have a CW signal at 25 MHz coupled on the power line as long as it is no stronger than 60dBuV. There is no "duty cylcle limit", but there is a relaxation when using a quasi-peak detector (or average detector with a 50dBuV limit).

  262. Bandwidth capacity (low!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not just protected "by law". It's protected by a treaty ratified by the US. That makes teh treaty, in combination with the US constitution, the "supreme law of the land". If BPL causes any interference to hams in other countris, such as those in Vancouver BC and Tijuana Mexico, then the interference must be eliminated. The FCC cannot ignore the treaty without repercussions. And countries that rely on short-wave broadcast to reach audiences (both foreign and domestic )*will* raise objections. The USA complained about jamming of Radio Free Europe, Radio Marti, etc. Other nations will remember that, and will be happy to respond to BPL in a like manner.

  263. Re: the quote in your sig by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    Heh. I thought I made it up...

    At any rate, you can attribute it to the Satanicpuppy. My real name doesn't actually show UP on the internet.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  264. Re: the quote in your sig by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1
    Assuming you own something, rent an apartment, have a job, or have a credit card, I'll bet your real name is out there somewhere on the Internet. ;-)

    Equifax, TransUnion, Lexis-Nexis, et. all. charge for many web-based searches, but you can still find out an alarming amount about someone by posing as a potential creditor and paying the fees.

  265. Re: can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need porno. Pictures of bitches serving a white man, getting goo on their faces is important to this country. And other countries do not have a right to complain or we will attack them, except for Germany of course.