this isnt the first time the GPl has been violated. many folks have modified GPLed programs and not ditributed the source with their mods.
what i say is its about time someone comes along and does it openly. i hope they'll go to court about it. we need a precedent to be set that will show everyone else what can/cannot be done with GPLed stuff!
I understand what you are saying, and you would be right, if your facts were correct.
0 4/ 10/15/242966.aspx
They are not. In fact, IIS6 has had *way* less security exploits avalible than Apache. Check this out:
http://blogs.msdn.com/michael_howard/archive/20
Acutally, this originally posted by Benjamin Tobias Franz to bugtraq on Oct 28th:
0 04 -10-27/2004-11-02/2
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/379764/2
Thus the credit goes to Benjamin, not Netcraft.
What features will be included in windows for warships? My wish list includes: -Drag and drop cruise missles -Point, click, BOOM anti-aircraft guns
If you want to know more 'bout this nanotechnology that everyone's talking about: Institute of Nanotechnology and National Nanotechnology Initiative
this isnt the first time the GPl has been violated. many folks have modified GPLed programs and not ditributed the source with their mods.
what i say is its about time someone comes along and does it openly. i hope they'll go to court about it. we need a precedent to be set that will show everyone else what can/cannot be done with GPLed stuff!
hey folks, this was posted to bugtraq some two months ago.
occur that could compromise the High Value
and/or Highest Value data class.
since when did we think microsoft was secure any
ways? is it news that people can get into
microsoft's systems?
all i say is:
a computer without a microsoft operating system
is like a dog without bricks tied to its
head.