The free shipping/$3.99 overnight is only available if you purchase directly from Amazon. i.e. it is not available if you purchase from third party Amazon Marketplace or zShops sellers.
For many items, Amazon is actually competing with third party sellers that are selling on their site. This new service might be the incentive necessary for many people to not buy from third party sellers, but to only buy from Amazon which will result in more money for them. That could be one of the reasons behind introducing Amazon Prime.
The solution is going to have to be technological, not regulatory.
I disagree. That's like saying, "we should not use the law against bug-exploiting black hat hackers, but instead we should build bug free programs."
Bug free programs will never exist. Likewise, there is always going to be some way to sneak spam past all the technological filters we create. If there is not some legal consequence, people will just keep doing it.
Netcraft is reporting this too. Check out there story here.
I wonder if the fact that several Internet backbones were blocking Lycos's site had anything to do with them finally deciding to pull it.
My guess is simply that this was creating too much bad publicity. Everyone was talking about how Lycos was using unethical tactics to try to stop spam. Lycos probably figured it was not worth it.
Actually, some splash screens are good for something. Think about Java programs that have to be runtime compiled, they usually take long times to load. In a case like that, a splash screen is extremely useful.
Interesting to note that Windows XP SP2 is immune. Only old Windows versions are vulnerable. I think its pretty pointless to keep pointing out that OUTDATED products have bugs.
I am glad you pointed out that this is about manual exploits, NOT about which OS has the best security. If we were talking strictly about vulnerbility the story would be quite different. Quite simply, Mac OS would lose (IMHO):
http://www.computerweekly.com/articles/article.asp ?liArticleID=131513&liArticleTypeID=1&liCategoryID =2&liChannelID=22&liFlavourID=1&sSearch=&nPage =1
Here is a post from an insider giving some of his oppinions about what's going on:
http://media.orkut.com/articles/0100.html
The free shipping/$3.99 overnight is only available if you purchase directly from Amazon. i.e. it is not available if you purchase from third party Amazon Marketplace or zShops sellers.
For many items, Amazon is actually competing with third party sellers that are selling on their site. This new service might be the incentive necessary for many people to not buy from third party sellers, but to only buy from Amazon which will result in more money for them. That could be one of the reasons behind introducing Amazon Prime.
...its gone from about 130 errors when it was first released, to eight errors now. Not bad. Not bad at all.
...compliant
For those that don't know, Wikipedia has a nice article explaining man-in-the-middle attacks.
While we are on the topic of pics of Bill Gates, has anyone else seen his mug shots?
The solution is going to have to be technological, not regulatory.
I disagree. That's like saying, "we should not use the law against bug-exploiting black hat hackers, but instead we should build bug free programs."
Bug free programs will never exist. Likewise, there is always going to be some way to sneak spam past all the technological filters we create. If there is not some legal consequence, people will just keep doing it.
Just MHO. What do you think?
iHope iCan get one!
Only the buffer overflow issue has been fixed! This article on the Register should clear things up:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/07/mozilla_fl aws/
Only the buffer overflow issue has been fixed! This article on the Register should clear things up:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/07/mozilla_fl aws/
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june01/iannella/06iannell a.html
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_rights_managThe official EPA Global Warming website is located at: www.epa.gov/globalwarming/
Netcraft is reporting this too. Check out there story here. I wonder if the fact that several Internet backbones were blocking Lycos's site had anything to do with them finally deciding to pull it. My guess is simply that this was creating too much bad publicity. Everyone was talking about how Lycos was using unethical tactics to try to stop spam. Lycos probably figured it was not worth it.
Here is more about XORP (the Extensible Open Router Platform), for those that don't know.
Here is the article announcing the beginning of the competition. May be interesting.
...they are beta testing a new IE based browser.
Actually, some splash screens are good for something. Think about Java programs that have to be runtime compiled, they usually take long times to load. In a case like that, a splash screen is extremely useful.
You can find out more about GIMP splash screens
For those that dont know, here for about this 'EA controversy':
http://www.livejournal.com/users/ea_spouse/
Interesting to note that Windows XP SP2 is immune. Only old Windows versions are vulnerable. I think its pretty pointless to keep pointing out that OUTDATED products have bugs.
The official site is located here.
More about HCL Principles can be found here
The official site about this laser is here
http://www.computerweekly.com/articles/article.asp ?liArticleID=131513&liArticleTypeID=1&liCategoryID =2&liChannelID=22&liFlavourID=1&sSearch=&nPage =1
I am glad you pointed out that this is about manual exploits, NOT about which OS has the best security. If we were talking strictly about vulnerbility the story would be quite different. Quite simply, Mac OS would lose (IMHO): http://www.computerweekly.com/articles/article.asp ?liArticleID=131513&liArticleTypeID=1&liCategoryID =2&liChannelID=22&liFlavourID=1&sSearch=&nPage =1