AFAIK, Tony Blair et al. (including Cherie) will be there... so you can rely on their ever-beaming big-grin smiles instead of our unpredictable weather.
Hmm, in which case... set it so that the focused beam returns to the source;)
I don't know Perl, but it certainly ins't JavaScript, JavaScript (now ECMAScript) is based off the Java syntax, which in turn is based off C++.
So it would be:
function BrowserDetect() {
if (Browser != "Firefox") {
RedirectBrowser("www.getfirefox.com");
} }
Which it isn't:)
I suspect the parent was just writing psuedo-code.
Its automatically inserted by Dreamweaver 4 (not usually MX or MX 2004) when you use the "Timeline" feature or add an absolutely positioned element to the page.
"height: 100%;" only works when an element has a parent with absolute height. You need to set "body { min-height: 100%; }" first.
Of course, CSS2.1 still does have short-comings where are the only viable way to achieve a particular aesthetic effect. But I stress this is in the minority of cases, and there's almost always workarounds.
Just remember kids! "If in doubt, do without!"
a) Using CSS instead of the tag actually uses less code if you need that "font style" a lot in a page or website.
b) XHTML is based of XML, therefore all XML rules (including code termination) must be met. If you've got a problem with this, go back to SGML based HTML4.01 which allows this
c) In CSS you can have a
as wide as its content, use: "width: 0; overflow: visible;"
Full height-sidebars? "height: 100%;"
d) Attribute="value"s have to be completed in order to comply with XML spec, as I said earlier, SGML-based HTML4.01 is more flexible....And you forgot to close your element properly;)
The W3C Standards exist for a reason and many are devised by people who, lets face it, are waaaay smarter than both you and I. If you've got a problem with this, then join one of the W3C Working-Group Mailing lists and ask them yourself.
Woo & yay! reply #4
Its hard to think of something witty to say in such little timespan, but maybe MS will maybe release IE7 within our lifetimes, and maybe... just maybe... make it so that it actually works!
Slashdot Mirror
Law Enforcement can gain access to safety deposit boxes, so your plan is slightly flawed there.
Wouldn't the more hardened criminals use "real" passwords (such as a memorized GUID) encypted with 4096-bit encoding?
Or better yet...
Removable hard-drives!
AFAIK, Tony Blair et al. (including Cherie) will be there... so you can rely on their ever-beaming big-grin smiles instead of our unpredictable weather. Hmm, in which case... set it so that the focused beam returns to the source ;)
Looks more like Fortran to me. != isn't a VB/VBS comparison operator But then again Fortran doesn't have "Sub", does it?
Its automatically inserted by Dreamweaver 4 (not usually MX or MX 2004) when you use the "Timeline" feature or add an absolutely positioned element to the page.
:)
Still, not as bad as FrontPage
"height: 100%;" only works when an element has a parent with absolute height. You need to set "body { min-height: 100%; }" first. Of course, CSS2.1 still does have short-comings where are the only viable way to achieve a particular aesthetic effect. But I stress this is in the minority of cases, and there's almost always workarounds. Just remember kids! "If in doubt, do without!"
a) Using CSS instead of the tag actually uses less code if you need that "font style" a lot in a page or website.
;)
b) XHTML is based of XML, therefore all XML rules (including code termination) must be met. If you've got a problem with this, go back to SGML based HTML4.01 which allows this
c) In CSS you can have a as wide as its content, use: "width: 0; overflow: visible;"
Full height-sidebars? "height: 100%;"
d) Attribute="value"s have to be completed in order to comply with XML spec, as I said earlier, SGML-based HTML4.01 is more flexible....And you forgot to close your element properly
The W3C Standards exist for a reason and many are devised by people who, lets face it, are waaaay smarter than both you and I. If you've got a problem with this, then join one of the W3C Working-Group Mailing lists and ask them yourself.
Woo & yay! reply #4 Its hard to think of something witty to say in such little timespan, but maybe MS will maybe release IE7 within our lifetimes, and maybe... just maybe... make it so that it actually works!