Nokia has almost no cdmaOne/CDMA2000 phones Keyword *almost*.
Oh, you want a *choice*. I see;)
I would also imagine that this would change, if there were a sudden market for them. I notice that Nokia CEO claims the market isn't viable (for them) and that's the reason - of course that was a couple of years ago, so things are undoubtedly different these days.
If this move is as it seems, then I guess it will change a lot of things. I guess we'll have to wait and see.
Well, I have to apologise to everyone here. Even if you are all wrong to assume the woman is guilty, it is entirely reasonable to do so (IMO) considering the complexity of the whole thing.
What's to stop you from implementing this on a Symbian platform?
The SDK is free and I'm fairly sure you can do that sort of functionality. Of course, you have the SymbianSigned gauntlet to go through, and you will if you want to do that sort of thing, but I would say it's possible.
Well, I don't know what 'indicted' means - it's one of those many words that I only encounter in the US.
I should look it up, I suppose....ah, here we go :
" 1. To accuse of wrongdoing; charge: a book that indicts modern values.
2. Law. To make a formal accusation or indictment against (a party) by the findings of a jury, especially a grand jury."
I am now assuming we're not talking about (1), but about (2) - ie the jury has already been involved and has found her guilty. What's the difference between 'indicted' and 'guilty' then, I wonder?
..and why all the pussy footing around in the article, if they have been found guilty already? Surely this isn't still 'alleged' if she's been found guilty already.
Clearly, I know very little about US law (or any law, I guess).
They start with the minimal specs you quote (I think) and they tend to scale quite well, so I'm lead to believe, in case you increase the size of your family and/or circle of friends...and they start at a very reasonable price, I'm sure.
I read 'into' your post stuff you didn't write - ie that the *only reason* for putting 'alleged' is for the paper to avoid libel charges.
Of course this isn't the case. The term 'alleged' actually means something, and that is that she hasn't been found guilty yet. It seems that the majority (all? apart from mine) of posts here have assumed she's guilty already.
She does actually deny the charges, if I read it correctly. People don't seem to consider that she's telling the truth.
I suspect... Yes, but it would be nice to actually know. All he gave is "Now, the time has come to consider a replacement.", to which my first thought was "why?", and my second is, "why not just leave it well alone and let it do the job it's been doing just fine for so long?".
I think knowing why the existing equipment is no longer good enough is actually very good information to have when recommending a replacement.
Slashdot Mirror
Oh, you want a *choice*. I see
I would also imagine that this would change, if there were a sudden market for them. I notice that Nokia CEO claims the market isn't viable (for them) and that's the reason - of course that was a couple of years ago, so things are undoubtedly different these days.
If this move is as it seems, then I guess it will change a lot of things. I guess we'll have to wait and see.
Your point being?
Perhaps the Gates' would be interested if they ported Windows to the Enigma machine, or, at the very least, develop a Enigma simulator for Windows.
OK, I think.
Well, I have to apologise to everyone here. Even if you are all wrong to assume the woman is guilty, it is entirely reasonable to do so (IMO) considering the complexity of the whole thing.
What's to stop you from implementing this on a Symbian platform?
The SDK is free and I'm fairly sure you can do that sort of functionality. Of course, you have the SymbianSigned gauntlet to go through, and you will if you want to do that sort of thing, but I would say it's possible.
I think Nokia might sell you one.
ah, now it makes some sense :)
So, she's not been found guilty yet...
Well, I don't know what 'indicted' means - it's one of those many words that I only encounter in the US.
..and why all the pussy footing around in the article, if they have been found guilty already? Surely this isn't still 'alleged' if she's been found guilty already.
I should look it up, I suppose....ah, here we go :
" 1. To accuse of wrongdoing; charge: a book that indicts modern values.
2. Law. To make a formal accusation or indictment against (a party) by the findings of a jury, especially a grand jury."
I am now assuming we're not talking about (1), but about (2) - ie the jury has already been involved and has found her guilty. What's the difference between 'indicted' and 'guilty' then, I wonder?
Clearly, I know very little about US law (or any law, I guess).
I recommend an SGI server :
http://www.sgi.com/products/servers/
They start with the minimal specs you quote (I think) and they tend to scale quite well, so I'm lead to believe, in case you increase the size of your family and/or circle of friends...and they start at a very reasonable price, I'm sure.
Hrm...ok, so there is more to this than in the linked story. Fair enough, I guess....
OK. Fair enough. I apologise.
I read 'into' your post stuff you didn't write - ie that the *only reason* for putting 'alleged' is for the paper to avoid libel charges.
Of course this isn't the case. The term 'alleged' actually means something, and that is that she hasn't been found guilty yet. It seems that the majority (all? apart from mine) of posts here have assumed she's guilty already.
She does actually deny the charges, if I read it correctly. People don't seem to consider that she's telling the truth.
I would also like to recommend http://www.mini-itx.com/ which I've used for various bits in the past.
I think knowing why the existing equipment is no longer good enough is actually very good information to have when recommending a replacement.
So, it's ok to assume she's guilty?
What's the point in indicting her then? Why not just do an old-fashioned lynching?
Wow. I understand all the words, but not when used in that way.
No wonder religion is more popular than science.
Am I missing something?
Everyone's talking about it like she's been found guilty already. Has the case been judged on already and I missed it?
If my reading is correct, it is all 'alleged' at this point. I'm sure I read that she denied it; yes, this is what it says :
"Drew has denied creating the account or sending messages to Megan"
I'll be interested in what happens in 'court' or whatever the next step is (I don't understand the US legalese, eg "Indicted").
Interesting that my post gets modded 'off-topic', but the reply to my post gets modded 'informative'.
If the question is off topic, then so is the answer, IMO.
Indeed, some Church of England vicars do not believe in God - amazingly enough.
Oh, how constructive. Just because someone doesn't understand how a comment relates to the discussino in hand doesn't make them a troll.
If you're smarter than me, perhaps you would care to explain.
Well, this is just my experience, but the french toast I know is entirely savoury, for a start. I guess wikipedia has an article...
On the contrary, very few people outside China know what happened. Very few people know *why* it happened, inside China or outside, if any.
People inside China know more than you seem to think.
I wish people would stop using my name in such disgusting ways.
That's a Welsh pass time, and I'm English!
eh? you mean taking the argument off on a tangent? ...or failing to fully explain something? ...or both?
;) - I'm not American, of course )
(or, in my case, assuming above normal intelligence
ok...so that sounds reasonable.
However, what has that to do with this discussion?