Slashdot Mirror


User: NatasRevol

NatasRevol's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6,627
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6,627

  1. Re:They didn't succeed though on NSA Chief: Nation-State Made 'Conscious Effort' To Sway US Presidential Election (aol.com) · · Score: 1

    LOL.

    Same thing.

  2. Re:They didn't succeed though on NSA Chief: Nation-State Made 'Conscious Effort' To Sway US Presidential Election (aol.com) · · Score: 1, Troll

    Really?

    So Trump didn't settle with the DoJ over racial discrimination?

    And he hasn't said many, many racist things since?

    Oh, BTW, she did it too isn't a defense of him.

  3. Re:They didn't succeed though on NSA Chief: Nation-State Made 'Conscious Effort' To Sway US Presidential Election (aol.com) · · Score: 1

    Just curious, but what crime do you think she committed?

    And are you aware that unindicted felon is an oxymoron?

  4. Re:They didn't succeed though on NSA Chief: Nation-State Made 'Conscious Effort' To Sway US Presidential Election (aol.com) · · Score: 1

    she got 4 Americans killed, helped jail millions of minorities as "super predators", and helped ensure the rise of ISIS, so I suppose I can't say she's never done anything

    If she actually did that all by herself, she's a freaking miracle worker.

    If she didn't, then your point is utterly meaningless.

  5. Re:They didn't succeed though on NSA Chief: Nation-State Made 'Conscious Effort' To Sway US Presidential Election (aol.com) · · Score: 0

    Well, Trump is filling up the swamp with the status quo, just different leaning folks. At least Hillary knew how to fucking govern, and put people in place who also had experience. Or maybe you think putting someone in as Chief of Staff with zero governing experience is a good thing.

    Also, you voted for a racist, misogynistic fascist. You may not BE those things, but they didn't STOP you from voting for them.

  6. Re:They didn't succeed though on NSA Chief: Nation-State Made 'Conscious Effort' To Sway US Presidential Election (aol.com) · · Score: 0

    Gotta make up for the half a million Americans who weren't allowed to do their duty as citizens, thanks to the GOP.

  7. Re:They didn't succeed though on NSA Chief: Nation-State Made 'Conscious Effort' To Sway US Presidential Election (aol.com) · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Who gives a fuck if they are or are not racist.

    They voted for a racist, misogynistic fascist - something well known for decades. The voters may not BE those things, but those things don't GIVE THEM PAUSE for voting them into office.

  8. As if Hillary took advantage of them...

  9. Re: Poor Nazis on Twitter Suspends American Far-Right Activists' Accounts (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    Media is biased all over the place, but

    It is sad that Fox News, which I used to despise and thought of as right-wing propaganda, is now probably the most neutral of all the major media.

    is trolling at its best.

    Congrats, good AC!

  10. Re: What about the far-left? on Twitter Suspends American Far-Right Activists' Accounts (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    Have you heard what Trump wants to do? It sounds exactly like that.

    And if you're trying to say 'Hillary', guess what? She's not president-elect, so it's literally meaningless now what her policies are/were.

  11. Re: What about the far-left? on Twitter Suspends American Far-Right Activists' Accounts (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    yeah, because Obama wasn't criticized for his appointments. And Breitbart isn't neonazi.

    If you look up the word delusional, it's just a picture of your face.

    YOU LOST, YOU'RE ON THE LOSING TEAM. GET OVER IT!

    Sorry I won't get over America putting racist, sexist fascists into office. Unlike you & your confederate flag waving folk still upset over losing a war 150 years ago.

    Maybe I just like America, *all* of America, more than you.

  12. Re: What about the far-left? on Twitter Suspends American Far-Right Activists' Accounts (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, the old 'she did it too' defense.

    In spite of my agreement that she was a bad candidate, Trump is the one now on trial, for hiring actual neo Nazis, as he won the election. If he didn't want to play this game, he never should have entered. I'm betting he's very much regretting it now.

  13. Re: What about the far-left? on Twitter Suspends American Far-Right Activists' Accounts (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    No, I don't.

    I mean fascist - nationalist authoritarian government

    I mean racist - any distinction, exclusion, restriction, or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin that has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.

  14. Re:What about the far-left? on Twitter Suspends American Far-Right Activists' Accounts (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    Hey dumb fuck.

    Read the first amendment. All of it.

    Since you probably won't, I'll quote it here.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

  15. Re: Poor Nazis on Twitter Suspends American Far-Right Activists' Accounts (theguardian.com) · · Score: 0

    Just remember, there are way more cops who are killers AND associated with Nazis/KKK than there are cop killers.

    It seems to me that actual violence is being committed by Leftwing radicals.

    Probably because you only get your news from an inflammatory rightwing 'source'.

  16. Re:What about the far-left? on Twitter Suspends American Far-Right Activists' Accounts (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    That's how the laws are written.

    Are all the alt-reich ACs this fucking stupid?

  17. Re:What about the far-left? on Twitter Suspends American Far-Right Activists' Accounts (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    Let us know when US laws apply to the UK.

    Until then, shut up you fuckwad.

  18. Re:What about the far-left? on Twitter Suspends American Far-Right Activists' Accounts (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    Especially now that Pence is VP elect. And Guilini has said that waterboarding isn't torture.

    Because you can burn the gay out with war crimes, if you're a fucking psychopath.

  19. Re: What about the far-left? on Twitter Suspends American Far-Right Activists' Accounts (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    Now, it's part of the new White House policy.

    Maybe Bannon's Law should be realized: Anybody who voted for a racist, fascist organization has by definition supported (neo) Nazis.

  20. Re:What about the far-left? on Twitter Suspends American Far-Right Activists' Accounts (theguardian.com) · · Score: 0

    due to their disgusting fascist suppression and censorship

    You're cute when you're funny.

  21. Re: Poor Nazis on Twitter Suspends American Far-Right Activists' Accounts (theguardian.com) · · Score: 0

    Mostly because of words and actions that are remarkably similar to Nazis.

    For example: just about every article ever on Breitbart.

  22. Really? Food is the answer to everyone's livelihood?

  23. Only if China accepts our tariffs. And they seem very unwilling to do so.

  24. Re: All-out trade war on China Threatens To Cut Sales of iPhones and US Cars if 'Naive' Trump Pursues Trade War (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So, making it happen faster is the best option?

    Or the stupidest option?

  25. Re: All-out trade war on China Threatens To Cut Sales of iPhones and US Cars if 'Naive' Trump Pursues Trade War (theguardian.com) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Keep saying they're poor. While they destroy our economy.

    If China wants, they can replace the $X worth of goods we send them with local manufacturing. If we do the same, our prices double. Theirs won't. Guess who wins & who loses.

    It's that simple.