I have no doubt that the dataset referred to is that collected by the Japanese Agency alone, specifically on Japanese-governed lands and territories. If you want to prove me wrong, then have at it.
Here's your proof. Not that you'll believe it. It took all of 3 clicks from the first article to find it.
"JMA monitors the global climate with CLIMAT and SYNOP reports from NMHSs through the Global Telecommunication System (GTS) of WMO. Quality-checked data on temperature and precipitation are assembled to assess extreme climate events. Weekly, monthly and seasonal monitoring reports on extreme climate events with brief descriptions of disastrous events are available on this page, along with world distribution maps of temperature and precipitation. "
But the climate deniers are very squeaky wheels. Just like most things, their bullshit gets trumpeted as fact by some, thus holding up the discussions.
Slashdot Mirror
I have no doubt that the dataset referred to is that collected by the Japanese Agency alone, specifically on Japanese-governed lands and territories. If you want to prove me wrong, then have at it.
Here's your proof. Not that you'll believe it. It took all of 3 clicks from the first article to find it.
"JMA monitors the global climate with CLIMAT and SYNOP reports from NMHSs through the Global Telecommunication System (GTS) of WMO. Quality-checked data on temperature and precipitation are assembled to assess extreme climate events. Weekly, monthly and seasonal monitoring reports on extreme climate events with brief descriptions of disastrous events are available on this page, along with world distribution maps of temperature and precipitation. "
http://ds.data.jma.go.jp/tcc/t...
Additionally, they have a completely separate page for climate in Japan. Not that you'll believe that either.
You are a block head.
Just because their instruments and their people didn't collect the data does not mean it is not in their dataset.
If the UN did a world population count, could they use each country's census (if available) or not?
You seem to believe that they can't, and that each country's data would not be valid because the UN didn't count it themselves.
I was making a joke.
I have no idea what you're talking about.
Proto humans.
Sure, because they haven't collected data from other data sources, right?
Yep, just no humans. Or any of our current livestock.
Sounds great. No livestock, huge predators. Sign me up.
Miami Beach is now having to pay hundreds of millions to mitigate actual consequences of rising seas.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05...
I blame Jenny McCarthyism.
Fortunately or unfortunately, climate change will create local effects. And those living locally will have to deal with it by either paying or moving.
Miami Beach is already paying for it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05...
What the fuck are you on about. They were not talking about Japan's climate. They were talking about Japan's records for global data.
Also, NASA's global data said the same thing. Yes, they were collecting data for the globe, not for NASA.
Talk about bias.
You obviously didn't actually look at the articles.
The deltas are increasing. They have not actually been flat for a while, like since the 60s.
Is the last sentence of the first article good enough for you?
In April, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels reached a monthly average of 400 parts per million for the first time in at least 800,000 years.
The ladies have learned about silicone rubber for their fun.
They're not buying anything until it can print in soft plastic.
We care.
We just don't want to be Gitmo'd.
Like prostitution?
4chan does a pretty good job of that.
Well, there's still transmission fluids, brake fluids, steering fluids, coolant fluids.
Wouldn't they need some sort of physical evidence already?
If not, no warrant. At least in theory.
illegal/anonymous/no difference
They're in the back, you moron.
I'd say the 4th and 5th amendments would say they could not search your memory. At least in the US. And if you're not a Muslim.
Well, it is a monarchy there...
So, you're saying we should eat more of them?
Iraq.
I think that's what most people are trying to do.
But the climate deniers are very squeaky wheels. Just like most things, their bullshit gets trumpeted as fact by some, thus holding up the discussions.