Not really. That's not how greenhouse gasses work. They trap incoming heat by preventing it from re-radiating. The net heat input from fossil fuel use over the entire planet is down in the noise level compared to incoming solar energy.
This is why the no-science public needs to chill out, STFU and quit getting whipped into a frenzy by people trying to leverage AGW for political gains. We understand the basic principles, but are still far away from useful predictive models that could be used to evaluate the impact of changes in energy policies.
To my knowledge they still kept the mac/ip white listing
Correct. But the most likely attack would be to inject malicious code into the passenger entertainment system and run it there. Since that equipment is already whitelisted, the bus switch would forward it to it's destination address. The data doesn't originate from 'outside' the network.
Boeing is the one who installed the network and Boeing is the one who asked the FAA for the exception to existing rules for systems separation.
They provide customers and IFE vendors with specifications for equipment compatible with the data bus (and any other aircraft systems like power). If that data bus was isolated from the avionics buses, then Boeing could just say there was no safety problem. But that's not the case on the 787 (and perhaps older model derivatives adopting it's data bus architecture).
Boeing is responsible for certification of all aircraft systems. In fact, Boeing doesn't supply anything. It's all built by other vendors. But that's not an excuse for poor systems architecture.
IOActive said that segmentation between aircraft control and information services that oversee avionics and operational control of a plane should isolate these vulnerabilities to passenger entertainment domains.
That may have been true on older models, but Boeing got an exception to the separation rule for the 787. What's worse, the primary authentication method used to provide 'security' is a protocol that filters packets based on MAC addresses. So you can't plug your own gizmo into an avionics bus. But if you can trick the passenger entertainment units into generating bogus air data (for example), bad stuff can happen.
"If we could have manufacturers install filters that would be shipped to South Carolina, then anything that children have access on for pornography would be blocked," Chumley reportedly said. "We felt like that would be another way to fight human trafficking."
Because what? Children who watch porn engage in human trafficking? I really think that legislators in South Carolina don't have the first clue as to how trafficking works.
Just wait until someone with a security clearance is contacted by an alleged outside contractor doing an "investigation". The f[censored]ing FBI can't even keep people from running around with fake badges, claiming to be agents.
<pedantic mode=on>Actually, it's tax avoidance that is legal. Not evasion.</pedantic>
The EU desperately needs more cash
Which is funny because they claim that Ireland should be collecting this tax. None will be going to the EU. If the Irish want, they could take it and grant a one time payout to every Irish citizen. And then they'd be right back where they are today.
But this goes to the root of the EU's case. They claim Ireland gave Apple a special break. Ireland says that this break is available to any company based in Ireland. No special treatment, no violation of it's EU treaty. No back taxes owed.
Slashdot Mirror
Its been done.
Steganography. You can't examine every cat video.
and we keep adding heat
Not really. That's not how greenhouse gasses work. They trap incoming heat by preventing it from re-radiating. The net heat input from fossil fuel use over the entire planet is down in the noise level compared to incoming solar energy.
This is why the no-science public needs to chill out, STFU and quit getting whipped into a frenzy by people trying to leverage AGW for political gains. We understand the basic principles, but are still far away from useful predictive models that could be used to evaluate the impact of changes in energy policies.
fucking science class
That would be Psych 210 at the University of Washington.
That was probably a joke,
Yes.
This allowed Nokia Corporation to solely focus on communications.
The way that business is going, they should have stuck with tires (that's the implied punch line).
What do you mean, 'slow'?
To my knowledge they still kept the mac/ip white listing
Correct. But the most likely attack would be to inject malicious code into the passenger entertainment system and run it there. Since that equipment is already whitelisted, the bus switch would forward it to it's destination address. The data doesn't originate from 'outside' the network.
Usually the FAA is very conservative on aircraft design.
Regulatory capture
What possible justification
Cheap. We saved a whole twisted pair of wires. Woo hoo!
Boeing is the one who installed the network and Boeing is the one who asked the FAA for the exception to existing rules for systems separation.
They provide customers and IFE vendors with specifications for equipment compatible with the data bus (and any other aircraft systems like power). If that data bus was isolated from the avionics buses, then Boeing could just say there was no safety problem. But that's not the case on the 787 (and perhaps older model derivatives adopting it's data bus architecture).
Boeing does not supply the IFE system
Boeing is responsible for certification of all aircraft systems. In fact, Boeing doesn't supply anything. It's all built by other vendors. But that's not an excuse for poor systems architecture.
IOActive said that segmentation between aircraft control and information services that oversee avionics and operational control of a plane should isolate these vulnerabilities to passenger entertainment domains.
That may have been true on older models, but Boeing got an exception to the separation rule for the 787. What's worse, the primary authentication method used to provide 'security' is a protocol that filters packets based on MAC addresses. So you can't plug your own gizmo into an avionics bus. But if you can trick the passenger entertainment units into generating bogus air data (for example), bad stuff can happen.
Can't do that. Bicycles are our most effective form of traffic calming devices. In other words; human speed bumps.
All Uber has to do is to pay the state for autonomous car permits. Then everything will be fine.
using the truncheon of government as a retaliation against those that don't comply
Let's hear it for those 'small government' conservatives.
And has nothing to do with kids. The most popular porn category is MILFs.
(Damned spell checker tried to replace 'most' with 'moist'.)
That's not going to work. Adobe just brought the Linux version of Flash up to the current Windows/Mac versions. So we're in line with the current porn distribution standards.
"If we could have manufacturers install filters that would be shipped to South Carolina, then anything that children have access on for pornography would be blocked," Chumley reportedly said. "We felt like that would be another way to fight human trafficking."
Because what? Children who watch porn engage in human trafficking? I really think that legislators in South Carolina don't have the first clue as to how trafficking works.
They weren't complying with the law.
Yes, they were. Irish law. The issue of Irish law not complying with EU treaty is a matter between Ireland and Brussels.
Just wait until someone with a security clearance is contacted by an alleged outside contractor doing an "investigation". The f[censored]ing FBI can't even keep people from running around with fake badges, claiming to be agents.
Windows 10: Do not want
tax evasion is not illegal
<pedantic mode=on>Actually, it's tax avoidance that is legal. Not evasion.</pedantic>
The EU desperately needs more cash
Which is funny because they claim that Ireland should be collecting this tax. None will be going to the EU. If the Irish want, they could take it and grant a one time payout to every Irish citizen. And then they'd be right back where they are today.
on the premise that everyone else is doing it
But this goes to the root of the EU's case. They claim Ireland gave Apple a special break. Ireland says that this break is available to any company based in Ireland. No special treatment, no violation of it's EU treaty. No back taxes owed.