imagine what some terrorists with flying cars could do?
So what is the essential difference between that and, oh, I don't know, say, a plane?
Anyone who wants to take a small light aircraft up (and has one/rents one and has a licence) can pretty much go for it.
Flying cars aren't going to raise your danger from terrorists (which is incredibly small anyway). Crap drivers crashing into your house - now that's a different matter.
The DoD did put their name on it. Maybe I'm just weird, but opening odd boxes labelled as gov't property outside of a known military base just doesn't strike me as a very wise thing to do.
Yes, so if you don't like the government putting surveillance devices on public land, the right thing to do is to dig them up, and hand them in at your friendly US government office, since they are clearly lost/abandoned.
Like the DVLA, for example. "I found these, they're yours. You should take more care of them."
Slashdot Mirror
So what is the essential difference between that and, oh, I don't know, say, a plane?
Anyone who wants to take a small light aircraft up (and has one/rents one and has a licence) can pretty much go for it.
Flying cars aren't going to raise your danger from terrorists (which is incredibly small anyway). Crap drivers crashing into your house - now that's a different matter.
Yes, so if you don't like the government putting surveillance devices on public land, the right thing to do is to dig them up, and hand them in at your friendly US government office, since they are clearly lost/abandoned.
Like the DVLA, for example. "I found these, they're yours. You should take more care of them."
Or even the EPA. "You shouldn't litter so much."