when every Israeli Prime Minister says the goal is to have Israel be a jewish only state, that's ok.
Of course it's okay! Why shouldn't it be okay? Israel is their land, and they can do with it as they please. They're surrounded by people who want to eradicate them, who will even blow themselves up just to kill a few of the hated Jews, so why should they be forced to include Arabs or Palestinians in their country? Granted, Gaza is arguably Palestinian, so I think Israel should just let it go and become its own country, and keep the troublesome Palestinians out of Israel for good. Jews only. What's wrong with that? I'm not a Jew, and I don't see anything wrong with them having their own land...
Seriously, there is nothing wrong with ethnic cleansing if you aren't killing people. It can be necessary to preserve a culture from foreign hordes. The Palestinians, despite (or because of) poverty, still manage to outreproduce the Israelis. If they let them into Israel proper, soon they'll be the majority race there - just like with the Chinese immigrants in Canada, or the Muslim immigrants in France. They're a human tidal wave of people crashing over those who rightfully belong there. Trying to stop it is not wrong.
This is accurate and appropriate:
I'm German, so I feel qualified to answer this comment. Given the choice between an Israeli webmailer and Google, I'd choose Google.
Without taking into account features, performance, etc. etc. he picks Google based on the fact that the other one is from Israel. This is accurate?
Do you not understand the meaning of the word accurate? He said that he feels qualified to answer this comment, and he most probably does. He also said that he would choose Google over an Israeli company, and that too is probably true. Therefore, his statement is accurate. You should look it up in a dictionary.
It's appropriate, too, because he wanted to say why a German might not want to go with an Israeli service for reasons other than Nazism. So there you have it. Accurate, and appropriate.
Would a company that makes hard drive partitioning software be responsible if some employee pirated their software and destroyed the partitions on an important hard drive? Would a company that makes telnet server software (simple, I know) be responsible if that same employee pirated it, ran it on a computer, and someone potentially had access to their network?
Of course not. The employee's responsible. And you're an idiot.
Slashdot Mirror
Of course it's okay! Why shouldn't it be okay? Israel is their land, and they can do with it as they please. They're surrounded by people who want to eradicate them, who will even blow themselves up just to kill a few of the hated Jews, so why should they be forced to include Arabs or Palestinians in their country? Granted, Gaza is arguably Palestinian, so I think Israel should just let it go and become its own country, and keep the troublesome Palestinians out of Israel for good. Jews only. What's wrong with that? I'm not a Jew, and I don't see anything wrong with them having their own land...
Seriously, there is nothing wrong with ethnic cleansing if you aren't killing people. It can be necessary to preserve a culture from foreign hordes. The Palestinians, despite (or because of) poverty, still manage to outreproduce the Israelis. If they let them into Israel proper, soon they'll be the majority race there - just like with the Chinese immigrants in Canada, or the Muslim immigrants in France. They're a human tidal wave of people crashing over those who rightfully belong there. Trying to stop it is not wrong.
Do you not understand the meaning of the word accurate? He said that he feels qualified to answer this comment, and he most probably does. He also said that he would choose Google over an Israeli company, and that too is probably true. Therefore, his statement is accurate. You should look it up in a dictionary.
It's appropriate, too, because he wanted to say why a German might not want to go with an Israeli service for reasons other than Nazism. So there you have it. Accurate, and appropriate.
Would a company that makes hard drive partitioning software be responsible if some employee pirated their software and destroyed the partitions on an important hard drive? Would a company that makes telnet server software (simple, I know) be responsible if that same employee pirated it, ran it on a computer, and someone potentially had access to their network?
Of course not. The employee's responsible. And you're an idiot.