Slashdot Mirror


World's First 1GB Web Mail May Not Be From Google

xPertCodert writes "According to this article, the world's first 1GB web mail is not going to be Google, but from the largest Israeli web portal. With 30Mb per attachment, it seems to be quite useful as well. Looks like an idea of extra-large e-mail storage is becoming really hot these days."

537 comments

  1. Is this a joke submission? by Liselle · · Score: 5, Informative

    First 1GB email service? First of all, what is Spymac, chopped liver? They already have a free email service with 1GB of storage.

    I'm going to issue a press release... I will be the first person to send data over phone lines. Maybe it will be hardware you install in your computer! Buy my stock!

    --
    Auto-reply to ACs: "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."
    1. Re:Is this a joke submission? by nuba · · Score: 0

      but googel is teh bester!

    2. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, I sent a note to the editor about that before the posting went live, but no correction on it as yet. *shrug* Welcome to Slashdot.

    3. Re:Is this a joke submission? by platypibri · · Score: 1

      I'm just replying to see this thread get attention, "World's Fist 1GB email" is a title handed out a while ago. "Spymac's free membership includes: 1 GB e-mail account, 350 MB combined storage, personal blog, forum, gallery, auctions and more"

      --
      Yeah, I guess I'm funny like that.
    4. Re:Is this a joke submission? by sp67 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You don't get it, the story is about services that are about to be launched; Spymac is already in business, so it doesn't qualify... sheesh, was it that hard?

      --
      Tuff that Smatters.
    5. Re:Is this a joke submission? by bfg9000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Can any of you guys get your Spymac mail accounts to work? I can't -- I've been assuming it's been announced, but not functional yet.

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    6. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Liselle · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yeah, I've lost count of how many times I've sent in corrections that I saw when it was in "Mysterious Future" mode. I give up. Why even bother with the link at all, if they don't check/care about the emails the subscribers send?
      Welcome to Slashdot.
      Seriously. :P
      --
      Auto-reply to ACs: "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."
    7. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      been at spymac for 2 weeks still havent got my mail to work. perhaps a better definition would be the first working 1 gb e-mail

    8. Re:Is this a joke submission? by dmallinson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The story states that it is the world's first 1Gb email service. Spymac already offers this.

      How does spymac not qualify because it is already in business? The topic is actually questioning that Google won't be the first, so the Spymac posting is relevant.

      --
      www.pdaforum.net
    9. Re:Is this a joke submission? by GetPFunky · · Score: 0

      No doubt, SpyMac didn't expect the flood of leechers trying to sign up for 40 accounts a day. But it is working and they are working through the issues. Yes, it took 5 days for my activation email to get sent, and a few additional days to get Web Manager working, but all is good now.

    10. Re:Is this a joke submission? by bfg9000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, I was just there - sort of. They're in the process of being Slashdotted...

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    11. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Goo.cc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Spymac is already in business"

      So was Google.

    12. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. and don't forget, "I invented the Internet."

    13. Re:Is this a joke submission? by McAddress · · Score: 2, Interesting
      1 GB e-mail account, 350 MB combined storage

      seems strange that they have a 1 GB email account, yet only give you 350 MB of storage.

    14. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditch your Slashdot subscription and join TotalFark. It's actually worth it, since there is tons of content, not just oh-look-i-have-a-gold-star.

    15. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spymac does work.. their server is a tad slow, maybe coz of the demand or the fact that they are still new.. but ya, I am already using it. And it has a real snazzy Mac e-mail interface

    16. Re:Is this a joke submission? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      "First 1GB email service? First of all, what is Spymac, chopped liver?"

      As a purveyor of fine minced liver products, I take great offense to your comparison! =)

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    17. Re:Is this a joke submission? by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 1

      "I will be the first person to send data over phone lines." By the fact that I read your comment, I assume I'm the first person to recieve data over a telephone line. This is especially weird since it appears no one has managed to send any data yet.

    18. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fark bores me. I have a 3-digit UID there, I was an early adopter back then Drew did it as a hobby for his friends. Now that it's popular, the submissions are even more asinine than they are here, which is a neat trick.

    19. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Beaker74 · · Score: 1

      My account's been working for a week.. I have a feeling they haven't been able to keep up with the demand. It was working as of this morning, but now... I'm sure it's going to be toast for a bit.

    20. Re:Is this a joke submission? by netmask · · Score: 1

      and even this new company is doing a beta period.. so they can't say they were the first production one either.

      What about the dozens of websites that are running on single processor linux boxes that offer a gig of webmail. Just because they don't do press releases and marketing.. doesn't mean they didn't do it first.

    21. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      It's really _not_ worth it, plus the focus of Slashdot is way different than that of Fark. Plus there are some really weird people behind the scenes at Fark that will ban you for practically nothing. I let my TotalFark sub lapse.

    22. Re:Is this a joke submission? by kon_ig · · Score: 1

      Mine is working fine. I had to wait for about a week after signing up before it started working. The server is slow, but it works and you also have free POP3 and SMTP.

      There are number of problems, such as:

      WebDav still does not work for me;

      Incoming SMTP is a bit too picky (insists on RDNS)

      Rich-text Web Mail composer only sends out HTML, not Text + HTML.

      etc.

    23. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spymac is a joke...only POP3 right now. Basically 1GB account is useful if you don't check your email for 3 years or so.

    24. Re:Is this a joke submission? by zgornz · · Score: 1

      So not only did /. get the "First" part wrong, check out the max size of attachments. 30Mb? (b?!?) It's 30MB. 30Mb would only be 3.75MB (30Mb*1B/8b), which is not very impressive at all. The press release has it right, 30MB.

    25. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Miriku+chan · · Score: 1

      is spymac isnt just an email service tho is it?

      --
      shaolin punk, activist post-industrial
    26. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      Yeah,

      But is Spymac (great name) hosted by MOSSAD?

      Bezeq takes options in Walla internet portal
      State-controlled Bezeq Israel Telecom said it would take options to acquire up to 50 per cent of Walla Communications Ltd, an Israeli internet portal. The first option, valid for three months, would grant Bezeq the right to buy 26 per cent of Walla for around US$5 million. The second option, valid for a year, would enable Bezeq to increase its stake to 50 per cent at a premium of 10 per cent to the price of the first option. The deal is subject to the approval of Israel's privatisation committee and the anti-trust authority. Bloomberg said separately, Bezeq also announced it had signed an agreement to invest $1.6 million for 26 per cent of Infogate On-Line Ltd.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    27. Re:Is this a joke submission? by scottj · · Score: 1

      I got in last week (or was it the week before). It took about a day for everything to get setup properly after I signed up, but after that it just worked (slowly). They don't have much bandwidth (or processor cycles for that matter), but the service does work (eventually).

      --
      .-.--
    28. Re:Is this a joke submission? by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I've reported dupes and mistakes to the "on duty editor". He seems pretty off-duty if you ask me...

      --
      Martin
    29. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that you get 1 GB of space available just for email, and 350 mb of that you can use for the other services mentioned

    30. Re:Is this a joke submission? by dr.badass · · Score: 4, Informative

      First of all, what is Spymac, chopped liver?

      Yes, actually. Spymac is pretty awful in my experience. The mail service is no exception.

      First, they ask you for about six pages of information vs. Gmail's two fields. Next, their 'activation' mailing takes two weeks Then you find out that you have a 10MB attachment limit on your 1GB mail account. Then you find out that the advertized POP3 access doesn't, you know...work. (It doesn't at this very moment on my account.)

      The end result is a pretty run-of-the-mill webmail service. It made me realize that the promising thing about Gmail isn't the 1GB, it's the features.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    31. Re:Is this a joke submission? by dr.badass · · Score: 2, Interesting

      seems strange that they have a 1 GB email account, yet only give you 350 MB of storage.

      Even stranger is that 250 of that is for pictures in the Spymac gallery, which means you can only store 100MB of Real Actual Files.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    32. Re:Is this a joke submission? by naiv · · Score: 1

      thank you! i've been wanting someone to point that out for ages. spymac hasnt gotten any recognition. i think they should have a main page /. apology for it

    33. Re:Is this a joke submission? by dr.badass · · Score: 3, Informative

      The unofficial official word (that is, comments by Spymac employees in the forums) has been :

      -New accounts take 2 weeks to activate.
      -We were "Shocked, shocked!" at all the new users since
      we announced the 1GB email service.
      -WebDAV doesn't work.
      -POP3 doesn't work.
      -FTP works this week, maybe.
      -"Don't you want to buy hosting services from us?"

      Of course, none of this is on the main page, in the
      support pages, or mentioned during the too-long signup
      process. I've never felt so ripped-off by a free service.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    34. Re:Is this a joke submission? by codejester · · Score: 1

      No but SpyMac might be. It seems they are trying real hard but just can not handle the flood of users they have been getting since gmail was announced.

      I have an account there but I've only been able to get into the webmail interface a few times. The rest of the time it is down. I should note no email seems to be lost, its just an access issue at this point...

      I've tried spymac and am still waiting for gmail before I redirect any addresses I care about...

    35. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Trejkaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pfft. You think the Slashdot editors actually do any work? Check this out:

      2004-02-09 23:31:38 IETF Accepts XMPP-IM as Proposed Standard (articles,internet) (pending)

      Yes, that is February and yes, the article is still pending.

      I'm surprised any stories from right now are even getting processed right now considering they appear to be two months behind on the news.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    36. Re:Is this a joke submission? by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      So, are there really advantages to being a subscriber?

    37. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the pop3 works fine from my phone...

    38. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Informative? Not in an on-topic kind of way. The story is about - wait, why don't you read it yourself. Just the first sentence. Hell, even you admit that that sentence is not right, and that the grand-parent is in fact right about criticising the story - your opinions about Spymac non withstanding.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    39. Re:Is this a joke submission? by dacaldar · · Score: 1

      I think the point was that Google isn't offering the GMail yet. (I still think it's an April Fool's joke).

      --
      Response to previous sig:
      "Nice Beaver"

      Thanks. I just had it stuffed.

      (Couldn't resist - used to love that movie)

    40. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative? Not in an on-topic kind of way.

      Well, maybe when you get mod points you can moderate how you like.

    41. Re:Is this a joke submission? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      I didn't get mod points for about two years now. But thanks for the tip.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  2. Too late by ewithrow · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Spymac already has a free 1 GB web email service.

    Click here

    1. Re:Too late by ewithrow · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Strange how the post 3 minutes after mine pointing out spymac gets +4 but I get modded down to -1.

    2. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't like the cut of your jibb?

    3. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Slashdot.

  3. I wonder if they filter out... by SCSi · · Score: 5, Funny

    attachments that end in .rar or .r[0-9][0-9] :) I swear, I was only "checking my email".

    1. Re:I wonder if they filter out... by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An web e-mail service is not a very useful file sharing platform. Just like any time somebody posts a New York Times username/password on Slashdot, not soon after somebody logs onto said account and resets the password an e-mail address which steals the account and changes the locks on it.

    2. Re:I wonder if they filter out... by SCSi · · Score: 1

      True, but if all of your couriers have email accounts at the same email service, mass distributing a gig of "stuff" to a few dozen people would take no time at all.. Not that I would know about any of that stuff.. :)

    3. Re:I wonder if they filter out... by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well it would be trivial to make a script that could be initiated from anywhere to log on and send a set of files stored in the mailbox to somebody(like a per request emailer - you /msg evilbot !mail me_some_pron_at balblba@bigmailbox_i_just_got_for_free_so_i_dont_e ven_care_about_spam.com and the evilbot initiates a script that sends you some pron from a mailbox thats on some big free mailbox service). the mailbox being web accessible doesn't really matter, what matters is that you can store some stuff there and send it around without using your own bandwith.

      It's kind of problematic to police a system like this, the privacy laws being what they are in most civilised countries - I'd imagine them to build some bandwith protection/limitation to them though.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:I wonder if they filter out... by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      What about chain letters in those servers instead of p2p networks for distributing files? You send something to one of this systems users, that forward the messages to other users of this servers, at almost zero cost of bandwidth for both sides (at least the part of sharing, in some moment that should be downloaded or the mailbox emptied).

    5. Re:I wonder if they filter out... by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      Until all those dozen of endusers connects to download that gig of stuff..

      It doesn't matter if its same server or another server, the net effect is their bandwidth can be abused.

      I'm assuming they'll put bandwidth limits like most free webservers do. Which is why when people tried to use those free webbriefcases for piracy it failed miserably.

    6. Re:I wonder if they filter out... by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      It may not be useful for anonymous distribution systems, but for groups of people known to each other it would be quite handy indeed.

      When you use your hotmail account to send email to another hotmail user, you're getting near instantaneous transfers. So what's to stop someone from forwarding the latest CD or movie screener to his friends.

      Once it's in your account, you only need to send it to the target, then delete it from your account. They can then retrieve it from their own at their leisure.

      As friend/group oriented message systems grow in popularity piracy trends will follow and adapt.

    7. Re:I wonder if they filter out... by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Geez, I hope you're not the customer service rep. :)

      He was making a joke. We all know people will abuse it. He pointed that out, with humor. Maybe he's one of the abusers, maybe he's just playing devil's advocate, or maybe he wants some +funny karma.

      If your work is making you stressed enough to respond like that to a silly comment, find another line of work and let off some steam.

    8. Re:I wonder if they filter out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:I wonder if they filter out... by Phekko · · Score: 1

      "No, honestly, it's just a very, very long email encrypted with the, umm, new rar-encrypter that just coincidentally opens into executables with this other program that also happens to be called rar"

      Then again, O.J. Simpson was declared innocent and Georgey-boy is still president after not really having a justification to attack Iraq so stranger things have happened.

      To get back to the topic of big email for free, though, I guess you can calculate it like this:
      Most people won't use even close to the max quota allowed. (Assesment based on scientific Stetson-Harrison method. Or possibly not even that)

      Let's assume 100M of quota used per user. This would mean your average 100 Gig SCSI-disk is enough for about 1000 users. Let's assume some sort of waste due to RAID so it'll be like 700 users per disk. Let's further assume about a $500 price tag per disk.That'd mean a final price of under $1 per user (plus of course bandwidth, which I guess would raise it to about $1 per user, using the same aforementioned Stetson-Harrison method)

      Now, I have no idea how to calculate ad prices and Google was not a big help (or then I was lazy again) but I would assume that the auctions in Spymac bring in some revenue and the bigger your user base, the bigger your revenue (very surprising, eh?) To me it doesn't sound unreasonable to assume that your average user creates $1 worth of profit in a year's time. Then again, the Stetson-Harrison method is not quite scientific enough for me to start a business based on this model but what else is new?

      --

      Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
    10. Re:I wonder if they filter out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      An web e-mail service is not a very useful file sharing platform. Just like any time somebody posts a New York Times username/password on Slashdot, not soon after somebody logs onto said account and resets the password an e-mail address which steals the account and changes the locks on it.

      Surprising fact: data can be transferred from one email account to another.

    11. Re:I wonder if they filter out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine the possibilities...Movies by email. Netflix with no moving parts. On the other hand, I hate to think how the spammers will use this...

    12. Re:I wonder if they filter out... by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 1

      Obviously you never used AOL in the old days.

  4. Spymac.com by artios · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Spymac.com already offers 1GB e-mail. Albeit, their website is bloated and slow, and they offered it as a response to google -- but they should probably get "first" place.

  5. The worst part of Slashdot... by gid13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is hearing about these things before they're actually available. Note to Google and Walla!: FINISH THE DAMN BETA ALREADY!!!!!!!

    1. Re:The worst part of Slashdot... by jrrl · · Score: 1

      Not available? My gmail account seems to be working just fine.

      -John.

      --
      Self Serving Sig: Hosting Comparison
    2. Re:The worst part of Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're waiting for 3d realms to make their annoucement first...

  6. Spymac.com also offers 1GB account by ViNsAniTy · · Score: 1

    ...not sure if it's just open to Mac users though... http://www.spymac.com/

    1. Re:Spymac.com also offers 1GB account by Apiakun · · Score: 1

      No, anyone can use spymac. There are no restrictions on your OS, after all it is web-based.

      I've found it a bit slow, and have had some issues with mail not appearing or not being delivered, but they are still working out some of the kinks. It's a great service for being free. They aren't using targetted advertising, just your typical banner ads.

    2. Re:Spymac.com also offers 1GB account by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Spymac registeration asks for the number of Macs and other computers you have, and your primary OS, but it's all optional and doesn't affect anything.

      In fact, the odd thing is that I could get GNUMail.app (on Linux) to work beautifully with Spymac's SMTP/POP server, but I couldn't get my sister's Mail.app (on MacOSX) to work yet, but I suppose it's only temporary =)

    3. Re:Spymac.com also offers 1GB account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slow only because there are well over 200,000 members.

    4. Re:Spymac.com also offers 1GB account by langeland · · Score: 1

      I have an account on spymac but it hasn't been stable since i signed in. Half the times if tried to log in I was met by some server error.

      It's fine to provide 1G of space, but if users can't access their mail on demand, it's not an option.

      They tried to be first movers, but they couldn't handle it - therefore they die.

  7. More space to store SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, I don't have to worry about disk space if I go out of town for a week and don't read my E-mail. All that spam will no longer fill my 100M E-mail in basket. Of course, it will take a while for Mozilla to sort it all out and move it to my junk folder :)

  8. Google can do it, but can Walla? by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This definitely seems like an attempt to steal Google's thunder, but you have to ask if an Israel-local portal company really has the global reach that Google has to be able to offer high-performance ad-supported e-mail to everybody.

    I'm not quite sure that they're going to have enough non-local ads in order to serve the world in the way that Google now seems pretty confident in its global geotargeting systems.

    1. Re:Google can do it, but can Walla? by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Warning: a comment in very bad taste below:

      Personally, I have a hard time storing my email in a country where the building can be blown up any time. by a suicide bomber Come to think of it, USA probably isn't a good place either...

      I couldn't resist. Terrible huh...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Google can do it, but can Walla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing you still post at +1

    3. Re:Google can do it, but can Walla? by *Pres* · · Score: 1

      The way the Israeli government is acting these days, they're likely to get one hell of a lot of thunder real soon now, and it won't be from Google. ;-)

    4. Re:Google can do it, but can Walla? by alb0 · · Score: 1

      I've just signed up with walla to give it a try. Had to look at the html source to guess the meaning of the fields in the form, because it's Hebrew only. It was quite funny, but I doubt I will use it for real email.

      So to my point: maybe they won't have many non-local ads, but they also won't have as many non-local users as Google.

    5. Re:Google can do it, but can Walla? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Essentially Google have opened the floodgates. The limits on Hotmail and Yahoo were pretty miserly considering the plummeting costs of storage. You can get USB memory keys with more space that email accounts you have to pay for. Now that Google are giving away a gig, others will have to follow. Maybe you'll pay, maybe you won't, but at least you'll be paying for a reasonable amount of space for this hour and age. P.S. just because they're not google doesn't mean they're not watching you.....

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    6. Re:Google can do it, but can Walla? by luisdom · · Score: 1

      Er... have you seen the company's site? I don't think they'll have to worry about a sudden raise of international subscriptions...
      About the only thing I understood was "Copyright © 2003 Walla! Communications LTD. All rights reserved".

    7. Re:Google can do it, but can Walla? by lorcha · · Score: 1

      Hahahahah. You're so funny. But if anyone is going to get some thunder these days, what about the US? If the way to get "one hell of a lot of thunder" is to piss off enough muslims, do you think that Israel, who has pissed off two million muslims, or the US, who has pissed off 25 million Iraqis plus countless Saudis and Iranians, is going to get thunder?

      --
      "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  9. Email courtesy?? by daveodukeo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sometimes, i check my mail via pop3 on a dial-up connection. If I start getting 30 MB attatchments, I'll be in trouble.

    What happened to e-mail ettiquete??

    1. Re:Email courtesy?? by PurdueGraphicsMan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What happened to e-mail ettiquete??

      Email ettiquete gave way to productivity. If I need to get a file to someone quickly I'll usually email it (as long as I know that they have a broadband connection or are willing to wait for the attachment to download). Seems like it is all relative. I wouldn't send a 30Mb attachment to my friend on AOL, but to a friend that has cable/dsl they wouldn't mind it one little bit.

      --


      The guitars sound good, now give me about 10db more on the cow bell.
    2. Re:Email courtesy?? by Walterk · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of the POP3 TOP command?

    3. Re:Email courtesy?? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you're using dialup pop, then you should be retrieving only headers, and your email client should download individual messages for you instead of grabbing all of them up front. This will let you eliminate obvious spams (based on header contents.) The more thoughtful email clients put notes on attachments in the header...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Email courtesy?? by daveodukeo · · Score: 1

      It's not the people i know that i worry about... it's the random people who send wav audio files to listservs that give me a headache. Some days, i wish i could actually shrink the size of my mailbox so those things would be bounced back to them

    5. Re:Email courtesy?? by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      If you're using dialup pop, then you should be retrieving only headers, and your email client should download individual messages for you instead of grabbing all of them up front. This will let you eliminate obvious spams (based on header contents.) The more thoughtful email clients put notes on attachments in the header...

      I don't know of a single pop client that does this by default, and don't know if pop can do this at all. Typically imap is used for things like this.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    6. Re:Email courtesy?? by Blimey85 · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't send a 30Mb attachment to my friend on AOL, but to a friend that has cable/dsl they wouldn't mind it one little bit.

      You do know that AOL has a broadband service right? That's what I got for my sister. She likes AOL and I already pay for a cable modem so while she is living with me for a while, she has high speed AOL for a bit cheaper than a regular dial up AOL account would cost her.

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    7. Re:Email courtesy?? by valkraider · · Score: 1

      If you're using dialup pop, then you should be retrieving only headers, and your email client should download individual messages for you instead of grabbing all of them up front. This will let you eliminate obvious spams (based on header contents.) The more thoughtful email clients put notes on attachments in the header...

      I don't know of a single pop client that does this by default, and don't know if pop can do this at all. Typically imap is used for things like this.


      JBMail supports POP and does just that...

    8. Re:Email courtesy?? by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      What happened to e-mail ettiquete??

      Well, hopefully at least one of the MX-servers on the mails route to your inbox enforces it and simply drops the big package.

      Large attachments are a very bad idea since MIME-encoding adds 33% overhead.
      Use other protocols to transfer large files!

  10. sure? by muggybug · · Score: 1, Informative

    What about Spymac?

    --
    --------- Who knows? It is a mystery.
  11. ah extra room by jacquesm · · Score: 5, Funny

    I really needed that for all that spam...
    (is that kosher food ?)

    1. Re:ah extra room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not. You'll need to keep 2 sets of accounts.

    2. Re:ah extra room by Blastercorps · · Score: 1

      nope, pork product

    3. Re:ah extra room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.spam.com/sp/sp_ort.htm

    4. Re:ah extra room by mishehu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There is a product in Israel that we had to eat in the army called "Luf", and it's basically the equivalent of spam made out of a cow... most notably... all the parts of a cow that you didn't know were kosher...

  12. spymac by morcheeba · · Score: 5, Informative

    Spymac already offers 1Gig Email for free. Gmail's conversations sound like the most useful feature of their service. beta review

    1. Re:spymac by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      GMail's definitely expected to be much more than the storage alone, but also the way they'll be able to sort and search e-mail as threads of information.

      They're out to raise the bar for the existing free mail providers, because it seems like everything from radio stations to comic books have their own free e-mail service these days...

    2. Re:spymac by N0decam · · Score: 1

      Exactly - the 1Gb isn't the selling point to me. For that matter, I've had my own webmail set up on my own box for a couple of years now, and I offered myself over 1Gb of storage.

      They're trying to do some interface things quite differently, and they used the old "OMG! FREE BEER - now that I have your attention" marketing method to get people to try it.

    3. Re:spymac by shawnce · · Score: 1

      Yeah thanks... now SpyMac is /.ed

    4. Re:spymac by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Google copied and adapted that feature from Apple's Mail.app, if I understand it correctly. ;)

    5. Re:spymac by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Spymac already offers 1Gig Email for free. ... via POP3 too! :-D

      And 100 MB web space as an extra bonus.

      What's the catch? :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  13. Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, world's first 1gbyte spam messages began circulating late yesterday afternoon.

  14. Attachments? by InvaderXimian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why a 30MB attachment limit? They could just say 50TB attachment limit and nothing would really be changed since most mail servers have a 5MB attachment limit, at most. Very few of them have a bigger limit.

    1. Re:Attachments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very few is not none. I run one that has *no* attachment limit. (Well, except for the server's HD size) Very useful for sending E-mail to clients in Asia (20+ scanned pdf files that I can't upload to a FTP site) .. recently ran into someone who insisted on trying to use yahoo.com - they ran into problems; it took me a week to get them everything.

      With Gmail.com I can just ask him if he can get an account there.

    2. Re:Attachments? by Tripster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So true, I run a couple of mail servers for ISPs and we have 3-5MB limits imposed on incoming file sizes. This is for a couple of reasons, firstly we shouldn't have to load up the virus scanner even more with huge files, as it stands the scanners will skip over files over a certain size, but I'm sure the virus writers are eventually going to note this and start sending multi-megabyte virus files.

      Next is the dialup issue, if any of you have ever done tech support for a dialup pool you will have run across the clueless user who gets some huge attachment that will take at least 30 minutes to download, but clueless user is so used to his mail checks taking 30 seconds or less he never lets it download and at that point his email becomes "stuck" he thinks because everything behind said attachment is never being downloaded, nor is the attachment being deleted as it should.

      Finally let's not forget here that email is one of the worst methods for moving files around, especially largish files, I mean the overhead required to encode the file in text format for sending means you practically double the original size of the attachment to send it. Throw in some bounces and you waste megabytes of bandwidth.

    3. Re:Attachments? by blitziod · · Score: 1

      for paid members aol has a very high attachment limit...I used to use it because I had to get very large files emailed to me.

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
    4. Re:Attachments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. We had ours at 20, then 15, now 8. It still won't help since their mailbox limits are 150 mb. Whine, scream, pout all you want. Email is not designed to be a method of storing data. That's what a Fileserver is for. People need to fucking realize this.

    5. Re:Attachments? by SamSim · · Score: 2, Funny
      scanners will skip over files over a certain size, but I'm sure the virus writers are eventually going to note this and start sending multi-megabyte virus files.

      I had an idea about this, about making the largest, most comprehensively powerful, dangerous and unstoppable virus ever, giving it an innocuous name and distributing it via Kazaa. Nobody would suspect a 600MB file to be a virus!

      Then I realised Windows had already been invented.

    6. Re:Attachments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the simplest methods of making a virus undetectable is just binding it to another file. No need to write a multi-megabyte virus. This method of binding is more successful than just adding empty bytes to the end of the virus and often times more successful than scrambling CPX headers and other typical methods.

  15. THERE IS NO WAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm using an email service hosted in Israel. Might as well paint a big red target on myself.

    1. Re:THERE IS NO WAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Might as well paint a big red target on myself.

      We won't try to stop you...

  16. Cute by Pahalial · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But..
    a) Unknown and unheard of company
    b) Physically quite a ways from most wired countries, as opposed to widespread google (Akamai?) servers
    c) Israeli only so far, vs. however many localizations (let alone simple translations) google/gmail has/will have.
    d) None of the advanced searching/sorting features that Gmail has been promising and actually do sound fairly nice.

    --
    Stuff.
    1. Re:Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      you forgot...

      e) run by jews

    2. Re:Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a company owned by Ha'aretz, the same guys mentioned here.
      Israel generally has a role in Silicon Valley, but I don't see this (still vapor) service internationalized anytime soon.

      And yes, IAI (I'm an Israeli.... :)

      Make Love Not War

    3. Re:Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont understand whats so great about gmails search feature? I mean, it's a keyword search. It shows you the mails that have the keyword you searched for. How is that special? grep does the same thing as well as most email clients

    4. Re:Cute by UrgleHoth · · Score: 1

      e) Walla is in Hebrew.

      Also, from the article link, the free service is for Wallas customers:
      Walla Communications (TASE: WALA) Israel's leading Internet portal with 75,000 customers, reported this morning plans to become the first company in the world to provide one-gigabyte (GB) e-mailboxes to its customers.

      So unless your a Walla customer and can read Hebrew, looks like your out.

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    5. Re:Cute by women · · Score: 1

      Israeli only so far, vs. however many localizations (let alone simple translations) google/gmail has/will have.

      You have to think that a company in Israel would have redundant servers outside of the country if they're launching such an ambitious service. Also, office buildings generally aren't a target to suicide bombers. Suicide bombers typically go after things like restaurants where they can kill a lot of innocent people crowded into one, publicly accessible place.

      --
      If you're a fan of women, add me to your friends list.
    6. Re:Cute by lorcha · · Score: 1
      a) Unknown and unheard of company
      By you. Just because you don't know something does that make it unknown? Or does that merely mean that you don't know it? Walla has been around for a while. I'm too lazy to look up how long they've been around, but I definitely remember seeing them in 1997.
      b) Physically quite a ways from most wired countries, as opposed to widespread google (Akamai?) servers
      What does that mean? Israel is much closer to Finland, South Korea, Singapore, and Japan than the US is. But who says Walla's only point of presence has to be Israel? Do you think this service is in some dude's closet in a Tel Aviv highrise?
      c) Israeli only so far, vs. however many localizations (let alone simple translations) google/gmail has/will have.
      I suppose an Israeli portal who sells advertising to Israeli companies really ought to be in English. I mean, really every country in the world should just speak English. Also, God knows niche companies always fail.
      d) None of the advanced searching/sorting features that Gmail has been promising and actually do sound fairly nice.
      And I suppose you signed up and verified this?

      Cute response, but just because a service in another country is better than anything in the country that Canadians wannabe doesn't mean you can just write it off as "cute". That's like saying Microsoft Internet Explorer is "cute" because it kicked Netscape's ass.

      --
      "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  17. How can web portals afford this? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1 GB is a lot of information, and it has to cost a decent chunk of money to allocate that much storage for every user, and to pay for bandwidth for 30MB attachments, and for the rack space and electricity. How are web portals like google making back the cost of 1GB email?

    1. Re:How can web portals afford this? by telstar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just like every other web portal. They'll give it away for awhile, then when people get hooked, they'll jack up the price.

    2. Re:How can web portals afford this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find this amusing... What if google already HAS the drive space to handle this? i mean they have to have quite a bit of storage space for all your web sites... and images and.. news.. and groups... and... and..

      wait.. so google can handle how many searches with its servers? oh, and i can see how they are going to pay for this can you? lets see they have how much just by crawling web sites.. now.. think what they can make with your email data!!! w00t

    3. Re:How can web portals afford this? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      Look, storage space costs money. Even if we assume that google has the space already, so it's a sunk cost, and they are essentially utiliznig hard drives that are sitting in the corner, lonely and without data, they still pay money for things like T3s and whatever they have. Now, maybe they have excess capacity on bandwidth too. But, either way, in the future, as the 'net grows and they expand, they will need to purchase new equiptment when they need the drives sitting in the corner gathering dust. So at some point, it will cost Google money. So, again, how will they pay for it?

    4. Re:How can web portals afford this? by Morgahastu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not only do they have to have 1GB of disk space for each user, but think of the backup system! If they're using RAID they could use up to several gigabytes per user!

    5. Re:How can web portals afford this? by szyzyg · · Score: 1

      Anyone Remember Myplay.com? Used to Offer 3gigs of storage for music uploads - get you music online then you can listen to it anywhere you ahve an internet connection.

      Sounds expensive, but since the record biz were so anal about licensing and wanted too much money it turned out to be cheaper to do it this way.

      my.mp3.com used less disk space but ended up paying a lot more than the money they saved in legal judgements against them....

      just an aside - myplay.com launched in 1999, 5 years on the cost of disk space has dropped a lot.

    6. Re:How can web portals afford this? by Araneas · · Score: 1

      With enough disk space Google could become Borge's The Library of Babel. Effectively, everything that could ever be written would be stored and referenced through a simple pointer. Binary would be UUencoded of course.

    7. Re:How can web portals afford this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Several racks of servers are a drop in the ocean to a $multi-billion company like google.

    8. Re:How can web portals afford this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll give it away for awhile, then when people get hooked, they'll jack up the price.

      <badmath>
      I hate that. Just the other day, I was using a free mail service that charged me $0. Then suddenly I received an email telling me that my fees would increase by 500%. Boy, was I pissed.
      </badmath>

    9. Re:How can web portals afford this? by hords · · Score: 1
      1 GB is a lot of information, and it has to cost a decent chunk of money to allocate that much storage for every user

      Who says that they have to allocate 1 GB for every user anyway.

      ISPs don't allocate 1 line for every user, and often advertise *no busy signals* and *unlimited usage*. They keep the modem to user ratio around 10:1, 7:1, etc. and bet that everyone won't try to use it at the same time.

      Same goes with email. I work at an ISP that has 10MB limits on mailbox size. We don't have enough space for everyone to have 10MB in their box, but always have spare space.

      Telephone companies don't have the capacity for everyone to make a phone call at once. Big problem when the Internet got big in our town. Dial a number, get a fast busy signal. Using redial it took nearly 100 tries to get through when it was at the worst.

      Often ISPs don't have enough bandwidth for everyone to use their broadband at once.

      The list goes on and on. It's really a numbers game.

    10. Re:How can web portals afford this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did y'all miss the 'Targeted Ads' part? It's all marketing, baby.

    11. Re:How can web portals afford this? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      Ok, I concede your point. But that means that Google needs x MB per user, possibly hundreds on average. Again, how are they paying for this? Services like Hotmail and Yahoo limit storage space because they can't afford for somebody to keep 300MB in emails on their servers.

    12. Re:How can web portals afford this? by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 1

      How are web portals like google making back the cost of 1GB email?

      By virtue of 90% of their users storing anywhere near that much data, I imagine.

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
    13. Re:How can web portals afford this? by brucmack · · Score: 1

      Well firstly, of course they are using RAID, and secondly, exactly which RAID mode is it that turns 1 GB into several GB?

    14. Re:How can web portals afford this? by naChoZ · · Score: 1
      Not a full answer, but one thing to consider is their volume discount. (no pun intended)

      I used to work at a very large ISP and I can attest that the discounts that vendors will give to get your business are very very substantial.

      --
      "I can be self-referential if I want to," said Tom, swiftly.
    15. Re:How can web portals afford this? by Morgahastu · · Score: 1

      RAID 1 atleast doubles the disk usage, depending on how redundant you make it.

      + backups. *Could* be several gigabytes per user.

  18. how about spymac (-1, redundant) by cheezus · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I don't know if anyone mentioned it yet ;), but I think spymac has 1gig email accounts.

    --
    /bin/fortune | slashdotsig.sh
  19. So what? by Seoulstriker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Everyone with a Gmail account, including myself, knows that email storage space is not the only part of an effective email system. The Gmail interface is so simplified, efficient, and intuitive, that there will probably not be anything coming out that can compete with it. (ask people who both have Gmail and Spymac and see what they think)

    Not only that, but the Israeli service requires money whereas Gmail is free. I am confident that Gmail will be the only truly successful free gigabyte email service.

    --
    I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
    1. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of interface... I've noticed that Gmail requires Javascript. Call me paranoid but I'm a little uncomfortable reading email through a browser with Javascript turned on. No matter how careful the provider is, there is always a chance that some malicious script or html will slip through and make my browser do unwanted things simply by viewing some email (or accidently clicking on a link). So I stick to free email providers like yahoo that work with basic html, and I only check my email with a browser where Javascript is off. This way I'm pretty sure I won't get any surprises.

      I am confident that Gmail will be the only truly successful free gigabyte email service.

      BTW be careful here, it sounds like you've made up your mind already. It's a Good Thing to keep an open mind and to always view today's champion with some criticism. Otherwise you risk getting caught off-guard.

    2. Re:So what? by glinden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exactly right. GMail asks and answers the question, "What e-mail client would you build if you never had to delete any of your old e-mail?"

      GMail is designed to organize your information for easy access later. Messages are threaded, part of a conversation on a topic. Searching your mail is emphasized. And, because it's web-based, you can access you mail and any information in your mail from any computer.

      The 1G of storage is just a means to the end.

    3. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Pine's search feature (expecially the ability to broaden & narrow searches) is so good that I have no problem with my multiple-GB emails.

      If I never had to delete emails, I'll hope GMail has an IMAP interface so I can take advantage of Pine.

    4. Re:So what? by greystormcloud · · Score: 1

      " I am confident that Gmail will be the only truly successful free gigabyte email service."

      And we will only ever need 640K of memory. :)

    5. Re:So what? by yosemite · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am confident that Gmail will be the only truly successful free gigabyte email service.

      Give it 20 years when the cost per gig is nothing. Then everyone will have 20 gig email accounts and google will own your soul and all of your "conversations" or what ever they'll call email in 2024.

    6. Re:So what? by surgeonsmate · · Score: 1

      Your cynicism about Google is ill-advised. I'd have to say that Google is the only truly successful Web search service, having seen off dozens of competitors. If they put their efforts into a useful email service, who's to say they won't be as successful?

    7. Re:So what? by alphakappa · · Score: 1

      and as a user of Gmail, I have to say that it Rocks! It finds simple solutions to stuff which seems so intuitive now that I use it.. makes one wonder why no one could think of it earlier.. I'm very very impressed!

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  20. I'm waiting for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Claria mail. I wan't to deal with a company I can trust. Like microsoft.

  21. new account by eblis · · Score: 1

    How do I sign up for an account with this email provider if I don't read Hebrew?

    --
    You want what with that?
    1. Re:new account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is that suppose to mean?

    2. Re:new account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      what is that suppose to mean?

      Ummmmm....their entire site is in Hebrew, brainiac.

    3. Re:new account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Learn Hebrew.
      2. sign up for an account http://www.walla.co.il/
      3. ????

  22. Hmm.... by shrykk · · Score: 1

    The best thing about 1GB email is that I'll never have to delete a message. Not that I'll search through them either.

    But the few precious seconds a day I spend highlighting mails, clicking 'delete' - all gone!

    And when my gigabyte is filled with crap I'll just get another account :)

    --
    #define struct union /* Reduce memory usage */
  23. Ok... by hookedup · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These services offering large attachment sizes, how useful can they really be when the majority of users cant recieve the files due to limits set on their mail server?

    Sending huge attachments is nice and everything, but it's only going to work if your friend has a gmail/spymac acount (or thier own mail server) too..

    1. Re:Ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sending huge attachments is nice and everything, but it's only going to work if your friend has a gmail/spymac acount (or thier own mail server) too..

      I think that you just answered your own question. Pretty smart move, eh? Imagine how many of these we're going to hear: "You didn't receive my attachment? 5MB limit? your mail server is lousy, get a gmail account!"

    2. Re:Ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a 30MB file that you want to move from PC A to PC B - what do you do? Email it to yourself from A and download the message on B. Yes, there are better ways to do this, but many many users use email for this type of transfer.

  24. could not see page, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then I discovered that access to that pages ran through the goldenlines isp which I had to block last week because one of their customers keept performing directory attacks agains my mailserver and no one reacted after 3 days. :D

  25. 1 GB may seem like a lot, by Tower+Laid+Waste · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But as a conoiseur of fine pornography, I find that I can barely manage to keep up with the amount of mail I collect through various mailing lists on my own server. Those attachments can really add up!

    I think 1 GB is certainly a generous offer, maybe even overkill for the average user, but for their more hardcore clientele, I think this will just be a tempting, but ultimately unsatisfying offer.

  26. My Own Announcement by BandwidthHog · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would like to announce that I am now the very first Slashdot user to point out that Spymac.com offers a 1GB email service. That's right, you heard it here first. (and, uhh, don't scroll up.)

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    1. Re:My Own Announcement by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was earlier (don't know about first)

      Spymac beats Google to the punch Thursday April 08, @11:43AM Rejected

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    2. Re:My Own Announcement by platipusrc · · Score: 1

      Spymac Beats Google to the Punch with 1GB email Thursday April 08, @08:28AM Rejected

      ;)

      --
      And the muscular cyborg German dudes dance with sexy French Canadians
    3. Re:My Own Announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spymac Beats Google to the Punch with 1GB email Wednesday January 03, 2001, @08:28AM Rejected

      I was even more first than you folks!!

  27. Better brush up on your Hebrew! by curtisk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Walla! As of ten seconds ago, lack an english version of their site. That could make registering a bit problematic for some. Too bad xPertCodert didn't have a funny mailto: in their submission pointing to @walla.com :p

    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    1. Re:Better brush up on your Hebrew! by Famatra · · Score: 1

      If they can't read english (at least enough to offer an english version of their sign up area) that makes me feel better that they *won't* be reading my mail.

  28. new spam by deep_in_thought · · Score: 2, Funny

    H0w w0ul|) you leik a bigger àéé÷åðéí åøéðâèåðéí ?!? at least I wont be able to read my new spam

  29. First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's just the First with 1 gig mailboxes wouldn't that belong to AOL? 550 mails with 15mb attachments each. (Over 8 gigs) Mabie it should be First FREE service.

  30. Has anyone been to Walla's website? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you did then you would understand why they are a non factor. (HINT: if you can't read hebrew, you probley won't find much use from their portal.)

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  31. one problem by stuffedmonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    I signed up for an account, but now all my messages are showing up written right to left!

  32. Not to mention the Palestinians. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N T.

  33. 1GB by eblis · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why is it okay to refer to 1000MB as 1GB?

    --
    You want what with that?
    1. Re:1GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it is 1GB, and 1 GiB is 1024 MiB

  34. Is this a joke post? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just went to Spymac.com and there is nothing there but a dead server.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Is this a joke post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I just went to Spymac.com and there is nothing there but a dead server.
      Well, it can't be, 'cause I just signed up.
    2. Re:Is this a joke post? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      It took me 3 tries to get the main page to load. Every page on the sign up form failed once or twice. Apparently they have issues with any kind of load.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    3. Re:Is this a joke post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lane, would you mind if I took out Beth?

      No, don't kill Beth!

      Lane

    4. Re:Is this a joke post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It took me 3 tries to get the main page to load. Every page on the sign up form failed once or twice. Apparently they have issues with any kind of load.
      It took me 1 try to get the mainpage to load. Granted, it's slow, but it loaded, and I was able to sign up.
  35. Insightful?? by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why a 30MB attachment limit? They could just say 50TB attachment limit and nothing would really be changed since most mail servers have a 5MB attachment limit, at most. Very few of them have a bigger limit.

    So... if I wanted to make an attachment and my mail server didn't allow anything over 5MB (and under 30MB), I'd be screwed, right?

    Wait! There's a free webbased email service that offers 1GB of space and has a 30MB attachment limit!!

    Welcome to economics 101... encourage everyone to switch to your product...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Insightful?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Cluelessville!
      Population: You

      Everyone on the planet won't switch to their service, they couldn't handle it. When you send an e-mail to someone who uses Yahoo or Hotmail, you run into that 5MB (or less) limit.

      I'd say 9/10 mail server's have an attachment limit of 5MB or less. I've seen many with as little as 2MB.

    2. Re:Insightful?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait! There's a free webbased ...

      Welcome to economics 101...


      Something doesn't fit... :)

    3. Re:Insightful?? by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      > Yahoo or Hotmail, you run into that 5MB (or less) limit

      Exactly, and since 9/10 of the clueless teens that make up the "free webmail" market use those two services, it's even more laughable because they offer, I believe, 4 MB (Y!) and 2 MB (HM) mailboxes. Not just attachment limits.

      My 2 cents on this issue is: Bah!
      Why E-mail? I only use attachments when absolutely necessary. It's bad enough that clueless idiots attach 200MB TIFFs of scanned images when they just want a 200 x 200 JPEG for use on the web. Now that behavior will be encouraged.

      My opinion is that things like W4R32 CD images and the like belong on FTP and BitTorrent. I have never gotten a decent transfer speed from a mailserver. It's slow, and the encoding adds a lot of unnecessary overhead. These protocols offer far more, and are far more flexible. And they're actually designed for this purpose!

      Okay, so industrial-sized file transfer is made for FTP. What about everything else? Like single images, etc.? Well if people would learn to save them in a sane format for their intended use this wouldn't be a problem.

      What would be far more useful than these stupid 1GB e-mail services would be 1GB WebDAV + http shares for the average Joe. Uploads via WebDAV or FTP, or HTTP if you're too dumb to know what the others are, and downloads via same. You'd have a personal space on it that was password-protected, and "Public" folder that you could either leave open to all or put another password on. You could control permissions on public too in case you want to offer anonymous upload or not.

      Any thoughts? I mean, this is basically a web hosting account, but designed specifically for distributing big files among people who know each other.

  36. Re:This could save lives... really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh shut up.

  37. Re:Leave it to the israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You goyim are too slow.

  38. dubious location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    is Israel really the kind of place you want to handle your email when they cant even handle each other ?

  39. wrong... by nsebban · · Score: 0, Redundant

    SpyMac already offers 1G.

    --
    ____
    nico
    Nico-Live
  40. whats the big deal? by blanks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    3 years ago I had over 1200 megs of emails, spam, and attachments through my email provider sitting on their server. They never cared, they told me that as long as they have the free space, and that I dont go over 2000 megs, I would be fine. This wasnt a small provider too, it was a company owned by dsl.com.

    Is the big difference here the fact that its offered as a 1000 megs of space? Im sure many providers dont monitor disk usage for email if you go through small isp's, Ive never had a problem with them.

    1. Re:whats the big deal? by 33degrees · · Score: 1

      This may be true at some places, but I sincerely doubt it's the norm. My provider (sympatico in canada) has a strict (10mb I believe) limit, and if your mailbox fills up beyond that messages will bounce. It's not a big issue for me as it's not the email account I use regularily, but if it was, a 1GB online email account would come in very very handy.

    2. Re:whats the big deal? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was in the same boat as you for years I had about a gig of mail. Then my provider decided to enforce quota's without telling anytbody. The deleted all the oldest mail till my account was under 100 megs. It was a fight to get them to resore it so i could at least get a more recent backup and move eveything to a different server. To many providers just think it's all spam nobody will notice. I have an inbox full of PDF's and Fax Tiffs.

      I guess it was all for the best I reduced my service to email forwarding and ran everythign through my own servers complete with spam assasin.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    3. Re:whats the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1000 megs of space
      Correction. 1024 megs of space.
    4. Re:whats the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more of a liability to keep that much data available.

      For 1, if they were using a webmail system on top of Exchange, 2 gigs was the mailbox limit and still is. If you pass it your mailbox explodes.

      2. Backing up and keeping that much mail live and working is a nightmare. It's bad enough keeping a 41 gb mdb file clean let alone something much bigger with hundreds of thousands of users.

    5. Re:whats the big deal? by SamSim · · Score: 1

      I'm (some would say dangerously) tidy; I delete my old emails as soon as they drop beyond being useful. Hence the hilarious message I used to get on logging into Hotmail (*ducks*) now and then: "You are using 0% of your storage. Get More Storage".

      I don't think I'd ever use 1GB of email space, and it amazes me that others do.

    6. Re:whats the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, Look at it from your ISP's point of view. You having that much mail isn't that much of a problem, until it comes to having to back it up. That's where it really starts to hurt. As others have pointed out, it's not just you that might have alot of mail, but others too.

      And I do agree with you that they shouldn't have started deleting messages without informing people, but then think about how they might have informed people. Most do it with a status page and then just make changes to the email server.

      You don't really expect them to send an email to every user saying hey we'll cut your email box.

      It's generally assumed that the larger email boxes are inactive ones that have just been gathering spam.

  41. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    I'm German, so I feel qualified to answer this comment. Given the choice between an Israeli webmailer and Google, I'd choose Google. Given the choice between my measly 25MB account and Google, I'd stick with downloading my mails to a machine I control.

    The USA have laughable privacy provisions, but whenever I hear about software from Israel, it's either espionage or war related. Considering that, I don't think I need to hear about their privacy laws before I can make the decision.

    (No offense, they're living in a warzone, that's bound to readjust priorities.)

  42. Hee hee hee by DongleFondle · · Score: 1

    "Walla! VP marketing and business development Galit Lifshits Melamed"

    Hee hee.

  43. Anti-Semite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N:T:

    1. Re:Anti-Semite. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Umm. Palestinians are semetic people as well.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:Anti-Semite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Palestinians ARE semites.

      That doesn't mean can't also be anti-semites!

      If you are a Jew/Palestinian and hat Jews/Palestinians for being Jews/Palestinians, you are hating hating other semites, ergo you are anti-semitic!

    3. Re:Anti-Semite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Palestinians ARE NOT semites.

    4. Re:Anti-Semite. by blitziod · · Score: 1

      it does not matter..most of teh nation sthat hate israel have historicly( before the current conflict) killed, repressed or expelled palestnians also.

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
    5. Re:Anti-Semite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Palestinians ARE NOT semites.

      Wrong.
      Look it up, doofus.

      adj.
      1. Of or relating to the Semites or their languages or cultures.

      2. Of, relating to, or constituting a subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic language group that includes Arabic, Hebrew, Amharic, and Aramaic.

      n.
      The Semitic languages. Any one of the Semitic languages.

      Blah, blah, blah....etc...

  44. ! HSIBBUR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ereh gnorw gnihton

  45. I want to be able mail iso images by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

    Yes! Lets kill those puny dialup users, let's send them a real attachment. They'll be lining up for broadband. Mail all those live CD linux distros to every single AOL user on the planet! And it will be cheaper that using the post office like AOL does. I can see it now "You've Got" and 6 hours later "Mail!"

  46. My Hebrew is rusty... by four12 · · Score: 1

    Well, nonexistant. But it's interesting to be able to navigate a foreign language website by hovering over a link and then reading the destination URL in the status bar.

  47. The real issue is accessiblity by scorp1us · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have about 7 email accounts. 3 are personal. One .edu, one hotmail and 1 yahoo.The problem is, I use yahoo and hotmail because I can;t get to my mail once netscape pulls it down off the server. On top of that I'm behind a firewall. So anything I need to act on during a work day ends up at a web account.

    Sure I could use IMAP, but I get about 200 spam a day, and a 30 meg limit. It's not practical. I need globally accesible email respitory. That's what it is about - access anywhere to your email, in a manner that won't fill up your account. My mozilla mail file is several hundred megs, dating back years. I save it all, JIC. And it helps. Even one old email can make thouse 100s of megs worth it.

    If we had a way to store the data on our PCs, then retrive it anywhere, in a consisant manner (meaning Mozilla would place nice with it - and it would play nice with Mozilla (like a shared sent folder)) then I think we'd be 99% happy and not need 1gig of email hosting. It's cheapest on my drive. It's a fixed cost, and I've already paid ot off. 1gig is cheap. ($0.50-$1) (Though it may not be safest, I never back that bitch up)

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:The real issue is accessiblity by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 1

      If we had a way to store the data on our PCs, then retrive it anywhere, in a consisant manner (meaning Mozilla would place nice with it - and it would play nice with Mozilla (like a shared sent folder)) then I think we'd be 99% happy and not need 1gig of email hosting.

      This is funny because you're basically saying:

      If I had 1 gig of mailing hosting on my computer I'd be 99% happy and not need 1gig of email hosting.

      Because you're basically suggesting running a mailserver on your own machine. In reality, a mailserver is a complex thing and not everyone knows enough to run one. So instead we have hosting companies (which host 30gigs or more for a small fee) or Google (which hosts 1 gig in return for showing you ads). Otherwise, feel free to run a mail server and it will handle all of the functionality you mentioned!

    2. Re:The real issue is accessiblity by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      Exactly. But there is no way (that I know of) to keep mozilla in sync with the data store when used for remote mail. (Web-mail that is sent should appear i mozilla's sent-mail folder)

      I don't know how to keep the two consistant.

      Then there's the firewall issue... But I might get around that. via port forwarding. If my provider lets me.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    3. Re:The real issue is accessiblity by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Or you could figure out a way to put the data file from your email application out on the web somewhere and tell whatever email app you run to find it there. If you can find a machine with that application on it, just point it at your data files and you are all set.

      Now where could we find an email application that lets us put the data files out on another computer's hard drive and allows us to point to that data over TCP/IP?

      (It is an honest question, cause Outlook sure as hell won't let me do that. Maybe it will, I never tried designating the location of the data files in a share on an IP address.)

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    4. Re:The real issue is accessiblity by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 1

      This is EXACTLY was IMAP is supposed to do.

    5. Re:The real issue is accessiblity by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 1

      On keeping the data in sync:

      If you have the Sent-Mail folder on your IMAP server, there are a variety of web-mail programs (for example, Horde) and client programs (Mozilla) that will save sent messages to an IMAP folder.

      More generally, if you want any mail folder world-accessible, put it on an IMAP server. It's what IMAP was designed to do!

    6. Re:The real issue is accessiblity by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      On a related note... do any of these 1Gig services support IMAP? I know Spymac doesn't (yet), but what about the Hebrew one and GMail?

    7. Re:The real issue is accessiblity by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be too difficult to write a proxy or a Thunderbird plugin that simulates IMAP for the mail client, while talking to GMail in HTTP.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    8. Re:The real issue is accessiblity by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Not really what I'm looking for... although it would probably be about the same for (almost) any webmail I would think. ....you might be on to something....

  48. Great, a new web-based hard drive for me... by Professr3 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ok, so how long will it take before someone registers 100 accounts or so, writes a program to break their files into chunks, and stores them as email attachments? It would take me about 2 hours to write a file manager that stores large stuff like my star trek collection or backups on their mail servers...

    When in doubt, mod +1 insightful and pray...

    1. Re:Great, a new web-based hard drive for me... by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      You have exceeded your (daily/hourly) quota of bandwidth (for this account/from this IP/etc)

      Google may have the storage but it doesn't have the bandwidth to handle hundreds of thousands of people downloading ISOs from their server at once.

    2. Re:Great, a new web-based hard drive for me... by Professr3 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. So they will have bandwidth limiting too, I suppose. I wonder how that will be determined? In any case, it would probably still work for backups, since those are not necessarily time-critical and can be stored over a period of days.

    3. Re:Great, a new web-based hard drive for me... by russx2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ok, so how long will it take before someone registers 100 accounts or so, writes a program to break their files into chunks, and stores them as email attachments? It would take me about 2 hours to write a file manager that stores large stuff like my star trek collection or backups on their mail servers...

      ... about the same amount of time it'd take Google to implement detection for this sort of behaviour. They're not exactly idiots over at Google and I'm sure they've thought about this. Should be especially easy to detect as well (lots of multiple attachments the same size, lack of normal activity etc.).

      It's a pretty risky endeavour anyway (for backups that is) as you're running the risk everyday of being caught and having your accounts wiped. Not exactly a bullet proof backup solution is it?

    4. Re:Great, a new web-based hard drive for me... by Professr3 · · Score: 1

      Sign up for some spam to provide legit traffic, modulate the size of the attachments, randomize the timing of the transfers... There are always ways around such controls. In the end, someone smart enough would have to be individually audited, which would cause privacy issues. Plus, google doesn't have time to police the millions of free email accounts it's going to have.

    5. Re:Great, a new web-based hard drive for me... by oO+Peeping+Tom+Oo · · Score: 1

      Uh, the counter to that would be to block IP ranges that abuse the bandwidth....

    6. Re:Great, a new web-based hard drive for me... by damiam · · Score: 1

      It's not worth it. Hard drive space goes for about $0.50 per gigabyte these days. With Google, you've got several of orders of magnitude slower transfer, no guarenteed reliability, and no guarentee that your files won't be wiped. Why the hell would you bother?

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    7. Re:Great, a new web-based hard drive for me... by Professr3 · · Score: 1

      Maybe I only have 25 cents?

    8. Re:Great, a new web-based hard drive for me... by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 0

      Plus, google doesn't have time to police the millions of free email accounts it's going to have
      no, but they will have time to check the few thousand that use > 50% of that storage in just a few weeks

      --
      TIAEAE!
  49. Lovely! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Funny
    Instead of Google reading your e-mail, the Mossad will.

    1. Re:Lovely! by aaron_hill2 · · Score: 1

      Instead of Google reading your e-mail, the Mossad will. You mean instead of the NSA...

    2. Re:Lovely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool! Sign me up! At last, there will be someone who'll read my email!

  50. can't sign up by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

    The Walla! portal seems to be in hebrew. One of 5000 other languages I don't know...

    1. Re:can't sign up by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      The Walla! portal seems to be in hebrew. One of 5000 other languages I don't know...

      Yet that doesn't stand in the way when they try to write an English-language press release...

      Seems like stock pumping an nothing more... move along...

    2. Re:can't sign up by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Damn! They picked a language that Babblefish chokes on.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  51. oblig. family guy. by ack154 · · Score: 1

    You have to "wish upon a weinstein" ... :)

  52. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if Slashdot posts an article after the deed is done, people yell "this is not news! It happened, like, yesterday, whoopee!" But if Slashdot posts an article before the deed is done, people yell "too early!"

    Sigh! There's just no pleasing some people...

  53. Whaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this "a dial-up" connection?

  54. Hmm. by ksilebo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Basing this comment on the fact that I have never heard of this company, I wouldn't trust my email to a random company in the middle east to hold any valuable emails. I only see myself using GMail in the future for those newsletter subscriptions, forum email validations, and stuff I want to send home to read later.

  55. one thing's for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People won't be paying retail for the service.

  56. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The observations in his post are both accurate and appropriate. But don't let that stop you from histrionic stereotyping of someone you don't even know.

  57. Am I missing something here? by alispguru · · Score: 1
    It seems to me that the usefulness of lots-n-lots of remote storage for email depends on more than just how much you get. In particular, you also need to know:

    How fast you can up/download it

    What you can do to your mail without downloading it

    Did the internet suddenly get a lot faster while I wasn't looking? Even at cable modem speeds, it would take at least an hour to move 1 GB up or down from a remote server.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:Am I missing something here? by Morgahastu · · Score: 1

      Ugh, it's not about sending 1gb size files.
      It's about having a (in case of most people text emails) an nearly unlimited storage limit so you never have to delete email or get messages bounced back.

      It's not about storing files and downloading them.

      Christ.

  58. Attachments are retarded by DrSkwid · · Score: 0, Troll


    please let them die

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:Attachments are retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DrSkwid strikes again!

    2. Re:Attachments are retarded by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      ooh, shout at me from behind a rock, how insightful

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  59. This will be a boon by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    to those to dumb to work a CD-RW. I mean that. I talk to people all the time whose computers are hosed, but they can't format and reinstall because they couldn't figure out how to write their god damned crap to a CD. With this, let'em send an email (they've already figured out email usually) and download the stuff later. Sure, it's a ridiculously dumb, slow way to back up their data. But hey, if they weren't too dumb to figure out thier CD-RW I wouldn't be posting this comment.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:This will be a boon by greygent · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Use a spell checker before ranting about dumb people, next time.

    2. Re:This will be a boon by akorvemaker · · Score: 1
      Sure, [email is] a ridiculously dumb, slow way to back up their data.

      Actually, it's not that bad. I use email to back up my files. It's fairly efficient for basic stuff, like my documents and things I really don't want to lose. Just .tgz it, gpg it, and upload it to a folder on my imap account. If a meteor strikes my computer and all my CD backups (without hitting me) I can still recover all my critical data. If something manages to take out me, all my backup CDs (in a couple different cities) and all my email backups (two different continents), I think my documents are the least of my worries...

    3. Re:This will be a boon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Email is good but Usenet is better. I upload all my critical documents (encrypted of course) to usenet. There's literally thousands of copies of my documents spread around the globe. If you make your encrypted documents look like text, you can get Google to archive your backups for like 20 years. Can't beat that.

    4. Re:This will be a boon by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 0

      I mean that. I talk to people all the time whose computers are hosed, but they can't format and reinstall because they couldn't figure out how to write their god damned crap to a CD.

      you really think someone that dumb should be allowed to format their pc and install their fucking OS?!?

      --
      TIAEAE!
  60. question by mabu · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Will the server be taken offline on Saturdays?

  61. At least Walla won't ... by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 1

    get sued over privacy concerns. It really helps to not be an American company sometimes.

    Of course, think of all the international "customers" who will deliberately not choose Walla because of its nationality. Now, if they were Indian or Japanese ...

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
  62. What I want to know by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Is what kind of anti-spam system Gmail is going to have. I mean, the moment Gmail goes live (and probably already) spammers are going to be targeting every conciveable email address @gmail.com. Anyone who gets a 'good' name is going to get spammed.

    But you'd think, they're google, they're going to be really good at looking at information and classifying it, they should be able to get some great anti-spam systems setup. I'd figure that anti-spam would be part of the marketing for any email provider these days.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  63. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't accept a Palestinian webmailer either, if that is any consolation. I don't think I've ever heard about anything computer related coming from there though, except Earthstation5 allegedly (but most likely not really) operating from there.

  64. Someone here should try to beat them both by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 1

    I mean, come on, guys, it's not that hard to set up a mail server with a web interface that allows anonymous accounts and gives everyone 1 GB of storage.

    Just don't advertise it... and try to keep your number of accounts under about 100, and you're all set. Singlehandedly, you have just defeated both the most successful search engine in history, and the government of Israel.

    Oh, man.. now I've got to do that... I wonder how many people would want an user@youhavenochancetosurvivemakeyourtime.com address...

    --
    "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
    1. Re:Someone here should try to beat them both by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 1

      and the government of Israel

      And yes, I know this is inaccurate, but it was fun to say.

      --
      "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
  65. Re:This could save lives... really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You could troll better....really

    So by that synapse-blistering logic you have, the bombers would then just re-adjust their targets to dorms perhaps...Am I stretching?

  66. Re:Israel? by jaaron · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Well, the nazis will hate this one for sure.

    I think this is the fastest invocation of Godwin's Law on /. ever. One post!

    --
    Who said Freedom was Fair?
  67. How do you make retards understand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You tell them the truth over and over until they eat the whole thing.

    So in that vein, HEY MORON. Spymac got 1 gig e-mail already.

    Somebody else please repeat this. Send some copies to CNN too.

  68. Palestinian webmailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I wouldn't accept a Palestinian webmailer either"

    There is something about the prospect of your computer blowing up when it gets e-mail.

  69. bravo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well said

  70. WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a start SpyMac offers 1GB data storage, second of all timothy? WTF? Don't you do any research at all?

    Stupid submitions like this shouldn't make it this far, any regular /.'er can see how stupid this was, it's not even remotely true.

  71. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except in this case, it didn't end the conversation. It's like the reverse of it or something.

  72. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'd agree with you that a war of extermination is going on in the Middle East, but it ain't the Palestinians who are doing the exterminating.

  73. Re:Israel? by strictnein · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The observations in his post are both accurate and appropriate.

    This is accurate and appropriate:
    I'm German, so I feel qualified to answer this comment. Given the choice between an Israeli webmailer and Google, I'd choose Google.

    Without taking into account features, performance, etc. etc. he picks Google based on the fact that the other one is from Israel. This is accurate? How is the fact that he is from Germany qualify him to post that?

    But don't let that stop you from histrionic stereotyping of someone you don't even know.
    I won't, especially when responding to someone who is doing the same. The only thing I know about him is what they posted. So, I will base my views on the poster based on the only source of information I have: what they provided me.

    but whenever I hear about software from Israel, it's either espionage or war related

    Guess he's never heard of ICQ?

  74. Hmm... by natrius · · Score: 1

    Is Walla! Hebrew for Yahoo!?

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually Arabic for "wow". HTH.

  75. TERRORISM!! by NineNine · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Personally, I won't be using any Israeli mail service. With Bush & Ashcroft's nifty Patriot Act, I could easily be tagged as a terrorist, and imprisoned without a trial.

    1. Re:TERRORISM!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I won't be using any Israeli mail service. With Bush & Ashcroft's nifty Patriot Act, I could easily be tagged as a terrorist, and imprisoned without a trial.

      Silly, the Israelis are the good guys, it's the Palestinians who are terrorists.

      Remember: oppressed Palestinian attacks illegal occupying army = EVIL, heavily armed Israeli helicopter gunship launches guided missile into Palestinian creche = GOOD.

      War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. Trolling is insightful.

    2. Re:TERRORISM!! by Lewis+Daggart · · Score: 1

      Uh.. how is this insightfull? Using an internet service based in israel, a democratic country and the US's major (some would say only) ally in the middle east, is somehow going to get us labled as terrorists. I can't even understand the thinking that went into this post.

  76. Definition of antisemitic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    anti-Semite.
    One who discriminates against or who is hostile toward or prejudiced against Jews.

    anti-Semitic adj.

    1. Re:Definition of antisemitic by Yeochee · · Score: 1, Troll

      Which is different of being opposed to the occupation of Palestine by Israel. Not agreeing with Israeli policy does not make you anti-semitic.

  77. Re:This could save lives... really by autopr0n · · Score: 0, Troll

    Israeli buses, of course, are notorious targets for "suicide" (homicide) bombers

    The term "homicide bomber" has got to be one of the most idiotic terms ever invented. First of all, it's only applied to suicide bombers, you never hear about bombers who don't kill themselves refered to that way. It's just a euphamism for people who, for whatever reason, belive that calling a suicide bomber a suicide bomber somehow makes their crime less wrong. But it's completely redundant. Why not just call them 'bombers'.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  78. To those who can't read Hebrew by Kickasso · · Score: 1

    (and English, I might add): THE SERVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE YET. Don't try to find the subscription link. It's not there.

  79. Then you haven't heard of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I'd agree with you that a war of extermination is going on in the Middle East, but it ain't the Palestinians who are doing the exterminating"

    Then you obviously haven't heard of a little group called Hamas, which has a charter calling for the extermination of the Israelis (with text lifted from Nazi documents from the 1930s included in it).

    1. Re:Then you haven't heard of... by evilmonkey_666 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      "I'd agree with you that a war of extermination is going on in the Middle East, but it ain't the Palestinians who are doing the exterminating"

      Then you obviously haven't heard of a little group called Hamas, which has a charter calling for the extermination of the Israelis (with text lifted from Nazi documents from the 1930s included in it).

      Hamas is an independant terrorist organisation. Holding the entire nation of Palestine responsible for the actions of an extreme minority would be like invading Ireland because of the IRA!

      --


      - PS. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R where eliminated.
    2. Re:Then you haven't heard of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 70% of Palestinians support the actions of Hamas at least in word.

    3. Re:Then you haven't heard of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support, not the actions, but the cry for justice, and the desire to resist instead of lying down and going away.

      Most of Hamas' activity is in charity, at that; they are much more effective at that and far less corrupt than the Palestinian Authority, sadly.

      What percent of the Irish supported the demands of the IRA, do you suppose?

  80. I guess my sentiments are... by TwistedGreen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    who cares?

    This is hardly a big deal. It's merely an imaginary milestone that we think is important, but is really completely relevant. Is this any kind of technical feat? No. Is this even useful? Not for the majority of people.

    And besides, as a number of people have pointed out already, the title of "first 1 GB e-mail service provider" is taken.

  81. Re:This could save lives... really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, did you confuse Slashdot with your personal blog?

  82. Size is not all that matters by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Interesting
    GMail not only will have 1Gb mail capacity, but also (from what i remember from the gmail announcement) spam/virus protection (ok, this company will have it also, but not sure how good/accurate will it be against google, but is something that could mark a clear difference between both), non bloated pages (should check how much weight pages from company, if have graphic ads will be in big disadvantage against google text ads at the very least), multilingual interface, and... well, is google behind, for good or bad (if it was Microsoft, will be a very bad, but still have some trust in google over companies that i simply don't know) and probably future integration with more things from google.

    Not have big problems against the origin of the company, but maybe things could be slower for US residents or countries that have to connect thru US to reach it, or if it have some kind of success, if their (and maybe their country) bandwidth could handle the load that handles google already.

    1. Re:Size is not all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although Google certainly wins over Walla! on stability and likely proficiency at searching and filtering, no-one seems to have mentioned POP or similar support.

      As far as I can see, the one thing spymac offers in the ability to filter / search locally while still leaving the originals in the 1G storage for the record.

      And since OS X Mail.app is pretty good at searching and filtering, the spymac offerring looks pretty nice! (It also actually exists, right now, unlike the competition :) )

  83. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without taking into account features, performance, etc. etc. he picks Google based on the fact that the other one is from Israel.

    He didn't just object to the service being Israeli in origin, and you know it. He specifically mentioned Israel's history and practices when it comes to software and data processing services. Based on Israel's track record on repsecting the rights of non-Israeli citizens, I'd say his decision is quite wise.

    Nice try, though. Now shut the fuck up and let the grownups talk.

  84. Hrm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Would a Jew who hates himself or others for being Jewish also be an anti-Semite?

    You know, typical self-hating Jews and all that stuff you read about.

  85. *irrelevant by TwistedGreen · · Score: 2, Funny

    preview preview preview

  86. Turkey SPAM (R) by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not all types of SPAM are made out of pork. See:
    http://www.spam.com/sp/sp_ort.htm

  87. Re:Israel? by pantycrickets · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think this is the fastest invocation of Godwin's Law on /. ever. One post!

    "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."

    This has nothing to do with Godwin's Law. He wasn't making a comparison at all, but a joke.

    /Captain Literal

  88. WTF are you talking about? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Google getting sued over privacy concerns? If you don't agree to their privacy statement, don't apply. I'm sure everyone who signs up must click a checkbox indicating that they read it.

    And it's not like people can't sue other people in isreal.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:WTF are you talking about? by thebatlab · · Score: 1

      Grandparent is just another in a long line of knee-jerk reactors ever so present not only on /. but in the world nowadays. Everything that happens is an excuse for them to raise an alarm so they can appear smart. I find it best to smile and nod as my brain is going "Won't this person please shut up. If they don't I just might jab this pen into my eyeball so at least I won't have to look at them while they're talking"

  89. Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But expect trouble at Yom Kippur. Seriously.

  90. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's good to hear of Germans being suspicious of the Jews?

    Uh, no you Zionist fucktard. I said Israelis, not Jews. Maybe you forgot that 20% of the Israeli population is Arab?

    Asshat.

  91. Re:Israel? by McAddress · · Score: 5, Funny
    I'm German, so I feel qualified to answer this comment. Given the choice between an Israeli webmailer and Google, I'd choose Google. Without taking into account features, performance, etc. etc. he picks Google based on the fact that the other one is from Israel. This is accurate? How is the fact that he is from Germany qualify him to post that?

    Perhaps he meant that as a German, he was well qualified to make anti-semetic statements.

  92. Few thoughts by xPertCodert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a guy who had originally submitted the story, I must say, that I have never heard of SpyMac service before... I, also, think that in a next couple of month we'll see an explosion in web-based large data storage offerings from both global and local portals and providers. This will signify a huge change in their business models and offerings and we'll see how people will move not only e-mails but other useful information as well, for example - true world-wide collaboration tools, calendars, phone directories, photo repositories, document storage etc. This is are real threat to Micro$oft as well, since you won't need beefed up Very Very Very Long Horn to do 99% of your daily stuff. As for all those "obscure mid-east country" posts, I have to say that Israel is one of the most advanced country in the world in everything technology related. It has one of the highest broadband internet penetration rates as well so 30 MB attachments make a lot of sense. It is, also, worth noting that any ./ user at any given time is using at least one or two technologies developed in Israel whether it's CPU, instant-messaging service or just a simple router

  93. Re:This could save lives... really by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

    Uh, yeah, right. Like a 30 MB attachment can't be sent by some other means, like maybe some kind of file transfer application? It's too bad Mirabilis was bought by AOL, because then the poor Israelis forced to hide in their own homes could talk to one another and transfer files are large as they can store without having to venture outside. Oh, wait..

  94. Re:This could save lives... really by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

    How about all the subtle ways that better technology affects lives? With all that e-mail capacity, maybe a few Israeli students won't have to take the crosstown bus to meet and swap files.

    Israeli buses, of course, are notorious targets for "suicide" (homicide) bombers. Students form a disproportionately large number of the bombers' victims. So maybe a life or two will be spared thanks to this service. Am I stretching? Possibly. But it's food for thought, nonetheless.


    Yep, thank god for huge email attachments. I, too, would walk the streets and brave suicidal terrorists if all I had to work with was ftp, http, or the other 10,000 methods already out there for transfering files...

    --
    What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  95. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How do you know he is German and not some pimply-faced American 14-year-old trolling from his mom's PC?

    P.S.: Do you also like to have hot sex with a mare?

  96. Re:Israel? by strictnein · · Score: 1

    He didn't just object to the service being Israeli in origin, and you know it

    You seem to miss the part in his post where he mentions that he is from Germany. What else does that imply?

    Nice try, though. Now shut the fuck up and let the grownups talk.

    Interesting, do "grownups" such as yourself always talk behind a veil of anonymity? I wasn't persuaded by your post until I read your powerful use of the word "fuck". But now... now I feel you must be right.

  97. cut out redundancy... relational model by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Funny


    Follow the relational database model of data storage... For attachments and messages that are duplicates across many accounts, just store one copy and put pointers to that copy in each person's account. According to that article earlier this week, 30% of all email is spam, so right there, you can save 30% of your disk space by only storing one copy of each spam. And think of all the savings in virus attachments, too!
    1. Re:cut out redundancy... relational model by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      Ok, but users generally delete their spam, so they would use a negligible amount of their space for spam. Also, spam filtering happens after messages are delivered, so they still pay for the CPU usage to classify spam, and the bandwidth to receive it. So, google is still spending money without any return, right? I like the idea of having a gig of email storage and using google to search through it, but I really am hesitant to sign up, because, after all, they are making their money some way. Selling marketing info? Targeted ads at the bottom of all emails sent? Time will tell.

    2. Re:cut out redundancy... relational model by William+Tanksley · · Score: 2, Informative

      I strongly recommend you read Google's Gmail FAQ rather than asking Slashdot users :-). They answer this question VERY clearly.

      They're going to pay for the space by putting AdSense ads next to some emails, based on the user's emails. Just like how they pay for the Google search.

      It's possible that the result will be more valuable than the search ads for them, since they'll have more information based on which to target the ads, so advertisers will have a higher response rate.

      -Billy

  98. I can see the Monty Python already. by numbski · · Score: 1

    Bring out your warez! *dong*

    Can you take it?

    But it hasn't even been cracked yet.

    I have product activation...I'll be reporting you soon.

    *pulls out a hex editor.....CRACK*

    *Loads it into the cart*

    Bring out your warez! *dong*

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  99. The battle has begun by KalvinB · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Except this isn't really a battle. The Iraqi web-portal isn't giving people an @google.com or @gmail.com account. Much of the reason people sign up for an e-mail service is the domain name. It really doesn't matter how great the offering is, not too many people are going to get an @goat[...].cx e-mail account.

    When Google announced its GMail on April 1st I took it seriously and decided to improve my e-mail service offering. It's now accessible over the web, SSL secured, fully text searchable and free. Before it was POP3 only, not secured and not free. I'm going to look into adding IMAP access as well. 15,000KB attachment limit and no storage limits as long as you don't try to use it as a remote harddrive.

    You also don't need an existing e-mail account to sign up. Which is nice if you need to sign up for a service and really don't care to give them any real information.

    Also, when you delete a message, it's gone.

    Ben

    1. Re:The battle has begun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not too many, @goatse?!?!

      You could sell those, even as dumbforwarders, for $9.95 on thinkgeek for crying-out-loud.

    2. Re:The battle has begun by topynate · · Score: 1

      How will you prevent people using it as a remote harddrive? By enforcing a quota? What if, say, I got a friend to email me 10 ISOs, split into 15meg chunks(yes, I realise this would be about 500 emails). Would you have a word?

    3. Re:The battle has begun by Complicity · · Score: 1
      I'm going to look into adding IMAP access as well.
      You work for AOL, don't you! ;)
      --
      - c -
    4. Re:The battle has begun by moitz · · Score: 1

      Might wanna take "Games" outta your keywords. Got blocked by Websense trying to get to your page to check out your setup. Stupid work.

      -moitz-

      --
      Screw 'em...who cares what anyone thinks.
    5. Re:The battle has begun by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Two questions:

      Why SSL on the connection, the mail got to your server over an unencrypted connection, what's the point in starting when its already been naked in the wild?

      What FS are you running on your server than you can guarentee that when a message is deleted its gone? Most just flag it as deleted but the bytes stay there until they're overwritten.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    6. Re:The battle has begun by cuzality · · Score: 1


      I suffer from Websense at work as well, but I can get to the indie-mail site by using the URL https://imail.icarusindie.com. (Note the https://.)

      I first read about indie-mail a few weeks ago during the first Gmail flare-up, and it's pretty cool. I haven't decided whether or not to switch primary email duties to the new account I created there or not (I have a paid account with fastmail.fm which I have been happily using for a couple of years, but recently have been butting up against the 16MB "Member" account limit), but I have redirected a number of messages to the new inbox and played around with the search -- it works great. The interface is very sparse and clean -- no folders, just an inbox (which can be sorted by date, sender, etc.) and search box.

      Very nice. Free also. Can also get nice short usernames since the service has not been clogged up like the big providers...

    7. Re:The battle has begun by Astastrafal · · Score: 1
      Why SSL on the connection, the mail got to your server over an unencrypted connection, what's the point in starting when its already been naked in the wild?


      With SSL, both your username and your password are transmitted encrypted. A major draw for paranoids everywhere.
  100. Wow! by ddelrio · · Score: 1

    A gigabyte of spam in my inbox. I can't wait.

  101. Re:This could save lives... really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The term "homicide bomber" has got to be one of the most idiotic terms ever invented. First of all, it's only applied to suicide bombers, you never hear about bombers who don't kill themselves refered to that way. It's just a euphamism for people who, for whatever reason, belive that calling a suicide bomber a suicide bomber somehow makes their crime less wrong. But it's completely redundant. Why not just call them 'bombers'.

    Not to mention that probably the majority of suicide bombers only succeed in killing themselves (okay, they hurt a lot of other people badly, but I'd rather lose an arm than die). So most of them aren't even homicides.

    The only terms I can think of that I hate more than "homicide bomber" are "metrosexual" and "freedom fries".

  102. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    I thought Germans were so "progressive". Hmm...

    At least Germany admitted it wronged people. The same can't be said for Israel which perpetrates ethnic cleansing on a daily basis and refuses to acknowledge it's doing anything wrong.

    It was bad when Hitler wanted to make Germany a 'pure' state but when every Israeli Prime Minister says the goal is to have Israel be a jewish only state, that's ok.

  103. just great by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    email attachments, especially binary attachments, don't need to increase in size. they need to be reduced. use something intended to be a File Transfer Protocol.

    1. Re:just great by thebatlab · · Score: 1

      So everybody is supposed to set up an ftp server on their machine to serve out a file. Yes, 30MB is a huge attachment but it keeps the message intended to go with the file tied together nicely with the file. I'd hate to receive a 30MB file in an email but I can see where it can be useful from time to time especially in a business setting.

    2. Re:just great by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      Well basically I think some new application that couples FTP or similar protocol to email in a way transparent to the user would be nice.

      This doesn't necesitate a user setting up an FTP server on their machine, although I imagine they could do it. If it would benefit an ISP to provide such an email attachment FTP server (instead of allowing attachments directly in email) in terms of mail server load, then I could see them offering the service of hosting such an file transfer server. A requirement on the recipient might be that they need to save that file to their disk within a certain time period after which the file server deletes it. ...logistical obstacles abound, I'm sure, but I think we should always be looking for a better way to do things. huge attachments in email impacts things it shouldn't need to impact. The most obvious would be waiting for such an attachment before downloading the rest of your mail.

    3. Re:just great by thebatlab · · Score: 1

      "Well basically I think some new application that couples FTP or similar protocol to email in a way transparent to the user would be nice."

      Say something like having the attachment be encoded right into the email...

      Maybe I'm missing something here in what exactly you're thinking. It seems like you would rather mail servers set up an ftp server and there be a way for users to interact with this server, without knowing it's an ftp server, to get their attachments. This will apparently decrease mail server load. I'm not sure how it would do that since the user would still be accessing the attachment at some point.

      "The most obvious would be waiting for such an attachment before downloading the rest of your mail."

      That's about the only part of this that makes sense to me. Maybe that was the whole point?

  104. The idea by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    is that since now you can send larger attachments, you'll tell your friends to sign up so they can recieve them. It's an easy way to encourage existing users to advertise your service.

    Ben

  105. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he is from Germany. What else does that imply?

    Please elaborate.
    My mentioning that I'm German was just tongue-in-cheek linguistic glue, but now I do find it interesting that being cautious regarding a company in the middle east is unacceptable behaviour if you're German.

  106. Pr0n by Pizentios · · Score: 0

    now, i'll be able to store all my porn in my email....heh

    --
    -Pizentios
  107. Well, duh..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is just reselling it with their branding.

  108. Re:Israel? by ron_ivi · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Slashdot Slashdot has mentioned others. 1GB today isn't really worth any more today than the few MB was when HotMail started.

    The only real news here is that you don't see more companies offering reasonable disk space for their hosting and email in the day of the $79 200GB hard drive.

  109. Practice your Hebrew.. by -tji · · Score: 1

    I went to the site linked from the article.. The portal company is called "Walla", http://www.walla.co.il/.

    Just remember, Hebrew is writted right to left.. Now go ahead and translate the page, register for an account, and you're all set..

  110. yeah and you are anti-semantic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N:T:.

  111. Re:Israel? by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Why is it that anyone who challenges Israel's fucked up policies is immediately labeled an anti-semite? Could it be that noone cares about their religion but the way they thrust themselves on the world. I am very sympathetic to the sufferers of the holocaust - it was an EXTREMELY inhumane action that should have never been able to occur. Truman should also never allowed Israel to be created, displacing all of the Palestinians. He was warned that what is happening now would indeed occur. I understand after the displacement of the Jewish people from Russia etc that it would be desirous to have their own nation. The reality is that this Zionist policy has cost thousands of lives and will ultimately lead to the destruction of the Jewish people (remember, you are a minority in that area. You could kill and kill, but the Arab people will outlast you)

    The point is Israel - NOONE CARES WHAT RELIGION YOU ARE - JUST QUIT BEING SUCH ASSHOLES!!! ZIONISM IS INHUMANE TO THE REST OF THE WORLD.

    Please, no more death to further YOUR people at the expense of others. It is called anti-semetic when someone dislikes Jews, but what is it called when Jews hate everyone else? It is like "White man's guilt" because of slavery. We have "Christian Guilt" due to the holocaust and thus allow Israel to do some very oppresive things. Noone wants to be called anti-semetic for standing up to them.
    This is not an anti-semetic statement. I have many jewish friends, have dated a few jewish girls and have no problem with jews in general - just Israeli policies. There are also many Jews that completely disagree with Zionist policies. Please, quit trying to say everyone who doesn't agree with you(Israel) is anti-semetic. Get over yourself, you are not the "chosen ones", you're just like everyone else.

    --
    ymmv
  112. Writted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody must have stoled your spell checker.

  113. Common sense by mrkitty · · Score: 1

    Common sense is often popular...

    --
    Believe me, if I started murdering people, there would be none of you left.
  114. Heil Hitler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Oh right! The Muslims certainly can't think for themselves!"

    Since an overwhelming majority of them favor exterminating Jewish people, they certainly aren't being very rational.

    "Look at some non-Western media and see the atrocities that the Israeli war machine is committing."

    You mean such "unbiased" sources as Al Jazeera? Sorry, you are buying into antisemitic myths.

    "Then you can honestly say whether or not Israel is one of the biggest threats facing the world today."

    They are only a threat to complete domination of the Aryan race and realization of Arab goals of subjugation and/or extermination of Jewish people. Now, go back to reading "Mein Kampf". You can get some more ideas there.

    1. Re:Heil Hitler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Letsee, you're probably an Israeli, a young male under 30, (I mean who else reads Slashdot?). That without a doubt means you're likely serving in the Israeli Offense Forces. Notice I didn't call it the IDF, a bullshit acronym that has no bearings on reality. This without a doubt invalidates anything you have to say on this matter. Unbiased observers of this conflict can only come to two clear conclusions:
      • Israel is the cause of Middle East instability.
      • Palestinians are a defenseless people that are daily oppressed and humiliated.
      The only way there will be peace in the Middle East is when Israel owns up to its racist philosophy and takes responsibility for their actions, beginning with the land theft of 1948.
    2. Re:Heil Hitler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever even heard of the six day war?

      "The only way there will be peace in the Middle East is when Israel owns up to its racist philosophy and takes responsibility for their actions, beginning with the land theft of 1948."

      Hamas has sworn to destroy Israel, repeatedly. They don't want peace, by their own admission. Ah, but of course it's all Israel's fault (isn't it always the Jews causing the problems? I mean, who else could it be? They run the world!)

    3. Re:Heil Hitler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel provoked the Six Day War. Read what Edward Said wrote on the matter for an honest account of why Arabs revolted against Israeli aggression. Gamal Abdul Nasser was a heroic visionary during that war. And lest you forget, Israel broke all international law when it seized more of Palestine in 1967 (the first illegal theft was in 1948). Israel forfeited any sympathy when they stole the West Bank and Gaza.

    4. Re:Heil Hitler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just out of curiosity, do you actually believe the shit that you type?

  115. I'm waiting... by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    I built Indie-Mail so that it would be at least somewhat comparable feature wise to what GMail was advertising. The main thing was the ability to search your e-mails. I'm not aware of any other free services besides Indie-Mail and GMail that have that and GMail isn't out yet. There's also one graphic on the entire site: the logo. Everything else is text. The interface is very intuitive and fast. Google doesn't have the market cornered in that area.

    I also don't know if GMail requires an existing e-mail account to sign up. Mine doesn't. I don't require any personal information.

    But, I'm waiting for them to go public so I can sign up and compare features to see where mine needs some work.

    Ben

    1. Re:I'm waiting... by Bitseeker · · Score: 1

      Some people might be wary that your SSL certificate is self-verified and you have no privacy policy.

  116. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting, do "grownups" such as yourself always talk behind a veil of anonymity? But you're not anonymous? I tried looking up "strictnein" in the phone book so I could track you down and confront you personally, tough guy, but you were nowhere to be found.

  117. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how'd this get modded to +2 Insightful?!?!? Are all the non-racist mods taking the day off today?

  118. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you have against Americans?

    Ponder that for a while without giving me the standard 'bullshit' answers.

  119. Imperialist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Maybe you should consider losing that imperialist mindset"

    The parent post did not defend imperialism at all. However, you yourself have given voice to the lies given by Arab imperialists who want to invade and conquer all of Israel.

    1. Re:Imperialist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Arab imperialists who want to invade and conquer all of Israel." You say that like it's a bad thing.

  120. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gives a fuck? Godwin's 'Law' is bullshit.

  121. Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mossad will read your e-mail anyway.

  122. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a war. They're way past the stage where it makes sense to see who started it. Consequently, taking sides based on whose deeds are more atrocious is silly. Every Palestinian suicide bomber and every Palestinian who indoctrinates kids to become martyrs is absolutely misguided as to the way out of this mess. Saying that one side is a warmongering people that should not be trusted does not imply that the other side is any better.

  123. Did EVERYBODY miss the train on this? by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Now, listen. Google's email service is not about the one-gigabyte limit.

    Ok, so it's a huge number, and so everybody seems to have stared themselves blind at it, and missed the print underneath.

    Google's email service is about having your email searchable. About retrieving old email by searching for a part of it. About eliminating the need for folders, dates, keywords to remember your mail. About a all-in-one-bucket, always-available mail store, that's accessed by searching rather than sorting and browsing.

    Forget about the one-gigabyte limit. That's just tweaking parameters that others already have. It's nothing really innovative.

    What's really new is their entire approach.

    1. Re:Did EVERYBODY miss the train on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how is this any better than Evolution's vfolders, Remail's conversations, or Haystack's piles?

    2. Re:Did EVERYBODY miss the train on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh cool, now I can search my mail! Can I search for complicated stuff too, like "three groups of numbers"? Regular expressions maybe?

      Oh, that's right. Everyone can already do that.

      grep 'whatchalookingfor' mailbox

  124. Re:Israel? by strictnein · · Score: 1

    My mentioning that I'm German was just tongue-in-cheek linguistic glue, but now I do find it interesting that being cautious regarding a company in the middle east is unacceptable behaviour if you're German.

    The issue is this: why does it matter that from Germany? The only reason one would point it out, and state that they then have a unique viewpoint, is if they wanted to draw attentiont to that fact and imply that them being from Germany would make them not want to trust an Israeli company.

  125. Virus protection by KalvinB · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hotmail has McAfee, Indie-Mail has McAfee. GMail will no doubt have something similar. However when MyDoom came out my e-mail server was deleting those virus e-mails before the virus scanner was. If you look in the filter list on the Indie-Mail web-site one of the entries is a long string of letters and numbers. That's the signiture I found and used to kill off MyDoom before the VirusScan was updated and took care of it, itself.

    The problem with spam protection is that you can't be overly agressive when you're dealing with other people's e-mail. That's why I only use URL filtering. It's very effective and inflicts no collateral damage. The downside is that it has to be manually maintained. But I have enough of the process automated that it's not that big of a deal. It's about 15 minutes of my time every few days to update the filter.

    GMail will no doubt be utilizing it's search technology to analyze e-mails reported as spam to make it's system more effective and more automated.

    Ben

  126. Spymac is the joke by medication · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Spymac hasn't been making a stink about it being the first to offer this service because they're a sham. I see a lot of posts here about not being able to establish an account going back weeks (I remember your post when the gmail article was here).
    Are you using it? If so what's your address? I don't buy that they're actually doing anything but building a db of advertising data.

    --
    "If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit." - Mitch Hedberg
    1. Re:Spymac is the joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have an email address at spymac. It works. At least as a normal email address. Attachment upload speed is very poor though, so I haven't really had the chance to test it out as a 1GB account.

    2. Re:Spymac is the joke by mtnharo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Their service is real and works fine. I have an account: greengeek AT spymac DOT com. However, the problem with their service is due to the fact that they were once a very small mac-users forum/service. When Google made their announcement, spymac gained notoriety for having a 1 gig email service up and running already. Their subscriber base jumped from They got /.ed and farked, as well as having articles in several mac sites and I think zdnet or cnet too. Also, most of the services of the site are still very new, some are still in "beta" and are lacking features. They are deserving of pity for the raping of their bandwidth and servers, but they probably should have expected it too.

    3. Re:Spymac is the joke by Gondorian+Warrior · · Score: 1

      The user base of Spymac was around 40,000 before they they introduced the 1GB of email storage. The current membership is around 234651. They are first and foremost a Apple Rumor site, hence the name SpyMac. When a HUGE number of new members without any interest in Mccs signed up the older membership were up in arms. To try and stop the core members leaving all the resources have been pumped into keeping the site live (but nothing can withstand /.) and to keep the core serveices going. It seems priority is being given to older members for all non core services email,websites, blogs etc. GW

    4. Re:Spymac is the joke by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that the hosted sites have been running more or less the same despite the huge load... those seem to be on seperate servers from the main page.

  127. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Voila !

  128. 1GB email invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I invented the 1GB email service.

    Al Gore

  129. 30 MB per attachment? by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 2, Funny

    THAT may give a completely new meaning to spam!

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  130. Spymac did it! by stankyho · · Score: 1


    Well, since no one has mentioned it yet.

    Spymac did it!

    --

    ---
    eeww, I'll have a crab juice.
  131. Gmail... by burns210 · · Score: 1

    should have 'smart playlist' type folder such as itunes... have a 'work' 'recent' 'most replied to' 'from parents' 'from kids'... All these folders auto sort information via rules you predefine, and mail can be in multiple smart folder entries... it is like a database query, auto updating.

    They sounded useless, until i used itunes... they are REALLY usefull to have.

  132. Spymac not hosted on Macs by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

    Your silly, baseless comment notwithstanding...

    Actually, it's hosted on Linux. Run nmap on it.

    1. Re:Spymac not hosted on Macs by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      would you be able to check what version of linux that is run on it? although i see that it would be pretty expensive (hardware wise) to run PPC linux (which is most likely indicating a mac setup, just not Mac-OS on Mac), it would indicate whether or not they are running it on mac or x86

  133. They Don't Even Read Slashdot by Bitseeker · · Score: 1

    Or they would've known about Spymac long ago. Why would you want to use email from a company that doesn't read /.?

    1. Re:They Don't Even Read Slashdot by bsd+troll · · Score: 0

      Because they get work done?

    2. Re:They Don't Even Read Slashdot by Bitseeker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they get work done: Posting false news about being first and thus looking like absolute dolts. I guess that's better than being up to date on current events in your industry.

    3. Re:They Don't Even Read Slashdot by bsd+troll · · Score: 0

      Certainly better than whinging on Slashdot.

  134. This guy's not redundant, the other guy was. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy posted first. Seems unfair to mod him down.

  135. They are semmeln. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, semmeln.

    Or maybe spaetzle!

    Mmmmmh, Palestinians.

    Suicide bomber flambé!

  136. The next P2P? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Is it going to be possible to use these free 1GB email accounts (from Google and others) for storage and distribution of pirated materials?

    Could this become the next P2P?

  137. I have a privacy policy by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    It's in the TOS. "Unless required by law, nobody is getting your information." And since I don't require personal information to get an account, there's not much I can give up.

    And the SSL isn't to protect the users from me. E-mail doesn't get stored encrypted. The SSL is for securing the transmission so nobody can snoop on your e-mail while it's being recieved or sent.

    There is no point in paying for a certificate. Who is it protecting and how? The self signed certificate protects the users in every needed way. Namely by encrypting the connection.

    Ben

    1. Re:I have a privacy policy by Bitseeker · · Score: 1
      Well, burying the privacy policy in the TOS isn't very user-friendly. And it's more than just personal information in signing up. It's also any information in the stored emails.

      For most users (i.e. non-Slashdot readers), seeing a warning message about the connection's validity doesn't bode well for their comfort level and/or acceptance of the service. They don't know the ins and outs of SSL, just that your server gives them a security warning.

    2. Re:I have a privacy policy by torinth · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to point out that you seem to misunderstand encryption. A self-signed SSL certificate is a completely useless item on the Internet. It's useful for closed systems, but not what you're trying to accomplish. What you want is the ability for users to know that your and only your server is receiving their data (aka no snooping). A self-signed SSL certificate does doesn't provide that. You need to counteract man-in-the-middle attacks by using a reputable and recognized CA. As it stands, anybody running a proxy could self-sign their own certificate as you, then act as a relay from point to point--looking at every piece of data while it passes.

  138. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the top of the thread, you'll find a comment saying that Nazis must hate this service. It was also the first post under this story, making it an attractive comment to post under (and I'm not even karmawhoring). So I created a transition by mentioning that I'm German and subsequently tried to make it clear that my reservations against this service are based on my impression that the Israeli software industry focuses on certain types of applications. I honestly did not expect someone to think that Germans actually like to label themselves as Nazis, so I refrained from marking it as tongue-in-cheek.

  139. Re:This could save lives... really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    touche

  140. Re:Israel? by MouseR · · Score: 1

    AMEN!

    Oh! Maybe not. But you get the picture.

  141. Heil Hitler, you nazi! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Letsee, you're probably an Israeli, a young male under 30"

    Call me a proud Jew then. Actually, I'm not. However, neo-nazis like you have called me "Jewish" just for insisting that Jewish people, too, have a right to live. I've been called black for sticking up for civil rights for blacks as well.

    "Israel is the cause of Middle East instability"

    Blaming the victim here is like blaming Blacks in the South for "civil rights conflicts" in the 1960s.

    "The only way there will be peace in the Middle East is when Israel owns up to its racist philosophy"

    It doesn't have one to give up. Really, the only way there will be peace in the Middle East is when the Arab aggressors adopt a "live and let live" policy, and stop invading Israel.

    "Palestinians are a defenseless people that are daily oppressed and humiliated."

    Only a neo-nazi would believe this lie. The fact is that the Palestinian government is the true aggressor. They and their allies forced the occupation by their attacks on Israel. Israel would have ended the occupation many years ago if the attackers would have surrendered.

    The Palestinians would have been wise to follow the example of Japan in WW2. Like the Palestinians vs Israelis, the Japanese engaged in outrageous unprovoked attacks on the U.S. This forced the US to retaliate. This resulted in the occupation of Japan (like the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza).

    The Japanese were smart enough to surrender, and the US eventually left. If they had insisted in keeping their war going, likely the US would still be controlling the country. The Palestinians, with their continued attacks, are only keeping the occupation going.

    They could also learn from Egpyt. Under the rabid imperialist dictator Nassir, Egpyt attacked Israel. This forced Israel to take the Sinai as a buffer zone. Sadat took the reasonable course and said "no, we don't want to exterminate you." Egypt got the Sinai back.

    Palestinians have lost much by insisting on an aggressive, imperialistic, and genocidal policy. It would be really stupid of Israel to actually turn over land to a government dedicated to exterminating it like this.

    1. Re:Heil Hitler, you nazi! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      He didn't call you a Jew, he called you an Israeli, so get off your high horse.

      Additionally, Israel is as much to blame as anybody else for the situation there. For example, I don't see the PLO bulldozing American civilians.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:Heil Hitler, you nazi! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1, Insightful
      You're still missing the damn point. His post was about Israelis and the Israeli state and their actions. You're equating criticism of Israel with anti-semitism, which is freaking ridiculous.

      Go back. READ THE POST. PAY ATTENTION. THERE WILL BE A TEST LATER

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    3. Re:Heil Hitler, you nazi! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rachel Corrie chose to side with Palestinian
      murderers so I feel nothing for her death.
      Good riddance, actually.

    4. Re:Heil Hitler, you nazi! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      ...I get it now. You're not a Jew, just a dick.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    5. Re:Heil Hitler, you nazi! by ThirdEyeofShiva · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey Coward! Here's a thought! How about the rest of the world just seal you poor, undeserving patriots into your Diety granted lands to prevent any incursion from non-similiar peoples. What a load of crap you're spewing. Let's hear your fabulous explanation of why the early Romans wanted to shit down your necks? How about the Babylonians or the Mesopatamians? OOooh! why not just say why everyother culture to interact with yours has decided to get rid of you or enslave you! Maybe your pissing off someone's god, no that can't be right, you have the only TRUE god, guess that's who's pissed.

      Maybe you you could pretend you're just human and fucking pissing people off! I'd prefer to stay in my country and have you stay in your! Oh sorry, you don't really have a country, just the latest wheel-n-steal piece of shit real estate.

      And as for Japan, they encountered a superior military force, not a superior culture. How strange that you didn't quote the experiences of the American Indian as your underdog. How silly of me, that genocide was white washed with Manifest Destiny, an oddly resonant premise with Israels'. Guess those early Judeo-Christians learned from the best.

      You are the very kind of person that the average guy thinks of when the word Jewish is used. You probably think the same of me and anti-semite. But I don't hate you for a religious view. I hate you, personally! for pretending you are civilized and righteous.
      Damn barbarian xenophobes.

      --
      Just because I'm not real, doesn't mean I don't exist.
    6. Re:Heil Hitler, you nazi! by eldude · · Score: 1

      damn if i ever read so much crap in one go.

    7. Re:Heil Hitler, you nazi! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Palestinians have lost much by insisting on
      > an aggressive, imperialistic, and genocidal policy.

      LOL! If you compare the size of Palestine with the size of any other country, how can you then say that it is imperialistic? It's so small it doesn't even fit on my world map. There aren't enough Palestinians to occupy a city, let alone a full country [and at the rate israel is killing Palestinians these days, I'd say in 10 years there aren't enough Palestinians to occupy a single street].

      Seriously, you're delusional. Get off your crack before you say something stupid again. [With your views, I assume you think Kuwait actually invaded Iraq ten years ago]

    8. Re:Heil Hitler, you nazi! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay. So you side with Israeli murderers?

      That's disturbing.

    9. Re:Heil Hitler, you nazi! by WombatControl · · Score: 1

      Let's see, Hamas blew up an American student at a Tel Aviv university, as well as group of officials in Gaza that were there to find Palestinian Fulbright scholars, not to mention hundreds of Israel civilians including infants, women, and children.

      And don't respond that "Israel kills Palestinians too" - the difference being that Israel doesn't intentionally target civilians while Hamas, Hizb'allah, the al-Aqsa Martyr's Brigade, and the other Palestinian terrorist organizations do.

    10. Re:Heil Hitler, you nazi! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1
      Let's see, Hamas blew up an American student at a Tel Aviv university, as well as group of officials in Gaza that were there to find Palestinian Fulbright scholars, not to mention hundreds of Israel civilians including infants, women, and children.

      And don't respond that "Israel kills Palestinians too" - the difference being that Israel doesn't intentionally target civilians while Hamas, Hizb'allah, the al-Aqsa Martyr's Brigade, and the other Palestinian terrorist organizations do.

      I wont.

      I'm not defending anybody here. Like in many other places in the world, it's one dogmatic ideology fighting another. Fucking pointless and childish. The link I posted was to show evidence that you can dislike the state of Israel and its policies without being anti-semitic. I support none of the participants in this or any similar affair.

      This is the 21st century. Grow up and deal with it like adults.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  142. This is retarded by anotherone · · Score: 1

    I have a web hosting account with 5 gigs of space and I just set up Squirrelmail on it. I set it so that there's no limit on the size of my mailbox- I guess that means that I have the world's first 5 gig email account?

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
    1. Re:This is retarded by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      Well, I have a 2U server with 80 GB of disk space. Since I own it, I haven't imposed a quota on myself. Since it does e-mail, doesn't that mean I have an 80 GB inbox?

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  143. Re:Israel? by strictnein · · Score: 1

    hmm...

    well, I accept that
    and I apologize =)

    Well, I'm off to find an underling here at work to take out frustrations on!

  144. Re:Israel? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    He got all the way up to +4, insightful and informative, until just now he got an overrated.

    Just +3.

    Anyone who acts like either the Israelis or the Palestinians are completely innocent or completely guilty are lying.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  145. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Anyone who acts like either the Israelis or the Palestinians are completely innocent or completely guilty are lying.

    Never attribute to malice what can be blamed on stupidity. or some such quote.

  146. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow - Zionists sure made a quick effort to mod this out of existence!

  147. Die Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "(No offense, they're living in a warzone, that's bound to readjust priorities.) Yeah, one of their own making"

    We all know that if someone says "Die, Jew!" it is the duty of the Jew to do nothing but grab a shovel and ask where to dig his own grave.

  148. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    > Please, quit trying to say everyone who doesn't agree with you(Israel) is anti-semetic

    Kind of like everyone who disagrees with Bush is unpatriotic at best, a terrorist at worst.

    Someone help me out here, this seems like False Dilemma, either you agree or you are [anti-semite, unpatriotic, etc], though there are many 3rd choices.
    But it also fits Prejudicial Language pretty closely.
    What about Undistributed Middle, Some anti-semites disagree with Israeli policy, the Jews of Israel do not disagree, so if you disagree you must be anti-semite.

    Is there more than one way to look at this fallacy?

    Are we ever going to start drilling these into our children so they don't get led around by the nose so much?

  149. 1GB is an oversell by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    Not requiring an existing e-mail account, the domain name and the features are what define an e-mail service. I've seen people try to offer hosting packages with gobs of storage space and a tiny amount of alloted transfer. The alloted transfer is what makes a hosting solution worthwhile.

    You also can't have 1GB of storage without a reasonably sized attachment limit of at least several MB. 1GB storage isn't a big deal.

    Anybody who wants to, can offer that. Hotmail et al don't because they see it as more profitable not to. It's a business model not some breakthru in e-mail services. I've been offering e-mail service with unlimited storage and 15MB attachments for a couple years now. I just recently overhauled it to Indie-Mail.

    Ben

    1. Re:1GB is an oversell by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1
      Dumb question about Indie-Mail, which looks cool...

      I don't suppose it supports a non-standard SMTP port, does it? My !@#%!%# cable provider blocks port 25 for anti-virus purposes.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:1GB is an oversell by jbrw · · Score: 1

      fastmail.fm has some proxy services which will do SMTP on any port for people in your position.

      And fastmail rocks generally anyway.

  150. well can you read there site? by joannts · · Score: 1

    i would sign up for an account but i cant read aribic, and google does not translate it.

    1. Re:well can you read there site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I can.

  151. Re:Israel? by popo · · Score: 0

    Non-Western Media?

    Like whose? Certainly not the Europeans!

    Centuries of antisemitism haven't vanished overnight. European governments (and their largely state-funded newspapers) pursue antisemitic policies at almost every turn: from financial support to terrorist organizations, to wildly biased and inconsistent U.N. policies that single out Israel.

    Or do you mean the press in Arab countries where there is no freedom of the press, government-critical journalists are publicly executed, where there are no civil rights and where deviation from religious law can result in the imprisonment of one's whole family?

    No country in the world has close to the level of personal civil rights protections. No other country has per-capita the number of publications that the U.S. has. And *every* country in the world (particularly European countries) have a greater degree of government control over their media.

    Now what were you saying about non-western media you BBC watching zealot?

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  152. Re:Typically, it does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask any Palestinian if they're working to "Free their homeland" (which doesn't exist, they're Jordanians for f's sake. The word Palestinians used to mean Jews until the 50's.) or if they're working to exterminate all the Jews, and guess which one they'll answer most often?

  153. Re:Israel? by Triskele · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Truman should also never allowed Israel to be created

    Much as I normally jump on the opportunity to jump on America. This one ain't really the Yanks' fault. It's Britains. We owned Palestine. It all started with the Balfour declaration and went steadily downhill from there.

    Most of Israel's early leaders were on Britain's list of top terrorists. Things like the bombing of the King David hotel. Those evil bastards really did start the war of terror - and that was before the Holocaust. That just gave them the perfect excuse for sympathy later.

    Don't get me wrong I'm not anti-Jew (or other Semite) and I know many Israelis are as aghast at their nations doings as the rest of us. But Israel is an evil fucking state that deserves nothing less than the flames of hell.

    --

    --
    USA: home of the world's largest terrorist training camp.

  154. Heil Hitler, you nazi! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    "He didn't call you a Jew, he called you an Israeli, so get off your high horse"

    Antisemitism, hatred of Jews in general is the typical reason for hatred of Israelis. Don't use weasel-words. It is like saying "I don't have blacks. I hate sub-Saharan Africans".

    "Additionally, Israel is as much to blame as anybody else for the situation there"

    They are sometimes ham-handed, but are the victim here as sure as Poland was the victim in WW2.

    "For example, I don't see the PLO bulldozing American civilians."

    Interesting link. It happens to go to a page where someone committed suicide in the name of defending terrorism. At least she didn't have bombs attached to her in order to take out schoolchildren on the way out.

  155. 1GB of email space not that hard by Dwonis · · Score: 1
    I don't think it's all that difficult to offer 1GB of email space. Think about it: a huge portion of email traffic is spam. If some spam goes to 100000 users, you really only need one copy of the spam, plus a diff for different greetings, message headers, etc.

    Spam across multiple email accounts is very compressible...

  156. boring by presmike · · Score: 1

    i posted this 2 weeks ago but was rejected...

    --
    presmike
  157. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmmmm..., i am not german, but i live in germany right now.

    my experience is, that the people in germany are neither more nor less anti-semitic than ohter nationalities.

    and... sorry, but i am sure that you can find the most national socialists in the usa and nowhere else.

    and... its annoying that there are always people, who think, they have to abuse the holocaust for their own lasciviousness.

    gn8

  158. Re:Israel? by mishehu · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    At least I can post and reveal who I am. You must hide your anti-semitic anti-zionist views behind a shadow.

    Now what does 1 GB of webmail have to do with the supposed ethnic cleansing that Israel "perpetrates on a daily basis", to which you have provided no proof? Where are those Israeli death camps where the Palestinians are sent to be killed in showers and their bodies burned in ovens?

    Israel is a Jewish state, but it acknowledges that there are non-jews there and allows them to follow their own customs. Oh and heck, there are Arab Knesset members...

    I suggest you answer the white courtesy cluephone that is ringing in the /. lobby.

  159. BZZZZT WRONG by devphaeton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    30mb attachments? 1GB storage?

    NO NO NO NO!!! Email was not designed for this.

    furthermore, many email clients are not equipped to deal with attachments to the tune of 30mb. Most notable examples are Outhouse/Outhouse Express. Their attachment limit is somewhere near 1.7mb (for a 36.6Kbps dialup connection) and around 5.4mb for most broadband (most mailservers capped at 128Kbps).

    There is a hardcoded timeout interval in there that causes retrieval and sending of a message of that size to fail if it doesn't see EOF go by in a certain amount of time.

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
    1. Re:BZZZZT WRONG by ice-nine · · Score: 1

      Nah, this is bull. I've received attachments that are around 50 megs or so with Outlook (btw, clever re-spelling of Outlook to "outhouse", it makes you look really smart). I don't think Outlook or Outlook Express care what kind of connection you have, but I think some mail servers don't like large attachments. I haven't looked at the code (of course) and I don't know much about mail servers, but what you're saying makes no sense.

      --
      zing
    2. Re:BZZZZT WRONG by marcushnk · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 101% about the attatchment size thing.. e-mail was not designed for large file transfer..

      but large e-mail dbases.. that IS a good idea.. and one that fits with the idea of e-mail.

      --
      "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
  160. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Who gives a fuck? Godwin's 'Law' is bullshit.

    You know who else would say that? That's right, the Nazis!

  161. Please no spam by DonMaGiCJuan · · Score: 1

    I hope they have some good spam filters. 1 gig of spam doesnt sound too appealing

  162. ANTI-ISRAELI is not ANTI-SEMITISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Folks, Americans,

    Israel, although trying to become predominantly Jewish, is not the same as saying Jewish or Jew or Semite.

    When I say or somebody says, I totally disagree with Sharon and Israel's policy of trying to kill, take away the rights of and steal the land of the Palestinians doesn't have one iota of a correlation to me having a dislike for the millions of Jews who do not live in Israel or who are not Israeli.

    Just because you are Jewish doesn't mean you were born in Israel or that you are of Israeli nationality or that someway you are connected to that nation's policy.

    Although Israel is trying to recruit Jews of the world to move to or affliliate themselves with Israel, Israel and Jewish are two different things.

    Hating Jews for being Jews is ANTI-SEMITIC (and is wrong)

    Hating Israel or disliking Israel for being a War Monging Nation is just having an observant view of the reality of what is going on in Israel (and America's support for its policies).

    Israel has the best programmers in the world, they probably have the best computer-education system in the world and connecting that with their wealth of Military Background related to the US makes them one of the largest World Powers for over 20+ years.

    Do your research. Don't Hate Jews. Disagree with Governments of any religious affiliation that commit hateful wars, even America's own government when they go to war with their neighbors or a people for profit and not in defense but in total disregard of Treaties or of International Law.

    1. Re:ANTI-ISRAELI is not ANTI-SEMITISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by the way theirs a website called spymac that has been giving their users 1Gig Email Accounts for the past month or two.

      Do your research.

      Why post this info without researching, I don't understand.

      Officially taking this site off of my bookmark list.

      One less...awesome.

  163. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason I posted anonymously was because I don't have an account with Slashdot and don't care to. I rarely post.

    However, as far as proof of what I have said, why don't we look at the IDF logs which show how many Palestinians have been ejected from their homes, forced to sign papers saying they are ok with this ejection and given little or no compensation for this removal? Let's start with a few recent examples:

    http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/11/05/mi de ast/

    http://www.pchrgaza.org/files/PressR/English/199 9/ 14oct.htm

    http://www.miftah.org/PrinterF.cfm?DocId=3014

    http://www.bethlehemassoc.org/land_confiscation. ht m

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,98 99 03,00.html

    Yes, some of the above may seem biased sources but since most mainstream media sources refuse to print this stuff, someone has to do it. Let us also not forget that the mayor of Jerusalem has said on numerous occasions that it is Israeli policy to make Jerusalem a completely jewish city.

    I note that as usual when someone says anything critical of Israel they are instantly labeled as anti-semitic or anti-zionist, regardless if the truth is told. How convenient.

    I also never said that Israel had death camps. I merely said that it perpetrates ethnic cleansing on a daily basis. Let's not forget the wonderful Absentee Land Law of 1950 which made the statement that any person not on their land as of November 19, 1947(?) would be considered to be absent. The land would be held by a custodian.

    In 1953 a new law was passed which said that any land held by the custodian would revert to the state. Voila! Instant land grab since the arabs who lived on the lands were run off during the preceding years, particularly during 1948 when Israel was created, and never allowed to return to claim their land even though the 1950 law said that a person had a right to do so.

    No, the arabs did not leave on their own accord as the Isreali government wants people to leave. The people of the various villages were systematically run off their lands. We know this because:

    a) contrary to Israeli government claims, no radio message was ever given for the arabs to leave their homes. Not even the BBC, which monitored all radio traffic for the Middle East during that time has ever found any shred to support this claim.

    b) Various Israeli leaders, including Shimon Peres in his book, state that David Ben Gurion ordered the removal of arab villages. Ben Gurion had to convince Peres it was perfectly acceptable to do so.

    c) Benny Morris has documented evidence of the verbal orders to run the arabs off lands that the Israeli leaders wanted. In fact, Morris states in an interview with Haaretz that he felt Ben Gurion didn't go far enough with the expulsions:

    http://list.haifa.ac.il/pipermail/alef/2004-Janu ar y/003908.html

    Now, while I may post anonymously what I say is truthful. I'm not using anonymity to hide.

    Maybe when Israel admits to the crimes it has committed, and continues to commit, maybe then we'll talk.

  164. wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spymac.com has offered free 1gig for weeks now

  165. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The BBC is one of the (if not THE) most respected news organisations in the world. Just because it's funded by the licence-paying British public, does not mean it's controlled by the government.

    Sure they make mistakes (the people that run it are only human) but it puts crap like Fox News, Al-Jazeera and NTV to shame...

  166. I need more space! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else find 1GB of mail an extremely limiting amount? Most days I get more mail than that. So where does someone go to get a 1TB of mail space? I'm working on moving most my mail off my current mail host to my own server but I'm running into the problem that it seems my broadband provider blocks the incoming smtp port.

    Just remember boys and girls.. joining every mailing list you see is baaaaad. I can grep for solutions to problems with most opensource projects though.. as opposed to Googling for the same solution. ;)

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  167. Re:Typically, it does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some say tomAto, some say tomato. Either way seems fine to me.

  168. Re:Typically, it does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So those Palestinians who have been living in Bethelhem and Jerusalem, with family roots dating back over 2000 years, are...Jordanians? Quit your FUD, it helps nobody

  169. Not the first either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This company has been offering 1GB of email for a while.

    http://www.sentinare.com/index.php

  170. Walla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walla is starting a 1GB E-Mail service. Really?

    (Walla is arabic for "Really?")

  171. Re:Israel? by popo · · Score: 1


    That's true. BBC puts Fox News, Al Jazeera and NTV to shame. You'll get no argument from me. I didn't say *all* western press was good press. I said we have the free-est press in the world. And we have the most publications (per capita) in the world.

    Name another source of TV news in Great Britain. Sadly the entire country was taken for a ride in the BBC scandal and the sole reason was that Britain has very little alternative press. Per capita Britain has very little news variety.

    This would be ok if the BBC was balanced journalism. But its not. It panders to government pressures (hence the recent scandal) and takes a consistently pro-corporate line in its economic reporting, a consistenly pro-palestinian line in its middle east reporting, and is consistently *extremely* conservative on domestic (UK)reporting.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  172. Re:Turkey SPAM (R) probably not kosher by billstewart · · Score: 1
    It's only kosher if the turkeys are killed in a rabinically correct manner and the kitchens and canning factory are all kept clean under the inspection of a kosher-certifying rabbi. It's unlikely that the kill them kosherly, and it's highly unlikely that a company that's canning pork products would set up a separate factory just for kashrut.

    And it'd still be Spam...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  173. Re:Typically, it does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you talking about that aggression when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians lost their home and were force to live outside of their country? and those who were allowed to stay became citizens of a country with a religion motivated constitution?

    what was it that the last Israeli austronaut said before taking off on Columbia? "As an Israeli I am doing it for all Jews at home and abroad?". What about the non-Jewish Israelis? Talk about being sidelined and casted into second-class citizenship - since day one.

  174. Re:Typically, it does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, they are Jordanians, or other arabs. They are not a Palestinian people whose homeland is "Palestine". This is a product of media in the last 50 years.

  175. 1GB = $2 if you fill it. Advertising pays by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative
    Sergei or Larry said that 1GB costs them $2, and that sounds about right - the cost of disk drives is approaching $0.50 / GB, and you need some duplication for reliability and some computers to drive the disks, and amortize some operations cost, so you could probably do $2 in quantity. That's not $2/month, it's just $2.

    And that's if you fill the space - while some people can do that overnight (:-), it'll take a while before their average user receives enough email to get close to that much, and the cost of disk capacity is still on a deep dive, so by the time the average user fills their 1GB, it'll cost $1 or $0.50 instead of $2.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  176. IMO the 1 GB of storage isn't as important... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think the more important aspect is the way the emails are treated by google, i.e. organizing emails by conversations. That's a really cool way of organizing emails, and I'd like to see it in action.

    Not to mention it will be alongside the search engine I use almost exclusively.

  177. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're right, they do..

  178. Re:Israel? by Hans+und+Franz · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    This is accurate and appropriate:
    I'm German, so I feel qualified to answer this comment. Given the choice between an Israeli webmailer and Google, I'd choose Google.

    Without taking into account features, performance, etc. etc. he picks Google based on the fact that the other one is from Israel. This is accurate?

    Do you not understand the meaning of the word accurate? He said that he feels qualified to answer this comment, and he most probably does. He also said that he would choose Google over an Israeli company, and that too is probably true. Therefore, his statement is accurate. You should look it up in a dictionary.

    It's appropriate, too, because he wanted to say why a German might not want to go with an Israeli service for reasons other than Nazism. So there you have it. Accurate, and appropriate.
  179. They're more scared of Google by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Realistically, the US government is much more scared of Google than they are of Palestinians or other Israelis. As long as people in the Middle East keep fighting each other, there's a justification for a Military-Industrial Complex to tell us that they're protecting us from EEEVILLLL terrorists who might attack our Saudi oil.

    But Google means that if anybody puts information out on the net, anybody else can find it, and collect it, and analyze it, and publish it. The Government wants to be able to find out everything about _us_, but they don't want us finding out everything about them, or about the people they're telling us not to like, or about the people they're telling us we should like.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  180. I agree with you: it's not anti-semitism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arabic and Hebrew are both semitic languages.
    Semitism is closely linked to the races residing/resided in the middle east. (it's more complicated than that)

    So please stop spreading the zionist propaganda.

    It's not Anti-Semitism.

    You can call it Anti-Zionism. But since zionism is not a race, but rather a facist set of beliefs, it does not bode well for zionists to say oh PLEASE STOP THE ANTI-ZIONISM. You'll never hear them say that.
    These are the same people that claim that Palestine was a barren land when they first got there.
    The same people who say that they have a religious right to land, land that is not theirs.
    The same people that believe that they can come back after 2000 years and claim land, simply because "this was their land 2000 years ago".
    Maybe the romans should assimilate and retake middle earth?

    If someone came and took your home from you, killed your ancestors, your children, and uprooted your trees...
    I'm pretty sure you'd strap a belt to your chest.
    That doesn't make it right.
    But we always measure right and wrong from the comforts of our protected and secure lives.

    That's something to think about.

    All I can say for sure, is that for intelligent people, the cream of the crop, pearson graduates, etc., we still fall for propaganda.
    The best defence is questioning the 'truth', and seeking the objective truth (NOT Foxnews or CNN).

    whatever

  181. don't worry, we're safe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're worried about the US, don't be, because they think '.il' means Illinois.

  182. Yalla, stop showing off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Yalla is Arabic for "come on")

  183. Re:Israel? by Hans+und+Franz · · Score: 0, Troll
    when every Israeli Prime Minister says the goal is to have Israel be a jewish only state, that's ok.

    Of course it's okay! Why shouldn't it be okay? Israel is their land, and they can do with it as they please. They're surrounded by people who want to eradicate them, who will even blow themselves up just to kill a few of the hated Jews, so why should they be forced to include Arabs or Palestinians in their country? Granted, Gaza is arguably Palestinian, so I think Israel should just let it go and become its own country, and keep the troublesome Palestinians out of Israel for good. Jews only. What's wrong with that? I'm not a Jew, and I don't see anything wrong with them having their own land...

    Seriously, there is nothing wrong with ethnic cleansing if you aren't killing people. It can be necessary to preserve a culture from foreign hordes. The Palestinians, despite (or because of) poverty, still manage to outreproduce the Israelis. If they let them into Israel proper, soon they'll be the majority race there - just like with the Chinese immigrants in Canada, or the Muslim immigrants in France. They're a human tidal wave of people crashing over those who rightfully belong there. Trying to stop it is not wrong.
  184. Available to businesses? by Spruce28 · · Score: 1

    How long before this is offered to businesses as an alternative to hosting your own mail? A google logo in every e-mail, or better yet, an IT department that can keyword search every employee's e-mail at once. Who wants to know who said what about who? Scary.

  185. my post was a joke by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


    I was joking. They would hopefully delete spam rather than store pointers to it.
  186. Linux Box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wouldn't the worlds first 1GB webmail be whomever set up imp for themselves on a hard drive larger than 1GB?

    Just wondering.

    And Spymac already has 1GB email (redundant)

  187. Already works on slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it hasn't been used in a while, but there used to be a fully managed xiafs(don't ask) partition that actually ran via a gateway (coded in perl) that broke up arbitrary data into 32k chunks, hashed them, encrypted them, posted those chunks as comments in stories about to be archived and indexed the whole mess to be displayed as a coherent file structure with pathetic high latentcy.

    You could shell in, read the file table (cached) and request files through the normal means. the server would retrieve the comments, assemble them and send them on the way.

    The first rev was cruddy- you had to wait on the file to be totally asembled before transfer would commence. somewhere along the line, someone spruced it up to pull chunks in sequence and start streaming the file while waiting on slashdot (slashdot didn't always used to be a lightning quick monster, like it is today).

    The point wasn't to see if this could be done, nor to push the limits of middleware or whatever. this was used simply to archive around 4 Gb's of pr0n for the shared delight of a handful of IRC users.

    1. Re:Already works on slashdot. by Professr3 · · Score: 1

      Now this interests me... what was done about corrupt data (ie. moderators deleting the posts)? I would like to try this perhaps :D

  188. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The big three TV news channels in the UK are from the BBC, Sky and ITN. In addition, we can receive CNN, CNBC, Bloomberg, EuroNews, CCTV-9 (China's English News Channel), Fox News, Al-Jazzera, DW-TV (German/English), Star News (Indian) and probably more. Britain is also the home of Reuters.

    We have a vast array of national newspapers from all view points. The Guardian, The Times, The Telegraph, Daily Mail, etc...

    The "scandal" involving the BBC, Kelly and Gilligan was vastly blown out of proportion. The British public still respect the BBC vastly more than Tony Blair's government, and the Inquiry was called a whitewash by many in the media. The recent "scandal" was caused because the BBC stood its ground against the government and not because it pandered to its needs.

    Sure certain BBC articles have slight non-neutral POVs but that applies across the board to all news companies. Humans write articles!

    And, the BBC just isn't what you see at news.bbc.co.uk. Look around the web site, there are vast news resources from many countries in many languages. NO other news organisation is quite so vast in terms of what it provides.

    IMHO, the UK has some excellent news organisations from all viewpoints.

  189. Re:Israel? by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    Your comparing Israel fighting a bunch of terrorists who hide in a country that supports them to Hitler? The same terrorists that strap bombs to their bodies to blow up weddings, restaurants, etc? Oh wait your posting anonymously. -Avi

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  190. Re:Israel? by eldude · · Score: 1

    cheer up though, the israelis have a looong way to go to even scratch the skill in atrocity the enlightened europeans practiced at home and abroad.

  191. Slashdot is a joke by bonch · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When's the last time you had the feeling that any of the editors listened to any of the needs/concerns of their readers?

    Outright falsehoods often get posted, with no corrections. But it doensn't matter because, despite professing to be a news site, somehow it's "not really" because it's Taco's hobby site. But why call it a tech news site? Isn't that ignoring the fact that a very, very large chunk of geek population TREATS this site like hard news? A lot of people form their worldviews because of the headlines here, which is the cause for a lot of silly opinions, anti-"M$" lies, etc.

    1. Re:Slashdot is a joke by DebianRcksLindowsLie · · Score: 1

      The slashmind mentality works and works well. Maybe there ought to be some way that members can VOTE on what stories get posted. That way stories themselves can get karma. Slashdot's not broken, it just needs some updating. Dupes and mistakes are part of the history.

      And besides, we don't all read it the first time!

    2. Re:Slashdot is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe there ought to be some way that members can VOTE on what stories get posted.

      What a concept!

  192. 1GB attachments... by skermit · · Score: 1

    http://www.yousendit.com/ has 1gb attachments already, and a lot of my fellow Google Researchers use it for sending files between each other.

    --
    -Christopher Wu
    http://www.christopherwu.net/
  193. Why is that... by shlaf · · Score: 1

    any news mentioning the word "Israel" is inevitably followed by a boringly long chain of pro-Arab propaganda posts? Come on, could you guys concentrate on the topic for God's (or shall I say Allah's) sake?

  194. Hear hear by apankrat · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Search feature sounds pretty much like what M2 client has:

    Search your M2 e-mails for almost anything. A search "sticks" and becomes an access point, so that you can easily refer to it in the future.

    I realize that M2 is not free and not web-based, but still it makes Gmail's searching much less of a novelty than someone ;) may want it to appear.

    The point is that GMail is unique due to the combination of features it has to offer, which among other things include kick-ass UI, search and storage space.

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
  195. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the same retoric that Nazis used to justify the elimination of Gypsies, the mentally retard, the Jews, etc. It was not right in Germany and it still ain't right in Isreal.

  196. Re:Israel? by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 1

    Aquiring the disk space is easy. The hard part is paying for the bandwidth to make that space useful.

  197. Re:Israel? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nah. They're liars. Anyone who would say that either side is "the true aggressor" gave up reality for rhetoric a long time ago.

    Whether they're lying because they think it's justified for their cause, or just because they're trolling is a separate matter.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  198. That would require by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    someone connecting through the proxy. And that proxy having the private key.

    The private key is never given out so yes, this does prevent man in the middle attacks. You can't use the key given to clients to decrypt the data stream.

    Ben

    1. Re:That would require by torinth · · Score: 1

      Please pick up Applied Cryptography or some resource other than your intuition. Security is a complicated business, and you should take heed of the original replier's warning.

      1) Proxies are not always recognized as such. DNS hijacking and malicious routing both allow for proxies that the user wouldn't even know about.

      2) A private key doesn't mean squat with a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. The way it works is that the MITM creates a certificate that presents himself to the Client as you. The Client thinks he's connecting directly to you and initiates an encrypted session by exchanging a new session key (SA). This session key encrypts the data between the Client and the MITM. Meanwhile, the MITM begins a new session with you, presenting himself as the Client. You, thinking you're connected directly with the Client, exchanges a session key (SB) with the MITM. This session key encrypts the data between the MITM and you. At this point, the MITM simply decrypts each packet from the client using SA, reads it, then sends it to you using SB. And of course, the same principle works in reverse. Neither you nor the client have any way to distinguish MITM's presence from any other sort of packet delay, amd you have absolutely no privacy or security.

      A CA allows the client to verify through a second channel that he is in fact talking directly to you and not some MITM. Different levels of CA's authentication provide different levels of reassurance. A low-grade certificate from Thawte or another provider should cost you less than $100 and will put a significant (though still not foolproof) hurdle in the way. Just get one already.

    2. Re:That would require by Astastrafal · · Score: 1
      A low-grade certificate from Thawte or another provider should cost you less than $100 and will put a significant (though still not foolproof) hurdle in the way. Just get one already.


      You can a certificate at much cheaper than $100. Instantssl.com offers certs at $49 per year. Its browser coverage (i.e. how many browsers are distributed with its public key) is also good at a reported 99.3%. I once found another certificate provider at $39/year (but with lower browser coverage) but I forgot the address. Do a search and you'll probably find it. Personally I think the price is well worth it for the added security and peace of mind that it provides, but since icarusindie.com is providing a free service you understandably might not want to spend too much on it. BTW how are you paying for that webmail thing? Do you plan to stick around or will you get bored and shut down the thing after some time?
  199. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go suck on some Zyklon-B you filthy kike

  200. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least Germany admitted it wronged people. The same can't be said for Israel which perpetrates ethnic cleansing on a daily basis and refuses to acknowledge it's doing anything wrong.

    It's wrong to defend one's self against constant terrorist attacks by those that want your complete destruction? Name one instance of the 'ethnic cleansing' that you allege Israle perpetrates daily. Israel may have forced people out when it was established but it's not forcing anyone else anywhere nor are they systematically killing anyone. I can understand why ill informed people and lazy thinkers buy into the Palestinian propaganda about Israeli atrocities. They're very clever at it and who doesn't support the 'underdog'? I was in Germany two weeks ago and while everyone I met was very sheepish and apologetic about WWII, their media was different. I saw many allegations of Israeli atrocities on tv without questioning any of the actual facts. Clips of Palestinian kids throwing rocks are intercut with clips of Israeli tanks and soldiers firing big guns. Several Germans I talked at the bar said that Israel was no better than the Nazis for systematically shooting 'civilians' and kids. The Germans and Europeans in general have been particularly egregious in this because it palliates their guilt over the Holocoust. E.g. Jews are just as bad as the Nazis and deserve whatever they get. Israel has never deliberately targeted civilians which is not to say that they never kill civilians. However, even the Geneva Conventions recognizes that civilians casualties are allowed if the force used against legitimat targets is proportional to the threat or value of the target. Israel completely defeated Egypt, Jordan and Syria in 6 days; if Israel really didn't care about civilian casualties or were even half as monstrous as terrorist apologists accused them of being, there would be a lot more dead Palestinians.

    It was bad when Hitler wanted to make Germany a 'pure' state but when every Israeli Prime Minister says the goal is to have Israel be a jewish only state, that's ok.

    The ironic thing is that the Palestinians who live in Israel have the most rights and freedoms of any Muslims in the Middle East. So for you to equate Hitler's genocidal quest for a 'pure' state with Israel's desire to have a state with a Jewish identity, especially after the Holocoust, either makes you an idiot or an anti-semite or both.

  201. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yawn. All the standard talking points of AIPAC. The lies won't cut it anymore, Zionist.

  202. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the Israeli military are terrorists to many Palestinians. Numerous times have Israeli attempts to eliminate Palestinian terrorists resulted in the deaths of innocent bystanders.

    An eye for an eye makes the entire world blind. In the words of Rodney King, "Can't we all just get along?"

  203. SO WHAT? I get over 2 GIG for free now. by DigitalHaze · · Score: 1

    I don't get how 1 gig of Google and others' E-mail is supposed to be so Earth-shattering when sites like www.skizzle.com give you virtually unlimited space for free. I have just over 2 gig of files in my Skizzle briefcase (organized as files, not E-mail)... and I've had the account for a couple of years now. You can even do file sharing clubs with no known storage limits. You'll really impress me when you can let me mail a burned CD to a service and they place them in my folders for me.

  204. From an Israeli by Angry+Black+Man · · Score: 1

    when every Israeli Prime Minister says the goal is to have Israel be a jewish only

    Yeah, that would be atrocious if any prime minister ever said that. No prome minister of Israel ever said the goal of Israel is to be "jewish only." In factt, israel has given Arabs, including Muslim Arabs, Christian Arabs, and non-religious Arabs, numerous rights including citizenship and the right to vote. Yemenites have an extremely good relationship with the Israeli government and are crucial in their military intelligence

    Israel is a state built on cooperation. The problem is there are extremists on both sides that dont want to cooperate. My grandfather and grandmother fought for the independence of Israel (after fleeing from Nazi Europe). My father fought in the six day war, the yom kippur war, and the war of attrition. Despite this, we are by no means patriotic or die hard Israel. We hate the current Israeli government jsut as much as many college liberals. The problem is, Israel is a coalition government where the extremists can either make or break a government. The real war in Israel is between religious jews (who make up less than 5%) and secular jews (who make up the rest). Secular jews are, generally, pro-peace and, inherently, anti-strong religious dogma. Its the religious taht refuse to compromise.

    Its not like America where there is a reform, traditional class. Still, though, Israel does not aim to cleanse itself of all Arabs as Hitler did with Jews. Israel has given Arabs better rights than most ARAB coutnries, including Jordan (read: Black September when PLO tried to execute a coup on King Hussein), Syria (who just sends them all to lebanon or to fight israel, mainly cause they dont want refugees in Syria), Egypt (Nassir oppressed palestinians more than any israeli prime minister ever did), etc.

    This does not jsutify the ongoing war. Like I said, most secular jews want peace in some form or another. Its the damn extremists (but then again, it always is). I think that winning the six day war was teh worst thing that ever happened to Israel, since its the root of most of the problems today. Its what turned Israel from defender to occupier.

    --
    the byproduct of years of oppression by the white man
    1. Re:From an Israeli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am very glad to read your comments. I, like most rational people, know that not the whole of Israel is to blame for the policies of the country but rather, as you have so eloquently stated, the extremists are the problem. Just as the extremists on the Palestinian side are also to blame. One can be against the policies of a country but not the country itself.

      In regards to my comment about Prime Ministers saying that Israel was for jews only, the following article has a comment, not from the Prime Minister, but from the Communications Minister:

      http://www.eto.home.att.net/jewsonly.html

      While the measure was eventually defeated the comment makes my point.

      A more compelling comment was made by Yitzhak Rabin in 1995 in comments made to the press on April 14:

      he reiterated his ideological commitment to the principle that only the Jews "have the right over the entire Land of Israel".

      http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/7891 /s hahak154.html
      (second paragraph in)

      Regardless, it is alwasy refreshing to hear voices such as yours in any discussion. People who recognize that the reason for a conflict comes from those who have an interest in continuing the conflict will always have a place in a discussion.

    2. Re:From an Israeli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It *is* very refreshing to read your comments.

      It's frustrating to be called "anti-semetic" when one is anti-Zionist and anti-apartheid.

      So what can we do about the mistaken picture of the conflict in the US public consciousness and media?

      Because, the extremists in Israel could not carry out their policies - they couldn't do a damn thing - if the US withheld its support. It's unbelieveable the amount of money given to Israel from the US taxpayer (both in direct cash and military support.) It's a huge portion of the entire US foreign aid every year.

      By the way, about the 'better rights for Arabs than arab countries', 1. it's still not good enough - how would you like equivalent rights for Jews in America...? Think about that!

      And, 2. Might some Arab countries not be so extremist (read: anti-American) were it not for US support for Israeli oppression? Iran comes to mind, as does our support for the corrupt, awful Saudi regime... would we need that regime, were we not so hated?

      Sorry if I sound bitter, but I'm pissed that my country has been hijacked to support this extremist 5% of the population you mention.

    3. Re:From an Israeli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "It's frustrating to be called "anti-semetic" when one [hates Israelis] and anti-apartheid."

      For one who is anti-apartheid, you sure are inconsistent. The Palestinians are the worst in this regard: one of their demands for their state is to utterly cleanse Jews (native Jews, not just settlers) from their lands.

      "Might some Arab countries not be so extremist (read: anti-American) were it not for US support for Israeli oppression?"

      There is no Israeli oppression. The reason for Arab hatred of America goes back to the Arab hatred of Jews for hundreds of years. America has stood in the way of Arab plans for extermination, so the Arabs hate us.

      "It's unbelieveable the amount of money given to Israel from the US taxpayer (both in direct cash and military support.) It's a huge portion of the entire US foreign aid every year."

      It is one of the best things about foreign policy: creating a beacon of justice in the Middle East. Israel, the only country in the area where Arabs have full democratic rights. Israel, which has more rights for Muslims than any Muslim country.

      "So what can we do about the mistaken picture of the conflict in the US public consciousness and media?"

      The situation is that the US public is rather informed about the issues, and lacks your mad-dog foam-at-the-mouth hatred of Jews. Few believe your lies.

  205. how about these people? by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

    they offer a free 1 gig email account with pop3

    http://www.spymac.com/network.php?p=tour

  206. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see. A foreign government has run me off my land, prevents my relatives from going back to the homes they were thrown out of by that same government, gives the confiscated land to its people, makes laws which prevent me from buying land or moving into a house wherever I want, puts my people (not me personally) in camps, publicly states that its goal is to create 'facts on the ground' to prevent the original inhabitants from returning, stands by and does nothing as its citizens destroy orchards and farms that the people there have had for decades, takes water which is on someone elses land and gives it to its own people, randomly imprisons people without any charges or suspicions of wrongdoing for months or years, I guess I'll just sit back and take it.

    Yes, the analogy to Hitler is perfectly acceptable since the policies that Hitler used against not only jews but homosexuals and political opponents are the exact same policies that Israel is now using against the Palestinians.

    And so what if I post anonymously. So far no one has refuted anything I've said. All that has been done is to attack the messenger rather than the message. Typical when the truth can't be refuted.

    Oh, one other thing. The word is you're.

  207. Kosher isn't so simple by denjin · · Score: 1

    As another poster replied...

    If an animal isn't killed in the right way or there isn't proper rabbinical supervision, it won't be considered kosher. I know, as I keep kosher and I never even see kosher turkey products in the store, I have to go to a kosher grocery downtown to get it...

    But as you probably implied, pork can't be kosher, no matter what. :)

  208. Re:Israel? by dinojemr · · Score: 1

    Numerous times have Israeli attempts to eliminate Palestinian terrorists resulted in the deaths of innocent bystanders.

    Perhaps those innocent bystanders would not have died if they were not standing in front of Israel's targets.

    1. Use civilians as shields when the army comes
    2. ?????
    3. Profit! (by world's opinion when the enemy kills the bystanders)

  209. Can there servers even handle 1 gig of e-mail?!?! by inertialmatrix · · Score: 1

    This is the first time that I have ever seen a site get /.ed after there url was posted in the _COMMENTS_ of a slashdot post. shessh...

    Seriously though, I have been a member of spymac for the last year or so; and in that time there website has just gotten slower, and slower. It's just another php behemoth.. just waiting for a denial of service attack. And sadly they have focused more, and more on making a buck. They sell hats, laptop bags, premium ad free accounts, hosting, weblogs, auctions, idisk storage, and advertising.

    I don't know, I'm not against them turning a profit... but still. It went from being a nice medium sized message board/image gallery that was simple, and fast - to this slow website that offers a ton of services-slowly.

    And there e-mail? OMG, I tried sending out 4 different attachments that were each about 1500KB each. It took forever!!, and receiving large files takes even longer. It is obvious they don't have the capacity.

  210. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent admits he's served in the Israeli army. Anything he says should be taken with a grain of kosher salt.

  211. AOL has been doing this for years.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever notice in the AOL ads that they advertise "Unlimited Email & Internet"? Well, it's true, AOL users have NO STORAGE LIMIT.

    So, in theory, you could transfer DVD ISOs of Linux across AOL mailboxes without difficulty. ...and AOL has been doing this for years!

    1. Re:AOL has been doing this for years.... by clickster · · Score: 1

      You couldn't transfer ISOs because they DO have an attachment limit. I know 3-4 years ago it was something like 16 MB between AOL/Compuserve accounts and just a few MB if it wasn't internal.

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become less powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  212. Yeah Right by blunte · · Score: 2, Informative

    What the German said was clearly NOT anti-semetic.

    And what McAddress said was clearly not funny.

    Naturally McAddress was modded +5 Funny. Moderation here is completely worthless.

    --
    .sigs are for post^Hers.
    1. Re:Yeah Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (Score:4, Informative)
      Moderation here is completely worthless.

      So, since moderation is worthless, and the post was moderated "informative", therefore the post must be uninformative. Which means that moderation must be valuable, and since the post was moderated "informative"....

      That's it. I'm leaving to look at pr0n. Goodbye, all.

  213. True, very true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arabs and Jews as well as others are all semitic.

    Arabic and Hebrew are both semitic languages.

    google it, you'll find out for yourself

  214. Re:Israel? by wpiman · · Score: 1

    They are trying real hard though....

    Nothing like ignoring history and repeating the mistakes of the past.

  215. Uhm, how can it beat them? by M3wThr33 · · Score: 1

    I just made a GMail account yesterday. I'm in the beta. It's kinda hard to beat them to the punch if they're already doing it.

  216. Do it yourself with a Google Appliance? by stevensweet · · Score: 1

    Has anyone tried offering a similar service with the Google Appliance? http://www.google.com/appliance/

  217. er, there -is- a difference by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
    Besides me allready being happy with my current spymac account (with 1 Gig storage : so they are defenitely not the first) : Gmail has the name : http://www.walla.co.il/ ... walla ? ... dot co ? ... what, dot il ?! er

    What's your hotmail account ?

    that and the fact i can't read their frontpage (hebrew, i think) : It's a worthless 'first' at it.

  218. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I laugh at you when your system is slow as shit because you implemented ide/sata raid system for 1 million users?

    Scsi and fiber channel is the only way to go and it is NOT cheap yet.

  219. A suggestion for the editors (marginally offtopic) by women · · Score: 1
    If an article is about a product or a service that has something to do with Israel, you don't have to mention it in the article. One only needs to look at this discussion at 0 nested to see that Slashdot is chock full of zealots, largely on one side. What this creates is a flood of offensive, off topic messages that suck up mod points used ammunition in a religious/nationalistic flame war. This is bad regardless of which side you're on for two reasons:
    1. Fewer mod points are in the system to use on relevant messages
    2. Racist messages get modded up past the +3 threshold and create lower the signal to noise ratio.
    --
    If you're a fan of women, add me to your friends list.
  220. Yeah, simplify MOSSAD's task by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, just give those MOSSAD bastards the keys to your appartment, while you're at it.

  221. Never have to delete? Right... by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

    Well, I probably am replying too late for anybody to care, but here goes anyway...

    What I don't understand is how all these people can claim that 1GB is enough space that you'll never have to delete your mail. For a comparison, the last time I looked, my boss's Outlook personal folder is approximately 1.2GB in size. That's in addition to her quota on the mail servers. (I don't know what that is as the exchange servers are administered by corporate.) I think mine is approximately 150MB and that's only about 3.5 months worth of email. Basically, I'll concede any day that 1GB is a lot of space, but it's certainly not enough for a lifetime.

    --

    If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  222. Re:Typically, it does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sad, you are a victim of false propaganda.

    Or, a knowing perpetrator of it.

    Read any unbiased history.

    But, you are a bigot, so it's hard to expect you'll be capable of being objective.

  223. Video emails by johkir · · Score: 1

    With respect to 1G email storage and 30Mg limits...
    Just as many family emails go out now with a picture or two, folks will soon want video email attachments. Not to mention the pr0n industry! This seems to be getting the hardware and software in place and allow for tweeking later.
    Maybe Peter Jackson will just email the dailies of King Kong, or the next movie, to himself and others in far flung countries, instead of carrying them around in his iPod.

    --
    These are some of the things molecules do...... given 4 billion years -Carl Sagan
  224. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Message is clearly fascist zionist propaganda.

  225. New Holocaust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terrorism isn't extermination.

    The bulldozing of people's homes and walling off of their farms is. This is the new holocaust, ironically perpetrated by the victims of the last one. Look at Israel's borders when it was created. Then look 30 years from then. Then look at it now. They are close to literally pushing the Palestinians into the ocean.

  226. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try reading the accounts in the Japanese (or, I haven't read it myself but would be interesting to know), Chinese-language press, say Taiwan's.

    You going to say that the Japanese press is burdened by anti-semitism too?

    It's a big world out there.

    And before you call somebody a zealot you might want to take a long look in the mirror.

  227. Palestinian Extermination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know its happening. Thanks to the Internet, control of the media no longer means control of reality. Google for Israel and see what I mean.

  228. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that's all going to weapons for exterminating Palestinians. This is private industry.

  229. Yes it does by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    You can also connect to SMTP through port 28 since my ISP also blocks port 25.

    I should probably post that info publically since it is a selling point for the service as most e-mail servers don't run on alternate ports.

    Ben

    1. Re:Yes it does by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1
      FYI - I actually got your service to work by using my ISP's outgoing SMTP server. Apparently they are no longer requiring their own domain as the return address, which I think they used to do.

      But thanks for the alternate method as well.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  230. Palestinian Extermination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know Palestinian extermination is happening. Thanks to the Internet, control of the media no longer means control of reality. Google for "Israel + bulldozers + wall" and see what I mean.

    We all know the Palestinians deserve it though. Anyone that disagrees is an anti-semite. You aren't an anti-semite are you?

    Anyone else think that it's ironic (would be funny if not for the genocide) that the victim of the last holocaust is perpetrating another one? And that the U.S. is funding it? I guess the last one is sad rather than ironic.

  231. I hate Israel, not Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate genocide, not jews.
    I hate theft of land, not jews.
    I hate massive injustice, not jews.
    I hate outragous human rights violations, not jews.

    If you want to link hating the state of Israel with being anti-semitic, then thats your problem.

  232. Re:Israel? by jrockway · · Score: 0

    The AC has a point. We need diversity in the Middle East. Arabs and Jews are the same race!!! Why can't they live together??

    They could have a pretty good society if they stopped murdering each other's women and children!

    --
    My other car is first.
  233. Fury by Proud+Israeli · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Wow... I didn't know a 1Gig mail tidbit could make a self-proclaimed geek community lash out with such blatant hatred.

    But since it's out there...

    I'll make it short,

    200 years ago, Jews are scattered throughout Europe, banned from all guilds, Jews are forced to practice trade and commerce.

    100 years ago, Jews are thriving, strangely enough relentless persecution follows, the sought after euphoric notion of coexistence diminishes. MY ancestors seek sanctuary.

    50 years ago, Jews have been slaughtered by the millions, NO MORE!

    MY forefathers built me a HOME, Israel.
    Putting aside the biblical records of Jewish settlements; legitimately occupying a 470 Kilometers strip of land (Size) is crucial to our survival and sovereignty.
    I am 23 years old, I've volunteered 4 years of my life to DEFEND my only HOME, just like my father, and my grandfather before him, have we not done so, Israel would have been bereft of its existence. (Israeli wars)
    I spent my first 2 years in the army learning how to dismantle and operate an assault rifle in a heartbeat, walk 50 miles packing 100 pounds of gear, and adhere to the strictest rules of ethical conduct. I spent the rest of my service operating indigenous strategic positioning and command systems (Westwood beware).

    I'd much rather have spent my best years partying in college...

    But I was left with no choice; we've learned our lesson, Jews must fend for themselves, unwillingly we have to relay a strong message to the world:

    You don't FUCK with Israel.

    Our survival depends on it. (Green=Foe)

  234. How about sharing DVD's by email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could even set up your system with all the requests being sent to you via coded port knocking.

    Of course it would be easily spoofable.

  235. Actually, it's not the features... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...it's the breathtaking amount of bandwidth and huge number of servers vs what appears to be one overloaded machine at the end of a glowing piece of barbed wire.

    It certainly defecates on hotmail from a substantial altitude.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Actually, it's not the features... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly defecates on hotmail from a substantial altitude.


      That is a beautiful sentence. Thank you.

  236. benefits of subscribing by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    To Fark or Slashdot? The answer is 'yes' for both.

    For Fark ('TotalFark'), you get access to all the submissions, not just the ones they decide to accept. What this means is you get access to a lotta boobies links before they get, well, farked.

    Same deal with Slashdot - stories are accessible before the general populace can see them, so you have a chance to check out a site before it gets pounded into oblivion. Plus you can choose not to see ads. And, even cooler for those like me, you can access ALL of your previous posts (I've got over 1600 posts going back years). One of these weekends when I'm feeling really bored, I intend to go back through them all and save the ones I wish I had saved in the first place. I crack myself up, you see. :)

    1. Re:benefits of subscribing by wpanderson · · Score: 1

      > Plus you can choose not to see ads.

      I can do that without subscribing - right-click the ads in Firefox and 'Block images from ...'.

      --
      neuro at well dot com (when I post, it's my opinions, no-one elses)
    2. Re:benefits of subscribing by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes you can, but then you're hurting Slashdot financially when you do that. Why would you want to hurt Slashdot? You're naughty.

    3. Re:benefits of subscribing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I rarely ever see them in Safari anyway!

  237. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, he means that as a German, Israeli security services and military have saved his citizens many, many times. And as a straightjacket model/German, that means he must hate them.

  238. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither of which Google use. They use zillions of cheap boxes; not some fancy expensive thingy you seem to be advocating.

  239. my mail is already searchable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether using Microsoft Entourage or Apple's mail.app, my mail is fully searchable.

    If that's google's new thing, then they don't anything.

  240. Re:Israel? by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

    I find it amazing that out of all the responses to this post, there was not one that said I was wrong, although there have been over 10 mod points used to knock me to zero. Is there a Zionist that can justify their views? Or are all of you going to passive/aggressive(ly) disagree by modding? No wonder diplomacy is done with bombs in Israel. You have no basis for your genocide other than Israeli greed. Please, make me understand your position. Give me the intellectual basis for my err. I have tried to understand - I really wanted to support Israel, I mean we give so much money to you guys and take so much shit because of our support for you, I really wanted to get behind the cause. I am obviously missing the point, because all of the research shows you are murdering bastards. Here, look at these stats:

    Israeli children dead = 106 | Palestinians children dead = 535 |||| 6322 Israelis dead | 25601 Palestinians dead

    This is what "God" wants? This is fair? This is fighting terrorism? This is true anti-semitism.

    PLEASE make me understand, if I am so wrong, please tell me why so I don't look like such an ass. My aim isn't to hurt, but to find truth and understanding - if I am wrong and you can show me why then I have learned something.

    --
    ymmv
  241. 1 GB NBD by aimew · · Score: 0

    I went to the site mentioned, followed link or two and found myself on Spymac, a cooperative effort by Apple and Disney, that I signed up on and immediately got a 1GB Mailbox +

    250 MB of space to upload pictures in the Spymac Gallery
    100 MB free space on Spymac Hosting with WebDAV access*
    Free iCal Hosting (both public and private)*
    Access to the Spymac Forums and Shoutbox
    Your very own Spymac Blog*
    Access to the Spymac Auctions
    The ability to create your very own personal Gallery and Forum

    So, what's the big deal about the Israeli's, who are two months away, or Google (when did they say?)? It's here right now.

    Oh, the account is accessible via POP/SMTP as well. Not too shabby so far.

    The site does need some tightening up, there are way too many errors going from page to page and its spell checker just errors out and you lose your mail. but hey, like I said, just use the pop/smtp and get around that for now.

    I'm telling everybody I know about this, who knows when they'll run out of space/bandwidth? (It already seemed sluggish.)

    --- Be careful when you do unto others as you'd have done unto yourself, their tastes may differ!

    --
    Keeper of the terrible karma ---
  242. 30 MB email attachments! by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

    Because we all open every attachment that arrives in our email, right? Have you heard of something calle d a virus?

    --
    -Rich
  243. You don't hate semites. You just hate Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "It's not Anti-Semitism"

    Whatever. It is clearly hatred of Jews.

    "But since zionism is not a race, but rather a facist set of beliefs"

    It is not "Facist". It is nothing more than the idea that Jewish people have a right to live free.

    "Maybe the romans should assimilate and retake middle earth?"

    It is by now quite clear you are living in fantasy land. Are you plotting the sequel to "The Return of the King"?

    "seeking the objective truth (NOT Foxnews or CNN)."

    Like www.natvan.com ?

  244. Hamas: cry for genocide, not justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Support, not the actions, but the cry for justice, and the desire to resist instead of lying down and going away

    Hamas openly calls out for the extermination of all Jews. "Lying down"? If the Palestinians had done this, there would be NO occupation. It is the unrelenting Palestinian aggression against Israel which has forced the aggression (just like Japan's attacks against the U.S. forced the U.S. to occupy Japan).

    "Most of Hamas' activity is in charity"

    Only in the perverted, savage, and bloodthirsty mind of the modern Palestinian is the gift of dismembermemt to a Jewish schoolchild "charitable".

  245. But it is not.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I'm not defending anybody here. Like in many other places in the world, it's one dogmatic ideology fighting another"

    The ideologies are clearly not the same. On one side (Israel), you have the ideology of "we want to be left to live in peace". On the Palestinian side, you have "we want to exterminate you and take over all your land". If this was WW2, Israel would be like Poland and the "Palestinian" government would be like the Nazis (never mind the coincidental goals of exterminating Jewish people).

    "The link I posted was to show evidence that you can dislike the state of Israel and its policies without being anti-semitic."

    You CAN'T. Typically, those who hate Israel hate it it because it is Jewish, or they have bought into lies told by neo-nazis.

  246. I speak Hebrew and signed up by lorcha · · Score: 1
    This 1GB service is not available yet. For fun, I signed up for their email anyway and got 6 megs for free. But I can get 120 megs for only 269 shekles a year (currently US$58.68)!!!!1111. (Sorry, the site is just really really enthusiastic.) :)

    Oh, wait. It's actually 288 sheks with the VAT. Can't forget that.

    Anyhow, it's hardly free and hardly 1GB!

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  247. Not like anyone is gonna read this, anyway by lorcha · · Score: 1

    So I don't care if I reply to myself. But I just reread the site and the 269 sheks includes tax. The 288 NIS figure was if you pay monthly for the whole year. Ahhh well.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  248. Re:1GB = $2 if you fill it. Advertising pays by fastdecade · · Score: 1

    it'll take a while before their average user receives enough email to get close to that much

    Not to mention compression. A huge amount of mail must be duplicated thanks to spam, group-mails, and copious forwarding of jokes and petitions.

  249. Re:Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's hard to feel sorry for someone who was willing to sacrfice her life to prevent the demolition of smuggling tunnels used to bring weapons to terrorists so they could better kill innocent cilivilians.

    Check the facts - from where she was situated, there was no way the bulldozer operator could see her.

    When these "peace" activists start protesting Palistinian terrorist attacks as much as they protest Israeli attempts to defend their country, there might be a slightly better chance for peace.

  250. 1 GB email is peanuts ! by rozz · · Score: 1

    during dotcom years http://www.crosswinds.net/ was offering UNLIMITED web space and email ... i never used it much because of continuous login&co problems, but i know people which had more than 1GB of data there.

    --
    "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  251. NMAP on Spymac results by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

    A coworker recently ran nmap on it (my company provides a competing service and we wanted to find out more about it) and here's what he reported:

    Starting nmap 3.50 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2004-04-22 23:04 EDT
    Interesting ports on secure.spymac.com (213.218.8.109):
    (The 1646 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)
    PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
    22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 3.8p1 (protocol 2.0)
    25/tcp open smtp Postfix smtpd
    80/tcp open http Apache httpd 1.3.27 ((Unix) PHP/4.3.2 mod_ssl/2.8.14 OpenSSL/0.9.7a)
    111/tcp open rpcbind 2 (rpc #100000)
    135/tcp filtered msrpc
    136/tcp filtered profile
    137/tcp filtered netbios-ns
    138/tcp filtered netbios-dgm
    139/tcp filtered netbios-ssn
    443/tcp open ssl/http Apache httpd 1.3.27 ((Unix) PHP/4.3.2 mod_ssl/2.8.14 OpenSSL/0.9.7a)
    445/tcp filtered microsoft-ds
    10000/tcp open http Webmin httpd
    32770/tcp open mountd 1-3 (rpc #100005)
    Device type: general purpose
    Running: Linux 2.4.X|2.5.X
    OS details: Linux Kernel 2.4.0 - 2.5.20
    Uptime 36.913 days (since Sun Feb 29 16:28:06 2004)

    Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 48.450 seconds

  252. FUD. Stop. Stop FUD. Stop. by dave1212 · · Score: 1

    The information you fill out on Spymac is only a total of around 15 fields over 2 pages. Don't know where you got this 'six pages' thing..
    You only need to fill out the other parts of the profile if you are planning on paying for the hosting service or selling in the auctions.

    The account activation only takes 2 weeks because all you non-Mac users came and shat on the servers. Activation was immediate before the 1 GB email was announced,

    As far as things not working, check the forums, they're working on it. It's a community site, where people actually want to build something everyone can enjoy. The admins are working on it, upgrading the system and the servers. This will take some time. We can have patience, why can't you? It's not like it's your main email account all of a sudden.

  253. One of the reasons you lose a lot of sympathy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a Jewish roomie who was convinced I hated her and "her people", and branded me forever as an "Anti-Semite", because I once criticized the actions of Ariel Sharon.

    I don't hate Jewish people. I don't hate Israelis either. But Israeli state policy is not necessarily the same as the personal policy and philosophy of Jewish people.

    I hate much of what the Israeli state says and does, just as I despise the carnage resulting from the actions of Hamas suicide bombers. But just for disagreeing with Isareli state policy (therefore "Israel" and "All Jews") I will be branded a "Jew-Hating Nazi-sympathising Fascist" forever by many reactionary and extremist Jews and Israelis.

    The words and deeds of Palestinian fanatics make Arabic people look bad to the rest of the world. Israeli state policy and behavior makes Israel look bad to the rest of the world.

    Naturally this post will instantly be modded down to -1, Flamebait, or Troll, or Aryan, or whatever. But those that do the modding should understand that such a score and fate doesn't reflect poorly on me.

  254. Personal experience is not FUD. by dr.badass · · Score: 1

    Don't know where you got this 'six pages' thing..

    I got it from the fact that I had to click through six slow, slow, pages before I was 'done' signing up. True, you aren't required to use factual information or any information at all, but there's no reason to think that this is the case when presented with page after page of blanks. Even Yahoo! has the decency to put it all on one, maybe two, pages.

    The account activation only takes 2 weeks because all you non-Mac users came and shat on the servers.

    I don't know who you're referring to when you say "all you non-Mac users", given that I'm a Mac user.

    As for shitting on the servers, I think you're referring to Spymac's inability to handle the demand brought on by their stupid PR move. Sure, I understand how hard it is to predict how bad the load from something like that will be, but it's Spymac's mistake, not the new users'.

    As far as things not working, check the forums, they're working on it.

    And obviously they're so busy working that they can't put a notice somewhere outside of the forums (like maybe in the Support section, or on the front page) that says "Hey, sorry, but half of the services we claim to offer don't work right now, but we're working on it.", so that I don't have to wade through half a million Mac vs. PC flamewars just to find out that I can't actually use the services I came there to use.

    It's a community site, where people actually want to build something everyone can enjoy.

    In my admittedly limited experience with the Spymac community, it seems like that something consists primarily of juvenile flamewars, "Me Too!!!" posts to boost one's activity score, and a dose of anti-Chinese racism.

    To each his own.

    --
    Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.