This is simply not true. Consider Linux kernel, GCC, Debian Linux/GNU and other applications and systems I am not aware of - developers make stability and new features coexist. They maintain two versions - stable and unstable. The first is that you know will remain stable and the second has new features creeping into it every two days. Time from time unstable version freezes and becomes the stable one.
Sure, not everybody uses this way, but it's up to developer.
While the linux is superior OS to W2K, enforcing its usage is not a good way to promote it. Users should make their own choice based on their needs and not government policy.
DOS version of Quake I was compiled with DJGPP.
In what way it is better than DJGPP? Look there Disclaimer: I don't have watcom c myself, so I cannot verify info there.
I think you'll be interested in
5 2/compila.html
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/65
This is simply not true. Consider Linux kernel, GCC, Debian Linux/GNU and other applications and systems I am not aware of - developers make stability and new features coexist. They maintain two versions - stable and unstable. The first is that you know will remain stable and the second has new features creeping into it every two days. Time from time unstable version freezes and becomes the stable one.
Sure, not everybody uses this way, but it's up to developer.
While the linux is superior OS to W2K, enforcing
its usage is not a good way to promote it. Users
should make their own choice based on their needs
and not government policy.