That's not what I'm saying. I'm presenting an argument to defend the people who are trying to preserve their private property rights.
This woman has no right to be on Facebook. She was allowed there, as long as she followed some rules. She broke the rules and was punished. Now she's crying because she broke the clearly written rules.
It'd be like if you went into a 7-11 and started rubbing your dick through your pants. You'd be asked to leave.
The action makes no difference, the fact is she broke the rules she agreed to and was punished.
I have nothing against 'the globalizers!LOL' but I do have something against a visitor on private property ignoring the rules and bitching when they're asked to leave after breaking them.
I'm not against it. What I am FOR, though, is the rights of the private property the mother is on. If she is asked to stop or to leave, she must do those things. It's not a difficult concept. I can't just bust into your house and jack my dick off. Can I?
I always remembered to grab my iPod when I headed out the door. I almost always forgot my cellphone. When the iPhone was announced I knew that it was a solution to my problem. I haven't left the house once without my iPhone.
And there are some people, believe it or not, who actually like buying music and video through the iTMS.
So you're saying all websites with a TOS agreement that says "no titties" is now liable for any traffic it carries?
What law school did you go to? 'cause this is a simple matter of "she broke the terms of use, she disagrees with the terms of use, she should get off of facebook and find somewhere her pictures are welcome." That's it. No more, no less.
Breast feeding isn't an intimate act? Do you know that the chemicals released in the brain during breast feeding are what help bond mother and baby? That those same chemicals are used by con artists to get people to be more trusting?
There's a difference between a statue and a picture of real tits. The rule is simple. If you do not like the rule, go somewhere else. The fact that it wouldn't be "easy" for you to build up a network of all your friends isn't Facebook's issue, it's yours.
That's the exact problem I've had with Vista since the start. In XP I could open up a network adapter status window with two clicks. I could change all my display settings in a window with tabs for the different kinds of customization. But with Vista? It's like 5-10 clicks to do anything useful.
I think pressing the quicksave button is itself part of the challenge. Do you want to overwrite your last save with this new one? What if one of the choices you made between it and where you are now was what determined your game ending?
That's awesome. So when your son was better at something than you, you called him names, took your ball, and went home. I'm sure that when he was growing up and you two would have little competitions, when you were better than him you rubbed it in his face. Am I right?
That's just great parenting. Keep up the awesome work. Try crying more, too.
Slashdot Mirror
Are those benchmarks using Vista SP1? If not, they don't mean anything.
The win7 beta EULA says no benchmarking. This is his way around that. If he could have posted times he would have.
Your point is that you want all games to be super easy for casuals so you don't have to be good to play.
That's a dumb point. You're a dumb person for even trying to make it.
That's not what I'm saying. I'm presenting an argument to defend the people who are trying to preserve their private property rights.
This woman has no right to be on Facebook. She was allowed there, as long as she followed some rules. She broke the rules and was punished. Now she's crying because she broke the clearly written rules.
It'd be like if you went into a 7-11 and started rubbing your dick through your pants. You'd be asked to leave.
The action makes no difference, the fact is she broke the rules she agreed to and was punished.
I have nothing against 'the globalizers!LOL' but I do have something against a visitor on private property ignoring the rules and bitching when they're asked to leave after breaking them.
I was severely lactose intolerant as a child and raised on soy milk.
I'm not against it. What I am FOR, though, is the rights of the private property the mother is on. If she is asked to stop or to leave, she must do those things. It's not a difficult concept. I can't just bust into your house and jack my dick off. Can I?
I always remembered to grab my iPod when I headed out the door. I almost always forgot my cellphone. When the iPhone was announced I knew that it was a solution to my problem. I haven't left the house once without my iPhone.
And there are some people, believe it or not, who actually like buying music and video through the iTMS.
So you're saying all websites with a TOS agreement that says "no titties" is now liable for any traffic it carries?
What law school did you go to? 'cause this is a simple matter of "she broke the terms of use, she disagrees with the terms of use, she should get off of facebook and find somewhere her pictures are welcome." That's it. No more, no less.
Keep a bottle of milk with you. There are breast pumps for just such a reason.
Breast feeding isn't an intimate act? Do you know that the chemicals released in the brain during breast feeding are what help bond mother and baby? That those same chemicals are used by con artists to get people to be more trusting?
This is the same issue we have gone over again and again here on /. when talking about blocking cellphone reception in movie theaters.
I allow you onto my private property to eat at my restaurant. I can tell you to leave for any, or even no, reason.
There's a difference between a statue and a picture of real tits. The rule is simple. If you do not like the rule, go somewhere else. The fact that it wouldn't be "easy" for you to build up a network of all your friends isn't Facebook's issue, it's yours.
TLDR: Follow the rules or GTFO.
Enjoy your e.coli.
Whos 18th birthday? The tree they peed on? The beer they drank that made them have to piss?
That's the exact problem I've had with Vista since the start. In XP I could open up a network adapter status window with two clicks. I could change all my display settings in a window with tabs for the different kinds of customization. But with Vista? It's like 5-10 clicks to do anything useful.
Those llamas can pretty sexy.
I feel a strong drive to slaughter as many meatbags as possible. Is that a bad sign?
If you aren't able to play a harder game, either work on your skill or pick up another game.
It's punishment for failing. You don't get the cheese if you hit the "shock" button.
Right, 'cause teaching your kid that when you're losing you call the winner names and storm off... that's good parenting.
;)
$5 says you're the guy I replied to originally.
I'd kill for the ability to have two saves on a pokemon game. I may be 23 but I still freaking love those games.
And the part where a GPS device is installed in your vehicle.
I think pressing the quicksave button is itself part of the challenge. Do you want to overwrite your last save with this new one? What if one of the choices you made between it and where you are now was what determined your game ending?
That's awesome. So when your son was better at something than you, you called him names, took your ball, and went home. I'm sure that when he was growing up and you two would have little competitions, when you were better than him you rubbed it in his face. Am I right?
That's just great parenting. Keep up the awesome work. Try crying more, too.