The reason is simple: the poster of this article only pointed to one of the four year-end reviews I wrote. The one on content services, http://www.drmwatch.com/ocr/article.php/3294461, mentions Apple and iTunes prominently.
We at DRM Watch are not "pro-DRM". We are pro "technology that balances the rights of copyright owners and end-users." Much DRM today doesn't do this, but we need to get there. We also do not spam, and we do respond to remove requests.
Because the original poster only linked to one of the four year-end review articles I wrote. Commentary on Apple and other online music players is in the review of Online Content Services, at http://www.drmwatch.com/ocr/article.php/3294461.
Slashdot Mirror
The reason is simple: the poster of this article only pointed to one of the four year-end reviews I wrote. The one on content services, http://www.drmwatch.com/ocr/article.php/3294461, mentions Apple and iTunes prominently.
We at DRM Watch are not "pro-DRM". We are pro "technology that balances the rights of copyright owners and end-users." Much DRM today doesn't do this, but we need to get there. We also do not spam, and we do respond to remove requests.
Because the original poster only linked to one of the four year-end review articles I wrote. Commentary on Apple and other online music players is in the review of Online Content Services, at http://www.drmwatch.com/ocr/article.php/3294461.