Cleveland has a growing technology sector. It's highly affordable, we have awesome restaurants and breweries and fantastic cultural sights (art museum, PlayhouseSquare, etc.).
If I learned anything from SimCity it was to never let your reactor stay online beyond its intended life - unless you have disasters turned off, of course.
This brings up a question. My organization replaced our old ERP and CRM-like system which was bought 20 years ago with the source code and heavily customized. The administration (through thir consultants-ugh) declined to buy the source code licenses for the new applications because "modern organizations don't buy source code licenses anymore." Now, predictably, people are upset because we cannot tailor the apps to our business rules. My question is whether the statement of the consultant is crap or not: do companies nor buy the source code license and solely rely on vendors to make changes via upgrades or custom programming?
Our legacy system was a "hey only one person can write files to this directory but you can copy the files to this directory for developmenstuction" setup. When I mentioned source control I was looked at like I was the new kid telling them what to do because they had no problems with their current system (in their minds). Rough stuff.
But I've been running the RC for SP1 for a bit now, and my system still crashes like the RTM version.
I've been meaning to uninstall Vista for awhile. I think it's my hardware being too old, though (Athlon XP 2000+, ABIT NF7-S2 motherboard, 1.5GB RAM)
I agree. I work in an accessible junior high school and I had to change the desktop shortcut to GNU Image Manipulation Program because I got complaints about it being offensive. It may seem silly to some, but I can understand the concern.
MSN? Must be a different crowd. I don't know anyone with MSN. Almost everyone I know uses AIM, but it's the same basic principle. The new AIM client is annoying, though. Gotta love Trillian.
I dunno about it not being dangerous. I've hit those link farm pages before, and they've tried to install spyware or change homepage or do other malicious things (this was pre-Firefox days for me, at least).
Slashdot Mirror
Cleveland has a growing technology sector. It's highly affordable, we have awesome restaurants and breweries and fantastic cultural sights (art museum, PlayhouseSquare, etc.).
Correct. The IDE runs only on WinXP. 7, 8, 10, no go.
I was working in a system in 2009 which had code commits as far back as 1983.
We have neither the money nor the vacation time to go anywhere.
If I learned anything from SimCity it was to never let your reactor stay online beyond its intended life - unless you have disasters turned off, of course.
This brings up a question. My organization replaced our old ERP and CRM-like system which was bought 20 years ago with the source code and heavily customized. The administration (through thir consultants-ugh) declined to buy the source code licenses for the new applications because "modern organizations don't buy source code licenses anymore." Now, predictably, people are upset because we cannot tailor the apps to our business rules. My question is whether the statement of the consultant is crap or not: do companies nor buy the source code license and solely rely on vendors to make changes via upgrades or custom programming?
Looking at the NARA article, as soon as I saw that some big IT contract was given to Lockheed Martin I saw all I needed to know about this initiative.
Tweaking and submitting would be removing the plagiarism, which would still be caught on the instructor side. I fail to see the conflict here.
This is all well-and-good until someone accidentally knocks out the power. Then all of that stuff needs recomputed if it's not stored to disk.
Our legacy system was a "hey only one person can write files to this directory but you can copy the files to this directory for developmenstuction" setup. When I mentioned source control I was looked at like I was the new kid telling them what to do because they had no problems with their current system (in their minds). Rough stuff.
Atlanta!
Wow, awesome deduction there, Sherlock.
Akron, Ohio's network is up and going.
http://www.onecommunity.org/programs/programs.aspx?id=518
What about RT? http://bestpractical.com/rt/
But I've been running the RC for SP1 for a bit now, and my system still crashes like the RTM version. I've been meaning to uninstall Vista for awhile. I think it's my hardware being too old, though (Athlon XP 2000+, ABIT NF7-S2 motherboard, 1.5GB RAM)
I agree. I work in an accessible junior high school and I had to change the desktop shortcut to GNU Image Manipulation Program because I got complaints about it being offensive. It may seem silly to some, but I can understand the concern.
No, but it does help protect against sunburn.
I'm looking at you, Lexmark...
like the Red-Green coalition in Germany until recently Was it held together by duct tape?
MSN? Must be a different crowd. I don't know anyone with MSN. Almost everyone I know uses AIM, but it's the same basic principle. The new AIM client is annoying, though. Gotta love Trillian.
Yeah, but if you're drunk, you might get confused, think you're in a club, and start to grind on the steering wheel.
Dammit, we need to build more tubes! Now! And tubes of varying shapes and styles!
Wow, the iPod Nano can desalinise water? Wow, is there anything Steve Jobs can't do? Oh... wait. Nevermind...
I dunno about it not being dangerous. I've hit those link farm pages before, and they've tried to install spyware or change homepage or do other malicious things (this was pre-Firefox days for me, at least).
No way, there can't be anyone making dishonest or cheap mem... PAGE_FAULT_IN_NONPAGED_AREA