It says that rock *must* be thrown 50% of the time. Not that there is a 50/50 chance of the choice being rock for each game. So the number of games *has* to be set out before gaming commences. As you draw closer to the last game, the odds will change to how likely rock will be thrown. This is very similar to counting cards in a blackjack.
Most set to smart media players are shipping with Cinavia. Roku, Netgear NeoTV, now WDTV Live, to name a popular few implement Cinavia protection. Going forward it will eventually be all of them.
I'm not even going to comment on your other "solutions".
The torrented version up to this point had 3 ways to go with this:
- Rip from bluray and tell people trying to play it on a smart appliance that detects the cinavia watermark "lol ur stewpid. Get real hardware loser" or "OMG it plays on my laptop via VLC fine. Shut up n00b."
- Maim the audio stream to an unintelligible mess to the point the water mark isn't detected, but deal with the fact that you can't even tell what you are hearing most of the time
- Rip the audio stream from the DVD copy and match it up with the bluray video stream
The last was the most popular until recently where they are putting cinavia in the audio tracks of the DVDs as well now.
"Audio outputs temporarily muted. Do not adjust the playback volume. The content being played is protected by Cinavia
and is not authorized for playback on this device. For more information, see http://www.cinavia.com./ Message Code 3."
No, see, everyone that is displaced by automation should "Quit being lazy and find a job!":| There will be an ever increasing pool of jobless folks competing for an ever shrinking job pool. This is why the welfare and healthcare issues right now are so important. If we allow them to scale them back or even terminate them, imagine when a majority of everyone needs it.
Sure. Kylix and Quake 2 are the first that come to mind (in terms of commercial software). But if you want to see something more GPL/Open Source originating, take, say, XFree86 from Slackware 4.0 and try to run it on Slackware 14. Same thing.
Man, you are making a HUGE assumption that the binaries are accompanied by source code. If it was a contracted piece or a commercial piece, this is certainly not the case
you can always upgrade to a newer kernel, and you're not going to break anything in the process.
This is just wrong. Threading and libc compatibility isn't transferable between 2.4 and 2.6. There are innumerable 2.4 applications which will flat out not run on a 2.6 system. The same goes between 2.2 and 2.4. And 2.0 and 2.2.
Replying to the second part. All functions are members of something in VB. At the very least, they are members of ModuleName. So if you have a module "Frank", that has a function "Cheese", it can be (and is underneath) via "Frank.Cheese()". In terms of the DoCmd object, it is the way VBA communicates/interacts WITH Office. A list of members can be found here. You can also bring up the object browser via F2 when inside the VBA IDE
Of course it is. However, it is like PHP in the sense that non-programmers can wield the magic wand and crank something out that LOOKS like it works, but at the very core is garbage. That has no baring on if the language is capable of being used well.
Now with that said, VB.NET can almost be line for line compatible with C#. They are both.NET languages and can do the exact same things. If you are talking VB classic, that is a whole other beast. While it is/was possible to write good code in it, it was meant to be a dirty ActiveX host with some glue code to make it all work. If you went outside of its intended use, you had some pretty scary abominations forming.
You aren't looking back far enough. The "with-it" trendy people as you call them, mined bitcoins or bought them when they were worth ~$1 or less. If the world comes crashing down and they end up back there, they lost nothing. I believe you are thinking of the people that only cared about bitcoin when it began to have some exchangeable value, where bitcoin was an investment, or a scheme to get rich. These will be the people who suffer. These are the ones who "fell for the scam"
Slashdot Mirror
It says that rock *must* be thrown 50% of the time. Not that there is a 50/50 chance of the choice being rock for each game. So the number of games *has* to be set out before gaming commences. As you draw closer to the last game, the odds will change to how likely rock will be thrown. This is very similar to counting cards in a blackjack.
Coincidence?
Quite possibly
Evaluating the merits of a language within 5 minutes, a brief article, and personal bias... seems legit
UltraLaser... DoctorDoom...
Most set to smart media players are shipping with Cinavia. Roku, Netgear NeoTV, now WDTV Live, to name a popular few implement Cinavia protection. Going forward it will eventually be all of them.
I'm not even going to comment on your other "solutions".
The last was the most popular until recently where they are putting cinavia in the audio tracks of the DVDs as well now.
"Audio outputs temporarily muted. Do not adjust the playback volume. The content being played is protected by Cinavia and is not authorized for playback on this device. For more information, see http://www.cinavia.com./ Message Code 3."
Never going to happen. DUIs of people at that level is very very lucrative
The cops and psychiatrists do it all just the same.
No one WANTS VNC. The very idea of POLLING for changes is pretty much the worst approach to a remote display that you can come up with.
No, no they haven't. If you google search, you come up with "Something something someone somewhere greasmonkey".
No, see, everyone that is displaced by automation should "Quit being lazy and find a job!" :| There will be an ever increasing pool of jobless folks competing for an ever shrinking job pool. This is why the welfare and healthcare issues right now are so important. If we allow them to scale them back or even terminate them, imagine when a majority of everyone needs it.
By the time a CPU submits a share it is stale. There are much more profitable ways to use a botnet
They certainly won't have access to the 3rd party widget X that they are using
Sure. Kylix and Quake 2 are the first that come to mind (in terms of commercial software). But if you want to see something more GPL/Open Source originating, take, say, XFree86 from Slackware 4.0 and try to run it on Slackware 14. Same thing.
Man, you are making a HUGE assumption that the binaries are accompanied by source code. If it was a contracted piece or a commercial piece, this is certainly not the case
Because of Visual Studio, that's why. Diebold in particular has a few in-house devs that exclusively use Visual Basic.
you can always upgrade to a newer kernel, and you're not going to break anything in the process.
This is just wrong. Threading and libc compatibility isn't transferable between 2.4 and 2.6. There are innumerable 2.4 applications which will flat out not run on a 2.6 system. The same goes between 2.2 and 2.4. And 2.0 and 2.2.
More like Seroquel
They usually have experience, but this usually requires that you pay more. If younger workers can do the job well enough, why not go cheap?
Because the cumulative of 20 years experience they are looking for can actually be had by the older worker.
This is simply not correct, which is why I asked the question. http://www.publicopiniononline.com/opinion/ci_6300968
Replying to the second part. All functions are members of something in VB. At the very least, they are members of ModuleName. So if you have a module "Frank", that has a function "Cheese", it can be (and is underneath) via "Frank.Cheese()". In terms of the DoCmd object, it is the way VBA communicates/interacts WITH Office. A list of members can be found here. You can also bring up the object browser via F2 when inside the VBA IDE
Of course it is. However, it is like PHP in the sense that non-programmers can wield the magic wand and crank something out that LOOKS like it works, but at the very core is garbage. That has no baring on if the language is capable of being used well.
.NET languages and can do the exact same things. If you are talking VB classic, that is a whole other beast. While it is/was possible to write good code in it, it was meant to be a dirty ActiveX host with some glue code to make it all work. If you went outside of its intended use, you had some pretty scary abominations forming.
Now with that said, VB.NET can almost be line for line compatible with C#. They are both
Do these record sound as well? How legal is this in an all party state, where everyone has to consent to being recorded and a suspect refuses?
You aren't looking back far enough. The "with-it" trendy people as you call them, mined bitcoins or bought them when they were worth ~$1 or less. If the world comes crashing down and they end up back there, they lost nothing. I believe you are thinking of the people that only cared about bitcoin when it began to have some exchangeable value, where bitcoin was an investment, or a scheme to get rich. These will be the people who suffer. These are the ones who "fell for the scam"