Slashdot Mirror


Research Suggests Pulling All-Nighters Can Cause Permanent Damage

First time accepted submitter nani popoki writes "Skipping a good night's sleep can cause brain damage according to a new study. From the article: 'Are you a truck driver or shift worker planning to catch up on some sleep this weekend? Cramming in extra hours of shut-eye may not make up for those lost pulling all-nighters, new research indicates. The damage may already be done — brain damage, that is, said neuroscientist Sigrid Veasey from the University of Pennsylvania. The widely held idea that you can pay back a sizeable "sleep debt" with long naps later on seems to be a myth, she said in a study published this week in the Journal of Neuroscience. Long-term sleep deprivation saps the brain of power even after days of recovery sleep, Veasey said. And that could be a sign of lasting brain injury.'"

144 comments

  1. Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Shit.

    1. Re:Oh... by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, also: oh, bullshit.

      If this were true I wouldn't even have a brain left.

      I bet there are so many caveats here that the truth of this is almost certain to be lost in the noise. People differ so much, I tend to take it with a very large dose of salt when someone tells me such and such consequences are inevitable. People smoke their entire lives, no cancer. Others, bang, almost right away. Some people have immense physical stamina. Some enjoy the night. Some like the day. Some think kids are the most wonderful thing in the world, others think they're the purest form of annoyance. Some people live for sex, others don't care.

      And then there's the stats angle... Headline: "your chances are TWICE the nomal fella if you (fill in the blank)", when it turns out that the chances for the normal fella are one in ten thousand, and yours are now a whopping 1 in 5000. Yawn.

      Nah, not buying it. Think I'll skip sleeping tonight and play with my radios. :) 80 meters is open all night, and it's pretty quiet (in the atmospheric noise sense) now!

      You know what probably REALLY gives you brain damage? Superstition.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    2. Re:Oh... by invictusvoyd · · Score: 2

      People differ so much, I tend to take it with a very large dose of salt when someone tells me such and such consequences are inevitable

      There is a lot of truth in what u're sayin. But the ones u mention are statistically rare cases. I wreck my circadian rythm every now and then and yes the next day is buzzed. What the article suggests is , unlike previous belief that it's like an account where you can lose some sleep and make up for it aint entirely true. It takes a while to make up for it.

    3. Re:Oh... by milkmage · · Score: 5, Informative

      did you actually RTFA?

      LONG TERM sleep deprivation. As in your lifestyle - swing shifters, etc. Not the occasional amphetamine binge, or caffeine fueled cram/D&D/gaming session.

      never mind the actual experiment they conducted where they found neurons destroyed in the brains of mice that were kept on a wonky sleep schedule.

      our bodies are TUNED to be active during the day, sleep at night.

      probably contributes to jetlag.. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C... "Although circadian rhythms are endogenous ("built-in", self-sustained), they are adjusted (entrained) to the local environment by external cues called zeitgebers, commonly the most important of which is daylight."

    4. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think that you still have a brain? :-)

    5. Re:Oh... by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 2

      You know what probably REALLY gives you brain damage? Superstition.

      A pity superstition (like stupidity in general) isn't painful. Stupid should hurt, dammnit.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    6. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what probably REALLY gives you brain damage? Superstition.

      Nah. But attempting to critically read every single published study that purports to authoritatively declare what causes brain damage, eventually will.

    7. Re:Oh... by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

      Even when I'm on a normal circadian rhythm, I'm way more awake at night than during the day. Natural sunlight makes me sleepy.

    8. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet there are so many caveats here that the truth of this is almost certain to be lost in the noise.

      My first thought was nutrition is way more of a controlling factor than length of time spent in the condition, because nutrition controls the severity of differences that would be perceived as damage. Much like saying boiling things absolutely destroys everything without talking about whether boiling is room temperature or whether we are boiling water or something else...
      More to the point of nutrition, indeed when the human body needs sleep we undergo chemical changes, but our entire existence is just one really long chemical reaction, and the biggest contributing factor is what chemical fuel is being dumped into it. Eating the proper foods and perhaps even yes drugs, could very easily conceivably mitigate and/or prevent any kind of damage caused by lack of sleep, up until the point that those mitigating elements start to have consequences themselves. My gut tells me the average human can go about 36 hours with the proper nutrition and not get any permenant damage. Above average humans probably max out at 48 or so. Not that it couldn't be done after that, even pleasantly, just not without causing permenant tissue damage as described in TFA.
      captcha: mesquite. mmm fried brains...

    9. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know what probably REALLY gives you brain damage? Superstition.

      It's bad luck to be superstitious.

    10. Re:Oh... by VVelox · · Score: 1

      Congrats, you are nocturnal.

      Embrace it and you will be much happier. Been professionally nocturnal for 7 years now and I love it. If you live in a big city is is actually very easy to do.

    11. Re:Oh... by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know what probably REALLY gives you brain damage? Superstition.

      Fortunately a lucky rabbit's foot gives 100% protection against this effect.

    12. Re:Oh... by gutnor · · Score: 2

      I tend to take it with a very large dose of salt

      Well taking that much salt will clog your arteries and you will die in horrible suffering studies say :-)

    13. Re:Oh... by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mostly, I agree with what you say. But I do believe that long term sleep deprivation is not healthy. I once read a believable article claiming that sleep clears the brain of waste chemicals, kind of like going to the bathroom. Without losing that waste it starts to build up and poison you.

      Other than that, it's also rather straightforward self-experience. If you feel like shit after pulling 24hrs it's probably because shit is happening to you. Just like when drinking too much alcohol.

    14. Re:Oh... by asylumx · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article isn't about whether you sleep at night or not, it's about whether you skip sleep regularly.

    15. Re:Oh... by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      What about that study where they found neurons destroyed in the brain every day just from living? And those other ones showing the brain rerouting around damage?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    16. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      never mind the actual experiment they conducted where they found neurons destroyed in the brains of mice that were kept on a wonky sleep schedule.

      our bodies are TUNED to be active during the day, sleep at night.

      In Mice? And how many times have we been through this? Mice are not humans and experiments done in mice are not reliable. Do you bother to read the numerous articles, and then read the comments with citations proving that experiments done with mice and then done in humans are unpredictable? You'll get a different result in a human then you did in the mice.

      ""I bet there are so many caveats here that the truth of this is almost certain to be lost in the noise. People differ so much, I tend to take it with a very large dose of salt when someone tells me such and such consequences are inevitable. People smoke their entire lives, no cancer. Others, bang, almost right away. Some people have immense physical stamina. Some enjoy the night. Some like the day. Some think kids are the most wonderful thing in the world, others think they're the purest form of annoyance. Some people live for sex, others don't care.""

      If you read quote from fyngyrz, you'll note that "in known human experiments" a person emotional state is tied into how there brains, and overall health, keep them healthy and happy. SO it is completely reasonable that a person who is a night owl, is far happier then if he/she was a day person.

      Something else you fail at, and the people that modded this up. Are stress levels... Or did we forget how that also destroys healthy brains. I can promise you that stress levels no matter what time of day you prefer were ignored in this latest idiot experiment..

    17. Re:Oh... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      LONG TERM sleep deprivation. As in your lifestyle - swing shifters, etc.

      So what about people who permanently work 3rd shift? Is it just a problem for people who keep shifting their schedule around?

    18. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine that if stupid did hurt people wouldn't get unstupid, but instead cry "God, why have you forsaken me!" all the time. That's how this type of person usually solves problems. Essentially, making stupid hurt wouldn't solve a bloody thing. Of course, it would be entertaining still :)

    19. Re:Oh... by Scragglykat · · Score: 1

      I was try to refute these claims but all I can muster is "derp derp derp" after spending the past month playing Rust instead of sleeping.

    20. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      did you actually RTFA?

      LONG TERM sleep deprivation. As in your lifestyle - swing shifters, etc.

      Yeah...no. Been on a 3-5 awake 1-2 asleep schedule for about a decade and a half now, no ill effects - my productivity has actually increased. The only really noticable thing is if I hit 5 days I might become narcoleptic and pass out wherever so I try to keep it to 3.

    21. Re:Oh... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Embrace it and you will be much happier

      Proceed with caution - This can cause issues depending on where you are in your life, or where you want to be. If you want to one day settle down with someone and have kids, then a nocturnal lifestyle is really incompatible with that. My sister is married to a nocturnal guy, and now that they have two kids it puts a real stress on their marriage. School, school events, swimming lessons, birthday parties - These regular 'family life' events all occur during the daylight hours and he's always asleep or if he does come to them he's a useless zombie...

    22. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeanne Calment had the longest documented human lifespan in history. She lived to the age of 122 years. She smoked for 96 years of those years: from the age of 21 to age 117. She enjoyed a diet rich in fat (mainly olive oil) and alcohol (port wine). She ate nearly one 1kg/2.2lbs of chocolate every week. Calment reportedly remained mentally intact until her very end in 1997.

    23. Re:Oh... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      A pity superstition (like stupidity in general) isn't painful. Stupid should hurt, dammnit.

      It is, and it does. But pain is a bad, ambiguous teacher: does it hurt because you are a Neo-Nazi in modern-day Germany or because you are an antifascist in Nazi Germany?

      The only thing pain tells you is that you're at odds with your surroundings. It does not reveal which one, if either, is in the right.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    24. Re:Oh... by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      I bet she slept regular hours.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    25. Re:Oh... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you also think that drinking a lot of soda pop will not make you fat?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    26. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Am Not A Neuroscientist (IANAN) but I've studied neurobiology as part of my minor and the take-away point of brain damage is that it is cumulative. That is : minor brain damage can heal up quite well, but any add-on damage while still healing compounds the problem. At some point the damage will get so big that it is partially permanent or that decreased functioning will last for a long time.

      In that respect, the damage of an all-nighter, a slight blow to the head or other minor sources isn't bad and is something your brain can deal with. It's sustained an compound damage that leads to higher chances of permanent (or long-term) decreased in functioning. You cán exert your brain, just give it time to rest.

      However, if you're a binge-drinking, professional boxer that pulls all-nighters and compensates for the drinking with extreme exercise (gotta be in shape for boxing), I'm willing to put down a substantial amount of money that you'll incur permanent brain damage by merit of that daily regimen.

    27. Re:Oh... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Except that real lucky rabbits don't lose their feet and have to get prosthetics fitted. You're only getting unlucky rabbits' feet.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    28. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absoluely! There are tall asians too, ergo relativism!

    29. Re:Oh... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Yeah, also: oh, bullshit.

      If this were true I wouldn't even have a brain left.

      I bet there are so many caveats here that the truth of this is almost certain to be lost in the noise. People differ so much, I tend to take it with a very large dose of salt when someone tells me such and such consequences are inevitable. People smoke their entire lives, no cancer. Others, bang, almost right away. Some people have immense physical stamina. Some enjoy the night. Some like the day. Some think kids are the most wonderful thing in the world, others think they're the purest form of annoyance. Some people live for sex, others don't care.

      And then there's the stats angle... Headline: "your chances are TWICE the nomal fella if you (fill in the blank)", when it turns out that the chances for the normal fella are one in ten thousand, and yours are now a whopping 1 in 5000. Yawn.

      Nah, not buying it. Think I'll skip sleeping tonight and play with my radios. :) 80 meters is open all night, and it's pretty quiet (in the atmospheric noise sense) now!

      You know what probably REALLY gives you brain damage? Superstition.

      ===
      How would you know if the all nighter is BS? After all, you may be thinking that because your brain was modified (ie, damaged in a particular way).

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  2. sounds implausible to me by stenvar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sleep deprivation has been a natural and common occurrence throughout human evolution. It seems highly implausible that "an all-nighter" would cause permanent brain damage in any meaningful sense.

    1. Re:sounds implausible to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actual affect is far more likely marginal, and only after you push it for a long time.

      Because if it caused brain damage, I wouldn't be able to type after my years of rolling sleep deprivation.

      Now the damage it does to your heart, that's real.

    2. Re:sounds implausible to me by khasim · · Score: 1

      And if it did cause damage, then wouldn't an MRI or such be able to show the damage?

    3. Re:sounds implausible to me by pipedwho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sleep deprivation has been a natural and common occurrence throughout human evolution. It seems highly implausible that "an all-nighter" would cause permanent brain damage in any meaningful sense.

      I doubt a single all-nighter is going to cause a measurable change to your long term brain function. However, anything that takes a small toll, may become measurable in aggregate after a given number of occurrences.

      Regarding human evolution; people generally sleep when it is dark. And with no unnatural sources of light, historically sleep deprivation would not have been anywhere near as common as it has become in modern society.

    4. Re:sounds implausible to me by artor3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Being eaten by tigers was also common and natural. Natural is not a synonym for healthy.

      This study is a long way from proving anything, but I suspect a lot of people will just dismiss it entirely because they don't want to believe it.

    5. Re:sounds implausible to me by khellendros1984 · · Score: 3, Informative

      About all that could be really said is that any damage from sleep deprivation didn't tend to kill our ancestors before they bred.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    6. Re:sounds implausible to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could possibly reveal some forms of damage but it's certainly not a definitive test for all types of brain damage... There are a lotttt of variables in the human brain that an MRI can't reveal like thought patterns and neurotransmitter levels and production.
      All an MRI really reveals is a map of blood/cerebrospinal fluid flow. It would also reveal any foreign bodies in the brain like tumors or blood clots or potential aneurysms.

    7. Re:sounds implausible to me by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Probably not unless it was acute or traumatic damage - individual neurons don't show up in modern MRIs, much less individual dendrites, and if the damage is minor and internal to the cells it would be essentially impossible to detect at all with modern technology.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re:sounds implausible to me by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Natural is not a synonym for healthy."

      Unless, of course, you are the tiger.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    9. Re:sounds implausible to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly even the summary sounded benign compared to the headline. I'd imagine the real research is less alarmist more so

    10. Re:sounds implausible to me by stenvar · · Score: 1

      Being eaten by tigers was also common and natural. Natural is not a synonym for healthy.

      Saying that "sleep deprivation is common and natural" is a shorthand for saying that "sleep deprivation has exerted evolutionary pressure on humans frequently and since prehistoric times". If it caused significant and permanent brain damage, it would have reduced human fitness and been selected against, in particular since we know that there are many mammals that can deal with sleep deprivation just fine. Hence, it is implausible that sleep deprivation causes significant and permanent brain damage.

      Are you really so biologically illiterate that you need this spelled out for you? Are you really so biologically illiterate that you are confusing my statement with the common "natural is good" fallacy? Geez.

    11. Re:sounds implausible to me by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Are you really so biologically illiterate that you are confusing my statement with the common "natural is good" fallacy? Geez.

      Are you really so humour-impaired that you are mistaking his witticism for serious debate? :-D

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    12. Re:sounds implausible to me by nbauman · · Score: 1

      And mouse evolution, since this study was done in mice.

      When they replicate this study in humans I'll pay attention.

      Humans are not big mice.

    13. Re:sounds implausible to me by nbauman · · Score: 1

      I suspect a lot of people will dismiss it entirely because it was done on mice, and humans are not big mice.

    14. Re:sounds implausible to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "sleep deprivation has exerted evolutionary pressure on humans frequently and since prehistoric times". If it caused significant and permanent brain damage, it would have reduced human fitness and been selected against

      When I look at humans in general, it does not look to me that impaired brain function impairs their reproductive faculties.

      Au contraire....

      The saying "f*cking your brains out" is not coined for nothing.

    15. Re: sounds implausible to me by dohzer · · Score: 1

      But never in human history has the brain been more important. Perhaps a little damage back hundreds of years equates to a lot of damege in the modern era. Sleep deprivation to catch extra food at the expense of brain power may have been advantageous but brain wastage to play that new game may not be so beneficial.

    16. Re:sounds implausible to me by infolation · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anyone who's had children knows that sleep deprivation, and all-nighters, are routine during the first two years.

      Although, arguably, bringing up kids involves a certain amount of inherent brain damage anyway.

    17. Re:sounds implausible to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it, really. I doubt the permanent damage as well, but I doubt that being a reason if it were true.

      The saying "What doesn't kill a human makes them stronger" doesn't really apply much when it comes to nature and health.

      The chances of being woken at night back in our old early days are a freak occurrence, most likely. Just like our exposure to stressful situations were, or our massive increase in fats, sugars and proteins. The body doesn't know how to handle these effectively when they are a constant or semi-constant.
      These things won't be properly dealt with for at least a good few generations down the line. (and that is only the beginnings of a hundred generation change)
      Fun thing is, it might even result in a hugely noticeable feature deviation in human bodies from all around the globe over the next hundred generations if we keep at it like this. I just hope by then that racism has died out.

      We do know the body is capable of repairing an insane amount of bodily damage. But there are some things that they cannot repair effectively, if at all.
      The brain and heart are two of the largest (both physically and statistically) when it comes to repair problems. Varies so much from person to person that it makes me wonder if those that can repair are seemingly newly evolved abilities that we haven't really catalogued as such and just put it down to fluke. But I am not a geneticist so I can't comment on that bit. I just follow the industry.

    18. Re:sounds implausible to me by ketomax · · Score: 1

      Benjamin Franklin said that there will be plenty of time to sleep once you are dead. What he did not mention was that this abundance of time won't be far away if you keep following his advice.

    19. Re:sounds implausible to me by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And it's implausible that people being eaten by tigers cause death, right?

      There's nothing wrong with the GP's analogy. Sleep deprivation may have been common, but it's not like every human being suffered from it. As a result, like numerous other natural factors, from the plague, the numerous historical waves of lead poisoning (ancient rome, 19th Century plumbing, 20th century car exhausts) to "being eaten by tigers", the mere fact we've survived it doesn't mean that it's harmless.

      But yes, it's (probably) exerted some minor evolutionary pressure, though not the pressure you appear to think (and you're claiming the GP is "biologically illiterate"?)

      This is about minor but very real brain damage. If our bodies have not found a way to adapt to childhood lead poisoning, which has a much greater affect on the brain, then it's pretty safe to assume that human beings have survived in spite of this, not finding some way to make our bodies stronger. A more plausible solution to how we've survived as a species despite numerous natural attacks on our ability to think clearly is that we've evolved, or always were able, to deal with a certain amount of poor thinking, to route around brain damage rather than fix it.

      Is a slightly impaired brain going to prevent the person whose brain it is reproducing? Some would argue the opposite. Will it prevent that person from living? No, because they still function enough to perform the basic tasks required in any society to live, and because the social constructs we've evolved to want and demand provide a minimum level of support for every person. Will it make it harder for that person to bring up their offspring? No, again because they'll still function enough to perform the basic tasks required in any society to live, and because of the aforementioned social constructs.

      The tigers, if anything, are more likely to have had a significant evolutionary effect, in that nobody survives being eaten by one, and so it would stand to reason that we've developed more traits related to avoiding being eaten by tigers than about repairing or preventing brain damage.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    20. Re:sounds implausible to me by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Just to back up the parent, TFA is not talking about one all-nighter, but does say that a few days on a "shift work" sleep schedule (whatever that is) has a dramatic effect. To me this reads as if it's more about getting poor quality sleep on a regular basis, rather than "missing sleep."

      Bear in mind, the linked article is from CNN, and CNN is NOT known for their deep thoughts or complete, or even accurate, coverage.

    21. Re:sounds implausible to me by asylumx · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry that you're modded "funny" because I think you weren't joking.

    22. Re:sounds implausible to me by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0

      CNN is NOT known for their deep thoughts or complete, or even accurate, coverage.

      But the Fox tabloid is, right?

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    23. Re:sounds implausible to me by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 1

      Someone didn't read the study.

      Our brain does have natural defenses against sleep deprivation. A single all-nighter would produce no brain damage because of a specific protein the brain creates to protect it from damage. Repeated sleep deprivation (aka chronic sleep deprivation) leads to brain damage because this protection mechanism stops functioning.

    24. Re:sounds implausible to me by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Food depreciation has been a natural and common occurrence throughout human evolution. It seems highly implausible that "starving" would cause permanent damage in any meaningful sense.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    25. Re:sounds implausible to me by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 1

      Addendum: humans also didn't evolve with artificial lighting or even something like torches. When night time hit there wasn't much else to do but sleep.

    26. Re:sounds implausible to me by careysub · · Score: 2

      Are you really so biologically illiterate that you are confusing my statement with the common "natural is good" fallacy? Geez.

      Easy there pardner. Don't go throwing around accusations of "biological illiteracy" when your premise ("sleep deprivation common throughout human history") has zero support. Before the age of lamps staying up all night would be quite rare, and would not have become particularly prevalent until the age of electric lighting made light cheap and abundantly available at night.

      And since all kinds of things humans were subjected to in prehistory still cause us injury the notion of this broad form of argument is fundamentally flawed.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    27. Re:sounds implausible to me by stenvar · · Score: 1

      And, whaddayaknow, your body has elaborate mechanisms for dealing with food deprivation and starvation. You only die from starvation when your body has run out of all options, and you usually recover fully when your food supply is restored. QED.

    28. Re:sounds implausible to me by stenvar · · Score: 1

      My comment was on the interpretation of the study on Slashdot: "Research Suggests Pulling All-Nighters Can Cause Permanent Damage"

    29. Re:sounds implausible to me by stenvar · · Score: 1

      Humans have had fire for hundreds of thousands of years, more than enough to affect evolution:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

      It's certainly affected evolution of our diet and digestion, and probably our brains.

    30. Re: sounds implausible to me by stenvar · · Score: 1

      Unlike prehistoric times, brain damage today is less likely to get you killed or to prevent you from reproducing. In modern societies, the better your brain functions, the less you reproduce.

    31. Re:sounds implausible to me by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Are you just making that up? Or did you read completely different studies, that studied the detrimental long term effects of starvation?

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    32. Re:sounds implausible to me by operagost · · Score: 1

      People used to get up in the middle of the night and read or do other tasks.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    33. Re:sounds implausible to me by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Why? Brain damage isn't passed on.

      I'm not disagreeing with you; I just don't see how sleep deprivation occurring throughout human history proves that it doesn't cause brain damage. Maybe everybody has just lived with it/not noticed.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    34. Re:sounds implausible to me by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      How do you "select against" a voluntary activity? If we're stubborn enough we'll just do it anyway.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    35. Re:sounds implausible to me by kwrzesien · · Score: 1

      He is being both "funny" and "informative" - depending on which side of the event the reader is on.

    36. Re:sounds implausible to me by sjames · · Score: 1

      The research does not suggest that *AN* all-nighter or even an occasional all-nighter will cause a problem. It suggests that routine disruption of the sleep cycle might cause a problem.

      Much like a lifetime of daily hour long tanning sessions will cause considerable skin damage but it doesn't mean you are at risk of 3rd degree burns walking to your car in the daytime.

    37. Re:sounds implausible to me by asylumx · · Score: 1

      But the Fox tabloid is, right?

      Hell no. What, out of my post, would make any reasonable person infer that? WTF is wrong with you?

    38. Re:sounds implausible to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to the tick the Post Anonymously box.

  3. Well that's lovely by jonnythan · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... as I read this at 1 AM when I have to be up at 6:30 tomorrow. Heh. "Tomorrow."

    1. Re:Well that's lovely by stoploss · · Score: 2

      ... as I read this at 1 AM when I have to be up at 6:30 tomorrow. Heh. "Tomorrow."

      ...as I read this at 4 AM when I have to be up at 6:30 tomorrow. At which point does one simply write off sleep for the night if solely because getting a small amount feels worse than no sleep at all?

    2. Re:Well that's lovely by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Anything below 4.5 hours for me, although that was a couple years back when I could still handle 5 hours of sleep a night, and 4.5 for only 1 or 2 a week. Although getting any less than that wasn't practical more for the reason that I *would* sleep through the alarm rather than that I would feel like shit and be falling asleep the next day (although that was also true).

      Once every couple months I would have a day where I slept through my alarm anyway and woke up at like 4pm :)

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    3. Re:Well that's lovely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing I learned in college is any amount of sleep is always better than just going all the way through. As long as you can manage to wake up without missing that final, again. Perhaps a big "if".

    4. Re:Well that's lovely by Valdrax · · Score: 2

      At which point does one simply write off sleep for the night if solely because getting a small amount feels worse than no sleep at all?

      At my age? Never. ANY sleep is better than no sleep. Otherwise you spend the day microsleeping and only waking when your head dips.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  4. Dec 2013 Research by mynamestolen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dec2103 Cut and Paste from internet (I didn't record where): Sleep deprivation has long been established as a helpful tool for the treatment of patients suffering from depression. However, how and why it works are still unknown. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have indicated that large-scale brain network connectivity, especially in the so-called default mode network, seems to be changed in depression. Bosch et al. investigated whether sleep deprivation could influence this brain connectivity. They discovered that sleep deprivation decreased functional connectivity between a brain area called the posterior cingulate cortex and the bilateral anterior cingulate cortex. In contrast, connectivity between the dorsal nexus, a region that plays a crucial role in the pathophysiology of depression, and two areas within the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was increased. These sleep deprivation–induced changes in resting-state connectivity indicate a shift in dominance from a more affective to a more cognitive network. This shift toward improved cognitive control should be particularly beneficial in depressed patients who suffer from rumination, negative anticipation, and excessive feelings of guilt and shame.

    --
    work in progress
    1. Re:Dec 2013 Research by Demonantis · · Score: 1

      Possible source: http://www.pnas.org/content/ea.... Unfortunately paywalled.

    2. Re:Dec 2013 Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a miracle cure. Sleep deprivation at the wrong time to the wrong person can also contribute to the development or worsening of depression.

    3. Re:Dec 2013 Research by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I have also noticed that mild sleep deprivation (sleeping for only 6 hours for example) can temporarily make me feel better if I have been feeling a bit "moody" lately.

    4. Re:Dec 2013 Research by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Very interesting. So what they are saying is that there are advantages and disadvantages to both sides of the "sleep loss" story. Imagine that -- the world is not black & white!

      Thanks for the post!

    5. Re:Dec 2013 Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone with clinical depression and who has attempted suicide a few times (yeah, I failed at that too), from experience sleep deprivation numbs the brain. You feel less depressed because you feel less of everything. Your brain is in either a hazy fog or sometimes a more care free state where nothing bothers you, though nothing makes you feel happy either. However, it's only a one time fix. You can't not-sleep yourself out of depression. One night is ok, but keep being sleep deprived and you start getting all the other issues of sleep deprivation, one of which is increased depression.

    6. Re:Dec 2013 Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possible source: http://www.pnas.org/content/ea.... Unfortunately paywalled.

      It's definitely from there, see http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6165/1418.3.full

  5. As bad as a night of drinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Staying up all night drinking? If in hindsight it still seems smart, you may have brain damage...

    but damn, was it fun? I'm asking.

    1. Re:As bad as a night of drinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I got laid, it was worth ever dead brain cell! Way to take one for the team!

    2. Re:As bad as a night of drinking? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Staying up all night drinking? If in hindsight it still seems smart, you may have brain damage...

      Tell me about it. By pulling a beer binge 1-2 times a week I got a nasty brain fog and couldn't think clearly during challenging tasks anymore (programming, schoolwork, etc). Also alcohol wrecks the quality of sleep, making the problem worse. Finally been able to curb that stupid addiction.

      but damn, was it fun? I'm asking.

      Yeah, there's always many sides to these things. It's really whether you ask from a doctor or a philosopher. Drinking can indeed be fun and relaxing too. And the truck driver gets his income by pulling the crazy all-nighters.

      I hope everyone could gain as clear mind as possible.

  6. now they tel me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    i hav ben workin ovr nights fer many years an it hasnt fected my inteligents one bit

  7. Well Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They hope their research will result in medicines that will help people working odd hours cope with the consequences of irregular sleep.

    That medicine exists today ... it's called "Oxycodone"... ;)

    1. Re:Well Duh! by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      More like Seroquel

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  8. Shift Diff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... so, they put laboratory mice on a wonky sleep schedule that mirrors that of shift workers.

    I hope the mice got shift diff pay...

  9. Sleep deprivation != shift work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work 2nds and I got plenty of sleep. I had black-out shades. I got to bed by 2 AM and slept in until 10 AM the next day. I was never sleep deprived, just morning deprived and I didn't really miss them that much.

    All night to "cram" for tests though, I only did that a few times and I can see how it might cause some brain damage. I doubt it killed 25% of anything though. Otherwise me and everybody I studied with probably wouldn't have graduated.

  10. No shit ! by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not all of us like to pull all-nighters.

    For some of us, our brains refuse to stop going overdrive until our mission / project is over.

    Since my college days, whenever I am in a mission for something, my brain kicks up to the overdrive, and even if I sleep, it still keep churning and churning, resulting in me having really lousy sleeps, with imageries of what I was doing, what I am going to do, what I ought be doing (some times they are " hints " from the sub-conscious) kept on flashing up in my dreams.

    For example: I may be in the middle of a very difficult and confusing debugging job.

    After non-stop eyeballing the codes, countless re-and re-re-running of the resulting compilations, I get tired and hit the sack.

    But in my dreams, images of the screens popping up, with texts (source code) scrolling up and down and sideways, with my "dream self" doing the "virtual debugging" inside my dreams.

    It's a goddamn fucking torture, man.

    That is why sometimes I rather pull an all-nighters to get the job done, rather than having those un-ending-loop of imagery invading my sleep.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:No shit ! by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      Agreed, if I have to pull an all-nighter, then someone else could be subject to permanent damage.

    2. Re:No shit ! by gargleblast · · Score: 4, Interesting

      with my "dream self" doing the "virtual debugging"

      Then there are the nights you do real debugging.

      I modified an overnight cron job that downloaded sales from and uploaded prices to shops. Woke up at 2AM thinking "that program will not work". Logged in remotely and looked over a plethora of failing jobs. Stopped them, edited the program, set it running again, watched it run for a while and then went back to bed. What had I remembered? Not putting a double-semicolon on a new entry in a case-esac statement.

    3. Re:No shit ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and even if I sleep, it still keep churning and churning

      I had the same issue, I found it was what I was eating and how I exercised. I stop eating anything with sugar, citric acid, or caffeine after 8. Try to eat before 7. With a bit of exercise. If I do that my body naturally falls into a sleep by 12:30 (usually 11:30). I wake up around 8-9 very refreshed and usually bang out whatever bug was killing me last night.

      You are not falling completely asleep. You are not getting past your dreaming state. So you brain is still jacked up.

      For me taking a tums at 11 is better than any sleeping pill. As I was getting acid reflux from eating fast food garbage.

      tl;dr Wind down. Its good for you.

    4. Re:No shit ! by advantis · · Score: 2

      My most infuriating experience was when I solved a problem I had at work, it compiled, it did everything it needed to do, but when I went to commit it to SVN I had no Internet. After a few attempts, I realised I was dreaming and I woke up. And I had to type all that again when I got into the office.

      --
      Question for religious people: where do unrepentant masochists go when they die?
    5. Re:No shit ! by chihowa · · Score: 1

      I used to do that often as a kid. I would dream through a boring school-day in all it's tedious monotony and in excruciating detail... then wake up and find I had to do it all again. The last time it happened, the waking up and doing it a second time part was also just a dream and I went through that day three times. Thankfully, that was the last of that recurring dream sequence.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  11. In mice by EvilSS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Research Suggests Pulling All-Nighters Can Cause Permanent Damage in mice. The study was done on mice, not people. While it's an interesting first step, it is not in anyway conclusive that the results also apply to humans.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    1. Re:In mice by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      Wait! You're right! The study is seriously flawed! Mice already stay up all night; they're nocturnal by nature. So how could pulling "all-nighters" cause demonstrable brain damage in animals that have a natural predilection for so doing?

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    2. Re:In mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Research Suggests Pulling All-Nighters Can Cause Permanent Damage in mice. The study was done on mice, not people. While it's an interesting first step, it is not in anyway conclusive that the results also apply to humans.

      That begs the question, how did they deprive the sleep? Humans can give their cooperation, and deprive themselves of sleep for a study like this. For mice, you'd have to do it either chemically or what, poke them with a stick? Doesn't that need a control too?

    3. Re:In mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      How many mice do you see teaching at universities? Zero. That should be evidence enough that staying up all night causes brain damage.

  12. This is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It never said that the brain damage it gives you is as dramatic as you're making it out to be. It is actually miniscule damage. But that minuscule damage could cause very minor memory loss, such as forgetting one thing in a test or forgetting something on your shopping list.

    1. Re:This is true by sjames · · Score: 1

      Or it could be why so many elderly people suffer from sleep disorders.

  13. what about me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a night owl. My theory is Darwinian: a population with some members awake all night that act as guards has a higher survival value over another populace that all go to bed at the same time.

    The original post leads me to one of two possible conclusions:
    1. it is wrong
    2. when I was about 15 (I'm now 60+) I had to have had an IQ of around....(hmm, carry the 3, add..square root of 12...) well, 900.

    Explanation for subgenii: Since my current IQ is, well, not a problem, if pulling all-nighters causes brain damage I must have started off very high to end up where I am now.

    Further reading: Asylum, (1942) A.E. Von Vogt

    1. Re:what about me? by pipedwho · · Score: 1

      If a population had a few night owls that stood guard all night, there is no reason why those 'owls' couldn't have slept in the back of the cave during the day.

      Also, sleep deprivation may be less of an issue for those genetically inclined to need less sleep. Lack of sleep may take its toll in a different way than purely lowering the IQ of those participants. And clearly, for some, there may be no obvious issues at all. A slightly reduced life expectancy may be testable, but if something unrelated kills you first, you'll never know.

    2. Re: what about me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darwinian evolution does not describe group selection. Group selection is not a widely accepted theory of speciation because the genetic basis is still disputed.

      Basically, if you're a night owl it's probably because being a night owl was advantageous to one self and their direct descendants. Not because it improved the fitness of your group.

    3. Re: what about me? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Well yeah. The night owl was up on guard duty while Gronk The Mammoth-Chaser was doing his lumber mill impression in the back of the cave, and Gronk's wife, kept up by the snoring, wanted "someone to talk to."

  14. Ah! Dream Coding... by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    I remember dreaming at a keyboard, and when I snapped awake, I had found that I had typed words from my dream into my code. I decided that it was time to go home at that point.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re: Ah! Dream Coding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did it compile?

    2. Re:Ah! Dream Coding... by Kz · · Score: 1

      I remember dreaming at a keyboard, and when I snapped awake, I had found that I had typed words from my dream into my code. I decided that it was time to go home at that point.

      it's more embarrassing to dream-type the commit message and get just wake enough to do "git push" so everybody can see it. (real story, less than a week old)

      --
      -Kz-
    3. Re: Ah! Dream Coding... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Did it compile?

      That wasn't the kind of dream I was having.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:Ah! Dream Coding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was sleeping after pulling an allnighter in front of the computer. Someone woke me. I said "Enter Password:"

  15. Just like Nicotine/smoking by slew · · Score: 2

    I know some folks who like smoking so much that they dismiss any information that says it's bad for you because they don't want to believe it. Then again, some folks smoke until their 90s, never get emphysema, and eventually die of old age (knew one of them).

    I also know some folks who appear to be addicted to all-nighters (like a runner's high, they apparently get some sort of high from staying up too long)... Then again, most of them smoke too, so maybe there's some sort of correlation.

    Me, I'm not taking any chances on smoking or any unnecessary all-nighters. Sadly, unlike cigarettes, sometimes all-nighters are necessary (but not many).

    1. Re:Just like Nicotine/smoking by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Approximately one third of smokers never show symptoms related to smoking associated diseases. The rest die of lung cancer. No-one can predict which you'll be. The question is, how lucky do you feel?

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:Just like Nicotine/smoking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I know some folks who like smoking so much that they dismiss any information that says it's bad for you because they don't want to believe it."

      It has nothing to do with not wanting to believe it - they do believe it but theyve made the decision to take the risk anyway, which is their choice to make.

    3. Re:Just like Nicotine/smoking by slew · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with not wanting to believe it - they do believe it but theyve made the decision to take the risk anyway, which is their choice to make.

      I don't think you understand. They actually fundamentally really don't believe it. It's like cognitive dissonance you experience in your 20's when you think you are invincible and believe that you won't die because the rules don't apply to you... Some may tip their hats to said rules but still do not acknowledge that there is any risk at all *for them* because the rules don't apply to them (for some inexplicable reason). Think of this as a form of confirmation bias that is part of the human condition.

      It's just like teenagers having unprotected sex and then ending up pregnant or with AIDS. Such teenagers haven't (usually) made a conscious choice to take a risk, they honestly don't believe they can get pregnant or catch AIDS (for some inexplicable reason that probably wouldn't make any sense if you say it out loud). Of course the belief is misguided (and wrong), but it is their honestly true belief...

      It's just like global warming... *ducks* ;^}

  16. consequences for detainees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with previous posters that this is inconclusive and requires further investigation, which I hope to see. If this turns out to be true then it should lead to new outcries over the treatment of detainees such as those in Gitmo.

  17. Bullshit Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this even doing on slashdot? This is not science, this is nonsense

  18. It's like Doom on Ketamine, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's obvious,

    I myself, suffer from a massive condition called "Season Of Birth Disorder" which increases mental ill-health by 5% for those esp. born in between Jan-March (inc.) Of which sleep depravity is a large symptom thereof.
    I wouldn't mind but, well I used-to get told off for having the bedroom light on after 11PM.
    Whereas these days, what with so many 'discourse' websites - it all gets abit : hashtag-meta.

    Now into my 5th day with only 4 hours sleep , concurrently (meaning each day , I thunk) .. and frankly as far as Libido, I care not.
    Best part, I bought a Olympus DS-7000 & a dozen SD cards last summer - plus 120x blank A5 books, purely for this occasion. - just to see what 'corkers of ideas' the online Ted|videos will deliver.
    > my sincerest advise to anyone in this #noF**ksGiven, state : is to invest in a proper set of RS170 wireless headphones - just , if nothing else, for the chillOut distraction of otherwise learning , well, over- stimuli .

    1. Re:It's like Doom on Ketamine, though. by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      What?

  19. The blurb doesn't give enough for a discussion by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 1

    > anything that takes a small toll, may become measurable
    > in aggregate after a given number of occurrences.

    I think that's overly vague. Us animals have very resilient bodies. Our muscles get damaged during exercise but years of hard exercise doesn't wear our muscles away.

    The article itself (or at least the blurb) is sensationalist in its use of "brain damage".

    If I never did any all nighters, ok, maybe I would have avoided some "measurable" but insignificantly small amount of damage, but I would have failed some important exams and missed some project deadlines.

    Similarly, I won't be giving up drink just because some study says it's not good for the brain.

    1. Re:The blurb doesn't give enough for a discussion by careysub · · Score: 1

      > anything that takes a small toll, may become measurable > in aggregate after a given number of occurrences.

      I think that's overly vague. Us animals have very resilient bodies. Our muscles get damaged during exercise but years of hard exercise doesn't wear our muscles away.

      Ummm... years of hard exercise most definitely does cause permanent injury, Google "overuse injury" to see as many links on it at as you care to read. Athletes are forced to end careers all the time for this reason. And then there is Osteoarthritis which causes permanent disability due to bone damage from overuse.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    2. Re:The blurb doesn't give enough for a discussion by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 1

      I said muscles. You're talking about tendons. And your example is a corner case - most people who exercise never get tennis elbow. Even among those whose sport of choice is tennis!

    3. Re:The blurb doesn't give enough for a discussion by sjames · · Score: 1

      I think that's overly vague. Us animals have very resilient bodies. Our muscles get damaged during exercise but years of hard exercise doesn't wear our muscles away.

      But if you go too far over the line, you actually can exercise your way to rhabdomyolysis.

    4. Re:The blurb doesn't give enough for a discussion by pipedwho · · Score: 1

      Muscles are not necessarily damaged by small amounts of activity, but take them beyond their limits too often or too quickly and you get tears, strains and other indirect problems related to interconnects like bones and tendons. Sleep deprivation is not a typical activity and should be likened to overexertion or overuse.

      I agree the blurb is sensationalist in its claims, but the observations in the article are still valid within the domain in their claims of how sleep deprivation affects the mice they were testing.

    5. Re:The blurb doesn't give enough for a discussion by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 1

      Last I checked (a few years ago), the pretty much universally accepted theory of muscle growth is that muscle fibres suffer micro-tears during exercise, and these heal back slightly stronger than before. Bodybuilders inflict more micro-tears on their muscle fibres than other exercisers and then try to maximise nutrition, rest, and hormones afterwards to maximise the healing.

      The observations might be valid in some sense (e.g. not incorrect) but it looks to me like an insignificant finding that's been dressed up to get press attention. I mean, I don't think anyone was under the impression that all-nighters were somehow good for you, or even neutral. A good question would be how much damage they do, and more importantly, what nutrition or what should be done before or after an all-nighter to reduce the negative effects.

      This researcher's next shocking discovery will be that crossing the road carries a risk of death.

  20. Judging by this post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article is true! Really.

    People smoke their entire lives, no cancer. Others, bang, almost right away.

    Really? It's the damn probability that increases a LOT. It will never be 100%. Also, some(most?) cancers that start just die before anyone notices.
    I hope your parents brain doesn't get more damage, as he just referenced to science as superstition, and thinks his own beliefs and anedoctan evidence is better. The article claims brain damage. That doesn't have to be very critical brain damage. Even very bad brain damage can heal very well. A relative of mine lost her ability to walk and speak. Now she walks almost normally, and speaks a little also.

  21. Don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I have understood correctly it might not have been very healthy for any animal to eat humans. Most other animals won't get all worked up and decide it's time to get rid of all tigers aroud their home turf, then gather as a mob and come hunting for you. I'm pretty certain humans have been vengefull bastards for a long, long time.

    1. Re: Don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But tigers didn't understand the "Tragedy of the Commons" and so here we are.

  22. The older I get the more it kills me by swb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The older I get (I'm 47), the more staying up late affects me. And by staying up late, I mean anything past about 11:30. Staying up after midnight literally makes me feel ill the next day -- my joints ache and I generally feel unwell.

    When I was in my 20s I had to make myself go to bed -- listening to the BBC at midnight was my usual routine, and getting up at 6-630 was no problem.

    1. Re:The older I get the more it kills me by Nivag064 · · Score: 1

      I'm 63 and I don't feel that unwell nor have joint pains if I get less than 4 hours sleep, except for feeling groggy and having aching eyes the first few minutes after waking in the morning. Though I endeavour to get at least 6 hours a night. Now I try to get to sleep not much after 10pm, but I'm normally up & dressed by 7am most mornings regardless.

      There is enough research on humans, to suggest that adequate sleep is important for mental health for me to take it seriously. Similarly, for adequate exercise - I aim to get at least 1 hours fast walking every day on average, preferably up to 2 hours.

      If I a really pushing myself to learn new stuff or doing a lot of programming that is technically challenging or particularly frustrating, then I get tired earlier.

      In my early 40's I took over maintenance of a program generator which created another program that created SQL, written in a 4GL (PROGRESS 6, from memory). It was the most intense sustained mental effort I ever had in my career. I needed 2 extra hours of sleep most nights!

      However, different people get affected differently.

  23. "could" be a sign by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    I dunno, Mr Researcher Man, isn't it your job to SHOW that it's a sign of brain damage?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  24. anecdote=truth by hoboroadie · · Score: 0

    Science is always trying to catch up...
    to me.
    I figured out a long time ago, the sleep you miss is merely deducted from your lifespan. You can't get it back.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    1. Re:anecdote=truth by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't go as far as that, but considering that sleep is garbage collection, that a lot of living creatures risk their life every time they go "offline" to perform it, and that it's the only occasion for nerds to have satisfying interaction with the other sex (in their dreams, that is), I am sure treating sleep with RESPECT.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  25. cite your source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to hear more about the evidence that supports this discovery... what is the "energy" source you lose? Does this influence memory consolidation? What is the difference in sleep oscillations/brain waves during catch-up sleep compared to normal?

  26. Re:sounds implausible to you by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you are another one of the vast majority of folks who simply lack self awareness or perception. Try paying attention, for a change.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  27. It's a tradeoff... by gwstuff · · Score: 1

    It's no surprise that cutting down on sleep has negative effects. The short term effects have been evaluated experimentally - people without sleep are less capable of resisting junk food, irritable and less alert.

    The strange thing is that there's *never* been an attempt to characterize the advantages. I saw some notes in the posts above about experimenting with radios, listening to the BBC, etc. which are things that probably hone your mental abilities. If you pull all nighters studying to get into a good school and succeed, then you spend the next 4 years interacting with smart people and good professors.

  28. Permanent damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you're a mouse (according to the research so far).

  29. Huh. Really? by ninjagin · · Score: 1

    A couple of times a year, I stay up all through the night and go to work the next day. I find that it's not too disruptive, and that I get a bit more contemplative during the second day. It's not something I do on any kind of regular or planned basis -- it just sort of happens ... I can't sleep, so I read a book or futz around on the computer or mess with musical instruments and before I know it, dawn comes and it's time to go back to work. It's almost like one really long workday, with a really long lunch break (overnight) in the middle of it. I have to wonder what nurses and doctors (who sometimes have to work very long shifts) think about this.

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  30. This explains a lot by PPH · · Score: 1

    Posted by samzenpus on Thursday March 20, 2014 @12:32AM

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  31. Nice jump... by supertall · · Score: 1

    from "may" and "could" to "can."

  32. Cell reproduction by Twinbee · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    The discovery that long-term sleep loss can result in a loss of brain cells is a first, Veasey said. "No one really thought that the brain could be irreversibly injured from sleep loss," she said. That has now changed.

    I thought cells were constantly being reproduced in the human body. If so, I'm not so sure what so "irreversible" about the damage.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  33. I'm a night worker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been a night worker( NOC ) since 2009. When I first made the transition; I nearly went insane. I just couldn't sleep. Adapting took about a month. My social life was wrecked. Every "conceivable" way I viewed my life had changed; and not for the better( or so I thought ). Come 2014; I'm still on the night shift. I adapted. I re-invented my life because of it. I had to to be happy. Although I have changed departments; I'm still on the graveyard. It's tough. You ARE permanently sleep deprived. Nobody who works days TRULY gets it no matter how much they sympathize or empathize UNTIL they actually work it. As a bit of clincher statement; there is a positive. You won't have to experience any of the daytime politics. It's a refresher.

    On working nights; you do pay a price. Your tired or will be. The food choices suck at night. Weight gain is inevitable unless you commit to an exercise regimen. I chose to work nights to help meet my families needs. I do feel it has damaged me and continues to do so. However; I do it because I must. If you do have a choice; do your best to try to stay away from it. If you have to work the graveyard shift though; just remember, life doesn't end. If you have dreams and goals; just plan to make them come true using a different route. A salute to all of you night workers. You know how it goes? I worked last night. I have to go in tonight. I wish you all a pleasant rest if you can get it?

    A.B.

  34. That happens to you too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tossed and turned for many nights while I got my head around forth. I also have experienced the virtual debugging during sleep. I agree it is a weird feeling. It can bring results, but it is not pleasant as you don't seem to be in control of the process.

  35. The actual FA: Not "all nighters" by Keybounce · · Score: 1

    It's about strange sleep patterns.
    It's not about "All nighters".

    The article says:

    Veasey and her colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania medical school wanted to find out, so, they put laboratory mice on a wonky sleep schedule that mirrors that of shift workers.

    They let them snooze, then woke them up for short periods and for long ones.

    Then the scientists looked at their brains -- more specifically, at a bundle of nerve cells they say is associated with alertness and cognitive function, the locus coeruleus.

    They found damage and lots of it.

    ...

    This is how the scientists think it happened.

    When the mice lost a little sleep, nerve cells reacted by making more of a protein, called sirtuin type 3, to energize and protect them.

    But when losing sleep became a habit, that reaction shut down. After just a few days of "shift work" sleep, the cells start dying off at an accelerated pace.

    Yes, it's mice, not people. And yes, it says that once doesn't cause harm. It's after days of this that the protection mechanism shuts down.