Requirement of consent to contracts is a right deleniated by the social contract. The natural condition is doing whatever you want, like clubbing rolfwind's head in. A social structure creates the idea of respecting consent, not the other way around.
Dense fucking libertarians, trying to use their derived concepts as a basis for themselves.
Yeah, it sort of is. Rights, as we know them, are derived from the social contract, and withdrawal of one or more of those rights(such as freedom of movement) is necessary to preserve the benefits of the social contract to everyone else. It shouldn't be done unnecessarily(like this) or to unreasonable extremes(like removal of right not to be tortured), but protection of rights is done with the understanding that you won't use your rights to infringe the rights of others.
*You can make the argument that rights are natural or divine in origin, but that's an unprovable derail I'd prefer not to go down.
If not, then it's the same as an ex post facto law.
Restrictions on handling classified documents only apply to people who seek security clearance, which means some education is given on what "should be" classified to people who are handling it. Please understand, I think Radack should get off through jury nullification or something similar, but it's not identical to unconstitutional ex post facto laws.
In spite of how it's completely absurd given D&D is a game, your tone still reads like a manager describing how they had sex with some of their female employees by abusing their power. Tone is an odd thing.
It's actually because the espionage act defines things that "apparently should" be classified as protected under law too. It's a bad law, but it's not the same as ex post facto.
I feel like targeting that demographic with a new techy website is a plan that's doomed to failure. But I'm judgmental, and certainly am capable of being wrong.
It's nice looking, laid out a little different, and puts slightly different rules down, but fundamentally, it's a reddit clone. I don't like reddit, and I can't imagine this doing much better for me.
Yes, but life on this planet was also dependent on rather substantial influx of energy in the form of light. The adaptability of that life to numerous locations happened well after the "oxygen crisis".
Yeah, but under the lens of actual medical science it all falls apart.
From wikipedia
Many of Andraka's claims do not stand up to rigorous peer-reviewed research. For instance, a 2011 article published by Sharton et al. of the Laboratory of Molecular Biology at the NIH National Cancer Institute refutes many of Andraka's claims about specificity of using mesothelin as a biomarker for pancreatic cancer. Specifically, the group showed that mesothelin serum levels in healty donors 0.58 (0.15 – 0.72) nmol/l were not statistically different from serum levels in pancreatic cancer patients 0.66 (0.52 – 0.94) nmol/L.[15] In addition to this issue of false positives, George M. Church, professor of genetics at Harvard University, has raised concerns about the cost, speed, and sensitivity claims.[11]
Medical innovation comes from, get this, medical research. I'm not going to buy the fundamental credibility of someone who hasn't even necessarily seen the inside of a university, much less a medical school. If you see a "cold medicine invented by a teacher" altmed package at the checkout of a grocery store, you don't go "oh anyone could come up with something that works" you flip it over and see "*this statement not evaluated by the FDA" because it's bullshit.
Yeah, I think that's a fair conclusion, after reviewing their archives. It really has gotten worse.
Science category for 2013: here. Notable woo includes: *Could we speak the language of dolphins *Jessica Green: We're covered in germs. Let's design for that. *A promising test for pancreatic cancer... from a teenager.(Woop woop woop, red flag detected) *How a dead duck changed my life
Going back to 2003 here. The only item that draws my eye as bad is *Tierney Thys: Swim with the giant sunfish. (and it's possible that's not as bad as the name implies)
With plenty of legit topics like: *Life in the outer solar system *Birth of the computer *health and the human mind (...maybe) *The face of AIDS in Africa
Yeah, as much as I think criticism of Obamacare is overblown(and claims of success also overblown, it didn't fix pricing problems), being legally mandated to do something dangerous isn't good.
Slashdot Mirror
Requirement of consent to contracts is a right deleniated by the social contract. The natural condition is doing whatever you want, like clubbing rolfwind's head in. A social structure creates the idea of respecting consent, not the other way around.
Dense fucking libertarians, trying to use their derived concepts as a basis for themselves.
Ugh, read some goddamned John Locke. Depriving people of rights to continue a condition that allows rights is an inevitability, not just a choice.
Right, so what are prisons then? Proof that every single thing we call a right is secretly a privilege? I'm sorry they're not true Scotsmen.
Actually, you'll find that a lot of people breaking the law don't know it, and that ignorance is no excuse.
Yeah, it sort of is. Rights, as we know them, are derived from the social contract, and withdrawal of one or more of those rights(such as freedom of movement) is necessary to preserve the benefits of the social contract to everyone else. It shouldn't be done unnecessarily(like this) or to unreasonable extremes(like removal of right not to be tortured), but protection of rights is done with the understanding that you won't use your rights to infringe the rights of others.
*You can make the argument that rights are natural or divine in origin, but that's an unprovable derail I'd prefer not to go down.
If not, then it's the same as an ex post facto law.
Restrictions on handling classified documents only apply to people who seek security clearance, which means some education is given on what "should be" classified to people who are handling it. Please understand, I think Radack should get off through jury nullification or something similar, but it's not identical to unconstitutional ex post facto laws.
In spite of how it's completely absurd given D&D is a game, your tone still reads like a manager describing how they had sex with some of their female employees by abusing their power. Tone is an odd thing.
It's actually because the espionage act defines things that "apparently should" be classified as protected under law too. It's a bad law, but it's not the same as ex post facto.
You can discuss exceptions, but the reality is that red flags on pseudoscience are important for casual observations of this sort.
No government or unions involved at all=blame government and the unions because those are who I'm told to hate.
But it's not? It's a reddit clone?
I feel like targeting that demographic with a new techy website is a plan that's doomed to failure. But I'm judgmental, and certainly am capable of being wrong.
It's nice looking, laid out a little different, and puts slightly different rules down, but fundamentally, it's a reddit clone. I don't like reddit, and I can't imagine this doing much better for me.
Yes, but life on this planet was also dependent on rather substantial influx of energy in the form of light. The adaptability of that life to numerous locations happened well after the "oxygen crisis".
Yeah, but under the lens of actual medical science it all falls apart.
From wikipedia
Many of Andraka's claims do not stand up to rigorous peer-reviewed research. For instance, a 2011 article published by Sharton et al. of the Laboratory of Molecular Biology at the NIH National Cancer Institute refutes many of Andraka's claims about specificity of using mesothelin as a biomarker for pancreatic cancer. Specifically, the group showed that mesothelin serum levels in healty donors 0.58 (0.15 – 0.72) nmol/l were not statistically different from serum levels in pancreatic cancer patients 0.66 (0.52 – 0.94) nmol/L.[15] In addition to this issue of false positives, George M. Church, professor of genetics at Harvard University, has raised concerns about the cost, speed, and sensitivity claims.[11]
Medical innovation comes from, get this, medical research. I'm not going to buy the fundamental credibility of someone who hasn't even necessarily seen the inside of a university, much less a medical school. If you see a "cold medicine invented by a teacher" altmed package at the checkout of a grocery store, you don't go "oh anyone could come up with something that works" you flip it over and see "*this statement not evaluated by the FDA" because it's bullshit.
Eh, I can see the most loathsome terrible people in the universe getting a little ad-revenue out of store windows.
Yeah, I think that's a fair conclusion, after reviewing their archives. It really has gotten worse.
Science category for 2013: here. Notable woo includes: ... from a teenager.(Woop woop woop, red flag detected)
*Could we speak the language of dolphins
*Jessica Green: We're covered in germs. Let's design for that.
*A promising test for pancreatic cancer
*How a dead duck changed my life
Going back to 2003 here. The only item that draws my eye as bad is
*Tierney Thys: Swim with the giant sunfish. (and it's possible that's not as bad as the name implies)
With plenty of legit topics like:
*Life in the outer solar system
*Birth of the computer
*health and the human mind (...maybe)
*The face of AIDS in Africa
It's gotten worse.
TED is now basically full of pseudoscientific bullshit and ego-fueled self-promoters.
"Germs" typically refers to living things. Influenza is a virus.
I know this is a "funny"-because-I'm-intentionally-misunderstanding-science post, but sulfur hexafloride will totally help.
I'm not sure you understand what "propaganda" means.
Congratulations in living in a world of sanity.
Yeah, as much as I think criticism of Obamacare is overblown(and claims of success also overblown, it didn't fix pricing problems), being legally mandated to do something dangerous isn't good.
A treaty only guarantees extradition under specific conditions. Countries can still voluntarily extradite on serious charges(like, say, murder).