No, sorry. Many states require not just being informed, but also consent on the part of one or more parties involved in a 'wiretap'. The reason places you call get away with "this call may be monitored" is that the other party consents, and the most stringent interstate requirements require single-party consent.
When you're not in your car, you can't be the one granting consent.
I was about to get wooshed, and post something about how "web-scale" isn't any kind of meaningful standard, but then I thought better of it, looked it up, and found it's MongoDB's tagline.
I can only think of one database that isn't "webscale", and that's TinySQL, which I still use for personal web projects regardless.
Just let this possibility simmer, you can't actually be taken to court without a body of evidence in the first place, and you're dodging your real culpability by pretending that's the same as prosecuting poor-little-criminal-you for no reason.
They have Multi-GPU accelerated map reduced neural nets these days. And their comparative performance is amazingly fast, and cheap. You can even buy physical servers built for that exact function.
You don't need to "prove your innocence", dummy. There's a reason the plea is "not guilty." And a reason the phrase "beyond a reasonable doubt" is part of legal proceedings.
What's wrong here is that instead of "innocent until proven guilty" you want us to treat you as "innocent no matter what". I see no compelling reason to do that, and neither does the rest society. Which is why your contempt is punished.
Yes, you can in the US. It might be illegal, but so is tax evasion. Pick a remote locality without much enforcement. Build there using under the table labor.
Then in a few years, die in an electrical fire thanks to illegally poor wiring.
Uh, no, those are caused by not showing up, and showing up and being an ass, respectively. Both of which are illegal because flouting the court system undermines the ability of the government to enforce the law.
I fucking said you could garnish peoples' wages when it doesn't cause undue hardship. That's not the damn same as debt slavery, wherein you can face punitive actions for nonpayment.
In no way has any person ever been thrown in jail for nonpayment of alimony Mr. MRA McLieYourAssOff.
(I don't know about child support, but if you consider "taking care of your children" a debt, rather than a social duty, like not neglecting them is, well, I'm not sure we're going to find common ground ever).
Yeah, no. The argument I'm making is that this induces suffering for unreasonably small business gains. It doesn't have anything to do with rights, except inasmuch as there's an implied right not to be a slave to your creditor.
Except that some percentage of that increased value is going to pay for the devices being installed, and their management. And what they're changing, according to the summary is late payments, not non-payments. Meaning the amount of risk mitigation is on the order of a fraction of a percent.
Besides, that decrease in cost does little to handle the situation I described above. It only works if you buy into the neo-liberal notion that more liquidity in an economy always benefits all actors of that economy. I don't.
No it isn't. We made a relatively early decision in this country that debt slavery isn't acceptable, nor are debtors' prisons. We also decided you don't necessarily have full rights to your own money when you have an outstanding financial obligation, and that your wages can be legally garnished.
But we also have legal protections to insure that punitive and fiduciary measures don't create undue hardship. We have a pretty good system that does alright at balancing the risk-mitigating concerns of the creditor with the basic needs of the debtor, but in no way is failure to pay a debt actually illegal.
That fact doesn't even remotely justification the mindless advocation for it that the GP has. We don't need to have any Shylocks(and no, I'm not trying invoke the fact that he's Jewish) coming along for their pounds of flesh.
I'm glad the finance companies found a way to make "be late on your payment, while you scrounge up money" a worse option for the poor than "let your family starve while you scrounge up money".:-/
The thing about voxel raytracing is that it usually requires less fancy programming and design work to get your graphics up to snuff.
Rasterization, while extremely efficient, requires layers upon layers of programming cleverness and hours of skillful modeling and texture creation to pull off a "photorealistic" look(let's be honest, it's not that good either). If you could just throw out all the lightmapping and the real-time-self shadowing hacks, and the ambient light simulation, and a bunch of other stuff that's cropped up over the years to make up for the fact that we're not raytracing, you might choose to.
Say what you want about the US(and there's plenty to say)
And you call this covering up US corruption? Look, bro, I know you need the US government to be evil and the worst thing ever, for whatever political beliefs you've got there, but frankly, most of the world is doing worse. We have a lot of really reliable and good institutions to help deal with corruption. We have plenty of problems too, but we're simply not under the evil tyranny your overextended teenage rebellion needs.
The fact that a lot of what you're saying here is also objectively wrong(Seriously Clinton "killing" stevens?) is kinda secondary to the fact that you're brewing up an image that's unhealthily paranoid in general.
Under totally ideal circumstances, how many hours of flight do you think a midsized glider could store in batteries? Just hypothetically. Keep in mind the more battery mass you add, the more power-draw it takes to keep it in the air. I suspect the answer is "quite a bit less than 8 hours".
Slashdot Mirror
They had the evidence. He refused to refute it. Judge determined there was no reason to conclude he wasn't guilty.
The end.
No, sorry. Many states require not just being informed, but also consent on the part of one or more parties involved in a 'wiretap'. The reason places you call get away with "this call may be monitored" is that the other party consents, and the most stringent interstate requirements require single-party consent.
When you're not in your car, you can't be the one granting consent.
I was about to get wooshed, and post something about how "web-scale" isn't any kind of meaningful standard, but then I thought better of it, looked it up, and found it's MongoDB's tagline.
I can only think of one database that isn't "webscale", and that's TinySQL, which I still use for personal web projects regardless.
Or...
Just let this possibility simmer, you can't actually be taken to court without a body of evidence in the first place, and you're dodging your real culpability by pretending that's the same as prosecuting poor-little-criminal-you for no reason.
Well, you know what they say, make a proof of concept first, then make it good later(only a few people ever bother to do this).
They have Multi-GPU accelerated map reduced neural nets these days. And their comparative performance is amazingly fast, and cheap. You can even buy physical servers built for that exact function.
You don't need to "prove your innocence", dummy. There's a reason the plea is "not guilty." And a reason the phrase "beyond a reasonable doubt" is part of legal proceedings.
What's wrong here is that instead of "innocent until proven guilty" you want us to treat you as "innocent no matter what". I see no compelling reason to do that, and neither does the rest society. Which is why your contempt is punished.
It'll certainly make things a little easier on the non-tax cheats who have to pay more to cover these assholes.
And that's water molecules not on earth, where our lovely biological organisms like to fuck with molecules.
Yes, you can in the US. It might be illegal, but so is tax evasion. Pick a remote locality without much enforcement. Build there using under the table labor.
Then in a few years, die in an electrical fire thanks to illegally poor wiring.
But A. this isn't the US with a 4th amendment, and B. There's nothing invasive about doing standard surveying work automatically.
Uh, no, those are caused by not showing up, and showing up and being an ass, respectively. Both of which are illegal because flouting the court system undermines the ability of the government to enforce the law.
I fucking said you could garnish peoples' wages when it doesn't cause undue hardship. That's not the damn same as debt slavery, wherein you can face punitive actions for nonpayment.
In no way has any person ever been thrown in jail for nonpayment of alimony Mr. MRA McLieYourAssOff.
(I don't know about child support, but if you consider "taking care of your children" a debt, rather than a social duty, like not neglecting them is, well, I'm not sure we're going to find common ground ever).
Systemic problems of that sort also exist.
I am, in no way, endorsing this company. Just that overall level visual impressiveness might not be the primary target.
Yeah, no. The argument I'm making is that this induces suffering for unreasonably small business gains. It doesn't have anything to do with rights, except inasmuch as there's an implied right not to be a slave to your creditor.
Except that some percentage of that increased value is going to pay for the devices being installed, and their management. And what they're changing, according to the summary is late payments, not non-payments. Meaning the amount of risk mitigation is on the order of a fraction of a percent.
Besides, that decrease in cost does little to handle the situation I described above. It only works if you buy into the neo-liberal notion that more liquidity in an economy always benefits all actors of that economy. I don't.
No it isn't. We made a relatively early decision in this country that debt slavery isn't acceptable, nor are debtors' prisons. We also decided you don't necessarily have full rights to your own money when you have an outstanding financial obligation, and that your wages can be legally garnished.
But we also have legal protections to insure that punitive and fiduciary measures don't create undue hardship. We have a pretty good system that does alright at balancing the risk-mitigating concerns of the creditor with the basic needs of the debtor, but in no way is failure to pay a debt actually illegal.
That fact doesn't even remotely justification the mindless advocation for it that the GP has. We don't need to have any Shylocks(and no, I'm not trying invoke the fact that he's Jewish) coming along for their pounds of flesh.
Duh, more gpu cores.
I'm glad the finance companies found a way to make "be late on your payment, while you scrounge up money" a worse option for the poor than "let your family starve while you scrounge up money". :-/
The thing about voxel raytracing is that it usually requires less fancy programming and design work to get your graphics up to snuff.
Rasterization, while extremely efficient, requires layers upon layers of programming cleverness and hours of skillful modeling and texture creation to pull off a "photorealistic" look(let's be honest, it's not that good either). If you could just throw out all the lightmapping and the real-time-self shadowing hacks, and the ambient light simulation, and a bunch of other stuff that's cropped up over the years to make up for the fact that we're not raytracing, you might choose to.
No. And I suspect slashdot won't let me submit a 3 character response.
Nice. I love being proven wrong in ways that show promise for the world. Makes me happy.
Say what you want about the US(and there's plenty to say)
And you call this covering up US corruption? Look, bro, I know you need the US government to be evil and the worst thing ever, for whatever political beliefs you've got there, but frankly, most of the world is doing worse. We have a lot of really reliable and good institutions to help deal with corruption. We have plenty of problems too, but we're simply not under the evil tyranny your overextended teenage rebellion needs.
The fact that a lot of what you're saying here is also objectively wrong(Seriously Clinton "killing" stevens?) is kinda secondary to the fact that you're brewing up an image that's unhealthily paranoid in general.
Under totally ideal circumstances, how many hours of flight do you think a midsized glider could store in batteries? Just hypothetically. Keep in mind the more battery mass you add, the more power-draw it takes to keep it in the air. I suspect the answer is "quite a bit less than 8 hours".