Did you bother to note the rather important fact that none of our modern crop foods were alive during that time period. Adaptation of plant and animal life to major geologic changes doesn't happen in a century.
The problem we face isn't one of extinction of life on earth, but the inviability of meta-stable ecosystems we and our economies rely on.
So to bring it around, what does that have to do with this specific observation in the article, because I can't quite bridge that connection in my head.
I'm sorry, I don't see how "you get better at a job with practice" supports the original thesis. That's so normal for any profession that it almost represents the antithesis of the original argument.
"Someone disagrees with me, to the absurd bullshitmobile"
Demonstrating your ignorance about how cults operate, in order to draw a false parallel, just continues to reflect how unstuck in reality your positions are.
And let's be clear here, people disagree with you because your beliefs are straight up antithetical to observable reality. This is a relatively simple case of you being wrong. You could choose to be not completely wrong, but, for reasons completely beyond me, being scientifically wrong is important to you.
What if those galaxies are proof of symetry, and they're some of the few that are made of both matter and anti-matter, and the high energy ejections we're seeing are from that collision. Maybe half the galaxies in the sky are made of anti-matter and the non-particle-scale properties of antimatter are otherwise identical to matter.
Maybe. Cults are a little different, and I'm wary of people who use the term too freely.
There's a lot of social manipulation built into the structure of cults. You know things like "ostracize those who speak to outsiders", "venerate central personality who makes all decisions", or "target and harass ex-members".
Identity politics aren't new and unique to climate change denialism, and treating that as the most identifiable aspect of cults misses the real damage actual cults do to people.
A fun thing about reversing climate change, pointed out by a climatologist in an article I recently read.
If we cut new human emissions to zero, and found a way to stop the methane emissions from thawing permafrost and other positive feedback loops, historical evidence indicates that it might take a century or so for the planet's natural CO2 regulation methods to actually return to postindustrial levels.
I mean, that'd be fine, because our situation today isn't broadly disastrous like another 4-5 degrees C would be. But there's good reason to be concerned about the actual target stabilization temperatures of the plans we're not even implementing yet.
No, really. You can see the actual spin in this very thread. They are starting to form a basic premise of "freedom of speech" being killed by these pesky "libel" laws(and judges who are now also in on the conspiracy).
The oil companies/heartland institute don't have to create spin anymore, because they've had the most important success possible: making denialism an important part of the identity of a lot of people.
There is not a soul who was babbling about this "scandal" when it "broke" who will take this ruling as cause for reconsideration. And that's the big success.
I'm pretty sure what everyone actually wants is to be a successful indie dev, like Notch.
It's not hard to recognize that video games is an overcrowded field, and jumping into it, on either "side", isn't an economically smart decision, but people choose to become artists and musicians too, because it's their dream. Some are going to succeed, even.
No, they've just discovered EMRs for the first time. Medicine is a science, and, to quote mythbusters, the difference between science and goofing off is writing things down.
Yeah, but you don't know how much money middlemen are sucking up in the US.
Luckily, at least there's a maximum of 20% going to your insurer's profit these days, but hospitals ownership/management, outsourced payment systems, ambulance service contractors: they're still all making money at unspecified rates(and I guess doctors make a little more than their Canadian counterparts).
Privatization is a mistake. It's just a way of incorporating someone's (sometimes obscenely disproportionate) profit into the cost of getting things done.
Slashdot Mirror
Did you bother to note the rather important fact that none of our modern crop foods were alive during that time period. Adaptation of plant and animal life to major geologic changes doesn't happen in a century.
The problem we face isn't one of extinction of life on earth, but the inviability of meta-stable ecosystems we and our economies rely on.
No, we're definitely looking at 2-3 degrees C at least. Which is going to suck in a bunch of ways.
So to bring it around, what does that have to do with this specific observation in the article, because I can't quite bridge that connection in my head.
I get it. Not being as half stupid as you is the same as living in Jonestown. It's not a complicated idea you're articulating.
Plants are not the primary living consumers of CO2 on this planet. That'd be ocean-borne algae.
I'm sorry, I don't see how "you get better at a job with practice" supports the original thesis. That's so normal for any profession that it almost represents the antithesis of the original argument.
Oh, also, do consider this ruling cause to reconsider your positions?
Since you're the first denier to reply in this thread, it's an important test case for my hypothesis.
"Someone disagrees with me, to the absurd bullshitmobile"
Demonstrating your ignorance about how cults operate, in order to draw a false parallel, just continues to reflect how unstuck in reality your positions are.
And let's be clear here, people disagree with you because your beliefs are straight up antithetical to observable reality. This is a relatively simple case of you being wrong. You could choose to be not completely wrong, but, for reasons completely beyond me, being scientifically wrong is important to you.
I have an idea backed only by my imagination.
What if those galaxies are proof of symetry, and they're some of the few that are made of both matter and anti-matter, and the high energy ejections we're seeing are from that collision. Maybe half the galaxies in the sky are made of anti-matter and the non-particle-scale properties of antimatter are otherwise identical to matter.
Maybe. Cults are a little different, and I'm wary of people who use the term too freely.
There's a lot of social manipulation built into the structure of cults. You know things like "ostracize those who speak to outsiders", "venerate central personality who makes all decisions", or "target and harass ex-members".
Identity politics aren't new and unique to climate change denialism, and treating that as the most identifiable aspect of cults misses the real damage actual cults do to people.
You're like an old man whining about nail guns(because what are those new kids going to do when they can't use a nail gun for a particular job).
Oh right, WYSIWYG like COBOL, riiiiiiiiight.
And lots of people are using IDEs. Far more than were ever being used it the times the author the article is wishing for.
A fun thing about reversing climate change, pointed out by a climatologist in an article I recently read.
If we cut new human emissions to zero, and found a way to stop the methane emissions from thawing permafrost and other positive feedback loops, historical evidence indicates that it might take a century or so for the planet's natural CO2 regulation methods to actually return to postindustrial levels.
I mean, that'd be fine, because our situation today isn't broadly disastrous like another 4-5 degrees C would be. But there's good reason to be concerned about the actual target stabilization temperatures of the plans we're not even implementing yet.
No, it isn't.
Tools are simpler and easier to use than ever, and this guy is mistaking nostalgia and innocence for actual difference.
No, really. You can see the actual spin in this very thread. They are starting to form a basic premise of "freedom of speech" being killed by these pesky "libel" laws(and judges who are now also in on the conspiracy).
The oil companies/heartland institute don't have to create spin anymore, because they've had the most important success possible: making denialism an important part of the identity of a lot of people.
There is not a soul who was babbling about this "scandal" when it "broke" who will take this ruling as cause for reconsideration. And that's the big success.
Oh my, he did something ethically ambiguous, that must be the same thing as being an enemy.
Your biting insight totally destroys the fact that the majority of American citizens appreciate the knowledge of being unethically spied on.
I'm sure your appallingly simplistic worldview can help us with other challenges. Please guide us.
Or for a reason why every other entertainment industry profession in California(whose Hollywood friendly laws EA was exploiting) is unionized.
I'm pretty sure what everyone actually wants is to be a successful indie dev, like Notch.
It's not hard to recognize that video games is an overcrowded field, and jumping into it, on either "side", isn't an economically smart decision, but people choose to become artists and musicians too, because it's their dream. Some are going to succeed, even.
trove
noun \trv\
Definition of TROVE
1
: discovery, find
2
: a valuable collection : treasure; also : haul, collection
No adjective record in the dictionary.
Snowden had the decency to alert his own people to abuses, rather than just foreign governments?
No, they've just discovered EMRs for the first time. Medicine is a science, and, to quote mythbusters, the difference between science and goofing off is writing things down.
Yeah, but you don't know how much money middlemen are sucking up in the US.
Luckily, at least there's a maximum of 20% going to your insurer's profit these days, but hospitals ownership/management, outsourced payment systems, ambulance service contractors: they're still all making money at unspecified rates(and I guess doctors make a little more than their Canadian counterparts).
Oh no, medical charts are useful and informative these days. You might not die! Scary!
(I get your concern, but come on, do you really want your doctor to not have access to your medical history?)
But since this is a corporate bullshit decision, you should probably hold their bullshit corporate owners responsible.
But if well-deserved hate had any effect on that particular company, I'm pretty sure we would've noticed by now.
Privatization is a mistake. It's just a way of incorporating someone's (sometimes obscenely disproportionate) profit into the cost of getting things done.