My vote goes to EV1Servers.net. It looks to me like EV1 blindly ran into a trap. By paying SCO money they have also shown that they believe SCO's allegations actually have merit.
What's to stop SCO from revoking their EULA based on the binary-only clause and then sueing EV1 for IP infringement? IMO, they might actually win such a case.
Slashdot Mirror
My vote goes to EV1Servers.net. It looks to me like EV1 blindly ran into a trap. By paying SCO money they have also shown that they believe SCO's allegations actually have merit. What's to stop SCO from revoking their EULA based on the binary-only clause and then sueing EV1 for IP infringement? IMO, they might actually win such a case.