Getting sued and losing a lawsuit is "almost" the same in many cases. Even after winning the lawsuit, you are out of an important amount of money in attorney fees.
Until the losing party pays for the defense costs of the winning party, the comment you are replying to is more accurate than your reply.
Your papa might have needed better Spanish classes. None of the meanings of those words can be expressed with "Justicia"
- Justification: Depending on the context, it can be expressed by "justificación", "motivación", and a few more.
- Righteousness: Probably the most appropriate translation would be "rectitud"; other may apply depending on the topic.
In summary... Not a limitation of the tool (the language) but of the user. And please, do not take me wrong: your dad certainly had to master Spanish to be working in these countries.
Can anybody explain to me how does this statement agrees with the Law of Conservation of Momentum?
I can't see how a piece of the ISS can overcome the ship or somehow get away from it but come back and hit the hull.
Only an impact may -in my limited knowledge- explain this. Does anybody else have another explanation?
P+
Slashdot Mirror
Getting sued and losing a lawsuit is "almost" the same in many cases. Even after winning the lawsuit, you are out of an important amount of money in attorney fees.
Until the losing party pays for the defense costs of the winning party, the comment you are replying to is more accurate than your reply.
Your papa might have needed better Spanish classes. None of the meanings of those words can be expressed with "Justicia"
- Justification: Depending on the context, it can be expressed by "justificación", "motivación", and a few more.
- Righteousness: Probably the most appropriate translation would be "rectitud"; other may apply depending on the topic.
In summary... Not a limitation of the tool (the language) but of the user. And please, do not take me wrong: your dad certainly had to master Spanish to be working in these countries.
The Spaniard
Like the airlines think Saftey, Saftey, Saftey - Microsoft need to adopt the slogan.. Security Security Security
Shouldn't the slogan say Secruity Secruity Secruity?
It reminded me of the term analogies test.
No, I do not have a sig.
Perhaps, but no link is given and nothing in eWeek.com is mentioned.
Can anybody explain to me how does this statement agrees with the Law of Conservation of Momentum? I can't see how a piece of the ISS can overcome the ship or somehow get away from it but come back and hit the hull. Only an impact may -in my limited knowledge- explain this. Does anybody else have another explanation? P+