And what keeps track of the synchronisation between all these wonderfull links ? At some point the data must be used and processed in a useful manner. Otherwise the article would be "There is no limit to how much data can be processed by an unlimited number of computers".
RTFA.
Transfer data. Yes, TRANSFER. I think they were saying that you couldnt get the data to your super quick storage mechanism fast enough.
I think the human brain will hit a wall with how much porn it can process before this limit is reached.
With the possible exception of the/. readership.
I suspect this has more to do with complying with the law than a desire to become more green. EU law requires Pb use to be reduced imminently. If they really wanted to become more green then power consumption would be a more profitable place to start. As would reducing the evil chemicals (and power) used in manufacture.
Its a bit strange, because I understood exactly what he was trying to say. Admittedly the terminology was somewhat unconventional, but the point was good. On the other hand, your post indicated nothing useful whatsoever. Go and do a google search for "I am an Idiot". I dont know what will show up, but at least you'll get some practise typing it.
Slashdot Mirror
And what keeps track of the synchronisation between all these wonderfull links ? At some point the data must be used and processed in a useful manner. Otherwise the article would be "There is no limit to how much data can be processed by an unlimited number of computers".
RTFA. Transfer data. Yes, TRANSFER. I think they were saying that you couldnt get the data to your super quick storage mechanism fast enough. I think the human brain will hit a wall with how much porn it can process before this limit is reached. With the possible exception of the /. readership.
I suspect this has more to do with complying with the law than a desire to become more green. EU law requires Pb use to be reduced imminently. If they really wanted to become more green then power consumption would be a more profitable place to start. As would reducing the evil chemicals (and power) used in manufacture.
Its a bit strange, because I understood exactly what he was trying to say. Admittedly the terminology was somewhat unconventional, but the point was good. On the other hand, your post indicated nothing useful whatsoever. Go and do a google search for "I am an Idiot". I dont know what will show up, but at least you'll get some practise typing it.