The right question is, "What can I do to remember to download it every month?"
What if you find a bank that has a current policy of letting you download 5 years' of history, you forget for 4 years, and they change policy to three months?
Or what if you do nothing for four years, decide to switch banks for some other equally trivial reason, forget to download even then, and then a year later need it?
You need some idiotic little reminder, a cron job if nothing else, to do it once a month. That's the real solution.
Or maybe you need to decide the data isn't really very important after all, if you can't oblige yourself by downloading once a month and don't actually use it.
That's pretty funny, saying that it's ok for you to tell other people how to spend their money but not ok for me to tell you that isn't any of your business. Tell me when the great Eurasion war is over, will ya?
The funniest aspect is how she was a birther and possibly a truther, and had many other kook positions, during the primary, but when she won that, those parts of her campaign disappeared from her website... until Harry Reid posted them on *his* website, and she objected that he was distorting her positions. I think she actually sued or filed a complaint with the FEC. A real nutter. I think she'd be pretty harmless in the Senate, being much too kooky to be effective and trustworthy. She's good at making noise, not much else.
Did you RTFA? No, of course not. They claim they have a good business plan. What's more, it's none of your or the damned government's business to judge their business plan, it is their investors' money, and if they want to throw it away, it is, literally, THEIR business.
And if you don't like watching ads, don't. But it's none of your business, again literally, if others do, or even whether others do.
Nice example that you wanted him to use -- the one that was shown to NOT be what the news made it out to be. Are you trying to trick him into making a false anecdote to buttress his claim, thereby giving you reason to laugh at him for that?
You do realize that the old phone system was a government granted monopoly because they (the government) felt it was a waste to have multiple companies running lines in parallel, right? Competition was alive and well until the government handed AT&T a monopoly and said "It's all yours"
Uhh, no. AT&T gobbled up all the competition thru jackassery and then begged the government to regulate it to keep it from having to pay the piper. Please learn history before you spout it wrongly.
Bah. The rights wingers want big business to control big government, and the left wing wants big government to control big business. Neither of them has any faith in individual power.
The "right wingers" want nothing of the sort. What we want is for the government to get the hell out of the way and stop taxing and regulating business to the point that makes it impossible to even run a business unless you're a huge corporation. We want the federal government to be as small as possible.
I wonder what the old phone system would be like if it hadn't had common carrier net neutrality status, or roads, or railroads, or airplanes. In fact, I wonder about so-called business-friendly conservatives who think it's perfectly hunky dory to have racism in publicly accessible businesses. Can they even imagine a world where every single place you went, every single thing you did, was subject to a zillion different whims? Oh, no, don't shop there, the owner hates left handed people, red headed people, people taller than him....
The whole point of all these laws, from anti-racism to net neutrality, is to level the playing ground. These so-called business-friendly nincompoops can't think past the end of their noses, that fragmenting life like that would send the economy back to the stone ages.
Aside from the basic fairness of it all, of course. But from the pragmatic point of view, they are short sighted beyond belief.
Bah. The rights wingers want big business to control big government, and the left wing wants big government to control big business. Neither of them has any faith in individual power.
Slashdot Mirror
33 bits = 8 hex digits + 1 bit.
I hope not, if that's the best you can do. There's *33* digits to cut in half.
Well, maybe it's floating point.
"Things"? What do you mean? They are going to lock my account to their store? Or my Android phone that I didn't buy from them?
The right question is, "What can I do to remember to download it every month?"
What if you find a bank that has a current policy of letting you download 5 years' of history, you forget for 4 years, and they change policy to three months?
Or what if you do nothing for four years, decide to switch banks for some other equally trivial reason, forget to download even then, and then a year later need it?
You need some idiotic little reminder, a cron job if nothing else, to do it once a month. That's the real solution.
Or maybe you need to decide the data isn't really very important after all, if you can't oblige yourself by downloading once a month and don't actually use it.
I like the way you think. Please forward details on how to subscribe to your newsletter.
Is THAT what the big fat idiot is funding? Too late!
So the proper car analogy is to lock your glove box inside your locked car inside your locked garage in your gated community with the locked gate?
Thank you, thank you. I'll be here all week.
Please, no. Brevity is the soul of wit. Don't let the sole of my shoe hit you on the way out the door.
How would you baptise an octopus? Raise it out of the water? Sprinkle holy air on it?
It is not insignificant, those two first initials, methinks. Are you perchance leaving a clue for us, hmmm?
That's pretty funny, saying that it's ok for you to tell other people how to spend their money but not ok for me to tell you that isn't any of your business. Tell me when the great Eurasion war is over, will ya?
The funniest aspect is how she was a birther and possibly a truther, and had many other kook positions, during the primary, but when she won that, those parts of her campaign disappeared from her website ... until Harry Reid posted them on *his* website, and she objected that he was distorting her positions. I think she actually sued or filed a complaint with the FEC. A real nutter. I think she'd be pretty harmless in the Senate, being much too kooky to be effective and trustworthy. She's good at making noise, not much else.
Did you RTFA? No, of course not. They claim they have a good business plan. What's more, it's none of your or the damned government's business to judge their business plan, it is their investors' money, and if they want to throw it away, it is, literally, THEIR business.
And if you don't like watching ads, don't. But it's none of your business, again literally, if others do, or even whether others do.
You do not RC. MRAM is magnetic, nothing like memresistors.
If the byproduct of a hydrogen fire is water, does it put itself out?
Does water do any good? The spray can both cool fire and reduce oxygen, but how does that work on a hydrogen fire?
Only half :-)
Maybe he did, maybe he didn't.
Rather than millions of people changing names to please society, society will change because those millions of people *are* the next society.
This is stimulating conversation. I wish to subscribe to your newsletter. Do you have a stimulating contact address?
Oh hell, I left the page loaded too long before adding my comment and didn't see the 17 minute earlier comment.
Did Someone In Authority(tm) tell his minions to crack down on Wikileaks, and one of the minions confused them with Wikipedia?
Nice example that you wanted him to use -- the one that was shown to NOT be what the news made it out to be. Are you trying to trick him into making a false anecdote to buttress his claim, thereby giving you reason to laugh at him for that?
Net neutrality has nothing in common with deregulation other than that bogey word "regulate".
Net neutrality is common carrier status, you can't discriminate on who uses your service, etc.
Airline deregulation meant the government no longer had much say over business plans, pricing, scheduling, etc.
You do realize that the old phone system was a government granted monopoly because they (the government) felt it was a waste to have multiple companies running lines in parallel, right? Competition was alive and well until the government handed AT&T a monopoly and said "It's all yours"
Uhh, no. AT&T gobbled up all the competition thru jackassery and then begged the government to regulate it to keep it from having to pay the piper. Please learn history before you spout it wrongly.
Bah. The rights wingers want big business to control big government, and the left wing wants big government to control big business. Neither of them has any faith in individual power.
The "right wingers" want nothing of the sort. What we want is for the government to get the hell out of the way and stop taxing and regulating business to the point that makes it impossible to even run a business unless you're a huge corporation. We want the federal government to be as small as possible.
Thank you for proving my point.
I wonder what the old phone system would be like if it hadn't had common carrier net neutrality status, or roads, or railroads, or airplanes. In fact, I wonder about so-called business-friendly conservatives who think it's perfectly hunky dory to have racism in publicly accessible businesses. Can they even imagine a world where every single place you went, every single thing you did, was subject to a zillion different whims? Oh, no, don't shop there, the owner hates left handed people, red headed people, people taller than him ....
The whole point of all these laws, from anti-racism to net neutrality, is to level the playing ground. These so-called business-friendly nincompoops can't think past the end of their noses, that fragmenting life like that would send the economy back to the stone ages.
Aside from the basic fairness of it all, of course. But from the pragmatic point of view, they are short sighted beyond belief.
Bah. The rights wingers want big business to control big government, and the left wing wants big government to control big business. Neither of them has any faith in individual power.
You appear to be making a defamatory pun on the word defenestraion". Our lawyers will be getting in touch.