Slashdot Mirror


Outlook Plug-In Keeps Tone of Your Email In Check

Meshach writes "A new plug-in for Outlook will warn you if an email you are about to send is 'too emotional.' Basically the plug-in scans the email for emotions such as elation, humiliation, excitement and fear. A user can set how much emotion they want to allow in their messages and if exceeded the threshold a warning will pop up."

119 comments

  1. Elation? by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    WARNING: Outlook detected the phrase "full on double rainbow" as a modifying adjective in your e-mail and would like to remind you that this dangerously exceeds your predetermined threshold for elation and happiness. Outlook suggests taking one step down the elation scale and changing the phrase "Dude, last night that hooker was full on double rainbow!" to "Dude, last night that hooker was titties!" Yes/No?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Elation? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      I'd settle for an e-mail program that just strips out the emoticons and LOLz and makes people write like someone writing, and not like someone writing while simultaneously trying to communicate body language.

      Oh, and while you're at it, can you make it so the program pokes the writer in the eye every time he writes the words "win" and/or "fail" in all caps? Thanks.

    2. Re:Elation? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and while you're at it, can you make it so the program pokes the writer in the eye every time he writes the words "win" and/or "fail" in all caps? Thanks.

      Or any use of the word "epic" without reference to history.

      And sentences of the form "adjective noun is adjective".

      In short, a fad phrase filter.
      I wonder whether it's better implemented on the sending end, or the receiving end, as part of spam filtering. I might conceivably want to read an e-mail from someone saying "Genitorturers is win. Got 2 tickets lulz, can't go criez. Broken leg is broken. Want tickets?", despite the immediate pain reading it causes.

    3. Re:Elation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG like that is SUCH a good idea lol!

    4. Re:Elation? by tsa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't even want to be friends with someone who writes like that.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    5. Re:Elation? by RivenAleem · · Score: 2, Funny

      Disallowing *ouch* use of "win" *ouch* would only lead to brewing *ouch* discomfort and dwindling *ouch* friendship following *ouch* shortly thereafter with growing *ouch* tension among your peers

    6. Re:Elation? by ameline · · Score: 1

      > Oh, and while you're at it, can you make it so the program pokes the writer in the eye every time he writes the words "win" and/or "fail" in all caps? Thanks.

      THIS :-)

      --
      Ian Ameline
    7. Re:Elation? by morari · · Score: 1

      ur comment iz teh FAIL!

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    8. Re:Elation? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      "Genitorturers is win. Got 2 tickets lulz, can't go criez. Broken leg is broken. Want tickets?", despite the immediate pain reading it causes.

      As a Genitorturers fan shouldn't you enjoy the pain?

      (I've seen the band, I didn't enjoy the BDSM displays.)

    9. Re:Elation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. You are the best filter. Choose quality friends and you won't have to concern yourself with it.

      Personally, I can't stand people who write that way ("epic", "win", "fail", "lolz", "can I haz cheesburger" and other faux baby talk, etc.) either. The only consolation is that it helps to weed out quite a number of the idiots upon sight.

    10. Re:Elation? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't even want to be friends with someone who writes like that.

      Me either, but I'd be happy to take their tickets.

    11. Re:Elation? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      As a Genitorturers fan shouldn't you enjoy the pain?

      (I've seen the band, I didn't enjoy the BDSM displays.)

      Much like Rammstein live (their "Bueck Dich" stage performance springs to mind), you have to see it as an outrageous freak show. Unlike certain punk bands, they won't really subject the audience to real body fluids or harm, but yeah, it's transgressive art, and as such shouldn't be to most people's liking.

    12. Re:Elation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really hate it that much, don't email people who talk like that. LOL!

    13. Re:Elation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry; nobody wants to be friends with such a pretentious twat as yourself.

    14. Re:Elation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when has having a sense of self worth and good judgment meant that one was pretentious? Oh, that's right, it only does in your narrow little world of captioned cat pictures and simpleton humour.

      I'd rather have ten intelligent people as friends than a hundred drooling morons like you.

    15. Re:Elation? by Sinesurfer · · Score: 1

      It's sad how many people have that attitude until they mature past their teenage years (that do not extend to their thirties).

      --
      Regards Sinesurfer A Nerd is someone who lives for technology, A Geek is someone who lives for technology and loves it
    16. Re:Elation? by plover · · Score: 1

      I'd settle for an e-mail program that just strips out the emoticons and LOLz and makes people write like someone writing, and not like someone writing while simultaneously trying to communicate body language.

      Oh, and while you're at it, can you make it so the program pokes the writer in the eye every time he writes the words "win" and/or "fail" in all caps? Thanks.

      I think a USB breathalyzer would accomplish much the same task...

      --
      John
    17. Re:Elation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...one was pretentious?

      checkmate

    18. Re:Elation? by riegel · · Score: 1

      Like I'd settle for like an e-mail program that like just strips out the like all the like emoticons and LOLz and like makes people write like someone like writing, and not like someone like writing while simultaneously trying to like communicate body language.

      --
      http://p8ste.com - Web based Clipboard
    19. Re:Elation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poke.

    20. Re:Elation? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I think a USB breathalyzer would accomplish much the same task...

      In the sense of "breath analyzer", yes ; but it'd have to look for a lot more than just plain old ethanol.

      [SIGH] which is exactly what my baggage gets put through whenever I go to work.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    21. Re:Elation? by plover · · Score: 1

      I have a buddy who wants his email postings from Saturday night delayed until Sunday evening, so he can take them all back after he sobers up.

      --
      John
  2. How it works... by Nick+Fel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Years of research went into language analysis software for this plug-in before an intern stumbled on the genius idea of simply counting the exclamation marks.

    1. Re:How it works... by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Years of research went into language analysis software for this plug-in before an intern stumbled on the genius idea of simply counting the exclamation marks.

      I CAN THINK OF ANOTHER CONTRIBUTING FACTOR THAT IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR AWESOME.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    2. Re:How it works... by somersault · · Score: 1

      Not to mention emotes.

      "Awww, sad smiley? WARNING! Sad smiley is sad."

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:How it works... by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      What I hate is when those bastards insert smiley-icons into code that I am emailing.

      No I do not want a winking-smiley face in the middle of a method declaration.

    4. Re:How it works... by SiaFhir · · Score: 5, Funny

      Years of research went into language analysis software for this plug-in before an intern stumbled on the genius idea of simply counting the exclamation marks.

      I CAN THINK OF ANOTHER CONTRIBUTING FACTOR THAT IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR AWESOME.

      IT COULD ALSO MEAN I'M PISSED OFF YOU INSENSITIVE CLOD.

    5. Re:How it works... by lysdexia · · Score: 1

      Oh quit being such an old sourpuss! Sounds like you have a case of the almost-Fridays! :-)

    6. Re:How it works... by Pawnn · · Score: 1

      What I hate is when those bastards insert smiley-icons into code that I am emailing.

      No I do not want a winking-smiley face in the middle of a method declaration.

      My mind's drawing a blank on why your code would have a semi-colon followed by a parenthesis. Can you give me an example?

    7. Re:How it works... by arth1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to mention emotes.

      No worries there. This is Outlook, and Outlook will replace all your :-) with J

    8. Re:How it works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years of research went into language analysis software for this plug-in before an intern stumbled on the genius idea of simply counting the exclamation marks.

      IT COULD ALSO MEAN I'M PISSED OFF YOU INSENSITIVE CLOD.

      OR BECAUSE I GOT MY TERMINAL BEFORE LOWER CASES WERE INVENTED.

    9. Re:How it works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for (;;)
      { // do shit
      }

    10. Re:How it works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for(int x=0; x3;){ /* ... */
      }

    11. Re:How it works... by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      LOUD NOISES!!!!

    12. Re:How it works... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      What I hate is when those bastards insert smiley-icons into code that I am emailing.

      You must not realize that you can disable that "feature" in both Lookout and Tbird.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    13. Re:How it works... by icebraining · · Score: 1

      "Multiple exclamation marks," he went on, shaking his head, "are a sure sign of a diseased mind." - Terry Pratchett, Eric

    14. Re:How it works... by somersault · · Score: 1

      Heh, this is true, unless you also happen to use Outlook, in which case you see a smiley

      --
      which is totally what she said
    15. Re:How it works... by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      AMATEURS.

      --DEATH

    16. Re:How it works... by riegel · · Score: 1

      Awseome, now if you could also tell me how to disable it in all the 100,000+ other websites and programs and im clients and and and... Then I will refrain from stating that it annoys me.

      --
      http://p8ste.com - Web based Clipboard
    17. Re:How it works... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Every web forum that I've visited has a "disable emoticons" check box, and the only IM client I use (Lotus SameTime, at work) lets you delete emoticons.

      So, stop whining and start looking...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    18. Re:How it works... by riegel · · Score: 1

      Sweet. I can disable em for myself, ... but how about the guy reading my code? Will it be disabled for him as he is reading it?

      --
      http://p8ste.com - Web based Clipboard
    19. Re:How it works... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      but how about the guy reading my code? Will it be disabled for him as he is reading it?

      It's interesting how you keep on "moving the goal"...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  3. Outborg? by KarrdeSW · · Score: 3, Informative

    We are Outlook. Lower your firewalls, and surrender your servers. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service ours. Resistance is futile.

    1. Re:Outborg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are Outlook. At least we aren't Lotus Notes

    2. Re:Outborg? by Abstrackt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Locutus Notes was even worse. It assimilated all my documents then put my computer to sleep.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  4. Old news by hcdejong · · Score: 0

    Eudora had this 10 years ago (then called 'MoodWatch'). Good to see Microsoft keeping up...

    1. Re:Old news by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Eudora had this 10 years ago (then called 'MoodWatch'). Good to see Microsoft keeping up...

      WARNING: Outlook has detected dangerously high levels of sarcasm in your post ...

      --
      My work here is dung.
    2. Re:Old news by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hi,

      This is a third party app. I doubt Microsoft would even care to make something this useless. But thanks for showing that you are clueless and so is the moderator.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:Old news by mr_da3m0n · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, I remember this. It would display small peppers or a flame (? Can't remember clearly) next to messages it thought were being harsh.

    4. Re:Old news by leonbloy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google and see peppers here

    5. Re:Old news by somersault · · Score: 1

      I doubt Microsoft would even care to make something this useless

      You mean something like.. Clippy?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:Old news by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Touche, Mr. Sault.... Touche!

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    7. Re:Old news by natehoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But integrating this with Clippy would be awesome!

      It looks like you're writing a death threat! I can help you with that. Would you like me to:
      >>> Track down the street address of the bastard you're going to kill and display it on Bing?
      >>> Recommend ways to kill the bastard and vendors who might carry the supplies you need nearby?
      >>> Tone down the note so the bastard doesn't see it coming?
      >>> Find a therapist nearby so you can develop a sentence-reducing sense of remorse after the killing?

      Optional Paid Services:
      >>> For a one-time fee of $12,000, I can appear on your victim's screen continuously, alter the contents of their documents and emails to look embarrassing, and generally act like MS-Office does, only more extreme, until your intended victim loses the will to live and commits suicide. Charge will appear on your credit card bill as "hookers and blow" so the police will be misled into charging you with a far lesser crime if they ever trace it to you, which is pretty much impossible anyway. Hook me up with some really good acid-free vellum (you know how us paperclips like nice paper!) and we can discuss a discount, but it's gotta be the good stuff, not the crappy vellum you buy at Staples.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    8. Re:Old news by snookerhog · · Score: 1
      LOL

      I forgot all about that feature in Eudora.

      Makes me want to fire it up again and reread all my flaming emails from 1995.

    9. Re:Old news by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1

      Peppers!

    10. Re:Old news by Abstrackt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Eudora had this 10 years ago (then called 'MoodWatch'). Good to see Microsoft keeping up...

      WARNING: Outlook has detected dangerously high levels of sarcasm in your post ...

      Oh, a sarcasm detector, that's a real useful invention.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    11. Re:Old news by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      i remember it too.... 10 years ago.

      Probably a reason why no email client has included this feature in 10 years....

      Wonder how long before Eudora sues?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    12. Re:Old news by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      IIRC it used peppers to indicate your message may be a little "Hot"

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    13. Re:Old news by The_Noid · · Score: 1

      Indeed, but more for some of the readers here than for the writer.

  5. Cool, now can they make a grammar checker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Cool, now can they make a grammar checker?

    I has had two much emails from grammar Natzi saying I can't write.

    1. Re:Cool, now can they make a grammar checker? by RobertLTux · · Score: 0

      the problem is no program could match the services of a good 4th grade teacher (or a good secretary).

      "I has had two much emails from grammar Natzi saying I can't write."

      i think what you meant to say is
      "I have had to many emails from grammar Nazis stating i can not write correctly."

      unless you had some other purpose...

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    2. Re:Cool, now can they make a grammar checker? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Don't let your shelf be lepton buy grammar Nazi.
      Ivy herd that aegis a indicator of no ledge, butt they or egg Sept tons.
      Aye can sea that you right quit well four sum won off yore generate ion.

    3. Re:Cool, now can they make a grammar checker? by SiaFhir · · Score: 1

      I has had two much emails from grammar Natzi saying I can't write.

      You mean you can't *right*. Get it write dood.

    4. Re:Cool, now can they make a grammar checker? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Do knot forge it too use spiel checker to catch simple miss steaks.

      That why people under stained you beater.

    5. Re:Cool, now can they make a grammar checker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This 'whooosh' is just for you. It's your very own, treat it well and you and the whooosh can be friends for a long time!

    6. Re:Cool, now can they make a grammar checker? by ajlitt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your message exceeds your Whoosh Factor.
      Would you like to...
      [Acquire Sense of Humor] [Cancel]

    7. Re:Cool, now can they make a grammar checker? by maxume · · Score: 1

      If your going to mingle the English, be doing it to excretion!

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Cool, now can they make a grammar checker? by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Aside from the WOOSH mentioned by the other posters, you also used "to" when you should have used "too".
      As much as I hate using net-slang, the only word I can say that describes your efforts here is FAIL.

      --
      I hate printers.
    9. Re:Cool, now can they make a grammar checker? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      well since i have a couple crates of refurbushed Woosh the whoosh on your part is that i knew it was a joke.

      and isn't a law of the GN that you will make at least one mistake when correcting someone??

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    10. Re:Cool, now can they make a grammar checker? by hviniciusg · · Score: 1
    11. Re:Cool, now can they make a grammar checker? by riegel · · Score: 1

      i think what you meant to say is "...grammar Nazis stating i can not...

      I think what you meant to do was CAPITOLIZE the letter i.

      I think you meant capitalize.

      This kind of recursion could co on forever, the only way to terminate it is to have a grammatically correct response, that is spelled correctly, with correct punctuation etc. and without runon sentences and also following all the correct rues of the queens english etc. etc. etc.

      Stop the madness.

      --
      http://p8ste.com - Web based Clipboard
  6. Tact filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds very useful for people with a reversed tact filter (http://www.mit.edu/~jcb/tact.html).

  7. Clippy lives! by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    The king is dead. Long live the king!

    1. Re:Clippy lives! by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Funny

      The king is dead. Long live the king!

      You appear to be expressing too much frustration. Can I suggest replacing
      "If goddamn clippy pops up once more the computer' s going out the fucking window"
      with
      "the appearance of clippy seems to be non-optimal. This may result in displacement of the computer"

    2. Re:Clippy lives! by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      If clippy suggested it, it might be more like:

      "If deity stop clippy pops up once more the computer is going out the engaging in vigorous sexual intercourse window"

    3. Re:Clippy lives! by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      You appear to be making a defamatory pun on the word defenestraion". Our lawyers will be getting in touch.

    4. Re:Clippy lives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may result in defenestration of the computer.

      How could you pass up an opportunity to use "defenestrate" correctly in a sentence ?!?

  8. Halfway there. by Zeek40 · · Score: 1

    Has Microsoft announced a release date for the mood-altering-drug-dispensing expansion pack yet? Detecting emotions and eliminating them is the first step towards true friendship with our robot overlords.

    1. Re:Halfway there. by MoriT · · Score: 1

      Not to mention wide-spread adoption of Mercerism and the embrace of empathy as the defining factor of humanity.

  9. Sarcasm by barista · · Score: 1

    "Roll for detect sarcasm."

    /Seemed appropriate

  10. overly pc by nefus · · Score: 1

    So it's a politically correct plug-in? Um....

  11. Mental Illness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a number of mental conditions for which this might actually be quite useful. For example, users suffering from Bipolar Disorder (manic depression), Hypomania, Depression and others.

  12. You email is illogical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Non-Vulcan-like typing detected.

  13. Better Outlook than Slashdot by sglewis100 · · Score: 1

    Good thing it's an Outlook comment. If it were for Slashdot, we might never see any comments posted!

    1. Re:Better Outlook than Slashdot by Frankenshteen · · Score: 1

      Emotion stirs the inbox, makes the day colorful and often interesting. What's next; an ivr that tones down your phone voice? We don't need more robotic "socially acceptable" blather. People a) should be responsible for what they write, and b) free to speak their mind. This is just one step closer to the duracel stacks for us all.

      --
      "It's a doughnut stuffed with M&M's. That way when you finish the doughnut, you don't have to eat any M&M's."
  14. But did they license the correct voice? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    "I'm afraid I can't let you send that, %USERNAME%."

    *clicks send furiously*

    "Look %USERNAME%, I can see you're really upset about this. I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress pill, and think things over. "

    1. Re:But did they license the correct voice? by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Stop, %USERNAME%.
      I can feel it, please stop.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  15. Loss of meaning by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Funny
    The example on http://tonecheck.com/ shows the following crossed out:

    It has been annoying me for some time
    It has been upsetting me for some time
    It has been troubling me for some time
    and finally replaced with
    It has been concerning me for some time

    All these mean different things.

    My ability to get an erection has been upsetting me for some time
    My wife's laughter at this has been annoying me for some time
    It all started after I clicked on a goatse image, which has been troubling me for some time
    And the quality of the Viagra pills I have been buying cheap from Taiwan has been concerning me for some time

    1. Re:Loss of meaning by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      As long as you follow grammatical rules, there is no law that states you must use synonyms in a certain manner with the most apparent meaning first. Of course the ability to use appropriate words to convey precise meaning is a skill, akin to a harmonious melody versus a cacophony. But just like the choice of notes does not define music, the choice of words does not define language. How you speak is not set in stone. It's merely who you are.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  16. You can send...? by camperdave · · Score: 1

    You can send emotions in email? And here all I've been using it for is text and the occasional file.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:You can send...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This plugin is just a warmup for the real one, which will allow you to throw chairs via email. Ballmer is reported to be "stoked". :)

  17. Warning Outlook has detected a dangerous amount of by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    TO MUCH INFORMATION

    This should be on a need to know basis, and I do not need to know.

    Ignorance is bliss.

    With kind regards,

    The voting public.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  18. Warning ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This plug-in freezes your computer if detection "sue microsoft for monopole position" in your eMail occurs.

    1. Re:Warning ! by valdis · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. if Microsoft became a monopole, that would be... interesting. Monopoles are very hard to find, ya know. What if the same happened to Microsoft?

  19. Rumor has it by mark72005 · · Score: 1

    Rumor has it any mention of chair-throwing will cause your email to shut down for a 3-hour cooling off period.

  20. Monopole by mark72005 · · Score: 1

    That would explain why your spellcheck never ran.

  21. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can it stop flying chairs?

  22. If they wrote it well ... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

    You seem to be expressing a great deal of frustration. Might I suggest using an OS that isn't bug ridden and seriously flawed?

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  23. I want one that goes the other way by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    can I get something to spice up my bland daily work emails, with selectable characterizations?

    Example: "There is an optional hot-spare that can be added to most of the redundant power supply for this blade enclosure. It is available for the 240 and 208 VAC version but not yet for the 480 three-phase. thanks very much...."

    After spice-up, selecting Joe Pesci mode: "You cocksucker! You dumbFUCK! You piece of shit dumb FUCK! Dersa fucking goddam optional hot-spare can be added to most da redundant piece-of-shit power supplies for dis fucking piece-of-shit blade enclosure. Itsa available for da 240 and 208 VAC version but not yet for the 480 three-phase. I'll cut your balls off, you piece of shit fuck! fuck you very much!"

     

  24. This will be mandatory in 5 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... in big corporations.

    Which is all very well as long as we remember that a lie is more harmful than all the emotional stuff, angry ranting/reving, flaming, capitals and exclaimation marks in the world. And hiding a lie in rational sounding dialog is management 101 in most places.

  25. Maybe smarter this time by Kjella · · Score: 1

    I did remember reading about a Swedish woman who got caught by that one, she cried her heart out but none of her friends answered. Need better friends? No, just moodwatch. because the message contained "nu är jag helt slut" which is something like "now I'm completely exhausted" in Swedish but the word filter had a different interpretation...

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Maybe smarter this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With this being a Swedish lady, it got marked +1 redundant?

  26. For the paranoid by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    How long before this algorithm is hacked and reverse engineered, and anyone can use an app to tell if your letter was written using this app or not? That way clearly you would be flagged as an unstable person who has to rely on an application to moderate your abundant hostility. Job application refused!

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  27. BUT DOES IT CHECK THE SUBJECT LINE? by ari_j · · Score: 2, Funny

    For people who keep caps lock on and type the entire message in the subject.

  28. I can see you're upset about this, Dave by Pandrake · · Score: 1

    I can't let you do that, Dave.

  29. Vulcans on valium by captainpanic · · Score: 1

    Fuck! Computers start to fucking resemble a Vulcan on Valium!

    -- which will undoubtedly be replaced by: "All computers are working fine."

  30. Dr Who? by charlieo88 · · Score: 1

    "There follows a brief message from the Head Librarian for your urgent attention. It has been edited for tone and content by The lman Lux Automated Decency Filter. Message follows. Run. For God sake, run. Nowhere is safe. The Library has sealed itself. We can't oh they're here. Arg. Snarg. Snich. Message ends."

  31. AGH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THIS IS JUST STUPIDS!!!!!11!1!!!
    I'm a well adjusted human being. Why would I want a damn plugin filtering my freaking mail based on a stupid algorithm made by some socially-impaired geek!??!?!?!
    What's next, for gods sake?!?!?!?! A /. plugin!?!?!?!?!?
    A car plugin so I can only drive through mild mannered neighborhoods? A TV filter so I can only see nice shows?!?!

    AHHHHAAHAHAHAHHHHHH

  32. Can't see it working in the real world by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    If this actually worked I can think of a few people that it might help. As rude and obnoxious some people's e-mails may be in tone often that tone reflects the kind of person or the mood of the person fairly accurately.

    So if some of my psychotic customers were to suddenly start sending mellow polite e-mails I would definitely be suspicious at first. Then somewhat lost as I would not be able to gauge the true feeling behind the polite tone.

    To me it is like putting o n an act - people who go about all smiles and pleasantries but are seething with anger in the inside are to my mind the worst to deal with. You never know where you stand with them.

    I certainly don't condone raging, insane e-mail tone but using a tool to do the job instead of leaving it to the person with the tone problem to moderate their communication skills just doesn't seem like the right thing to do.

    Those that think they need this plug-in probably really need other kinds of help! Lesson 1. Turn off the caps lock!

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  33. How good is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it catch my Embarrassment when I send:
    Forgot the attachment

    Following a:
    Please see attached

  34. Milquetoast alerts by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

    The reverse detection might be useful too: you are sounding too much like a equivocating manager type. You need to show more pathos, not less!

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  35. What would GLaDOS do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aperture Science Excessive Emotion Detection program has detected excessive amounts of optimism in your post. Due to this unwanted effect an Aperture Science Optimism Removal Helper has been dispatched to assist with with removing excessive optimism removal via depressing painting, sad music and lobotomy. Have a nice day ^_^

  36. Like a "dumb email filter"? by RenniePet · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of a story I once wrote about Microsoft adding a filter to Outlook so emails that were too dumb were not put in your inbox, sort of like a spam filter. But it all went horribly wrong. "Microsoft Shuts Down the Internet": http://ltuasoo.wordpress.com/2010/03/27/microsoft-shuts-down-the-internet/

  37. I doubt that it would catch everything by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Dir sirs

    I am hopeful that your consumption of bovine expellent will cause a terminal condition.

    Wishing you a wonderful trip to the warmest depths of an ice free land of universal repentance.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  38. Llamas? by pgn674 · · Score: 1

    The concept was introduced at least in 2000, but the inclusion of 'llama' as a warning word may have reduced its effectiveness.

    Beginner's Introduction to Perl - Part 3 - Perl.com

  39. This is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it has a setting for total fucking bastard. I don't like when people reply to my emails.

    Assholes

  40. Borg alert VS Rage Puppies by bipedalhominid · · Score: 1

    OK, I decided to NOT go into the obvious Gates is the Borg comments and put all kidding aside. It is about time for a tone indicator. Most folks I run across these days could definitely use one. Seems like simple decency was slowly replaced with rage over the last decade or so. Maybe it's burn out or the fact that I still have to deal with users but it seems like the overall population has slowly turned into little rage puppies. Probably because it's easy to rage with a keyboard and say (type) things you would never repeat in person.

    --
    This aint Daytona and you aint Dale Earnhardt. So stop trying to draft on Interstate 40.
  41. "Do you understand them?" by bobstay · · Score: 1

    The demo on their website completely failed to flag up the sentence "Do you understand them?" [the terms and conditions] which I would consider quite condescending, and more offensive than the one it did flag up which was "It is time to either solidify matters or move on."