what conspiracy? You are so not worth the effort.Provide the proof then I might be forced to rethink my position. When the Earth goes through a pole shift the EQUATOR is changed and so is the sea level....Think about it...centrifigul force sends the water to a different equator with raised sea levels there. Could be why there are ruins under water some 2000+ feet. But I'm a f'n crackpot because you haven't seen the evidence or don't accept it...Well go to...you know what, I don't give a shit what you think. I'm a pro level dh racer, artist , self employed sucess.... I don't need lame Slashdork calling me nuts when they can't provide anything to refute what I've said This is definatly my last post here.
It's only insane to bury your head in the sand....how is sand made? that's right, water slashing on rocks. How do you get vast areas of sand? vast areas of water. You have to be insane to believe the Pyramids are 5000 years old. You have to be insane to believe the D&M Pyramid is a trick of light. Call me insane, because it's all you have. People like you think you're smart but you have to be led to conclusions. I'm sorry you haven't the ability to put two and two together. Just call me names...it shows how bright you are.
Hey Dunbartheinept Do you even know what a pole shift is I doubt it or you would know I am not a lunatic. Besides, we aren't talking about the moon(luna in lunatic)Try insulting someone who will be bothered by it.
Current science says that it would be extremely unlikely that you would find liquid water, on the surface of Mars given it's current conditions (temperature, pressure). WRONG Look at this http://www.aadm.com/cydonia/waterpipe.html
the pictures wern't doctored but they used a contrast setting on that particular photo that was only used on that picture...no other pictures in the entire mission used that contrast setting! There's your trick of light go back and look at the face again, the 98 version, you can see that if you look at the "mouth" and try to see it as a jawline you might be able to see a smaller pharoahs face with a traditional beard jutting from the chin below the lighter lips that are definately visible when refrencing the jawline. The face is perhaps the oldest peice of artwork known to man...I find its message of strength and intellegence to be compelling. I wish it had been shared with us when I was 10 years old...I might have been a different person.
if we ever did start teaching this, how would people like George W. Bush ever stay in power?Or how could anything have risen to the level of impeachment. We have to be the stupidest advanced civilization ever. You are correct...If more people had critical thinking abilities, they wouldn't fall for such things as "it wasn't sex....it was just sex" or "trick of light".haha flaimbait...seriously though, some of us were unfortunate enough to develop critical thinking.. and it is our torture to see the mess our world is becoming. We see some things that defy logic, we point them out... if some call us theorists, so be it. The truth dosn't need aknowledgement to be true. Structures exist on Mars wether you choose to look at them or not. google search these two phrases to see credible NASA photos: "image PO35-06" "Mars anomolies" These guys found some proof that there was once life capable of constructing very large geometricly shaped monuments similar to GIZA EGYPT...They have taken the extrordinary step to publish there findings so others may learn from their work. Hoagland claims the pyramids at Mars aligned with the stars 450,000 years ago... wouldn't that have been enough time for man to have come to Earth, survive a few catstrophies and have only legends and very few tangible peices of evidence to proof it ever happened. The answer is certanly Yes...it is possible and every single civilization on earth has stories from the past that state this very scenario( all tweeked a little by each culture). My point is if more people had critical thinking they would see three or four destinct erosion lines on the pyramids that must have been cut by (here goes) an ocean at various levels and at several destinct periods of time. They would understand that it hasn't rained any significant ammount in the giza region for 10,000 years. They would soon learn about POLE SHIFTS and they would suddenly understand that the desert was once an ocean, and then not an ocean, and then an ocean again, and so on...The pattern of the universe would become appearent to them and they would see that ancient culture were aware of this. They would understand that monestaries are built on mountains to escape the flood that ensues during a pole shift and that ancient people were pretty smart. Critcal thinking is such fun... don't you think?
If you look really close you may see that what appears to be the mouth is really the bottom of the jaw of the face. In the center you will see an area that appears to be lighter and shaped like lips. Under this is a chin and a pharoahs beard. The two faces (man and lion) are seperated at an angle of 19.5 degrees with respect to the bottom center of the structure and the centerline of each face. It is not seperated down the middle. If you use the angle I describe to find the centers of the faces and then mirror the halves you will see very clear facial features including classic sphinx features...full proud lips and jutting jawline. Trick of light...how scientific. How can we counter such irrefutable evidence...it's just a trick of light. Several different photos show the same features yet we are to believe it's the angle of the light? Trick of light... it's so convenient...
every time I hear that I'm nuts because i believe the pictures of structures on Mars are real, I lose a little more respect for the scientific community. WTF do we go to Mars for... so assholes like you can say a 2 mile long depiction of a human and lion face that is 1/4 mile high is a fucking trick of light? What about the other structures at 90 degrees to the face. How about the mathmatical message that is repeated all over the complex... You have a negative bias towards information that doen't fit your paradigm. The connections with enigmatic structures on earth such as mayan, aztec and egyptian pyramids is far too great to ignore. Recent discoveries of massive structures under water at over 2000 feet also provide further evidence of previous achievements of mankind. Explain why the Brookings inst. determined that any evidence of ancient civilizations found in space could lead to chaos. WTF are we doing if you people are just going to hide the results. Why does the brookings inst. think scientists would be most hard hit by such a revelation...aren't they supposed to be the most excited about it? I'm sure you have not taken the time to really research some of the claims of people like Hoagland or Beardon because you would have found the evidence overwhelming. You just rely on what some guy at NASA says and that is good enough for you. You don't really have the capacity to learn things without someone explaining them to you. Try researching hyperdimensional physics and you will begin to see ancient art in a whole new context. The Sumerians didn't name all the planets without knowing they existed. Pull your head out of NASA's ass
I guess dried up river beds was refutable. Finding out that there was once water on Mars...hardly something worth all the effort cosidering THE DRIED UP RIVER BEDS. Hey did they finr anymore TRICKS OF LIGHT. check out this picture at MSSS:http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/e01_e06/full_ jpg_ctx_map/E05/E0502144.jpg WTF is that...wind erosion?
It's funny on slahdot you can be branded troll for pointing out something. I once saw a picture on the MSSS site that looked like an entire area was replaced with "dunes". First, the dunes all looked alike including the size, shape and even the same little erosion lines running from the peak... all of them, some thirty or so were right next to one another so it was hard not to notice how similar they were...they were pasted copies of the same "dune". What was being hidden? we will never know but I have seen what NASA will do to hide anything that might not fit their paradigm. If NASA finds life, wouldn't that be the end of the search for life? Hmmm... I wonder why they discredit any signs of life. If I got paid to look for something... you better believe I'd never find it.
regular cars were always unsafe. Drive an SUV because it is SAFER (especially in poor weather) A 5000 s/ft house is less economical than a MUD HUT.everyone should live in a mud hut!(sarcastic overtone) There is always something wrong isn't there? Why don't you just walk
but most people don't need them. Most people don't need a 5000 s/ft home either. Do you hate big house too? Where does it end with people like you? Why is the SUV the problem when it's the smaller car that is unsafe. Your solution: everyone should drive the unsafe cars because we don't want anyone to be more safe than anyone else. trucks have been on the roads for decades...they have high bumpers too...Do you hate them?
I THINK IT IS JUST YOU. If it was the 1800's you would be slamming big horses saying everyone should ride a donkey. If you don't like SUV's, don't buy one. If you don't being on the road with SUV's, don't drive. Just quit bashing a type of vehicle because some bad driver was in one once and they scared you. They could have been driving anything. SUV's don't drive themselves
Doesn't it just come down to `people suck,' though? If everyone drove a motorcycle, then the average motorcyclist would be completely clueless. I don't think it could have been said any better! There will always be drivers that suck because people have different reaction times and levels of coordination. I wish drivers were required to drive at a race course and push the limits of their skill. The road would be safer if everyone knew the limits of their vehicles. The fact that most people don't drive their cars at maximum levels leads them to underestimate the cars ability. This then causes them to over react in situations where a more skilled driver who knows the limits of the vehicle is able to handle with ease. As a pro level DH mountain bike racer(SEE PLATTEKILL)I have found that to learn what a bike can do... you have to find out what it can't do. This means a few close calls or big crashes but in the end it is the only way to know what you can do on a vehicle. My point: people drive bad because they are not forced to drive good.
WOW! It must be cool to be in California. It rains here and snows in the winter. Oh yeah... It's hard to fit all my floor sanding tools on a motorcycle so I can go to work.
"High technology professionals" are employees who: Develop information technology systems; Develop scientific or technological products, materials, devices or processes; or, Conduct scientific research and experimental development.
I think he might mean that todays equipment allows people to learn quicker, and as a result, the value of your labor decreases. Your knowledge may be great, but it can all be duplicated in a quarter of the time it took you to gain it in todays computer envrionment. Just a fact of technology. Plus... As we gain experience we become a threat to those who provide our employment. Employees have a Shelf Life Take your skills and put them to work where they can fully grow without fear of getting too good
Actually, I'm too poor to have cable anymore. I choose to have internet service instead. Plus I hate the biased media. I think the bundling is fine... my point was that a la carte would make no difference in the cost to the cable co. To supply all the channels or only some does not increase or decrease the cost to the cable co. If you buy less channels, there is a reduced number of possible advertisments you could possibly be tuned into(compared to all channels) therefore the cable company has less ads that can reach you.... THEY DON'T LIKE THAT So you must pay more for less.... does that sound right I wish TV was free... even if you had a scrolling advertisement on half the screen. But I can't see paying to get biased news, infomercials, and advertisements.
Slashdot Mirror
what conspiracy? You are so not worth the effort.Provide the proof then I might be forced to rethink my position. When the Earth goes through a pole shift the EQUATOR is changed and so is the sea level....Think about it...centrifigul force sends the water to a different equator with raised sea levels there. Could be why there are ruins under water some 2000+ feet. But I'm a f'n crackpot because you haven't seen the evidence or don't accept it...Well go to ...you know what, I don't give a shit what you think. I'm a pro level dh racer, artist , self employed sucess.... I don't need lame Slashdork calling me nuts when they can't provide anything to refute what I've said
This is definatly my last post here.
too bad you can't provide something to show me I'm wrong
It's only insane to bury your head in the sand....how is sand made? that's right, water slashing on rocks. How do you get vast areas of sand? vast areas of water. You have to be insane to believe the Pyramids are 5000 years old. You have to be insane to believe the D&M Pyramid is a trick of light. Call me insane, because it's all you have. People like you think you're smart but you have to be led to conclusions. I'm sorry you haven't the ability to put two and two together. Just call me names...it shows how bright you are.
Hey Dunbartheinept Do you even know what a pole shift is I doubt it or you would know I am not a lunatic. Besides, we aren't talking about the moon(luna in lunatic)Try insulting someone who will be bothered by it.
I'm a kunatic because evidence exists that nnasa covers up...FUCK OU
Current science says that it would be extremely unlikely that you would find liquid water, on the surface of Mars given it's current conditions (temperature, pressure).
WRONG
Look at this http://www.aadm.com/cydonia/waterpipe.html
You have answered many questions for me
thank you
the pictures wern't doctored but they used a contrast setting on that particular photo that was only used on that picture...no other pictures in the entire mission used that contrast setting!
There's your trick of light
go back and look at the face again, the 98 version, you can see that if you look at the "mouth" and try to see it as a jawline you might be able to see a smaller pharoahs face with a traditional beard jutting from the chin below the lighter lips that are definately visible when refrencing the jawline. The face is perhaps the oldest peice of artwork known to man...I find its message of strength and intellegence to be compelling. I wish it had been shared with us when I was 10 years old...I might have been a different person.
if we ever did start teaching this, how would people like George W. Bush ever stay in power?Or how could anything have risen to the level of impeachment. We have to be the stupidest advanced civilization ever. You are correct...If more people had critical thinking abilities, they wouldn't fall for such things as "it wasn't sex....it was just sex" or "trick of light".haha flaimbait ...seriously though, some of us were unfortunate enough to develop critical thinking.. and it is our torture to see the mess our world is becoming. We see some things that defy logic, we point them out... if some call us theorists, so be it. The truth dosn't need aknowledgement to be true. Structures exist on Mars wether you choose to look at them or not.
google search these two phrases to see credible NASA photos: "image PO35-06"
"Mars anomolies"
These guys found some proof that there was once life capable of constructing very large geometricly shaped monuments similar to GIZA EGYPT...They have taken the extrordinary step to publish there findings so others may learn from their work. Hoagland claims the pyramids at Mars aligned with the stars 450,000 years ago... wouldn't that have been enough time for man to have come to Earth, survive a few catstrophies and have only legends and very few tangible peices of evidence to proof it ever happened. The answer is certanly Yes...it is possible and every single civilization on earth has stories from the past that state this very scenario( all tweeked a little by each culture).
My point is if more people had critical thinking they would see three or four destinct erosion lines on the pyramids that must have been cut by (here goes) an ocean at various levels and at several destinct periods of time. They would understand that it hasn't rained any significant ammount in the giza region for 10,000 years. They would soon learn about POLE SHIFTS and they would suddenly understand that the desert was once an ocean, and then not an ocean, and then an ocean again, and so on...The pattern of the universe would become appearent to them and they would see that ancient culture were aware of this. They would understand that monestaries are built on mountains to escape the flood that ensues during a pole shift and that ancient people were pretty smart.
Critcal thinking is such fun... don't you think?
I know... I saw a face in a pile of dirty clothes. then later, i saw underwear in this guys face.
They can't land there....The search for life would be over. They would be out of a job. These guys aren't stupid...but they think we are.
If you look really close you may see that what appears to be the mouth is really the bottom of the jaw of the face. In the center you will see an area that appears to be lighter and shaped like lips. Under this is a chin and a pharoahs beard. The two faces (man and lion) are seperated at an angle of 19.5 degrees with respect to the bottom center of the structure and the centerline of each face. It is not seperated down the middle. If you use the angle I describe to find the centers of the faces and then mirror the halves you will see very clear facial features including classic sphinx features...full proud lips and jutting jawline. Trick of light ...how scientific. How can we counter such irrefutable evidence...it's just a trick of light. Several different photos show the same features yet we are to believe it's the angle of the light? Trick of light... it's so convenient...
Your right
There has never been a conspiricy... ever
every time I hear that I'm nuts because i believe the pictures of structures on Mars are real, I lose a little more respect for the scientific community. WTF do we go to Mars for... so assholes like you can say a 2 mile long depiction of a human and lion face that is 1/4 mile high is a fucking trick of light? What about the other structures at 90 degrees to the face. How about the mathmatical message that is repeated all over the complex... You have a negative bias towards information that doen't fit your paradigm. The connections with enigmatic structures on earth such as mayan, aztec and egyptian pyramids is far too great to ignore. Recent discoveries of massive structures under water at over 2000 feet also provide further evidence of previous achievements of mankind. Explain why the Brookings inst. determined that any evidence of ancient civilizations found in space could lead to chaos. WTF are we doing if you people are just going to hide the results. Why does the brookings inst. think scientists would be most hard hit by such a revelation...aren't they supposed to be the most excited about it? I'm sure you have not taken the time to really research some of the claims of people like Hoagland or Beardon because you would have found the evidence overwhelming. You just rely on what some guy at NASA says and that is good enough for you. You don't really have the capacity to learn things without someone explaining them to you. Try researching hyperdimensional physics and you will begin to see ancient art in a whole new context. The Sumerians didn't name all the planets without knowing they existed. Pull your head out of NASA's ass
I guess dried up river beds was refutable._ jpg_ctx_map/E05/E0502144.jpg
Finding out that there was once water on Mars...hardly something worth all the effort cosidering THE DRIED UP RIVER BEDS.
Hey did they finr anymore TRICKS OF LIGHT.
check out this picture at MSSS:http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/e01_e06/full
WTF is that...wind erosion?
It's funny
on slahdot you can be branded troll for pointing out something. I once saw a picture on the MSSS site that looked like an entire area was replaced with "dunes". First, the dunes all looked alike including the size, shape and even the same little erosion lines running from the peak... all of them, some thirty or so were right next to one another so it was hard not to notice how similar they were...they were pasted copies of the same "dune". What was being hidden? we will never know but I have seen what NASA will do to hide anything that might not fit their paradigm.
If NASA finds life, wouldn't that be the end of the search for life? Hmmm... I wonder why they discredit any signs of life.
If I got paid to look for something... you better believe I'd never find it.
regular cars were always unsafe.
Drive an SUV because it is SAFER (especially in poor weather)
A 5000 s/ft house is less economical than a MUD HUT.everyone should live in a mud hut!(sarcastic overtone)
There is always something wrong isn't there?
Why don't you just walk
but most people don't need them.
Most people don't need a 5000 s/ft home either.
Do you hate big house too?
Where does it end with people like you?
Why is the SUV the problem when it's the smaller car that is unsafe.
Your solution: everyone should drive the unsafe cars because we don't want anyone to be more safe than anyone else.
trucks have been on the roads for decades...they have high bumpers too...Do you hate them?
No troll...funny
I THINK IT IS JUST YOU.
If it was the 1800's you would be slamming big horses saying everyone should ride a donkey.
If you don't like SUV's, don't buy one.
If you don't being on the road with SUV's, don't drive.
Just quit bashing a type of vehicle because some bad driver was in one once and they scared you.
They could have been driving anything.
SUV's don't drive themselves
Doesn't it just come down to `people suck,' though? If everyone drove a motorcycle, then the average motorcyclist would be completely clueless.
I don't think it could have been said any better!
There will always be drivers that suck because people have different reaction times and levels of coordination.
I wish drivers were required to drive at a race course and push the limits of their skill.
The road would be safer if everyone knew the limits of their vehicles. The fact that most people don't drive their cars at maximum levels leads them to underestimate the cars ability. This then causes them to over react in situations where a more skilled driver who knows the limits of the vehicle is able to handle with ease.
As a pro level DH mountain bike racer(SEE PLATTEKILL)I have found that to learn what a bike can do... you have to find out what it can't do. This means a few close calls or big crashes but in the end it is the only way to know what you can do on a vehicle.
My point: people drive bad because they are not forced to drive good.
WOW!
It must be cool to be in California.
It rains here and snows in the winter.
Oh yeah... It's hard to fit all my floor sanding tools on a motorcycle so I can go to work.
Please stop bashing SUV's...Some of us NEED them.
"High technology professionals" are employees who: Develop information technology systems; Develop scientific or technological products, materials, devices or processes; or, Conduct scientific research and experimental development.
This is everything but flipping burgers
Yes... I'll have cheese on that
I think he might mean that todays equipment allows people to learn quicker, and as a result, the value of your labor decreases.
Your knowledge may be great, but it can all be duplicated in a quarter of the time it took you to gain it in todays computer envrionment.
Just a fact of technology.
Plus... As we gain experience we become a threat to those who provide our employment.
Employees have a Shelf Life
Take your skills and put them to work where they can fully grow without fear of getting too good
Become Self Employed
How about a Gangsta Rap Theme
We could explain physics with a renactment of a drive by shooting...bullet path...get away car acceleration...
Let's really get these kids into it!
No Troll....Funny
Actually, I'm too poor to have cable anymore. I choose to have internet service instead. Plus I hate the biased media. I think the bundling is fine... my point was that a la carte would make no difference in the cost to the cable co. To supply all the channels or only some does not increase or decrease the cost to the cable co. If you buy less channels, there is a reduced number of possible advertisments you could possibly be tuned into(compared to all channels) therefore the cable company has less ads that can reach you....
THEY DON'T LIKE THAT
So you must pay more for less....
does that sound right
I wish TV was free... even if you had a scrolling advertisement on half the screen. But I can't see paying to get biased news, infomercials, and advertisements.