Sound might be a very important way to convey images, either an additional one to textures, or replacing the textures completely. It may instantly inform about the kind of a surface. Sound might also convey edges, but then there is a problem of detecting edges: it is usually easy if the map is in a vector form, but in the case of general raster images a good edge detector or even a human that would mark the edges might be needed.
Partly offtopic: a free software to convert images to tactile graphics using edge detection and textures: JTactileGraphics. It does not have sound support currently, but one is being added.
my comment here, I had put it in another branch by mistake.
BTW, I do not criticize that software, even that I would rather use some standard with available open source implementations, I just meant that the story uses misleading terms.
This is exactly tha page with that citation. Your comment seems to be disinformative in a way similar to that of the story text. Perhaps you'd need to read the Open Source Definition.
It is amazing that the whole multi-stage - three parachutes amongst other - landing was a success and the images are very interesting, but why the images seem to be ever more blurry than these of the Venera 14 from 1982?
I meant that sharing bandwidth by a community
might be good not only for streams, but also for some types of internet sites. The methods might have to be much more complex than in the case of a single stream, for example only xml/images would be exchanged by the peer computers, and then the xml/images would be converted to html by downloading much less data fromn one of the more centralized servers.
A community could also run sites like Slashdot
with everybody sharing the bandwidth. That might mean no ads, no dependency on a single corporation, everybody can participate in selecting stories, setting "locality" - browsing stories scored by an interest group a reader belongs to, by a group close geographically, or with the score averaged globally.
I mean the kind of patents that, even if they might possibly be very complex and it could take long to invent them, are more like mathematical theories, and very generic. A scientist might read about a theory and develop other theories on basis of this. But, if the scientist is paid by money from patents, then the scientist might want to prevent others from, effectively, using/enhancing/testing a mathematical theory.
Anyone knows if/how the surrond using typical 4/6 speaker sets could be done better using some of the advanced sound wave interference algorithms? Even in a small `fine spot'?
Is not this the same institute that had the submarine MP3 patents? I might be wrong and their work is probably very interesting, but obvious "patents" might perhaps turn it into another GIF/MP3/...-like story.
Some of the spherules are `budding' like it can be seen
here, so perhaps the spherules grown in
some kind of a seed and deposits process. But
perhaps they could just melt or something
into one piece.
Perhaps some hints about their origin could come
from meausuring a set of the spherules and this
way finding their size distribution.
Several of the photographed spherules seem to have various features close to their tops, i.e.
they seem to be pointed like here. There is
also a photo of a cut of one of the spherules. If you brighten dark colors
in the image
something like a central stem, dendritic structures in, relatively to the
image, upper part of the spherule, and a `glue' to the left of the spherule,
can be seen.
Slashdot Mirror
Sound might be a very important way to convey images, either an additional one to textures, or replacing the textures completely. It may instantly inform about the kind of a surface. Sound might also convey edges, but then there is a problem of detecting edges: it is usually easy if the map is in a vector form, but in the case of general raster images a good edge detector or even a human that would mark the edges might be needed.
Partly offtopic: a free software to convert images to tactile graphics using edge detection and textures: JTactileGraphics. It does not have sound support currently, but one is being added.
my comment here, I had put it in another branch by mistake. BTW, I do not criticize that software, even that I would rather use some standard with available open source implementations, I just meant that the story uses misleading terms.
This is exactly tha page with that citation. Your comment seems to be disinformative in a way similar to that of the story text. Perhaps you'd need to read the Open Source Definition.
From their pages: "Ciphire Mail will always be free for private users, non-profit organizations, educational institutions, and the press".
Thanks. I also have just found a great page about the probe instrument: DISR.
Ah, it might be that there was very dark - it is about one light out long to Sun and there is a thick haze. I forgot about that.
It is amazing that the whole multi-stage - three parachutes amongst other - landing was a success and the images are very interesting, but why the images seem to be ever more blurry than these of the Venera 14 from 1982?
I meant that sharing bandwidth by a community might be good not only for streams, but also for some types of internet sites. The methods might have to be much more complex than in the case of a single stream, for example only xml/images would be exchanged by the peer computers, and then the xml/images would be converted to html by downloading much less data fromn one of the more centralized servers.
A community could also run sites like Slashdot with everybody sharing the bandwidth. That might mean no ads, no dependency on a single corporation, everybody can participate in selecting stories, setting "locality" - browsing stories scored by an interest group a reader belongs to, by a group close geographically, or with the score averaged globally.
Do monitors/printers/etc. produce low quality color
:)
images in the eyes of women?
Perhaps R1R2GB/CMY1Y2 devices would better fit to
their needs?
There are, but Earth and Moon, three small dots visible in the larger image. Anyone knows what they are?
I mean the kind of patents that, even if they might possibly be very complex and it could take long to invent them, are more like mathematical theories, and very generic. A scientist might read about a theory and develop other theories on basis of this. But, if the scientist is paid by money from patents, then the scientist might want to prevent others from, effectively, using/enhancing/testing a mathematical theory.
Anyone knows if/how the surrond using typical 4/6 speaker sets could be done better using some of the advanced sound wave interference algorithms? Even in a small `fine spot'?
Byt the way, anyone knows how is it related to this: Single Speaker Unit Delivers Surround Sound?
Some of the spherules are `budding' like it can be seen here, so perhaps the spherules grown in some kind of a seed and deposits process. But perhaps they could just melt or something into one piece. Perhaps some hints about their origin could come from meausuring a set of the spherules and this way finding their size distribution.
These can be illusions, of course.