I agree.
I do have trouble with the article's scope, however, being limited to medical studies. Iff the medical studies are being conducted properly, that is, for one thing, without bias from potential monetary interests, there is nothing wrong with getting it wrong.
Standing on shoulders.
The OP and some others that responded to it need to understand this response; it is dead-on.
I agree. I do have trouble with the article's scope, however, being limited to medical studies. Iff the medical studies are being conducted properly, that is, for one thing, without bias from potential monetary interests, there is nothing wrong with getting it wrong. Standing on shoulders.