"I remain unconvinced that an extra-US "solution" will be any less broken than a US one. "
Not the point, it is a conceptional one, not a technical one. The US having have been using Echelon for industrial espionage, passing back sensitive comercial information to US corporations. It is not a conspiricy theory, they even admit it. So why on earth would anyone in Europe have any desire to use a US encryption scheme that is sure to be insecure even if it is nor crackable?
It's a conception problem. After the numerous cases of US intelligence being used to aid US companies, and the extremely unilateral stance of the US on technology issues, nobody in the EU has any faith in the US any more.
Put another way, any solution is better than a US one because the latter is certain not to be secure!
That banking systems have been computerized, and quite a few years that they make extensive use of communications.
There are ways to protect sensitive data, such as using VPN's rather than the internet for e.g. Doctors accessing hospital records, grid computing etc. Doing everything on the open internet is neither necessary nor desirable.
But Canadair turnrounds can be as low as 15 mins between bombings, and that is also usefull for ground crews to provide feedback. I think little and often is a better strategy than big drop/big interval.
BTW, the 747 not only needs a significant airstip, you have to get all that water on board and it has to come from somewhere!
True, my knowledge of Canadairs comes from thier use in Italy, where you are never far from a lake or the sea, I can imagine some areas of the US may be different.
After all, Java development environments are well known for thier conciseness and simple nature. Let's throw another couple of tools into the works....
Slashdot Mirror
I think it is a great concept!
I thought MACS allready came with a BSD derived OS?
These are good points. Just don't go to the seminar. People who believe MS has a lowwer TCO will go, and they will believe it whoever is there.
Not the point, it is a conceptional one, not a technical one. The US having have been using Echelon for industrial espionage, passing back sensitive comercial information to US corporations. It is not a conspiricy theory, they even admit it. So why on earth would anyone in Europe have any desire to use a US encryption scheme that is sure to be insecure even if it is nor crackable?
BTW, I have a subtle feeling that the TCO savings you get with XP server are because it is designed to be a pig to manage without it.
What do mean you allready knew that......before the product was even beta'd????????
....tux reveals that he is the tooth fairy and Santa Claus is his father.
How long has it been a serious news source?
Put another way, any solution is better than a US one because the latter is certain not to be secure!
And who said modern art isn't worth a dime!
Yep. Of course I was reffering to analog EEPROM cells, such as those that were used in the ISD audio recording chips ;-)
Yes. But the "V" means you get most of the flexibility and cost advantages of the internet whilst being able to control the access points.
There are ways to protect sensitive data, such as using VPN's rather than the internet for e.g. Doctors accessing hospital records, grid computing etc. Doing everything on the open internet is neither necessary nor desirable.
I think our software deployment capability exceeds our network architecture design capability.
Mind you, he didn't go anywhere interesting did he!
I was reffereing to the fact that Paul Allen and Bill Gates started Microsoft porting Basic interpreters from a "borrowed" open source base.
.....and seeing as how they have such close ties to MS, perhaps they could run a study as to how Microsoft came to be born.
Look at embedded systems and you will see fresh new well thougth out solutions which have much lowwer memory requirements.
180M transistors means we could have e.g. 100Mb flash, 40Mb RAM and an ARM on the same chip.
That could do an awful lot in some apps!
Looks like here we are pointing at server technology.
How long before we have a 64/32/16 bit vatiable word size Thumb like architecture?
But Canadair turnrounds can be as low as 15 mins between bombings, and that is also usefull for ground crews to provide feedback. I think little and often is a better strategy than big drop/big interval.
BTW, the 747 not only needs a significant airstip, you have to get all that water on board and it has to come from somewhere!
True, my knowledge of Canadairs comes from thier use in Italy, where you are never far from a lake or the sea, I can imagine some areas of the US may be different.
Somehow I can't envisage this with a 747, and how many 747 sized airstrips do you find near forestry areas?
After all, Java development environments are well known for thier conciseness and simple nature. Let's throw another couple of tools into the works....
x86 life looks ever more limited!
Then the BSD deamon could be thrown in at random moments to spice things up a bit!
How about being able to lamp other players on the nose for eyeing up your dancing partner?
Managing daemon apps is apparently very easy, but sending stuf to /dev/null can be quite spectacular ;-)
Or so they tell me, I am stuck with Windows, the orginal devils OS.
With SCOX stock (SCO groups ticker symbol) it has become a kind of sport