Ya, I actually told this to one of the Engineers from Hyundai who met me and hooked up diagnostics and had me drive my car around the block about 5 times. I think the problem is that the sensor only polls the fuel consumption so often and so it misses major spikes in consumption. That's just my theory.
I think you don't understand the rules of engagement. The Military is not a police force and the people they fight with are not civilians in the strict sense. Yes, drone strikes may be sent against non-governmental fighting forces but they are still armies and they are still at war with us and to insinuate that they are not is just wrong.
Everything you said is true, but that doesn't make it right. Every officer or detective in the force may WANT to be involved in the high profile cases. Its the job of management to put them back at their desks doing the work that NEEDS to be done.
And then I would be charged in the highest tier for my Electricity ( I live in California where electricity is expensive) and then that would be compounded by the fact that incandescent produces massive amounts of heat which would raise my electricity bill even further to cool down. Again, I live in California where I need to use A/C 9 months out of the year. I'm glad I don't use incandescent.
Now, lets expand and point out something this article got wrong. They say you would only have to replace a CFL three times over the course of an LED lifespan. In my experience, this is at least an order of a magnitude on the low side. I have dimmers in all my sockets and the dimmable CFL lights will fail sometimes within a year to a year and a half. In that case, I'd be replacing 15-20 CFL lights per LED light I put in. Nevermind that CFL has a serious issue with diminishing light quality over the lifespan. Yes, there are CFLs without these problems, and they are 50-100% more expensive then the normal ones.
I don't know what a "climate denier" even is. However, what I hope this new processing power brings is an end to the excuses as to why the current models are so bad and a new age where models are truly scrutinized to see if they are in fact accurate or not.
Yes, the embassy apologized for the video when they should not have. Then the Administration picked up on this and parroted the same BS lines about certain free speech shouldn't be used. Then they failed to fully condemn the attacks because they were too busy apologizing. This is the problem. Obama himself is horrible on foreign affairs. Only days/weeks later did his cabinet nail him to the wall for it and force him to change course and start saying "the right things". Moreover, they didn't even make the distinction that the Video came from a private citizens and we have rights in our Country when they don't. Obama = incompetent nincompoop.
How should one mind his/her own business when you just posted in a public forum on a public website for all the world to see? Just wondering. What has been seen cannot be unseen.
I'm going to say this as slowly and concisely as possibly. Washington Mutual was solvent when the FTB and OTS sold them to Chase. Rinse, Lather , Repeat for almost every bank taken over.
Funneling money to business and funneling money to SPECIFIC businesses is completely different. In the words of Mittens: "You don't just pick the winners and losers, you just pick the losers".
Ya, well I did unfriend someone once but not because they had a different opinion then mine. I unfriended them because they called everyone who didn't share their opinion, a bigot.
I do event photography and its a side business and not my main job. I shoot about 4-5 events a year and either break even or make a slight profit. Therefore the $189 could put over on costs for the year. However, I agree that in the grand scheme of things paying the $189 is not that big of deal.
This is a common trick to guarantee income stream. If the company you are running has no income, tell them you are being nice and take zero salary. At the same time outsource their biggest cost to... yourself. Constant revenue stream.
Are you done sensationalizing? I work for an MSP who has financial advisors as clients. These places are never going to be able to hire a full time person to perform their IT duties. Even if they could afford that they would have to pay even more for all the monitoring, backup, etc. Instead with us they get all of that at a fraction of the cost since we can solve almost any situation remotely but will also drive to fix things that require on-site. In the time we have had these clients, security has improved as we brought them in compliance with things like the GLBA etc. with whole hard drive encryption and encrypted email communication. Our company has had a security leak exactly zero times. I guess the point is this. Its not important that you outsource or don't outsource; its important WHO you have doing the work. Inside or out, these people CAN cause a lot of headaches but hire the right group and you'll be fine.
None of them give you the full functionality of Outlook except Exchange. Now you can argue that you should use Lotus Notes instead but that's a whole different discussion for a different day. The point is there are only a few Enterprise level email solutions out there and Exchange is still one of the best. If you don't want to host it yourself then look to Office 365 or Intermedia.
Slashdot Mirror
Ya, I actually told this to one of the Engineers from Hyundai who met me and hooked up diagnostics and had me drive my car around the block about 5 times. I think the problem is that the sensor only polls the fuel consumption so often and so it misses major spikes in consumption. That's just my theory.
Ya, basically there is a reason that a lot of companies are rolling out NAS solutions that run Windows Storage Server instead of Linux.
SBS is going away but using the ADUC snap-in is not any harder then SBS so your comments still hold mostly true.
Napolitano needs to go. Vote accordingly tomorrow.
I think you don't understand the rules of engagement. The Military is not a police force and the people they fight with are not civilians in the strict sense. Yes, drone strikes may be sent against non-governmental fighting forces but they are still armies and they are still at war with us and to insinuate that they are not is just wrong.
Everything you said is true, but that doesn't make it right. Every officer or detective in the force may WANT to be involved in the high profile cases. Its the job of management to put them back at their desks doing the work that NEEDS to be done.
And then I would be charged in the highest tier for my Electricity ( I live in California where electricity is expensive) and then that would be compounded by the fact that incandescent produces massive amounts of heat which would raise my electricity bill even further to cool down. Again, I live in California where I need to use A/C 9 months out of the year. I'm glad I don't use incandescent.
I'm fairly certain the light output is basically the same per watt for LEDs compared to CFL. In fact here, I looked it up http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/01/led-vs-cfl-which-light-bulb-is-more-efficient/ and the LED's actually produce MORE lumens per watt.
Now, lets expand and point out something this article got wrong. They say you would only have to replace a CFL three times over the course of an LED lifespan. In my experience, this is at least an order of a magnitude on the low side. I have dimmers in all my sockets and the dimmable CFL lights will fail sometimes within a year to a year and a half. In that case, I'd be replacing 15-20 CFL lights per LED light I put in. Nevermind that CFL has a serious issue with diminishing light quality over the lifespan. Yes, there are CFLs without these problems, and they are 50-100% more expensive then the normal ones.
"Storage Spaces". Google it.
I don't know what a "climate denier" even is. However, what I hope this new processing power brings is an end to the excuses as to why the current models are so bad and a new age where models are truly scrutinized to see if they are in fact accurate or not.
So you're dressing up as Yasser Arafat?
Punch in "crybaby mohammed" into your google image search. /thread.
We really didn't need to go there. There is a difference between one religion which is intolerant of all others and all religions in general.
Yes, the embassy apologized for the video when they should not have. Then the Administration picked up on this and parroted the same BS lines about certain free speech shouldn't be used. Then they failed to fully condemn the attacks because they were too busy apologizing. This is the problem. Obama himself is horrible on foreign affairs. Only days/weeks later did his cabinet nail him to the wall for it and force him to change course and start saying "the right things". Moreover, they didn't even make the distinction that the Video came from a private citizens and we have rights in our Country when they don't. Obama = incompetent nincompoop.
How should one mind his/her own business when you just posted in a public forum on a public website for all the world to see? Just wondering. What has been seen cannot be unseen.
I'm going to say this as slowly and concisely as possibly. Washington Mutual was solvent when the FTB and OTS sold them to Chase. Rinse, Lather , Repeat for almost every bank taken over.
Funneling money to business and funneling money to SPECIFIC businesses is completely different. In the words of Mittens: "You don't just pick the winners and losers, you just pick the losers".
Ya, well I did unfriend someone once but not because they had a different opinion then mine. I unfriended them because they called everyone who didn't share their opinion, a bigot.
Ya, these people only want to live in echo chambers filled with "Yes Men" who never contradict anything they say.
I do event photography and its a side business and not my main job. I shoot about 4-5 events a year and either break even or make a slight profit. Therefore the $189 could put over on costs for the year. However, I agree that in the grand scheme of things paying the $189 is not that big of deal.
Maybe you should look at this then. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18128
Just because Microsoft hosts your email doesn't mean you can't control the DNS.
This is a common trick to guarantee income stream. If the company you are running has no income, tell them you are being nice and take zero salary. At the same time outsource their biggest cost to... yourself. Constant revenue stream.
Are you done sensationalizing? I work for an MSP who has financial advisors as clients. These places are never going to be able to hire a full time person to perform their IT duties. Even if they could afford that they would have to pay even more for all the monitoring, backup, etc. Instead with us they get all of that at a fraction of the cost since we can solve almost any situation remotely but will also drive to fix things that require on-site. In the time we have had these clients, security has improved as we brought them in compliance with things like the GLBA etc. with whole hard drive encryption and encrypted email communication. Our company has had a security leak exactly zero times. I guess the point is this. Its not important that you outsource or don't outsource; its important WHO you have doing the work. Inside or out, these people CAN cause a lot of headaches but hire the right group and you'll be fine.
None of them give you the full functionality of Outlook except Exchange. Now you can argue that you should use Lotus Notes instead but that's a whole different discussion for a different day. The point is there are only a few Enterprise level email solutions out there and Exchange is still one of the best. If you don't want to host it yourself then look to Office 365 or Intermedia.