Yes, there is ample proof on steroids. If you care to disprove the emails that Wikileaks is dumping, Congressional Testimony from her, Comey, Gowdy, Lynch, et.al? I'd put them on par but Hillary has been a Politician and associated with Politics since she was a teenager. Wow, a book on Donald Trump which probably takes a bunch from his auto biography. Care to perform a basic book title search on the nasty crap about the Clinton's? Pick any book by Ann Coulter who is a journalist and lists hundreds to thousands of sources in every book. These are not the hype books like the Clinton Cash which may be fluffed narratives, there are literally hundreds of books written about or mentioning Clinton Corruption. "No One Left to Lie To", "Guilty as Sin", "Crisis of Character", "Partners in Crime", and again every single Ann Coulter books including "High Crimes and Misdemeanors". Those are off the top of my head.
Compared to a Businessman who has not used Political office to get rich I think the corrupt pick is obvious. Have doubts, get reading!
Good grief, Check BASIC FACTS! I'll post two sources so that you can't complain about bias in the first. Seriously, do you know how to type two words into a fucking search engine? http://www.breitbart.com/big-g... http://www.wsj.com/articles/an-internet-giveaway-to-the-u-n-1472421165
In order to make such a claim you have to deny the last 2 years of Congressional investigation into Benghazi, her private email server, and her bank accounts (private and the foundation).
You mean a few shows are allowed to air which portray a different view? Compare to what, CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, The NY Times, the NY Post, the Washing Times, the Washington Post, the Globe, Huffpo, virtually every radio station allowed to air? That is "balance" for you? Really?
Why not ask the State Department for the emails then? Oh wait.. they have been busy working with the DOJ and FBI to destroy evidence and hand out immunity like candy.
I don't hear from anyone who believes that, and I don't live in an echo chamber. Alternative media views and reads have ballooned over the last few months because people don't trust what they hear on most media outlets. Why do you think the US transferred ICANN and IANA? Why do you think they actively censor? I notice you don't bother mentioning or fighting those facts.
It may not be enough people in time to save the country, but at least many of us try. You on the other hand are happy to be a puppet believing everything you are told. Ask the Germans, Russians, Chinese, Cambodians, Valenzuelan, how it turned out when they let their "betters" handle things. You will deserve everything coming to you, and you probably won't like it very much.
Not many believe Trump is clean, and quite frankly very few care. They only care that Hillary is much dirtier, and the establishment is out of control with corruption. When the majority of media ignores wrong doing on Clinton's side and happy to share allegations on the other we have a huge imbalance. This imbalance is not new, and not imaginary. You have the current sitting President denouncing any and all opposing positions by name and station. "If I listened to Fox news I wouldn't like me either." is a direct quote from last week.
Force MSM to talk about issues instead of identity politics, or not. But you should at least maintain the same standards for both candidates.
Americans are fed up with corruption, and while Trump may not be "the" answer he is the only chance we have. Hillary was INSTALLED by the media and DNC despite popular opinion. Look at the Super Delegates, 100% win streak on coin tosses card flips and dice rolls to win in addition to the exposed collusion between the DNC, Hillary, and MSM (yes, that same media which has become a propaganda outlet). Now that same establishment wishes to INSTALL Clinton to the highest office in the land. THAT SHOULD SCARE THE SHIT OUT OF YOU!
Believe Assange? Are you asking if we believe the email dumps are real of if we like the guy personally? I don't know him personally but respect his rights to speech, just like I respect yours. Your question is invalid given the subject matter at hand.
Do I believe the emails are real? Yes, I do. These dumps are as damaging to other high level politicians as they are Hillary. They demonstrate very clearly how far into the Banana Republic the USA has already gone.
Do I believe the emails are damaging to those in the same Banana Republic? Yes, which is why they have thus far dominated media coverage to generate appeals to emotion against one opponent and ignored the emails and even the published policies by the candidate they wish to install.
Do I think you get it, comprehend how far gone the USA really is, or care? Nah, not a chance.
Why is asking people to follow basic common sense and law a crusade? That is what you should be asking yourself. There is a reason we have a codified statement regarding due process and the presumption of innocence. This really should not be a crusade, but a reminder.
Explaining virtually every spear phishing plan ever run on people for the last 20 years proves nothing. Who-is data for the domain they claim responsible is registered in France, not Russia. Registered to one "sacko.fatou17@yahoo.fr". Domain created 22FEB2012 and expires on 22FEB17. I'll paste more below just in case, but neither the name or the address of the registrant relate to Russia. Fatou is an older family name in France. You want to convince me it's Russian they need to do better than common knowledge. They make it sound like copying a Google page is hard, when in fact it's as simple as "save-as" and downloading a couple of pictures from the same source.
Domain Name: GOOGLE-ACCOUNT.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1703474033_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.register.it
Registrar URL: http://we.register.it/
Updated Date: 2016-03-26T00:00:00Z
Creation Date: 2012-02-22T00:00:00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2017-02-22T00:00:00Z
Registrar: REGISTER.IT S.P.A.
Registrar IANA ID: 168
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse[at]register.it
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +39.0353230310
Reseller:
Domain Status: ok
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Google-Account
Registrant Organization: Google-Account
Registrant Street: 12 Allée des Noisetiers
Registrant City: St denis en val
Registrant State/Province: Haut-Rhin
Registrant Postal Code: 45160
Registrant Country: FR
Registrant Phone: +33.489750045
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email:
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Google Account
Admin Organization: Google Account
Admin Street: 12 Allée des Noisetiers
Admin City: St denis en val
Admin State/Province: Haut-Rhin
Admin Postal Code: 45160
Admin Country: FR
Admin Phone: +33.489750045
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email:
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Technical Support
Tech Organization: AMEN.FR
Tech Street: 12-14, Rond Point des Champs Elysees
Tech City: PARIS
Tech State/Province: PARIS
Tech Postal Code: 75008
Tech Country: FR
Tech Phone: +33.811887744
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax: +33.140877689
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email:
Name Server: NS1.AMENWORLD.COM
Name Server: NS2.AMENWORLD.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
You are a bigboy and can find wikileaks, Senate transcripts, and Congress transcripts all by yourself. When Trump is alleged to say something, I read the transcripts and watch the full speeches. Just like you could do. I should not have to list sources, because they are root sources. The same sources others can use, and use pretty regularly, to come up with opinions you won't find on NBC, or in The Globe, or Huffpo, or any of the other leftist sources. Amazing what you can learn if you try, but you won't. Easier to believe what you are told and hope for your cookie.
The sex tape is freely available because it was aired on public TV. He did not lie about telling people to look, he told the biased moderator that he pointed at a publicly aired TV show demonstrating the character of the person making the apparently false allegation of impropriety.
Try really hard to establish facts during dialogue instead of pretending everything you hear is true.
The Progressive Trolls are all over this post, you appear to be just another dumbass.
Sorry, but the email scandal has been ongoing for 2 years and is not a new revelation or allegation. The only new part is that emails have now been leaked which seem to give credence to the earlier concerns of corruption and collusion.
These two sets of allegations are in no way equal, and the weight of these implications has completely different outcomes for the United States of America. If Trump is guilty of groping women we have a candidate who as worst case would be similar to the Progressive/Democratic hero Bill Clinton. In the other case, we have a complete collapse of the United States of America. Open collusion with money to install a person of their choosing instead of the People's voice in a Democracy. Open borders and the destruction of the struggling lower and middle classes. Selling of State influence to the highest bidder so that the installed candidate can enrich themselves as they see fit (assuming they continue to do the bidding of the money that got them into office). It's is a Banana Republic verses a Democratic Republic.
I'll give you that one side is a distraction, but not the other. Their own words are corroborating allegation, it's not just hear-say.
Web Site Title: Progressive news and media coverage on Crooks and Liars (From DNS: here.) Owned and operated by the Progressive Rag Huffpo's own John Amato.
When you start with a bias you end with a bias. Shill much? Yeah...
They are desperately trying to add credibility to the narrative of "Russia did it" so that people stop looking at the contents of the email. As I have stated at a staggering frequency in posts lately, the media is no different than the Pravda we used to mock. What we are witnessing is not simply appalling, it's outright frightening.
You would be better off to shill someone else' comments. The best you can get from Politifact on the issue is that she may not have "intentionally" lied. Given the person's continual stream of lies, I find it highly dubious that it was intentional.
Come on now, everyone saw plain as day that a CNN employee gave Trump a setup question in the 2nd debate. These people were already waiting in the wings to promote the narrative. The most recent allegation has already been proven to lack merit because the person was emailing Trump and praising Trump just prior to making allegations. The oldest case lacks merit due to the age of the case and the unlikely event that in the late 70s men could freely grope women on an airplane and nobody would say anything. The alleged abuse of the former Ms Universe also turned out it lacked merit and the person making the allegations fabricated at least portions of her so called testimony. When the testimony is hear-say it is fair that we scrutinize the allegations before throwing mud.
Lets not forget that the left in general has a long history of using bogus allegations for the purpose of winning elections. Look at the people who ran against Obama for example, where he gained a Senate seat by making up allegations weeks before elections. How about the false allegations used against Romney in his race for President. They also have a history of making allegations against their side vanish from headlines until too late. Again, Clinton is the easy target with the media claiming all of the sexual misconduct and perjury charges against him were fabricated by sluts and evil right wingers. And hey, don't all men get blowjobs from interns and use their private parts as cigar holders? You prudes that believe otherwise are nothing but right wing Religious nutjobs. Unless its the Conservative/Republican they wish to accuse.
Once again, we have real facts to back allegations of not just Clinton's wrong doing but high ranking officials in several departments including the State Department, Justice Department, and the head of the FBI. Those are not hear-say allegations, they are based on evidence. Sure, the evidence would not be admissible on its own but it should have already resulted in Grand Jury hearings, suspensions, and confiscation of data from those same parties which could be used as evidence.
If you are not outraged at the current system, you are a fool.
You do realized that registered accounts receive email when people respond to their posts right? Or would you rather believe that the sanity police are watching your every move?
Most of us have to go read the actual sources because there is virtually no real journalism in the US. Stop pretending that the only options are the furthest right compared to the left. Believe it or not, even while being taught compliance we learned to read. Anyone who understands the goals of the left understands what I just stated regarding compliance with education. We can't get that from media because media refuses to talk about real issues in a factual way. We get to these conclusions by using logic and reason while evaluating evidence.
Frankly the whole conspiracy theory is disgusting. A person is murdered and jump with glee at the opportunity to hijack their memory for you dumbass conspiracy theory.
Sounds just like Benghazi and a movie doesn't it? The establishment jailed the person who made the shitty movie, Hillary remains at large.
I did not make a single mention of Hillary killing anyone. I eluded to a strange murder related to the DNC leaks to discredit the allegation that Russia is responsible.
Go take your medication and leave the sane people alone.
Slashdot Mirror
Please give me a book and discount her sources. If you can't, then you have no clue what journalism is or interest in challenging your own position.
Yes, there is ample proof on steroids. If you care to disprove the emails that Wikileaks is dumping, Congressional Testimony from her, Comey, Gowdy, Lynch, et.al? I'd put them on par but Hillary has been a Politician and associated with Politics since she was a teenager. Wow, a book on Donald Trump which probably takes a bunch from his auto biography. Care to perform a basic book title search on the nasty crap about the Clinton's? Pick any book by Ann Coulter who is a journalist and lists hundreds to thousands of sources in every book. These are not the hype books like the Clinton Cash which may be fluffed narratives, there are literally hundreds of books written about or mentioning Clinton Corruption. "No One Left to Lie To", "Guilty as Sin", "Crisis of Character", "Partners in Crime", and again every single Ann Coulter books including "High Crimes and Misdemeanors". Those are off the top of my head.
Compared to a Businessman who has not used Political office to get rich I think the corrupt pick is obvious. Have doubts, get reading!
Good grief, Check BASIC FACTS! I'll post two sources so that you can't complain about bias in the first. Seriously, do you know how to type two words into a fucking search engine?
http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...
http://www.wsj.com/articles/an-internet-giveaway-to-the-u-n-1472421165
In order to make such a claim you have to deny the last 2 years of Congressional investigation into Benghazi, her private email server, and her bank accounts (private and the foundation).
You mean a few shows are allowed to air which portray a different view? Compare to what, CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, The NY Times, the NY Post, the Washing Times, the Washington Post, the Globe, Huffpo, virtually every radio station allowed to air? That is "balance" for you? Really?
Why not ask the State Department for the emails then? Oh wait.. they have been busy working with the DOJ and FBI to destroy evidence and hand out immunity like candy.
I don't hear from anyone who believes that, and I don't live in an echo chamber. Alternative media views and reads have ballooned over the last few months because people don't trust what they hear on most media outlets. Why do you think the US transferred ICANN and IANA? Why do you think they actively censor? I notice you don't bother mentioning or fighting those facts.
It may not be enough people in time to save the country, but at least many of us try. You on the other hand are happy to be a puppet believing everything you are told. Ask the Germans, Russians, Chinese, Cambodians, Valenzuelan, how it turned out when they let their "betters" handle things. You will deserve everything coming to you, and you probably won't like it very much.
Not many believe Trump is clean, and quite frankly very few care. They only care that Hillary is much dirtier, and the establishment is out of control with corruption. When the majority of media ignores wrong doing on Clinton's side and happy to share allegations on the other we have a huge imbalance. This imbalance is not new, and not imaginary. You have the current sitting President denouncing any and all opposing positions by name and station. "If I listened to Fox news I wouldn't like me either." is a direct quote from last week.
Force MSM to talk about issues instead of identity politics, or not. But you should at least maintain the same standards for both candidates.
Americans are fed up with corruption, and while Trump may not be "the" answer he is the only chance we have. Hillary was INSTALLED by the media and DNC despite popular opinion. Look at the Super Delegates, 100% win streak on coin tosses card flips and dice rolls to win in addition to the exposed collusion between the DNC, Hillary, and MSM (yes, that same media which has become a propaganda outlet). Now that same establishment wishes to INSTALL Clinton to the highest office in the land. THAT SHOULD SCARE THE SHIT OUT OF YOU!
Believe Assange? Are you asking if we believe the email dumps are real of if we like the guy personally? I don't know him personally but respect his rights to speech, just like I respect yours. Your question is invalid given the subject matter at hand.
Do I believe the emails are real? Yes, I do. These dumps are as damaging to other high level politicians as they are Hillary. They demonstrate very clearly how far into the Banana Republic the USA has already gone.
Do I believe the emails are damaging to those in the same Banana Republic? Yes, which is why they have thus far dominated media coverage to generate appeals to emotion against one opponent and ignored the emails and even the published policies by the candidate they wish to install.
Do I think you get it, comprehend how far gone the USA really is, or care? Nah, not a chance.
So character assassination is fine if it's the person you dislike. Got it!
Why is asking people to follow basic common sense and law a crusade? That is what you should be asking yourself. There is a reason we have a codified statement regarding due process and the presumption of innocence. This really should not be a crusade, but a reminder.
Was she a complete failure back then? Or is she lying now?
What is "both"?
now tell me about what I win Alex!
Explaining virtually every spear phishing plan ever run on people for the last 20 years proves nothing. Who-is data for the domain they claim responsible is registered in France, not Russia. Registered to one "sacko.fatou17@yahoo.fr". Domain created 22FEB2012 and expires on 22FEB17. I'll paste more below just in case, but neither the name or the address of the registrant relate to Russia. Fatou is an older family name in France. You want to convince me it's Russian they need to do better than common knowledge. They make it sound like copying a Google page is hard, when in fact it's as simple as "save-as" and downloading a couple of pictures from the same source.
Domain Name: GOOGLE-ACCOUNT.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1703474033_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.register.it
Registrar URL: http://we.register.it/
Updated Date: 2016-03-26T00:00:00Z
Creation Date: 2012-02-22T00:00:00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2017-02-22T00:00:00Z
Registrar: REGISTER.IT S.P.A.
Registrar IANA ID: 168
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse[at]register.it
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +39.0353230310
Reseller:
Domain Status: ok
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Google-Account
Registrant Organization: Google-Account
Registrant Street: 12 Allée des Noisetiers
Registrant City: St denis en val
Registrant State/Province: Haut-Rhin
Registrant Postal Code: 45160
Registrant Country: FR
Registrant Phone: +33.489750045
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email:
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Google Account
Admin Organization: Google Account
Admin Street: 12 Allée des Noisetiers
Admin City: St denis en val
Admin State/Province: Haut-Rhin
Admin Postal Code: 45160
Admin Country: FR
Admin Phone: +33.489750045
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email:
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Technical Support
Tech Organization: AMEN.FR
Tech Street: 12-14, Rond Point des Champs Elysees
Tech City: PARIS
Tech State/Province: PARIS
Tech Postal Code: 75008
Tech Country: FR
Tech Phone: +33.811887744
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax: +33.140877689
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email:
Name Server: NS1.AMENWORLD.COM
Name Server: NS2.AMENWORLD.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
You are a bigboy and can find wikileaks, Senate transcripts, and Congress transcripts all by yourself. When Trump is alleged to say something, I read the transcripts and watch the full speeches. Just like you could do. I should not have to list sources, because they are root sources. The same sources others can use, and use pretty regularly, to come up with opinions you won't find on NBC, or in The Globe, or Huffpo, or any of the other leftist sources. Amazing what you can learn if you try, but you won't. Easier to believe what you are told and hope for your cookie.
Liar
The sex tape is freely available because it was aired on public TV. He did not lie about telling people to look, he told the biased moderator that he pointed at a publicly aired TV show demonstrating the character of the person making the apparently false allegation of impropriety.
Try really hard to establish facts during dialogue instead of pretending everything you hear is true.
The Progressive Trolls are all over this post, you appear to be just another dumbass.
Sorry, but the email scandal has been ongoing for 2 years and is not a new revelation or allegation. The only new part is that emails have now been leaked which seem to give credence to the earlier concerns of corruption and collusion.
These two sets of allegations are in no way equal, and the weight of these implications has completely different outcomes for the United States of America. If Trump is guilty of groping women we have a candidate who as worst case would be similar to the Progressive/Democratic hero Bill Clinton. In the other case, we have a complete collapse of the United States of America. Open collusion with money to install a person of their choosing instead of the People's voice in a Democracy. Open borders and the destruction of the struggling lower and middle classes. Selling of State influence to the highest bidder so that the installed candidate can enrich themselves as they see fit (assuming they continue to do the bidding of the money that got them into office). It's is a Banana Republic verses a Democratic Republic.
I'll give you that one side is a distraction, but not the other. Their own words are corroborating allegation, it's not just hear-say.
Web Site Title: Progressive news and media coverage on Crooks and Liars (From DNS: here.) Owned and operated by the Progressive Rag Huffpo's own John Amato.
When you start with a bias you end with a bias. Shill much? Yeah...
They are desperately trying to add credibility to the narrative of "Russia did it" so that people stop looking at the contents of the email. As I have stated at a staggering frequency in posts lately, the media is no different than the Pravda we used to mock. What we are witnessing is not simply appalling, it's outright frightening.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/10/22/transcript-clinton-testifies-before-house-committee-on-benghazi/
You would be better off to shill someone else' comments. The best you can get from Politifact on the issue is that she may not have "intentionally" lied. Given the person's continual stream of lies, I find it highly dubious that it was intentional.
Come on now, everyone saw plain as day that a CNN employee gave Trump a setup question in the 2nd debate. These people were already waiting in the wings to promote the narrative. The most recent allegation has already been proven to lack merit because the person was emailing Trump and praising Trump just prior to making allegations. The oldest case lacks merit due to the age of the case and the unlikely event that in the late 70s men could freely grope women on an airplane and nobody would say anything. The alleged abuse of the former Ms Universe also turned out it lacked merit and the person making the allegations fabricated at least portions of her so called testimony. When the testimony is hear-say it is fair that we scrutinize the allegations before throwing mud.
Lets not forget that the left in general has a long history of using bogus allegations for the purpose of winning elections. Look at the people who ran against Obama for example, where he gained a Senate seat by making up allegations weeks before elections. How about the false allegations used against Romney in his race for President. They also have a history of making allegations against their side vanish from headlines until too late. Again, Clinton is the easy target with the media claiming all of the sexual misconduct and perjury charges against him were fabricated by sluts and evil right wingers. And hey, don't all men get blowjobs from interns and use their private parts as cigar holders? You prudes that believe otherwise are nothing but right wing Religious nutjobs. Unless its the Conservative/Republican they wish to accuse.
Once again, we have real facts to back allegations of not just Clinton's wrong doing but high ranking officials in several departments including the State Department, Justice Department, and the head of the FBI. Those are not hear-say allegations, they are based on evidence. Sure, the evidence would not be admissible on its own but it should have already resulted in Grand Jury hearings, suspensions, and confiscation of data from those same parties which could be used as evidence.
If you are not outraged at the current system, you are a fool.
You do realized that registered accounts receive email when people respond to their posts right? Or would you rather believe that the sanity police are watching your every move?
Most of us have to go read the actual sources because there is virtually no real journalism in the US. Stop pretending that the only options are the furthest right compared to the left. Believe it or not, even while being taught compliance we learned to read. Anyone who understands the goals of the left understands what I just stated regarding compliance with education. We can't get that from media because media refuses to talk about real issues in a factual way. We get to these conclusions by using logic and reason while evaluating evidence.
Frankly the whole conspiracy theory is disgusting. A person is murdered and jump with glee at the opportunity to hijack their memory for you dumbass conspiracy theory.
Sounds just like Benghazi and a movie doesn't it? The establishment jailed the person who made the shitty movie, Hillary remains at large.
I did not make a single mention of Hillary killing anyone. I eluded to a strange murder related to the DNC leaks to discredit the allegation that Russia is responsible.
Go take your medication and leave the sane people alone.
NBC and Joe Biden are absolutely the worst type of Trolls. SJWs unite and take them down!