If it seems to good to be true....
on
419 Scam Blow-by-Blow
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
I'm not the most careful person in the world, and I often do dumb things, but when it comes to my money I try and make sure that something is legit. Services like Paypal aside, why on earth would you want to pick a bank that you can't actually go to their physical location?
Maybe I'm just ignorant and need to get on the all spam is telling the truth bandwagon....
Could it be that Intel is keeping DDR2-667 support for yet another revision of their new chipsets even though the memory support is clearly here today?"
Wow, a company may be holding back on technology for a future money making opportunity? This has never happened before!
Maybe it's just me, but why does the government have to make laws that force you to do things that are right, or good. Also why is it suck a concern that they make sure there is no indecent broadcast shown? I understand keeping surveillance tapes and such for criminal purposes, but making stations keep records of their broadcast for 90 day, just so 3 months down the road I can make a legal case if their was some indecent material. That seems like the justice system has way too much free time to blow on worthless issues, but I guess that's nothing new.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm not the most careful person in the world, and I often do dumb things, but when it comes to my money I try and make sure that something is legit. Services like Paypal aside, why on earth would you want to pick a bank that you can't actually go to their physical location?
Maybe I'm just ignorant and need to get on the all spam is telling the truth bandwagon....
Could it be that Intel is keeping DDR2-667 support for yet another revision of their new chipsets even though the memory support is clearly here today?"
Wow, a company may be holding back on technology for a future money making opportunity? This has never happened before!
Maybe it's just me, but why does the government have to make laws that force you to do things that are right, or good. Also why is it suck a concern that they make sure there is no indecent broadcast shown? I understand keeping surveillance tapes and such for criminal purposes, but making stations keep records of their broadcast for 90 day, just so 3 months down the road I can make a legal case if their was some indecent material. That seems like the justice system has way too much free time to blow on worthless issues, but I guess that's nothing new.