Maybe this has already been well discussed, but why doesn't Wikipedia use a system of meta-moderation like slashdot?
Before a change was accepted it would have to pass some other random moderators check, who would simply approve or disaprove whether or not the content seemed plausible.
What do you think? What do I not know about this debate?
Maybe this has already been well discussed, but why doesn't Wikipedia use a system of meta-moderation like slashdot? Before a change was accepted it would have to pass some other random moderators check, who would simply approve or disaprove whether or not the content seemed plausible. What do you think? What do I not know about this debate?
who didn't live out their Civ strategies in their dreams?