Slashdot Mirror


User: juuri

juuri's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
879
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 879

  1. Elitism is a sure sign of a weak mind on Descent Into Linux (Part Two) · · Score: 1

    Oh please, welcome to the real world. There are no weak minds in the fact that Katz brings down the technical level of slashdot everytime he posts.

    Like it or not Slashdot *DOES* cater to a minority. Would you honestly like it to be differnet? Do you want to read the drivel in the CNN Tech section? Or the mindless rants of numerous hacks from ZDNET or wired?

    Katz is a useless addition to slashdot. He offers nothing except pedantic fodder written only to entertain himself and the other "windoze converts" out there.

  2. Enough is enough. on Descent Into Linux (Part Two) · · Score: 1

    Okay Jon. Enough is most certainly enough. Not only has the quality of your "articles" become
    even lower than before but now what little content they had appropriate for slashdot has completely vanished.

    In case you haven't noticed slashdot (for better or worse) is aimed at the technically savvy. Not at the average consumer who needs someone to assemble a pc for them and can't even smash return 20 or 30 times and get redhat installed. Slashdot isn't for you. It *ISN'T* for everyone. If it was for everyone it would end up getting so amazingly watered down we would be left with something even worse than ZDNET.

    So Jon, please cease your innane ramblings. They do not belong here. When you have something new to tell me about new G3 or alpha chips or you can contribute something cool about the new HTML->potscript engine you wrote last night then you can come back and annoy us again. Until then please stick to reading the TECH section on CNN and posting your drivel to the masses who don't know any better.

    Because we do know better.

  3. Slashdot users and lack of style. on PC style as important as Clock Speed · · Score: 1

    Learn to read. I was commenting on workstations not PeeCees or macs.

    Coming soon on slashdot! Reading Comprehension!!

  4. Slashdot users and lack of style. on PC style as important as Clock Speed · · Score: 1

    You know sometimes I wonder what the background is of the typical slashdot poster. Why? Because they seem to have no sense of real computing history... well that and a complete and total lack of understanding of the common computer user. Of *course* style is important. This is regardless of the OS or the hardware inside. If any of you had used anything besides PeeCees you would understand this. Having owned one of almost every major workstation line made (except hp boxen)... style is *very* important to me. "Oh but what about the insides you whine?" What do I care? Each of these boxes have had unix and scsi under the hood. As a serious computer user (which many slashdot users claim to be but obviously aren't) workstations have met all my requirements for years and they still continue to.

    So since they are all the same how do they distinguish themselves? Easily *style*. How many of you have ever spent significant time in front of a NeXT? Steve Jobs recognized way back in 91 that if you make something visually appealing as well as having great utilitarian value then you can make something that will last long past its usefulness. SGI and sun have done the same... whereas most people with PeeCees want towers they hide under the desk, workstation owners are proud about the machine they have on their desk. Serious computers users do care about style.

    And the common user? Who are they? They are the 99.99999% of the population that will never read (or care to read) a site like slashdot. They are the people who just want a computer that they can send email on, view the web, make pretty graphs and do taxes. You do not need a PII 350Mhz for this. Microsoft is the reason you do. The point is just *like* a car... if it does what you need then style is damn important.