Slashdot Mirror


User: rayver

rayver's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
12
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 12

  1. Re:Pictures on China Censors Web To Curb Inner Mongolia Protests · · Score: 1
  2. Re:Pictures on China Censors Web To Curb Inner Mongolia Protests · · Score: 1

    Oh and a video from someone inside mongolia! http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/05/30/china.martial.law/

  3. Pictures on China Censors Web To Curb Inner Mongolia Protests · · Score: 2

    Looks like there's pictures and a small blip of text about it here: http://www.innermongolia.org/english/index.html It also looks like all Chinese news sites (.cn) are censoring any mention of it as well.

  4. Apple profits either way.. on Apple Believes Someone Is Behind Psystar · · Score: 1

    What I don't understand is that Apple is going to win either way. If Psystar wins, they'll still be paying Apple licensing fees for the OSX software. For every clone they sell, Apple makes a small cut. Sure, Apple is going to lose exclusive sales of their already expensive equipment, but it would make them more competitive. They would have to compete separately in the OS market (designing OS's so that PC users can decide whether Windows/Linux/OSX is better, and designing systems so that PC users will think Apple is worth it compared to Dell, Gateway, Acer, IBM, etc.). Apple is only putting up a fight as a barrier to their systems. Since Microsoft allows Windows to be installed on Apple systems, it's only fair that apple allow OSX to be installed on other systems as well. If Microsoft sued Apple for allowing windows to be installed on their systems, there would not be as high of a demand for Apple systems. I truly see this as an unfair competitive advantage that Apple currently holds.

  5. Re:Research paper here on Robot Dogs Evolve Their Own Language · · Score: 2, Informative

    Information about the actual AIBO setup:
    http://www.csl.sony.fr/perspective/
    Videos here: http://www.csl.sony.fr/perspective/node6.html

  6. Research paper here on Robot Dogs Evolve Their Own Language · · Score: 1

    I haven't gotten the chance to read this thoroughly, but I think this is the research paper the article was referring to:
    http://ecagents.istc.cnr.it/imgs/blu_paper.pdf

  7. Profiling Morgellons.org on Parasitic Infection Flummoxes Victims and Doctors · · Score: 1

    Seems like archive.org has a good history of page changes Morgellons.org has undergone. Anyway, around 2002, contact information was listed:

    Contact us at Morgellons@aol.com or fax to (760) 457-3441

    This website designed and maintained by Amy De Ferrari. Contact her at amy_de_ferrari@hotmail.com

    You are visitor number

    ====

    Now I'm curious about who this Amy De Ferrari preson is. If you google for Amy De Ferrari, you'll find this site and a curious entry about the site being taken down. I wonder...
    www.amydeferrari.com

  8. Places discussion on Places Feature Cut From Firefox 2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case someone is looking for more information about the actual implementation of the "places" concept: http://wiki.mozilla.org/Talk:Places:Design_Overvie w http://wiki.mozilla.org/Places:Design_Overview

  9. Faking slashdot on Faking a Company · · Score: 2, Informative

    Speaking of which, there's also a Chinese group trying to fake slashdot: http://www.slashdot.cn which redirects to: http://solidot.org/

  10. Re:More information and Video coverage here on DARPA Grand Challenge Finalists Announced · · Score: 3, Informative

    oops.. didn't realize the NQEfinal paper and the grandchallenge links were already provided. Anyway, some more links (to articles):

    http://www.tgdaily.com/2005/10/06/darpa2005_featur e_update/

    "Blue Team" runs self-righting motorcycle at darpa Grand Challenge
    http://www.tgdaily.com/2005/10/03/darpa2005_featur e_update/

    DARPA Grand Challenge update #3: Interview with Team Cornell
    http://www.tgdaily.com/2005/10/02/darpa_cornell_in terview/

    DARPA Grand Challenge update #2: A chat with Team Mojavaton
    http://www.tgdaily.com/2005/10/02/darpa_grand_chal lenge_update2/

    DARPA Grand Challenge Update #1: Qualification Day 1 results
    http://www.tgdaily.com/2005/10/02/darpa_grand_chal lenge_update1/

    Gearing up for the DARPA Grand Challenge:
    http://www.tgdaily.com/2005/10/01/darpa_grand_chal lenge_introduction/

  11. More information and Video coverage here on DARPA Grand Challenge Finalists Announced · · Score: 5, Informative

    Video coverage here (there's a whole bunch. The overview, stanley and ghostrider ones are awesome!):

    http://www.cartv.com.nyud.net:8090/content/researc h/channels/index.cfm/channel/cartv_video/action/sh owvideo/vid/e_0145/vcat/Event/
    NQE final paper:

    http://www.darpa.mil/grandchallenge/NQEfinal1.pdf

    And more announcements can be found on:

    http://www.grandchallenge.org/

    Also, a good summary of things that have been happening can be found in the discussion forum:

    https://dtsn.darpa.mil/grandc/forum/topic.asp?topi c_id=1636&forum_id=30&Topic_Title=NQE&forum_title= Grand+Challenge+Event&M=False&S=

    =====
    A post by Espina reads:
    Hi! ...stopped by the NQE last week and this whole Tuesday and I must say that all the work accomplished on all the AGVs was very impressive. ...for those who couldn't be there the following bots all had runs in the morning session: "Mojavaton, DAD, CIMAR, Insight Racing, Golem Group, ENSCO, Princeton, MonsterMoto, Team Jefferson, UCF,, AION, Cajunbot, Banzai, Gray Team, Mitre Meteorites, Virginia Tech Grand Challenge Team, Austin Robot, Desert Buckeyes." All had full runs except five. Majavaton and Insight Racing which both collided with a vehicle/obstacle within 100 yards of the finish line. Aion decided to skip the course and circle back directly to the finish line but a K- rail barrier refused to co-operate. The UCF bot went walkabout on the back 40 towards the NASCAR track and Austin Robotics got sulky in the first loop when the crowd left for lunch during its run. MonsterMoto was given a restart because a chase truck encroached on the route near the start. ...according to some team members from Ensco, the afternoon session was a chance for the teams "on the cusp" to improve their standings. Austin Robotics, CajunBot, VT, Team Banzai, Mojavaton, the Mitre Group, and the Gray Team all had additional runs. ...Mojavaton, VT, Mitre (had two) and the Gray Team all had full runs. The Gray Team had two runs but was unable to to get GPS back after the tunnel on the first run so they made a few adjustments and had a stellar 2nd run. It seemed like a time/constelation problem. CajunBot made it to the last Obstacle/vehicle to the chagrin of the crowd. Team Banzai froze contemplating a witch's hat on a downhill transition at the end of the first loop and Austin Robotics lost GPS (and its way) after the tunnel... ...after that the best of the rest ran (Autonosys, Blue Team, Overbot, Indiana Robotic NAV, BJB Engineering, Team Juggernaut, Autonomous Vehicle Systems, Team Tormenta, Indy Robot Racing, Terra Engineering, PVHA Road Warriors, CyberRider, AI Motorvators, Team Underdawg. )with most of the teams wiping out the first barrier, and/or re-arranging the hay bales at the tunnel entrance, colliding with the tunnel entrance and losing GPS after the tunnel. However, IT, from AI motorvaters had a full run on the shortened RDDF and TerraHawk made it thru most of the hard parts. Overbot ran very thoroughly and cautiously but froze on the downhill transition. ...if any of this information is incorrect please feel free to fix...I could be suffering the effects of sunstroke... ...anyhow, good luck all and I admire dedication of all of the teams on completing an AGV. ...see y'all in Primm, Espina

  12. Re:I don't get it on Robots that Lust and Reproduce · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's another article here that provides a little bit more detail. It's pretty much software... a quick snippet from that article to summarize it all: "The artificial chromosome is a software system. It means that the information - their 'genes' - can be easily sent to other robots," he said. "So if I send the chromosomes to another robot, that robot can then reproduce by itself. In that sense the robots will be created by the 'genes'. The personality of robots will be created by artificial genes." Dr Kim said there was no danger that such self-reproducing robots would take over the world as portrayed in movies such as this year's blockbuster I, Robot. "If we design the chromosomes quite safely, then we can avoid such a bad situation," he said.