So you write shit code that doesn't fit the standards ("liberal" code), your shitty compiler doesn't notice and compiles it anyway, and then it's Microsoft's fault when their standards conforming compiler won't compile it?
I develop software for Windows using MinGW and MSys. They provide everything I need for development, apart from the IDE, and this release from Microsoft doesn't include that.
The Visual C++ compiler is good, but it isn't extrordinary. Why use it over the open source MinGW tools?
The double negative makes his point, moron. He would not mind not having something he doesn't like. If you remove one of those negatives, for example, he would mind not having something he doesn't like, it shows you the opposite of what he wants.
How would that work? One person presses a key, switches the KVM, then the other person gets their turn to press a key and perhaps move the mouse, they switch the KVM, and guy 1 gets to press another key...
Stupid!
Isn't there a legal state that if you have a patent pending (in the system but not approved yet) you can use it as if it were approved until they decide.
Ever seen "patent pending" on a product?
Why aren't patents exposed to peer review, like academic articles are?
The invention (if it is) will be protected by the patent pending laws while it's reviewed.
Slashdot Mirror
The command line C++ compiler was never included in the SDK. The C# compiler and so on were, however.
So you write shit code that doesn't fit the standards ("liberal" code), your shitty compiler doesn't notice and compiles it anyway, and then it's Microsoft's fault when their standards conforming compiler won't compile it?
I develop software for Windows using MinGW and MSys. They provide everything I need for development, apart from the IDE, and this release from Microsoft doesn't include that. The Visual C++ compiler is good, but it isn't extrordinary. Why use it over the open source MinGW tools?
The double negative makes his point, moron. He would not mind not having something he doesn't like. If you remove one of those negatives, for example, he would mind not having something he doesn't like, it shows you the opposite of what he wants.
Three years! Any half decent programmer could pick up C++ in a month with a toy project, easily.
How would that work? One person presses a key, switches the KVM, then the other person gets their turn to press a key and perhaps move the mouse, they switch the KVM, and guy 1 gets to press another key... Stupid!
Isn't there a legal state that if you have a patent pending (in the system but not approved yet) you can use it as if it were approved until they decide. Ever seen "patent pending" on a product?
Why aren't patents exposed to peer review, like academic articles are? The invention (if it is) will be protected by the patent pending laws while it's reviewed.