Wow really? The crime is having classified email on the server. Removing the markings does not mean the content is no longer classified. Fucking moron.
Partisanship? Really? This is President Obama's Justice Department! Who the hell is that partisan? Jesus Christ people take you head out of your asses. The FBI and the Justice Department are investigating Clinton not the GOP Congress. This is a criminal investigation. They are seeking testimony from Bryan Pagliano. He's not been charged with anything, nor is this a court proceeding. It's an INVESTIGATION. They can't force him to say anything because you know the Fifth Amendment. Congress wanted his testimony but he asserted his Fifth Amendment right. So in exchange for his testimony the Justice Department gave him immunity.
Do you understand now jackass. Nothing you said was correct except innocent until proven guilty. But then Clinton hasn't been charged, if ever. Right now, it's an investigation.
"But the details in those "Classified" stamps — which include a string of dates, letters and numbers describing the nature of the classification — appear to undermine this account, a Reuters examination of the emails and the relevant regulations has found.
The new stamps indicate that some of Clinton's emails from her time as the nation's most senior diplomat are filled with a type of information the U.S. government and the department's own regulations automatically deems classified from the get-go — regardless of whether it is already marked that way or not. "
I'm not sure she would beat Trump regardless. Lots of people, both Democrats and Republicans, dislike Clinton. Republican voters are energized and coming out in large numbers. Democrats are not turning out. So in the general election Clinton may lose to Trump. If he could turn down the crazy, he'll kill her.
"Because her server was private, the State Department’s records did not include its contents when responding to Freedom of Information Act requests. The department wrongly told FOIA applicants that no such materials existed. Not only did the materials exist (on Clinton’s server), senior officials knew it and allowed false denials to be made." http://www.realclearpolitics.c...
It's worse: " Because her server was private, the State Department’s records did not include its contents when responding to Freedom of Information Act requests. The department wrongly told FOIA applicants that no such materials existed. Not only did the materials exist (on Clinton’s server), senior officials knew it and allowed false denials to be made." http://www.realclearpolitics.c...
This is the FBI jackass. Not a Congressional investigation. Some emails where classified from the beginning not after the fact. http://www.reuters.com/article... You would know if you bothered to look it up.
"Some of the classified materials on Clinton’s server originated in intelligence agencies outside the State Department and came into the department on a secure, classified network. They were marked as such. They could only be transferred to Clinton’s unsecured network by hand. Each occurrence was a felony. Since the server has now been recovered, the FBI and intelligence agencies know who sent those messages and who received them at the State Department." http://www.realclearpolitics.c...
"Secretary Clinton specifically instructed aides to send her classified materials on that insecure network. We know of at least one such instruction. We don’t know how many others were redacted by the State Department."
http://www.realclearpolitics.c...
You are conflating two investigation. Congress investigated Clinton about Benghazi and subpoenaed her emails. The FBI is investigating the use of a PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER that housed State Department emails, many of which were classified. It's a felony to have classified email on a private email server.
That's not correct. There were document that were classified from the beginning that were on her server. Not documents retroactively classified. This IS a big deal.
LMOL - take a stats course. Jesus you people are fucking morons. You don't need calculus to take Statistics. It might help in understanding the foundations of the distribution theorems but not in the actual statistical model used.
Then you didn't learn anything. Statistics requires critical thinking, which I guess *you* could avoid with Calculus. Odd since areas of Calculus are more than rote memorization.
Depends on the statistics course. At the graduate level you are taking advanced level statistics. So no it would not make more sense. I believe he is arguing for a practical course or applied course in statistics, which there are plenty. Those would be more accessible. But people who have issues with math will still have problems with statistics.
Slashdot Mirror
Wow really? The crime is having classified email on the server. Removing the markings does not mean the content is no longer classified. Fucking moron.
Partisanship? Really? This is President Obama's Justice Department! Who the hell is that partisan? Jesus Christ people take you head out of your asses. The FBI and the Justice Department are investigating Clinton not the GOP Congress. This is a criminal investigation. They are seeking testimony from Bryan Pagliano. He's not been charged with anything, nor is this a court proceeding. It's an INVESTIGATION. They can't force him to say anything because you know the Fifth Amendment. Congress wanted his testimony but he asserted his Fifth Amendment right. So in exchange for his testimony the Justice Department gave him immunity.
Do you understand now jackass. Nothing you said was correct except innocent until proven guilty. But then Clinton hasn't been charged, if ever. Right now, it's an investigation.
Trying do some research Potsy:
"But the details in those "Classified" stamps — which include a string of dates, letters and numbers describing the nature of the classification — appear to undermine this account, a Reuters examination of the emails and the relevant regulations has found.
The new stamps indicate that some of Clinton's emails from her time as the nation's most senior diplomat are filled with a type of information the U.S. government and the department's own regulations automatically deems classified from the get-go — regardless of whether it is already marked that way or not. "
I'm not sure she would beat Trump regardless. Lots of people, both Democrats and Republicans, dislike Clinton. Republican voters are energized and coming out in large numbers. Democrats are not turning out. So in the general election Clinton may lose to Trump. If he could turn down the crazy, he'll kill her.
You mean like Bernie Sanders who beats Trump in all the national polls.
"Intelligence professionals agree the server was almost certainly hacked by foreign agencies—probably by several." http://www.realclearpolitics.c...
Idiots really need to do some research:
"Because her server was private, the State Department’s records did not include its contents when responding to Freedom of Information Act requests. The department wrongly told FOIA applicants that no such materials existed. Not only did the materials exist (on Clinton’s server), senior officials knew it and allowed false denials to be made." http://www.realclearpolitics.c...
She had information that was born classified not retroactively classified. Research before posting.
It's worse: " Because her server was private, the State Department’s records did not include its contents when responding to Freedom of Information Act requests. The department wrongly told FOIA applicants that no such materials existed. Not only did the materials exist (on Clinton’s server), senior officials knew it and allowed false denials to be made." http://www.realclearpolitics.c...
Housing classified information on a personal server is illegal.
This is the FBI jackass. Not a Congressional investigation. Some emails where classified from the beginning not after the fact. http://www.reuters.com/article... You would know if you bothered to look it up.
"Some of the classified materials on Clinton’s server originated in intelligence agencies outside the State Department and came into the department on a secure, classified network. They were marked as such. They could only be transferred to Clinton’s unsecured network by hand. Each occurrence was a felony. Since the server has now been recovered, the FBI and intelligence agencies know who sent those messages and who received them at the State Department." http://www.realclearpolitics.c...
And yet there were emails that were BORN classified that were on her private email server. http://www.reuters.com/article...
Really Potsy:
"Secretary Clinton specifically instructed aides to send her classified materials on that insecure network. We know of at least one such instruction. We don’t know how many others were redacted by the State Department." http://www.realclearpolitics.c...
..or China's Communism...but I guess that's inconvenient to mention that China is a communist country.
You are conflating two investigation. Congress investigated Clinton about Benghazi and subpoenaed her emails. The FBI is investigating the use of a PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER that housed State Department emails, many of which were classified. It's a felony to have classified email on a private email server.
That's not correct. There were document that were classified from the beginning that were on her server. Not documents retroactively classified. This IS a big deal.
The FBI is leading the investigation not the GOP Congress. BIG difference.
LMOL - take a stats course. Jesus you people are fucking morons. You don't need calculus to take Statistics. It might help in understanding the foundations of the distribution theorems but not in the actual statistical model used.
Then you didn't learn anything. Statistics requires critical thinking, which I guess *you* could avoid with Calculus. Odd since areas of Calculus are more than rote memorization.
Look up Logic sometime. It's not algebra.
Depends on the statistics course. At the graduate level you are taking advanced level statistics. So no it would not make more sense. I believe he is arguing for a practical course or applied course in statistics, which there are plenty. Those would be more accessible. But people who have issues with math will still have problems with statistics.
True, though I don't think he was suggesting eliminating all algebra, just advanced algebra or algebra II - whatever that means.
So that explains Romney's loss.....
"That said, an argument can be made that even free broadcast requires one to support manufacturers by purchasing their radios and TVs. "
That high school education paying off for you. Wow just wow. It's called commercials - look them up sometime. That's what pays for content on TV.