IMAX doesn't know trademark law. But for the dumb-asses out there...FTA:
"First of all, this isn't a story about IMAX, and it contains just one (nice!) reference to IMAX. The statement wasn't Ars' speech at all, but one that an Ars writer chose out of many possible interview quotes. But that's all a bit of an aside, because the important point is that despite Ruby's fantastical interpretation of what a trademark means, we're actually allowed to say whatever we want about IMAX. I can say IMAX screens look like SteamVR, or that they look like my 47" Vizio TV, or that they remind me of purple bunnies. We can review IMAX directly, we can compare it to other products, we can love it, we can hate it—all without IMAX's permission."
Listen douche bag, this isn't a new program. The federal Universal Service Fund (USF) to support access to telecommunications services at reasonable rates for those living in rural and high-cost areas, income-eligible consumers, rural health care facilities, and schools and libraries. It's in that vain that the FCC is including broadband access since more and more services are being offered exclusively on-line. Heck good luck still getting a paper bill since most companies and utilities want you to go paperless. So it's needed.
And if you panties are in such a twist how about bitching about the corporate subsidies we give out to ultra wealthy corporations like Exxon Mobile.
Really? Because everything resets and starts with the new administration and nothing should have been done in the past? Today's policy decisions are affected by decisions made in the past.
Or you could read the article that explained it. Wow....
Re:Excellent. Now how about High Fructose Corn Syr
on
FDA Bans Trans Fat
·
· Score: 1
The craving is worse with HFCS. It's been shown to be addictive like. Unlike sugar cane.
Re:Excellent. Now how about High Fructose Corn Syr
on
FDA Bans Trans Fat
·
· Score: 1
I said sugar cane so not sure what you're griping about. FYI when people say "sugar" they typically mean sugar cane.
Re:Excellent. Now how about High Fructose Corn Syr
on
FDA Bans Trans Fat
·
· Score: 1
Check the research on how HFCS is metabolized versus sugar. It's different. Studies have shown that HFCS effects how satiated people feel when eating; people keep eating. This is not the case with sugar. These are facts supported by research. You can stop trolling for the corn industry.
Re:Excellent. Now how about High Fructose Corn Syr
on
FDA Bans Trans Fat
·
· Score: 1
I'm not trying to say sugar is good for you - far from it - but HFCS is worse. If the food manufacturers left sugar as the sweetener instead of switching to HFCS, health problems wouldn't have been as great. Consumption spiked when HFCS was used.
I do agree reducing sugar consumption would be best. It would be nice if sweeteners weren't used everywhere. For example in salad dressings and pasta sauce.
Re:And so the cycle of "reform" continues
on
FDA Bans Trans Fat
·
· Score: 1
You might want to actually look into each of those issues you've cited and see the various forced that were at work. It's not as simple as you've painted it to be.
Re:Wasn't trans fat the thing that was safer than
on
FDA Bans Trans Fat
·
· Score: 1
How about we start with the artificial stuff. It's the artificial stuff that's killing us quickly. The natural stuff seems to take longer.
Re:Excellent. Now how about High Fructose Corn Syr
on
FDA Bans Trans Fat
·
· Score: 1
Problem is people tend to over-eat because of HFCS. People will consumer more because of the HFCS. This is not seen with sugar cane.
Re:Excellent. Now how about High Fructose Corn Syr
on
FDA Bans Trans Fat
·
· Score: 1
No it's not. It's not sugar cane.
Re:Excellent. Now how about High Fructose Corn Syr
on
FDA Bans Trans Fat
·
· Score: 2
HFC is not sugar. It has a different chemical signature and is metabolized differently than sugar. It's actually worse than sugar.
Re:Excellent. Now how about High Fructose Corn Syr
on
FDA Bans Trans Fat
·
· Score: 1
Even in low consumption HFC is bad. Sugar would be a better. HFC is just used everywhere it's hard to get away from - even if you don't drink pop.
Slashdot Mirror
IMAX doesn't know trademark law. But for the dumb-asses out there...FTA:
"First of all, this isn't a story about IMAX, and it contains just one (nice!) reference to IMAX. The statement wasn't Ars' speech at all, but one that an Ars writer chose out of many possible interview quotes. But that's all a bit of an aside, because the important point is that despite Ruby's fantastical interpretation of what a trademark means, we're actually allowed to say whatever we want about IMAX. I can say IMAX screens look like SteamVR, or that they look like my 47" Vizio TV, or that they remind me of purple bunnies. We can review IMAX directly, we can compare it to other products, we can love it, we can hate it—all without IMAX's permission."
RTFA. It has nothing to do with that you fucking troll.
Wow you really are a dumb-ass. RTFA.
Yes, yes you can. You might want to bone up on trade mark law sometime zippy.
You realize those bugs are mutations that allowed "us" to happen. Without them organisms would not have evolved beyond single celled organisms.
Listen douche bag, this isn't a new program. The federal Universal Service Fund (USF) to support access to telecommunications services at reasonable rates for those living in rural and high-cost areas, income-eligible consumers, rural health care facilities, and schools and libraries. It's in that vain that the FCC is including broadband access since more and more services are being offered exclusively on-line. Heck good luck still getting a paper bill since most companies and utilities want you to go paperless. So it's needed.
And if you panties are in such a twist how about bitching about the corporate subsidies we give out to ultra wealthy corporations like Exxon Mobile.
Really? Because everything resets and starts with the new administration and nothing should have been done in the past? Today's policy decisions are affected by decisions made in the past.
Or you could read the article that explained it. Wow....
The craving is worse with HFCS. It's been shown to be addictive like. Unlike sugar cane.
I said sugar cane so not sure what you're griping about. FYI when people say "sugar" they typically mean sugar cane.
Check the research on how HFCS is metabolized versus sugar. It's different. Studies have shown that HFCS effects how satiated people feel when eating; people keep eating. This is not the case with sugar. These are facts supported by research. You can stop trolling for the corn industry.
I'm not trying to say sugar is good for you - far from it - but HFCS is worse. If the food manufacturers left sugar as the sweetener instead of switching to HFCS, health problems wouldn't have been as great. Consumption spiked when HFCS was used.
I do agree reducing sugar consumption would be best. It would be nice if sweeteners weren't used everywhere. For example in salad dressings and pasta sauce.
Fine - shortening containing trans fats http://www.amazon.com/High-Rat...
It's easier to say crisco....
I think you mean the Jeb Bush super pac.
RTFA. It's about food manufactures and they have been moving away from trans fats for sometime. This just makes it official.
Yeah because Republicans never grease the wheels of their donors.....moron.....
Food manufacturers. Need a large supply chain.
You might want to actually look into each of those issues you've cited and see the various forced that were at work. It's not as simple as you've painted it to be.
How about we start with the artificial stuff. It's the artificial stuff that's killing us quickly. The natural stuff seems to take longer.
Problem is people tend to over-eat because of HFCS. People will consumer more because of the HFCS. This is not seen with sugar cane.
No it's not. It's not sugar cane.
HFC is not sugar. It has a different chemical signature and is metabolized differently than sugar. It's actually worse than sugar.
Even in low consumption HFC is bad. Sugar would be a better. HFC is just used everywhere it's hard to get away from - even if you don't drink pop.
How about not as bad.
Which does not make this wrong. The FDA is not the only organization saying trans fats are bad. But I guess you know more than the AMA...