Slashdot Mirror


After Uproar, Disney Cancels Tech Worker Layoffs

An anonymous reader writes: The NY Times previously reported that Disney made laid-off workers train their foreign replacements. The Times now reports that Disney has reversed its decision to lay off the workers and canceled training of the replacements. This follows public uproar, two investigations by the Department of Labor into outsourcing firms, complaints to the Justice Department, and calls for an investigation into the H-1B Visa program by Senator Bill Nelson. One of the workers said, "We were told our jobs were continuing and we should consider it as if nothing had happened until further notice." A former Disney employee who was forced to take an early retirement shared his personal thoughts on the matter in a Google+ post.

229 comments

  1. Don't worry, they'll try again by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the workers said, "We were told our jobs were continuing and we should consider it as if nothing had happened until further notice."

    Yeah, that notice will be updated employment terms to try to aggressive prevent people from leaking out the details when they attempt to do the H1-B swap the next time.

    1. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, no shit .... Disney will just do it more gradually after the uproar dies down.

      This is PR damage control, nothing more.

      Give it six months, and they'll probably still be out of a job.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Trust, it takes a long time to build and just a few seconds to destroy

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    3. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by LaurenCates · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed. I've been through this sort of thing before. Tell the people all is well, even though the boots on the ground know that what's going on doesn't pass the smell test.

      The layoffs will happen, but they will be done more quietly and more gradually. Count on it.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    4. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, they'll likely try to slap an onerous non-compete and NDA into the employment terms as the first wave to weed people out. Then all the people who were too scared of losing their job not to agree will then get silently laid off later.

    5. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by hrvatska · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Disney management will simply wait for the uproar to die down and then start setting vague and aggressive performance objectives for the U.S. workers. They'll then get rid of people via performance review. Workers who had formerly been getting good reviews will suddenly find themselves on notice for not measuring up in Disney's new high performance culture.

    6. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, that notice will be updated employment terms to try to aggressive prevent people from leaking out the details when they attempt to do the H1-B swap the next time.

      Key part of the phrase: "until further notice." My guess is they're going to train all of these H1-B's at a different place, then lay off all the regular workers at the same time without notice. Either that, or they will find excuses to fire them one at a time, gradually replacing them.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    7. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Most companies that hires H1B workers usually lay off American workers at the front door while bringing in H1B workers through the back door.

    8. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So anyone working there with any common sense at all should be interviewing NOW!.

      If you aren't interviewing then you should be updating your certifications and such.

      This isn't some kind of "oops we made a mistake" error. Upper management wants to replace you with cheaper options. Get out on your terms instead of their terms.

    9. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by dj245 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Trust, it takes a long time to build and just a few seconds to destroy

      Well, that's giving Disney too much credit I think. This was a long time in the works with several different departments and at least a dozen people involved. You have to have meetings with the outside contractor, draft a contract, get approvals, arrange payment methods, etc etc. You need to have meetings with HR, and they have to get all the preparations in place to fire the American workers. Somebody has to coordinate employee orientations and reassign assets from all the terminated employees to the replacement workers.

      This was a carefully planned operation with many people involved. It was deliberately done, step by step, over the course of months or even years. The only mistake is that people found out about it.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    10. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in the end, the American workers end up taking up the back door.

    11. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by captnjohnny1618 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully if (when) Disney (and other major corporations) attempts to do this, the affected employees make a ton of noise about it and the news outlets still pick it up. It'll take "canaries" inside of the system though to draw attention to it.

    12. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by tburkhol · · Score: 2

      Disney management will simply wait for the uproar to die down and then start setting vague and aggressive performance objectives for the U.S. workers. They'll then get rid of people via performance review.

      They probably don't even need to worry about getting rid of their existing workforce. If your boss spends a lot of time loudly whining about how he can't afford to keep all these IT people; about how he wishes he could replace them all with H1B's, but then tells you not to worry about your job, you'd be an idiot not to fire up the resume printer. Before long, the only people left will be the ones who can't get work elsewhere.

    13. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Like trees. Smokey the HR bear. "Only you can prevent fire fires".

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    14. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      So anyone working there with any common sense at all should have been interviewing weeks ago.

      FTFY.

    15. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That almost happened to me last year when I was looking for a job. I was scheduled for an interview with the India-based Infosys (one of the companies that provided workers to Disney). If I haven't got hired elsewhere, I would be a "diversity hire" to prove that they weren't 100% Indian workers in the U.S.

    16. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 4, Informative

      "The only mistake is that people found out about it."

      THAT is the "seconds to destroy" part, that the parent referred to.

    17. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not just interviewing, unionizing. If I was told me and my coworkers were being fired in 90 days and were to train our replacements, I'd gather up my coworkers and tell them we want a year's salary as a bonus now or we all walk that afternoon. Especially if they later try to pull this shit- I'd be demanding huge raises/bonuses to stick around for any time at all.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    18. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by idontgno · · Score: 2

      It'll take "canaries" inside of the system though to draw attention to it.

      Next up: NDAs integrated into contracts that prevent disclosure of this kind of termination/outsourcing, on penalty of immediate termination for cause and no severance.

      The next time Disney does this, it'll take more than a canary: it'll take a whistle-blower willing to eat the personal consequences. Because in Disney management's mind, they "would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for those meddling kids!"*

      *yeah, I know, that's Hanna-Barbera, not Disney.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    19. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

      Consider it as if nothing had happened...until the fuss dies down, and they're all quietly shown the door.

    20. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is complete crap. Disney is loaded with foreign workers outside of IT, their parks are run be overseas staff. They get a year or two in the US and then booted out of the country. How about losing the "IT" angle and looking at it as a people thing? Just because you're a dweeb that uses a keyboard, you're no different from anyone else. In fact, those that are public facing are more important than a fat sweaty socially inadequate slob doing jquery, sql and php, a trivial programming set that can be done anywhere on the planet.

    21. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      But unions are evil and communistic. How dare you!

      /sarcasm

    22. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Disney / ABC is pretty smart. The 35 people are sure to keep looking around the job market (which is much better in NY and CA than in FL from the last round of ~250 layoffs) and eventually leave anyway. If they leave voluntarily, Disney doesn't have to pay them the severance package at all, which is likely equivalent to an extra few months' salary. A small price to pay for the goodwill from this "Hey, maybe Disney does have a heart" headlines.

    23. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      There's nothing crap in my post. One would be an idiot to think that Disney won't try again to layoff these workers in the future. Your entire rant seems predicated on something I never explicitly stated or even implied.

    24. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by paiute · · Score: 1

      not measuring up in Disney's new high performance culture.

      Fred, these chapatis of yours are just not quite right. I'm afraid we are going to have to let you go.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    25. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      A small price to pay for the goodwill from this "Hey, maybe Disney is less of a dick" headlines.

      FTFY

    26. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by alexgieg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Intel did something as much evil and it went through undisturbed. Everyone there was invited to move to Portland if they wished to keep their jobs. Those who didn't accept moving were considered as having resigned, so without any right to severance packages. After all, Intel didn't fire anyone, right? It's the employee who "unreasonably" didn't "want" to move to the other side of the country. And the sociopaths who thought of this plan undoubtedly earned huge bonuses thanks to the "economy" they caused the company.

      Americans, it seems, love their corporate overlords. That's the only explanation I can think of for something so absurd to be allowed to happen.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    27. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is almost guaranteed that such an NDA would violate state and federal law, not just whistleblower laws but basic employment regulations. And no sane company wants to find more reasons to "terminate for cause", considering the HR time and legal fees it takes to justify such a termination - any intelligent IT worker would sue if they were fired for cause in such a case.

    28. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by electrosoccertux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      honestly, if you're going to bribe congress to let you pillage the country's copyright system getting it extended every 25 years so that your financial conglomerate can continue leaching off the IP of one creative man who died 50 years ago, the least you can do is keep some Americans employed.

      fuckers.

    29. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been there went from #1 one year on the Dept to the bottom 2nd to last. And all my stats but one were still at the top and that was down due to ticket grabbing/stealing/hijacking after all the work was done and only the client had to be reached.

      Never trust the suits. you can tell when their lying because their lips are moving.

    30. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's possible that these cheaper options were idiots, depending on how far down Disney pushed the salaries when transitioning to H1B workers.

    31. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just like attention was drawn to the destruction of so much blue-collar work? Most Americans don't seem to care that the wealthy are looting the country until they lose their own jobs. Too many working-class people have an absurd belief that they'll be one of the wealthy exploiters, so support the destruction of the American dream of hard work bringing you a good life. It's insane.

    32. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My father was fired from a job (decades ago) and received a severance package. He was made to sign a contract that said that merely talking to a lawyer about why he was fired would be cause for the company to revoke his severance. Could a decent lawyer have ripped this to shreds? Probably. However, my father needed the money and couldn't risk losing his severance - much less spending time/money on a lawsuit instead of finding a new job.

      What "is legal to do" and "what is done" are often two different things and companies will often bank on people not having the resources of a big company to fight back legally.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    33. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the late 90's there was talk about unionizing IT, but in Silicon Valley at the time, people who could barely boot up Windows 95 were getting 90K a year to start. No one thought we'd ever need unions.

      For a bunch of allegedly smart people, we were shortsighted and dumb.

      Being on call 24/7 for years, including ALL holiday's, because companies don't want to hire shift workers, working 70 hours a week on salary, and then moving into management and being told to outsource my entire admin/engineer staff.... hindsight is a bitch.

      Unionize now.

    34. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      That's if you are lucky enough to find a lawyer willing to take your case too... I got fired for bullshit with no severance. Lawyer was willing to write a letter, but not pursue it to court when the company declined to respond to the letter.

      Also, these are probably mostly white men. Since when do white men win wrongful termination litigation?

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    35. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just interviewing, unionizing. If I was told me and my coworkers were being fired in 90 days and were to train our replacements, I'd gather up my coworkers and tell them we want a year's salary as a bonus now or we all walk that afternoon.

      Except that this action took place in Florida, which is a Right-to-Work state, which severely limits the effectiveness of unionization.

    36. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      The only mistake is that people found out about it.

      Kindof hard not to when the details are made very public.
      It's not like keeping the script of a movie under wraps. When you fire workers and make them retrain their H1B replacements, there's no way to keep that secret.

    37. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by tomhath · · Score: 1

      I'd gather up my coworkers and tell them we want a year's salary as a bonus now or we all walk that afternoon

      Yea, that would really scare the crap out of the company that wanted to lay you off.

    38. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Americans, it seems, love their corporate overlords. That's the only explanation I can think of for something so absurd to be allowed to happen.

      Poppycock. Oligarchy. Unless the elite are on board, good luck.

    39. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      The employment terms will have Mickey embedded in them so they'll be protected by trademark and copyright!

    40. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If he received a severance package then he wasn't fired for cause, since he agreed to accept the package. He also, unfortunately, agreed to the "not talk to a lawyer" clause, which, if he had really felt strongly about it, he could have struck from the agreement. In most cases a severance agreement is written in a way that reflects the voice of the employee who is leaving the job, that they are negotiating the terms of the severance. If the choice to strike an undesirable clause from a severance agreement is turned in a "termination with cause" then a company will have an even BIGGER legal mess on their hands, as they are not negotiating in good faith. But on the other hand, depending on the particular state, a company is not required to offer any extraordinary severance compensation, so if the employee can only get the package with strings attached, they would be wise to negotiate for more money or benefits to make up for the attached strings. And above all else, if you are given your "last paycheck plus vacation hours" and then asked to sign a letter, take the check and the letter without signing anything. You may later discover some shenanigans and can then contact your favorite solicitor.

    41. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Except that this action took place in Florida, which is a Right-to-Work state, which severely limits the effectiveness of unionization.

      Not when the "union" is being formed because all the prospective members are being fired and told to train their replacements. Just because you can't force coworkers to unionize in the good years doesn't mean they don't recognize the value in the bad years.

    42. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, I don't want two bosses. One boss is enough. I want to work on my terms, not someone else's and I don't want extra paperwork or micromanaging of my lunch breaks to comply with union crap. Unions are for people who can't negotiate for themselves.

      If you're the least bit good, you can do better. I work from home for a nice salary. I'm flexible about my time and my employer is flexible about theirs. Work gets done, everyone's happy, and there's no crap to deal with.

    43. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is interesting to note that some of Disney's most well-known films are based on public domain works, while Disney has been one of the biggest factors in eliminating the public domain altogether.

    44. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by rnturn · · Score: 1

      Well, seeing as how the soon-to-be-former Disney IT folks were being forced to train their replacements, Disney had to know they were in a bad situation. Imagine the fix Disney would have been in had everyone told them to stuff their 2-3 month's salary bribes^Wseverance and boxed up their personal items after that initial meeting and there'd had been no knowledge transfer? One can only hope that someday, somewhere an IT team will band together and tell their employers to keep their paltry severance and walk out the door. (And, hopefully, straight to the press.)

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    45. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. It seems quite interesting!

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    46. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that unions are particularly weak now, and getting weaker. Sure if they make very minor demands they might do okay, but annoy the company too much and they will just move to another state or outsource the work to one or more other countries. Heck, even if they don't annoy the company much, they will of course still do everything they can to cut costs. If it saves money on paper to relocate, or just start new projects elsewhere, they will do it, even if the math is fundamentally flawed and doesn't account for the actual costs to the company. Someone would likely even get a bonus/raise for it. Another thing I've seen of late is the tendency to target higher grade workers for layoffs when doing such things and then pretty much make promotions far more difficult to get, and if you do get them, well no where else in the company is likely to be able to hire a worker past the new top grade...

    47. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Nanotech7 · · Score: 1

      Right!!!!! Thank you!!! If only more folks could JUST GROW A NEURON!!!!!!

    48. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Nanotech7 · · Score: 0

      In the past 8 years, the Union, in conjunction with the President (by which the Union funded his campaign ) has completely destroyed every Merit shop or company out there and gave special privileges to Non-American folks to start up their own companies, that are paying their Club Union Due's, and gaining their citizenship. I am sick of this!! Not surprised the Union would hit Disney. The Union is backed by the Gov., very powerful, and very rich - they make the Sheikhs look like peasants. If we are lucky - the Union will fall into its own darkness.

    49. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Nanotech7 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Better hope that IT does NOT become Union. Look at the educational system. Crapy teachers because those of us who do care about our students and do ensure our students learn, cant make enough money to be an educator and survive. Thank you Union. But, those who have been there for 15 or more years and paid their Club Union Membership fees are protected, cant be touched, hate the students, hate what they do, and will make your life miserable if things don't go their way - and they still cant break 50K.

    50. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      It is interesting to note that some of Disney's most well-known films are based on public domain works, while Disney has been one of the biggest factors in eliminating the public domain altogether.

      can you open that up for us? I wasn't aware of this, and would appreciate a short schooling session

    51. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Workers are under assault because we spend too much of our income. Say no to *ha* Disney movies, expensive houses, expensive cars, cell phone plans, tablets, and gadgets out the ear. Pay off your house. Pay off your cars. Have lots of money in a credit union (better rates than banks). Yeah, yeah, the banks/credit unions are evil too. But guess what? You sleep good at night. Then you can change jobs on a whim. Feed to THEM, what they try to make us eat.

    52. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      It is interesting to note that some of Disney's most well-known films are based on public domain works, while Disney has been one of the biggest factors in eliminating the public domain altogether.

      can you open that up for us? I wasn't aware of this, and would appreciate a short schooling session

      Mr AC is referring to many of the Disney stories being old European stories that were in the public domain. They used those stories in many of their works - I don't know which ones.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    53. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by stongef · · Score: 2
    54. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Union is backed by the Gov., very powerful, and very rich - they make the Sheikhs look like peasants. If we are lucky - the Union will fall into its own darkness.

      You may not realize it but you are an idiot. You probably don't realize it.

    55. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My father was fired from a job (decades ago) and received a severance package. He was made to sign a contract that said that merely talking to a lawyer about why he was fired would be cause for the company to revoke his severance. Could a decent lawyer have ripped this to shreds? Probably. However, my father needed the money and couldn't risk losing his severance - much less spending time/money on a lawsuit instead of finding a new job.

      What "is legal to do" and "what is done" are often two different things and companies will often bank on people not having the resources of a big company to fight back legally.

      For the benefit of the terminally ignorant, a severance package is a courtesy in the United States; there is no law here that requires an employer to offer a severance package.

      (The WARN Act and the like are not severance packages. They are advance notice requirements.)

    56. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Disney will just do it more gradually after the uproar dies down.

      This is PR damage control, nothing more.

      Give it six months, and they'll probably still be out of a job.

      Agreed. I won't believe otherwise until I see it reported that the person or persons responsible for this bone headed move has been fired.

    57. Re: Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? Name a kids TV series that hasn't had an episode with a variation on Cinderella, 3 Little Pigs, Hansel & Gretal.

      Jungle Tales came out just after Kippling's copyright expired.

    58. Re: Don't worry, they'll try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See last summer's non-union strike at Market Basket in Massachusetts.

    59. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by sh00z · · Score: 1

      It is interesting to note that some of Disney's most well-known films are based on public domain works, while Disney has been one of the biggest factors in eliminating the public domain altogether.

      can you open that up for us? I wasn't aware of this, and would appreciate a short schooling session

      Open it up? You weren't aware that Disney didn't have to pay anyone for the rights to Cinderella, Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, Alice in Wonderland, Hercules, Hamlet (The Lion King), Mulan, Pocahontas, Pinocchio, ad infinitum? .

      I always use my favorite example of how they abuse copyright--Disney has now held the copyright on *their* version of Alice in Wonderland for more than twice as long as Lewis Carrol did for the original work.

    60. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Oh, and of course there's always that *one* part of Fantasia that they did have to pay for--Stravinski's "The Rite of Spring." They've managed to convince an appeals court that the original contract (explicitly covering theatrical release only) also licenses all home video distribution, so its copyright has been rendered essentially null for them and them alone. I can think of at least 10 other movies that have never had a DVD or soundtrack CD release because the prevailing legal opinion is that those rights must be negotiated separately.

    61. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by laurencetux · · Score: 1

      well lets see
      Snow white
      Cinderella
      Little Mermaid
      FROZEN

      and a large number of other disney movies are direct copies of PD works.

      and if Disney was not in the practice of slamming folks into a crater for even coming close to any Disney IP this would be fine.

      heck if you opened a store and sold waffles shaped like three circles the local Police would shut you down just to cover themselves.

    62. Re: Don't worry, they'll try again by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      I don't regularly watch kids tv. I see you do, and are hiding you coward

    63. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      I am well aware they don't, but that's because I thought they owned them.

    64. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      oh, didn't know this. thought they owned all that

    65. Re:Don't worry, they'll try again by weweedmaniii · · Score: 1

      IIRC that is one reason why "WKRP in Cincinnati" hasn't been released on DVD, during the run of the show they used short clips from current hits in the studio with all the blackmail (um copyright) money paid for the airing on TV, now they would have to go back and renegotiate all over again for the rights to play them on DVD, or over dub all those with music they could get the rights too.

      --
      "If stupid things work...then they are not stupid."
  2. McLoving Mickey by sdinfoserv · · Score: 2

    I'm sure this does not effect moral at all......

    1. Re:McLoving Mickey by buk110 · · Score: 2

      The beatings will continue until morale improves. All hail the mouse

    2. Re:McLoving Mickey by swamp+boy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not only that, think of what kind of effect it has on morale......

    3. Re:McLoving Mickey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A company I used to work for in Orlando needed animators.
      We got 300 applications from people at Disney. They referred to it as Mauschwitz.

    4. Re:McLoving Mickey by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      You better believe it!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:McLoving Mickey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      EVERYBODY who's worked at Disney invariably refers to it as Mauschwitz (or Mouseswitz). The only other internal company name I've come across that's more universal is ex G.E. employees referring to it as "Generous Electric".

    6. Re:McLoving Mickey by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      "The happiest place on earth."

      Yeah, not so much.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    7. Re:McLoving Mickey by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      It likely is if you're a C-level.

    8. Re:McLoving Mickey by dj245 · · Score: 3, Funny

      EVERYBODY who's worked at Disney invariably refers to it as Mauschwitz (or Mouseswitz). The only other internal company name I've come across that's more universal is ex G.E. employees referring to it as "Generous Electric".

      In my industry (steam and gas turbines), GE stands for "Good Enough".

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    9. Re:McLoving Mickey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I worked for Disney IT (Team Disney building in Disney World) about 6 years ago. It was, by far and without a doubt, the worst job I ever had. I don't know how typical my position was, but my manager had no qualms about grinding his people into the ground.

      I feel for the people being jerked around, but I can't imagine why they would actually want to work for the Rat in the first place.

    10. Re:McLoving Mickey by kbrannen · · Score: 3, Informative

      The only other internal company name I've come across that's more universal is ex G.E. employees referring to it as "Generous Electric".

      When I worked at TI (Texas Instruments) in the 90's, it was pretty universally referred to as "Training Institute" because so many people would work there for a few years after college before going somewhere else. Some people also called it "Tiny Income". There's some truth to both. :)

    11. Re:McLoving Mickey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I worked for Lockheed Martin we called it LockMart.

    12. Re:McLoving Mickey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      SAP is referred to as "Send Another Payment"
      AT&T is referred to as the Death Star.

      Feel free to keep it going...

    13. Re:McLoving Mickey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allegedly there was a memo sent out requiring employees to stop using Mauschwitz... so they switched to saying Duckau.

  3. Update the resume by buk110 · · Score: 5, Informative

    And start looking anyway. This is a temp stop gap to keep people from rioting, they'll hope the masses forget about it and can try this again in 6 months. Don't give them the chance, get out of dodge while you can

    1. Re:Update the resume by 8282now · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Which ironically will give them the exact justification to bring in the contractors -

      What does quitting do other than fulfilling what management wanted all along??

    2. Re:Update the resume by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      They should have already been looking for a job when the layoff was first announced. Unless they have no other job prospects, none of those IT people should be wanting to stay with Disney after this.

    3. Re:Update the resume by buk110 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because in a few months they're going to pull the same stunt and if the flood gates open you might as well find a job before the flood of applications hit all at once

    4. Re:Update the resume by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which ironically will give them the exact justification to bring in the contractors -

      Which is no reason to stick around working for a company that clearly wants to fire you.

      What does quitting do other than fulfilling what management wanted all along??

      It gives you a chance to get a job at a company that might actually value you? It's not like staying around is somehow sticking it to Disney or any of the boneheads pushing the H1-B plans. So why stick around at a place that doesn't even pretend to have loyalty to you?

    5. Re:Update the resume by HarrySquatter · · Score: 4, Informative

      Quitting allows you to leave on your own terms rather than being humiliated into training your low-pay replacements and then being fired. Are you really saying that workers should stick around at a company that was just days before trying to lay them off?

    6. Re:Update the resume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love if they all walked out at the same time. A sudden loss of all tech workers would cause havoc.

    7. Re:Update the resume by sconeu · · Score: 3

      Except that management will have nobody to train the newbies. Hilarity ensues!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    8. Re:Update the resume by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      That would be good. Unfortunately not ever is financially secure enough to just up and quit their job at a moment's notice. Disney knows this and will use this fear as a way to screw these people over at some point in the future.

    9. Re:Update the resume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because in a few months they're going to pull the same stunt and if the flood gates open you might as well find a job before the flood of applications hit all at once

      ^THIS

      And with the inherent prejudice against unemployed people, one should bolt before the layoffs begin. And as one retired manager once told me, "It's not right, but when you two qualified candidates, they'll always go for the younger one. That's just the way it is."

    10. Re:Update the resume by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Worse than that, if everybody sends a big "fuck you" and leaves all at once, they don't have people to keep doing the job.

      And then they'll pretend like their employees owe them something and act like victims.

      These people have already lost their jobs. The only difference is how much longer they collect the checks, and how much Disney forces them to shut up next time.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:Update the resume by buk110 · · Score: 1

      That too. Might as well go dumping a can of petrol across the bridge on the way out

    12. Re:Update the resume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It gives you a chance to get a job at a company that might actually value you?

      There is no such company. We are all "resources" to be used up and cast away. They will use you for 60+ hours a week "to get the project done!" - total horseshit. It's done because they're getting 50%+ of free overtime out of your stupid ass. They get younger people who haven't been around long enough to notice that pay hasn't gone anywhere in over 15 years.

      In public, companies bitch and moan how they can't get "qualified" people, but behind closed doors, all of you are considered easily replaced commodities.

    13. Re:Update the resume by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of an incident at a company I worked at where the new vice president read out an email from HR that EVERYONE was getting stock options. Great news, everyone was happy. Except the HR person did a face palm. After the VP read the last line that "this applies only to managers", he was surprised to find everyone pissed off. The company gave everyone 180 options that vested over five years. It didn't help that the stock price went for $20 to $0.02 per share after the dot com bust.

    14. Re:Update the resume by Travco · · Score: 1

      "It gives you a chance to get a job at a company" - who will do the same thing to you as soon as they figure out how.

    15. Re:Update the resume by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Likely, but at least they will pretend to want to keep you around. Disney has clearly stated in public that they don't want these people around.

    16. Re:Update the resume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse than that, if everybody sends a big "fuck you" and leaves all at once, they don't have people to keep doing the job.

      Been there, done that, never regretted it. The company tanked. Maybe Disney will do the same.

    17. Re:Update the resume by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Depends on the cost/benefits ratio. Do the math. You might at least be able to sue for a nice severance check.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    18. Re:Update the resume by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      The company tanked. Maybe Disney will do the same.

      Disney is not SCO

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    19. Re:Update the resume by houghi · · Score: 1

      In Europe we have organisations where the workers unite and they are able to strike the companies with their demands. But that would be socialism and that is bad, right?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    20. Re:Update the resume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which ironically will give them the exact justification to bring in the contractors -

      What does quitting do other than fulfilling what management wanted all along??

      Which is why we need some sort of blacklist for this type of thing. Can't find workers for the job? Fine, hire H1-B workers to do it. But once you've demonstrated that you are abusing the H1-B system, you are ineligible to use it. You just have to raise your wages until you CAN find qualified workers or shut down. Unfortunately, that's not foolproof. They'll just "contract out" the work to an "independent" firm which has not yet been blacklisted from the H1-B program. So you'd need to ban them from hiring another company to hire the H1-B's to do the work. That gets a lot trickier to enforce.

    21. Re:Update the resume by fatboy · · Score: 1

      Which ironically will give them the exact justification to bring in the contractors -

      What does quitting do other than fulfilling what management wanted all along??

      Because you get to do it on your terms, not theirs.

      --
      --fatboy
    22. Re:Update the resume by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Might, but you'll probably lose a substantial amount to your legal costs.

    23. Re:Update the resume by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Quitting allows you to leave on your own terms rather than being humiliated into training your low-pay replacements and then being fired. Are you really saying that workers should stick around at a company that was just days before trying to lay them off?

      I don't think you understand something at play here. In my career of 28 years in IT, I have noticed that some people will just not leave - ever - under any circumstances until you turn out the lights and close the doors. What I mean is, no matter how bad the job is, some people will not ever leave it until they get thrown out the door or the company goes out of business. Not always, but usually it's the people who are just barely getting by. Some years ago we hired a guy who used to work for a local bank and his local bank got bought out by a much bigger bank out of state. They planned to shut down all their IT work in our city for this bank they bought, but they needed this guy and his co-workers to stay to help out with the transition. At first they were told 6 months and they'd be done. 6 months came and they got offered another 6 month extension. Then came another 6 month extension. The guy looked for another job and we hired him, but he left a co-worker behind who just didn't want to leave. Eventually after maybe 3 years, they finally closed down the IT work in our city and co-worker guy now for real has to find a job. The guy we hired asked us to hire his co-worker and we couldn't. No more openings. Even though this guy knew his job was going to end sooner rather than later, and the bank did not want to keep him on after it closed down all the local IT work they had, he refused to leave or even start looking for a job until they told him "Your job is over. Thanks. We'll send your final paycheck to you. Today is your last day." My previous employer, a European company, did some really reprehensible things to us before I left. They changed our terms of employment to favor them and enable them to cheat us out of severance pay they promised us and told us we had to either accept the new terms that let them do it or quit. Then they gave my small department 6 months notice that they were moving our jobs to another lower cost country (not India though). I was the only person in my office to find another job before the deadline. Nobody else would leave. One of the things you see at Disney is a lot of employees are big Disney fans, so they want to work there and they will put up with a lot of bs to do so. Even with these workers temporarily getting their jobs back, and yes we here all know this likely won't have a happy ending for them, more like a temporary reprieve, I guarantee you that many will still happily go back and refuse to look elsewhere for a job until they get this job taken away from them.

    24. Re:Update the resume by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Which ironically will give them the exact justification to bring in the contractors -

      What does quitting do other than fulfilling what management wanted all along??

      Because you get to do it on your terms, not theirs.

      Your terms, coincidentally, involves saving Disney a chunk of money. Money that will of course find its way to the execs who thought the idea up in the first place. And your new employer will probably sooner or later be thinking along the same lines. It's lose-lose, no matter what you do.

      The best thing to do is to unionise *and* stay. They try to pull this shit again and executive heads will roll.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    25. Re:Update the resume by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      "Accordingly, all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed." And sometimes you hope that if you can just ship that next release, everything will work out . . . .

    26. Re:Update the resume by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

      No, unions have nothing to do with being socialist or capitalist or communist. Nice trolling, though.

      Unions can be good - and originally they were, here in the USA. They made sure workers had decent working conditions and weren't slaving away for pennies a day. In exchange, the union would ensure that the workers were qualified and doing their jobs and provided a pathway for technical training.

      Unfortunately, they started to go too far, as these things often do. Today, too many of the USA's unions are money grabbing thug organizations that would rather burn a business to the ground than give up anything at all. Many unions are only interested in excessive compensation, keeping out competition / protectionism, and political activism.

      Some unions are happy to let a business die rather than capitulate on ridiculous requests. The Hostess company is one example. The American automotive industry collapsed, in part, due to the unions. Did you know that in America, when vinyl records were used to play music on the radio, that the radio union created a position with the sole responsibility of putting the record on the turnstile? Nobody else was allowed to do that simple task of putting the record on and dropping the needle. If a sound engineer were to do it they would get in big trouble.

      It's nearly impossible in some industries to fire someone because of the insane power the unions can wield - and the unions will always defend you, even if you're incompetent, have committed a serious crime, or whatever. After all, they want to ensure that there's a tradition of defending everybody no matter what, so that should the people at the top get in trouble for something legitimate...

      That kind of behavior is why you see a growing anti-union sentiment in the USA. I don't know what it is like over in Europe - it may be that the unions over there are a lot more sensible.

      It's very unfortunate. Unions, done properly, are an excellent thing, but greed is powerful and people are stupid. Here in the USA the unions have failed.

      These days, because of the protection the Federal and State laws provide, official union organizations in general seem unnecessary. All the protections that unions fought hard for have become federal law. But, that doesn't mean a group of workers, who aren't in a legal "Union", can't just walk out anyway. If they're being abused, they should walk out and make their complaints known.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    27. Re:Update the resume by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      These people have already lost their jobs. The only difference is how much longer they collect the checks, and how much Disney forces them to shut up next time.

      It wouldn't be the first time I've seen somebody quit and then get rehired on as a contractor at a much higher rate to do their old job because the company really needed that person.

    28. Re:Update the resume by slew · · Score: 3, Informative

      But, that doesn't mean a group of workers, who aren't in a legal "Union", can't just walk out anyway. If they're being abused, they should walk out and make their complaints known.

      Although a non-union group of worker can "just-walk-out", the company can just replace them in most states. This generally isn't true with a company with a union contract (which covers allowed strikes and work stoppages/slowdowns). Also in the united states at least, there is a distinction between an economic demands strike and an unfair labor practices strike (basically company attempts to subvert collective bargaining, e.g., selective firing, refusal to bargain with a certified union). Any job protections in the case of an economic strike are basically non-existent, unless covered by a union contract.

      So if your goal is attempt to walk-out as a group to protest being replaced by cheaper labor, unless you are unionized, you have pretty much just resigned as a group. A better strategy if not unionized is to raise a stink so that the company backs off (hey, sounds familiar)...

    29. Re:Update the resume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I find hilarious/sad is how many employees who are being laid off accept a mere two-week severance in exchange of giving all their legal rights.

      I understand a lot of employees are living paycheck-to-paycheck, but two weeks pay ain't gonna make any difference. I think it's much better to tell the employer "thanks, but I would like to explore my legal options...there are my rights, and I am not giving them up!"

    30. Re:Update the resume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SHHHH! Don't let them in on the big secret. The Americans made sure we were all capitalists in order to prevent that sort of thing. ;-)

    31. Re:Update the resume by KGIII · · Score: 1

      This is not true. This is true for large companies, maybe. I owned a company, we eventually had offices in Florida, North Carolina, and California and two sub-offices (not full scale, was not needed - employees would go there for contracts) in Indiana and New Mexico. The unofficial company slogan was to treat everyone how you wanted to be treated. We did not abuse, overworks, or treat anyone unkind. Promotions to management staff was done from within, exclusively, to ensure the dynamics remained the same and were the same across the board. In the entire history of the company, while I owned it, we fired three people, laid off nobody, had less than a dozen move off to new employment, had a handful that went on to become mothers and did not return after their child was born, and had two people retire. As I said, this may be true for large companies. We had slightly fewer than 200 people when I sold the business. The company continues to run as its own separate entity within a much larger corporation. I understand it is much the same though there is less flexibility than there used to be.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    32. Re:Update the resume by Altus · · Score: 2

      What rights exactly. At least in a "right to work" state you don't have a lot of recourse unless you are being discriminated against. If an entire department is being laid off it would be hard to show that you were laid off for anything but legitimate reasons. Under what circumstances is a worker really going to end up better off turning down the money (plus the ability to collect unemployment right away, at least here in Mass).

      I coukd see delaying signing to consult a lawyer maybe but I suspect in most cases they will tell you to take the money and run. its better than nothing.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    33. Re:Update the resume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same thing happen but the company I worked for, a major fortune 100 company, insourced from Accenture.

      Management had plans to let people go they had permatemp'd the position for 10 years, and their jobs were literally "take direction from users, managers, and c-levels that work for your company, do X, make sure they don't complain to your manager". There were literally people at certain sites that could get you fired 1 e-mail. Where's the accountability? Nowhere. And they had people who were there for literally 1 year they wanted to keep.

      So of course, things started to get really confusing really fast as to who was and wasn't getting let go, and being kept, rumors mixed in with managerspeak meetings mixed in with incredibly, incredibly stupid and mis-information by managers. Emails and Org Charts and Memo's and Payroll files got leaked. It got to the point nobody knew. So they started losing all their top performers in their departments.

      So one day some of the firewall staff left. A 2-day Internet outage for nearly 50k employee's ensued. This does not include the fact everyone started moving data onto external hard drives because the IT department started LITERALLY publishing policies about 2GB mailbox limits and no backing up off site, slightly larger network drives, as accidentally deleting file shares to a few bucks of space thinking there were backups and hey, we got rid of the people who handled backups. The company has since moved everything onto citrix, that was their big way to save money and reduce their datacenter size and footprint. Department budgets are going through the roof because of the information losses.

      The real kicker of it was at the end, 8 people in my group got let go and did not get paid their last paychecks or remaining vacation pay. I did management a huge favor working the last week there putting in 16+ hour consecutive shifts to cover positions nobody else was doing.

      Suffice to say, I've moved on and up. I've had calls from other departments at that company, I tell them the above story and say no thank you very much.

      I have headhunters calling me all the time about permatemp project work. My response is always "When you have a real job, Call me". Those jobs are scams, I refuse to work them. I'll starve and die first before I work them. I'll take the job, get into the server room, barricade the door and start ripping up servers and mainboards and throwing disks as hard as I can at the wall before I work them.

      If it's temp work or a day job or a project, fine, that's 100% acceptable. Tell me the story of how it's project work. Otherwise, is that a job offer? I'm looking for a real job.

  4. Oh, okay! by Bovius · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll totally just go back to my job now, with no loss in enthusiasm or loyalty. It's like nothing happened! Everything is okay. I will continue working for Disney and we'll be best friends forever.

  5. Summary's wrong by the_skywise · · Score: 5, Informative

    Disney completed the layoffs of the Florida IT division (Walt Disney World)
    This was ANOTHER set of layoffs for ABC Broadcasting comprising about 35 workers that were going to undergo the same process. ABC's has been halted but, AFAIK, the Florida IT division is still SOL.

    1. Re:Summary's wrong by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      well at least now they can get out of Florida. Silver linings man, silver linings.

    2. Re:Summary's wrong by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      They can go work for EA :)

    3. Re:Summary's wrong by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      out of the frying pan..

    4. Re:Summary's wrong by WarlockD · · Score: 2

      They can go work for EA :)

      out of the frying pan..

      ...into the Battlefield 5?

    5. Re:Summary's wrong by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      They can go work for EA :)

      out of the frying pan..

      ...into the Battlefield 5?

      Personally I've never left 3 and enjoy it very much, and I do have 4.

      MW2 (Call of Duty) programmer's of and for EA.COM were laid off just before it's release, leaving in IW.net from which it was originally meat to of be played from. How after being hacked, I put my spare time into AlterIW.net banning MW2 cheaters (my part in their efforts), of which many many servers were connected to.

      AlterIW.net is now down and has been for years, but the doings of an amazing programmer named NTAuthority.

    6. Re:Summary's wrong by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      They can go work for EA :)

      out of the frying pan..

      ...into the Battlefield 5?

      meat to of be played from.

      Does that really say meat and be? It was suppose to of said: meant to of been played from

    7. Re:Summary's wrong by Agronomist+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      They can go work for EA :)

      out of the frying pan..

      ...into the Battlefield 5?

      meat to of be played from.

      Does that really say meat and be? It was suppose to of said: meant to of been played from

      Should say: meant to have been played from.

      --
      -DwS
    8. Re:Summary's wrong by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      meat to of be played from.

      Does that really say meat and be? It was suppose to of said: meant to of been played from

      Should say: meant to have been played from.

      Actually thank you, but it's one of those errors I keep and will keep making by mistake, like the word tomorrow (I know easy) and a few others I'll misspell thinking it correct (spell checkers nice), or a post I'll read a hundred times (or much, much less) to insure it's what I want to post, send it off and one word throws the entire thought backwards from what I meant -good or bad one can't edit it even if it's glaring at them by that time :)

      I can't think of one post I haven't made an error in, discovered after the fact, be it a word, as you mentioned syntax, or a comma/period out of place - just being examples.

      And I really do feel bad one ) to those whom(?) I'm trying to reach, or myself) as it looks bad. But I do try.

  6. It's a small small world... by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    ...that H-1B workers need to stay the hell out of.

    1. Re:It's a small small world... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      It's a small world after all
      It's a small world after all
      Oppose us and we will crush you
      It's a small small small small world

    2. Re:It's a small small world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's too small a world with those H-1B-TB (tuberculosis)

  7. Some guy posted his thoughts on Google+? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    What, was his MySpace account unavailable or something?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Some guy posted his thoughts on Google+? by ADRA · · Score: 2

      Sorry, some people want to have real discussions about things that matter instead of being bombarded with mail chains from Mom and Aunt Betsy.

      --
      Bye!
    2. Re:Some guy posted his thoughts on Google+? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aren't all discussions on Google+ monologues?

    3. Re:Some guy posted his thoughts on Google+? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even articles on a ghost town like Soylent News gets more commentators than most Google+ posts.

    4. Re:Some guy posted his thoughts on Google+? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one forces you to add your Mom or Aunt Betsy. Seems like you have your own issues to work out.

    5. Re:Some guy posted his thoughts on Google+? by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 1

      No one forces you to add your Mom or Aunt Betsy.

      Facebook forces you to use your real name. After that, it's Mom herself who forces you (however passive-aggressively) to add her. Once Mom's foot is in the door, Aunt Betsy is never far behind. The only real alternative is to say, "eff you, Mom". Which is, let's face it, pretty hardcore.

    6. Re:Some guy posted his thoughts on Google+? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or do what us really hard core bastards do. Don't have a Facebook page at all. Or Google+, Twitter, personal webpage, blog, youtube channel, etc.

      All I have is a standard email and a phone number. Mom can access either one at any time, but it doesn't mean I have to accept the message at an inconvenient time..

    7. Re:Some guy posted his thoughts on Google+? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Facebook forces you to use your real name.

      They do? I know people with numerous secondary accounts that don't use a real name of anyone. And those accounts have been around for years and years.

  8. I'd like to see a permanet disney 'evil counter' by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    like a doomesday counter or a count that shows the number of accident free days at work.

    but this would be a constant reminder and a bloody nose to disney, how evil this h1b policy is and how evil DISNEY is.

    'its been X days since disney last laid off US workers'. and when they do more evil shit, that counter gets reset (or, rather, its timestamp does).

    too many ignorant americans have NO IDEA how fucked up disney is. they believe the hype and drink the koolaid and continue to buy their crotchfruit more and more disney merch.

    people need to realize how evil this company is and that they are NOT worth giving your money to under any circumstances at all.

    a public counter that stays up (yeah, disney has lots of lawyers so not sure how you can keep it running under pressure of lawsuit, even though it would be fair to have this be told about them) would really keep this issue alive, long after disney has buried it in the news.

    disney should be the poster child of what is wrong with h1b. no one but us techies realize the h1b problem. the world needs to see this (at least the US does). disney might be the proper wake-up call to finally make people realize how badly we have sold our own people out ;(

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  9. Happiest place on earth! by kencurry · · Score: 1

    not

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
  10. See, I told you we're all family here at Disney! by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 2

    Manson family but family, still.

  11. And if they really want to make nice by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The board should direct the termination of the executive responsible in such a way that it is termination for failing to abide by Disney, Florida and federal labor guidelines so that they don't get a severance. Since most of the employees are still there, there's no wrongful termination lawsuit they can bring against Disney so the risk to Disney by admitting that they caught an executive violating the rules and acted accordingly should be small.

    1. Re:And if they really want to make nice by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      This is probably more legally tenable than my thought, which was to subject the executive staff responsible to decimation.

    2. Re:And if they really want to make nice by tyen · · Score: 1

      If Tilak Mandadi (LinkedIn profile not updated yet to reflect his Disney CIO/Parks position) did not actually orchestrate the restructuring himself (perhaps he was instructed from further up the executive chain), then he certainly did himself no favors by how he executed it (at least the announcement if not the actual restructuring logistics itself), oversaw the execution of it, and responded to it. If he's being muzzled by Disney from getting out in front of this story now with some spin control, then it is possible Disney has done so to keep him in their back pocket to throw under the bus if the legal and/or financial blow back from the story gets too hot.

      So even if you see a "direct the termination of the executive responsible", it is entirely possible that the real architect(s) of the in-all-but-name layoff remain untouched, and you are only seeing the sacking of a scapegoat, even if they have a "CIO" in their title (he's CIO of a large division, but not over all of Disney). If instead something happened along the lines of Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services and HCL America (the contractors identified in the story) get their H1-B allotments catastrophically cut back (like 75-80%) with a maximum absolute cap set to the cut back level based on the 2014 allotment, for 7 years, then you would see very extreme avoidance of these kinds of restructurings in the future. Even if the H1-B program continues to exist, and even if American companies solicit for this kind of restructuring, there isn't a sales manager in the world who would allow that kind of deal through. Also effective would be to change the H1-B legislation so allotments become a granted privilege served at the pleasure of politics, not a protected right enjoying contractual legal protection, to nullify legal challenges to allotment changes, and let the executive (agency or President) or legislative branches alter the allotments by company. This would give the contracting companies a much greater incentive to solicit for more creatively value-added business, rather than extractive displacement-heavy business, as the political optics for any displacements (real or perceived) are just too much of a headache to deal with.

    3. Re:And if they really want to make nice by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Machiavelli called the role the "Bad Lieutenant". The "nice" leaders have all the bad things done by the BL and then are "shocked" to find the BL did bad things and fire the BL.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re:And if they really want to make nice by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Firing is not the only option. One technique is to descend on the thoroughly beaten-down city or whatever, and publicly try and execute the BL, while making things a tiny bit better. Of course, do this too many times and you have problems with the BL union.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  12. Re:Job security by DivineKnight · · Score: 2

    That depends. How much do you value your freedom?

  13. Why would anybody do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you knew that you were being fired anyway, why on Earth would you assent to training your replacement? If somebody told me that, I'd march into their office and say "You, and ESPECIALLY your family, can get fucked." Then I'd hock a loogie on their desk and walk out, flipping the office the bird on the way.

    Is it the "don't burn your bridges and get a good reference" thing? Because if it were me, I'd be much more impressed with a candidate that was willing to stand up for themselves than I would be with somebody who meekly put up with something like this. Some people (such as H1-B supporters) are just fundamentally bad human beings and need to be called out on it. That's not a bad thing. I'd rather have principled workers than mindless drones.

    1. Re:Why would anybody do this? by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because they offer you severance pay and other benefits which you forfeit if you don't.

      Disney is also a special case in Florida because it's THE major employer in the Orlando area. If you burn your bridges there, it's unlikely you'll work in that town again. (Not that it mattered because they were blocking people from coming back as contractors anyway but I think that's a legal issue issue, not a personal one - EG Contractors who worked at a company long term were found to be defacto employees by a court ruling against Microsoft several years ago - To get around that ruling contractors have to have a "rest" period of more than a year or else they might get to sue the company. I suspect Disney's actions for not hiring back the employees as contractors right away is probably to get around that.)

    2. Re:Why would anybody do this? by rkhalloran · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is that in some cases, the workers' severance packages have been directly tied to said training. If you had something lined up immediately it might not matter, but if you needed some cash to tide you over while you job-hunted, it might be necessary to swallow your pride and deal with it.

    3. Re:Why would anybody do this? by CWCheese · · Score: 1

      Just surmising that as an AC poster, you're likely not in the 50-55 age group where you can't just 'hock a loogie on their desk and walk out' without giving up your pension and or 401 vesting, etc. and expect to go find another job. If you are a 50+ and are secure enough to spit in their face, then good for you. Have had too many associates in industry who've been faced with that dilemma, and middle age folks have a lot to lose, thus feet of clay vs young workers who know no fear.

      --
      Have a Day!
    4. Re:Why would anybody do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you burn your bridges there, it's unlikely you'll work in that town again. (Not that it matters because Orlando fucking sucks.)

      FTFY.

    5. Re:Why would anybody do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would train them so they have negative productivity

    6. Re:Why would anybody do this? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Disney is also a special case in Florida because it's THE major employer in the Orlando area. If you burn your bridges there, it's unlikely you'll work in that town again

      FWIW, Lockheed Martin has two large plants in Orlando, both I believe with something on the order of 1,000 engineers. One does a lot of simulation work, and some general government contracting, and the other does a lot of heavy-duty government contracting on weapon systems, making stuff like missiles. Having worked in one of them (almost two decades ago), I don't believe they give two shits about Disney.

      If you are instead doing theme-park related work, there are several other competing theme parks in the area. And then a half-hour drive to the east you have Cape Canveral.

      Not that losing a job doesn't suck, but there are lots of local options outside of Disney.

    7. Re:Why would anybody do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some cases (HP for example) they don't literally tell you you're "training your replacement". They sort of imply that you "might" still have a job after it's done. Then a "workforce reduction" is done to you.

      Reference the news with Whitman moving support jobs to China (a few weeks ago). Same was done with India, Puerto Rico and Costa Rica.

      We don't see anyone making a stink over that, do we?

      Posting as A.C. intentionally. Guess why?

  14. what is this supposed to accomplish? by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, so you thoroughly demotivate your workers. You insult them. You treat them like idiots. Yeah, we think so little of your jobs that we're going to import untrained minimum wage foreigners to replace you, and oh, by the way, before you leave, you have to train them which button to push when the light comes on.

    You even complete the layoffs of one division. (Florida.)

    And then, responding to Bad Press, as part of damage control, you tell the remaining employees that they get to keep their jobs. At least, for now, until the news cycle passes.

    What employee in their right mind would *not* spend every moment looking for a new job at that point? What responsible individual (financially responsible to self and family) would *not* use this opportunity as paid job search?

    So, Disney may have quieted down some small portion of the uproar. But they're still going to lose all of that tribal knowledge, guaranteed. And they're going to have the most disgruntled, (old workers) and nonfunctional (imported workers with no training or support) IT department of any company still in business.

    I foresee a time when the Pirates of the Caribbean ride is populated with live H1-B actors, because nobody can figure out how to make the animatronics work anymore. Might be an improvement, except the guests will have to swim through the moat.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:what is this supposed to accomplish? by Dracos · · Score: 2

      This saga illustrates exactly what the H1-B program is designed to accomplish: disenfranchise highly skilled US workers and replace them with cheaper foreign workers.

      If corporations still treated employees as value-adding assets rather than cost liabilities, crap like H1-B wouldn't exist.

    2. Re:what is this supposed to accomplish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I know people I *so* want to buy tickets for to Disney World, where they can takes rides whose safety is assured by disgruntled IT workers and their minimum wage overseas replacements.

    3. Re:what is this supposed to accomplish? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Corporations never treated employees that way. I suggest you re-read about how corporations used to treat workers in the late 1800s through the mid 1900s. Almost no one was being treated as value-adding assets. If H1-Bs existed in the 50s and 60s they would have used them just as much as they try to today.

    4. Re:what is this supposed to accomplish? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > If corporations still treated employees as value-adding assets rather than cost liabilities, crap like H1-B wouldn't exist.

      I would say, if corporations recognized that employees are value-adding assets rather than cost liabilities. Because we are. We're not asking corporations to "spread the wealth", we're asking them to recognize the reality that what we do is important to the company.

      Every outsource disaster points up the fact that management really had no idea what contribution their employees were making. Somehow they got sold (usually by some outsource salescritter) on the idea that, no, it's a dead simple job. An orangutan could do it. Just hire the cheapest labor you can find, have your old crew write out a few procedures before you kick them out, and, $$profit$$!

      And then... later they have to use creative accounting to show that yes, we really did save money. Really. Trust me.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:what is this supposed to accomplish? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      John Hammond: All major theme parks have delays. When they opened Disneyland in 1956, nothing worked!

      Dr. Ian Malcolm: Yeah, but, John, if The Pirates of the Caribbean breaks down, the pirates don't eat the tourists.

      Give it time....

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:what is this supposed to accomplish? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If H1-Bs existed in the 50s and 60s they would have used them just as much as they try to today.

      Like the bracero program for Mexican workers?

    7. Re:what is this supposed to accomplish? by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      This saga illustrates exactly what the H1-B program is designed to accomplish: disenfranchise highly skilled US workers and replace them with cheaper foreign workers.

      It's not at all designed to do that. The fact that some companies are (mis)using it that way doesn't mean that it was created with that (mis)use in mind. The loopholes need to be closed, or rules enforced (or changed) to limit the undesired uses, and promote the desired ones (i.e. bringing in highly skilled workers to fill in critical positions).

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    8. Re:what is this supposed to accomplish? by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      I'd estimate you could solve some large portion of the problem just by banning Tata and Infosys from using them. Those are the two primary sources of abuse of the H-1B program right there.

    9. Re:what is this supposed to accomplish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will just switch from layoff replacement to attrition replacement. Same net just longer timeline without the bad press. This change at Disney should not in any way stop the H1B visa issues/actions/reactions that these stories created. H1B's need to be reworked and highly regulated to stop this behavior.

    10. Re:what is this supposed to accomplish? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      It's not at all designed to do that.

      Sure it was.

      The fact that some companies are (mis)using it that way doesn't mean that it was created with that (mis)use in mind. The loopholes need to be closed, or rules enforced (or changed) to limit the undesired uses, and promote the desired ones (i.e. bringing in highly skilled workers to fill in critical positions).

      They aren't "misusing" it at all. Those loopholes were put there intentionally. It's pretty cute that you think the industries that bought the H-1B program somehow were only doing it for honorable reasons.

  15. Re:Job security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Important enough that they couldn't "just" be replaced by H-1B workers that were supposed to have skills that were unavailable in the US, the current employees were being required to train the H-1B workers in order to give them the skills and knowledge they needed to perform the job.

    BTW, importance of the job has fuck-all to do with the boss getting their quarterly bonus for cutting payroll.

  16. In other words.. by Nukenbar · · Score: 2

    You have a bit more time to polish up your resumes. Don't treat it as anything else.

  17. They'll try again by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    Economic reality makes cheap labour too tempting. They will try again. They only need to try once, with insufficient negative reaction, for the move to go through. Then a move in the reverse direction will seem so expensive as to be unworkable.

    "Today we were unlucky, but remember we only have to be lucky once. You will have to be lucky always." -- IRA after the Brighton bombing failed to kill Margaret Thatcher.

    --
    John_Chalisque
  18. I sent Disney a mail.. by Stu101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I sent Disney a mail to the office of the CEO and complained about the terrible treatment of those American workers (I am not American BTW) but I did get a reply and I like to think that everyone who did the same helped with the cause.

    People laughed when I said I had done it, but it proves I did a tiny bit to help some jobs and I feel good, damnit :)

    --
    http://www.writeitfor.us - Writing IT for the IT generation.
    1. Re:I sent Disney a mail.. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      They're still going to get laid off. Disney has just delayed it a little bit.

  19. Doubt that will last long. by ErichTheRed · · Score: 2

    I'm guessing this will continue until the public eye is no longer on them all the time. I've posted previously about this - Disney is not a low-margin business with a need to reduce IT spending. Just their theme parks alone must generate millions per day. To use a Disney analogy, they probably store all their free cash in Uncle Scrooge's money bin. They're very similar to the way Apple is right now -- Apple is immune to market forces; they take 30% of every purchase people make with their ultra high margin iPhones, and their margin on laptop and desktop PCs is stratospheric. Disney is immune to market forces simply because they have so many rabid fans.

    The fact that companies like this are resorting to H1-Bing their IT departments is very disturbing. Just because they're not doing this particular exercise doesn't mean they're not looking to do it when the heat is off later on. Again, I would expect this from a traditional retailer or similar low-margin business...not Disney.

    Unfortunately, I'm dealing with this now - a product manager in charge of one of the medium-margin products I do design/engineering work for has the offshoring, low cost country bug in their head right now. I can't hire anyone to supplement our staff locally, but I can have all the foreign contractors I want because "they're so cheap." I'm sure there's lots of success stories for the outsourcers to cite, but I've never had good luck. Basically, anything we hand over to an offshore team to implement has to be documented as if we were sitting there doing it, and they still come back with questions. The problem is this -- you will never convince an MBA that it's worth it to have a few people making more money than 50 people making 20% of what you're paying the onshore staff.

    1. Re:Doubt that will last long. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      " Just their theme parks alone must generate millions per day."

      No doubt. I wonder how much it costs to keep those parks open and functioning as expected.

      I'm pretty sure you meant " Just their theme parks alone must generate millions in profits per day."

      Which is the primary reason Disney operates them... And I'm sure you think Disney makes more than enough profit, and should reduce ticket prices, rehire employees previously laid off, and of course keep their IT staff in house and on shore, US Citizens, and be good corporate weasels.

      It's popular and attractive to condemn corporations for excess profits, and I'm not defending them, but it is also facile to whine 'profits!!!' and call every single corporate action a blatant abuse of the world, most specifically the part *you* inhabit. Or a friend who's been laid off. I know there is a real human cost for corporate decisions to offshore - I see it every single day I work, and it impacts me directly. It has cost me plenty of money personally. But your own experience leaves you working for such a den of corporate weasels. Like me, are you sucking it up, getting along, and and fighting the important fights, or do you give your management the same complaints you voice here?

      FWIW, I work somewhere I can in fact give full voice to my observations and complaints. SO far, I have not annoyed anyone sufficiently to risk retaliation, but I get the chance to make fervent pleas for different decisions. None are even acknowledged, so far...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:Doubt that will last long. by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

      " Like me, are you sucking it up, getting along, and and fighting the important fights, or do you give your management the same complaints you voice here?"

      Yes, and just like you, I am luckily in a place where I can at least complain and be heard without getting kicked out. Our group just keeps moving along, continuing to turn out good work even if we have to clean up messes. The naive hope is that decision makers will eventually see how much mess cleaning we've been doing (all of which has been reported in a very non-"See, I told you so!" manner.) I'm not totally against outsourcing, but I can't stand when it doesn't work, and when the decision makers aren't smart enough to notice. Our company is easily 5 or 6 years out of phase with current HR trends, so they're just starting to notice problems now that they've gone on a full blown early 2000's style offshoring rampage.

      I've worked with a lot of people in the past who just complain bitterly and lose all interest in doing their job when stuff like this happens. That's exactly what you don't want to do. Like you said, fighting about the important stuff rather than biting back on every little thing is the way to stay sane.

      My problem isn't with Disney's profits, it's the fact that they don't have to resort to tactics like this, but they do anyway.

    3. Re:Doubt that will last long. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Them having friends and fans is changing.

      Disney used to be a household name. It used to be the thing kids grow up with and love. That's over. Kids today view Mickey and Donald as something outdated and not really cool anymore. "For kids", petty and lame.

      And no kid wants something that's considered "for kids".

      What's left is parents who want some "family friendly" bullshit for their kids and kids that accept it if there ain't something better (read: whatever the current manga du jour is) available.

      Disney ain't so "cool" anymore. If anything, it's considered dated and old fashioned by today's kids.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Doubt that will last long. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's very acceptable to make profit. As long as it's done by the rules, the ones making the profit pay their share of taxes and they obey the rules of the market.

      It's NOT acceptable if the profit is made only by bribing politicians, buying copyright extensions again and again, mistreating their employees and generally being a pest on society and economy.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Doubt that will last long. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is probably part of the reason they bought something "hot" like Marvel.

    6. Re:Doubt that will last long. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just their theme parks alone must generate millions per day

      I work with a guy who used to work there in the early 90s. They rake in mounds of cash every day. He told me just 1 popcorn stand is expected to pull in a minimum of 1 million dollars per year. He said they had the nicest damn popcorn carts you have ever seen. http://www.themeparkinsider.co... well you can do the math at 100 bucks a head plus incidentals...

      "they're so cheap." Having seen at least 5 of these fuckup projects up and close. Lets just say you get exactly what you pay for. You pay cheap you get cheap. I had to scrap every single project. Ask them what it would cost if they have to scrap the whole project?

  20. for 1099ers W2 contractors working for a firm / ou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for 1099ers W2 contractors working for a firm / outsource don't fail under that rule.

  21. Re:I'd like to see a permanet disney 'evil counter by digitalPhant0m · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you could site some articles so the rest of us can be educated as to why they are evil?

    I'm not in the habit of taking people's word for it.

  22. Where have I heard this before? by blue9steel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.
    Perhaps you think you're being treated unfairly?
    Good. You know it would be unfortunate if I had to leave a garrison here.

    1. Re:Where have I heard this before? by 31415926535897 · · Score: 2

      Well, it is a paragraph that Disney owns...

    2. Re:Where have I heard this before? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.

      So your argument is that the engineers should break into the set where they are shooting the new Star Wars film, load everyone onto the Millennium Falcon, and go looking for a convenient exhaust shaft at Disney Corporate HQ to shoot a plasma bolt down?

    3. Re:Where have I heard this before? by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      That's later. For now they mostly run around and either get shot by stormtroopers or stepped on by AT-ATs.

    4. Re:Where have I heard this before? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'd buy a ticket to see that.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  23. Sell, sell, sell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess Disney peaked and it is time to sell. https://www.google.com/search?q=disney+stock+price&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

  24. Re:I'd like to see a permanet disney 'evil counter by Travco · · Score: 1

    I recommend a google search "disney + evil". Should be eye opening

  25. Re:I'd like to see a permanet disney 'evil counter by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Informative

    The most obvious one is the Disney Copyright Extension Act

    After making piles of money on stuff from the public domain, Disney has fought to have copyrights almost perpetually extended. Almost every major film title Disney released for several decades was co-opting stuff in the public domain.

    Di$ney is a ruthless corporation, always has been. They'll steam roll over anybody who gets in their way.

    start here.

    Honestly, if you've never heard any of this, you've been living under a rock for decades.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  26. Like this will be going away... by cj9er · · Score: 1

    Yet, in firms like IBM, it is OK to do it internally. No uproar about that, sure, OK, whatever. Pick and choose what looks best...

    1. Re:Like this will be going away... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      It also helps to fire the bottom 10% of the workforce each year. The routine churn of hiring and firing will help disguise any large replacement of American employees with H1B workers.

    2. Re:Like this will be going away... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      No uproar over IBM outsourcing? Have you been living under a rock?

    3. Re:Like this will be going away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STEM plus YOU = THINK Differently
      Ad at the bottom of the page is so f-ing appropriate.

    4. Re:Like this will be going away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more IBM outsource, the lower their perceived (and actual) quality and the less attractive they are as a top tier solution provider. I've worked at three companies now that no longer use IBM services because the quality has dropped so low that it's better to just find your own team of Indians to do the same (or better) work at 1/10th the price. Besides, the last lot of IBMers we had working with us were desperate to jump ship. The culture there is utterly toxic.

  27. Re:Job security by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

    The "temporary" part of the H-1 visa was eliminated decades ago.

  28. Re:See, I told you we're all family here at Disney by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a small world after all!

  29. Quick pro-tip by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    "We were told our jobs were continuing and we should consider it as if nothing had happened until further notice."

    Pro-tip: act as if something did happen and get another job quickly. In their eyes the problem is that they were exposed, not that they did this in the first place. They will almost certainly still do it.

  30. Re:for 1099ers W2 contractors working for a firm / by Frobnicator · · Score: 4, Informative

    for 1099ers W2 contractors working for a firm / outsource don't fail under that rule.

    That's an unfortunately common misunderstanding.

    There are a lot of things bunched into the "contractor" name in recent years:
    A. Working for a company under a 1099 tax reporting system, the person operates under their own business independent of the company. This is a real "independent contractor".
    B. Working for a company under a W2 tax reporting system, the regular employee loses their job at the end of the temporary employment. This is a temporary worker or contingent employment.
    C. Working for a company under a W2 tax reporting system, but that company is closely working with another company and the individual is assigned to work under their purview. This has many different names.

    The guidelines they are supposed to use, which Microsoft and many others have gotten in trouble with, is when they bring in people in group A -- independent contractors under the 1099 tax system -- and treat them as though they are group B or C -- regular employees under the W2 tax system whose employment contract may or may not have a built-in termination date. This is mostly about tax differences, since the government generally gets less revenue from option A.

    Many companies will bring in people through contracting companies like Deloitte or SAP. That is case C. These people are employed by one company as regular employees, and the two businesses have a working agreement. The individual is a regular worker and needs to have all the regular labor laws followed. This arrangement can happen for many years. Giving non-technical examples, you may have a car rental company with a single worker at an auto repair facility, or have building security hired through one company where the individuals report to work at the facility yet are hired, paid, and given other benefits by another business.

    To confuse things, many times the companies involved in option C will hire their workers under option B. The workers are brought in from a separate company like Deloitte (option C), and those workers are hired by Deloitte as W2 workers with a temporary employment agreement (option B).

    Unfortunately for workers, big companies often confuse the rules for them, calling them all "contractors" and dumping them under the same rules. Workers who were hired under option A must be able to work for additional groups. Companies get in trouble with option A when they keep the person too long since they stop looking like independent contractors and start looking like regular employees. When companies lay off lots of "contractors", usually they are laying off people under option B or C, but then refuse to hire them again because that is a rule for those under option A.

    --
    //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  31. Re:I'd like to see a permanet disney 'evil counter by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Or you could read the article that explained it. Wow....

  32. Re:I'd like to see a permanet disney 'evil counter by Last+Warrior · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work for another company that has been doing this sort of thing for a long time. But instead of laying off employees and bringing on H1B's, they are bringing on recent college graduates that are also only H!B's and then making working conditions unbearable until the old timers here just leave out of frustration. There is such a high turn over rate here that we have all but stopped acknowledging when people leave. I am currently training 2 people and an expecting a third and I have to do this in addition to all other tasks that are assigned to me.

    I miss the days when I could go to a first round in-person interview and get the job before walking out of the door. I am looking, but I am not having so much luck.

    I think the problem is that many silicon Valley companies are employing these same sorts of strategies. Driving down wages by bringing in H1B's. Its like the management team reads in a business journal how all their competitors are doing this and they think that they have to do it too to keep up with the jones'. I think this is unethical and at worst, probably of questionable legality. theH1b program was designed to provide workers to supplement the workforce here because there weren't enough engineers to fill available positions. Now, the system is being used to replace engineers here with cheaper labor. This is not consistent with the intent of the provisions of H1b.

  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. Oops! by TaleSpinner · · Score: 1

    "Oh! We didn't know that gun was loaded! Gee, whillickers, sorry about that!"

    "We didn't think that part of the H1B law about hiring Americans FIRST really applied to us!

  35. Treat it like nothing happened by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Sure. I will. I just so happen to enjoy reading the tech jobs ads. It's my pastime. Oh, btw, could I have the day off tomorrow, I have an interv... I mean I have to act like nothing happened.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  36. Re:Job security by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, H-1B is considered dual-intent: the employer has the option to terminate the employee and pay for travel back to the holder's country; and the holder has the option to transfer to another employer (in a timely manner?) and/or apply for permanent residency. I don't think it's any easier to apply for permanent residency just because you hold an H-1B, but the point is, you can apply.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  37. Everyone who is outraged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with Disney's attitude towards their employees has an easy way to show their displeasure. Just don't go to buy any Disney theme parks or products. Sure it is hard to find things Disney doesn't have its fingers in but just stop going to their theme parks and stop going to their movies would be a good start.

  38. Now people changed their minds on outsourcing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it ironically sad how many people post "changing my mind on outsourcing" after they are let go due to outsourcing of their own jobs.

  39. What a plus in the Google. by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Not only was it read, taken seriously, and a wrong righted; but as studies has previously proved by a post from one of the only of a handful of people who used Google +.

    1. Re:What a plus in the Google. by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Not only was it read, taken seriously, and a wrong righted; but as studies has previously proved by a post from one of the only of a handful of people who used Google +.

      I might of at least posted the link https://plus.google.com/+Keith...

  40. Walt Dickme by TiggertheMad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I feel conflicted...On one hand, Disney is yet again, being a shitty company and I feel bad that all these employees are being put through the wringer. On the other hand, if you are gullible enough to take a job at a company like Disney, you kind of deserve what you get.

    I have a suspicion that a lot of Disney employees are like people that get jobs in the AAA game industry: They think that because they love the product that is produced, the job and working conditions will somehow be good.

    Open message to anyone working for or thinking about it Disney: Research the companies history before you take a job These are shitty, shitty people that are in charge of making all these lovable characters.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  41. Re:I'd like to see a permanet disney 'evil counter by KermodeBear · · Score: 2

    That article needs to be updated with this H1-B situation.

    I would do it myself, at least add a section with a few references and get it started, but every time I edit an article on Wikipedia my contributions are automatically reverted for some reason I cannot fathom. The Encyclopedia anyone can edit... Yeah right. I apparently need to be in some special club or something.

    --
    Love sees no species.
  42. Mod parent up by Prien715 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Disney is making money hand-over-fist and it's all going to lazy people who don't work there (also known as "shareholders").

    I sometimes imagine what would happen if there were a union big enough to call a national strike for all server-farms.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  43. Disney signed the letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the RINOs are ramming TPP and Common Core (proselytizing Islam) down our throats, the other side of 'immigration' and Obamacare they are not telling you about .

    McDonald's CEO signed the letter,

    and Walt Disney Company? yep.

    Oops! Coca Cola and US steel are on the list ...

    If you're any working American citizen paying taxes ... ... 'you' will still have to make up the difference for Obamacare EXEMPT congress and congressional staff, EXEMPT white house staff, EXEMPT (certain) unions, EXEMPT ACORN types (by whatever name they have now), exempt Obama phonies and EXEMPT illegal invaders. ... exempt illegal invaders will have first preference for jobs:

    If you're a black US citizen, or Asian, gay, a student, woman, a Latino US citizen (even you white idiot liberals) you'd better read this.

    If your employer is on the list (below), you better read this. ... yep, ... why businesses are in such a panic to pass 'Illegal Invasion'. If they pass 'immigration', businesses won't have to pay into Obamacare because they layed off US citizens and hired amnestied, exempt immigrants and Muslim refugees and who in turn exempt the businesses, who do you think will be forced to make up the difference?

    Google:
    'Obamacare Loophole Provides Incentive For Employers To Hire Illegal Aliens Over US Citizens'

    The CEO's involved in this remain out of the news while they are destroying our country through our 'so-called' representatives.

    We need to expose each one of these traitors.

    Here's the list, it's a long list too -

    Google:

    Cheesecake Factory, Hallmark, Disney, and Others Now Pushing ...

    www.cis.org/ feere/ cheesecake-factory-hallmark-disney-and-others-now-pushing-amnesty

    We need the names of the CEO’s that are engaging in this war on US citizens.

    -Do you or do you know someone who works at one of these companies?

    -Put this list on your bulletin board.

    -Show this list when going out for lunch.

    -Give this list to your buyers and sales reps.

    - Check this list when planning a vacation or weekend trip.

    -Pass copies of this list at local election campaigns.

    Put futile party affiliations and self interests aside and ...

    Vote OUT all RINOs and democrats like your job, wealth, health, privacy, your kids well being, our states rights, our county's sovereignty, our Constitution and your LIFE depends on it.

    NOVEMBER 2016

    And yet still another other side of amnesty they're not telling you about:

    Not one campaigner has yet to speak the word: "Muslim Immigration Jihad" or 'Hijra'.

    The vast majority of Americans have no idea how the USA is being over run and who soon will have majority vote and MSM is keeping it all quiet:

    https://youtu.be/6PzT8vEvYPg

    Check out new refugees in Detroit, Washington DC, Cedar Rapids, Paterson, Dearborn, Philadelphia, New York, Boston, etc., etc. and you're subsidizing them.

    US citizens are forced to pay for this coup de 'etat against the US Constitution, Bill of Rights and our total submission to Islam Sharia. yep ... along with subsidizing them as they replace US citizen's jobs, housing, health benefits, food stamps and each will get an Obama phone after they're here?

    Obama stash (our taxes).

    Ever wonder why so many unscreened Muslim refugees are ...

    www.barenakedislam.com/ 2015/ 05/ 20/ ever-wonder-why-so-many-unscreened-muslim-refugees-are-suddenly-flood ing-into-america/

    May 20, 2015 ... Muslim Refugee Resettlement and the 'Hijra' (Muslim Immigration Jihad)

    Now consider middle east Christian mass persecutions, atrocities and killings?? ... they aren't eligible to get refugee status and Obama stash? ... get it?

  44. Expose these CEOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the RINOs are ramming TPP and Common Core (proselytizing Islam) down our throats, the other side of 'immigration' and Obamacare they are not telling you about .

    McDonald's CEO signed the letter,

    and Walt Disney Company? yep.

    Oops! Coca Cola and US steel are on the list ...

    If you're any working American citizen paying taxes ... ... 'you' will still have to make up the difference for Obamacare EXEMPT congress and congressional staff, EXEMPT white house staff, EXEMPT (certain) unions, EXEMPT ACORN types (by whatever name they have now), exempt Obama phonies and EXEMPT illegal invaders. ... exempt illegal invaders will have first preference for jobs:

    If you're a black US citizen, or Asian, gay, a student, woman, a Latino US citizen (even you white idiot liberals) you'd better read this.

    If your employer is on the list (below), you better read this. ... yep, ... why businesses are in such a panic to pass 'Illegal Invasion'. If they pass 'immigration', businesses won't have to pay into Obamacare because they layed off US citizens and hired amnestied, exempt immigrants and Muslim refugees and who in turn exempt the businesses, who do you think will be forced to make up the difference?

    Google:
    'Obamacare Loophole Provides Incentive For Employers To Hire Illegal Aliens Over US Citizens'

    The CEO's involved in this remain out of the news while they are destroying our country through our 'so-called' representatives.

    Is it the same group listed below that is undermining American citizens by trying to get TPP passed?

    We need to expose each one of these traitors.

    Here's the list, it's a long list too -

    Google:

    Cheesecake Factory, Hallmark, Disney, and Others Now Pushing ...

    www.cis.org/ feere/ cheesecake-factory-hallmark-disney-and-others-now-pushing-amnesty

    We need the names of the CEO’s that are engaging in this war on US citizens.

    -Do you or do you know someone who works at one of these companies?

    -Put this list on your bulletin board.

    -Show this list when going out for lunch.

    -Give this list to your buyers and sales reps.

    - Check this list when planning a vacation or weekend trip.

    -Pass copies of this list at local election campaigns.

    Put futile party affiliations and self interests aside and ...

    Vote OUT all RINOs and democrats like your job, wealth, health, privacy, your kids well being, our states rights, our county's sovereignty, our Constitution and your LIFE depends on it.

    NOVEMBER 2016

    And yet still another other side of amnesty they're not telling you about:

    Not one campaigner has yet to speak the word: "Muslim Immigration Jihad" or 'Hijra'.

    The vast majority of Americans have no idea how the USA is being over run and who soon will have majority vote and MSM is keeping it all quiet:

    https://youtu.be/6PzT8vEvYPg

    Check out new refugees in Detroit, Washington DC, Cedar Rapids, Paterson, Dearborn, Philadelphia, New York, Boston, etc., etc. and you're subsidizing them.

    US citizens are forced to pay for this coup de 'etat against the US Constitution, Bill of Rights and our total submission to Islam Sharia. yep ... along with subsidizing them as they replace US citizen's jobs, housing, health benefits, food stamps and each will get an Obama phone after they're here?

    Obama stash (our taxes).

    HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS unscreened Muslim refugees (no Christian refugees allowed) are ALREADY HERE.

    www.barenakedislam.com/ 2015/ 05/ 20/ ever-wonder-why-so-many-unscreened-muslim-refugees-are-suddenly-flood ing-into-america/

    May 20, 2015 ... Muslim Refugee Resettlement and the 'Hijra' (Muslim Immigration Jihad)

    Now consider middle east Christian mass persecutions, atrocities and killings?? ... they aren't eligible to get refugee status and Obama stash? ... get it?

  45. He was forced to use Google+ by musixman · · Score: 1

    " in a Google+ post."

    Wow, just when you think the world isn't bad enough. The unemployed are now forced to use Google+ to post messages to the world.

  46. Disney Layoffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they need to fire the ones who caused the would be layoffs .

  47. This is just a no op... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They will simply change from a layoff model to an attrition replacement model, replacing US workers over time with H1Bs. Same net effect just a longer timeline. H1Bs need to be fixed and regulated properly.

  48. Disney goers by MariaAlberto · · Score: 1

    People should postpone their Disney vacation in protest.

  49. Y'all are acting like this is all new by Loopy · · Score: 2

    HP did the exact same thing, but rather than using H1B people here in the US, they just completely outsourced everything to Foxconn, Lite-on, etc. Many of us in the PC/software industry have been training replacements since the end of the 20th century. Interestingly enough, it's the small shops where our skills are still valued. I suspect that's because small shops are still dynamic environments where the ability to think outside of the box and make qualitative judgements on a daily basis is valued, as opposed to entrenched organizations that have well-documented tools and processes that anyone with sufficient reading comprehension skills can follow step-by-step and get some work done.

    We now return you to your regularly scheduled outrage.

  50. disrespecting workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... made laid-off workers train their foreign replacements ...

    Another question: How much training did Disney provide to their domestic employees? The mega-corps practice on-demand employment then complain nobody's got the skill-set they want. But instead of training local people, the mega-corp can afford to import foreigners and then train them. There's only one practical reason to do this: To make employees disposable, to remove their rights and reduce their wages. Disney got caught trying to dispose of their legally-protected employees. Notice that disposable employees are never HR clerks, lawyers, mid-level managers, accountants. Certain knowledge skills are deemed universal and undifferentiated.

    This disrespect of knowledge workers in the IT industry, who are mostly self-trained, is a nation-wide disease. I think the reason this affects support and development jobs is a matter of metrics: It's difficult to measure the indirect costs, opportunity costs, quality, accuracy and scheduling dependencies between coder (or help-desk) and the application (or problem resolution). Until these can be systematically calculated, software development will be an art not an engineered process. Likewise, managers will fixate on on monetary costs, not the completeness and correctness of the finished job.

  51. Enabling Quitting by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    What Disney will do instead is start trimming a little bit here and there and making it more difficult for current workers to stay. In the long run it will be the same result. This is just spin management.

  52. Why single out Disney? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong, I am happy to see Disney criticized.

    But tech companies like: IBM, Microsoft, and Facebook, are *far* worse H1B abusers than Disney.

    And Indian contracting firms are probably a bigger H1B scammer than the US companies combined.

    I guess everybody will figure that the problem has been solved now.

  53. Re:Job security by slew · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's any easier to apply for permanent residency just because you hold an H-1B, but the point is, you can apply.

    Although it technically might be easily apply for permanent residency, depending on your situation, the only realistic chance you have is if you have some "in" like an H-1B.

    Depending on your personal situation, it is generally *much* easier to obtain permanent residency if you hold an H-1B visa. The generic option for most people is to get married to a US citizen or enter the green-card lottery (aka the diversity visa program). For example, if you are married already, or if you happen to be coming from a country that sources a large number US immigrants (say india or china), or don't happen to be world class at anything in demand, an H-1B is likely to be the only realistic option to get permanent residency status in your lifetime (other than maybe to have an anchor baby and wait until your kid turns 21 and can sponsor you for permanent residency).

  54. Mickey can go STICK IT. by hackus · · Score: 1

    "...we should consider it as if nothing had happened until further notice."

    I will die before I take my friends or family to a Disney anything ever again.

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  55. Correction... by hydrodog · · Score: 1

    Disney actually DID fire a couple of hundred people. This is the second round at Disney ABC, where they changed their minds after getting caught misusing H1B visas to take jobs away from US workers.

  56. Re:Job security by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    My point was that some visas/work permits let you apply for permanent residency while you're in status (e.g., H-1B) and others require that you return to your home country first (e.g., J-1.)

    (IANA immigration L)

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  57. Re: Job security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The current management would have required with millions of dollars. It is not their problems anymore

  58. Re:Job security by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

    Well of course. Industry couldn't use the program to displace US workers as long as the H-1 visa was still only for temporary workers. That is exactly why they got the temporary part of the H-1 visa removed.

  59. ones and twos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As others have suggested, Disney Lame and the tragic Kingdom will do it, in ones and twos, small layoffs that look like attrition not a large aggressive effort to replace workers with cheaper labor. Or they will do it with a re-org and just cut, then claim worker shortages and bring in the H-1B's. Their is any number of scenarios to keep this slimy move by Disney under wraps. The Key word here is slimy, and since this has happened I and my family will not be patrons of Disney in any fashion. See how the House of Mouse likes taking it up the keyster !!!

  60. Re:I'd like to see a permanet disney 'evil counter by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    It's also dangerous to the business, since getting rid of people who know what they're doing and replacing them with the cheapest you can find is going to have consequences.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  61. Re:I'd like to see a permanet disney 'evil counter by dbIII · · Score: 1

    theH1b program was designed to provide workers to supplement the workforce here because there weren't enough engineers to fill available positions

    It was very definitely designed to drive down salaries by bringing back indentured servitude despite whatever sugar coating you may have been told it has.

  62. There are good reasons for that by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Every outsource disaster points up the fact that management really had no idea what contribution their employees were making

    Dealing with layoffs personally is difficult on many levels so in many cases it gets delegated to junior HR types who really have no idea what contribution their employees were making and do not have time to find out before deadline. So that idiot playing farmville all day instead of working gets to decide your fate.
    Also there's the "modern" idea of hands-off management where a manager is apparently able to manage without having a clue what the core business of the org they are running does. Thus things like the CEO of an electricity generating company that gets driven all the way out to the power plant for meetings yet never sets foot in anything other than the admin building (has a chance to learn some basics about what the org does but does not bother to look). That idiot I'm using as an example made some choices that led to a city of one and a half million people being blacked out for a month, but there are plenty more that manage/mismanage with the same style.