"With the Star Wars saga ending, Lucas now struggles with how to reinvent himself."
I wouldn't be suprised if we see Star Wars, the musical. Choreographed by Lucas himself. Except the actors will be droids and Lucas will command them from a mothership hovering over the stage.
One problem with translating NL is that it can be very ambiguous.
Consider the subject of this post. Who has the telescope? Me? or the man on the hill?
Now, it would be quite a mess to realize your requirements, code or whatever artifact you're trying to express can have multiple interpretations. Then you go into damage control and cleanup.....not pretty.
Ok, I agree with some of the indifference out there on the UI. I mean, why do Microsoft and Apple (whom I like better than MS) think that just because they make a few audacious UI changes that it constitutes a "new OS".
If they were remotely with the program, they'd realize how trivial themes are in the sense that most of us can change our themes just by yawning (on linux of course).
Slashdot Mirror
Except for the 'confinement' of their 20 inch monitor...
Basically, your entire long-winded prose can be summed up as:
"Better tools=better games."
Gee, I never thought of that.
m
Just be on the lookout for 's 'OS K'. It is coming.
Actually, a Kiger is a mythical beast. It's probably my favorite animal and is a cross between a large predatory cat and a large predatory company.
In a shocking and unsuspected announcement, Apple will change their name to 'KApple' in an effort to patch relations with other Kommunities.
"With the Star Wars saga ending, Lucas now struggles with how to reinvent himself."
I wouldn't be suprised if we see Star Wars, the musical. Choreographed by Lucas himself. Except the actors will be droids and Lucas will command them from a mothership hovering over the stage.
And so what would the question be?
One problem with translating NL is that it can be very ambiguous. Consider the subject of this post. Who has the telescope? Me? or the man on the hill? Now, it would be quite a mess to realize your requirements, code or whatever artifact you're trying to express can have multiple interpretations. Then you go into damage control and cleanup.....not pretty.
Ok, I agree with some of the indifference out there on the UI. I mean, why do Microsoft and Apple (whom I like better than MS) think that just because they make a few audacious UI changes that it constitutes a "new OS". If they were remotely with the program, they'd realize how trivial themes are in the sense that most of us can change our themes just by yawning (on linux of course).
I though OOP was supposed to address the 'way we think about things' already. The paper advances nothing.