It just bugs me and reminds me of the comments that surrounded OneCare when it came out. In other words, microsoft was charging for insecure software and then charging again to fix the vulns that shouldn't have been there to begin with. Great business model. Besides, I've never seen much that caused me to believe that OneCare could do more than recognize a small percentage of malware out there.
Slashdot Mirror
It just bugs me and reminds me of the comments that surrounded OneCare when it came out. In other words, microsoft was charging for insecure software and then charging again to fix the vulns that shouldn't have been there to begin with. Great business model. Besides, I've never seen much that caused me to believe that OneCare could do more than recognize a small percentage of malware out there.