I agree with that entirely. It's by far the best way (except actually getting into the code and helping with development yourself, hehe). However some training/certification as well would'nt hurt, because with home system administeration there's bound to be a couple of gaps in one's knowledge.
Fact: it simply is'nt reasonable for a corperation to include someone else's browser when they make their own.
Fact: having no browser would also not work well.
Conclusion: No for-profit orginization should both make a browser and distribute an OS. (This is'nt what legaly what 'should' be, but more my views on what should make circumstances more ideal)
Slashdot Mirror
I would definitly use it over windoze, but I would never use it over x86 linux.
I agree with that entirely. It's by far the best way (except actually getting into the code and helping with development yourself, hehe). However some training/certification as well would'nt hurt, because with home system administeration there's bound to be a couple of gaps in one's knowledge.
Fact: it simply is'nt reasonable for a corperation to include someone else's browser when they make their own.
Fact: having no browser would also not work well.
Conclusion: No for-profit orginization should both make a browser and distribute an OS. (This is'nt what legaly what 'should' be, but more my views on what should make circumstances more ideal)