OK, that last post was pretty harsh. I must say though, that every time we have some news on Microsoft, Symantec, Google, or any other corporate super power, the common slashdot subscriber (even I may be guilty of this often) without proof or specific reference automatically assumes the corporate entity to be at fault. Anway, take that for what it's worth. I love slashdot and have been a valid reader/subscriber for a long times and will continue to be. Thanks,
Kratos, Dan
Asheville, NC...(yeah, I use windowsXP, but I'm a huge fan of Fedora3!)
Their product is not broken. Only if you have 2003 or earlier, and it has not been updated within the last 30 days. If that is the case, then my friend it is your own fault for not keeping you software up to date.
For once, I'd like an honest, unbiased report on some important news on Slashdot.org. It seams to me that the common article posters word their posting in such a way to daemonize the coporate companies regardless of circumstances. In this particular post for example, Symantec has acknoledged several older products without recent updates are vulnerable to this attack, but recent products and even older software with recent updates are protected against such threats.
http://www.techtree.com/techtree/jsp/showstory.jsp ?storyid=57565
Please control your anger against the corportate companies and recheck your facts. Thank you,
Dan Brown
Asheville, NC
Slashdot Mirror
It's a porch light in a small rural town in North Caroli... wait.. oh, I'm sorry, I thought you said light bulb.
This is Awesome, I Totally want one!! But It's been all over the tubes for Over a week now: http://gizmodo.com/386007/r2+d2-projector-in-action-video-verdict-a-must-have http://starwarsblog.starwars.com/index.php/2008/04/30/r2-d2-is-the-best-roomie-ever/ http://shop.starwars.com/catalog/product.xml?product_id=1218818
I wonder if it will have the links to all the porn sites I had up at the time of the crash as well.? Dan - western NC
OK, that last post was pretty harsh. I must say though, that every time we have some news on Microsoft, Symantec, Google, or any other corporate super power, the common slashdot subscriber (even I may be guilty of this often) without proof or specific reference automatically assumes the corporate entity to be at fault. Anway, take that for what it's worth. I love slashdot and have been a valid reader/subscriber for a long times and will continue to be. Thanks, Kratos, Dan Asheville, NC ...(yeah, I use windowsXP, but I'm a huge fan of Fedora3!)
Their product is not broken. Only if you have 2003 or earlier, and it has not been updated within the last 30 days. If that is the case, then my friend it is your own fault for not keeping you software up to date.
For once, I'd like an honest, unbiased report on some important news on Slashdot.org. It seams to me that the common article posters word their posting in such a way to daemonize the coporate companies regardless of circumstances. In this particular post for example, Symantec has acknoledged several older products without recent updates are vulnerable to this attack, but recent products and even older software with recent updates are protected against such threats. http://www.techtree.com/techtree/jsp/showstory.jsp ?storyid=57565
Please control your anger against the corportate companies and recheck your facts. Thank you,
Dan Brown
Asheville, NC
I believe it folds up into a briefcase for you to take in to the office once you finish your drive. ______ Kratos