Up till the last cycle, the Ruskys supported the likes of Sanders, just to try and fuck the American economy. They were too clueless to have any effect outside their 2%.
This time, Seth Rich exposed real dirt on the part of the Ds. They've got to blame someone.
If he was looking to build an empire, he would be growing his economy and damn everything else. But he needs to maintain his hold on power, which means he needs to feed Russian pride, even if it breaks them in the long run.
Russia's economy is smaller than California. Their is _no_ empire in their future.
Putin is playing to domestic politics. Russian pride is in play, they have to think they are still capable of empire. While actually going broke fighting with their former satellite state.
CO2 account for a tiny % of the total greenhouse gas effect on Earth. It's mostly water vapor.
For CO2 to be problem the models pull a CO2/H2O vapor positive feedback coefficient from a dark place. That coefficient is what accounts for the range of warmth predictions.
I know a utility that saved a little money on the power that ran the electric natural gas pumps for their biggest generator (pumps were in another utilities area) by putting the pumps on a curtailable contract (like 'peak corps' and other programs, that cut off your AC power when demand is highest).
So that means, when the demand was highest, that utility shutdown the supply pumps to PG&^H^H^H a large utilities biggest generator. Brilliant!
Spend the money on C-cells instead and the wife will _literally_ not bother you for weeks afterwards.
Teach the snot monkeys to sneak their own candy in, stop at the store before the show. Teach them by example to plan ahead and not be chumps. Let them see you bringing beers.
If I were in his shoes, I'd be single handedly responsible for bitcoin going to 10k$. Just from the flux of my money going through the system and landing someplace warm and with good banking secrecy laws. Also: I'd have long since bought an ocean crossing sailboat under a bogus name.
When I was a kid, the school bus drove by a one legged hooker almost every morning, at about dawn. That was one hard working hooker. We were little shits.
Wrong, your understanding of game theory is weak. (aside: We could have nuked the USSR in '46 but didn't. We were building a nuke/month at that point.)
How would anyone ever have 100% confidence, in a any system not tested in practice?
Not even an issue until the interceptor count gets into the same order of magnitude as the number of offensive missiles.
More fundamental: Historically nations go to war when it's more profitable than not. With modern weapons, that condition rarely happens, to say nothing of interdependent trade.
Slashdot Mirror
My congress people, particularly my senators, suck big wet festering donkey balls. I live in CA.
You point...disproved...'ask any American.'
Up till the last cycle, the Ruskys supported the likes of Sanders, just to try and fuck the American economy. They were too clueless to have any effect outside their 2%.
This time, Seth Rich exposed real dirt on the part of the Ds. They've got to blame someone.
Item4: What he gains: Credulous fools, like you, believe what they want to believe for longer. Duh.
Increased NATO spending will drive increased Rusky spending. NATO can afford it, Russia can't.
NATO that isn't completely dependant on America is NOT weaker. No matter how often you repeat the claim.
The only city in the USA that can comes close to Chicago for corruption is New Orleans. You can deny it all you want, doesn't change a thing.
What % of Illinois governors end up in prison?
Putin will bankrupt Russia in Crimea.
If he was looking to build an empire, he would be growing his economy and damn everything else. But he needs to maintain his hold on power, which means he needs to feed Russian pride, even if it breaks them in the long run.
Russia's economy is smaller than California. Their is _no_ empire in their future.
Putin is playing to domestic politics. Russian pride is in play, they have to think they are still capable of empire. While actually going broke fighting with their former satellite state.
There is a % of voters that want to have voted for the 'winner'. Yes I know, they're stupid.
By oversampling democrats the pollsters pushed those voters (2 or 3 %) to vote Hillary. She lost anyhow.
It would be hard not to LOL around the crybabies.
To add to the sib post.
CO2 account for a tiny % of the total greenhouse gas effect on Earth. It's mostly water vapor.
For CO2 to be problem the models pull a CO2/H2O vapor positive feedback coefficient from a dark place. That coefficient is what accounts for the range of warmth predictions.
I know a utility that saved a little money on the power that ran the electric natural gas pumps for their biggest generator (pumps were in another utilities area) by putting the pumps on a curtailable contract (like 'peak corps' and other programs, that cut off your AC power when demand is highest).
So that means, when the demand was highest, that utility shutdown the supply pumps to PG&^H^H^H a large utilities biggest generator. Brilliant!
I for one support grammer/speling pedant trolling AC's. Well done GP.
Spend the money on C-cells instead and the wife will _literally_ not bother you for weeks afterwards.
Teach the snot monkeys to sneak their own candy in, stop at the store before the show. Teach them by example to plan ahead and not be chumps. Let them see you bringing beers.
You can discuss it. Start with: 'Why do people continue to go to movie series when the last four have been incredible stinkers?'
Sure some people will just get butt hurt and walk away, that leaves you and the other adults to discuss it.
Incompetently secured is incompetently secured. Her server wasn't 'half pregnant'.
If it was 'Accidently, on purpose', this contractor is confused about the justice he will be getting vs what Hillary got.
As an executive, he had to file a bunch of paperwork with the SEC to sell. Until they fired him, now his hands are free.
When they _fire_ the CEO, CTO and Director of IT. They should publicly announce 'It wasn't a management issue, it was power.'
He's not a big cheese there anymore. So now he's free to sell without SEC notices etc.
Are his assets frozen?
If I were in his shoes, I'd be single handedly responsible for bitcoin going to 10k$. Just from the flux of my money going through the system and landing someplace warm and with good banking secrecy laws. Also: I'd have long since bought an ocean crossing sailboat under a bogus name.
He started with $680 million. We now know why bitcoin price has spiked. He's hiding it.
When I was a kid, the school bus drove by a one legged hooker almost every morning, at about dawn. That was one hard working hooker. We were little shits.
Less, you'd spike the price buying that much.
Wrong, your understanding of game theory is weak. (aside: We could have nuked the USSR in '46 but didn't. We were building a nuke/month at that point.)
How would anyone ever have 100% confidence, in a any system not tested in practice?
Not even an issue until the interceptor count gets into the same order of magnitude as the number of offensive missiles.
More fundamental: Historically nations go to war when it's more profitable than not. With modern weapons, that condition rarely happens, to say nothing of interdependent trade.
This has to be a payoff of some kind. 20,000 euro isn't enough to pay for significant 'Public Wifi'.
The money will disappear without a trace. Plop.