The level of cognitive dissonance required to support her make 'her people' rocks in this regard. They will stick with her to the end, claiming she was railroaded.
For computer people. Math problems start getting interesting when they are 'impossible to solve'.
We are not (all) mathematicians. Approximate solutions are useful. LP solvers are very useful applied math, even if I wouldn't want to write one myself.
Your job doesn't require you to work on hard mathematical problems. It's not unusual. At least 50% of programmers basically do nothing more complicated than bean counting with databases.
But there are programmers that use floats everyday. Not having any advanced math will limit you.
Does he have a server backup that he has setup to be delivered to the FBI on his death.
If he doesn't, he's a dead man.
God would have included an spelling and grammer mistake.
She is all things to all people.
Pedants need something to brighten their miserable existence.
Ultimately it shouldn't matter...
Because the next version of all smart devices should not update unless unlocked.
Let the FBI put that in their pipe and smoke it.
AC or court system. Who do I believe understands the law as a practical matter?
Face facts, you are wrong in any way that matters.
What does it take to get canned as a /. editor?
Did he RTFA or go a week without posting a dup?
She has girlfriends on the side too, perhaps they shared.
Mutual dirt keeps those two together. Bill can't have liked raising Web's daughter.
Mentally replace dailyKOS with freerepublic and see exactly who you are.
Don't like it? I'm sure you will respond like a freeper.
So you believe any post that gives you a way to mentally wiggle out of being wrong?
Your whole thought process is about protecting your ego.
She becomes un-electable.
The level of cognitive dissonance required to support her make 'her people' rocks in this regard. They will stick with her to the end, claiming she was railroaded.
No he's not. There are no Keynesian. Keynesians save money in good times. There are only 'print and spenders' with a cover story.
Four times. This must be a DNC talking point. Idiots likely don't remember the last time 'it's legal because of who I am' was asserted.
You don't understand the difference between GPL and BSD but felt the need to fart in the forum?
Exactly what I expect of you!
Three repetitions of 'Nixon's defense'...
There are now two nearly identical assertions of 'Nixon's defense' on this forum?
Does anybody get the DNC talking points email list that is willing to share?
When did this start getting pushed?
So now they are down to 'Nixon's defense'.
No, everything she does in not legal because of who she is.
Next defense. This is starting to get funny.
Hopefully the BSD licensed version continues to see development and the GPL version is ignored.
Why would they downgrade the license?
For computer people. Math problems start getting interesting when they are 'impossible to solve'.
We are not (all) mathematicians. Approximate solutions are useful. LP solvers are very useful applied math, even if I wouldn't want to write one myself.
Programming is a tool, so is math.
Your job doesn't require you to work on hard mathematical problems. It's not unusual. At least 50% of programmers basically do nothing more complicated than bean counting with databases.
But there are programmers that use floats everyday. Not having any advanced math will limit you.
Plugging and chugging formulas is not algebra.
They call it algebra in middle school to feed the little monsters egos. But it is not algebra.
Never argue with an education major. It's a waste of time, better off arguing with a rock.
The book is 'How to Lie with Statistics'.
It is a classic and should be read by everyone, even those who don't get math.
Linear algebra doesn't get really interesting until after DiffEq. You might be putting things in the wrong order if you want to 'grok' it.
It's like stats, you get a simplified version first, than later you get the attempt to 'grok' it version.
Nobody said you needed calc to take stats. You need calc to _understand_ stats.
How many people who only take pre-calc statistics even consider what distribution they are looking at before blindly applying formulas?
When all you have is a memorized formula, all distributions are normal.
Stats is 'memorize and regurgitate'/'plug and chug' before calculus. Fine as far as it goes, but often misapplied.
Of course for most people who are destined to never pass real calculus, all math is 'memorize and regurgitate'. It's why they do so poorly.
Sorry your carrier turned out to be pure bean counting. Better luck next resurrection.